Shoulder Activity Level Research Articles

Intraoperative changes to the components planned preoperatively do not affect short-term, postoperative clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThree-dimensional, computed tomography preoperative planning has been increasingly adopted among shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Prior studies have not examined outcomes in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in which the surgeon implanted prostheses that deviated from the preoperative plan compared to patients in which the surgeon followed the preoperative plan. The hypothesis of this study was that clinical outcomes would not be different between patients in which the surgeon utilized components that deviated from those predicted in the preoperative plan and patients in which the surgeon followed the preoperative plan. MethodsA retrospective review of patients that had preoperative planning for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from April 2017 through February 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: patients in which the surgeon utilized components that deviated from those anticipated by the preoperative plan (changed group), and patients in which the surgeon utilized all of the components anticipated by the preoperative plan (as planned group). Patient-reported outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and Shoulder Activity Level were recorded preoperatively, at one year, and at two years. Preoperative and one-year postoperative range of motion was recorded. ResultsOne hundred and eighty-nine patients were included in this study. One hundred forty-seven patients had intraoperative changes to their preoperative plan and 42 patients underwent reverse total arthroplasty without changes to their preoperative plan. There was no difference determined between any patient-reported outcome score at the one- and two-year postoperative time points between the as planned group and the changed group. No differences were found in range of motion between groups. Patients initially planned to undergo anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty that were intraoperatively converted to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had equivalent outcomes compared to those that had 1) other intraoperative deviations or 2) had no changes to their original preoperative plan. ConclusionPatients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty that had an intraoperative deviation to the components utilized in the preoperative plan had equivalent 1) patient-reported outcomes at one and two years after surgery and 2) range of motion one year after surgery compared to those that did not change from the preoperative plan. This study suggests it is safe to make intraoperative changes to the components utilized in the preoperative plan without concern for inferior postoperative outcomes when performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Athletic Ability in Shoulder Sports After Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Type 3 and 5 Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.

Promising short- and midterm outcomes have been seen after anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries. To evaluate long-term outcomes and shoulder-related athletic ability in patients after ACCR for chronic type 3 and 5 ACJ injuries. It was hypothesized that these patients would maintain significant functional improvement and sufficient shoulder-sport ability at a long-term follow-up. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Included were 19 patients (mean age, 45.9 ± 11.2 years) who underwent ACCR for type 3 or 5 ACJ injuries between January 2003 and August 2014. Functional outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Rowe, Constant-Murley, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores as well as the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, which were collected preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Postoperative shoulder-dependent athletic ability was assessed using the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS). Shoulder activity level was evaluated using the Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS), while the Subjective Patient Outcome for Return to Sports (SPORTS) score was collected to assess the patients' ability to return to their preinjury sporting activity. The mean follow-up time was 10.1 ± 3.8 years (range, 6.1-18.8 years). Patients achieved significant pre- to postoperative improvements on the ASES (from 54.2 ± 22.6 to 83.5 ± 23.1), Rowe (from 66.6 ± 18.1 to 85.3 ± 19), Constant-Murley (from 64.6 ± 20.9 to 80.2 ± 22.7), SST (from 7.2 ± 3.4 to 10.5 ± 2.7), SANE (from 30.1 ± 23.2 to 83.6 ± 26.3), and VAS pain scores (from 4.7 ± 2.7 to 1.8 ± 2.8) (P < .001 for all), with no significant differences between type 3 and 5 injuries. At the final follow-up, patients achieved an ASOSS of 80.6 ± 32, SAS level of 11.6 ± 5.1, and SPORTS score of 7.3 ± 4.1, with no significant differences between type 3 and 5 injuries. Four patients (21.1%) had postoperative complications. Patients undergoing ACCR using free tendon allografts for chronic type 3 and 5 ACJ injuries maintained significant improvements in functional outcomes at the long-term follow-up and achieved favorable postoperative shoulder-sport ability, activity, and return to preinjury sports participation.

Patients who have intraoperative deviations in their preoperative plan have inferior clinical and radiographic outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Three-dimensional, computed tomography, preoperative planning has become adopted among shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Prior studies have not examined outcomes in patients in which the surgeon implanted prostheses that deviated from the preoperative plan compared to patients in which the surgeon followed the preoperative plan. The hypothesis of this study was that clinical and radiographic outcomes would be equivalent between patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty that had a deviation in the components predicted in the preoperative plan compared to patients that did not have a change in the components predicted in the preoperative plan. A retrospective review of patients that had preoperative planning for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty from March 2017 thru October 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: patients in which the surgeon utilized components that deviated from those anticipated by the preoperative plan (changed group), and patients in which the surgeon utilized all of the components anticipated by the preoperative plan (planned group). Patient-determined outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOOS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Shoulder Activity Level (SAL) were recorded preoperatively, at one-year, and at two-years. Preoperative and one-year postoperative range-of-motion was recorded. Radiographic parameters to assess restoration of proximal humeral anatomy included humeral head height, humeral neck angle, humeral centering on the glenoid, and postoperative restoration of the anatomic center of rotation. One-hundred-and-fifty-nine patients had intraoperative changes to their preoperative plan and 136 patients underwent arthroplasty without changes to their preoperative plan. The planned group had higher scores compared to the group that had a deviation in the preoperative plan for every patient-determined outcome metric at every postoperative timepoint with statistically significant improvements found in the SST and SANE at one-year and SST and ASES at two-year follow-up. No differences were found in range of motion metrics between groups. Patients that did not have a deviation in their preoperative plan had more optimal restoration of their postoperative radiographic center of rotation compared to patients that did have a deviation in their preoperative plan. Patients that have intraoperative changes to their preoperative plan have 1) inferior postoperative patient determined outcome scores at one and two years after surgery and 2) a larger deviation in the postoperative radiographic restoration of the humeral center of rotation compared to patients that did not have intraoperative changes from the initial plan.

Is stemless total shoulder arthroplasty indicated in elderly patients?

Stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has represented the gold standard for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff for decades. To the author's knowledge, no study has specifically examined the outcomes of stemless, modular total shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients. The hypothesis of this study was that stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients (age ≥70 years) would have equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with a younger population (age <70 years). A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing primary, modular, stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis was retrospectively reviewed. Patient-determined outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOOS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and Shoulder Activity Level score were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 year and 2 years. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative range of motion was recorded. Postoperative radiographs were examined to assess for radiographic evidence of complications. Stemless arthroplasty was planned in 116 patients. Seven patients underwent conversion intraoperatively to a stemmed prosthesis. There was no difference between patients aged <70 yr and those aged ≥70 years who required intraoperative deviation from the preoperative plan to a stemmed prosthesis (5.8% vs 6.4%, P=.90). At the time of stemless arthroplasty, 64 patients were aged <70 yr and 44 patients were aged ≥70 years. Between the 2 groups, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences in WOOS, ASES, and SANE scores at baseline, 1-year follow-up, or 2-year follow-up. The changes in all scores from baseline to 2 years were similar between the group aged <70 yr and the group aged ≥70 years. There was no difference in the percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference or substantial clinical benefit in either group after shoulder arthroplasty at 2-year follow-up. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of final postoperative range of motion or change in range of motion for any metric examined. There was no evidence of radiographic complications in either group. Age ≥70 years does not appear to be a contraindication to stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Postoperative improvements in patient-determined outcome scores, the percentage of patients achieving clinically important outcomes for the ASES, SANE, and WOOS scores, and postoperative range of motion were similar between patients aged <70 yr and those aged ≥70 years. There was no difference between the groups regarding the patients who required intraoperative deviation from the preoperatively planned stemless prosthesis to a stemmed prosthesis. Neither age group demonstrated a radiographically apparent complication.

Stemless and stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes

BackgroundStemless total shoulder arthroplasty could provide benefits over stemmed arthroplasty which has represented the gold standard for decades. Proposed benefits of stemless arthroplasty include better reproduction of anatomy and reduction in stress shielding; however, this does not appear to be confirmed by any study. The hypothesis was there would be no clinical differences between the stemless and the short-stem prosthesis, but the stemless prosthesis would better reproduce coronal radiographic anatomy and have less radiographic evidence of stress shielding. Materials and MethodsA prospectively collected data of patients undergoing primary, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-determined outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and Shoulder Activity Level were recorded preoperatively, at 1 year, and at 2 years. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative range of motion was recorded. Radiographic parameters to assess restoration of proximal humeral anatomy included humeral head height, humeral neck angle, humeral centering on the glenoid, and postoperative restoration of the anatomic center of rotation. Final postoperative radiographs were assessed for evidence of stress shielding. ResultsForty-eight patients had a stemmed humeral prosthesis, and 109 patients had a stemless prosthesis. Patient-determined outcomes were available from 2 years postoperatively in 99.4%. Both groups had significant improvements in all patient-reported outcomes and range-of-motion metrics, but there were no differences between the stemless and stemmed groups in these outcomes. The prosthetic humeral head of the stemmed components was more likely to extend further superior to the humeral osseous margin than that of the stemless group (2.0 ± 2.4 vs. 0.8 ± 1.4 mm; P = .0004). The stemless group had a smaller postoperative deviation from the anatomic center of rotation than the stemmed group (2.5 ± 1.9 vs. 3.2 ± 2.1 mm; P = .04). The humeral neck angle was comparable between the stemmed group and the stemless group (133 ± 7° vs. 131 ± 8°; P = .06). There was similar mean deviation of humeral head centering on the glenoid prosthesis between the stemmed and stemless groups (1.9 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 1.7 mm; P = .20). There was evidence of stress shielding in 10 patients (21%) with a stemmed prosthesis and in no patients with a stemless prosthesis at 1-year follow-up (P < .0001). ConclusionsThere were no differences in patient-determined outcomes between the groups at 2-year follow-up. Restoration of proximal humeral anatomy was either better or equivalent with the stemless prosthesis compared to the stemmed one. Radiographic evidence of stress shielding was found in the stemmed prosthesis but not in the stemless prosthesis at 1-year follow-up.

The Shoulder Activity Level: an Italian Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation

The Shoulder Activity Level: an Italian Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation

Factors Associated With Shoulder Activity Level at Time of Surgery and at 2-Year Follow-up in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Stabilization Surgery

Background: Patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery have been shown to have elevated activity levels. Factors associated with shoulder activity in this patient population at baseline and after surgery are unknown. Hypothesis: Patient-specific variables are associated with shoulder activity level at baseline and at 2-year follow-up in a cohort of patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery were prospectively enrolled. As part of the data collection process, patients completed a previously validated Shoulder Activity Scale. A regression analysis was performed to assess the association of patient characteristics with baseline and 2-year follow-up shoulder activity levels. Results: A total of 764 (n = 612 men, n = 152 women) out of 957 patients (80%) undergoing shoulder stabilization surgery with a median age of 25 years had baseline and 2-year follow-up data and were included in the current analysis. The baseline shoulder activity level was associated with race ( P < .0001) and preoperative duration of instability (P < .0001). At 2 years, 52% of the cohort had returned to the same or higher activity level after surgery. Predictors of higher shoulder activity level at 2-year follow-up included higher baseline activity level (P < .0001), male sex (P < .0001), younger age (P = .004), higher body mass index (BMI) (P = .03), more dislocations (P = .03), nonsmokers (P = .04), and race (P = .04). Conclusion: A longer duration of preoperative symptoms was associated with a lower baseline activity in this cohort. High baseline preoperative shoulder activity, younger age, male sex, higher BMI, number of dislocations, and nonsmoking status predicted higher shoulder activity 2 years after shoulder stabilization surgery. Registration: NCT02075775 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Patient-specific risk profile associated with early-onset primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: is it really primary?

IntroductionAlthough age is considered to be the major risk factor of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GOA), younger population may suffer from degenerative changes of the shoulder joint without evidence of any leading cause. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk profile in young patients suffering from presumably primary GOA.MethodsA consecutive group of 47 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty for early-onset GOA below the age of 60 years at time of surgery was retrospectively identified and prospectively evaluated. Patients with identifiable cause for GOA (secondary GOA) were excluded. The resulting 32 patients (mean age 52 ± 7 years; 17 male, 15 female) with primary GOA were matched by age (± 3 years) and gender to 32 healthy controls (mean age 53 ± 7 years; 17 male, 15 female). Demographic data and patient-related risk factors were assessed and compared among both groups to identify extrinsic risk factors for primary GOA. Patients were further subdivided into a group with concentric GOA (group A) and a group with eccentric GOA (group B) to perform a subgroup analysis.ResultsPatients had a significantly higher BMI (p = 0.017), were more likely to be smokers (p < 0.001) and to have systematic diseases such as hypertension (p = 0.007) and polyarthritis (p < 0.001) and a higher Shoulder Activity Level (SAL) (p < 0.001) when compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, group B had a significantly higher SAL not only compared to healthy controls but also to group A, including activities such as combat sport (p = 0.048) and weightlifting (p = 0.01).ConclusionsSeveral patient-specific risk factors are associated with primary GOA in the young population, as well as highly shoulder demanding activities in the development of eccentric GOA. Consequently, a subset of young patients with eccentric primary GOA could in reality be secondary due to a muscular imbalance between internal and external rotators caused by improper weight training.Level of evidenceIII, Case–Control study

Does the Presence of Chondral Lesions Negatively Affect Patient-Determined Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

Background:There are limited data available to guide patients to their prognosis when glenohumeral chondral lesions are found during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Hypothesis:The primary hypothesis was that patients with glenohumeral chondral lesions will have inferior outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair compared with patients without chondral lesions. The secondary hypothesis was that patients with concomitant chondral lesions will have more severe preoperative symptoms compared with those without chondral lesions.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2008 and 2012. We examined the effects of chondral lesions on patient-determined outcomes, which included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Shoulder Activity Level (SAL). Shoulders without chondral lesions were compared with shoulders with chondral lesions to determine whether differences in severity of preoperative symptoms as well as postoperative improvements were statistically significant.Results:A total of 281 shoulders were included from 273 patients, with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. In total, 90 shoulders (32%) had concomitant chondral lesions in the glenohumeral joint. The presence and degree of chondral damage were not associated with the severity of preoperative symptoms or the amount of improvement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, as determined by patient outcome scores. Shoulders with bipolar chondral lesions had less postoperative improvement in their outcome scores compared with shoulders with unipolar lesions, with significant differences found in the SST (P = .0005), the SANE (P = .005), and the SAL (P = .04). Regardless of this, the majority of shoulders with bipolar chondral lesions (80%-92%) had postoperative improvements that superseded the minimal clinically important difference of the ASES, WORC, and SANE.Conclusion:At a mean 3.7-year follow-up, the presence of chondral damage did not appear to negatively affect the improvement in patient-determined outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, improvement in outcomes was negatively affected by the presence of bipolar chondral lesions.

Patient-Determined Outcomes After Arthroscopic Margin Convergence Rotator Cuff Repair

PurposeTo determine whether patients who require margin convergence would have equivalent postsurgical patient-determined scores compared with patients with standard rotator cuff repair. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether the short-term results found for patients with margin convergence repairs would be durable through medium-term follow-up.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed to examine the effects of marginal convergence on patient-determined outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Shoulder Activity Level). Patient-determined outcomes in patients who had margin convergence repairs were compared with patients who had standard rotator cuff repair. Prospective follow-up of patients that had margin convergence repairs was performed to determine whether patient-determined outcomes deteriorated over time.ResultsTwo-hundred-seventy-two patients had standard rotator cuff repairs and 9 patients had margin convergence rotator cuff repair (3.2%). All patients had significant improvements in their Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Patients requiring margin convergence rotator cuff repair had similar preoperative and postoperative scores compared with patients with a standard rotator cuff repair. At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, there was no change in outcome scores compared with the early follow-up time point (mean 3.3 years) for patients undergoing margin convergence.ConclusionsArthroscopic margin convergence repair techniques along with the treatment of concomitant pathologies result in similar patient-determined outcomes compared with standard rotator cuff repair techniques. These results appear to be durable and do not deteriorate from short-term to medium-term follow-up.Level of evidenceIII: Retrospective comparative study

Shoulder-Pacemaker Treatment Concept for Posterior Positional Functional Shoulder Instability: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Background: Pathological muscle activation patterns of the external rotators and periscapular muscles can result in posterior positional functional shoulder instability (PP-FSI). In several patients, physical therapy and surgical treatment are not successful. Purpose: The shoulder-pacemaker treatment concept was evaluated prospectively in patients with PP-FSI and previously failed conventional therapy attempt. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A negative selection of 24 consecutive cases of noncontrollable PP-FSI in 16 patients with previously failed conventional therapy were included in this prospective study. The shoulder-pacemaker treatment consisted of an electrical muscle stimulation–based therapy protocol with 9 to 18 one-hour treatment sessions. Two patients were excluded because of nonadherence to the training schedule, leaving a final study cohort of 21 cases in 14 patients. Follow-up included assessment of clinical function, impairment during daily activities and sports, satisfaction, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe score, and Subjective Shoulder Value at 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after intervention. Results: WOSI, Subjective Shoulder Value, and Rowe score showed a highly significant improvement at all time points of follow-up (P < .001). Young age (P = .005), low weight (P = .019), shoulder activity level (P = .003), unilateral affliction (P = .046), and higher baseline WOSI score (P = .04) were associated with a better treatment effect. Cases with increased glenoid retroversion, posterior scapulohumeral decentering, and dysplastic bony glenoid shape showed a trend toward shorter treatment effect duration. No complications during the intervention or follow-up period were observed. Conclusion: The shoulder-pacemaker therapy concept is an effective treatment with rapid improvement and sustained outcome over the course of 2 years in patients with noncontrollable PP-FSI with previously failed conventional treatment. Young and more athletic patients with lower weight and unilateral pathology respond best to the treatment.

Accelerometry evaluation of shoulder movement and its association with patient-reported and clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Accelerometers provide a new method to objectively measure recovery of movement and physical activity in patients following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and may overcome common limitations associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The aim of this study was to assess changes in upper limb movement using accelerometers following RTSAand investigate their association with other clinical outcome measures. Thirty-six patients who underwent RTSA wore accelerometers on both wrists and arms for 3 days at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. PROMs (Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, visual analog scale for pain, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, Shoulder Activity Level) and isometric shoulder strength were also assessed. Accelerometer outcomes were calculated to quantify counts of forearm and arm activityand the contribution of both arms to activity (limb symmetry and magnitude ratio). Changes and differences in all clinical measuresand objective movement measures were evaluated with within-subjects analysis of variance. Correlations between limb activity and other clinical measures were investigated using Spearman correlation coefficients. Objective movement of the operated arm increased from 3-6 months postsurgery (P = .004), but not from 6-12 months (P = .240). Limb asymmetries were observed at 3 and 6 monthsand improved by 12 months postsurgery. No associations were demonstrated between PROMs and objective upper limb movement at 12 months postsurgery. Despite early recovery of function and pain relief assessed by PROMs, objective movement using accelerometers showed delayed recovery of the operated arm postoperatively, before normalizing by 12 months postsurgery. Accelerometers provide a unique insight into functional recovery following RTSA.

The immediate and subsequent impact of a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in people aged 16-40: Results from a national cohort study.

Limited evidence exists which details changes in quality of life, shoulder activity level, kinesiophobia, shoulder pain and disability following a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (FTASD) in people treated non-operatively. This study had three objectives: (1) to examine quality of life, pain, disability and kinesiophobia after an FTASD within 12 weeks, (2) to examine whether these variables were different in people with and without recurrent shoulder instability and (3) to assess how these variables changed over 12 months. A prospective cohort study was undertaken in people with an FTASD aged between 16 and 40 years. Measures of quality of life, kinesiophobia, shoulder activity, shoulder pain and disability were recorded within 12 weeks of an FTASD and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. An FTASD negatively impacted quality of life, shoulder pain and function and these variables improved over time. People with recurrent shoulder instability had poorer quality of life 12 months after an FTASD. Across the entire cohort, kinesiophobia did not significantly change across time in people following an FTASD. Quality of life was significantly affected by an FTASD in people with recurrent shoulder instability. Across the entire cohort of people with an FTASD, kinesiophobia remained elevated in people following an FTASD. Level 1 prognostic study.

Effect of Balance Taping Using Kinesiology Tape and Cross Taping on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Case Report

Background and objectives: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common disorder among people with shoulder pain. The purpose of this case report was to investigate the effect of the combined application of balance taping using kinesiology tape and cross taping on a part-time worker with SIS. Case Report: Combined balance taping and cross taping was applied for 3 weeks (average, 16 hours per day) on a part-time worker with severe pain and a limited range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder who had visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores of 7 and 8 out of 10 for shoulder flexion and abduction, respectively, and pain and disability scores of the Shoulder Pain Disability Index (SPADI) of 37 out of 50 and 29 out of 80, respectively. After the combined application of balance taping and cross taping, the VAS pain scores for shoulder flexion and abduction decreased from 7 to 0 and from 8 to 0, respectively, and the ROM increased to a normal range. The SPADI pain score decreased from 37 to 2, and the disability score decreased from 29 to 1. Shoulder activity level also increased, and the patient was able to return to his part-time job. Conclusions: We suggest combined application of balance taping and cross taping as an effective treatment for part-time workers with SIS.

Patient-determined outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without biceps tenodesis utilizing the PITT technique

The percutaneous intra-articular transtendon technique (PITT) is a simple, rapid, and low-cost method of performing a biceps tenodesis. Few studies exist that examine the patient-determined outcomes of this technique in general or in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) with and without biceps tenodesis. We hypothesized that patients undergoing an isolated arthroscopic RCR would have equivalent outcomes to those undergoing RCRs with PITT biceps tenodesis. We compared preoperative, patient-determined outcomes scores on patients undergoing primary arthroscopic RCR with and without a PITT biceps tenodesis with postoperative scores at a minimum of 2 years. These scores included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Shoulder Activity Level (SAL). Indication for a concomitant biceps tenodesis was a partial long head biceps tendon tear or biceps instability/subluxation. A total of 153 patients underwent an isolated RCRand 131 patients underwent RCR with biceps tenodesis (RCRBT). Both groups had improvements in WORC, ASES, SANE, and SST (P < .0001) and deteriorations in the SAL (P ≤ .005). There was no difference in the change in outcome scores between the groups (RCRBT vs. RCR, respectively) for WORC (46 vs. 47; P = .85), ASES (46 vs. 47; P = .82), SANE (53 vs. 51; P = .35), SST (5.8 vs. 5.8; P = .93), and SAL (-0.9 vs. -1.4; P=.46). There was no difference between the groups in complications that required revision surgery (1.5% vs. 1.3%; P= .91). Arthroscopic PITT RCRBT is safe and effective with equivalent patient-determined outcomes compared with patients undergoing RCR without biceps tenodesis.

Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Shoulder and Proximal Biceps Disorders Are Associated With Patient Age, Race, Sex, and Activity Level.

Background:Patient preference information has become increasingly more important in clinical decision making.Purpose:To assess patient preferences when making treatment decisions in the shoulder to determine which features are more important according to patient age, race, activity level, and sex.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Study participants aged ≥18 years were surveyed as to their preferences regarding surgical treatment for shoulder and proximal biceps abnormalities. Survey features included time to return to unrestricted activities, time to return to work, size and appearance of scars, the potential for persistent pain in the upper arm or shoulder, fatigue in the biceps with repetitive lifting, potential for muscle cramping, and deformity in the proximal biceps. Participants also completed a validated shoulder activity scale, and demographic data regarding age, race, and sex were collected.Results:A total of 349 participants (166 female, 183 male) with a mean age of 45 years (range, 18-81 years) completed the survey. Overall, time to return to unrestricted activities and residual pain were considered very important to the majority of the respondents, while the size and appearance of surgical scars were of little importance. Prior shoulder pain (ρ = –0.17; P = .01) and prior shoulder surgery (ρ = –0.16; P = .03) correlated to concern about time to return to unrestricted activities. Younger age (ρ = –0.11; P = .04) and a higher level of education (ρ = 0.14; P = .03) correlated with greater concern for time to return to work. Women and African Americans were more concerned about the size and appearance of surgical scars (ρ = –0.28; P < .0001 and ρ = –0.20; P = .0002, respectively) and biceps deformity. Respondents with a higher activity level (ρ = 0.20; P = .0002) and men (ρ = 0.11; P = .04) were more concerned about fatigue.Conclusion:Concerns about residual pain, time to return to unrestricted activities, and time away from work are important to patients when considering the treatment for shoulder lesions. Patient preferences are associated with age, sex, race, and shoulder activity level. These features should be considered when discussing treatment options for shoulder and proximal biceps tendon disorders.

Does arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improve patients' activity levels?

Rotator cuff repair decreases pain, improves range of motion, and increases strength. Whether these improvements translate to an improvement in a patient's activity level postoperatively remains unknown. The Shoulder Activity Level is a valid and reliable outcomes survey that can be used to measure a patient's shoulder-specific activity level. Currently, there are no studies that examine the effect of rotator cuff repair on shoulder activity level. Preoperative patient-determined outcomes scores collected prospectively on patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were compared with postoperative scores at a minimum of 2 years. These scores included the Shoulder Activity Level, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and simple shoulder test. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Included were 281 shoulders from 273 patients with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. The postoperative median Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (42 vs. 94), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (41 vs. 95), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (30 vs. 95), and simple shoulder test (4 vs. 11) scores were statistically significantly improved compared with preoperative scores (P < .0001). The postoperative median Shoulder Activity Level score decreased compared with the preoperative score (12 vs. 11; P < .0001). Patients reported a statistically significant deterioration of their Shoulder Activity Level score after rotator cuff repair compared with their preoperative scores, although disease-specific and joint-specific quality of life scores all had statistically significantly improvement. This study suggests that patients generally have (1) significant improvements in their quality of life and (2) small deteriorations in activity level after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Does total shoulder arthroplasty improve patients' activity levels?

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) decreases pain, improves range of motion, and increases strength. Whether these improvements translate to improvements in activity levels postoperatively remains unknown. The Shoulder Activity Level (SAL) is a valid and reliable outcomes survey that measures the patient's activity level. Currently, no studies have specifically examined the effect of TSA on SAL. A prospective collection of preoperative, patient-determined outcomes on patients undergoing TSA was compared with postoperative scores at a minimum of 2 years. These scores included the SAL, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing primary anatomic TSA or reverse TSA. A mean follow-up of 3.7 years was available for 80 anatomic and 42 reverse TSAs. Anatomic TSAs had improvements from median preoperative scores to median postoperative scores for WOOS (34 to 89; P < .0001), ASES (30 to 87; P < .0001), SST (2 to 9; P < .0001), and SANE scores (23 to 90; P < .0001). The SAL improved from 7 to 8 but did not quite reach statistical significance (P = .07). Reverse TSAs had improvements from median preoperative scores to median postoperative scores for WOOS (31 to 83; P < .0001), ASES (29 to 82; P < .0001), SST (2 to 7; P < .0001), and SANE scores (20 to 85; P < .0001). The SAL improved from 4.5 to 6, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .38). However, when anatomic and reverse TSAs were analyzed together, a statistically significant improvement was found postoperatively in the SAL (from 6 to 8; P = .006). Anatomic TSA and reverse TSA improved activity levels. In addition, disease-specific and joint-specific quality of life scores all had statistically significant improvements. This study suggests that after shoulder arthroplasty patients in general have (1) significant improvements in their quality of life and (2) have small improvements in activity level. This study shows that most patients do not have to decrease their activity levels to diminish symptoms to an acceptable range.

The influence of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a subscapularis tenotomy on shoulder strength

There is limited evidence describing the influence of total shoulder arthroplasty on strength. The hypothesis was that after total shoulder arthroplasty, strength would improve compared with the preoperative state but remain inferior to that of the nonoperative shoulder. An additional aim was to determine whether strength improvement was associated with improvements in outcome scores and motion. Thirty-six patients underwent total shoulder arthroplasty, with 31 patients (86%) having 1 year of follow-up for all outcomes. Patient-determined outcomes (Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation rating; and shoulder activity level), range of motion, and strength were assessed. Isometric strength was determined for scaption and external rotation, as well as the liftoff test, belly-press test, and bear-hug test. All strength measures improved, with significant increases in external rotation, the liftoff test, and the bear-hug test, but remained inferior to the nonoperative-side strength. Improved strength in the belly-press test was associated with greater improvement in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. Improvements in scaption and belly-press testing were associated with improvements in active flexion. Strength improvements in the liftoff test were associated with improved internal rotation in 90° of abduction. Patients with improvements in strength had improvements in their shoulder activity level from baseline to final follow-up, whereas patients without improved strength test findings did not have improved shoulder activity levels. Total shoulder arthroplasty improved external rotation, liftoff, and bear-hug strength testing. Operative shoulder strength remained inferior to strength of the nonoperative shoulder. Patients with improvements in strength were more likely to have greater improvements in outcome scores and range of motion. Improvements in the shoulder activity level after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty may be dependent on improvements in strength.

Shoulder activity level and progression of degenerative cuff disease

This study prospectively examined the relationship of direct and indirect measures of shoulder activity with the risks of tear progression and pain development in subjects with an asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tear. A cohort of asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears was prospectively monitored annually, documenting tear size progression with ultrasound imaging and potential shoulder pain development. Shoulder activity level, self-reported occupational and physical demand level, and hand dominance were compared with risks of tear enlargement and future pain development. The study monitored 346 individuals with a mean age of 62.1 years for a median duration of 4.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2.4-7.9 years). Tear enlargement was seen in 177 shoulders (51.2%), and pain developed in 161 shoulders (46.5%) over time. Tear presence in the dominant shoulder was associated with a greater risk of tear enlargement (hazard ratio, 1.40; P = .03) and pain development (hazard ratio, 1.63; P = .002). Shoulder activity level (P = .37) and occupational demand level (P = .62) were not predictive of tear enlargement. Occupational demand categories of manual labor (P = .047) and "in between" (P = .045) had greater risks of pain development than sedentary demands. The median shoulder activity score for shoulders that became painful was lower than for shoulders that remained asymptomatic (10.0 [IQR, 7.0-13.0] vs. 11.0 [IQR, 8.0-14.0], P = .02). Tear enlargement and pain development in asymptomatic tears are more common with involvement of the dominant shoulder. Shoulder activity level is not related to tear progression risks. Pain development is associated with a lower shoulder activity level even though patients with higher occupational demands are more likely to develop pain.