Sigma1 Subtypes Research Articles

Possible involvement of sigma‐1 receptors in the anti‐immobility action of bupropion, a dopamine reuptake inhibitor

Sigma receptors particularly, sigma-1 subtype is known to modulate the release of catecholamines in the brain and may participate in the mechanism of action of various antidepressants. The present study investigated the possible involvement of sigma receptors in modulating the anti-immobility-like effect of bupropion (a dopamine reuptake inhibitor) using the forced swim test (FST) in mice. Bupropion produced dose-dependent (10-40 mg/kg, i.p.) reduction in immobility period and the ED(50) value was found to be 18.5 (7.34-46.6) mg/kg, i.p. (+)-Pentazocine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.), a high-affinity sigma-1 receptor agonist, produced synergistic response when it was co-administered with a subeffective dose of bupropion (10 mg/kg, i.p.). On the contrary, pretreatment with progesterone (10 mg/kg, s.c.), a sigma-1 receptor antagonist neurosteroid, rimcazole (5 mg/kg, i.p.), another sigma-1 receptor antagonist, or BD 1047 (1 mg/kg, i.p.), a novel sigma-1 receptor antagonist, reversed the anti-immobility effects of bupropion (20 mg/kg, i.p.). The various modulators used in the study did not show any effect per se on locomotor activity except bupropion which at a higher dose (15-40 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly increased the locomotor activity. The results for the first time demonstrated the involvement of sigma-1 receptors in the anti-immobility effects of bupropion.

Involvement of sigma-1 receptor modulation in the antidepressant action of venlafaxine

Multiple lines of investigation have explored the role of sigma receptors in mental depression. Sigma receptors particularly, sigma-1 subtype is known to modulate the release of various catecholamines in the brain and may play, in some way, a role in the mechanism of action of various antidepressants. The present study investigated the possible involvement of sigma receptors in modulating the antidepressant-like effect of venlafaxine (dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) in the mouse forced swim test (FST). Immobility period in the forced swim test was registered for a total period of 6 min. Venlafaxine produced dose-dependent (4-16 mg/kg, i.p.) reduction in immobility period. Pretreatment of mice with (+)-pentazocine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.), a high-affinity sigma-1 receptor agonist, produced synergism with subeffective dose of venlafaxine (2 mg/kg, i.p.). On the contrary, pretreatment with progesterone (10 mg/kg, s.c.), a sigma-1 receptor antagonist neurosteroid, rimcazole (5 mg/kg, i.p.), another sigma-1 receptor antagonist, or BD 1047 (1 mg/kg, i.p.), a novel sigma-1 receptor antagonist, reversed the anti-immobility effects of venlafaxine (8 mg/kg i.p.). The various modulators used in the study did not produce any changes in locomotor activity per se except venlafaxine which at higher dose (16 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly increased the locomotor activity in mice. The results for the first time demonstrated that the anti-immobility effects of venlafaxine in the FST possibly involve an interaction with sigma-1 receptors.

The attenuation of learning impairments induced after exposure to CO or trimethyltin in mice by sigma (sigma) receptor ligands involves both sigma1 and sigma2 sites.

1. Sigma (sigma) receptor ligands were previously reported to alleviate learning and memory impairments on several pharmacological and pathological rodent models of amnesia. Such effect was demonstrated as involving the sigma1 subtype of sigma receptor. 2. In this study, we characterized the pharmacological effect mediated by sigma ligands on two lesional models of amnesia in mice: (1) the hypoxia-related learning and memory impairment model induced by repeated exposure to carbon monoxide (CO) gas; and (2) the intoxication with trimethyltin (1 mg kg(-1)). 3. The selective sigma1 ligand PRE-084 (1 mg kg(-1)) or the non-selective sigma1/sigma2 compounds DTG (0.1 mg kg(-1)), BD1008 (3 mg kg(-1)), and haloperidol (0.1 mg kg(-1)) reversed significantly the spontaneous alternation deficits observed 7 days after exposure to CO or 14 days after intoxication with trimethyltin. 4. The selective sigma1 receptor antagonist NE-100 (1 mg kg(-1)) was ineffective by itself, but blocked completely the PRE-084 effects, partially the DTG effects, and did not affect the effects induced by BD1008 or haloperidol. 5. A similar pharmacological profile was observed in the step-down type passive avoidance test performed 8 days after exposure to CO. 6. These results show that, in contrast to the previously reported amnesia models, the impairments induced after exposure to CO or intoxication with trimethyltin could be alleviated not only by sigma1 receptor agonists but also by sigma2 agonists. The particular pattern of neurodegeneration observed in these lesional models may explain these differences.

A new approach to the design of sigma-2-selective ligands: synthesis and evaluation of N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1- pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine-related polyamines at sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptor subtypes.

A series of polyamines based on the high affinity sigma receptor ligand N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (3) were developed and evaluated for their binding characteristics at sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptor subtypes. The data indicated that a considerable degree of structural variation is possible while still retaining nanomolar affinity at sigma receptors. As the structure of the polyamines was varied, their binding at sigma-1 and sigma-2 subtypes showed quite different and in some cases opposite trends, supporting the belief that these are pharmacologically distinct entities. Polyamines containing two nitrogen atoms showed optimal binding at both sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptor subtypes. Although additional nitrogen atoms resulted in decreased affinity at sigma-1 and sigma-2 subtypes, an increase in selectivity for sigma-2 subtypes was evident; the parent 3 showed greater selectivity for sigma-1 subtypes. Internitrogen spacings had a large effect on binding affinity and subtype selectivity. For example, the difference between N-[3-(1-pyrrolidinyl)propyl]-N'-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)-N,N'- dimethylethylenediamine (8) [K(i) = 29.9 nM at sigma-1 receptor and 18.3 nM at sigma-2 receptor] to N-[3-(1-pyrrolidinyl)propyl]-N'-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)- N,N'-dimethylethylenediamine (10) [K(i) = 1.49 nM at sigma-1 receptor and 12.1 nM at sigma-2 receptor] illustrates the importance of internitrogen spacing. Triamines 11 and 13 [Ki(sigma-2)/K(i)(sigma-1) = 0.19 and 0.10, respectively] containing the N-N-N-Ar spacings 3-3-2 and 4-4-2, proved to be the most sigma-2 subtype selective of the 15 polyamines examined in this study. The N-N-N spacings appear to be an important factor in their sigma-2 subtype selectivity. These compounds will serve as templates in the design of still further sigma-2 subtype selective ligands. The pyrrolidine ring (present in most of the polyamines tested in this series) proved to be an important recognition site for sigma receptor binding activity. Furthermore, alkyl substitution also appears to be important since the stripped down polyamines N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]ethylenediamine (15) and N1-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]diethylenetriamine (16) exhibited relatively low binding affinity.