Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire Research Articles

What is the level of nutrition care provided to older adults attending emergency departments? A scoping review

BackgroundOlder adults often experience adverse health outcomes including malnutrition following discharge from emergency departments (ED). Discharge to community care is a transitionary time where nutritional vulnerability could be mitigated with the instigation of targeted nutrition care pathways in ED settings.Aims and objectivesThis scoping review aimed to establish and describe the level of nutrition care provided to older adults admitted and subsequently discharged from EDs.Research designSystematic searches of nine academic and grey literature databases (Medline (Ovid), Pubmed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus), grey literature sources (DART-Europe E-theses portal, Open Grey, and Trip Medical database) and four websites (Google, Google Scholar, NICE and LENUS) for relevant professional and organisational publications of research, policy, practice, and guidelines between January 2011 to 2023 were completed. Eligible studies included a population of older adults (≥ 65 years) with an ED attendance and subsequent community discharge, and where nutrition screening had identified malnutrition. Data were extracted on the level of nutrition and dietetic care initiated for older adults in the ED according to the Nutrition Care Process Model and summarised descriptively.ResultsOverall, 22 studies were included in the review. Nutrition status was screened on admission to the ED using validated tools: Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (n = 13), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (n = 2), Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (n = 2), NRS-2002 (n = 1) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment – Full Form (n = 1). A full nutrition assessment was reported by 5 studies. Only one study referred to documentation of malnutrition in healthcare records. Subsequent nutrition intervention after discharge from the ED for older adults was not described in any study.ConclusionWhile there is evidence to support malnutrition screening is taking place in EDs, there is a lack of information about subsequent nutrition care including assessment and therapy interventions. This points to the need for comprehensive exploration of nutrition care pathways, practice, policy, and research to inform models of integrated care for older persons.

Prediction of malnutrition using combined index of different nutritional parameters in elderly home care patients

<b>Aim: </b>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted to assess nutritional status in elderly home care patients using a combined index.<br /> <b>Methods: </b>The combined index was calculated as a reference tool based on the results of five nutritional parameters (Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form [MNA-SF], Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire [SNAQ], body mass index, dietary energy, and dietary protein). If a patient was assessed as malnourished or undernourished in at least three of these five parameters, he/she was considered as “any stage of malnutrition” according to the combined index.<br /> <b>Results: </b>The prevalence of malnutrition was 48.6%, 28.3%, and 47.4% according to the MNA-SF, SNAQ, and combined index, respectively. Dietary energy had the best sensitivity (92.7%) and negative predictive value (91.3%), while SNAQ had the highest specificity (100.0%) and positive predictive value (100.0%) according to the combined index. MNA-SF had the highest inter-rater agreement (kappa [κ]) with the combined index (κ =0.792).<br /> <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of combined index based on both screening tools and other nutritional parameters could be effective in the diagnosis of malnutrition in elderly home care patients.

Work and disability benefit unraveled in chronic gastrointestinal patients

Abstract Background Persons with a chronic disease, such as chronic gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary (GI-HPB) disease, have a lower work participation (WP) than the healthy population. Instead, they might receive a disability benefit (DB). Positive Health (PH) is a newly developed, holistic view of health and comprises six dimensions: bodily functions, mental well-being, meaningfulness, quality of life, participation, and daily functioning. In this study we aim to determine whether the dimensions of PH relate to WP and DB in persons with GI-HPB. Methods GI-HPB patients attending the outpatient clinic of the Maastricht University Medical Center between 2019-2021 received validated questionnaires (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Short Form-36, Disease Experience Questionnaire, EuroQol-5D-5L) and items regarding WP and DB. The relation between the six dimensions of PH, and WP and DB, were tested with univariate and multivariate statistics. Results 448 patients (Mage = 45 years; 69% female) were included. Univariate analysis revealed that, except for meaningfulness, all dimensions were significantly associated with WP (p≤.02) and DB (p≤.005). In multivariate analyses, lower age (p=.010), better general health (p=.044) and better physical functioning (p<.001) related to WP. Higher age (p=.002) and lower physical functioning (p=.011) related to DB. Conclusions Among GI-HPB patients, physical functioning related to both WP and DB. The chance of working was higher among younger patients and those with better general health while those with a higher age received DB more often. The PH concept was only partially relevant to work status and DB. Key messages • Within the dimensions of Positive health, work participation was associated with a lower age, a better general health and a better physical functioning. • Within the dimensions of Positive health, disability benefit was associated with higher age and lower physical functioning.

Measurability of overall health in patients with chronic gastrointestinal disorders

Abstract Background Chronic gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary (GI-HPB) patients experience problems in all life areas. The Positive health (PH) concept, based on six different dimensions of health, may hold the answers for a broader understanding of the patients’ well-being. Aim To measure the overall health status of GI-HPB patients, according to the PH concept. Methods In 2019-2021, patients with GI-HPB attending the outpatient clinic of the Maastricht University Medical Center filled in questionnaires before consultation. The six dimensions of PH (bodily functions, mental well-being, meaningfulness, quality of life, participation, daily functioning) were measured by validated questionnaires (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Short Form-36, Disease Experience Questionnaire, EuroQol-5D-5L). Results were compared to control groups and assessed with McDonald’s Omega, Zero-order Pearson correlations, and t-tests. Results The 235 participating patients scored lower on quality of life, participation, and daily functioning than healthy controls (p ≤ 0.001) but similar to those with other chronic conditions. Malnutrition (moderate-severe 45.6%) and depressive/anxious symptoms (35%/21.6%) were higher in the GI-HPB group compared to those with other chronic conditions. Conclusions Validated questionnaires addressing the six dimensions of PH showed a significant worse health status compared to controls, and malnutrition and depressive symptoms were higher compared to other patient groups. Key messages • GI-HPB patients have a lower quality of life, participate less, and have less daily functioning than healthy controls and higher malnutrition and depression than those with other chronic diseases. • By using validated questionnaires, an impression of the overall health status of patients can be obtained through the concept of Positive Health.

Characteristics of older adults receiving enteral feeding at a geriatric medical center

BackgroundMalnutrition is a prevalent and hard-to-treat condition in older adults. enteral feeding is common in acute and long-term care. Data regarding the prognosis of patients receiving enteral feeding in geriatric medical settings is lacking. Such data is important for decision-making and preliminary instructions for patients, caregivers, and physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and risk factors for mortality among older adults admitted to a geriatric medical center receiving or starting enteral nutrition (EN).MethodsA cohort retrospective study, conducted from 2019 to 2021. Patients admitted to our geriatric medical center who received EN were included. Data was collected from electronic medical records including demographic, clinical, and blood tests, duration of enteral feeding, Norton scale, and Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire score. Mortality was assessed during and after hospitalization. Data were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify the variables most significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.ResultsOf 9169 patients admitted, 124 (1.35%) received enteral feeding tubes. More than half of the patients (50.8%) had polypharmacy (over 8 medications), 62% suffered from more than 10 chronic illnesses and the majority of patients (122/124) had a Norton scale under 14. Most of the patients had a nasogastric tube (NGT) (95/124) and 29 had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs). Ninety patients (72%) died during the trial period with a median follow-up of 12.7 months (0.1–62.9 months) and one-year mortality was 16% (20/124). Associations to mortality were found for marital status, oxygen use, and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW). Age and poly-morbidity were not associated with mortality.ConclusionIn patients receiving EN at a geriatric medical center mortality was lower than in a general hospital. The prognosis remained grim with high mortality rates and low quality of life. This data should aid decision-making and promote preliminary instructions.

Analysis of the Occurrence and Influencing Factors of Oral Frailty in Elderly Residents of Elderly Care Facilities

To investigate the occurrence and influencing factors of oral frailty in elderly residents of elderly care facilities and to provide a basis for the development of effective intervention programs for oral frailty in this population. A combination of subjective and objective measurements of oral frailty, a general information questionnaire, a leisure activity questionnaire, the Dietary Variety Score (DVS), the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Short-Form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Barthel Index (BI), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), 15-Item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-2 (GAD-2) were used to survey 348 elderly residents in three elderly care facilities in Chengdu and to analyze the factors related to oral frailty. The prevalence of oral frailty in elderly residents of elderly care facilities was 31.0% (108/348). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (odds ratio [OR]=1.347, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.237-1.496, P<0.001), cognitive impairment (OR=6.769, 95% CI: 2.628-18.916, P<0.001), and depression (OR=8.632, 95% CI: 1.931-44.387, P=0.007) were risk factors for oral frailty in elderly residents of elderly care facilities. High scores in leisure activities (OR=0.883, 95% CI: 0.786-0.986, P=0.030), and dietary diversity (OR=0.199, 95% CI: 0.069-0.530, P=0.002) were protective factors against oral frailty. The prevalence of oral frailty is relatively high among elderly residents of elderly care facilities. Risk factors for oral frailty include advanced age, cognitive impairment, and depression, while increased levels of leisure activities and dietary diversity can help prevent the occurrence of oral frailty in elderly individuals.

The association between the ‘at risk of developing undernutrition’ category of the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire 65+ and incident undernutrition in community-dwelling older adults

Background & AimsScreening tools like the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire 65+ (SNAQ65+) have been developed for the early recognition of undernutrition in older adults. The SNAQ65+ screens for being undernourished (red), being ‘at risk of developing undernutrition’ (i.e. ‘at risk’, orange), or ‘not at risk’ (green). This study investigated whether community-dwelling older adults ‘at risk’ (orange) are more likely to develop undernutrition during a 3-year follow-up compared to those ‘not at risk’ (green). MethodsProspective data from a Longitudinal Aging Study were used. A total of 5461 observations, using multiple 3-year waves of participants aged ≥65 years with an orange or green baseline score were included. Logistic mixed models were used to assess the association with four indicators of incident undernutrition at 3-year follow-up: (1) red SNAQ65+ score (mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) <25 cm and/or ≥4 kg self-reported unintended weight loss in 6 months); (2) MUAC <25 cm; (3) ≥4 kg self-reported unintended weight loss in 6 months; and (4) ≥10% objectively measured weight loss in 3 years. ResultsThere were 53.1% female participants across waves, with a mean age of 74.2 (SD 6.1) years. Overall, 6.2% were ‘at risk of developing undernutrition’ (orange) at baseline. The incidence rates of undernutrition based on a red SNAQ65+ score, MUAC <25 cm, ≥4 kg self-reported unintended weight loss, and ≥10% measured weight loss were 10.4%, 2.9%, 6.4%, and 5.4%, respectively. Those ‘at risk’ (orange) had a higher odds ratio of incident undernutrition based on these four indicators than those ‘not at risk’ (green) (respective odds ratio's: 2.51 (95%CI 1.74-3.62); 2.16 (95%CI 1.11-4.20); 2.43 (95%CI 1.61-3.65); and 2.08 (95%CI 1.28-3.37)). ConclusionCommunity-dwelling older adults screened to be ‘at risk of developing undernutrition’ (orange) with the SNAQ65+ have a more than two-fold higher odds ratio of developing undernutrition during a 3-year follow-up compared to those ‘not at risk’ (green).

A taste alteration-related scale assesses megestrol to improve chemotherapy-induced anorexia.

We evaluated the efficacy of megestrol in improving chemotherapy-related anorexia by analyzing the related scales of taste alteration. We conducted the current study on a group of advanced patients with cancer with two or more chemotherapy cycles. The chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAs) scale helped assess the megestrol effects on basic taste perception, aversive taste changes, unpleasant symptoms, and associated concerns. Furthermore, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire scale (SNAQ) helped measure the impact of megestrol on malnutrition likelihood in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced anorexia. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Scale was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants, producing scores related to physical health, psychological well-being, environmental factors, and social relationships. The CiTAs scale assessment indicated that administering megestrol significantly enhanced taste perception among advanced patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Notably, the megestrol group patients showed significantly higher Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) scores than the control group. The megestrol group patients also exhibited higher physiological (PHYS) scores than their control group counterparts. However, this distinction was not statistically significant. The study findings indicate that patients who received megestrol demonstrated significantly higher scores in psychological (PSYCH) and environmental(ENVIR) domains than the control group. Furthermore, megestrol administration was associated with significantly elevated SOCIL and ENVIR levels in patients. The proficient efficacy evaluation of megestrol in enhancing appetite, mitigating malnutrition likelihood, and improving the quality of life of chemotherapy-induced anorexic patients can be achieved through taste-related scales.

Nutrient Intakes and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Among Esophagogastric Cancer Survivors up to 5 Years Post-Surgery

A cross-sectional analysis explored nutritional intakes and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms among esophagogastric cancer survivors up to 12, 13–36, and 37+ months post-surgery. Participants were identified from the Upper GI Cancer Registry at St James’ Hospital, Ireland. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, European Prospective Investigation of Cancer Food Frequency Questionnaire, World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Score, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale assessed malnutrition risk, nutritional intake, adherence to (secondary) cancer prevention recommendations, and GI symptoms, respectively. Most (82.5%, n33) participants (n40) were male. Mean age was 65.5 ± 9.3 years. Time post-surgery ranged from 6-62 months. Half (50.0%, n20) had a BMI in the healthy range. A quarter (27.5%, n11) were at risk of malnutrition. Intakes of meat and meat products exceeded recommendations and intakes of fruits, vegetables, and fiber were below recommendations, with no significant between-group differences. The mean WCRF/AICR score was 3.6 ± 1.1, indicating adherence to 3.6 of 7 cancer prevention recommendations. It was not significantly different between subgroups. Minor to mild GI discomfort was reported, with no significant between-group differences in symptoms. As rates of long-term survivorship continue to increase, survivors must be supported to sustain behaviors that enhance quality of life and reduce secondary cancer risk.

Malnutrition Screening Tools Are Not Sensitive Enough to Identify Older Hospital Patients with Malnutrition.

This study evaluates the concurrent validity of five malnutrition screening tools to identify older hospitalized patients against the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) diagnostic criteria as limited evidence is available. The screening tools Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment-Short Form (PG-SGA-SF) with cut-offs for both malnutrition (conservative) and moderate malnutrition or risk of malnutrition (liberal) were used. The concurrent validity was determined by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the level of agreement by Cohen's kappa. In total, 356 patients were included in the analyses (median age 70 y (IQR 63-77); 54% male). The prevalence of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria without prior screening was 42%. The conservative cut-offs showed a low-to-moderate sensitivity (32-68%) and moderate-to-high specificity (61-98%). The PPV and NPV ranged from 59 to 94% and 67-86%, respectively. The Cohen's kappa showed poor agreement (k = 0.21-0.59). The liberal cut-offs displayed a moderate-to-high sensitivity (66-89%) and a low-to-high specificity (46-95%). The agreement was fair to good (k = 0.33-0.75). The currently used screening tools vary in their capacity to identify hospitalized older patients with malnutrition. The screening process in the GLIM framework requires further consideration.

Multi-Domain Screening: Identification of Patient's Risk Profile Prior to Head-and-Neck Cancer Treatment.

Head-and-neck cancer (HNC) can give rise to oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty. Early identification of these phenomena in newly diagnosed HNC patients is important to reduce the risk of complications and to improve treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was (1) to determine the prevalence of the risk of OD, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty; and (2) to investigate the relation between these phenomena and patients' age, performance status, and cancer group staging. Patients (N = 128) underwent multi-domain screening consisting of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 for OD, Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and BMI for malnutrition, Short Physical Performance Battery and Hand Grip Strength for sarcopenia, and Distress Thermometer and Maastricht Frailty Screening Tool for frailty. 26.2%, 31.0%, 73.0%, and 46.4% of the patients were at risk for OD, malnutrition, sarcopenia, or frailty, respectively. Patients with an advanced cancer stage had a significantly higher risk of OD and high levels of distress prior to cancer treatment. This study identified the risk profile of newly diagnosed HNC patients using a standardized 'quick and easy' multi-domain screening prior to cancer treatment.

Prevalence of Undernutrition in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in The Netherlands: Application of the SNAQ65+ Screening Tool and GLIM Consensus Criteria.

The aim of this study was to provide recent data on the prevalence of undernutrition based on screening and diagnosis in Dutch community-dwelling older adults. The data from the 2021 to 2022 examination wave from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (n = 1138) and the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2019-2021 (n = 607) on community-dwelling men and women aged 65 years and older were used. The prevalence of undernutrition was based on a positive score on the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire 65+ (SNAQ65+) screening tool, a positive diagnosis using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and their combination. Of the combined sample (n = 1745), the mean age was 74 (SD 6) years, where 16.7% were aged 80 years or older, 50.5% was female, 56.9% had a high education level, and 30.3% lived alone. The prevalence of undernutrition based on the SNAQ65+ screening in the combined sample was 8.5% (95% CI 7.3-9.9%). In the subgroup of LASA participants with complete data on all GLIM criteria (n = 700), the prevalence of undernutrition was 5.4% based on SNAQ65+ and 7.1% based on GLIM. A positive SNAQ65+ screening followed by a positive GLIM diagnosis resulted in a lower prevalence (3.1%). Being female, older, living alone, receiving formal home care, and having poor self-rated health, poor appetite, or mobility limitations, they were all associated with a higher prevalence, with more than two-fold higher prevalence rates in some subgroups. The results show that currently one out of twelve community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older is undernourished based on the SNAQ65+ screening, and one out of fourteen is undernourished based on the GLIM diagnosis criteria. Awareness is needed to increase early recognition and treatment in community and primary care, especially among the more vulnerable groups.

Malnutrition is associated with six-month mortality in older patients admitted to the emergency department with hip fracture.

Hip fractures in older people are a common health problem often associated with malnutrition that might affect outcomes. Screening for malnutrition is not a routine examination in emergency departments (ED). This analysis of the EMAAge study, a prospective, multicenter cohort study, aimed to evaluate the nutritional status of older patients (≥ 50 years) with hip fracture, factors associated with malnutrition risk, and the association between malnutrition and the six-months mortality. Risk of malnutrition was evaluated using the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire. Clinical data as well as data on depression and physical activity were determined. Mortality was captured for the first six months after the event. To assess factors associated with malnutrition risk we used a binary logistic regression. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of malnutrition risk with six-month survival adjusted for other relevant risk factors. The sample consisted of N = 318 hip fracture patients aged 50 to 98 (68% women). The prevalence of malnutrition risk was 25.3% (n = 76) at the time of injury. There were no differences in triage categories or routine parameters measured in the ED that could point to malnutrition. 89% of the patients (n = 267) survived for six months. The mean survival time was longer in those without malnutrition risk (171.9 (167.1-176.9) days vs. 153.1 (140.0-166.2) days). The Kaplan Meier curves and the unadjusted Cox regression (Hazard Ratio (HR) 3.08 (1.61-5.91)) showed differences between patients with and patients without malnutrition risk. In the adjusted Cox regression model, risk of death was associated with malnutrition risk (HR 2.61, 1.34-5.06), older age (70-76 years: HR 2.5 (0.52-11.99); 77-82 years: HR 4.25 (1.15-15.62); 83-99 years: HR 3.82 (1.05-13.88)) and a high burden of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3: HR 5.4 (1.53-19.12)). Risk of malnutrition was associated with higher mortality after hip fracture. ED parameters did not differentiate between patients with nutritional deficiencies and those without. Therefore, it is particularly important to pay attention to malnutrition in EDs to detect patients at risk of adverse outcomes and to initiate early interventions.

Nutritional Screening and Physical Activity Status Assessment in Elderly: Comparison of Nutritional Screening Initiative (NSI), Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

Nutritional Screening and Physical Activity Status Assessment in Elderly: Comparison of Nutritional Screening Initiative (NSI), Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

Appetite loss and associated factors at 1 year after intensive care unit elder survivors in a secondary analysis of the SMAP-HoPe study

Appetite loss, a common but serious issue in older patients, is an independent risk factor for sarcopenia, which is associated with high mortality. However, few studies have explored the phenomenon of appetite loss after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, we aimed to describe the prevalence of appetite loss and relationship between appetite loss and depression in patients living at home 12 months after intensive care. This study involved secondary analysis of data obtained from a published ambidirectional study examining post-intensive care syndrome 12 months after discharge (SMAP-HoPe study) conducted in 12 ICUs in Japan. We included patients aged > 65 years. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale were used for the analysis. Descriptive statistics and a multilevel generalized linear model were used to clarify the relationship between appetite loss and depression. Data from 468 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of appetite loss was 25.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.5–29.4). High severity of depression was associated with a high probability of appetite loss (odds ratio, 1.2; 95%CI, 1.14–1.28; p = 0.00). Poor appetite is common 12 months after intensive care and is associated with the severity of depression.

The Performances of SNAQ, GLIM, mNICE, and ASPEN for Identification of Neurocritically Ill Patients at High Risk of Developing Refeeding Syndrome.

We previously found that neurocritically ill patients are prone to refeeding syndrome (RFS), a potentially life-threatening complication. However, there is no unified or validated consensus on the screening tool for RFS so far. We aimed to validate and compare the performance of four screening tools for RFS in neurocritically ill patients. We conducted a single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study among neurocritically ill adult patients who were admitted to the neurocritical care unit (NCU), and who received enteral nutrition for 72 h or longer. They were scored on the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), the modified criteria of the Britain’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (mNICE), and ASPEN Consensus Recommendations for Refeeding Syndrome (ASPEN) scales to predict RFS risk via admission data. The performance of each scale in predicting RFS was evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for RFS, and they were added to the above scales to strengthen the identification of RFS. Of the 478 patients included, 84 (17.57%) developed RFS. The sensitivity of the SNAQ and GLIM was only 20.2% (12.6–30.7%), although they had excellent specificities of 84.8% (80.8–88.1%) and 86.0% (82.1–89.2%), respectively; mNICE predicted RFS with a sensitivity of 48.8% (37.8–59.9%) and a specificity of 65.0% (60.0–69.9%); ASPEN had the highest Youden index, with a sensitivity and specificity of 53.6% (42.4–64.4%) and 64.7% (59.8–69.4%), respectively. The Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curves (AUC) of SNAQ, GLIM, mNICE, and ASPEN to predict RFS were 0.516 (0.470–0.561), 0.533 (0.487–0.579), 0.568 (0.522–0.613), and 0.597 (0.551–0.641), respectively. We identified age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score as independent risk factors of RFS, and the combination of GCS and age can improve the AUC of ASPEN to 0.664 (0.620–0.706) for predicting RFS. SNAQ, GLIM, mNICE, and ASPEN do not perform well in identifying neurocritically ill patients at high risk of RFS, although ASPEN appears to have relatively a good validity among them. Combining GCS and age with ASPEN slightly improves RFS recognition, but it still leaves a lot of room for improvement.

Malnutrition risk and oropharyngeal dysphagia in the chronic post-stroke phase.

BackgroundOropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) and malnutrition are associated with poor clinical outcomes after stroke. The present study evaluated (1) malnutrition risk and OD-related characteristics in patients with chronic post-stroke OD, and (2) the relationship between on the one hand OD severity and on the other hand functional oral intake and dysphagia-specific quality of life.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in a Dutch interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for OD. The standardized examination protocol comprised: clinical ear, nose, and throat examination, body mass index, the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ), a standardized fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), the functional oral intake scale (FOIS), and the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI).ResultsForty-two consecutive patients with chronic post-stroke OD were included. Mean (±SD) age and BMI of the population were 69.1 (±8.7) years and 26.8 (±4.1) kg/m2 respectively. Seventeen (40.4%) patients presented a moderate to high risk of malnutrition (SNAQ score≥2). The FEES examination showed moderate to severe OD in 28 (66.7%) patients. The severity of OD was significantly related to the FOIS score but not to the MDADI scores.ConclusionIn this specific sample of referred stroke patients, moderate to severe OD and moderate to high risk of malnutrition were common. Despite the use of clinical practice guidelines on stroke and a normal nutritional status at first sight, repeated screening for malnutrition and monitoring the severity and management of OD remain important elements in the care of patients with chronic post-stroke OD.

The predictors of postoperative delirium at surgical units in Sudan: A multicenter, cross-sectional, prospective study.

Knowledge of potential and amenable risk factors involved in the development of postoperative delirium (POD) is imperative for successful prevention and subsequent management. The current study objective was to delineate the risk factors associated with the occurrence of POD among patients undergoing surgical procedures. This multi-center (6 hospitals), cross-sectional prospective hospital-based study recruited 415 subjects aged ≥50 years who were scheduled to undergo different types of surgery. Delirium Observational Screening Scale used for the diagnosis of POD. Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire used for assessing the nutritional and the hydration status of patients. Pre and postoperative risk factors analyzed by univariate (chi square) and then multivariate analyses and the incidence rate of POD, was reported. The main outcome measure was the development of POD. Out of the 385, only 43 subjects (11.2%) developed POD. High American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR: 10.76, 95% CI: 1.379-83.99, P =0.023), duration of surgery (OR: 5.426, 95% CI: [2.249-13.092]; P =0.0001), were the strongest independent risk factors for the development of POD. Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living score (OR: 3.227, 95% CI: [1.177-8.844], P =0.023), and age ≥ 70 years (OR: 1.174, 95% CI: [1.015-1.359]; P =0.027) were additional strongest independent risk factors for the development of POD. Based on analysis or study, we found High American Society of Anesthesiologist sore, Katz-ADL, duration of surgery, and advanced age were predictors of POD. Our findings suggest preventive measures initiated in subjects identified at risk of developing POD. These results support the healthcare providers in the early prevention, diagnosis, and timely management of POD.

Exploring nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in Dutch district nursing care: A survey study.

There is a lack of evidence to guide district nurses in using nurse-sensitive patient outcomes as it is unclear how these outcomes are currently used in daily district nursing practice. Therefore, we aimed to explore (1) which nurse-sensitive patient outcomes are measured and how these outcomes are measured, (2) how district nurses use the outcomes to learn from and improve current practice and (3) the barriers and facilitators to using outcomes in current district nursing practice. An exploratory cross-sectional survey study was conducted. The survey was distributed online among nurses working for various district nursing care organisations across the Netherlands. The responses from 132 nurses were analysed, demonstrating that different instruments or questionnaires are available and used in district nursing care as outcome measures. The nurse-sensitive patient outcomes most often measured with validated instruments are pain using the Numeric Rating Scale or Visual Analogue Scale, delirium using the Delirium Observation Scale, weight loss using the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire and caregiver burden using the Caregiver Strain Index or a Dutch equivalent. Falls and client satisfaction with delivered care are most often measured using unvalidated outcome measures. The other nurse-sensitive outcomes are measured in different ways. Outcomes are measured, reported and fed back to the nursing team multiple times and in various ways to learn from and improve current practice. In general, nurses have a positive attitude towards using nurse-sensitive outcomes in practice, but there is a lack of facilitation to support them. Because insight into how nurses can and should be supported is still lacking, exploring their needs in further research is desirable. Additionally, due to the high variation in the utilisation of outcomes in current practice, it is recommended to create more uniformity by developing (inter)national guidelines on using nurse-sensitive patient outcomes in district nursing care.

Complementarity of nutritional screening tools to GLIM criteria on malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalised patients: A secondary analysis of a longitudinal study

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a two-step approach for the malnutrition diagnosis: screening to identify "at risk" patients by any validated nutritional screening tool (NST), followed by a detailed nutritional assessment for diagnosis and grading the severity of malnutrition. Since there are several validated NST, this study aimed to evaluate the complementarity of five NST to GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in a sample of hospitalized patients. A secondary analysis of a longitudinal study. Data collection occurred within 48h of hospital admission and included clinical, sociodemographic and nutritional data. We applied five tools for nutritional risk (NR) screening: Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk in Emergency-2017 (NRE-2017), Nutritional Risk Screening - 2002 (NRS-2002), and Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ). GLIM criteria were applied to malnutrition diagnosis considering all five criteria. Patients were followed up until discharge to assess hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality and contacted six months post-discharge to assess hospital readmission and death. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive and negative values (PPV and NPV), and kappa. We grouped patients according to NR and malnutrition status in four categories [i.e. NR(+)/GLIM(+)] and investigated their associations with the clinical outcomes in regression models adjusted to the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Among the 601 patients included (55.8±14.8 years, 51.4% males), 41.6% were malnourished by GLIM criteria. The frequency of NR ranged from 24.0% (NRE-2017) to 35.8% (NRS-2002). MUST had the highest sensitivity (73.6%), NPV (83.6%) and PPV (93.4%). All NST presented specificity higher than 90%, except NRS-2002. The accuracy of NST ranged from 76.3% (SNAQ) to 86.8% (MUST). NR (+)/GLIM (+) by NRE-2017, MST, and MUST increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (HR ranged from 5.34 to 10.10). NR (+)/GLIM (+) increased the odds of LOS ≥10 days (RR between 2.11 and 3.01), readmission (RR between 1.51 and 1.80), and mortality six months after discharge (RR between 3.91 and 5.12), regardless of the NST applied. MUST presented the highest metrics of accuracy in comparison to GLIM criteria and was an independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes when nutritional risk was combined to malnutrition diagnosis. So, risk screening by MUST is suggested as the first step of the GLIM approach.