Short-term Randomized Controlled Trials Research Articles

OP92 Impact Of Real-World Evidence On Health Technology Assessment And National Guidance For Interventional Procedures: A UK Perspective

IntroductionThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) interventional procedures programme (IPP) issues guidance on the safety and efficacy of new interventional procedures (IPS). The IPP considers a range of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to case series to make final recommendations. Real-world evidence (RWE) can provide additional information on long-term outcomes and patient population characteristics that are not easily captured by RCTs. This study explores the impact of RWE in complementing RCTs on long-term safety and efficacy for national guidance development.MethodsWe review the impact of RWE in IPS guidance (IPG) updates and change in guidance recommendations in the last 5 years. This is done by analyzing NICE guidance updates and supporting evidence. A range of RWE was considered in the supporting evidence, for example, registries and clinical audits.ResultsThe addition of RWE evidence to IPP guidance update has led to significant changes in the recommendations. For example, in one recent IPG, standard arrangements recommendation based on short-term RCT evidence was changed to a research recommendation when RWE showed an increase in long-term adverse effects. In another recent IPG update, special arrangements recommendation based on short-term RCT evidence was changed to a research recommendation when RWE reported long-term inferior efficacy and safety for the new intervention compared to current standard of care. A complete overview of results of the last 5 years will also be presented at the meeting.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that increased availability of RWE in HTA has the potential to impact national guidance recommendations. In addition, it shows how RWE can fill the evidence base gaps created by RCTs. Such data can confirm or contradict the findings of RCTs, or generate questions needing further research, or support disinvestment in non-effective technologies.

Safety and efficacy of compounded bioidentical hormone therapy (cBHT) in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

More information is needed about the efficacy and safety of compounded bioidentical hormone therapy (cBHT) in the published literature. A thorough synthesis of existing data is not currently available. To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing evidence related to the safety and efficacy of commonly prescribed cBHT preparations in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cBHT with a placebo or FDA-approved products in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women were eligible. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary safety outcome was changes in lipid profile and glucose metabolism, and the primary efficacy outcome was the change of vaginal atrophy symptoms. The secondary outcomes included the change of endometrial thickness, risk of adverse events, vasomotor symptoms, change of serum hormone levels, and change of bone mineral density. A total of 29 RCTs reported in 40 articles containing 1,808 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women were included. Two risk factors of cardiovascular disease, lipid profile, and glucose metabolism, were evaluated with cBHT. The results showed that compounded androgen was not associated with change of lipid profile or glucose metabolism. There was no change in endometrial thickness or serious adverse events. There were more androgenic side effects with compounded dehydroepiandrosterone compared with placebo as expected. Other safety measures including clinical cardiovascular events, endometrial biopsy, and risk of breast cancer were not studied. cBHT in the form of compounded vaginal androgen was found to significantly improve vaginal atrophy symptoms (SMD -0.66 [95% CI, -1.28 to -0.04]; I2 = 86.70%). This finding was supported by the association between compounded vaginal androgen and improved female sexual function scores. The changes of serum hormone levels were also evaluated. Despite the variations in absorption from different types of compounded hormones, routes, and strengths, the trends were consistent with published data from FDA-approved products. This review found that cBHT used in primarily short-term RCTs is not associated with adverse changes in lipid profile or glucose metabolism. cBHT in the form of vaginal androgens appears beneficial for vaginal atrophy symptoms. There are insufficient RCTs of cBHT to assess clinical risk of breast cancer, endometrial cancer, or cardiovascular disease. Long-term studies with clinical endpoints are needed.

Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

Given the lack of head‐to‐head studies of systemic therapies in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD), network meta‐analyses (NMAs) can provide comparative efficacy and safety data to inform clinical decision‐making. In this NMA, eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before 24 October 2019 were identified by a systematic literature review. Short‐term (12–16 weeks) efficacy (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] and Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] responses), patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) and safety data from each trial were abstracted and analysed separately for monotherapy and combination therapy (systemic plus topical anti‐inflammatory therapy). RCTs were analysed in fixed‐effects and random‐effects Bayesian NMA models. Overall, 19 phase 2 and phase 3 RCTs of abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, tralokinumab and upadacitinib were included. In monotherapy RCTs, upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) had the numerically highest efficacy (83.6% achieved ≥50% improvement in EASI [EASI‐50 response]), followed by abrocitinib 200 mg QD (74.6%), upadacitinib 15 mg QD (70.5%), dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) (63.4%) and abrocitinib 100 mg QD (56.7%). Similar trends in EASI‐75 and EASI‐90 response were observed. In combination therapy RCTs, abrocitinib 200 mg QD had the highest EASI‐50 (86.6%), followed by dupilumab 300 mg Q2W (82.4%) and abrocitinib 100 mg QD (79.7%). Similar findings were observed for IGA response and PROs. In monotherapy and combination therapy RCTs, the probability of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher among all active treatments than with placebo (except for dupilumab 300 mg Q2W [odds ratio (OR), 0.96; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.45–2.18] and abrocitinib 100 mg QD [OR, 0.95; 95% CrI, 0.35–2.66] in combination therapy RCTs), although active treatments did not significantly differ from one another. Abrocitinib, dupilumab and upadacitinib were consistently the most effective systemic therapies in adult and adolescent patients with AD, with no significant TEAE differences in short‐term RCTs.

Ultra-processed foods and human health: What do we already know and what will further research tell us?

Ultra-processed foods and human health: What do we already know and what will further research tell us?

Mendelian randomization in COVID-19: Applications for cardiovascular comorbidities and beyond.

Mendelian randomization in COVID-19: Applications for cardiovascular comorbidities and beyond.

Почему никорандил не рассматривается как антиангинальный препарат первой линии

According to the results of several short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nicorandil is not inferior in its antianginal efficacy to beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB) and long-acting nitrates (LAN). At the same time, in some short-term RCTs, as well as in the long-term RCT IONA (2002), it was shown that antianginal efficacy of nicorandil as monotherapy or in combination with other antianginal drugs did not differ from placebo. Ability of nicorandil to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, demonstrated in the RCT IONA, requires confirmation in a long-term trial with a stronger primary endpoint and concomitant treatment that would meet the current guidelines for the management of patients with chronic coronary syndromes. In this regard, and also taking into account the proven ability of nicorandil to cause gastrointestinal ulcerations, European experts currently consider nicorandil as a drug that is inferior in priority of choice to the first-line antianginal drugs (BB, CCB) and, in some cases, to the second-line drugs (LAN, ivabradine, ranolazine, trimetazidine).

How Many Patients With Schizophrenia Do Not Respond to Antipsychotic Drugs in the Short Term? An Analysis Based on Individual Patient Data From Randomized Controlled Trials.

An important clinical question is how many patients with acute schizophrenia do not respond to antipsychotics despite being treated for adequate time and with an effective dose. However, up to date, the exact extent of the phenomenon remains unclear. We calculated the nonresponse and nonremission percentages using individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six thousand two hundred twenty-one patients were assigned to one antipsychotic (amisulpride, flupenthixol, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone) at an adequate dose; the response was assessed at 4-6 weeks. As various definitions of nonresponse have been used in the literature, we applied 4 different cut-offs covering the whole range of percent Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)/Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) reduction (≤0%, <25%, <50%, <75%).For symptomatic remission, we used the definition proposed by Andreasen without employing the time criterion. The overall nonresponse for the cut-off of ≤0% PANSS/BPRS reduction was 19.8% (18.8%-20.8%); for the cut-off of <25% reduction it was 43% (41.7%-44.3%); for the cut-off of <50% reduction it was 66.5% (65.3%-67.8%); and for the cut-off of <75% reduction it was 87% (86%-87.9%). The overall percentage of no symptomatic remission was 66.9% (65.7%-68.1%). Earlier onset of illness, lower baseline severity and the antipsychotic used were significantly associated with higher nonresponse percentages. Nonresponse and nonremission percentages were notably high. Nevertheless, the patients in our analysis could represent a negative selection since they came from short-term RCTs and could have been treated before study inclusion; thus, further response may not have been observed. Observational studies on this important question are needed.

Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.

Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.

A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to systematically review dextrose (d-glucose) prolotherapy efficacy in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain.DATA SOURCESElectronic databases PubMed, Healthline, OmniMedicalSearch, Medscape, and EMBASE were searched from 1990 to January 2016.STUDY SELECTIONProspectively designed studies that used dextrose as the sole active prolotherapy constituent were selected.DATA EXTRACTIONTwo independent reviewers rated studies for quality of evidence using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database assessment scale for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Downs and Black evaluation tool for non-RCTs, for level of evidence using a modified Sackett scale, and for clinically relevant pain score difference using minimal clinically important change criteria. Study population, methods, and results data were extracted and tabulated.DATA SYNTHESISFourteen RCTs, 1 case–control study, and 18 case series studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Pain conditions were clustered into tendinopathies, osteoarthritis (OA), spinal/pelvic, and myofascial pain. The RCTs were high-quality Level 1 evidence (Physiotherapy Evidence Database ≥8) and found dextrose injection superior to controls in Osgood–Schlatter disease, lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, traumatic rotator cuff injury, knee OA, finger OA, and myofascial pain; in biomechanical but not subjective measures in temporal mandibular joint; and comparable in a short-term RCT but superior in a long-term RCT in low back pain. Many observational studies were of high quality and reported consistent positive evidence in multiple studies of tendinopathies, knee OA, sacroiliac pain, and iliac crest pain that received RCT confirmation in separate studies. Eighteen studies combined patient self-rating (subjective) with psychometric, imaging, and/or biomechanical (objective) outcome measurement and found both positive subjective and objective outcomes in 16 studies and positive objective but not subjective outcomes in two studies. All 15 studies solely using subjective or psychometric measures reported positive findings.CONCLUSIONUse of dextrose prolotherapy is supported for treatment of tendinopathies, knee and finger joint OA, and spinal/pelvic pain due to ligament dysfunction. Efficacy in acute pain, as first-line therapy, and in myofascial pain cannot be determined from the literature.

Number needed to harm in the post-marketing safety evaluation: results for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.

Our aim is to investigate the usefulness of metric indices in post-marketing safety evaluations by estimating number needed to harm (NNH) values for cardiovascular (CV) adverse outcomes for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. Reports from regulatory authorities (RAs) were consulted, and Medline searches were performed to identify studies assessing CV risks [all-cause death, CV death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or congestive heart failure (CHF)] for thiazolidinediones. Meta-analyses were performed to pool evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OS). NNHs [with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] per year were estimated for CV adverse events. Reports from RAs included two meta-analyses of short-term RCTs, two long-term RCTs (RECORD and PROACTIVE), and a systematic review of OS (n = 29). The Medline search identified six additional OS. Statistically significant NNH values were obtained for the following: (i) rosiglitazone versus control on MI and CHF in the meta-analysis of RCTs (NNH = 16; 95%CI = 10-255; and NNH = 7; 95%CI = 5-16, respectively) and meta-analysis of OS (NNH = 12; 95%CI = 9-20; and NNH = 5; 95%CI = 32-131, respectively) and on CHF in the RECORD (NNH = 6; 95%CI = 4-14); (ii) pioglitazone versus control on CHF (NNH = 11; 95%CI = 6, 403) in the meta-analysis of RCTs and PROACTIVE (NNH = 12; 95%CI = 8-43); and (iii) rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone on MI (NNH = 69; 95%CI = 32-379), stroke (NNH = 36; 95%CI = 20-225), CHF (NNH = 33; 95%CI = 19-47), and all-cause death (NNH = 63; 95%CI = 49-100) in the meta-analysis of OS. The NNH values suggested an increased CV risk with rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone across several sources of information. The inclusion of objective metrics in post-marketing drug's benefit-risk assessments could be of increased value and help RAs to make consistent decisions on drug safety.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Primary Restless Legs Syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a neurological disorder characterized by unpleasant sensations in the legs and a distressing, irresistible urge to move them. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate efficacy, safety, and comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments for primary RLS. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, reporting efficacy outcomes and harms of pharmacologic treatments for primary RLS of at least 4 weeks' duration. MEDLINE and other databases were searched through June 2012. Reviewers extracted outcomes and adverse events and rated the strength of evidence. We identified 29 eligible RCTs. We found high-strength evidence that the proportion of patients who had a clinically important response (International Restless Legs Syndrome [IRLS] responders), defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in mean IRLS symptom scale scores, was greater with dopamine agonist therapy compared with placebo (61% vs 41%) (risk ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.38-1.86]; 7 trials). Dopamine agonists also improved patient-reported sleep scale scores and quality-of-life measures. High-strength evidence demonstrated that calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands increased the proportion of IRLS responders compared with placebo (61% vs 37%) (risk ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.33-2.09]; 3 trials). Adverse events associated with dopamine agonists included nausea, vomiting, and somnolence. Alpha-2-delta ligands adverse events included somnolence and unsteadiness or dizziness. On the basis of short-term RCTs that enrolled highly selected populations with long-term high-moderate to very severe symptoms, dopamine agonists and calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands reduced RLS symptoms and improved sleep outcomes and disease-specific quality of life. Adverse effects and treatment withdrawals due to adverse effects were common.

Treatment of adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders

We aimed to review literature on the efficacy and tolerability of psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions in youth with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders (EOS). A rationale for pragmatic psychopharmacology in EOS, including dosing, switching and adverse effect monitoring and management, is provided. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the last 8 years demonstrated benefits of psychosocial interventions (i.e. psychoeducation, cognitive remediation, cognitive behavioural therapy) for EOS without clear advantages of one psychosocial treatment over another. Six large, placebo-controlled, short-term RCTs over the last 4 years demonstrated that aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine and risperidone, but not ziprasidone, were superior to placebo. Except for clozapine's superiority in treatment-refractory EOS, efficacy appeared similar across studied first-generation and second-generation antipsychotics, but tolerability varied greatly across individual agents. Antipsychotics are efficacious in the treatment of EOS. Given the lack of efficacy differences between antipsychotics (except for clozapine for treatment-refractory EOS), we propose that tolerability considerations need to guide choice of antipsychotics. Further and longer-term efficacy and effectiveness studies are urgently needed that should also explore pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic augmentation strategies.

What is the role of rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy?

Evaluation of: Ruggenenti P, Cravedi P, Chianca A et al. Rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 1416–1425 (2012).Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is controversial. However, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported that treatment with steroids alternated with an alkylating agent achieved significantly more remissions and better renal survival at 10 years in comparison with untreated controls. Short-term RCT with other treatments also reported a high rate of remission. In a nonrandomized trial, rituximab was used in 100 patients with IMN, and obtained complete remission in 27 patients and partial remission in 38 patients after a mean follow-up of 29 months. However, four patients progressed to end-stage renal disease and four died. These results are important; however, large RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better evaluate the role of this expensive treatment in IMN.

Long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with stimulants and atomoxetine in adult ADHD: A review of controlled and naturalistic studies

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common disorder of childhood that often persists into adulthood. Although stimulant medications are recommended as the first-line treatment for ADHD because of their documented short-term effects in children and adults, less is known about their effects on long-term outcome in adults. Here we review the long-term efficacy and safety of the stimulant drugs methylphenidate and amphetamine, as well as the related compound atomoxetine. We performed a systematic review to identify direct and indirect effects of stimulant therapy on long-term outcome in adults. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 10 open-label extension studies of initial short-term RCTs, with total follow-up of at least 24weeks, were identified. All these RCTs found that medication was significantly more efficacious than placebo in treating ADHD in adults, and the extension studies showed that this favorable effect of medication was maintained during the open-label follow-up period. However, since the maximum duration of these pharmacological trials was 4years, we also reviewed 18 defined naturalistic longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, to provide more information about longer term functional outcomes, side effects and complications. These observational studies also showed positive correlations between early recognition of the disorder, stimulant treatment during childhood and favorable long-term outcome in adult ADHD patients. In conclusion, stimulant therapy of ADHD has long-term beneficial effects and is well tolerated. However, more longitudinal studies of long duration should be performed. In addition, the ethical issues involved in performing double blind RCTs of many years duration should be further explored.

The contribution of pharmacoepidemiology to the antidepressant-suicidality debate in children and adolescents

A number of concerns have recently been raised about whether or not antidepressant medications are associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviour in children and adolescents. These concerns are based largely on results of meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). Controversy exists about generalizing evidence from short-term RCTs, designed primarily to test efficacy outcomes, to routine practice settings. Pharmacoepidemiological studies complement RCTs by using observational methods to examine safety and effectiveness of medications in the general population. This article reviews the contribution of pharmacoepidemiology to the controversy surrounding suicide risk in children and adolescents taking antidepressants, noting how variations in study design and adjustment for potential confounding factors influence outcome.

Suicide Rates in Short-term Randomized Controlled Trials of Newer Antidepressants

Concerns have been raised about the appropriateness of placebo controls in clinical trials for major depressive disorder (MDD), given that there are approved treatments for this illness. Critics have argued that patients with untreated depression would be exposed to an unnecessary risk of suicide. There is also a competing concern that antidepressant drug treatment itself may induce suicidal behavior and thinking (suicidality). To examine this question, we have evaluated the rate of suicide in placebo- and active drug-treated groups of patients with MDD and various anxiety disorders participating in short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We examined data from all manufacturer-sponsored short-term RCTs of 9 commonly used antidepressants in patients with MDD and various anxiety disorders. All short-term RCTs of antidepressants in patients with MDD and various anxiety disorders were included. Individual patients' data were available for all trials. Data were available for the 207 trials conducted in patients with MDD, including a total of 40,028 patients. There were 21 cases of suicide in these patients. Forty-four trials were conducted in patients with various anxiety disorders, including a total of 10,972 patients. There were 2 cases of suicide in these patients. Overall, at least 1 case of suicide occurred in 21 of the 251 trials. Sixteen of the suicides in MDD trials occurred in trials that had only an active control comparison group, and most of these (14 cases) were observed in the non-North American trials. In the placebo-controlled MDD trials, the rate ratios of suicide in the combined drug groups compared with placebo were 1.07 (0.1-63.4) and 0.5 (0.0-36.7) for the non-North American and North American trials, respectively. In the anxiety disorder studies, the overall rate ratio of suicide for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with placebo was 0.9 (0.0-71.4). Neither use of placebo nor of antidepressants in short-term RCTs was associated with an increased risk of completed suicide among patients with MDD or various anxiety disorders. Nonetheless, because of the small numbers of suicides in these trials and the subsequent lack of statistical power, an increased risk of completed suicide in association with either drug or placebo treatment cannot be definitively excluded.