Sialolithiasis Of Parotid Gland Research Articles

Combined sialendoscopic/mini-preauricular microscopic approach for large proximal parotid sialolithiasis

ObjectiveTo describe and evaluate a combined approach for sialendoscopic stone localization with microscopic mini-preauricular incision external stone extraction as a gland-sparing minimally invasive surgical management in cases of large proximal duct or intraparenchymal parotid gland sialolithiasis. MethodsA retrospective chart review of a single primary surgeon's patient series of 21 cases operated in a 5-year period in a tertiary care university and private practice hospitals. ResultsStudy included 16 males and five females, with age range 12–68 years (mean 40.9 ± 14.5). Nineteen out of the 21 patients had their stones completely removed (90.5%), with two not completing the procedure due to inability of intraoperative endoscopic stone visualization. In total 25 stones were extracted with six patients having two stones. Longest diameter of single (or first) stone was 5–16 mm (mean 9.1 ± 2.9) and second was 3–5 mm (mean, 3.9 ± 0.6). Endoscopic findings showed 14/25 stones in the proximal main parotid duct and 11/25 in one of its secondary parenchymal branches. Stents were used in 4/19 cases (21.1%). No major complications occurred. Minor complications included two postoperative conservatively managed seromas. All 19 cases had completely intact facial nerve function, good parotid salivary flow and acceptable esthetic result after median follow-up period of 26 months (range 6–62). ConclusionThe combined sialendoscopic/microscopic mini-preauricular approach is a highly effective and safe gland-preserving method for large proximal parotid sialolithiasis management with a main limitation being inability to visualize the stone endoscopically.

Success rate and complications of sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy in patients with parotid sialolithiasis: a systematic review.

To assess the success rate and complications of sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy for parotid sialolithiasis. A total of 228 articles were identified by the electronic database search regarding the topics sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy. Following independent then joint review of titles and abstracts, 109 articles were selected for the full review. Thirteen of these were chosen for data extraction from which 1285 patients with parotid salivary stones were identified. Extracted data included number of patients, age, gender, location, management, and outcomes. All articles combined, 1285 patients with parotid salivary stones were included with a successful treatment in 1139 patients. The success rated ranged from 71.4 to 100% with a mean of 88.7%. Both partial as complete success was achieved. Although minor complications were frequent, no major complications occurred. Sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy are best suited as first choice treatment-if conservative therapy failed-for the management of parotid gland sialolithiasis. It is a valuable and feasible treatment option with no major complications. Selection of cases will ensure the best prognosis. Although there is no indefinite stone size, the smaller the calculus, the greater the probability of a symptom-free patient.

Sialolithiasis of parotid gland with visible facial nerve twitchings – A rare case report with review of literature

Sialolithiasis of parotid gland with visible facial nerve twitchings – A rare case report with review of literature - IJMI- Print ISSN No: - 2581-382X Online ISSN No:- 2581-3838 Article DOI No:- 10.18231/j.ijmi.2019.025, IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging-IP Int J Maxillofac Imaging

The landmark for removal of sialoliths using sialendoscopy alone in parotid gland sialolithiasis

ObjectiveTo assess the general guidelines for removal of sialoliths in parotid gland sialolithiasis using sialendoscopy alone. MethodsWe analyzed 34 sialoliths treated using sialendoscopy in 26 patients with parotid gland sialolithiasis. We divided the Stensen’s duct and parotid gland into for parts using computed tomography findings: (A) front of the masseter, (B) anterior and lateral to the center (anterolateral) of the masseter, (C) posterior and lateral to the center (posterolateral) of the masseter, (D) behind of the masseter. The location and size of each sialolith was assessed. ResultsThe removal rates of sialoliths in the different locations by sialendoscopy alone were as follows: front of the masseter, 68.8%; anterolateral of the masseter, 60.0%; posterolateral of the masseter, 0%; and behind of the masseter, 33.3%. The removal rate using sialendoscopy alone was significantly higher in the sections anterior to the center of the masseter than in those posterior to the center of the masseter (66.7% [14/21] vs. 20.0% [2/10]; P=0.019). The size of the sialolith was not correlated to the removal rate by sialendoscopy alone. ConclusionSialoliths of the parotid gland located in positions anterior to the center of the masseter are significantly easier to remove by sialendoscopy alone. The center of the masseter is a general landmark for removal of sialoliths from the parotid gland using sialendoscopy alone. The size of the sialolith is not correlated with removal, except rare huge sialoliths.

Sialendoscopy-assisted transfacial removal of parotid sialoliths: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness and safety of the combined endoscopic-transfacial approach for parotid sialolith management. PubMed 1946-, Embase 1947-, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Review Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and FirstSearch Proceedings to March 2015. Published prospective or retrospective English-language studies with reported outcomes of more than one patient undergoing the combined endoscopic-transfacial procedure for parotid sialolithiasis were included. Two independent authors screened all eligible studies and reviewed and extracted data from relevant publications. Weighted pooled proportions for stone removal, symptom improvement, gland preservation, and complications were calculated. Ten studies, primarily retrospective single-institution studies, were included in the final analysis, with a total of 184 patients. Overall, the procedure was noted to be successful with low risk; the weighted pooled proportions were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.00) for stone removal, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99) for symptom improvement, 1 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00) for gland preservation, and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.15) for complications. Although our analysis is primarily based on retrospective data, the evidence shown here suggests that the combined endoscopic-transfacial technique is an effective treatment for parotid gland sialolithiasis not amenable to intraoral or purely endoscopic removal. This approach results in high rates of symptom improvement and gland preservation. The complication rates are low, further supporting the use of this technique. Laryngoscope, 127:2510-2516, 2017.

Endoscopic-assisted gland preserving therapy for the management of parotid gland sialolithiasis: Our preliminary experience

To analyze the efficacy and safety of sialendoscopy and a combined transoral or transcutaneous and sialendoscopic approach in the removal of parotid gland sialoliths. This retrospective study included 29 patients diagnosed with parotid gland sialolithiasis who required endoscopic-assisted gland preserving therapy. Ultrasonography and computed tomography were used to diagnose parotid sialolithiasis. The use of interventional sialendoscopy, sialendoscopic-transoral, or sialendoscopic-transcutaneous procedures was determined by the characteristics of the parotid gland stones. The stones were extracted by interventional sialendoscopy in nine patients. The transoral procedure was performed in 15 patients with large stones which were impacted in the ductal wall. The remaining five patients were managed through an external approach via a local incision under sialendoscopy. No postoperative complications occurred. The parotid glands were functioning normally after the procedures. The combined sialendoscopic-transoral and sialendoscopic-transcutaneous operation appears to be a good alternative for parotid gland sialolithiasis in the absence of lithotripsy devices. This type of therapy can, therefore, decrease the rate of parotidectomy.

Combined endoscopic–transcutaneous surgery in parotid gland sialolithiasis and other ductal diseases: reporting medium- to long-term objective and patients′ subjective outcomes

Objective was to assess the medium to long-term results and patients' perceive of success after combined sialoendoscopic and transcutaneous access in salivary gland diseases. A retrospective analysis was performed in a tertiary referral centre. A total of 19 patients have been treated with a combined sialoendoscopic and transcutaneous access. The main indication was sialolithiasis in 89.5 % of cases (n = 17), in 2 of these cases simultaneous complications were treated. Other indications included treatment-resistant stenosis and traumatic transection of the parotid duct. Intraductal stents were placed in 52.6 % of the cases. Patients were evaluated by clinical investigation, ultrasound examination and by a questionnaire to assess patients perceive of success. As a result the treatment was successful in 89.5 % of all cases, and in 94.1 % of the patients with sialolithiasis. Parotidectomy was required in two patients, as reconstruction of the ductal system was not possible intraoperatively (sialolithiasis, n = 1) or was unsuccessful (stenosis, n = 1). Prerequisites for successful treatment were the endoscopic access to the pathology, the possibility to reconstruct the duct and recovery of gland function postoperatively. A mean follow-up time for successfully treated patients was 40.67 months. All patients were satisfied with the results and reported a significant reduction in symptoms and improvement of their perceived quality of life (p = 0.001 each). As conclusion the combined access is a valuable alternative treatment in patients with sialolithiasis. Additional indications may include treatment-resistant stenosis and injuries to the parotid duct. However, the indication in stenosis needs to be carefully weighed up.

Lithotripsie extracorporelle (LEC) salivaire : étude rétrospective sur 1571 patients

The fragmentation of salivary stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been described since the 1990s. We wanted to assess its effectiveness through a retrospective study. We reviewed the files of 1571 patients (801 women and 770 men, from 6 to 85 years of age) treated by ESWL between 1995 and 2010 for 1031 submandibular (65.6%) and 540 parotid gland sialolithiasis (34.4%). The treatment consisted in one or several sessions of ESWL distributed over 3 to 24 months. Three thousand to 6000 shockwaves were delivered by session, if there was no hemostatic disorder or infection. Ultrasound control examinations were performed regularly and systematically. An average of six sessions was necessary. All the lithiases were fragmented, 1056 (67.2%) totally and 515 (32.8%) partially with residual fragments from 1 to 6mm in size. After treatment, 1446 patients (92%) were asymptomatic and 125 (8%) continued to present salivary symptoms, without residual fragments on ultrasound examination in 82% of the cases. The main adverse reaction was infection (628 patients, 40%) resolved thanks to antibiotic treatment or extraction of fragments under local anesthesia. Developed for 20 years, LEC is an excellent alternative to conventional surgery as long as indications are respected. It seems very effective, but its drawbacks are the length of management and the difficulty of ultrasound localization of calculi, which requires an experienced operator.

Combined endoscopic and transcutaneous approach for parotid gland sialolithiasis: Indications, technique, and results

Objective Despite all the advances of minimally invasive surgery, refractory stones remain in 10 to 20 percent of all cases of parotid gland sialolithiasis, and persistence of the symptoms makes removal of the gland inevitable. In some of these cases, however, it may be possible to conserve the gland using a combination of endoscopic and transcutaneous procedures. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Nine patients treated with a combined endoscopic transcutaneous operation were evaluated. During this procedure, the stone is removed through a skin incision under endoscopic guidance. Indications were sialolithiasis refractory to treatment (n = 5), sialolithiasis with complications (n = 2), contraindications to primary minimally invasive surgery (n = 1), and primary treatment (n = 1). In seven cases, the stones were extracted. Simultaneous resection of a sialocele was carried out in one case, and simultaneous resection of a saliva-cutaneous fistula was carried out in another. A stent was inserted in 66.7 percent of the cases. Results Treatment was successful in 88.9 percent of the patients. All of these patients were free of stones and symptoms, and glandular function was maintained both clinically and on ultrasound assessment. Complete parotidectomy had to be carried out in one case because it was not possible to reconstruct the duct system. Conclusion The combined operation offers a further option for gland-conserving treatment in cases with obstructive salivary gland disease, especially sialolithiasis. At present, it is indicated for cases that are resistant to treatment after sialendoscopy or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The gland resection rate can thus be further reduced.

P.241 Osteoblastoma of the mandibula: Report of a case

To assess the general guidelines for removal of sialoliths in parotid gland sialolithiasis using sialendoscopy alone.We analyzed 34 sialoliths treated using sialendoscopy in 26 patients with parotid gland sialolithiasis. We divided the Stensen’s duct and parotid gland into for parts using computed tomography findings: (A) front of the masseter, (B) anterior and lateral to the center (anterolateral) of the masseter, (C) posterior and lateral to the center (posterolateral) of the masseter, (D) behind of the masseter. The location and size of each sialolith was assessed.The removal rates of sialoliths in the different locations by sialendoscopy alone were as follows: front of the masseter, 68.8%; anterolateral of the masseter, 60.0%; posterolateral of the masseter, 0%; and behind of the masseter, 33.3%. The removal rate using sialendoscopy alone was significantly higher in the sections anterior to the center of the masseter than in those posterior to the center of the masseter (66.7% [14/21] vs. 20.0% [2/10]; P = 0.019). The size of the sialolith was not correlated to the removal rate by sialendoscopy alone.Sialoliths of the parotid gland located in positions anterior to the center of the masseter are significantly easier to remove by sialendoscopy alone. The center of the masseter is a general landmark for removal of sialoliths from the parotid gland using sialendoscopy alone. The size of the sialolith is not correlated with removal, except rare huge sialoliths.

Sialolithiasis: The radiolucent ones

Radiolucent calculi are discussed. Three cases are presented, with a sialographic interpretation of each. Recent studies show that radiolucent calculi in general and parotid gland sialolithiasis in particular occur more frequently than was previously believed.