Short-term Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

Opioid-Sparing Nonsteroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs Protocol in Patients Undergoing Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Control Trial.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective analgesics commonly used in fracture management. Although previously associated with delayed fracture healing, multiple studies have demonstrated their safety, with minimal risks of fracture healing. Given the current opioid crisis in the United States, alternate pain control modalities are essential to reduce opioid consumption. This study aims to determine whether the combination of oral acetaminophen and intravenous ketorolac is a viable alternative to opioid-based pain management in closed tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. We conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating postoperative pain control and opioid consumption in patients with closed tibial shaft fractures who underwent intramedullary nailing. Patients were randomized into an NSAID-based pain control group (52 patients) and an opioid-based pain control group (44 patients). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were evaluated at 12-hour postoperative intervals during the first 48 hours after surgery. Nonunion and delayed healing rates were recorded for both groups. A statistically significant decrease in MMEs was noted at every measured interval (12, 24, 36, and 48 hours) in the NSAID group compared with the opioid group ( P -value 0.001, 0.001, 0.040, 0.024, respectively). No significant change in visual analog scale scores was observed at 12, 36, and 48 hours between both groups ( P -value 0.215, 0.12, and 0.083, respectively). A significant decrease in VAS scores was observed at the 24-hour interval in the NSAID group compared with the opioid group ( P -value 0.041). No significant differences in union rates were observed between groups ( P -value 0.820). Using an NSAID-based postoperative pain protocol led to a decrease in opioid consumption without affecting pain scores or union rates. Owing to the minimal risk of short-term NSAID use, their role in the perioperative management of tibia shaft fractures is justified, especially when they reduce opioid consumption markedly. Therapeutic Level I.

Risk of heart failure following short-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Abstract Background Fluid retention is a known but underappreciated side-effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. As type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been linked to both subclinical cardiomyopathy and a decline in kidney function, short-term NSAID use could lead to subsequently development of heart failure (HF) due to aberrations in fluid balances. Purpose We investigated associations between short-term NSAID use and the risk of HF in a nationwide cohort of patients with T2DM. Methods Using nationwide Danish registers, we identified patients diagnosed with T2DM during 1998–2018. Follow-up began 120 days after first-time T2DM diagnosis among patients without prior heart failure or a rheumatological diagnosis indicating long-term NSAID use. To describe use of NSAID among patients with T2DM, we reported proportions of patients claiming at least 1, 2, 3 or 4 prescriptions of NSAID within one year of start of follow-up. We investigated associations between use of NSAIDs (celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen and naproxen) and new-onset HF hospitalizations using a case-crossover design with 28-day exposure windows and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The case-crossover design uses each individual as his or her own control making it suitable to study the effect of short-term exposure on immediate events while mitigating unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analyses using exposure windows of 14 and 42 days were performed as well. Results A total of 334,950 patients with T2DM was included (47.7% female, median age of 61 [interquartile range 50–70]). Celecoxib and naproxen were rarely used; on the contrary, prescriptions of diclofenac and ibuprofen were claimed at least once within one year from the beginning of follow-up by 4.9% and 15.5% of patients, respectively–0.9% and 2.7% claimed at least four prescriptions (Figure 1). The risk of new-onset HF hospitalization was increased following use of diclofenac or ibuprofen with corresponding ORs of 1.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.7) and 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5) using 28-day exposure windows. An increased risk following use of celecoxib or naproxen was not found (Figure 2). Conclusion NSAIDs diclofenac and ibuprofen were both widely used and associated with an increased risk of new-onset HF hospitalization in patients with T2DM. This suggests a previously unknown and serious, clinically relevant concern of NSAID use in patients with T2DM. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Ib Mogens Kristiansens Almene FondHelsefonden

Trigger Finger Release (Cadaver)

Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath, also known as trigger finger, occurs when there is a size mismatch between the flexor tendon and the surrounding retinacular pulley system at the first annular (A1) pulley. The A1 pulley overlies the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint at the base of the finger. When the flexor tendon thickens or becomes inflamed, its ability to properly glide through the flexor tendon sheath becomes impaired. Thus, the tendon catches as the finger is flexed and extended. Trigger finger is a frequently encountered condition for most hand surgeons, and it often coexists with other disorders such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, amyloidosis, and carpal tunnel syndrome.1–3 The cause is often idiopathic, though it has been speculated to result from overuse or repetitive movements of the finger.1,4 Conservative management includes activity modification, splinting, short-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroid injection, and other adjuvant therapies. This video demonstrates a surgical approach to the treatment of trigger finger via the open A1 pulley release procedure.

Laboratory safety evaluation of bedinvetmab, a canine anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, in dogs

Nerve growth factor (NGF), a critical mediator of nociception, is a novel analgesic therapeutic target. Bedinvetmab, a canine monoclonal antibody (mAb), binds NGF and inhibits its interaction with tropomyosin receptor kinase A (trkA) and p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) receptors. The objective of three integrated laboratory studies was to demonstrate the safety of bedinvetmab in adult laboratory Beagle dogs. Daily health, veterinary, clinical pathology, systemic exposure, and anti-drug antibody evaluations were performed. Study 1 additionally included electrocardiography, neurologic, and ophthalmic assessments, and radiographic monitoring of joints of the appendicular skeleton. Study 2 evaluated T-lymphocyte-dependent immune function. Study 3 evaluated the safety of short-term concurrent administration of carprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), with bedinvetmab. Studies 1 and 3 included terminal pathology and histopathology evaluations. Study designs and procedures included directed complementary morphologic and functional evaluations of a literature- and in vitro-based list of potential safety issues related to the NGF signaling pathway and characteristics engineered into this mAb. Screening-level general procedures evaluated effects associated with mAbs that target and inhibit soluble agonist cytokines.There were no treatment-related adverse changes in clinical evaluations, clinical neurological and ophthalmic examinations, joints, immune morphology or function, and no effects of short-term concurrent NSAID usage. Treatment-emergent immunogenicity was not observed. Bedinvetmab (1 mg/kg SC monthly; 3× and 10× dose multiples) was well tolerated in normal laboratory Beagle dogs for 6 months and with 2 weeks’ concurrent NSAID administration.

POS-036 TOPICAL NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS AND ACUTE ADVERSE RENAL EVENTS IN OLDER ADULTS

Prolonged systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) were associated with adverse renal outcomes among older adults. However, there is little data regarding the renal safety of topical and short-course systemic NSAID. We aimed to evaluate the risk of acute adverse renal outcomes among older adults prescribed topical and short-term systemic NSAID.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated acute kidney injury: does short-term NSAID use pose a risk in hospitalized patients?

While renal risk associated with short-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) has been anecdotally documented, no conclusive evidence is available on the renal safety, especially among hospitalized patients with reduced renal function. This study is to evaluate the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with NSAID use in hospital. A retrospective matched cohort study utilizing electronic health records from two large academic tertiary-care hospitals was conducted. We defined AKI based on changes in SCr according to published AKI criteria. The hospital acquired AKI risk associated with inpatient NSAID use was assessed using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression in pooled cohort as well as two sub cohorts stratified by baseline renal function. A total of 18,794 admissions were included in the final cohort. Of 9397 admissions exposed to NSAIDs, 7914 and 1483 admissions were in the "without" and "with baseline renal impairment" cohort, with the same number of matching non-exposed admissions in each of the stratified cohort. The AKI incidences were 6 and 22 events per 1000 patient-days in "without" and "with preexisting renal impairment" cohort, respectively. The adjusted analyses suggested that NSAID use increased AKI risk in patients with preexisting renal impairment (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38 [1.04-1.83]) but not in the patients without preexisting renal impairment (HR: 0.83 [95% CIs: 0.63-1.08]) or in the pooled cohort (HR: 1.01 [95% CIs: 0.83-1.24]). Our findings suggested that NSAID use is associated with an increased risk of AKI in the hospitalized patients with preexisting renal impairment but the association is not statistically significant in those who have preserved renal function. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these observational findings.

No Additive Clinical or Physiological Effects of Short-term Anti-inflammatory Treatment to Physical Rehabilitation in the Early Phase of Human Achilles Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy, but whether they have any additive clinical effect on physical rehabilitation in the early phase of tendinopathy remains unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: To investigate whether an initial short-term NSAID treatment added to a physical rehabilitation program in the early phase of Achilles tendinopathy would have an additive effect. We hypothesized that the combination of NSAID and rehabilitation would be superior to rehabilitation alone. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 69 patients with early phase Achilles tendinopathy (lasting <3 months) were randomly assigned to either a naproxen group (7 days of treatment; 500 mg twice daily; n = 34) or a placebo group (7 days of placebo treatment; n = 35). Both groups received an identical 12-week physical rehabilitation program. The clinical outcome of the study was evaluated using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment–Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire and a numerical rating scale (NRS), and the physiological outcome was evaluated using ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultra-short time to echo T2* mapping MRI (UTE T2* MRI). Follow-up was performed at 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year. Time effects are presented as mean difference ± SEM. Results: No significant differences were found between the 2 treatment groups for any of the outcome measures at any time point (P > .05). For the VISA-A score, a significant time effect was observed between baseline and 3-month follow-up (14.9 ± 2.3; P < .0001), and at 1-year follow-up, additional improvements were observed (6.1 ± 2.3; P < .01). Furthermore, the change in VISA-A score between baseline and 3-month follow-up was greater in patients with very short symptom duration (<1 month) at baseline compared with patients who had longer symptom duration (>2 months) (interaction between groups, 11.7 ± 4.2; P < .01). Despite clinical improvements, total weekly physical activity remained lower compared with preinjury levels at 3 months (–2.7 ± 0.5 h/wk; P < .0001) and 1 year (–3.0 ± 0.5 h/wk; P < .0001). At baseline, ultrasonography showed increased thickness (0.12 ± 0.03 cm; P < .0001) and vascularity (0.3 ± 0.1 cm2; P < .005) on the tendinopathic side compared with the contralateral side, but no changes over time were observed for ultrasonography, MRI, or UTE T2* MRI results. Conclusion: Clinical symptoms in early tendinopathy improved with physical rehabilitation, but this improvement was not augmented with the addition of NSAID treatment. Furthermore, this clinical recovery occurred in the absence of any measurable structural alterations. Finally, clinical improvements after a physical rehabilitation program were greater in patients with very short symptom duration compared with patients who had longer symptom duration. Registration: NCT03401177 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier) and BFH-2016-019 (Danish Data Protection Agency)

Short-Course Systemic and Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: Impact on Adverse Renal Events in Older Adults with Co-Morbid Disease.

Prolonged systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with adverse renal outcomes among older adults. However, there is scant data regarding the renal safety of topical and short-course systemic NSAIDs. We aimed to evaluate the risk of acute adverse renal outcomes among older adults prescribed topical and short-term systemic NSAIDs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all older adults, age 60 years and above, who received prescriptions between July 2015 and December 2017 from the largest tertiary hospital and a major public primary care institution in Singapore. Data from 6 months before until 30 days after the first prescription were retrieved from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute kidney injury (serum creatinine increased >26.5 µmol/L or >50% from baseline) and/or hyperkalemia within 30 days. A multi-variate analysis taking into account age, sex, co-morbidities, baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum potassium, NSAID route of administration, and concurrent renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker and diuretic prescription was performed to evaluate factors associated with the primary outcome. We identified 12,773 older adults with incident prescriptions: 3982 (31.2%) received short-course systemic NSAIDs, 3784 (29.6%) received topical NSAIDs, and 5007 (39.2%) did not receive any NSAID. Both short-course systemic NSAIDs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.80, p < 0.001) and topical NSAIDs (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.31-1.67, p < 0.001), compared with the no-NSAID group, were independently associated with the primary outcome. Among older adults with co-morbid conditions and prescribed NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs had a reduced odds of 30-day incident acute kidney injury and/or hyperkalemia in diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-1.06, p = 0.007), chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.90, p = 0.003), and cardiovascular disease (adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.79, p < 0.001), compared with short-course systemic NSAIDs. NSAIDs increased the risk of acute adverse renal events. Topical NSAIDs, compared with short-course systemic NSAIDs, were associated with a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury and/or hyperkalemia among older adults with additional risk factors.

Are NSAIDs Safe? Assessing the Risk-Benefit Profile of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use in Postoperative Pain Management.

In this article, we review controversies in assessing the risk of serious adverse effects caused by administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Our focus is upon NSAIDs used in short courses for the management of acute postoperative pain. In our review of the literature, we found that the risks of short-term NSAID use may be overemphasized. Specifically, that the likelihood of renal dysfunction, bleeding, nonunion of bone, gastric complications, and finally, cardiac dysfunction do not appear to be significantly increased when NSAIDs are used appropriately after surgery. The importance of this finding is that in light of the opioid epidemic, it is crucial to be aware of alternative analgesic options that are safe for postoperative pain control.

Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use upon male gonadal function: A national, population-based study.

Recent data have suggested that short-term NSAID use induces a state of compensated hypogonadism. Our aim was to investigate the association between chronic, regular NSAID use and compensated hypogonadism in a large, nationally representative cohort, the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Men 20-80years who answered the analgesic use questionnaire and underwent hormonal testing were included. Multivariable regression was utilised to determine the relationship between NSAID use and serum testosterone (T), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and T:AMH ratio. Among 3,749 men, 505 (13.5%) reported regular NSAID use and 3,244 (86.5%) did not. Regular users had lower T (440.7±27.0 vs. 557.0±24.9ng/dl, p=.005) and albumin (43.8±0.2 vs. 45.1±0.1, p<.001) compared to nonregular users. On multivariable analysis, only active smoking was significantly associated with T, AMH and T:AMH ratio (p<.001, p=.036 and p=.005 respectively). Regular NSAID use was not associated with T, AMH or T:AMH ratio (p=.523, p=.974, and p=.872 respectively). In this nationally representative sample of US men, regular and chronic NSAID use was not associated with alterations in T or compensated hypogonadism. These data should reassure patients and clinicians regarding the safety of NSAID use with respect to the risk of alteration in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Their Effect on Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Healing: A Scoping Review.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are being increasingly employed as a part of multimodal non-opioid strategies to treat postoperative pain. In the present study, we sought to review the effects of short-term NSAID use on musculoskeletal soft-tissue healing. We performed a scoping review of all studies that included the use of NSAIDs and their effect on healing of soft tissues, which for the purpose of this review refers to non-osseous musculoskeletal tissue such as ligament, tendon, labrum, and meniscus. The inclusion criteria encompassed all studies (human, animal, and in vitro) that evaluated the effect of NSAIDs on soft-tissue healing. Subgroup analyses, wherever applicable, were conducted on the basis of the type of NSAID (cyclooxygenase [COX]-specific or nonspecific) and the type of study (human, animal, or in vitro). Relevant metadata from each study were abstracted, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. A total of 44 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 3 human studies, 33 animal studies, and 8 in vitro studies. These studies included 4 different NSAIDs in the human subgroup, 16 different NSAIDs in the animal subgroup, and 7 different NSAIDs in the in vitro subgroup. The majority of reported studies (including 1 of 2 human studies, 10 of 14 animal studies, and 3 of 3 in vitro studies) demonstrated that COX-2-selective inhibitors had negative impact on soft-tissue healing. In contrast, the majority of human and animal studies (2 of 2 and 19 of 30, respectively) demonstrated that nonselective COX inhibitors had no negative effect on the healing of labrum, tendons, and ligaments. The majority of in vitro studies demonstrated that NSAIDs have a harmful effect on biological processes involved in tendon-healing and regeneration (tenocyte proliferation, collagen and glycosaminoglycan synthesis). Current limited evidence demonstrates that selective COX-2 inhibitors can negatively affect healing of musculoskeletal soft tissue after surgical repair. In contrast, the majority of studies demonstrate that nonselective COX inhibitors have no negative effect on musculoskeletal soft-tissue healing. Additional high-quality human clinical trials are necessary to provide more definitive conclusions.

Changing pattern of perforated PUD: Are NSAIDs to be blamed?

This study aimed to determine if there is association between gastric perforation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) abuse in patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD). The data were collected retrospectively from May 2011 to May 2015 and then prospectively until December 2017. Sixty patients diagnosed with PPUD on exploratory laparotomy were evaluated. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 21.0). P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 60 patients were operated on for PPUD during the study period. Forty-five (75.0%) patients gave significant history of NSAIDs use, of which nine (20.0%) had medical prescription, while others were over the counter medications. None of the patients was on ulcer prophylaxis including those who were on long term use and with prior dyspeptic symptoms. Five patients (11.1%) were on the recommended dose of the NSAIDs, thus patients in this series showed irrational use of NSAIDs. Forty-two (93.3%) patients had gastric perforation, while only three of the patients had duodenal perforation. The association between significant NSAIDs use and gastric perforation was found to be significant (p= 0.002). There was no difference in the site of perforation when patients who were on long term NSAIDs were compared with short term NSAIDs use (10.0 vs. 35.0) (p= 0.061). In addition, long term NSAIDs use (p= 0.041), ignorance of proper dose of the medication (p= 0.003), and gastric ulcer perforations (p= 0.011) were independent causes of mortality in the studied patients when age and duration of the presentations were matched. NSAIDs use, including both long- and short-term use, was significant among patients with gastric perforation.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: types of drug use and patient profiles in real clinical practice

Background: The best available evidence regarding non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding comes from randomized controlled trials including patients who use NSAIDs to manage chronic rheumatic diseases; however, patients with varying background profiles commonly take NSAIDs for many other reasons, often without prescription, and such usage has not been well studied.Objectives and methods: To define the characteristics of patients hospitalized for upper GI bleeding in clinical practice, we conducted a case–control study among patients with endoscopy-proven major upper GI bleeding due to gastroduodenal peptic lesions and control subjects. We used adjusted logistic regression models to estimate bleeding risks. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0.Results: Our analysis included 3785 cases and 6540 controls, including 1270 cases (33.55%) and 834 controls (12.75%) reporting recent use (<30 days) of NSAIDs including high-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). NSAID use was associated with increased risk of upper GI bleeding, with an adjusted relative risk of 4.86 (95% CI, 4.32–5.46). Acute musculoskeletal pain (36.1%), chronic osteoarthritis (13.5%), and headache (13.6%) were the most common reasons for NSAID use. Among cases, only 17.31% took NSAIDs and 6.38% took high dose ASA due to chronic osteoarthritis. Demographic characteristics significantly differed between subjects with chronic vs. acute musculoskeletal pain. Proton pump inhibitor use was significantly higher in patients who used NSAIDs due to chronic osteoarthritis compared to patients with acute musculoskeletal pain. NSAID (65.15%) or high-dose ASA use (65.83%) preceding upper GI bleeding was most often short-term. In over half of cases (63.62%), the upper GI bleeding event was not preceded by dyspeptic warning symptoms.Conclusions: The majority of patients hospitalized due to NSAID-related upper GI bleeding reported short-term NSAID use for reasons other than chronic rheumatic disease. These findings suggest that current prevention strategies may not reach a wide population of short-term NSAID users.

Cardiovascular safety of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin–diclofenac in the management of acute postsurgical pain: a pooled analysis of 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator–controlled phase III clinical trials

Study ObjectiveLong-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors, has been suggested to be associated with cardiovascular (CV) safety risks. Data are limited regarding CV risks associated with short-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, including injectable formulations, although it has been suggested that even a single dose may increase CV adverse event (AE) risk. The objective of this study was to examine the CV safety of an injectable diclofenac formulation solubilized with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) when given for ≤5days postoperatively. DesignA pooled analysis of CV AEs from 2 pivotal phase III clinical trials examining the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) HPβCD-diclofenac vs placebo and the active comparator ketorolac was conducted. SettingPostoperative, with treatment initiated in the postanesthesia care unit ≤6hours postsurgery. PatientsOverall, 608 abdominal/pelvic and orthopedic surgery patients met inclusion criteria and received ≥1 study medication dose. InterventionsPatients received either HPβCD-diclofenac, ketorolac, or placebo via IV bolus injection every 6hours, for ≤5days postsurgery. MeasurementsCV AEs, reported by study investigators, were evaluated through the treatment period and follow-up (≤37days after last study medication dose), and relative CV AE risks were estimated. Main ResultsIV HPβCD-diclofenac was not associated with increased treatment-emergent CV AE incidence vs placebo (11.6% vs 12.2%; relative risk, 0.96 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.62]). Serious CV AEs as well as treatment-related AEs were uncommon, and there were no reports of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident. CV AEs were uncommon during the follow-up period, occurring in 1.3%, 0%, and 1.4% of patients in the HPβCD-diclofenac, ketorolac, and placebo groups, respectively. ConclusionsAlthough a longer duration follow-up study in a larger patient population would expand our understanding of potential CV risks, the present analysis suggests that postoperative use of HPβCD-diclofenac does not present an added CV safety risk over placebo.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain.

Chronic back pain is an important health problem. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to treat people with low back pain, especially people with acute back pain. Short term NSAID use is also recommended for pain relief in people with chronic back pain. Two types of NSAIDs are available and used to treat back pain: non-selective NSAIDs and selective COX-2 NSAIDs. In 2008, a Cochrane review identified a small but significant effect from NSAIDs compared to placebo in people with chronic back pain. This is an update of the Cochrane review published in 2008 and focuses on people with chronic low back pain. To determine if NSAIDs are more efficacious than various comparison treatments for non-specific chronic low back pain and if so, which type of NSAID is most efficacious. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and two clinical trials registry databases up to 24 June 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English, German or Dutch. We also screened references cited in relevant reviews. We included RCTs (double-blind and single-blind) of NSAIDs used to treat people with chronic low back pain. Two review authors independently screened trials for inclusion in this Cochrane review according to the inclusion criteria. One review author extracted the data, and a second review author checked the data. Two review authors independently evaluated the risk of bias of all included trials. If data were clinically homogeneous, we performed a meta-analysis and assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. We included 13 trials in this Cochrane review. Ten studies were at 'low' risk of bias. Six studies compared NSAIDs with placebo, and included 1354 participants in total. There is low quality evidence that NSAIDs are more effective than placebo, with a mean difference in pain intensity score from baseline of -3.30 (95% CI -5.33 to -1.27) on a 0 to 100 visual analogue scale (VAS) with a median follow-up of 56 days (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 91 days). Four studies measured disability using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. There is low quality evidence that NSAIDs are more effective than placebo on disability, with a mean difference from baseline of -0.85 (95% CI -1.30 to -0.40) on a scale from 0 to 24 with a median follow-up of 84 days (IQR 42 to 105 days). All six placebo controlled studies also reported adverse events, and suggested that adverse events are not statistically significant more frequent in participants using NSAIDs compared to placebo (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.17). Due to the relatively small sample size and relatively short follow-up in most included trials, it is likely that the proportion of patients experiencing an adverse event is underestimated.Two studies compared different types of non-selective NSAIDs, namely ibuprofen versus diclofenac and piroxicam versus indomethacin. The trials did not find any differences between these NSAID types, but both trials had small sample sizes. One trial reported no differences in pain intensity between treatment groups that used selective or non-selective NSAIDs. One other trial compared diflunisal with paracetamol and showed no difference in improvement from baseline on pain intensity score. One trial showed a better global improvement in favour of celecoxib versus tramadol.One included trial compared NSAIDs with 'home-based exercise'. Disability improved more in participants who did exercises versus participants receiving NSAIDs, but pain scores were similar. Six of the 13 included RCTs showed that NSAIDs are more effective than placebo regarding pain intensity. NSAIDs are slightly more effective than placebo regarding disability. However, the magnitude of the effects is small, and the level of evidence was low. When we only included RCTs at low risk of bias, differences in effect between NSAIDs and placebo were reduced. We identified no difference in efficacy between different NSAID types, including selective versus non-selective NSAIDs. Due to inclusion of RCTs only, the relatively small sample sizes and relatively short follow-up in most included trials, we cannot make firm statements about the occurrence of adverse events or whether NSAIDs are safe for long-term use.

NSAID Pretreatment Inhibits Prostaglandin Release in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.

To investigate whether short-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) pretreatment on the day of surgery inhibits prostaglandin release. Previous studies detected elevated prostaglandin levels after femtosecond laser treatment and identified them as a potential mediator for laser-induced miosis. Patients underwent either image-guided femtosecond laser cataract surgery or conventional cataract surgery (n = 75). Half of the eyes per group received topical NSAID treatment on the day of surgery. Aqueous humor was collected from all patients. ELISA measurements were performed to detect aqueous humor prostaglandin levels. Femtosecond laser cataract surgery led to higher prostaglandin levels than conventional cataract surgery (P = .007). In both groups, NSAID pretreatment led to reduced prostaglandin release. In the femtosecond laser group, patients pretreated with NSAIDs had significantly lower prostaglandin values (65.3 ± 13.2 pg/mL) than patients not pretreated with NSAIDs (294.4 ± 66.5 pg/mL) (P = .0009). The short-term NSAID treatment prevented prostaglandin release in patients treated with image-guided femtosecond laser. Therefore, it has potential to limit intraoperative laser-induced miosis.

Increased Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Requiring Chronic Dialysis is Associated With Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs): Nationwide Case-Crossover Study.

It is known that many medical adverse events can be caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); however, epidemiologic evidence has not granted an affirmative relationship between NSAID use and the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We aimed to investigate the relationship in a Chinese population between short-term NSAID use and development of ESRD requiring chronic dialysis. A retrospective case-crossover design was used in this study. Using the Taiwanese National Health Insurance database, we identified 109,400 incident chronic ESRD patients with dialysis initiation from 1998 to 2009. For each patient, we defined the case period as 1 to 14 days and the control period as 105 to 118 days, respectively, before the first dialysis date. The washout period was 90 days between the case and control period. Detailed information about NSAID use was compared between the case and control periods. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a conditional logistic regression model. NSAID use was found to be a significant risk factor associated with dialysis commencement. The adjusted OR was 2.73 (95% CI: 2.62-2.84) for nonselective NSAIDs and 2.17 (95% CI: 1.83-2.57) for celecoxib. The OR reached 3.05 for the use of acetic acid derivatives. Compared with the oral forms, significantly higher risks were seen in parenteral NSAID use (OR: 8.66, 95% CI: 6.12-20.19). NSAIDs should be prescribed with caution, especially for those in ESRD high-risk groups.

Gastrointestinal injury associated with NSAID use: a case study and review of risk factors and preventative strategies.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents and are among the most commonly used classes of medications worldwide. However, their use has been associated with potentially serious dose-dependent gastrointestinal (GI) complications such as upper GI bleeding. GI complications resulting from NSAID use are among the most common drug side effects in the United States, due to the widespread use of NSAIDs. The risk of upper GI complications can occur even with short-term NSAID use, and the rate of events is linear over time with continued use. Although gastroprotective therapies are available, they are underused, and patient and physician awareness and recognition of some of the factors influencing the development of NSAID-related upper GI complications are limited. Herein, we present a case report of a patient experiencing a gastric ulcer following NSAID use and examine some of the risk factors and potential strategies for prevention of upper GI mucosal injuries and associated bleeding following NSAID use. These risk factors include advanced age, previous history of GI injury, and concurrent use of medications such as anticoagulants, aspirin, corticosteroids, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Strategies for prevention of GI injuries include anti-secretory agents, gastroprotective agents, alternative NSAID formulations, and nonpharmacologic therapies. Greater awareness of the risk factors and potential therapies for GI complications resulting from NSAID use could help improve outcomes for patients requiring NSAID treatment.

Relation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to serious bleeding and thromboembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving antithrombotic therapy: a nationwide cohort study.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are assumed to increase bleeding risk, but their actual relation to serious bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are receiving antithrombotic medication is unknown. To investigate the risk for serious bleeding and thromboembolism associated with ongoing NSAID and antithrombotic therapy. Observational cohort study. Nationwide registries. Danish patients with AF hospitalized between 1997 and 2011. Absolute risk for serious bleeding and thromboembolism with ongoing NSAID and antithrombotic therapy, assessed by using Cox models. Of 150900 patients with AF (median age, 75 years [interquartile range, 65 to 83 years]; 47% female), 53732 (35.6%) were prescribed an NSAID during a median follow-up of 6.2 years (interquartile range, 2.1 to 14.0 years). There were 17187 (11.4%) and 19561 (13.0%) occurrences of serious bleeding and thromboembolism, respectively. At 3 months, the absolute risk for serious bleeding within 14 days of NSAID exposure was 3.5 events per 1000 patients compared with 1.5 events per 1000 patients without NSAID exposure. The risk difference was 1.9 events per 1000 patients. In patients selected for oral anticoagulant therapy, the absolute risk difference was 2.5 events per 1000 patients. Use of NSAIDs was associated with increased absolute risks for serious bleeding and thromboembolism across all antithrombotic regimens and NSAID types. An NSAID dosage above the recommended minimum was associated with a substantially increased hazard ratio for bleeding. Observational design and unmeasured confounders. Use of NSAIDs was associated with an independent risk for serious bleeding and thromboembolism in patients with AF. Short-term NSAID exposure was associated with increased bleeding risk. Physicians should exercise caution with NSAIDs in patients with AF. None.

CT enteroclysis/enterography findings in drug-induced small-bowel damage.

To evaluate the CT enteroclysis (CTE)/enterography findings of patients with small-bowel mucosal damage induced by aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to compare these findings with the duration of drug use and endoscopic findings. CTE findings of 11 patients (22 lesions) with drug-induced small-bowel damage were reviewed, including 8 NSAID users and 3 aspirin users. Three patients were short-term users (6 months or shorter) and eight were long-term users (3 years or longer). Nine patients also underwent videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) or double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). Small-bowel abnormalities were visible in 8 of 11 patients (73%) on CTE. Multiple lesions were seen in five patients, including all short-term users. Lesions were classified into three types. Type 1 (mucosal patchy enhancement) was found in four of eight patients (50%, 12 lesions) all were short-term users. Small erosions with mild oedema/redness were shown by DBE. Type 2 (homogeneous hyperenhancement) was found in two of eight patients (25%, four lesions) who were long-term users. Large ulcers with marked oedema/redness were shown by DBE. Type 3 (stratification enhancement) was found in four of eight patients (50%, six lesions), both short-term and long-term users. Annular or large ulcers with strictures were shown by VCE or DBE. On CTE, Type 1 lesions in patients with mostly short-term aspirin or NSAID use, Type 2 lesions in patients with long-term use and Type 3 lesions in both types of patients were detected. CTE may have usefulness for the detection of mild damage. Small-bowel abnormalities owing to aspirin or NSAID present with three different patterns on CTE.