Short Falls Efficacy Scale International Research Articles

Do Orthotics with a Metatarsal Pad Decrease Pain and Fear of Falling in Older Adults? A Randomized Control Trial

Aims This randomized control trial compares the effects of orthotics, with and without metatarsal pads, on pain and fear of falling in older adults (NCT04894396). Methods 206 participants over 60 years old received either an Aetrex L2305 Orthotic with metatarsal pads (intervention) or an Aetrex L2300 Orthotic without metatarsal pads (control). Outcome scores were collected at baseline and at six weeks. Results Both the intervention and control groups reported significant improvements in pain in the back, hips, knees, ankles, and feet, measured on a Numerical Rating Scale (p < 0.001). Foot pain and foot function subscales of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International also significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). Between-group differences were not statistically significant for any outcome (p > 0.05). Conclusions Orthotics, with and without metatarsal pads, decrease pain and fear of falling in older adults.

Pain neuroscience education, blended exercises and booster sessions as an effective therapy for pain, functional and psychological factors in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial with 22 factorial design during 6-month follow-up

IntroductionThis study aims to investigate whether a pain neuroscience education (PNE) combined with a blended exercises programme including aerobic, resistance, neuromuscular, breathing, stretching and balance exercises and diet education provides...

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of concerns-about-falling instruments in older people and people at increased risk of falls.

The 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) is widely used to assess concerns-about-falling. Variants include 7-item Short FES-I, 30-item Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon FES) and 10-item short Icon FES. No comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to synthesise evidence regarding the measurement properties of these tools. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of four FES-I variants. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched systematically and articles were assessed for eligibility independently. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist. The quality of measurement properties was assessed using COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties. Where possible, meta-analysis was conducted; otherwise, narrative synthesis was performed. Overall certainty of evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system approach. The review included 58 studies investigating measurement properties of the four instruments. There was high-quality evidence to support internal consistency, reliability and construct validity of all instruments. Moderate- to high-certainty evidence suggests one-factor structure of FES-I with two underlying dimensions, one-factor structure of Short FES-I and two-factor structure of Icon FES. There was high-certainty evidence to support the responsiveness of FES-I, with further research needed for the other instruments. There is evidence for excellent measurement properties of all four instruments. We recommend the use of these tools with healthy older people and people at a greater risk of falls due to conditions that might affect mobility and balance.

Validation of FES-I and Short FES-I Scales in the Polish Setting as the Research Tools of Choice to Identify the Fear of Falling in Older Adults.

Fear of falling is associated with a clear hazard to individual self-reliance, reduced physical activity, as well as a sense of shame and loss of self-confidence. The present study aimed to complete the applicable translation and validation protocol for the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) tool, following its prior adaptation to ensure full compatibility with the Polish setting. The FES-I questionnaire, along with its abridged version, was translated in line with the recommended standards of the MAPI Institute, taking into account both the cultural fabric and pertinent language specifics of the country. The survey was attended by 740 individuals (N = 740; 463 women, 277 men), over 60 years old. All respondents were required to complete both the FES-I and FES-I (Short) questionnaires twice, following an intervening period, and subsequently had their responses statistically assessed. The FES-I questionnaire, along with its abridged version, may be recommended as an effective assessment tool for addressing the fear of falling issue among the older adults, consequently allowing the teams of attending physicians, physiotherapists, psychologists, or psychiatrists to complete an unambiguous diagnosis, with a view to helping the patients overcome this particular type of anxiety.

Korean Version of the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I): Study of Validity and Reliability

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I).Methods: The Korean version of the short FES-I was developed through the FES-I translation protocol. Participants for the psychometric tests included 300 older adults (100 visiting a senior welfare center, 100 registered as frail elderly in a public health center, and 100 visiting an orthopedic department at a university hospital after hip-fracture surgery). The psychometric tests included content, construct, criterion validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.Results: One factor of the seven items was validated and explained by 79.4% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the model fit and convergent validity. Mean scores according to fall history were also significantly different. Correlation analysis confirmed criterion validity with a single item of fear of falling (r=.76, p&lt;.001). There were reliable internal consistencies with Cronbach’s α coefficients of .95 and, .93, and the ICC (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient) for test-retest reliability was .95.Conclusion: This scale showed excellent validity and reliability in Korea. It is useful to measure fear of falling for older adults in clinical or community settings.

Measurement properties of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) in persons with late effects of polio: A cross-sectional study.

Fear of falling (FoF) is very common in persons with late effects of polio (LEoP). An internationally recognized rating scale to assess FoF is the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Yet, there is limited knowledge about its measurement properties in persons with LEoP. To investigate the measurement properties of the FES-I (16-item version) and the short FES-I (7-item version) in persons with LEoP. Explorative factor analysis and Rasch model analysis of cross-sectional data. University hospital. A total of 321 persons with LEoP (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] 70 ± 10 years, 173 women). The FES-I and the short FES-I, comprising four response options about concerns of falling ranging from 1 (not at all concerned) to 4 (very concerned). Data were collected by a postal survey. First, a factor analysis was performed to investigate the unidimensionality of the scale. Thereafter, a Rasch model analysis was used to further analyze the measurement properties of the FES-I and the short FES-I, such as local dependency, targeting, hierarchical order of items, Differential Item Functioning (DIF), response category functioning and reliability (Person Separation Index, PSI). Raw score transformation to interval measurements was also performed. The factor analysis revealed that the FES-I was unidimensional, even though the Rasch analysis showed some misfit to the Rasch model and local dependency. Targeting for the FES-I and the short FES-I was somewhat suboptimal as the participants on average reported less FoF than expected. A negligible gender DIF was found for two items in the FES-I and for one item in the short FES-I. Reliability was high (PSI >0.86), and the response category thresholds worked as intended for both the FES-I and the short FES-I. The FES-I and the short FES-I have sufficient measurement properties in persons with LEoP. Both versions can be used to assess fear of falling (or FoF) in this population.

Factors influencing fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults in Singapore: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundFear of falling (FoF) has far-reaching implications including activity restriction, functional decline and reduced quality of life. It is a common consequence of falls but may be present even in non-fallers. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with FoF in a segment of Singapore’s community-dwelling older adults.MethodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study recruited a convenience sample of adults aged 65 and above from 4 primary care clinics from September 2020 to March 2021. Data were collected on demographic factors, clinical factors such as multi-morbidity, falls characteristics such as history of falls, injuries, and reasons for falls and frailty as determined by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). FoF was measured using the Short Falls Efficacy Scale–International (Short FES-I), cut-off score of 14 and above indicated high FoF. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with high FoF.ResultsOut of 360 older adults, 78.1% were Chinese and 59.7% females. The mean age was 78.3 years and 76 (21.1%) had a history of falls in the past six months. Almost half (43.1%) were mildly to moderately frail and most (80.6%) had multi-morbidity. The mean FoF score was 15.5 (SD 5.97) and 60.8% reported high FoF. There were statistically significant differences in age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, use of walking aid, multi-morbidity, frailty status, history of falls within six months and reason for falls between patients who had high FoF versus those who had moderate or low FoF. Logistic regression found that Malay ethnicity (OR = 5.81, 95% CI 1.77–19.13), marital status, use of walking aids (OR = 3.67, 95% CI = 1.54–8.77) and frailty were significant factors associated with high FoF. Compared to those who were never married, the odds of high FoF were significantly higher in married older adults (OR = 6.75, 95% CI 1.39 to 32.76), those who were separated or divorced (OR 10.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 95.76) and those who were widowed (OR = 7.41, 95% CI 1.51 to 36.41). Compared to well older adults, the odds of high FoF were significantly higher in pre frail older adults (OR = 6.87, 95% CI = 2.66–17.37), mildly frail older adults (OR = 18.58, 95% CI = 4.88–70.34) and moderately frail older adults (OR = 144.78, 95% CI = 13.86–1512.60).ConclusionsThe study found that pre frail to moderately frail older adults as determined by CFS have significantly higher risk of high FoF. The demographic factors such as marital status and ethnicity and falls characteristics associated with FoF in this study will be helpful to develop targeted and tailored interventions for FoF.

Assessing avoidance behavior due to concerns about falling: Psychometric properties of the FES-IAB in a sample of older adults of an online panel

Background and Objectives: The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) and its shorter version (Short FES-I) are widely used measures of concerns about falling (CaF) and have consistently demonstrated good psychometric properties. The FES-I Avoidance Behavior (FES-IAB) and Short FES-IAB were developed to gain insight into activity avoidance due to CaF and add a question to each item of the FES-I and Short FES-I. The objective was to assess the psychometric properties of the FES-IAB and Short FES-IAB in community-dwelling older people.Methods: A community-dwelling sample of the Dutch population (n = 744) aged 60 and over completed the FES-IAB twice with one month in between (with a follow-up response rate of 92.2%).Results: Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensionality of the FES-IAB, with high factor loadings and very good fit. The scale correlated strongly with the FES-I, and moderately with ADL disability and 1-item questions of activity avoidance and CaF. The FES-IAB discriminated well between groups based on age, sex, fall history. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high (Cronbach's alpha: 0.92, intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85). FES-IAB scores were positively skewed; 343 people (46.1%) had the lowest possible score of 16. The psychometric properties of the Short FES-IAB were comparable. No problems were identified with the feasibility of the FES-IAB and Short FES-IAB.Discussion: Overall, the FES-IAB and Short FES-IAB demonstrated good psychometric properties in assessing activity avoidance due to CaF in community-dwelling older people. These instruments may help researchers and clinicians to investigate the behavioral consequences of CaF.

Single-Session Evidence-Based Intervention and Fall Risk Awareness in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Purpose: To determine effects of a fall risk educational program on fall risk awareness. Methods: Twenty-five community-dwelling older adults 65 years and older attended a single-session intervention. Investigators held focus groups 1 month post-intervention. Investigators administered the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (S-FES-I) pre- and post-intervention. Results: Raw S-FES-I scores trended toward reduced fear of falling. Older adults reported heightened awareness of fall risks and reinforcement of fall prevention behaviors. Social support and narrative storytelling helped motivate participants. Conclusion: A single-session educational program reinforced existing fall risk reduction knowledge and behaviors but was limited in its ability to prompt behavioral change.

Mental and Physical Self-Awareness of Alzheimer Patients: Decreased Awareness of Amnesia and Increased Fear of Falling Compared to Views of Families: The Tajiri and Wakuya Projects

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to examine self-awareness of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) regarding forgetfulness and physical status, with the goal of further psychological understanding of these patients. Methods: The 255 subjects included 33 healthy volunteers and 48 patients with mild cognitive impairment who were elderly community residents selected from the 2017 Wakuya Project and 174 consecutive outpatients with AD at the Tajiri Clinic. Test data were selected from a pooled database. Results from the Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES), and Everyday Memory Checklist (EMC) were used in the study. FES and EMC data were also obtained from family members for comparison. Results: EMC scores in the AD groups (mild to moderate and moderate to severe) were significantly higher (more complaining memory impairment) than those in the CDR 0 (healthy) group and significantly lower (less self-awareness for memory impairment) than the corresponding EMC scores of families of the subjects. In contrast, FES scores of the AD groups did not differ significantly from those of the CDR 0 group, and these scores were higher (more fear of falling) than those of family members. Additionally, family-FES scores of the AD groups were higher than those of the CDR 0 and 0.5 groups. Conclusion: The results showed an evidence of the heterogeneity of awareness, an emotional response (concern or fear, FES), and a cognitive appraisal of function (EMC). These may be explained whereby awareness of/fear of falling increases with AD due to a preserved emotional awareness, whereas awareness of cognitive impairment is impaired due to memory deficits.

Prevalencia del miedo a caer y factores asociados en personas mayores que viven en la comunidad

AimTo know, in the population over 70, independent for walking, the prevalence of the concern to fall according to the short version of the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaire, in old people living in the community and their associated factors. DesignCross-sectional study. LocationCentro de Salud El Greco, Getafe, Madrid, Spain. Participants189 patients ≥70years with a Barthel ≥60, independent for walking (walk 45minutes without help or with a cane). The study was offered to a total of 328 people, of these accepted 217 and rejected 111. Main measurementsThe dependent variable, fear of falling (FOF), was evaluated by means of the short FES-I questionnaire, considering as a cut-off point for the positive screening of the MC a score ≥11. As independent variables we considered: Barthel index, Downton scale, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) fragility test, falls in the last year, injuries associated with falls, time since the last fall, sensory deficit, use of gait devices, comorbidity and pharmacological treatment. ResultsThe prevalence of FOF was 42.9% (95%CI: 35.5-50.2). The factors associated with FOF in the final multivariate analysis were: female sex, living alone, high risk of falls, presence of frailty (SPPB≤9), use of hypotensive drugs, and injuries associated with previous falls. ConclusionsThe prevalence of FOF in older people is high. Primary Care professionals should systematize the screening of this health problem, prioritizing especially in people who present the following risk factors: being a woman, living alone, having a low score on the SPPB (as an indicator of frailty) or presenting a high risk of falls.

The Role of Functional Risk and Fear of Falling in Older Adults’ Everyday Walking Activity

Some persons have low functional risk (FR) but also high levels of fear of falling (FOF), in some it may be the exact opposite; in others, FOF matches actual functional risk. In order to characterise older persons in this respect, Delbaere et al. (2010) defined four groups: ‘vigorous’ (low FR/FOF), ‘anxious’ (low FR/high FOF), ‘stoic’ (high FR/low FOF), and ‘aware’ (high FR/FOF). We examined how the proposed group model translates into actual walking behaviour and explored whether group differences in walking occur due to FR level rather than the amount of FOF. Group allocation of N=294 participants was determined based on previously published cut-offs for FR (high vs. low Timed Up-and-Go) and FOF (high vs. low Short Falls-Efficacy Scale International). Walking activity was operationalised as mean number of steps per day over one week, assessed using ‘activPAL4™ micro’ accelerometers. Number of steps in the four groups were 6,335 (‘vigorous’), 5,782 (‘anxious’), 4,851 (‘stoic’), and 4,627 (‘aware’). Linear regression results showed that in the two low FR groups, those with high FOF did not differ significantly from the reference group with low FOF (anxious - vigorous: B=-645.3 steps, p=.157); however, the two groups with high FR showed a significantly different number of steps than the ‘vigorous’ group, irrespective of their FOF (aware-vigorous: B=-1536.1 steps, p=.002; stoic-vigorous: B=-1314.8 steps, p=.005). This means that FR outperformed FOF in their association with walking behaviour, i.e., participants can be better separated in their daily walking behaviour by FR than by FOF.

Mediating factors on the association between fear of falling and health-related quality of life in community-dwelling German older people: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundPrevious research has shown that not only falls, but also fear of falling (FoF) influences health-related quality of life (HrQoL) negatively. The EQ-5D (consisting of an index and a visual analogue scale [EQ-VAS]) is a frequently used instrument to determine HrQoL in clinical studies and economic evaluations, but no previous study compared the association between FoF and the EQ-5D index with the association between FoF and the EQ-VAS. Moreover, factors that influence the association between FoF and HrQoL are rarely examined. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association between FoF and HrQoL and to examine factors that mediate the association.MethodsFoF (Short Falls Efficacy Scale International) and HrQoL (EQ-5D descriptive system, EQ-5D index, and EQ-VAS) were assessed in a sample of community-dwelling older persons (≥70 years) participating in the baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial (N = 309). Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for sociodemographic variables, frequency of falls, number of chronic conditions, functional mobility (Timed up-and-go test), and subjective functional capacity (LLFDI function and disability scales). Multiple regression models were used to test the mediating effects.ResultsModerate or high FoF was prevalent in 66% of the sample. After adjusting for covariates, FoF was negatively associated with the EQ-5D index, but not with the descriptive system or the EQ-VAS. Subjective functional capacity partly mediated the association between FoF and the EQ-5D index and completely mediated the association between FoF and the EQ-VAS.ConclusionFoF was negatively associated with the EQ-5D index. As subjective functional capacity mediated the association between FoF and HrQoL, future interventions should account for subjective functional capacity in their design.

Validation of Igbo version of the modified falls efficacy scale among community-dwelling older adults: a validation study

BackgroundFear of falling (FOF) is a very pervasive problem among older adults. Consequently, many scales have been developed for its assessment. The Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES) is one of the most popular FOF scales. The MFES was originally developed for use in developed countries, and thus may not be entirely suitable for use in developing countries due to cultural and environmental differences between the two country categories. This study was therefore designed to cross-culturally adapt and validate the MFES to Igbo culture and environment among community-dwelling older adults in Nnewi community using established guidelines.MethodsThe original English version of the MFES (E-MFES) was translated, synthesized, back-translated, subjected to expert panel review, and pretested before producing the final Igbo version of the MFES (I-MFES). The I-MFES and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International were randomly administered to consecutively recruited 109 consenting older adult residents of Nnewi (43.1% males; mean age = 74.45 ± 8.78 years). Convergent and structural validities and internal consistency of the I-MFES were assessed at 0.05 level of significance.ResultsAll the 14 items on the E-MFES were retained on the I-MFES. The I-MFES exhibited the same structure as the E-MFES. The correlation between the total scores on the I-MFES and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International was excellent (rho = − 0.93) indicating evidence of convergent validity of the I-MFES. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the I-MFES was 0.97 showing evidence of excellent internal consistency of the items on the I-MFES.ConclusionThis study provides evidence of some aspects of validity and reliability of the I-MFES.

Fall-related efficacy is associated with the progression of frailty in community-dwelling older people

The goal of this study was to verify the association between frailty and fall-related efficacy in community-dwelling older people by performing a cross-sectional and longitudinal data analysis. In this study, 339 people aged 65 years and older participated in a baseline survey. Furthermore, people who were not identified as frail in the baseline survey participated in a follow-up survey 6 months later. Frailty was assessed in the baseline and follow-up surveys after 6 months using the Kihon checklist. Fall-related efficacy was assessed at baseline using the short Falls Efficacy Scale International (short FES-I). Potential confounding factors, such as the lower limb functions and psychological functions, were also investigated at baseline. The association between frailty and short FES-I was analyzed using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for potential confounding factors. At baseline and the follow-up survey, 10.1% and 6.3% of the participants were judged to demonstrate frailty, respectively. The results of the baseline and follow-up data analysis showed that even if potential confounding factors were adjusted for, the short FES-I was significantly associated with frailty. Furthermore, the ability to distinguish the onset of frailty using the short FES-I was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under curve, sensitivity, and specificity values were 0.78, 0.92 and 0.56, respectively. A clear association between frailty and fall-related efficacy was thus observed, as indicated in the cross-sectional and longitudinal data analysis. Furthermore, based on the results of the longitudinal data analysis, the short FES-I was found to be able to predict the progression of frailty and it can thus be a useful screening tool for assessing frailty.

Fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults presenting to the emergency department for minor injuries: Impact on return to the ED and future falls.

1) To characterize mild, moderate, and severe fear of falling in older emergency department (ED) patients for minor injuries, and 2) to assess whether fear of falling could predict falls and returns to the ED within 6 months of the initial ED visit. This study was part of the Canadian Emergency and Trauma Initiative (CETI) prospective cohort (2011-2016). Patients ages ≥ 65, who were independent in their basic daily activities and who were discharged from the ED after consulting for a minor injury, were included. Fear of falling was measured by the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (SFES-I) in order to stratify fear of falling as mild (SFES-I = 7-8/28), moderate (SFES-I = 9-13/28), or severe (SFES-I = 14-28/28). Many other physical and psychological characteristics where collected. Research assistants conducted follow-up phone interviews at 3 and 6 months' post-ED visit, in which patients were asked to report returns to the ED. A total of 2,899 patients were enrolled and 2,009 had complete data at 6 months. Patients with moderate to severe fear of falling were more likely to be of ages ≥ 75, female, frailer with multiple comorbidities, and decreased mobility. Higher baseline fear of falling increased the risk of falling at 3 and 6 months (odds ratio [OR]-moderate-fear of falling: 1.63, p < 0.05, OR-severe-fear of falling 2.37, p < 0.05). Fear of falling positive predictive values for return to the ED or future falls were 7.7% to 17%. Although a high fear of falling is associated with increased risk of falling within 6 months of a minor injury in older patients, fear of falling considered alone was not shown to be a strong predictor of return to the ED and future falls.

Effect of normal limbs active exercise rehabilitation training in fear of falling and motor function in patients with cerebral infarction after intervention

Objective To investigate the effectiveness of normal limbs active exercise rehabilitation training in fear of falling and motor function in patients with cerebral infarction after intervention. Methods A total of 74 cerebral infarction after intervention patients were enrolled in Wanbei Coal-Electricity Group General hospital from May 2016 to April 2018. Patients were randomly divided into the observation group 37 patients and the control group 37 patients according to the random number table method. The control group received routine rehabilitation training, normal limbs active exercise rehabilitation was carried out in the observation group. After 3 months of intervention, the fear of falling, activities of daily living, limbs motor function was assessed by short Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer motor function scoring, respectively. Results Before intervention, the short FES-I score was (15.32±3.15) and (15.47±4.89) in the observation group and in the control group respectively, after intervention, the score was (10.21±2.67) and (12.28±4.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in short FES-I scores between the two groups pre-intervention (P> 0.05). However, the short FES-I scores were significantly decreased in the observation group compared to the control group at post-intervention (t value was 2.468, P 0.05). However, those scores were significantly increased in the observation group compared to the control group at post-intervention (t value was 2.562, 2.878, 4.553, P<0.05). Conclusion Normal limbs active exercise rehabilitation training can alleviate the fear of falling and promote motor function and self-care ability of patients with cerebral infarction after intervention. Key words: Cerebral infarction; Interventional therapy; Active exercise; Fear of falling; Motor function

Validation of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with deep brain stimulation.

The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FoG-Q) is a fast and sensitive assessment tool for freezing (FoG). The objective of the study is for validation of a Czech version of FoG-Q. A further, explorative aim was to examine what FoG-Q indicates about the presence and severity of gait impairment in patients treated with DBS in their full OFF state. The study was a cross-sectional validation study. We translated FoG-Q following standardized validation protocol. We assessed 35 patients with PD and STN DBS using history taking, UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr staging, Mini Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, FoG-Q, Short Falls Efficacy Scale International, and Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition. UPDRS III, clinical and instrumental gait assessment, was repeated OFF MED/DBS OFF and OFF MED/DBS ON. Internal consistency of FoG-Q was excellent (α = 0.91) as well as convergent (significant correlations with UPDRS II item 14, UPDRS III item 29, several TUG parameters, and FoG Score) and divergent validity (no association with UPDRS I). OFF MED/DBS OFF, the total FoG-Q score correlated with UPDRS III items 29, 30, and PIGD subscore, step time variability, and negatively with step length and velocity. Limitation of the study is a relatively small sample size. In conclusion, the Czech translation of FoG-Q is valid. With respect to gait and balance, FoG-Q does, to a certain extent, reflect the native state of the disease in patients treated with high frequency STN DBS.

Correlates of fear of falling and falls efficacy in geriatric patients recovering from hip/pelvic fracture

Objective: To gain a better understanding about the nature of fear of falling, this study analyzed associations between psychological and physical aspects related to fear of falling and falls efficacy in hip/pelvic fracture patients. Design: Baseline data of a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Geriatric inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Subjects: In all, 115 geriatric patients with hip/pelvic fracture (mean age: 82.5 years) reporting fear of falling within first week of inpatient rehabilitation. Interventions: None. Main measures: Falls efficacy (Short Falls Efficacy Scale–International; Perceived Ability to Manage Falls), fear of falling (one-item question), fall-related post-traumatic stress symptoms (six items based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) criteria), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery) and psychological inflexibility (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II) were assessed. Results: Path analyses demonstrated that low falls efficacy (Short Falls Efficacy Scale International) was significantly related to poor physical performance (β* = –.277, P ⩽ .001), but not to psychological inflexibility and fall-related post-traumatic stress symptoms (P ⩾ .05.). Fear of falling was directly associated with fall-related post-traumatic stress symptoms (β*= .270, P = .007) and indirectly with psychological inflexibility (β*= .110, P = .022). Low perceived ability to manage falls was significantly related to previous falls (β* = –.348, P ⩽ .001), psychological inflexibility (β* = –.216, P = .022) and female gender (β* = –.239, P ⩽ .01). Conclusion: Falls efficacy and fear of falling constitute distinct constructs. Falls efficacy measured with the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International reflects the appraisal of poor physical performance. Fear of falling measured by the single-item question constitutes a fall-specific psychological construct associated with psychological inflexibility and fall-related post-traumatic stress symptoms.

LO11: Influence of fear of falling on return to emergency department and further falls in community-dwelling elderly presenting for minor trauma

Introduction: According to WHO, one third of patients aged ≥65 fall every year. Those falls account for 25% of all geriatric emergency department (ED) visits. Fear of falling (FOF) is common in older patients who sustained a fall and is associated with a decline in mobility and health issues for patients. We hypothesized that there is an association between FOF and return to ED (RTED) and future falls. Objective: To assess the relation between FOF and RTED and subsequent falls in older ED patients Methods: This research was conducted as part of the Canadian Emergency Team Initiative in elderly (CETIe) multicenter prospective cohort study from 2011 to 2016. Participants: Patients 65 years or older were assessed and discharged from ED following a minor trauma. They had to be independent in all basic activities of daily living and being able to communicate in English or French. Measures: Primary outcome was RTED and secondary outcome was subsequent falls. Both were self-reported at 3 and 6 months. Patients were stratified according to Short Falls Efficacy Scale International (SFES-I) score, assessing FOF in different situations. A total score is calculated to determine the mild, moderate or severe level of FOF. Previous falls and TUG were used to evaluate patients’ mobility. OARS, ISAR and SOF were used to evaluated patient frailty. Descriptive statistical were performed and multiple regression were performed to show the association between SFES-1 score and outcomes. Results: FOF was measured in 2899 participants, of which 2214 participated at the 3 months follow-up and 2009 participated at the 6 months follow-up. Odds Ratio (OR) of return to ED at 3 months was 1.10 for moderate FOF and 1.52 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p = 0.11). At 6 months, OR was 1.03 for moderate FOF and 1.25 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p = 0.63). OR of subsequent fall at 3 months was 1.80 for moderate FOF and 2.18 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p &amp;lt; 0.001). At 6 months, OR of subsequent fall was 1.63 for moderate FOF and 2.37 for severe FOF (Type 3 test p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusion: The multicenter cohort study showed that severe fear of falling is strongly associated with subsequent falls over the next 6 months following ED discharge, but not significantly associated with return to ED episodes. Further research should be done to analyze the association between severe FOF and RTED.