There is little argument the nation's transportation systems resemble a labyrinthian jungle. The problem is overwhelming. It involves systems developed independently of each other and are seemingly unable to accommodate new technology without major upheavals in cost and service. Supplanting old systems with new ones appears to be equally difficult, involving long lead times and conflicts between and national factions. One of the greatest transportation needs is for an effective short-distance (up to 500 miles) travel service. Although the transportation system has proven an ideal mode for longdistance travel, it has been costly, cumbersome and ineffective in meeting the daily needs of the millions of short-distant travelers. For this, says the Civil Aeronautics Board, after a two-year study of the present situation in the populated Northeast corridor, a properly implemented Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL) system is needed. Ten billion short-haul passenger miles were flown in the nation during 1970 alone. We estimate, says Dr. George Low, Acting Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, that the market for short-haul transportation will approach 40 billion passenger miles by 1980 and may well be between 100 billion and 300 billion passenger miles by 1995. In addition, increasing demands large airports be built away from heavily populated areas necessitate an efficient city-to-airport service. Pressures from the public to do something about door-to-door travel time are another factor. The market seems wide open. In light of this, one might ask why private industry has not capitalized on the need. The reasons are legion. They include both operating problems such as traffic control systems and the aircraft development In recent Congressional testimony, Roy P. Jackson, Associate Administrator for Advanced Research and Technology at NASA, explained the lack of STOL progress as the result of a of inaction. Providing the aircraft itselfone can take off and land in a small area, quietly, economically, and in all kinds of weather-is one element. The nature of the service, however, requires many small, convenient airports. Aircraft manufacturers are reluctant to assume the risk of developing the special type of transport needed for short-haul use without carrier orders and some assurance of Government certifications, says Jackson. And air carriers are reluctant to place orders for aircraft without some assurance of routes, suitable airports and a suitable traffic control system. And finally, local communities are reluctant to provide new airports or allow the use of existing ones because of the anticipated noise and pollution or because the advantages of the service are not apparent, he concludes. This particular cycle is relatively new. The increasingly divergent paths of military and civilian aircraft needs in recent years have left the aviation industry with much of the research and development work used to be a spin-off from military aircraft development. It is this void has led some Congressmen to urge NASA expand its aeronautical research into more direct applications. Thus NASA iS proposing in its 1972 budget requests $15 million for initial steps in a joint Government-industry program for research and development of a STOL system (SN: 11/28/70, p. 413). The system development is a joint NASA-Department of Transportation venture with NASA assuming the responsibility for the aircraft development. The DOT'S over-all responsibility is to organize an system can accommodate such a craft. According to Congressional testimony, much of the necessary wind tunnel testing, quiet engine, pollution and noise abatement research has already been done at NASA research centers as a natural function of the agency's charter. The new program, however, proposes to go one step further: NASA will go to industry with the requirements for the vehicle and award the contracts for building of two research craft. When NASA announces the opportunity for contract competition, says one NASA official, there will be open the opportunity for cost-sharing by the contract industry itself. If the aerospace industry is not willing to assume some of the cost, NASA will pay for it