Shorter Stent Length Research Articles

AneuGuide™ software-assisted vs. manual measurements in sizing for pipeline embolization device: An agreement study

Sizing of flow diverters (FDs) is a challenging task in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms due to their foreshortening behavior. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference between the sizing results from the AneuGuide™ software and from conventional 2D measurement. Ninety-eight consecutive patients undergoing pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment between October 2018 and April 2023 in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China) were retrospectively analyzed. For all cases, the optimal PED dimensions were both manually determined through 2D measurements on pre-treatment 3D-DSA and computed by AneuGuide™ software. The inter-rater reliability between the two sets of sizing results for each methodology was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The degree of agreement between manual sizing and software sizing were analyzed with the Bland-Altman plot and Pearson's test. Differences between two methodologies were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. There was better inter-rater reliability between AneuGuide™ measurements both for diameter (ICC 0.92, 95%CI 0.88–0.95) and length (ICC 0.93, 95%CI 0.89–0.96). Bland-Altman plots showed a good agreement for diameter selection between two methodologies. However, the median length proposed by software group was significantly shorter (16 mm versus 20 mm, p < 0.001). No difference was found for median diameter (4.25 mm versus 4.25 mm). We demonstrated that the AneuGuide™ software provides highly reliable results of PED sizing compared with manual measurement, with a shorter stent length. AneuGuide™ may aid neurointerventionalists in selecting optimal dimensions for FD treatment.

Pre‐stenting angiography‐FFR based physiological map provides virtual intervention and predicts physiological and clinical outcomes

Angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) (angio-FFR) has been validated against FFR and could provide virtual pullback. However, whether a physiological map can be generated by angio-FFR and its clinical value remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of physiological map created from angio-FFR pullback and its value in predicting physiological and clinical outcomes after stenting. An angio-FFR physiological map was generated by overlaying the virtual pullback onto coronary angiogram, to calculate physiological stenosis severity, length, and intensity (Δangio-FFR/mm). This map in combination with virtual stenting was used to predict the best-case post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) angio-FFR (angio-FFRpredicted ) according to the stented segments, and this was compared with the actual achieved post-PCI angio-FFR (angio-FFRachieved ). Additionally, prognostic value of predicted angio-FFR was investigated. Three hundred twenty-nine vessels with paired analyzable pre- and post-PCI angio-FFR were included. Physiological map was created successfully in all vessels. After successful PCI, angio-FFRpredicted and angio-FFRachieved were significantly correlated (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) with small difference (mean difference: -0.010 ± 0.035). In the virtual PCI only covering the segment with high angio-FFR intensity, the same physiological outcome can be achieved with shorter stent length (14.1 ± 8.9vs. 34.5 ± 15.8 mm, p < 0.001). Suboptimal angio-FFRpredicted was associated with increased risk of 2-year vessel-oriented composite endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-9.17). Angio-FFR pullback could provide a physiological map of the interrogated coronary vessels by integrating angio-FFR pullback and angiography. Before a PCI, the physiological map can predict the physiological and clinical outcomes after stenting.

Stratification Analysis of Statin Effect on Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients on Hemodialysis.

The statin use in patients on hemodialysis remains controversial, and no beneficial effects of statin on the reduction of adverse cardiovascular events have been reported in these patients. This study used stratification analysis to examine the clinical factors in patients on hemodialysis who could benefit from statin for secondary prevention. This prospective multicenter study included 234 consecutive patients on hemodialysis with coronary artery disease who underwent successful reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention. The patients were followed up for up to 3 years or until the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; defined as a composite of all-cause death and nonfatal myocardial infarction). Inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment was used to remove the selection bias. During the median follow-up period of 30 months, MACEs occurred in 55 patients. Patients with MACEs had significantly lower statin therapy (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the patients on statins had a significantly reduced rate of MACE occurrence [adjusted hazard ratio 0.30 (0.11-0.81), P = 0.02]. The stratification analysis of outcomes according to the presence of clinical factors showed that beneficial effects of statin were associated with man, elderly, lower body mass index, lower abdominal circumference, hypertension, diabetes, higher C-reactive protein, symptomatic heart failure, lower left ventricular function, nonacute coronary syndrome, and shorter stent length. Statin was effective for the prevention of MACEs in patients on hemodialysis who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. We identified specific clinical factors affecting statin effectiveness for secondary prevention.

S2326 Grasping for Straws: A Rare and Challenging Complication of Biliary Stenting

INTRODUCTION: Proximal (cephalad) migration of a biliary stent (PMBS) may be associated with severe complications. Prompt recognition and retrieval is important, but may be quite difficult. We present a challenging case of proximal migration of a plastic CBD stent, highlighting techniques used for successful retrieval. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 73-year-old F with an indeterminate proximal CBD and common hepatic duct (CHD) stricture undergoing biliary endotherapy presented for a scheduled ERCP. Due to inadequate drainage via retrograde approach, a percutaneous biliary drain (PBD) was placed 9 months ago and patient had undergone multiple biliary drain exchanges and one liver biopsy. Surgical resection was not pursued due to underlying comorbidities. Two weeks prior to presentation, ERCP for internalization of PBD revealed that a previously placed 7Fr x 12cm straight plastic stent had migrated proximally within the anterior RHD (Figure 1). Attempts to retrieve the migrated stent with balloon and snare were unsuccessful, so a 10Fr x 10cm stent was placed and PBD was pulled. On repeat ERCP, direct visualization with Spyglass cholangioscopy revealed the stent to be embedded within the bile duct sidewall at the stricture level (Figure 2). Multiple tools, including balloon catheter, snare and pediatric biopsy forceps failed to remove the stent. Even the cholangioscope biopsy forceps could not grasp stent sufficiently to enable traction and removal. After multiple failed attempts, the stent was successfully retrieved using a small rat tooth forceps via direct grasping of its distal end within the CHD under fluoroscopy. Repeat cholangiogram showed stable findings and no perforation and a 10Fr x 12cm straight plastic stent was replaced. DISCUSSION: PMBS is rare and endoscopic retrieval can be challenging. Risk factors of PMBS include malignant stricture, large stent diameter and shorter stent length. Retrieval of PMBS is critical to avoid complications such as hepatic/ductal perforation and fistula. Endoscopic retrieval methods include Soehendra retriever, basket, lasso technique, balloon and forceps. Cholangioscopy can also be used but was not helpful in this case. Fluoroscopic positioning of rat tooth forceps enabled stent retrieval in our case. We postulate that multiple biliary drain exchanges may have caused proximal migration of the biliary stent. Knowledge of the various tools and techniques to retrieve proximally migrated biliary stents is essential to successfully manage these technically challenging cases.Figure 1.: Fluoroscopic visualization of proximally migrated straight biliary stent appearing as an upside down “V”.Figure 2.: Direct visualization of the embedded distal end of the proximally migrated straight biliary stent using Spyglass cholangioscopy.

Identification of risk factors for obstructive cholecystitis following placement of biliary stent in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a 5-year retrospective analysis in single center.

The risk factors for acute cholecystitis following biliary stent placement in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) have not been identified. We determined these risk factors and the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) as treatment. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for MBO from October 2013 to September 2018, and those with unresectable MBO with intact gallbladder (GB) were enrolled. Acute cholecystitis occurred in 30 (15.7%) of 191 patients who underwent biliary stent placement for unresectable MBO. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that biliary stent across the orifice of the cystic duct (OCD) (odds ratio [OR] 6.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-25.41, P = 0.015), GB opacification during ERCP (OR 13.07, 95% CI 4.22-40.50; P < 0.0001), and self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) (OR 14.19, 95% CI 4.36-46.18; P < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for cholecystitis. Subgroup analysis of patients who only underwent SEMS placement showed that biliary stent across the OCD and GB opacification were significant risk factors. Among the 25 patients who underwent EUS-GBD, the technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 96%, respectively. Biliary stent across the OCD, GB opacification, and SEMS were established as potential risk factors for post-ERCP cholecystitis. Thus, the strategy of using shorter stent length and avoiding unnecessary contrast injection could be a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with high risk of cholecystitis. Furthermore, EUS-GBD is not only safe and reliable for acute cholecystitis, but it also improves quality of life.

Determinants of insufficient improvement in fractional flow reserve following percutaneous coronary intervention

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an increasingly important index for decision making concerning coronary revascularization. It is commonly accepted that significant improvement in FFR following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with better symptomatic relief and a lower event rate. However, in lesions with insufficient FFR improvement, PCI may not improve prognosis. Leading to the observation that the clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with insufficient FFR improvement have not been fully explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors associated with insufficient improvement in FFR. Using our own PCI database, established between January 2014 and December 2018, we identified 220 stable coronary artery lesions, which had been evaluated for both pre- and post-PCI FFR values. All 220 of these lesions were included in this study. The improvement in FFR (ΔFFR) was calculated in each lesion with the lowest quartile of ΔFFR being defined as the lowest ΔFFR group, and the other quartiles being defined as the intermediate-high ΔFFR group. The mean ΔFFR in the lowest and intermediate-high ΔFFR groups was 0.07 ± 0.02 and 0.21 ± 0.11, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a short total stent length (10mm increase: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96, P = 0.030), higher pre-PCI FFR (0.1 increase: OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.83-9.06, P = 0.001), in-stent restenosis (ISR) (OR 8.02, 95% CI 1.26-51.09, P = 0.028), myocardial infarction (MI) in the target vessel (OR 6.87, 95% CI 1.19-39.69, P = 0.031) and non-use of intravascular imaging (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.99, P = 0.048) were significantly associated with the lowest ΔFFR group. The use of short stents, higher pre-PCI FFR values, ISR, MI in the target vessel, and non-use of intravascular imaging were significantly associated with insufficient FFR improvement. It was conversely suggested that full coverage and adequate dilatation of the lesions under an intravascular imaging guidance might contribute to an improvement in FFR.

Long-term outcomes of a long, partially covered metal stent for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (with video)

We previously reported safety and effectiveness of EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) using a long, partially covered metal stent (LP-CMS) for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). In this study, we aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of EUS-HGS in an expanded cohort. One hundred ten patients undergoing EUS-HGS using an LP-CMS in 2 centers were retrospectively studied. Technical and functional success, adverse events, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and reinterventions were evaluated. The cause of MBO was pancreatic cancer in 50%, and the location of MBO was distal in 68%. The stent length was 8 cm in 2%, 10 cm in 84%, and 12 cm in 15%, with a median intragastric stent length of 54mm. Technical and functional success rates were 100% and 94%, respectively. The adverse event rate was 25% (mild 15%, moderate 7%, severe 3%), but about one-half of adverse events were mild transient fever and abdominal pain. RBO developed in 33%, with a median cumulative time to RBO of 6.3 months. The major cause of RBO was hyperplasia at an uncovered portion. The presence of prior biliary drainage and short intragastric stent length were significantly associated with RBO. Reintervention for RBO was successfully achieved through the EUS-HGS route in 92%. The remaining reintervention procedures were 1 EUS-HGS and 2 percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage all in cases with hilar MBO. EUS-HGS using an LP-CMS for unresectable MBO was safe and effective. RBO was not uncommon, butreintervention through the EUS-HGS route was technically possible in most cases.

Virtual simulation with Sim&Size software for Pipeline Flex Embolization: evaluation of the technical and clinical impact

IntroductionDuring flow diversion, the choice of the length, diameter, and location of the deployed stent are critical for the success of the procedure. Sim&Size software, based on the three-dimensional rotational...

Outcomes of directional branches using self-expandable or balloon-expandable stent grafts during endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of directional branches using self-expandable stent grafts (SESGs) or balloon-expandable stent grafts (BESGs) during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. MethodsPatients treated by fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair were enrolled in a prospective study from 2014 to 2018. We included in the analysis patients who had target vessels incorporated by directional branches using either SESG (Fluency [Bard, Covington Ga] or Gore Viabahn [W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz]) or BESG (Gore VBX). Target artery instability (TAI) was defined by a composite of any stent stenosis, separation, or type IC or type IIIC endoleak requiring reintervention and stent occlusion, aneurysm rupture, or death due to target artery complication. End points included technical success, target artery patency, freedom from TAI, freedom from type IC or type IIIC endoleak, and freedom from target artery reintervention. ResultsThere were 126 patients (61% male; mean age, 73 ± 8 years) included in the study. A total of 335 renal-mesenteric arteries were targeted by directional branches using SESGs in 62 patients and 176 arteries or BESGs in 54 patients and 159 arteries. Patients in both groups had similar thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm classification and aneurysm and target artery diameter, but SESG patients had significantly (P < .05) shorter stent length (−7 mm) and larger stent diameter (+1 mm) and more often had adjunctive bare-metal stents (72% vs 15%). Technical success was achieved in 99% of patients, with one 30-day death (0.7%). Mean follow-up was significantly longer among patients treated by SESGs compared with BESGs (23 ± 12 months vs 8±8 months; P < .0001). TAI occurred in 27 directional branches (8%), including 11 type IC endoleaks (2 SESGs, 9 BESGs), 10 stenoses (3 SESGs, 7 BESGs), 4 occlusions (3 SESGs, 1 BESGs), 4 type IIIC endoleaks (2 SESGs, 2 BESGs), and 1 stent separation (SESG), resulting in 20 target artery reinterventions in 16 patients (5 SESGs and 11 BESGs). At 1 year, SESGs had higher primary patency (97% ± 2% vs 96% ± 2%; P = .004), freedom from TAI (96% ± 2% vs 88% ± 3%; P < .0001), freedom from type IC or type IIIC endoleaks (98% ± 1% vs 92% ± 3%; P = .0004), and freedom from target artery reinterventions (98% ± 1% vs 88% ± 4%; P < .0001) compared with BESGs. There was no difference in secondary patency for SESGs and BESGs (98% ± 1% vs 99% ± 1%; P = .75). Factors associated with TAI were large stent diameter (odds ratio, 0.6; P < .0001) and use of VBX stent graft (odds ratio, 6.5; P < .0001). ConclusionsDirectional branches were associated with high technical success and low rates of stent occlusion, independent of stent type. However, primary patency, freedom from TAI, and freedom from type IC or type IIIC endoleaks was lower for BESGs compared with SESGs.

Surgical Techniques and Long-Term Outcomes of Flexible Neuroendoscopic Aqueductoplasty and Stenting in Infants with Obstructive Hydrocephalus: A Single-Center Study

To technically review and explore long-term follow-up results of aqueductoplasty and stenting under flexible neuroendoscopy in infantile obstructive hydrocephalus. The clinical data, surgical techniques, and long-term effects in 14 infants with obstructive hydrocephalus treated by flexible neuroendoscopic aqueductoplasty and stenting between 2008 and 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The 14 infants had a mean age of 5.71 ± 3.10 months (range, 2-11 months) and a mean duration of follow-up of 62.64 ± 34.52 months (range, 9-121 months). Subdural effusion was observed in 4 infants (28.6%) after surgery. There were no deaths or serious complications related to intracranial stent placement. Three infants (21.4%) failed, 2 due to proximal aqueduct occlusion from a short stent length and 1 due to intraluminal ependymal adhesion obstruction. One case was abandoned when a second surgical adjustment stent was unsuccessful, and the other 2 cases went to shunt surgery. Aqueductoplasty with stenting is a feasible and safe surgical procedure for treating infants with midbrain aqueduct stenosis or occlusion. However, the optimal stent material and definitive outcomes after this procedure require additional long-term follow-up studies in large numbers of infants.

To Whom Thrombus Aspiration May Concern?

BACKGROUND:Thrombus aspiration for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may improve myocardial perfusion. However, these favourable results called into a question by data indicating not only a lack of efficacy but a risk of potentially deleterious complications.AIM:To assess the effect of thrombus aspiration during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) on procedural angiographic results, stent characteristics, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).METHODS:All consecutive STEMI patients candidate for PPCI and admitted to Critical Care Department, Cairo University hospitals, managed either by thrombectomy before primary PCI (if thrombus score ≥ 3) or conventional PPCI, Six hundred seven subjects were enrolled in the study divided into Group with thrombectomy before PPCI (107 subjects, 18%), and group with Conventional PCI (500 subjects, 82%). ST-segment resolution, peak CK-MB, TIMI score, thrombus score, and MBG were assessed; stent number, diameter, length and stented segment were reported and follow up MACCE was reported (in hospital and 1-year post-intervention).RESULTS:Mean values for peak CKMB were less in thrombectomy group (228 ± 174 I/U vs 269 ± 186 I/U, p = 0.04), ST segment resolution ≥ 70% occurred in {63 subjects (58.9%) vs 233 (46.6%), p = 0.001} in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively. TIMI score pre procedure was zero in (102 subjects (95%) vs 402 (80.4%), p = 0.001), while TIMI III post procedure was reported in (100 subjects (93.4%) vs 437 (87%), p = 0.06), MBG mean values were (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 2.0 ± 1, p = 0.001), thrombus score was higher in thrombectomy group (4.6 ± 0.4 vs 0.8 ± 1.7, p = 0.001) in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively. Direct stenting was { 34 patients (31%) vs 102 patients (20%), p = 0.05}, mean stent diameter (2.7 ± 1.3 mm vs 3.5 ± 1.3 mm, p = 0.3), mean stent length was (19.9 mm ± 10 versus 22.7 mm ± 8 in p 0.01). mean stent number was (1.0 ± 0.5 vs 1.2 ± 0.6, p = 0.001), mean stented segment was (22.5 ± 13.5 vs 28.5 ± 15.2 mm, p = 0.001) in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively. MACCE in hospital were reported in {9 subjects (8.4%) vs 70 (14%), p = 0.07)}. Follow up MACCE after 1 year reported in {6 subjects (5.6 %) vs 80 (16 %), p 0.= 4} in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively.CONCLUSION:Thrombus aspiration before primary PCI (in a selected group with thrombus score ≥ 3) improves myocardial perfusion, suggested by better ST-segment resolution, TIMI flow, less peak CKMB and MBG, associated with a higher rate of direct stenting, shorter stent length, stented segments and less number of stents. Although thrombus aspiration was done in more risky patients (higher thrombus score) MACCE (in hospital and 1 year follow up) showed no statistical difference.

Outcomes of Directional Branches Using Self-Expandable Versus Balloon-Expandable Stent Grafts During Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of directional branches using self-expandable stent grafts (SESGs) or balloon-expandable stent grafts (BESGs) during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Patients treated with fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair in a prospective study using directional branches were included in the study. Choice of bridging stent evolved from SESG to BESG (Gore VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) in February 2017. Target artery instability (TAI) was defined by stent occlusion, stenosis, separation, type IC or type IIIC endoleak, reintervention, rupture, or death due to target artery complication. End points included technical success; target artery patency; and freedom from TAI, type IC or type IIIC endoleak, and reintervention. There were 118 patients (60% male; mean age, 75 ± 7 years) with 296 renal-mesenteric arteries targeted by directional branches using SESGs in 69 patients/162 arteries or BESGs in 49 patients/134 arteries. Patients in both groups had similar aneurysm diameter, target artery diameter, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm extent, which was I to III in 90%. Patients treated by SESGs had significantly (P < .05) shorter stent length (−7 mm), larger stent diameter (+1 mm), and more adjunctive bare-metal stents (74% vs 10%). Technical success was achieved in all patients, with no 30-day mortality. Mean follow-up was significantly longer among patients treated by SESGs (19 ± 12 months vs 6 ± 5 months). TAI occurred in 19 directional branches (6%), including 2 stent occlusions (all SESGs), 5 stenoses (3 SESGs, 2 BESGs), 2 separations (all SESGs), 9 type IC endoleaks (2 SESGs, 7 BESGs), and 4 type IIIC endoleaks (3 SESGs, 1 BESG), resulting in 15 reinterventions. At 1 year, there was no difference in primary (97% ± 1% vs 98% ± 1%; P = .77) and secondary patency (99% ± 1% vs 100%; P = .38) for SESGs and BESGs, respectively. However, SESGs had higher freedom from TAI (96% ± 2% vs 90% ± 4%; P = .005), type IC and type IIIC endoleaks (98% ± 1% vs 91% ± 3%; P = .003), and reinterventions (96% ± 1% vs 92% ± 4%; P = .02) compared with BESGs (Table). Factors associated with TAI were renal artery target (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .03) and lack of adjunctive bare-metal stents (odds ratio, 0.2; P = .004). Directional branches were associated with high technical success and low rates of occlusion or stenosis, independent of stent type. However, freedom from TAI was lower for BESGs because of more target artery endoleaks.TableThe 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates ratesBESG (n = 49 patients/134 arteries)SESG (n = 69 patients/162 arteries)P valueAll target arteries (n = 296) Primary patency98 ± 197 ± 1.77 Secondary patency10099 ± 1.38 Freedom from TAI90 ± 496 ± 2.005 Freedom from target artery reintervention92 ± 496 ± 1.02Renal artery targets (n = 108) Primary patency96 ± 492 ± 3.76 Secondary patency10096 ± 3.37 Freedom from TAI80 ± 892 ± 4.003 Freedom from target artery reintervention83 ± 894 ± 3.01Celiac and superior mesenteric artery targets (n = 188) Primary patency99 ± 1100.26 Secondary patency100100NA Freedom from TAI96 ± 298 ± 1.38 Freedom from target artery reintervention97 ± 298 ± 1.69BESG, balloon-expandable stent graft; NA, not applicable; SESG, self-expandable stent graft; TAI, target artery instability.Values are presented as percentage ± standard error. Boldface entries indicate statistical significance. Open table in a new tab

Unplanned stents in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection: A 16-year single-center report.

Background Unplanned stents in thoracic endovascular aortic repair mean additional stents implantation beyond the preoperative planning to achieve operation success. This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and consequences of unplanned stents in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection and explore the reasons, risk factors and solutions for unplanned stents. Methods Retrospectively analysis consecutive patients diagnosed as type B aortic dissection with initial tear originating distal from the left subclavian artery and underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair from September 1998 to June 2014 in our center. Results Under the criteria, this study enrolled 322 patients, with 83 (25.8%) patients in unplanned group. The incidence rate of unplanned stents in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection in each year demonstrates as a bimodal curve. The curve showed that, 2003 and, 2004 was the first and highest peak and 2007 was the second peak. There was no difference in five-year survival rate between planned and unplanned patients (log-rank test, p = 0.994). The unplanned group had higher hospitalization expenses (142,699.08 ± 78,446.75 yuan vs. 175,238.58 ± 34,838.01 yuan; p = 0.019), longer operation time (104.50 ± 93.24 min vs. 179.08 ± 142.47 min; p < 0.001) and hospitalization time (17.07 ± 16.62 d vs. 24.00 ± 15.34 d; p = 0.001). The reasons for unplanned stents were type Ia endoleak (46 patients, 55.4%), bird beak (25 patients, 30.1%), and inappropriate shaping of stent (9 patients, 10.8%). Asymptomatic aortic dissection patients had higher incidence of unplanned stents. Short proximal neck length (2.66 ± 0.59 mm vs. 2.50 ± 0.51 mm; p = 0.016), short stent coverage length (154.62 ± 41.12 mm vs. 133.60 ± 44.33 mm; p = 0.002), and large distal stent oversize (75.44±10.77% vs. 82.68±15.80%; p <0.001) were risk factors for unplanned stents in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusion There are some special risk factors and reasons for unplanned stents in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection. Knowing these can we reduce the utilization of unplanned stents with appropriate methods.

Predictors of stent dysfunction after self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: tumor ingrowth in uncovered stents and migration of covered stents.

Endoscopic metallic stenting is widely accepted as a palliation therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, the predictors of stent dysfunction have not been clarified. We aimed to evaluate the predictors, especially tumor ingrowth in uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (U-SEMS) and migration of covered self-expandable metallic stents (C-SEMS), which are the main causes related to the stent characteristics. In this multicenter retrospective study, we compared patients with U-SEMS and C-SEMS in terms of clinical outcomes, and predictors of stent dysfunction. In total, 252 patients (126 with U-SEMS and 126 with C-SEMS) were enrolled. There were no significant differences in technical success, clinical success, GOO score, or time to stent dysfunction. Tumor ingrowth was significantly more frequent in U-SEMS (U-SEMS, 11.90% vs. C-SEMS, 0.79%; p = 0.002), and stent migration was significantly more frequent for C-SEMS (C-SEMS, 8.73% vs. U-SEMS, 0.79%; p = 0.005). Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.04), no presence of ascites (p = 0.02), and insufficient (<30%) stent expansion (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with tumor ingrowth in U-SEMS. Meanwhile, a shorter stent length (p = 0.05) and chemotherapy (p = 0.03) were predictors of C-SEMS migration. Both U-SEMS and C-SEMS are effective with comparable patencies. Tumor ingrowth and stent migration are the main causes of stent dysfunction for U-SEMS and C-SEMS, respectively. With regard to stent dysfunction, U-SEMS might be a good option for patients receiving chemotherapy, while C-SEMS with longer stents for patients in good condition. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000024059).

Gastroesophageal stenting for the management of post sleeve gastrectomy leak. A single institution experience.

ObjectivesTo retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of gastroesophageal stenting for post sleeve gastrectomy staple line leaks using removable self-expandable stents.MethodsBetween April 2012 and June 2015, 12 consecutive patients (6 males) with mean age of 34 years: (21-38 years) presented with staple line leak 1-8 weeks after the operation (mean 2.8 weeks). Patients underwent gastroesophageal stenting by interventional radiology. A total of 23 stents were deployed with mean length of 17.8 cm (7-24 cm) and mean diameter 25.6 mm (18-36 mm). Stent re-insertion was needed in 7 patients (9 procedure), while 6 patients required percutaneous collection drainage and 3 patients required endoscopic glue injection with clipping. Two stent removal procedures were carried out under endoscopic visualization after failed stent capture under fluoroscopy, while the remaining stents were successfully removed by interventional radiology.ResultsStent placement was technically successful in all patients. Stent migration occurred in 6 patients (50%). There is a tendency for stent migration with shorter stent length (R= -0.557, p=0.008). The mean duration of stenting was 60.5 days (14-137 days). All patients underwent stent removal and resumed oral intake with no recurrence of leak at a mean follow up time of 190 days (14-410 days). Complications included gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1), proximal esophageal stricture (n=1) and stent occlusion (n=1).ConclusionGastroesophageal stenting as a primary measure after diagnosis of early post sleeve gastrectomy leak appears to offer a safe and effective alternative option in obviating repeat surgical interventions. Minimally invasive interventions may still be required for the management of persistent leak.

Success and complications of an intra-ductal fully covered self-expanding metal stent (ID-FCSEMS) to treat anastomotic biliary strictures (AS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Anastomotic biliary strictures (AS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) belong to the most common biliary complications and cause the biggest morbidity burden after OLT. Metal stents for benign biliary strictures are gaining acceptance with many published series. Traditional metal stent designs seem to have poor durability in AS after OLT. Novel intra-ductal stents are showing promise in these strictures. As a result, we designed a special stent with an antimigration waist and a short stent length with a long removal string that rests in the duodenum for easy removal. This is a retrospective multi-centre Australian study of AS after OLT treated with a novel intra-ductal fully covered self-expanding metal stent. From August 2008 to October 2014, records from three liver transplant centres were reviewed. Totally 36 ID-FCSEMS were inserted in 31 cases to treat an AS after OLT. The mean age of the patients was 56years, and 61% were male. The mean time of AS presentation after OLT was 20.3months. Eight out of our 31 patients were previously treated using multiple plastic stenting over time without any success. Treatment with the ID-FCSEMS was performed with an average treatment time of 3.8months. Stricture resolution was achieved in 100%. All attempted stents removals were successful without any difficulty. Complications were reported in 6.5%. It was pleasing that only one case of stent migration (2.8%) was seen. Follow-up showed seven cases of AS recurrence (24.1%), and all were treated successfully with repeat ERCP and stenting (some metal, some plastic). This novel ID-FCSEMS has a high clinical success and low complication rate, and in particular, there was only one case of stent migration. As a result, this stent type is preferred to traditional metal stents for treating AS after OLT.

Clinical outcomes of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified coronary lesions.

There is paucity of data regarding the clinical outcome of second generation drug- eluting stents (DES) post rotational atherectomy (RA) for heavily calcified coronary lesions (HCCL). The study cohort comprised 99 (116 lesions) consecutive patients who underwent RA for HCCL at our institution and received either a first generation DES (40 patients, 53 lesions) or a second generation DES (59 patients, 63 lesions). The analyzed clinical parameters were the 12-month rates of death (all cause and cardiac), Q-wave MI, target lesion revascularization (TLR), definite stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or TLR. The two groups were well matched for their baseline characteristics except for a lower left ventricular ejection fraction in the second generation DES group (46.0±23.0% vs. 55.0±9.0%; p=0.02). The group receiving second generation DES had more type C lesions (81.0% vs. 58.8%; p=0.01), shorter stent length (19.9±6.1 mm vs. 22.7±7.3 mm; p=0.04) and was more likely to undergo stent postdilatation (52.4% vs. 23.1%; p=0.001). The 1-year analyzed clinical parameters were similar in the two groups: all cause death (8.5% vs. 10.3%; p=1.0), cardiac death (8.5% vs. 2.5%; p=0.40), Q-wave MI (0% vs. 0%), TLR (3.6% vs. 2.7%; p=1.0), ST (0% vs. 0%), and MACE (11.9% vs. 12.8%; p=1.0). The 1-year MACE-free survival rate was also similar in the two cohorts. The use of second generation DES, following RA for HCCL, is associated with similar short and long-term clinical outcomes to first generation DES.

Comparison of Full Lesion Coverage versus Spot Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Coronary Artery Stenoses

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term clinical outcomes of the spot drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation strategy, which is used to minimize implanted stent length and the number of stents, versus full lesion coverage for treatment of coronary artery stenoses.Materials and MethodsWe evaluated 1-year clinical outcomes of 1619 patients with stent implantation for a single coronary lesion. They were divided into two groups: those treated by full lesion coverage (n=1200) and those treated with the spot stenting strategy (n=419). The combined occurrence of 1-year target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization was evaluated.ResultsThe spot DES implantation group had a shorter stent length (23.14±9.70 mm vs. 25.44±13.24 mm, respectively; p<0.001) and a fewer number of stents (1.09±0.30 vs. 1.16±0.41, respectively; p<0.001), even though the average lesion length was similar to the full lesion coverage group (21.36±10.30 mm vs. 20.58±10.97 mm, respectively; p=0.206). Spot DES implantation was superior to full DES coverage with respect to 1-year TVF (1.4% vs. 3.3%, p=0.044). Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that the risk for 1-year TVF was almost 60% lower among patients who received spot DESs compared to those who received full DES coverage after adjustment for other risk factors (HR=0.40, 95% confidence interval=0.17-0.98; p=0.046).ConclusionMinimizing stent length and the number of stents with overlapping by spot DES implantation may result in reduced rates of 1-year TVF, compared with full DES coverage.

A prospective multicentre registry, evaluating real-world usage of the Tryton side branch stent: results of the E-Tryton 150/Benelux registry

The percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains hampered by suboptimal results, mainly in the side branch (SB), even with the use of drug-eluting stents. Dedicated bifurcation stents could provide an attractive alternative to improve early outcomes and reduce SB restenosis. We aimed to assess in a prospective single-arm multicentre registry, safety and effectiveness at 6-month clinical follow-up of the Tryton dedicated side branch (SB) stent. In this prospective international registry, patients with coronary bifurcation lesions underwent treatment with a dedicated stenting technique using the Tryton stent, in conjunction with a "workhorse" main branch (MB) stent (drug-eluting or bare metal). The Tryton stent is specifically designed for bifurcations, with minimal strut/vessel ratio in the proximal MB, providing full strut coverage at the SB ostium, with short stent length in the SB and with the ability to adapt to the wide spectrum of bifurcation angles and sizes. The primary endpoint was 6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularisation). Secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success (respectively defined as successful implantation of Tryton at the intended lesion and successful performance of the whole procedure with Tryton without in-hospital MACE). A total of 302 patients were enrolled. Of these, 296 had 6-month data available for evaluation. Technical and procedural success occurred in 98.0% (95% confidence interval: 95.7%-99.1%) and 94.4% (91.2%-96.5%) patients, respectively. The cumulative 6-month MACE rate was 6.4% (4.2%-9.7%), including 4.7% (2.9%-7.7%) myocardial infarctions (3.7% periprocedural), and 3.4% (2.0%-6.1%) target lesion revascularisations (2.4% in the MB, 0.7% in the SB, and 0.3% in both MB and SB). One stent thrombosis (0.3% [0%-1.6%]) occurred. The treatment of bifurcation lesions with a dedicated Tryton stent is safe and feasible, with good technical and procedural success, very low revascularisation, MACE and stent thrombosis rates at 6-month clinical follow-up.

Food Impaction after Expandable Metal Stent Placement: Experience in 1,360 Patients with Esophageal and Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Obstruction

Purpose To retrospectively evaluate the incidence, predictive factors, and interventional management of food impaction after expandable metallic stent placement in patients with obstruction of the esophagus or upper gastrointestinal tract caused by benign or malignant disease. Materials and Methods Between March 1993 and March 2010, 1,360 patients (1,029 men, 331 women; age range, 21–89 y; mean age, 61 y) underwent fluoroscopically guided stent placement for dysphagia caused by esophageal or gastrointestinal tract strictures. Five types of covered expandable metal stents were used, including four types of esophageal stents (types A–D) and one type of gastroduodenal stent (type E), with types A, B, C, D, and E stents used in 180, 60, 90, 432, and 598 patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors predictive of food impaction. Results Food impaction occurred in 41 of 1,360 patients (3.0%). The food impaction rates for types A, B, C, D, and E stents were 0.6%, 1.7%, 1.1%, 3.2%, and 4.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that stent length was an independent predictor of food impaction (odds ratio, 0.839; P = .012). Of the 41 patients with food impaction, 23 underwent endoscopic management, 12 underwent fluoroscopically guided management, and six did not require management because impacted food spontaneously passed through the stent. Conclusions The overall food impaction rate was 3.0%, with multiple logistic regression analysis showing that shorter stent length was the only significant predictor of food impaction. Food impaction can be managed by endoscopic or fluoroscopically guided removal or placement of a second stent.