Significance Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Research Articles

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

As a substantial waiting time is usually required for radical surgery, safe and effective preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is desired for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, the significance of NAC in advanced HNSCC is still unclear. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of NAC using the paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCE) regimen. We retrospectively evaluated the background characteristics, incidence of adverse events, overall response rate (ORR), pathological response, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in 26 patients. Patients receiving the PCE regimen were further divided into two groups based on the number of chemotherapy cycles (one cycle or more) and eligibility for cisplatin. Patients aged ≥ 75years and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60mL/min were classified as ineligible for cisplatin. The median age was 70 (27-81) years. The median eGFR at treatment initiation was 63.2 (41.1-89.7)mL/min. Fourteen (53.8%) patients were ineligible for cisplatin. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia was observed in 11 of 25 (42.3%) patients. No delay in or withdrawal from surgery was observed. The ORR was 65.4%. The 2-year RFS and OS were 61.5% and 76.7%, respectively. No significant differences in safety and efficacy between the number of chemotherapy cycles and cisplatin eligibility were observed. NAC using the PCE regimen for patients with locally advanced HNSCC, including cisplatin-ineligible patients, has acceptable toxicity and favorable efficacy.

Radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy revisited.

The therapeutic significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radiation therapy (RT) was negated during the early 1990s. Here, we compared post-NAC RT to surgery for chemo-sensitive cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This study included 79 consecutive patients with cervical SCC who were treated by NAC followed by surgery (n=49) or by definitive RT (n=30). We compared characteristics and survival outcomes between the surgery and RT groups by their responses to NAC. Of the 79 patients, 70 (89%) had stage II-IV disease and 41 (52%) had radiological pelvic lymph node enlargement. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of the entire cohort was 66.4% (median follow-up 54months). Fifty-five patients (70%) achieved sufficient (complete or partial) responses to NAC. Among patients with insufficient NAC responses, the 5-year DSS rate of the surgery group (55.6%) was significantly higher than the RT group (20.0%; P=0.044). However, among patients with sufficient responses to NAC, 5-year DSS rates did not significantly differ between the surgery and RT groups (82.3 vs 78.6%; P=0.79) even though the RT group had many more unfavorable prognostic factors and received fewer subsequent treatments than the surgery group. Post-NAC survival outcomes among patients with chemo-sensitive cervical SCC who then underwent RT were not inferior to those treated with surgery, and NAC did not detract from the efficacy of subsequent RT. Among selected patients who respond favorably to NAC, RT could be a less invasive substitute for surgery without compromising treatment outcomes.

Prognostic impact of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive surgery in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

The significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive surgery for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was investigated using surgical specimens. Surgery was performed in 58 patients, including 43 patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pathological response was classified as grades 0 (no effect), 1 (slight effect), 2 (moderate effect), and 3 (marked effect), and its correlation with prognosis was investigated. Grade 2 or 3 response was observed in 34.9% of cases that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control, and freedom from distant metastasis were significantly better in the effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (grades 2 and 3) than in the less effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (grades 0 and 1) and the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group combined. Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in sinonasal SCC was related to disease prognosis. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1305-E1311, 2016.

下咽頭扁平上皮癌に対するNeo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) の意義について

下咽頭扁平上皮癌に対するNeo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) の意義について

乳癌における術前化学療法の意義― 組織学的効果による予後予測 ―

乳癌における術前化学療法の意義― 組織学的効果による予後予測 ―