AbstractThis paper provides insight into the provenance of the Late Miocene turbidite succession of the Tabernas Basin. Although this area has been extensively studied, only limited attention has been paid to sediment provenance. Through heavy mineral analysis, it has been possible to identify provenance‐related signatures from the adjacent Sierra de los Filabres and Sierra Alhamilla uplifts. Stable mineral ratio data confirm that the Sierra de los Filabres provided sediment with generally higher chloritoid:tourmaline and higher Type Bii garnet abundances than those derived from the Sierra Alhamilla. By comparison, modern sediments derived from the Sierra Alhamilla have garnet compositions with larger proportions of Types A and C, suggesting that the basinal sediments were not sourced from the incipient Sierra Alhamilla Uplift. Heavy mineral analysis confirms that the Sierra de los Filabres was the primary source for the Tabernas succession, with minor variations indicating that the erosive part of the system migrated across the uplift. Input was predominantly from the Nevado–Filábride Complex, with minor amounts from the small remnant of the Alpujarride Complex attached to the southern margin of the Sierra de los Filabres. Evidence strongly suggests a single sediment routing system but identifies some subtle provenance variations. In particular, there was a shift in detrital garnet composition between the Sartenella Formation and the Verdelecho Formation, Solitary Channel and El Gordo Megabed, which is attributed here to a shift in catchment within the Sierra de los Filabres. This shift appears to have occurred during the deposition of the Sartenella Formation, since the garnet compositions of the Verdelecho Formation and Solitary Channel are similar to each other and differ from the preceding part of the Sartenella Formation. The Solitary Channel displays marked heterogeneities in provenance character, manifested by changes in chloritoid abundance, consistent with previous studies that suggest the depositional architecture in the channel was influenced by high‐frequency changes in sediment flux and sea level.