Short-term Surgical Outcomes Research Articles

Comparative Analyses of the Outcomes Between Lobectomies and Trisegmentectomies/Lingulectomies in the Surgical Management of Clinical Stage I Left Upper Lobe Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Lobectomies are the standard surgical intervention for lung cancer; however, recently, surgeons have considered segmentectomies for smaller tumors, with their potential for favorable survival outcomes while preserving lung function. The surgical outcomes of trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies and lobectomies for clinical stage I left upper lobe (LUL) non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) remain undetermined. Thus, our study aimed to assess the differences between the short-term surgical and long-term survival outcomes in patients with clinical stage I LUL NSCLC who underwent trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies and those who underwent lobectomies. Between 2011 and 2021, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 377 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who had undergone LUL lobectomies or trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies. Patients were categorized into two subcohorts according to tumor size, i.e. 0-2 and 2-4 cm. To ensure preoperative demographic comparability, 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed. This study focused on the 2-4cm subcohort. Post-PSM, patients who underwent trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies had quicker operations and shorter postoperative hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay than those who underwent lobectomies. Post-PSM, no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were observed between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups in both the0-2 and 2-4cm subcohorts. The multivariate analysis revealed that different surgical methods were not statistically significant factors for either PFS or OS. Trisegmentectomies/lingulectomies are a feasible option for clinical stage I NSCLC, with better perioperative outcomes and similar survival rates when compared with LUL lobectomies.

Short-term surgical outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: A comparative, single-center, retrospective study.

Although laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) are gradually gaining popularity, their advantages over open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of OPD, LPD, and RPD to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. We retrospectively analyzed 16 LPD, 43 RPD, and 36 OPD procedures performed at a single center between April 2020 and May 2024. Clinical data, including operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RPD demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (553 min) than OPD (446 min) and LPD (453 min) but a significantly lower estimated blood loss than OPD (150 mL vs. 400 mL, p < .001). Postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) were lower for RPD (24.4%) than those for OPD (50.0%) and LPD (68.8%). RPD also showed a significantly lower rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (14.6% vs. 38.9% for OPD and 43.8% for LPD) and a shorter duration of hospitalization (11 vs. 28 days for OPD and 21 days for LPD, p < .001). Hospitalization costs were higher for RPD (20 109 USD) than for OPD (18 487 USD, p < .001), with LPD (20 496 USD) and RPD costs being similar. RPD appears to offer advantages in terms of reduced blood loss and postoperative complications and shortened hospital stay despite longer operative times and higher hospitalization costs. Therefore, RPD may be a more beneficial approach than OPD or LPD in pancreatic surgery.

Pathologic Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Pediatric Versus Adult Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Despite the rising incidence of pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), postoperative outcomes for such tumors have not been well-characterized. The objective of this study was to compare pathologic tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes for pediatric and adult patients with DTC. Retrospective case-control study. National database. Pediatric (<18 years old) and adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent surgery for DTC in the National Cancer Database (2004-2020) were included. Multivariable logistic, negative binomial, and linear regressions were used to compare pathologic tumor characteristics, treatment characteristics, and short-term surgical outcomes. 337,864 patients with DTC met the study eligibility criteria; 3584 (1.1%) were pediatric patients and 334,280 (98.9%) were adults. After adjustment, pediatric patients were found to have higher rates of pathologic T upstaging (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj]: 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-1.59), N upstaging (ORadj: 2.53, 95% CI: 2.23-2.88), and extrathyroidal extension (ORadj: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.29-1.94), compared to adult patients. Pediatric patients were also more likely to receive neck dissection (ORadj: 2.80, 95% CI: 2.55-3.07) and radioactive iodine (ORadj: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.30-1.55). Pediatric patients had higher rates of positive surgical margins (ORadj: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41) and 30-day readmissions (ORadj: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.00-1.58) than adult patients. These findings demonstrate that pediatric DTC is associated with more aggressive disease presentations, more radical treatment, and worse short-term surgical outcomes compared to DTC in adults. Pediatric DTC should be considered a unique clinical entity that requires personalized evaluation and multidisciplinary treatment by specialized providers.

Short-Term Surgical Outcomes After Robotic Liver Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis With Conventional Open Liver Surgery at a High-Volume Centre in Denmark.

The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative outcomes of robotic liver surgery (RLS) and Open liver surgery (OLS) in a centre with a high number of operations. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis of a retrospective database of RLS and OLS was performed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to identify learning curves. After PSM analysis, operative time was significantly longer in the RLS group (p<0.001). Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the RLS group (p<0.001). Transfusion rates were significantly lower in the RLS group. The length of hospital stay was shorter in the RLS group (3.5vs6.3days, p<0.001). Readmission rates were significantly lower in the RLS group (p<0.049). CUSUM analysis showed a learning curve for at least 8 low-intermediate RLS procedures and 27 advanced-Expert RLS procedures. RLS has many advantages, including being safe to perform, less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery compared with OLS.

K-Line Tilt May Influence the Short-Term Surgical Outcomes After Laminoplasty in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

A retrospective study. To explore the relationship between K-line tilt and short-term surgical outcomes following laminoplasty in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), and to evaluate the potential of K-line tilt as a reliable preoperative predictor. A retrospective analysis was performed for 125 consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty for multilevel DCM. The radiographic parameters utilized in this study encompassed T1 slope (T1S), C2-C7 lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis (T1S-CL), C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), and K-line tilt. The neurological recovery was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between K-line tilt and other classical cervical parameters. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the association between K-line tilt and surgical outcomes. Of the 125 patients, 89 were men. The mean age of the patients was 61.74 ± 11.31 years. The results indicated a correlation between the K-line tilt and the cSVA (r = 0.628, P < 0.001), T1S (r = 0.259, P = 0.004), and T1S-CL (r = 0.307, P < 0.001). The K-line tilt showed an association with the failure of the JOA recovery rate (RR) to reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the occurrence of postoperative kyphotic deformity. We identified cutoff values for the K-line tilt which predict the failure of the JOA RR to reach the MCID and postoperative kyphotic deformity as 10.13° and 9.93°, respectively. The K-line tilt is an independent preoperative risk factor associated with both the failure of the JOA RR to reach the MCID and the occurrence of postoperative kyphotic deformity in patients with multilevel DCM after laminoplasty.

Vascular-oriented D3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery preservation for distal sigmoid colon cancer: a variety of techniques.

One of the approaches to distal sigmoid colon cancer surgical treatment is segmental colonic resection with vascular preservation of left colic artery (LCA). D3 lymph node dissection may technically vary according to different vascular anatomy. This study aims to show the approaches to D3 lymph node dissection with LCA preservation for distal sigmoid colon cancer according to different patterns of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) branching. CTangiography with 3D reconstruction was routinely performed to identify the IMA branching pattern. Laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection with D3 lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation in standardized fashion was performed in all cases. Data, including clinical, intraoperative, and short-term surgical outcomes, is presented as median numbers (Me) and interquartile range (IQR). Twenty-six patients with distal sigmoid colon cancer were treated with laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection. The approach to D3 lymph node dissection varied according to different anatomical variations. There was one conversion (3.8%) and one anastomotic leakage (3.8%) in patients with high BMI. At the same time, there was a high apical lymph node count (Me 3 (IQR 2-5), min-max 0-10) due to the skeletonization of the IMA. The technical aspects of D3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery preservation may vary in different types of LCA and sigmoid artery branching patterns regardless of the standardized anatomical landmarks. The anatomical features should be considered when performing vascular-sparing lymph node dissection.

Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy with simultaneous transhiatal abdominal procedure for thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Minimally invasive robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy has been sporadically reported as a novel thoracic esophagectomy technique for patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Most reports indicate that the abdominal component of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy is performed sequentially after the cervical phase. However, if the cervical and abdominal phases are performed simultaneously using a nerve integrity monitoring system with no administration of muscle relaxants, there are two major advantages: a reduced risk of recurrent nerve palsy and a shorter operative time. We herein report our experience performing novel robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a simultaneous transhiatal abdominal approach using a nerve integrity monitoring system. Thirty cases of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy performed from 2023 to April 2024 were reviewed. The operative and short-term surgical outcomes of this procedure were compared with those of robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy using a sequential abdominal approach, and the feasibility and efficacy of the simultaneous procedure were analyzed. All patients successfully underwent robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy with no intraoperative adverse events. There were no differences in the patients' demographic or operative data between the two groups. There was no difference in the mean operation time for the cervical procedure (p = 0.23). However, there was a significant difference in the total time for the whole procedure (sequential group: 453.8 ± 26.8min, simultaneous group: 291.2 ± 36.1min; p < 0.01). There were no differences in postoperative surgical complications between the groups. There was also no difference in the total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (p = 0.33). Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy, a new technique for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible under intraoperative management using nerve integrity monitoring without muscle relaxants. This procedure facilitates intraoperative monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve activity, significantly shortening the total operative time.

Variability of morphology in photoplethysmographic waveform quantified with unsupervised wave-shape manifold learning for clinical assessment

Objective.We investigated fluctuations of the photoplethysmography (PPG) waveform in patients undergoing surgery. There is an association between the morphologic variation extracted from arterial blood pressure (ABP) signals and short-term surgical outcomes. The underlying physiology could be the numerous regulatory mechanisms on the cardiovascular system. We hypothesized that similar information might exist in PPG waveform. However, due to the principles of light absorption, the noninvasive PPG signals are more susceptible to artifacts and necessitate meticulous signal processing.Approach.Employing the unsupervised manifold learning algorithm, dynamic diffusion map, we quantified multivariate waveform morphological variations from the PPG continuous waveform signal. Additionally, we developed several data analysis techniques to mitigate PPG signal artifacts to enhance performance and subsequently validated them using real-life clinical database.Main results.Our findings show similar associations between PPG waveform during surgery and short-term surgical outcomes, consistent with the observations from ABP waveform analysis.Significance.The variation of morphology information in the PPG waveform signal in major surgery provides clinical meanings, which may offer new opportunity of PPG waveform in a wider range of biomedical applications, due to its non-invasive nature.

Effects of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Short-Term Surgical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional and Immunological Statuses: A Single-Institution Propensity Score-Matched Study.

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical impact of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) on postoperative nutritional and immunological indices. The surgical advantages of MIPD over OPD are controversial, and the postoperative nutritional and immunological statuses are unknown. In total, 306 patients who underwent MIPD (n = 120) or OPD (n = 186) for periampullary tumors from April 2016 to February 2024 were analyzed. Surgical outcomes and postoperative nutritional and immunological indices (albumin, prognostic nutritional index [PNI], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR]) were examined by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with well-matched background characteristics. PSM resulted in 2 balanced groups of 99 patients each. Compared with OPD, MIPD was significantly associated with less estimated blood loss (P < 0.0001), fewer intraoperative blood transfusions (P = 0.001), longer operative time, shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.0001), fewer postoperative complications (P = 0.001) (especially clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula [P = 0.018]), and a higher rate of textbook outcome achievement (70.7% vs 48.5%, P = 0.001). The number of dissected lymph nodes and the R0 resection rate did not differ between the 2 groups. In elective cases with textbook outcome achievement, the change rates of albumin, PNI, NLR, and PLR from before to after surgery were equivalent in both groups. MIPD has several surgical advantages (excluding a prolonged operative time), and it enhances the achievement of textbook outcomes over OPD. However, the postoperative nutritional and immunological statuses are equivalent for both procedures.

258. SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY ANALYZED USING NATIONAL CLINICAL DATABASE IN JAPAN

Abstract Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a highly invasive procedure in gastrointestinal surgery. The National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan starting data collection in 2011 has accumulated real world data of esophagectomy, one of the main nine gastroenterological surgeries for which detailed input items have been required for the evaluation of surgical mortality and postoperative complications. We herein reviewed the short-term outcomes after esophagectomy analyzed by Japanese nationwide big database. Many studies on esophagectomy, including investigations of quality indicators, feasibility of minimally invasive surgery, and various patients’ conditions, have been conducted using NCD. The validation of certification systems by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery (JSGS) and the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) revealed that the institute’s certification had greater influence on short-term surgical outcomes than the operating surgeon’s certification. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) can replace open esophagectomy (OE). MIE performed with no preoperative treatment was associated with significantly less incidence of any pulmonary morbidities, prolonged ventilation 48hours, unplanned intubation, surgical site infection, and sepsis. The total surgery-related mortality rates of MIE and OE were 1.7% and 2.4%, respectively (P &amp;lt; 0.001). The operative mortality in the elderly group with residual tumors increased to more than twice than that in the non-elderly groups (15.9 vs. 5.5 or 6.5%) and was much higher than that in elderly patients without residual tumors (15.9 vs. 4.6%). Careful selection is important for the treatment of elderly patients with highly advanced tumors to avoid unfavorable short-term outcomes. Thus, the NCD has contributed to quality assessment and improvement of surgery by feedback of accurate data in Japan.

798. FEASIBILITY AND EFFICACY OF CISPLATIN, PACLITAXEL AND IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS AS CONVERSION THERAPY FOR LOCOREGIONALLY UNRESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

Abstract Background Induction therapy followed by conversion surgery is potentially curative for locoregionally unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal induction treatment strategy is unclear. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of cisplatin, paclitaxel and immune checkpoint inhibitors as conversion therapy for locoregionally unresectable ESCC. Methods Clinicopathological variables of cT4b ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were retrieved from the prospective database of the Surgical Esophageal Cancer Patient Registry in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Enhanced computed tomography, ultrasonography and bronchoscopy were routinely used for the diagnosis. The treatment protocol of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy included 2 cycles of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy with the interval of 3 weeks among each cycle. All patients received 2 cycles of Pembrolizumab (200 mg, D1), Sintilimab (200 mg, D1), Tislelizumab (200 mg, D1) or Camrelizumab (200 mg, D1) intravenously. Concurrently all patients received 2 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m2 of body-surface area, D1) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 body-surface area, D1) intravenously. The perioperative parameters and short-term surgical outcomes were presented (Table). Results Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 317 ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery were screened. Twenty cT4b patients with middle or upper thoracic ESCC were finally enrolled in this study. Pretreatment tumor invades the trachea (4, 20%), left main bronchus (16, 80%), and aorta (6, 30%), respectively. All the patients were successfully performed by McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy except for one patient conversion to thoracotomy. R0 resection was achieved in 15 patients, 4 patients underwent R1 resection and 1 patient underwent R2 resection. Mean operation duration was 290.4 ± 57.5 min. Mean estimated blood loss was 94.4 ± 108.8 ml. Three patients had postoperative pneumonia, two patients had postoperative pleural effusion and one patient had postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. No patient had postoperative anastomotic leak. No postoperative reoperation was needed and there was no perioperative mortality. Mean length of hospital stay was 10.9±1.4 days. 90-day mortality occurred in one patient with postoperative multiple systemic metastasis. Fifteen patients are alive with a median follow up of 18 months. One patient died with regional lymph node recurrence and three patients died with hematogenous dissemination. Conclusion Multimodal treatment strategy combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy may convert unresectable tumors into potentially operable ones, and achieved favorable survival. Longer follow-up and larger sample size are needed to verify our preliminary results.

Efficacy and safety of robotic liver surgery for the elderly: A propensity-score matched analysis of short-term outcomes with open liver surgery at a single center in Denmark.

The incidence of liver tumors requiring surgical treatment continues to increase in elderly patients. This study compared the short-term results of robotic liver surgery (RLS) versus open liver surgery (OLS) for liver tumors in elderly patients. A prospective database including all patients undergoing liver surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital between July 2019 and July 2022 was managed retrospectively. Short-term surgical outcomes of the two main cohorts (OLS and RLS) and subgroups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) in elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with liver tumors. A total of 42 matched patients from each group were investigated: the RLS group had significantly larger tumor diameters, less blood loss (821.2 vs. 155.2 mL, p < .001), and shorter hospital stays (6.6 vs. 3.4 days, p < .001). Overall morbidity was comparable, while operative times were longer in the RLS group. The advantages observed with the robotic approach were replicated in the subgroup of minor liver resections. In patients ≥70 years, RLS for liver tumors results in significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays than OLS. RLS, especially minor liver resection, is safe and feasible in elderly patients with liver tumors.

Outcome research on esophagectomy analyzed using nationwide databases in Japan: evidences generated from real-world data.

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a highly invasive gastrointestinal surgical procedure. The National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan, initiated in 2011, has compiled real-world data on esophagectomy, one of nine major gastroenterological surgeries. This review examines outcomes after esophagectomy analyzed using the Japanese big databases. Certification systems by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery (JSGS) and the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) have shown that institutional certification has a greater impact on short-term surgical outcomes than surgeon certification. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged as a viable alternative to open esophagectomy, although careful patient selection is crucial, especially for elderly patients with advanced tumors. The NCD has significantly contributed to the assessment and enhancement of surgical quality and short-term outcomes, while studies based on Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan (CRECJ) have provided data on patient characteristics, treatments, and long-term outcomes. The JES has conducted various questionnaire-based retrospective clinical reviews in collaboration with authorized institutions certified by JES. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database provides administrative claims data including itemized prices for surgical, pharmaceutical, laboratory, and other inpatient services. Analyzing these nationwide databases can offer precise insights into surgical quality for esophageal cancer, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes.

Feasibility and outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with preexisting colostomy

BackgroundDiverting colostomy followed by neoadjuvant treatment is a treatment of choice for obstructive rectal cancer. Such patients may be treated via a robotic approach with several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conversely, the existing stoma may interfere with the optimal trocar position and thus affect the quality of robotic surgery. Moreover, the console surgeon does not face the patient, which may endanger the stoma.MethodsPatients with rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery were retrospectively investigated using a robotic platform after neoadjuvant treatment at our hospital. Based on pretreatment stoma creation, patients were divided into the NS (those without a stoma) and S groups (patients with a stoma). Baseline characteristics, types of neoadjuvant treatment, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative anorectal manometric data, and survival were compared between the groups.ResultsThe NS and S groups comprised 65 and 9 patients, respectively. Conversion to laparotomy was required in three patients in the NS group. The S group required a longer console time than the NS group (median: 367 vs. 253 min, respectively, p = 0.038); however, no difference was observed in the total operative time (p = 0.15) and blood loss (p = 0.70). Postoperative complication rates, anorectal function, and oncological outcomes were similar between the groups.ConclusionsAlthough console time was longer in patients with a stoma, robotic surgery could be performed safely like in those without a stoma after neoadjuvant treatment.

Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a matched-pair study

BackgroundReports from case series suggest that operative outcomes are comparable amongst different age groups following surgery with curative intent for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to compare morbidity and mortality after NSCLC surgery in older patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) and identify independent predictive risk factors.MethodsWe identified 2015 patients with postoperative stages IA to IIIA according to AJCC/UICC 7th edition who had undergone NSCLC surgery with curative intent at a single specialized lung cancer center from January 2010 to December 2015. A matched-pair analysis was performed on 227 older patients and corresponding 227 younger patients. Short-term surgical outcomes were postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality. Long-term operative outcomes were disease-free and overall survival.Results454 patients were included in the matched-pair analysis. 36% of younger patients developed postoperative complications versus 42% in older patients (p = 0.163). Age was not significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days in older patients and 13 days in younger patients (p = 0.185). 90-day mortality was 2.2% in younger patients compared to 4% in older patients (p = 0.424). In patients aged 75 and older impaired performance status (ECOG ≥ 1) was associated with decreased overall survival (HR = 2.15, CI 1.34–3.46), as were preoperative serum C-reactive protein / albumin ratio ≥ 0.3 (HR = 1.95, CI 1.23–3.11) and elevated preoperative serum creatinine levels ≥ 1.1 mg/dl (HR = 1.84, CI 1.15–2.95). In the younger cohort male sex (HR = 2.26, CI 1.17–4.36), postoperative stage III disease (HR 4.61, CI 2.23–9.54) and preoperative anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dl) (HR 2.09, CI 1.10–3.96) were associated with decreased overall survival.ConclusionsLung resection for NSCLC in older patients is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality comparable to those of younger patients. In older patients, physical activity, comorbidities and nutritional status are related to survival and should influence the indication for surgery rather than age alone.

Perioperative Outcomes and Reimbursement Patterns Associated With the Anterior versus Posterior Approach for Treatment of Type 2 Odontoid Fractures, a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

To evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes and the reimbursement patterns, after treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures using the anterior or posterior approach. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for surgically treated patients with type 2 odontoid fractures by the anterior or posterior approach between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score matching with the optimal approach was used to balance the cohorts. A total of 96 patients in the anterior and 352 patients in the posterior surgery group were included in the unmatched analysis. After propensity score matching 1:1, 96 anterior and 96 posterior cases were included in the matched analysis. Operative times were shorter in the anterior group (92.0 vs. 145.0minutes, P < 0.001). The need for intraoperative or postoperative transfusions was higher in the posterior group (15% vs. 2.1%; P= 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in complications between groups (P > 0.05). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the posterior group (4.5days vs. 3.0; P= 0.049). Nonroutine discharge was more frequent in the posterior group (55% vs. 40%, P= 0.030). However, the rate of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). Also, the work relative value units were significantly higher in the anterior group (22.7 vs. 20.6, P < 0.001), indicating higher reimbursement trends for this approach. In this matched analysis, the anterior approach for type 2 odontoid fractures was superior to the posterior approach. The anterior approach was associated with significantly shorter operation times, hospital stays, fewer transfusions, nonroutine discharges, and higher reimbursements.

Predictors of Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV or Grade V Complications after Metastatic Spinal Tumor Surgery: An Analysis of Sociodemographic, Socioeconomic, Clinical, Oncologic, and Operative Parameters.

The rate of major complications and 30-day mortality after surgery for metastatic spinal tumors is relatively high. While most studies have focused on baseline comorbid conditions and operative parameters as risk factors, there is limited data on the influence of other parameters such as sociodemographic or socioeconomic data on outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed data from 165 patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases between 2012-2023. The primary outcome was development of major complications (i.e., Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV complications), and the secondary outcome was 30-day mortality (i.e., Clavien-Dindo Grade V complications). An exploratory data analysis that included sociodemographic, socioeconomic, clinical, oncologic, and operative parameters was performed. Following multivariable analysis, independent predictors of Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV complications were Frankel Grade A-C, lower modified Bauer score, and lower Prognostic Nutritional Index. Independent predictors of Clavien-Dindo Grade V complications) were lung primary cancer, lower modified Bauer score, lower Prognostic Nutritional Index, and use of internal fixation. No sociodemographic or socioeconomic factor was associated with either outcome. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors did not impact short-term surgical outcomes for metastatic spinal tumor patients in this study. Optimization of modifiable factors like nutritional status may be more important in improving outcomes in this complex patient population.

No Difference in Short-Term Surgical Outcomes from Semaglutide Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus after Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Retrospective cohort. To evaluate the impact of semaglutide treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) on the risk of short-term (<6 months) postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary cervical spine decompression and fusion (CSDF). Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, is gaining popularity as a weekly injectable medication for the treatment of T2DM and obesity. Existing research indicates that higher levels of HbA1c and obesity are linked to fewer positive results after undergoing spine surgery, particularly cervical decompression and fusion. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of publications evaluating the influence of semaglutide therapy on surgical complications, including surgical site infection, wound complications, and reoperation within 6 months, which were aggregated into a composite measure. The PearlDiver Database was queried from January 2010 to December 2021 for patients with a primary diagnosis of T2DM who underwent CSDF for degenerative pathology. Patients with semaglutide treatment within 6 months before index surgery were propensity score-matched to patients without the treatment, employing age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) as matching covariates. A multivariate regression model was used to investigate the impact of semaglutide treatment on postoperative surgical complications. The propensity score-matched cohort included 596 patients (semaglutide cohort: 298, control cohort: 298). There were no statistically significant differences between cohorts in the composite measure of postoperative surgical complications following index CSDF (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.83-1.93, P=0.331). Similarly, both 30-day (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.49-1.42, P=0.589) and 90-day readmission rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.42, P=0.724) were similar between both cohorts. This study suggests that in patients with T2DM, semaglutide treatment is not associated with higher rates of short-term adverse events after CSDF. The effect of semaglutide use on long-term outcomes remains unknown.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Nutritional Status Between Early and Late Oral Feeding After Esophagectomy: An Open Labeled Randomized Controlled Trial.

To compare nutritional and postoperative outcomes between early oral feeding and late oral feeding with jejunostomy feeding support after esophagectomy. Esophagectomy is associated with substantial body weight loss and malnutrition, impacting the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients. Despite many studies on post-esophagectomy nutritional support, optimal strategies remain elusive. This study investigates the impact of jejunostomy feeding with late oral feeding compared to conventional oral feeding on nutritional and postoperative outcomes. We performed a single-center prospective open-labelled randomized controlled trial between 2020 and 2022. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with resectable esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to undergo either early oral feeding (early group) or late oral feeding with jejunostomy feeding support (late group) after esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was body weight loss from preoperative body weight at postoperative 4-5 weeks and 4 months. Other perioperative and nutritional outcomes were also evaluated. We randomly assigned 29 patients to the early group and 29 patients to the late group. The late group exhibited significantly less body weight loss at both postoperative 4-5 weeks (8.3% vs. 5.6%; P =0.002) and 4 months (15.0% vs. 10.5%; P =0.003). The total calorie intake and protein intake were higher in the late group for both postoperative 4-5 weeks (1800kcal/day vs. 1100kcal/day; P <0.001) and 4 months (1565kcal/day vs. 1200kcal/day; P =0.010). Sixty percentage of early group changed to malnutrition state, while 40% of the late group changed to malnutrition. The complication rate and length of hospital stays were similar. The late group demonstrated prevention of significant body weight loss, enhanced nutritional intake, and reduces malnutrition without compromising short-term surgical outcomes.

Total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method for esophageal cancer.

Thoracic esophageal cancer surgery using robotic approaches for the thoracic and abdominal parts has recently been reported as total robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). We herein present the first report of a new technique for esophageal cancer: total RAMIE with three-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) by a simultaneous two-team approach using a new docking method. We reviewed 20 patients who underwent total RAMIE with 3FLND by a simultaneous two-team approach at the National Cancer Center East Hospital from March 2023 to September 2023. Short-term surgical outcomes and the safety and efficacy of this technique were analyzed. The mean operative time for abdominal surgery with this new docking technique was 135 ± 19.6min. The total operative time was 488 ± 42.9min, and the time from the end of abdominal manipulation to the end of surgery was 80.1 ± 15.6min. The intraoperative blood loss was 116.7 ± 64.4mL. The incidence of anastomotic leakage, postoperative vocal cord paralysis, and postoperative pneumonia was 10%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14days (range 11-63days). No in-hospital deaths occurred, and R0 resection was possible in all cases. The average number of lymph nodes dissected was 87.7. These results demonstrate that total RAMIE with a simultaneous two-team approach using the new docking method can be safely introduced. The simultaneous cervical and abdominal manipulation with the new docking method allowed total RAMIE without prolonging the operating time, suggesting that it may be a valuable approach for esophageal cancer surgery.