Shorter Mean Operative Time Research Articles

Comparison of supine and prone mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients: a retrospective study.

To compare the safety and effectiveness of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (m-PNL) operations performed in the supine and prone positions in obese patients. We retrospectively analysed data from obese patients (BMI ≥ 30) who underwent prone or supine mPCNL between January 2014 and June 2021 in our clinic. Kidney anomalies, coagulopathy, solitary kidney, skeletal deformity, and patients under 18 were excluded. Outcomes measures included operation time, fluoroscopy time, duration of hospitalisation, stone-free rate, and complications classified by Clavien-Dindo. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. The study included 338 patients (100 supine, 238 prone). Supine mPCNL had a shorter mean operation time (89.6 vs. 100.3 minutes, p=0.001), fluoroscopy time, and duration of hospitalisation (60.7 vs. 112.0 hours, p=0.001). Overall complication rates were comparable, but major complications were higher in the prone group (p=0.041). Logistic regression identified stone size >25 mm and prone position as significant risk factors for major complications. Supine and prone mPCNL are both effective for treating kidney stones in obese patients. Supine mPCNL offers benefits, such as shorter operation time, reduced radiation exposure, and fewer major complications. Careful monitoring is recommended for patients with high CCI scores or larger stones due to increased complication risks.

Comparative evaluation of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) as the treatment of stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (AO type 31-A1). The comparison was focused on perioperative outcomes, Harris hip scores (HHSs), and major orthopedic complications. PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect were searched for studies comparing PFNA and DHS for stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. The authors conducted separate screenings to determine eligible studies for this meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials 2 and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies–of Interventions-I. All outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager software version 5.4 and presented as forest plots. Ten studies were included in this analysis (three randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies) with 1149 patients. For the intraoperative parameters, PFNA had shorter mean operative time (mean difference [MD] −18.63, 95% interval [CI] [−27.92–−9.34], P < 0.0001) and led to less intraoperative blood loss (MD −88.84, 95% CI [−158.03–−19.65], P = 0.01). No significant differences in HHSs and complications were found between PFNA and DHS, and leg length discrepancy (risk ratio 0.40, 95% CI [0.17–0.92], P < 0.03) favoring PFNA. Overall, these two surgical methods have no meaningful differences in long-term functional outcomes and complications. The PFNA may be more beneficial in the perioperative aspect, including shorter surgical duration and lesser blood loss due to its minimally invasive nature.

The contribution of E3D imaging integrated with robotic navigation: analysis of the first 80 consecutive posterior spinal fusion cases

Eighty consecutive complex spinal robotic cases utilizing intraoperative 3D CT imaging (E3D, Group 2) were compared to 80 age-matched controls using the Excelsius robot alone with C-arm Fluoroscopic registration (Robot Only, Group 1). The demographics between the two groups were similar—severity of deformity, ASA Score for general anesthesia, patient age, gender, number of spinal levels instrumented, number of patients with prior spinal surgery, and amount of neurologic compression. The intraoperative CT scanning added several objective factors improving patient safety. There were significantly fewer complications in the E3D group with only 3 of 80 (4%) patients requiring a return to the operating room compared to 11 of 80 (14%) patients in the Robot Only Group requiring repeat surgery for implant related problems (Chi squared analysis = 5.00, p = 0.025). There was a significant reduction the amount of fluoroscopy time in the E3D Group (36 s, range 4–102 s) compared to Robot only group (51 s, range 15–160 s) (p = 0.0001). There was also shorter mean operative time in the E3D group (257 ± 59.5 min) compared to the robot only group (306 ± 73.8 min) due to much faster registration time (45 s). A longer registration time was required in the Robot only group to register each vertebral level with AP and Lateral fluoroscopy shots. The estimated blood loss was also significantly lower in Group 2 (mean 345 ± 225 ml) vs Group 1 (474 ± 397 ml) (p = 0.012). The mean hospital length of stay was also significantly shorter for Group 2 (3.77 ± 1.86 days) compared to Group 1 (5.16 ± 3.40) (p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the number of interbody implants nor corrective osteotomies in both groups—Robot only 52 cases vs. 42 cases in E3D group.Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective review.

Exploring the Benefits of a Reduced-Port Approach in Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Comparative Study of the Two-Port and Three-Port Techniques.

Background: Robotic adrenalectomy has become a surgical treatment option for benign and selected malignant adrenal diseases. We aimed to evaluate the eligibility of two-port robotic posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) as an alternative to the conventional three-port technique by comparing their surgical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared the clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes among 197 patients who underwent two-port or three-port robotic adrenalectomy between 2016 and 2020 in a single tertiary center. For further evaluation, propensity score matching was performed to reduce the selection bias in population characteristics. Results: Patients were categorized by the number of ports (two-port group, 87; and three-port group, 110). The two-port group compared with the three-port group was significantly older (P = .006) and had a smaller mean tumor size (P = .003) and shorter mean operation time (P = .001). Upon comparing clinicopathologic characteristics according to adrenal disorders, for pheochromocytoma, the three-port group had a larger tumor size and a longer operation time. For Cushing's syndrome, the operation time was short and numeric rating scale pain score was significantly low in the two-port group. After propensity score matching, the two-port group had a short operation time and a significantly low postoperative pain score (P < .05). Predictive factors associated with prolonged operation time included male gender, an increased number of ports, and large tumor size. Conclusions: The two-port technique resulted in a shorter operation time and lower pain score compared with the three-port technique. The two-port technique may be a safe alternative to the conventional three-port technique for robotic PRA.

Mean Operative Time And Stay In Hospital Between Transurethral Removal Using Nephroscope And Percutaneous Cyst-lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Large Bladder Calculi

Background: urinary bladder stones comprise 5% of cases of urolithiasis1, with single calculi being identified in most instances but numerous calculi in 25% of cases2. With the development of endourological fiberoptic equipment and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (swl), there have been notable modifications to managing and treating vescicolithiasis3. Thanks to this Study, we shall know the local amount of hospital stay and operating time between the two operations. We will suggest the method that results in a shorter surgical time and a shorter hospital stay since both have been successfully documented in the literature. Objective: to compare the length of hospital stay and average operating time for transurethral removal of big bladder calculi using a nephroscope with percutaneous cystolithotripsy. Study design : A randomized controlled trial Duration and place of study: from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, at the Department of Urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Transplant, Peshawar Methodology: The Study used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) strategy, examining 60 individuals (30 in each group). The study covered all patients aged 20 to 65 years, female or male, presenting with bladder stones larger than 3 cm and with any number of rocks. All of the individuals who presented with renal insufficiency (defined as creatinine more than 3 mg/dl), active renal tract infection (defined as a fever greater than 38.5°c and positive urine culture), and obesity (defined as BMI greater than 30) were not included in the Study. The included patients were split into two groups using permitted blocks and blocked randomization. Patients in group b had percutaneous cystolithotripsy, whereas patients in group A underwent transurethral removal using a nephroscope. Following the operation, the length of hospital stay was calculated by tracking each patient until they decided to be discharged. After entering all of the data on the proforma into the statistical program SPSS version 23.0, a comparison analysis was carried out. Results: according to our analysis, nine patients (30%) in group A were between the ages of 20 and 40, and 21 patients (70%) were between the ages of 41 and 65. In contrast, 15 (50%) patients in group b were between 20 and 40, and 15 (50%) were between 41 and 65. Seven patients (23%) and 23 patients (77%) in Group A were female, and in contrast, six patients (20%) and 24 patients (80%) in Group B were female. Group A had an average surgical duration of 35.06 minutes (sd ± 5) and an average hospital stay of 2.6 days (sd ± 0.9). In contrast, group b saw an average surgical duration of 44.06 minutes (sd ± 7) and an average hospital stay of 3.4 days (sd ± 1.02). Conclusion: The Results Of Our Study Indicate That, When Treating Big Bladder Calculi, Transurethral Removal With A Nephroscope Had A Shorter Mean Operation Time And Hospital Stay Than Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy. Keywords: Mean Operative Time, Hospital Stay, Nephroscope, Percutaneous Cystolithotripsy, Bladder

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases.

Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). The LDP group also had a higher rate of postoperative complications (43.5% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major complication or pancreatic fistular after operations (p = 0.20 and p = 0.71, respectively). For planned spleen-preserving operations, the RDP group had a shorter mean operative time (147 min vs. 194 min, p = 0.015) and a reduced total length of hospital stay compared with the LDP group (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0002). The failure rate for spleen preservation was 0% in RDP and 20% (n = 5/25) in the LDP group (p = 0.009). RDP offered a better method for splenic preservation with Kimura's technique compared with LDP to avoid the risk of splenic infarction and gastric varices related to ligation and division of splenic pedicles. RDP should be the standard operation for the resection of pancreatic tumours at the body and tail of the pancreas without involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery.

Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study.

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem. By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened. A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months. This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 ± 9.02 vs. 34.47 ± 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 ± 5.30 vs. 34.68 ± 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 ± 20.41 vs. 143.50 ± 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 ± 12.35 vs. 32.43 ± 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 ± 0.43 vs. 1.87 ± 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 ± 3.12 vs. 28.14 ± 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups. SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.

Treatment of proximal humeral fractures accompanied by medial calcar fractures using fibular autografts: A retrospective, comparative cohort study.

Severe proximal humerus comminuted fractures are often accompanied by medial calcar comminuted fractures and loss of medial support, which are important factors that lead to internal fixation failure. The appropriate treatment for proximal humerus comminuted fractures has not been established. Therefore, this study assessed the outcomes of using a fibular autograft with locking plates to treat severe proximal humerus comminuted fractures. To investigate the outcomes of using a fibular autograft with locking plates to treat severe proximal humerus comminuted fractures. This retrospective, comparative cohort study included two groups of patients. Group 1 comprised 22 patients and group 2 comprised 25 patients with complete follow-up data. Group 1 was treated with a fibular autograft with open reduction and locking plates to enable internal fixation. Group 2 was treated with open reduction and locking plates to enable internal fixation. The intraoperative blood loss volume from the shoulder wound, operative time, shoulder wound pain, bone fracture healing time, Constant-Murley score of the shoulder joint, preoperative Holden walking function score, Mallet score of the shoulder joint, and humeral neck-shaft angle during surgery of the two groups were compared, and the differences were analysed using an independent sample t-test. Group 1 had a shorter mean operative time than group 2 (2.25 ± 0.30 h vs 2.76 ± 0.44 h; P = 0.000). Group 1 had a lower shoulder wound pain score on the first day after surgery than group 2 (7.91 ± 1.15 points vs 8.56 ± 1.00 points; P = 0.044). Group 1 had a shorter fracture healing time than group 2 (2.68 ± 0.48 mo vs 3.64 ± 0.64 mo; P = 0.000). Group 1 had higher Constant-Murley scores of the shoulder joint at 3, 6, and 12 mo after surgery than group 2 (76.64 ± 4.02 points vs 72.72 ± 3.02 points, 86.36 ± 3.53 points vs 82.96 ± 3.40 points, and 87.95 ± 2.77 points vs 84.68 ± 2.63 points, respectively; P = 0.000, 0.002, and 0.000, respectively). Group 1 had higher Mallet scores of the shoulder joint at 3, 6, and 12 mo after surgery than group 2 (10.32 ± 0.57 points vs 9.96 ± 0.54 points, 13.36 ± 1.00 points vs 12.60 ± 0.87 points, and 13.91 ± 0.75 points vs 13.36 ± 0.70 points, respectively; P = 0.032, 0.007, and 0.013, respectively). Using locking plates with a fibular autograft can recreate medial support, facilitate fracture healing, and improve shoulder function; therefore, this may be an effective treatment option for severe proximal humerus comminuted fractures.

Mesh Fixation Versus Nonfixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

It remains controversial whether mesh should be fixed during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair. A registration was listed with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration no. CRD42022350469). Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify RCTs comparing fixation with nonfixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain at 24hours and recurrence. Secondary outcomes were mean operative time, urinary retention, and postoperative pain at 6months. A total of 18 trials, including 2617 patients with 2878 hernias, were included in this meta-analysis. In contrast to the fixation group, the nonfixation group was associated with lower postoperative pain scores at 24hours and 6months, a shorter mean operative time, and a lower incidence of urinary retention. There were no significant differences between the 2 types of procedures in terms of the rate of recurrence for patients with an inguinal hernia orifice smaller than 4cm in size. The nonfixation technique is an effective method to reduce urinary retention, mean operative time, and postoperative pain at 24hours and at 6months; however, the rate of recurrence was comparable to that of the fixation method.

Comparative study on the clinical outcomes and prognosis of endovascular embolization and craniotomy clipping for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

To investigate the safety and outcomes of endovascular embolization and craniotomy clipping in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. We collected the clinical data of 106 patients with cerebral aneurysm who underwent surgical treatment (endovascular embolization, Group-A, n=55; craniotomy clipping, Group-B, n=51) in the First People's Hospital of Yichang from January 2020 to May 2021. We compared surgical treatment indexes, treatment costs, neurological function before and after the treatment, incidence of postoperative complications and the prognosis after one-year follow-up between the two groups. Endovascular embolization (Group-A) was associated with a shorter mean operation time and hospital stay, a lower mean intraoperative bleeding amount, and a higher mean treatment cost than craniotomy clipping (Group-B) (P<0.05). Compared with the pre-operative neurological function scores, the scores of both groups decreased after the surgery, and the mean post-operative score of Group-A was significantly lower than that of Group-B (P<0.05). Compared with Group-B , patients in Group-A had a lower overall complication rate (P < 0.05. Higher proportion of patients in Group-A had a good prognosis (P < 0.05). Endovascular embolization for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms is safe as it can shorten the operation time and hospital stay, reduce the incidence of neurological injury and complications, and have a favorable prognosis. However, the treatment is more expensive. Endovascular embolization can be selected for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms when economic conditions allow it.

Does Surgical Approach Influence Complication Rate of Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Femoral neck fractures are an epidemiologically significant issue with major effects on patients and health care systems, as they account for a large percentage of bone injuries in the elderly. Hip hemiarthroplasty is a common surgical procedure in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Several surgical approaches may be used to access the hip joint in case of femoral neck fractures, each with its own benefits and potential drawbacks, but none of them has consistently been found to be superior to the others. This article aims to systematically review and compare the different approaches in terms of the complication rate at the last follow-up. Methods: an in-depth search on PubMed/Scopus/Web of Science databases and a cross-referencing search was carried out concerning the articles comparing different approaches in hemiarthroplasty and reporting detailed data. Results: A total of 97,576 hips were included: 1030 treated with a direct anterior approach, 4131 with an anterolateral approach, 59,110 with a direct lateral approach, and 33,007 with a posterolateral approach. Comparing the different approaches, significant differences were found in both the overall complication rate and the rate of revision surgery performed (p < 0.05). In particular, the posterolateral approach showed a significantly higher complication rate than the lateral approach (8.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the dislocation rate in the posterolateral group was significantly higher than in the other three groups considered (p < 0.026). However, the posterolateral group showed less blood loss than the anterolateral group (p < 0.001), a lower intraoperative fractures rate than the direct anterior group (p < 0.035), and shorter mean operative time than the direct lateral group (p < 0.018). Conclusions: The posterolateral approach showed a higher complication rate than direct lateral approach and a higher prosthetic dislocation rate than the other three types of surgical approaches. On the other hand, patients treated with posterolateral approach showed better outcomes in other parameters considered, such as mean operative time, mean blood loss and intraoperative fractures rate. The knowledge of the limitations of each approach and the most common associated complications can lead to choosing a surgical technique based on the patient's individual risk.

Comparative study between anterior and posterior approach in emergent femoral hernia

Objectives/aims Emergency surgery is necessary for incarcerated and/or strangulated femoral hernias. With regard to emergency femoral hernia repair, this study attempted to compare between open anterior and open posterior (preperitoneal) techniques. Methods Patients who underwent emergency femoral hernia repair between October 2020 and October 2022 were included in this single centre retrospective cohort research. They were divided into two groups based on the surgical incisions: the anterior approach group (19 cases) and the posterior approach group (14 cases). Open anterior and posterior methods were compared using patient demographic information, intraoperative findings, operating time, and postoperative outcomes. Results 33 patients in total were included in the current study. 19 patients (57.6%) underwent open anterior approach, whereas 14 patients (42.4%) underwent open preperitoneal approach. Patient features indicated a similarity between the two groups. The posterior approach group experienced considerably shorter mean operative time (53.624 7 min vs 77.936 5 min, P = 0.039) and recovery time (9.24 1days vs 13.36 6days, P = 0.049) before returning to full activity. The posterior approach group had a decreased (7.14%) rate of postoperative complications, such as wound infection, seroma/hematomas, persistent discomfort, and hernia recurrence. Conclusion While it can increase the rate of first-stage tension-free repair of incarcerated femoral hernia and with a lower risk of postoperative complications, the open preperitoneal approach for emergency femoral hernia may be preferable to other procedures.

Hemorrhagic Retinal Detachment Treated by Drainage Sclerotomy Combined with Subretinal and Submacular Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of a new drainage procedure for treating subretinal hemorrhage (SRH) in hemorrhagic retinal detachment (RD) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: Forty-three eyes with hemorrhagic RD attributable to PCV underwent vitrectomy. External drainage via sclerotomy was performed in 25 eyes and internal drainage via retinotomy was performed in 18 eyes, respectively. Based on different surgical techniques, the external drainage group was divided into simple external drainage subgroup (10 eyes), external drainage combined with intravitreal injections of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) subgroup (7 eyes), and external drainage combined with subretinal and/or submacular injections of tPA subgroup (8 eyes). The internal drainage group was divided into small retinotomy subgroup (7 eyes) and large retinotomy subgroup (11 eyes). The anatomic reattachment of the retina and postoperative complications were compared between different groups and subgroups. Results: The external drainage technique had shorter mean operation time, higher retinal reattachment rate, and fewer postoperative complications rate compared to the internal drainage procedure. The subfoveal hemorrhage subsided significantly sooner in the large retinotomy subgroup and external drainage combined with subretinal and/or submacular injections of tPA subgroup compared to the small retinotomy subgroup and the external drainage without tPA group (p < 0.05). The small retinotomy subgroup had higher rates of hemorrhage and elevated IOP compared to other subgroups during the first week of the postoperative period (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that external drainage of SRH combined with subretinal and/or submacular injections of tPA can make the operation simpler, shorten the operation time, reduce the postoperative complications with rapid regression of subfoveal hemorrhage, resulting in an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for treating hemorrhagic RD.

Accelerated discharge after aseptic revision knee arthroplasty is not associated with early readmission and reoperation.

In the last decade, perioperative advancements have expanded the use of outpatient primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite this, there remains limited data on expedited discharge after revision TKA. This study compared 30-day readmissions and reoperations in patients undergoing revision TKA with a hospital stay greater or less than 24 hours. The authors hypothesized that expedited discharge in select patients would not be associated with increased 30-day readmissions and reoperations. Aseptic revision TKAs in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were reviewed from 2013 to 2020. TKAs were stratified by length of hospital stay (greater or less than 24 hours). Patient demographic details, medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, operating time, components revised, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations were compared. Multivariate analysis evaluated predictors of discharge prior to 24 hours, 30-day readmission, and reoperation. Of 21,610 aseptic revision TKAs evaluated, 530 were discharged within 24 hours. Short-stay patients were younger (63.1 years (49 to 78) vs 65.1 years (18 to 94)), with lower BMI (32.3 kg/m2 (17 to 47) vs 33.6 kg/m2 (19 to 54) and lower ASA grades. Diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and cancer were all associated with a hospital stay over 24 hours. Single component revisions (56.8% (n = 301) vs 32.4% (n = 6,823)), and shorter mean operating time (89.7 minutes (25 to 275) vs 130.2 minutes (30 to 517)) were associated with accelerated discharge. Accelerated discharge was not associated with 30-day readmission and reoperation. Accelerated discharge after revision TKA did not increase short-term complications, readmissions, or reoperations. Further efforts to decrease hospital stays in this setting should be evaluated.Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(12):1323-1328.

Venographic classification and long-term surgical treatment outcomes for axillary-subclavian vein thrombosis due to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (Paget-Schroetter syndrome)

ObjectiveWe assessed the clinical presentation, operative findings, and surgical treatment outcomes for axillary-subclavian vein (AxSCV) thrombosis due to venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS). MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-center review of 266 patients who had undergone primary surgical treatment of VTOS between 2016 and 2022. The clinical outcomes were compared between the patients in four treatment groups determined by intraoperative venography. ResultsOf the 266 patients, 132 were male and 134 were female. All patients had a history of spontaneous arm swelling and idiopathic AxSCV thrombosis, including 25 (9%) with proven pulmonary embolism, at a mean age of 32.1 ± 0.8 years (range, 12-66 years). The timing of clinical presentation was acute (<15 days) for 132 patients (50%), subacute (15-90 days) for 71 (27%), and chronic (>90 days) for 63 patients (24%). Venography with catheter-directed thrombolysis or thrombectomy (CDT) and/or balloon angioplasty had been performed in 188 patients (71%). The median interval between symptom onset and surgery was 78 days. After paraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression and external venolysis, intraoperative venography showed a widely patent AxSCV in 150 patients (56%). However, 26 (10%) had a long chronic AxSCV occlusion with axillary vein inflow insufficient for bypass reconstruction. Patch angioplasty was performed for focal AxSCV stenosis in 55 patients (21%) and bypass graft reconstruction for segmental AxSCV occlusion in 35 (13%). The patients who underwent external venolysis alone (patent or occluded AxSCV; n = 176) had a shorter mean operative time, shorter postoperative length of stay and fewer reoperations and late reinterventions compared with those who underwent AxSCV reconstruction (patch or bypass; n = 90), with no differences in the incidence of overall complications or 30-day readmissions. At a median clinical follow-up of 38.7 months, 246 patients (93%) had no arm swelling, and only 17 (6%) were receiving anticoagulation treatment; 95% of those with a patent AxSCV at the end of surgery were free of arm swelling vs 69% of those with a long chronic AxSCV occlusion (P < .001). The patients who had undergone CDT at the initial diagnosis were 32% less likely to need AxSCV reconstruction at surgery (30% vs 44%; P = .034) and 60% less likely to have arm swelling at follow-up (5% vs 13%; P < .05) vs those who had not undergone CDT. ConclusionsParaclavicular decompression, external venolysis, and selective AxSCV reconstruction determined by intraoperative venography findings can provide successful and durable treatment for >90% of all patients with VTOS. Further work is needed to achieve earlier recognition of AxSCV thrombosis, prompt usage of CDT, and even more effective surgical treatment.

565. MOVING FROM OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY TO MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY: A PARADIGM SHIFT IN AN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL CENTER

Abstract Esophagectomy is a complex procedure that is traditionally associated with high morbidities. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has the benefits of reduced post-op complications and improved quality of life in comparison to open esophagectomy (OE). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of MIE vs OE since the advocation of MIE as the standard approach in an upper gastrointestinal center. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the institutional online databank. OE was the main approach for esophageal cancer between year 2015 to 2017, while MIE was the standard approach in 2020 to 2021. Patient’s demography, tumour’s characteristics, operative approach, perioperative outcomes such as operation time, blood loss, post-op length of hospital stay, number of lymph node yield, post-op morbidities and mortality were compared between the OE (Jan 2015 – Dec 2017) and the MIE (Jan 2020 – Dec 2021) group. 28 patients were included in this study, 15 in the OE group while 13 in the MIE group. Mean age was similar in both groups (60.4vs59.4). 46.7% were of squamous cell carcinoma in the OE group vs 76.9% of adenocarcinoma in the MIE group. Ivor-Lewis approach was more common in the OE group (53.3%vs38.5%). MIE was associated with shorter mean operative time (489.38minutes vs 526minutes), less blood loss (110ml vs 250ml), shorter length of stay post-op (10.38days vs 24.67days) and higher number of lymph node yield (44vs31.67). Post-op morbidity was lower in MIE (30.7%vs73.3%) with Clavien-dindo grade-III and above complication rate of 7.69% vs 26.67%. 90-day mortality was 0 in the MIE vs 1 in the OE group. MIE was associated with shorter operative time, higher number of lymph node yield, reduced post-op morbidity, mortality and shorter post-operative hospital stay in patients with esophageal cancer. The encouraging results marked the paradigm shift from OE to MIE in our center.

Comparative surgical outcomes of transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Surgical outcomes of patients with thyroid carcinoma who underwent transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) versus transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) were compared. Patients who underwent TOETVA or TORT between July 2016 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. TOETVA and TORT groups were propensity score-matched (1:1) based on age, sex, body mass index, surgical extent, tumor size, and presence of thyroiditis. A total of 185 patients underwent transoral thyroidectomy (142 TOETVA and 43 TORT). Final diagnoses consisted of 135 papillary and seven follicular thyroid carcinomas in the TOETVA group and 43 papillary thyroid carcinomas in the TORT group (p = 0.138). Mean operative time was shorter for the TOETVA group than the TORT group (106.3 vs. 158.9min, p < 0.001), whereas mean hospital stay was longer for the TOETVA group than the TORT group (2.2 vs. 1.9days, p = 0.031). After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group included 43 patients. Mean operative time was shorter in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (106.2 vs. 158.9min, p < 0.001), whereas mean hospital stay was longer in the TOETVA group (2.3 vs. 1.9days, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in vocal cord palsy incidences between the groups (one transient, one permanent in the TOETVA group vs. none in the TORT group, p = 0.359). The learning curve was 71 cases for TOETVA and 25 cases for TORT. TOETVA had shorter mean operative time, and TORT had shorter learning curve and shorter mean hospital stay. Surgeons should be familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure.

Comparison of vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for impacted upper ureteral stones.

To compare a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (VS-URS) with traditional ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (T-URS) for impacted upper ureteral stones and to better define the potential benefits of VS-URS. Between May 2019 and March 2021, 158 patients with impacted upper ureteral stones underwent ureteroscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy. Of these, 76 underwent VS-URS and 82 underwent T-URS. In VS-URS procedures, the vacuum suction device is composed of a 5F ureteral catheter and a tee joint. The ureteral catheter is linked to the vacuum aspirator by the sidearm of the tee joint, and a 200μm fiber is inserted through the tee joint and the ureteral catheter into the stone site for lithotripsy. When compared to the T-URS group, the VS-URS group had a shorter mean operation time (38.18 ± 6.37min vs. 46.65 ± 5.66min;P = 0.000), lower fever rate (3.9% vs. 14.6%; P < 0.022), less stone retropulsion (5.3% vs. 18.3%; P = 0.012), lower extra management rate (6.58% vs. 21.95%; P = 0.006), and a higher stone-free rate of the first postoperative day (88.2% vs. 72.0%;P = 0.011). There were no significant differences in stone-free rates 1month after surgery between groups (94.7% vs. 92.7%; P = 0.748). VS-URS is an effective modality for impacted upper ureteral stones, and has a shorter operating time, lower fever rate, less stone retropulsion, and a higher primary stone-free rate compared with T-URS.

Comparison Between the Bone Lid Technique and the Traditional Technique in Surgical Treatment of the Posterior Mandibular Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IntroductionCystic lesions of the jaws and the impacted teeth are two of the most common cases that require surgical intervention in oral and maxillofacial surgery; however, surgeons also frequently use a traditional technique that involves the removal of the buccal bone plate. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the bone lid technique and the traditional technique.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial included 20 patients who were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 each): the T group, in which the lesions were accessed using the traditional technique with classical rotating instruments, and the BL group, in which the lesions were accessed with the bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device, with repositioning of the buccal bone plate. Operative time, pain, edema, inferior alveolar nerve injury, and bone defect healing were measured during clinical and radiological follow-ups at 24 h, 72 h, one week, one month, and six months after the surgery.ResultsNormal soft tissue and bone healing were observed in all cases except one case in the BL group. The T group had a shorter mean operative time than the BL group. In terms of pain, edema, and inferior alveolar nerve injury, the groups did not differ statistically significantly. The percentage of bone defect healing was significantly greater in the BL group than in the T group after six months of follow-up.ConclusionThe bone lid technique performed using a piezoelectric device was effective and safe for managing lesions in the posterior mandibular region and was not associated with increased postoperative complications. The disadvantages of this technique include a longer operative time and the need for fixation tools in some cases. In contrast, this technique outperforms the traditional technique in terms of reducing bone loss and improving the healing of bone defects.

Does Dysmenorrhea Affect Clinical Features and Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Patients With Ovarian Endometriosis? A 12-Year Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

BackgroundTo examine and compare the differences in clinical characteristics and long-term postoperative outcomes of ovarian endometriomas (OMA) patients with and without dysmenorrhea, including data from at least 8 years of postoperative follow-up examinations.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 334 OMA patients, including their demographic and clinical data. Long-term follow-up record was also collected. All laparoscopic cystectomy procedures were performed by the same surgeon at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2009 and April 2013. Patients were divided into the dysmenorrhea and non-dysmenorrhea groups to perform the analysis of their preoperative characteristics, relevant surgical findings, and postoperative outcomes at the follow-up.ResultsOut of 334 OMA patients, 257 (76.9%) patients were allocated to the dysmenorrhea group, while the rest 77 (23.1%) patients were included in the non-dysmenorrhea group. Compared with the dysmenorrhea group, the non-dysmenorrhea group exhibited a reduced proportion of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) (P = 0.003), dyspareunia (P < 0.001), tenesmus (P < 0.001), concurrency of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) (P < 0.001), and adenomyosis (P = 0.032). Preoperative infertility was significantly higher in the dysmenorrhea group (P = 0.001). The mean operating time in the dysmenorrhea vs. the non-dysmenorrhea group was 68.0 vs. 56.0 min (P < 0.001). According to the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) scoring system, the mean scores of the two groups were 52.1 vs. 44.6 (P = 0.033). During follow-up, the dysmenorrhea group showed a higher rate of disease relapse (P < 0.001). A minimum postoperative follow-up period of 8 years was required to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes. Successful pregnancies were identified in 97/257 (37.7%) cases in the dysmenorrhea group and 36/77(46.8%) cases in the non-dysmenorrhea group (P = 0.157), respectively. Though the dysmenorrhea group had a higher rate of postoperative infertility, differences were not significant between the two groups.ConclusionsCompared with the dysmenorrhea group, OMA patients without dysmenorrhea exhibited lower proportions of CPP, dyspareunia, tenesmus, lower concurrency of DIE and adenomyosis, shorter mean operating time, lower mean rAFS scores, and lower infertility rates. During the long-term follow-up, a lower recurrence rate was observed in the non-dysmenorrhea group. Regarding fertility outcomes, non-dysmenorrhea patients had a higher likelihood of successful pregnancy after surgery. Postoperative management needs to be evaluated separately according to dysmenorrhea pathology.