Short-duration Ablation Research Articles

Temperature guided high and very high-power short duration ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment - The peQasus multicentre study.

Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) utilizing a novel ablation catheter (QDOT Micro) with real-time assessment of catheter tip temperature aims for safer, more effective and faster procedures. The peQasus study is a large European multicenter study set up to assess safety, acute efficacy and outcomes of temperature-controlled HPSD based PVI. The primary endpoints were safety, efficacy and 12-months freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias. Additionally, two strategies namely very HPSD (90W for 4 seconds) only and a hybrid approach (HPSD with maximum of 50W and vHPSD) were compared. A total of 1,023 AF patients in 15 centers from 9 European countries received PVI with the QDOT. Complete PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. In 699/1023 (68.3%) the vHPSD only approach (vHPSD group) and in 324/(31.7%) patients the hybrid approach (hybrid group) was utilized. The mean procedure duration was 98.4±37.4 min (vHPSD: 88.2±34.9min, hybrid: 117.4±32.7min, p<0.001). The first pass isolation rate of all PVs was 64% (vHPSD: 62.6%, hybrid: 67.1%, p=0.187). Severe adverse events were observed in 1.7% (vHPSD: 1.6%, hybrid: 1.9%, p=0.746). 12-month arrhythmia-recurrence free survival was 77.1% (vHPSD: 76.8%, hybrid: 77.8%, p=0.241). In this large multicentre study temperature-controlled HPSD and vHPSD ablation via a novel ablation catheter provides safe and effective PVI with a relatively short procedure duration. Despite a shorter procedure time no differences in terms of safety and freedom from arrhythmia-recurrence were found irrespective of utilizing vHPSD or the hybrid approach.

High-frequency very low-tidal volume ventilation during very high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. A case series of patients with atrial fibrillation.

High-frequency very low-tidal volume ventilation during very high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. A case series of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Impact of combining ablation index-guided and very high-power short-duration ablation at posterior wall adjacent to esophagus during perioperative period on procedural factors.

The impact of combining ablation index (AI)-guided and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation on procedural factors at the posterior wall near the esophagus is unclear. Atrial fibrillation patients who underwent initial ablation using three-dimensional mapping were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent only AI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (AI group) and those who underwent vHPSD ablation at the posterior wall adjacent to the esophagus in addition to AI-guided PVI (AI + vHPSD group). Differences in myocardial injury, inflammation, procedural characteristics, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns were assessed between the two groups. This study included 167 patients (AI group, 83 patients; AI+vHPSD group, 84 patients). No significant differences in high-sensitive troponin I or changes in inflammatory markers between pre- and Postablation were observed in either group. Total application time and total application energy were significantly lower in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (p < 0.001 for both) despite no significant difference in the total number of applications between the groups. The incidence of esophagus temperature ≥40 degrees was significantly lower in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (p = 0.036). However, the incidence of PV reconnections near the esophagus was significantly higher in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (11.9% vs 3.6%, p = 0.046), despite no significant difference in the incidence of PV reconnections overall. The combination of AI-guided PVI and vHPSD adjacent to the esophagus demonstrated reduced application energy requirements and maintained safety and effectiveness during the perioperative period.

Comparing cerebral microembolisation patterns between high power short duration and pulsed field ablation techniques using artificial intelligence based robotic transcranial doppler monitoring

Abstract Thromboembolism is a rare (&amp;lt;1%) complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation , but the incidence of silent ischaemic lesions (SIL) is 5-15% (1). Artificial intelligence (AI)-based robotic transcranial Doppler (r-TCD) enables real-time cerebral embolisation detection. We aimed to investigate the cerebral microembolization signal (MES) load with r-TCD of patients undergoing PF ablation, comparing the number of detected MES-s between 90 W radiofrequency (RFA) "very high power short duration (vHPSD) ablation" and "pulsed field ablation (PFA)" techniques. Our interim analysis included r-TCD registratums of 26 patients. 16 interventions were performed with VHPSD, 10 with PFA, during which we recorded the flow curve of the arteria cerebri media (ACM) bilaterally with r-TCD and analyzed the MES-s quantitatively and qualitatively with AI-based embolisation detection software. Postoperative cranial MRI exams were performed. Continuous variables were compared between the groups using a two-sample t-test, and categorical variables were compared using a Fisher exact test. The MES load by the different pulmonary veins was compared using Wilcoxon test and Bonferroni correction. A p-value below 0,05 was considered significant. The two groups were comparable regarding baseline parameters (mean age: 63 vs.58 p=0,253; EF:59% vs.62 .2% p=0,33). Ablations with vHPSD were significantly longer compared to PFA (88,7 min vs. 54,7 min p&amp;lt;0,001), left atrial time was significantly shorter with PFA (52,1 min vs. 29 min p&amp;lt;0 001), but the fluoroscopic time was significantly longer (5,4 min vs. 9,3 min p=0,009) during ablation with PFA. Neither solid emboli, nor ischaemic lesion or neurological deficit was detected. During the ablations, we saw an average of 246 gas MES-s with PFA and 138 with RFA (p=0,216). During PFA we analyzed the MES load per pulmonary vein: by the left superior vein we detected a median of 56,5 (IQR: 21,5-116,5), by the left inferior there were a median of 23 MES-s (IQR: 4,5 115,5), by the right inferior a median of 32 (IQR: 12-84,5), and by the right superior a median of 22,5(IQR: 8,5-70) respectively, p=0,03. While comparing each veins to each other, by the right vs. left superior vein, the p value resulted 0,01. On an initial sample,we detected known differences in the procedural parameters of the two interventions. There tended to be more MES-s during PFA, but this difference was not significant. Regarding the MES load by the ablation of different pulmonary veins, we found a significant overall difference between the MES load by the four veins, especially between the left and right superior vein. A larger number of interventions and r-TCD registratums is needed to determine the cerebral safety of PFA compared to RFA.

Feasibility and safety assessment of RF double applications in very high power and short duration ablation

BackgroundThe QDOT-MICRO catheter enables very high power and short duration (vHPSD) ablation. However, low first-pass isolation rates have been reported, possibly because of shallow lesion formation, necessitating deeper lesions to improve treatment outcomes. ObjectiveThis study aimed to confirm the safety and efficacy of double radiofrequency applications of vHPSD ablation in an in vivo beating swine heart model. MethodsEighteen swine were anesthetized and underwent vHPSD ablation using the QDOT-MICRO catheter at 90 W for 4 seconds, targeting a contact force of 10 g. Radiofrequency applications were performed as single application (SA) and double applications (DAs) with 4- to 8-second rest intervals. Lesion surface area and volume were measured postablation. ResultsA total of 337 atrial lesions and 74 ventricular lesions were created. Both 4- to 6-second DA and 7- to 8-second DA produced significantly larger and deeper lesions than did SA, with atrial surface lengths averaging 9.0 mm for 4- to 6-second DA, 9.2 mm for 7- to 8-second DA, and 8.0 mm for SA. Transmurality was observed at 100% for 4- to 6-second and 7- to 8-second DAs, while it was 94% for SA (P = .002). Ventricular lesion metrics followed similar trends. Except for 1 event of tiny char formation during 4-second DA in the ventricle, neither steam pops nor char formation was observed in either the atrium or the ventricle. ConclusionIn an in vivo swine heart model, DA with 4- to 6-second and 7- to 8-second intervals create deeper and wider lesions than does SA, suggesting its potential for clinical application in areas with thicker myocardial walls. However, DA with very short intervals may still pose a risk of excessive tissue heating.

Lesion characteristics using high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation versus standard ventilation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long-term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high-power short-duration ablation. Thirty-five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion. A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV.

Effectiveness of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation with ablation index-guided ablation compared with very-high-power, short-duration ablation: A retrospective, single-center study.

Effectiveness of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation with ablation index-guided ablation compared with very-high-power, short-duration ablation: A retrospective, single-center study.

Combined approach of high-power and very high-power, short-duration ablation in superior vena cava isolation.

The effectiveness and safety of 50 W, high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation in superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been reported. However, the acute outcomes of SVCI combined with 90 W/4 s, very high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) ablation remain unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate a novel approach that combines 50 W-HPSD and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation in SVCI and to elucidate the characteristics, outcomes, and safety of this approach by comparing SVCI with conventional ablation index (AI)-guided middle-power, middle-duration (MPMD) ablation. Overall, 126 patients who underwent AF ablation with SVCI using the QDOT MICROTM catheter were retrospectively reviewed; one group underwent SVCI with a combined approach of HPSD and vHPSD ablation (50 W/90 W group, n = 73) and another group underwent AI-guided MPMD ablation (30-40 W group, n = 53). This study compared the procedural details, radiofrequency (RF) ablation profiles, and complications. The RF settings used in the 50 W/90 W group were 50 W/7 s for the lateral segment close to the phrenic nerve and 90 W/4 s for the nonlateral segment. The 50 W/90 W group required a significantly shorter procedural time (3.2 vs. 5.9 min, p < .001), shorter RF duration (42.0 vs. 162.0 s, p < .001), and lower RF energy (2834 vs. 5480 J, p < .001) than the 30-40 W group. Procedural success, first-pass SVCI, number of RF applications, and SVC reconnection after isoproterenol loading were comparable between the groups. The maximum tip-electrode temperature of the multi-thermocouple system was significantly higher in the 50 W/90 W group than in the 30-40 W group (50.0°C vs. 47.0°C, p < .001). No complications, such as phrenic nerve injury or bleeding requiring transfusion, were observed in either group. The combined approach of 50 W/7 s-HPSD and 90 W/4 s-vHPSD ablation resulted in successful and safe SVCI with shorter procedural time, shorter RF duration, and lower RF energy.

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: Focus on the Latest Clinical Evidence.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are two common cardiovascular conditions that frequently coexist, and it has been widely demonstrated that in patients with chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation is associated with a significant increase in the risk of all-cause death and all-cause hospitalization. Nevertheless, there is no unanimous consensus in the literature on how to approach this category of patients and which therapeutic strategy (rhythm control or frequency control) is the most favorable in terms of prognosis; moreover, there is still a lack of data comparing the different ablative techniques of atrial fibrillation in terms of efficacy, and many of the current trials do not consider current ablative techniques such as high-power short-duration ablation index protocol for radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Eventually, while several RCTs have widely proved that in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, ablation of atrial fibrillation is superior to medical therapy alone, there is no consensus regarding those with preserved ejection fraction. For these reasons, in this review, we aim to summarize the main updated evidence guiding clinical decision in this complex scenario, with a special focus on the most recent trials and the latest meta-analyses that examined the role of catheter ablation (CA) in rhythm control in patients with AF and HF.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of High-power, Short-duration Ablation versus Low-power, Long-duration Ablation Strategy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects around 33 million people worldwide, rendering it a common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has evolved as a leading therapeutic intervention for symptomatic AF. This umbrella review systematically evaluates existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses to assess the safety, efficacy, and potential of high-power, short-duration (HPSD) ablation as an alternative therapy option for AF. A thorough exploration was undertaken across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify pertinent studies for inclusion in this umbrella review. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method was employed to assess the overall certainty of the evidence comprehensively, and the quality of the incorporated reviews was meticulously evaluated through use of the AMSTAR 2 tool, the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In this study, we initially identified 35 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrowing them down to a final selection of 11 studies, which collectively integrated data from 6 randomized controlled trials and 26 observational studies. For primary efficacy outcomes, the HPSD approach led to a non-significant decrease in the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.12; I 2 = 90%; P = .31) and a significantly reduced risk of AF recurrence (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.67; I 2 = 0%; P < .00001) compared to the low-power, long-duration (LPLD) approach. In terms of primary safety outcomes, the HPSD approach significantly reduced the risk of esophageal thermal injury (ETI) (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; I 2 = 0%; P < .00001) and facilitated a non-significant decrease in the risk of other major complications (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.03; I 2 = 0%; P = .10). In conclusion, HPSD therapy is safer and more effective than LPLD therapy, facilitating decreased AF recurrence rates along with reductions in ETI, total procedure duration, ablation number, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, and acute pulmonary vein reconnection.

The Feasibility, Safety and Outcome of Very High-Power Short Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Real-World Observation Study.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation is the established gold standard therapy for patients with symptomatic drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Advancements in radiofrequency (RF) ablation, have led to the development of the novel contact force-sensing temperature-controlled very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) RF ablation. This setting delivers 90 W for up to 4 seconds with a constant irrigation flow rate of 8 mL/min. The aim of this study was to compare procedural outcomes and safety with conventional radiofrequency ablation. An observational study was conducted with patients who underwent first time PVI ablation between August 2020 and January 2022. The cohort was divided into: (1) vHPSD ablation; (2) High-power short duration (HPSD) ablation; (3) THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF (STSF). The vHPSD ablation group was prospectively recruited while the HPSD and STSF group were retrospectively collected. Primary outcomes were procedural success, PVI duration, ablation duration and incidence of perioperative adverse events. Secondary outcomes were intraprocedural morphine and midazolam requirement. A total of 175 patients were included in the study with 100, 30 and 45 patients in the vHPSD, HPSD and STSF group, respectively. PVI was successfully attained in all vHPSD patients. vHPSD demonstrated significantly reduced time required for PVI and total energy application in comparison to the HPSD and STSF groups (67.7 29.7 vs. 92.9 25.7 vs. 93.6 29.1 min, p 0.0001; 9.87 4.16 vs. 33.9 7.49 vs. 36.0 10.5 min, p 0.0001, respectively). Intravenous morphine and midazolam requirement was lower in the vHPSD group compared to the HPSD and STSF groups (10.2 3.43 vs. 16.1 4.58 vs. 15.3 3.94 mg, p 0.0001; 4.04 3.24 vs. 8.63 5.22 vs. 8.58 4.72 mg, p 0.0001). One cardiac tamponade was observed in both the vHPSD and HPSD groups while the STSF group exhibited an embolic stoke and two pericardial effusions that did not require drainage. In this study, vHPSD demonstrated a comparable safety profile to the other treatment arms. Procedural duration and energy application time was substantially reduced along with sedation requirement notwithstanding the limitations of observational study design, these preliminary findings are promising with respect to periprocedural outcomes and safety of vHPSD however longitudinal outcomes will be essential to assessing the overall efficacy of this novel technology.

Pulsed field ablation versus very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation in atrial fibrillation: what is better?

Abstract Background The newly introduced non-thermal pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a promising technology for catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with high acute success rates and good safety features. However studies have shown that very high power short duration (VHPSD) ablation is also highly effective and fast with potentially less arrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Data comparing this two methods are lacking Objective The aim of this study is to compare two source of energy used for CA of AF in terms of procedural, clinical and outcome data Methods We conduced a retrospective observational study enrolling all patients (pts) from september 2021 to may 2023 who underwent CA of AF with PFA system and VHPSD. In the PFA group pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) was obtained using 2KV with eight application each vein, posterior wall isolation (PWI) of left atrium (LA) was obtained with application in the flower configuration of the catheter and then additional lesion were deployed at the operator’s discretion. In the VHPSD group the encircling of PV was obtained with 90W for 4 seconds radiofrequency pulses in posterior portions of the LA including LA PW, whereas 50W with ablation index target of 500 was used in the anterior portions of the PV and additional lesions. General anesthesia or deep sedation was carried out in all pts Results A total of 205 pts were included, n = 86 (42%) in the PFA group and N = 119 (58%) in the VHPSD group: paroxysmal (n = 62[72%], N = 64[54%]), persistent (n = 19[22%], N = 43[36%]), long standing persistent (n = 5[5%], N = 10[8%]). PVI was successful in all pts and additional lesions were delivered in n = 26 (30%) in PFA group and N = 76 (64%) in HVPSD group, mostly at the PW (n = 24[92%]; N = 50[66%]). The PFA group revealed a shorter procedura duration (80 ± 29 min vs 108 ± 39 min; p = 0,00001) but longer fluoroscopic time (21 ± 8 min vs 14 ± 10 min; p = 0,00001). The VHPSD group revealed more complications (N = 7[6%] vs n = 3[3%]) but without statistically significant difference (p = 0,43), the most frequent in the PFA group was vascular access complications instead in the VHPSD group was post-procedural pericarditis. Only one patient in VHPSD group had major complication with a post-procedural stroke but without residual neurological deficits. At follow-up after median of 14 (26-6) months, n = 61 pts in the PFA group (71%) and N = 91 in the VHPSD group (76%) were free from atrial arrhythmia (p = 0,79). In both group 7 pts recurrenced as atypical atrial flutter (n = 7[28%] PFA; N = 7[25%] VHPSD; p = 0,061) Conclusion PFA and VHPSD are effective and safe to CA of AF with comparable arrhythmia recurrenses. However procedure duration with PFA is significantly shorter and therefore may be of potential benefit in particular for elderly and frail pts. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to validate and compare these techniques more comprehensively

Characterization of conduction recovery and atrial electrophysiological properties after pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation

Abstract Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a relatively new technology for isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data addressing reasons for recurrent atrial fibrillation despite primarily successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA are scarce, due to an up to date limited number of patients treated this way. Objective The aim of this study was to analyze electrophysiological characteristics of reconduction and / or left atrial substrate of patients referred to our center for Re-Do procedures for recurrent AF after an initial PVI using PFA. Methods 90 patients (mean age 66±9 years, 69 male (77%)) had been treated in our center from November 2021 to July 2023 with PVI using PFA. 9 (10%) of these patients were referred for Re-Do procedures. These were performed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using Carto system including high density mapping and high power / short duration (HPSD) ablation. We analyzed location of PV reconnection and low voltage areas (LVA) in the left atria. Results 7 out of 9 patients (77%) presented with reconnections of pulmonary veins. In one patient a single vein showed reconduction (RSPV), in 5 patients 2 veins were conducting (1x LSPV, 3x LIPV, 1 left sided common os (LCo), 1x RSPV, 3x RIPV). None of the patients showed 3 or 4 reconnected veins. Areas of reconduction in each vein were: LSPV 1x ridge, 1x posterior; LIPV 1x posterior, 1x anterior and posterior; LCo 1x posterior, RSPV 1x anterior, 2x carina, 1x anterior and posterior; RIPV 1x complete, 2x carina. In 7 patients a fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy (FACM) was diagnosed via high density mapping of LVA’s. In 2 of these patients all 4 pulmonary veins were chronically isolated after the initial PVI. All patients except one (very small anterior LVA) with FACM ≥1 were treated with additional linear or encircling lesions according to the individual extent of the fibrotic areas. 2 patients had no LVA’s detectable. In one of those 2 patients 2 veins had reconnected. The other patient had chronically isolated veins (no proof of dormant conduction with adenosine) and no detectable non-PV-triggers under isoprenaline. Conclusion In the population of patients undergoing PVI using PFA in our center, only 10% had clinically relevant recurrences leading to the necessity of a Re-Do procedure. Most patients (77%) in this setting had reconnections of pulmonary veins. There is a tendency of posterior reconnections of the left pulmonary veins and reconnections of the carina of the right pulmonary veins, but the number of patients is too small to clearly define predilection sites that have to be paid attention to when using PFA. Additionally, left atrial substrate is an important problem in patients with recurrent AF despite primarily successful PVI and has to be considered and thoroughly addressed in Re-Do procedures.Reconnection of LSPV and anterior LVAAblation of RSPV and LSPV (posterior)

Impact of different ablation strategies during very high power short duration ablation: insights from the multicentric AIR HPSD registry

Abstract Background The very high power short duration ablation by mean of the QDOT Micro catheter was demonstrated to be safe and effective to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Data from large multicentric registries are still lacking. Purpose We sought to investigate whether different ablation approaches may impact procedural outcomes. First, the hybrid approach (Qmode+, 90 W for 4 sec, at the posterior wall of the left atrium and Qmode modality AI-guided at the anterior wall) was compared to the ablation performed exclusively with the Qmode+ modality. Second, we investigated the impact of the type of anesthesia. Methods The AIR HPSD registry is a multicentric real world data registry including patients undergoing AF ablation by mean of the QDOT Micro catheter. The ablation modality (hybrid/ Qmode+) and the type of anesthesia were left to operators’ preference. Results Overall, 330 patients were enrolled, 67% males, 71% had paroxysmal AF, the mean age was 61±11. Pulmonary vein isolation was reached in 100% regardless of the ablation modality or the anesthesia used. As for the first pass isolation (FPI) there was a trend toward higher rates in the hybrid group compared to the Qmode+ group (85% vs 74%, p=0.1). No differences in FPI were found between the general anesthesia/deep sedation group and the conscious sedation group (83% vs 81%, p=0.8), however when considering the Qmode+ group solely, the FPI was significantly higher in the general anesthesia/deep sedation group (84% vs 56%, p=0.006). As for the procedural time, this was significantly shorter in the general anesthesia/deep sedation compared to conscious sedation (82±21 vs 97±35 min, p&amp;lt;0.01), as well as in the Qmode+ group compared to the hybrid group (80±31 vs 102±30 min, p&amp;lt;0.01). Minor complications were observed in 1% of patients with no significant differences between groups. Conclusions The PVI can be safely and effectively obtained with both approaches, hybrid or Qmode+ solely, however the rate of FPI seems higher with the hybrid one. When adopting solely the Qmode+ modality the general anesthesia increases the rate of FPI.

Very high-power short duration ablation metrics predictors of successful pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Previous studies have shown that very high-power short duration (vHPSD) is a safe ablation modality, with similar rate of first pass isolation (FPI) but faster ablation times compared to standard CLOSE protocol guided ablation. While CLOSE protocol uses ablation index to guide energy titration no such index exists for vHPSD ablations yet. Purpose Our aim was to evaluate ablation metrics as predictors of FPI in atrial fibrillation ablation (AF) using vHPSD ablation modality. Methods In a single centre retrospective analysis, we analysed consecutive patients treated for paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) with PVI using vHPSD ablation from May 2021 to January 2023. We excluded patients with previous PVI procedures. The analysis was done via a cloud-based commercially available ablation analysis tool CARTONET. We analysed catheter stability, average contact force, absolute impedance drop, number of ablations and cumulative ablation time in relation to first pass isolation (FAAVI – first attempt all veins isolated). Results This is the first larger data study to evaluate ablation metrics in vHPSD using commercially available CARTONET (Figure 1). Based on the inclusion criteria 150 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics and procedural metrics are presented in Figure 2 - Table. We observed a numerical trend towards higher FAAVI rate with increasing patients number (p=0.10). Complication rate was low (1 pericardial effusion requiring drainage and 1 vascular access site complication). Ablation metrics analysis yielded statistical differences between FAAVI and no FAAVI groups (Figure 2 - Table). Multivariate analysis identified average contact force (odds ratio (OR) 1.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.999-1.003; p=0.047) and catheter stability (OR 0.985; 95% CI: 0.973-0.997; p=0.019) to be independent predictors of FAAVI. Additionally, number of applications (OR 1.000; 95% CI: 0.999-1.000; p=0.042) and total ablation time (OR 0.995; 95% CI: 0.991-0.999; p=0.021) were also independent predictors of FAAVI, possibly indicating larger vein and/or ablation circumferent line to be predictive of no FAAVI. Catheter stability of less than 1.16mm (AUC 0.61; p=0.015) was shown to be discriminative of FAAVI, however discrimination value was poor. Average contact force was not discriminative of FAAVI (AUC 0.58; p=0.105) in our patient cohort. Conclusion Average contact force and catheter stability were predictive of first pass isolation, however only catheter stability was discriminative of FAAVI. Larger data with standardised ablation protocol (interlesion distance) and wider range of ablation metrics is needed to corroborate and further build on these early findings.

Pulsed field ablation versus very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-centre experience

Abstract Background Pulsed Field ablation (PFA) has recently emerged as a treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and early studies showed promising procedural data and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, Very High-Power Short-Duration ablation (VHPSD) has previously reported good efficiency and mid-term outcomes, and only a few works compared these two procedures, especially in patients with persistent AF. Objective Our aim is to compare these different modalities of transcatheter ablation in patients with persistent AF, focusing mainly on some procedural aspects, safety and efficacy. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study enrolling all consecutive patients with persistent AF from September 2021 to May 2023 undergoing transcatheter ablation with PFA or VHPSD. In the first group, PVI was achieved by 2kV pulses with eight applications to each vein using both catheter configurations, while isolation of the posterior wall of the left atrium was achieved by applications through the only "flower" configuration; additional lesions were then added at the operator's discretion. In the second group, PVI was achieved by delivering 90W radiofrequency pulses for 4 seconds in the posterior portions of the left atrium and 50W pulses in the anterior region of the pulmonary veins; additional lesions were occasionally applied. All patients received general anaesthesia or deep sedation with fentanyl and dexmedetomidine. Results A total of 79 patients were included, n = 24 (30%) in the PFA group and N = 55 (70%) in the VHPSD one: early persistent AF (n= 2 [8,3%]; N = 7 [12,7%]), persistent AF (n= 17 [70,8%]; N = 36 [65,5%]), long-standing persistent AF (n= 5 [20,8%]; N = 12 [21,8%]). The two populations showed similar clinical features: CHA2DS2-VASc (median value 3 [0-6] in PFA vs 2 [0-6] in VHPSD, p = 0,10), indexed left atrial volume (mean value 42,6 ml/m² in PFA vs 42,4 ml/m² in VHPSD, p = 0,07) and EF (mean value 55,4% in PFA vs 54,8% in VHPSD, p = 0,33). PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. Nevertheless, the PFA group was associated with shorter procedural duration (92,1 ± 36,9 vs 134,2 ± 36,1 minutes, p = 0,00001) but longer fluoroscopy time (25,5 ± 9,3 vs 17,4 ± 11,5 minutes, p = 0,001); it also showed a lower rate of minor complications (n = 1 [4,2%] vs N = 3 [5,5%], p = 0,057), even though serious complications were not observed in either group. After a median follow-up of 14 (9-26) months, n = 19 [79.2%] in the PFA and N = 43 [78.2%] in the VHPSD population were free of any atrial arrhythmia (p = 0,92). Conclusion PFA allows faster procedures, representing a major advantage for the operator and the patient, who is at lower risk of peri-procedural complications. On the other hand, VHPSD correlates with shorter fluoroscopy times, reducing exposure to ionizing radiation. Finally, the two procedures show similar mid-term efficacy in terms of recurrence-free time.

Association between left atrial wall thickness and residual potential after first-pass pulmonary vein isolation using very high-power short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background In this study, we evaluated efficacy, efficiency, and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) applying vHPSD ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and explored the association between left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) and the residual potential after first-pass PVI. Methods Between April 2, 2023 and October 6, 2023, drug refractory symptomatic AF patients who underwent AF ablation using vHPSD ablation strategy with QDOT MICRO catheter were prospectively enrolled. All patients took cardiac computed tomography (CT) a day before procedure. Using CT image, LAWT map was created. PV segments were categorized into prespecified 14 segments, and LAWT of each segment, segments with residual potential (RP) after first-pass PVI and early reconnection after 20-minute waiting after PVI were evaluated. Total procedure time, ablation time for PVI, and occurrence of procedure-related complication were collected. Results A total of 40 patients were included (mean age 64 years, 45% of persistent AF). Additional ablation other than PV was performed in 48% of patients, total procedure time was 77 minutes, and total PVI time was 9.9 minutes. With vHPSD PVI, all PVs first pass isolation rate was 60%; in terms of per PV, RSPV first-pass isolation was 88%, followed by LSPV and LIPV 85%, RIPV showed lowest first-pass isolation rate, 75% (Figure A). Most common RP sites was right carina, followed by left carina (Figure A). Compared to historical comparator, vHPSD PVI showed shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, with numerically lower but statistically comparable first-pass PVI rate (Figure B). In total 560 PV segments in 40 patients, RSPV anterior, left carina, and right carina showed higher prevalence to be thick PV segments (over 60% of patients), followed by RPSV posterior, LSPV posterior, and RIPV anterior (over 40% of patients). Looking into ablation parameter detail, mean contact force was 10g, mean temperature was 47°C, and mean impedance drop was 8.4Ω. Compared to segments without RP, segments with RP showed thicker mean left atrial wall thickness grades, lower minimum contact force, higher maximum temperature, and lower minimum impedance drop. According to the left atrial wall thickness, thick PV segments showed higher prevalence of RP after first-pass PVI with vHPSD ablation. In segments with LAWT grade 3 or more, the RP rate was 9.1%. This thickness means thicker than 1.5 to 2.0 mm of thickness (Figure C). In 10% of patients (n=4) had audible or tactile steam-pops, visible char was confirmed in 5% of patients (n=2). There were no clinical complications. Conclusion PVI using vHPSD achieved shorter procedure time, shorter ablation time for PVI, and comparable first-pass PVI rate compared to historical comparator using ablation-index guided conventional power ablation. Thick segments had higher chance to have residual potential after first-pass PVI with vHPSD.

Application of high-power ablation mode in patients with idiopathic ventricular extrasystole

Background. A new method of high-power short-duration ablation (HPSDA) with high impact energy, ranging from 60 to 90 W, is becoming widespread in the world. However, the number of studies on the use of HPSDA in patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (IVA) is limited. It is relevant to study the feasibility of using HPSDA to improve the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with IVA. The aim of the study: to evaluate the immediate results of HPSDA in RFA for IVA and to compare it with the classic ablation mode. Materials and methods. We have retrospectively analyzed the results of RFA in 54 patients with symptomatic IVA. Their average age was 45.0 ± 11.7 years. The majority were men (72.3 %). Given the possible effect of intracardiac mapping on the results of ablation, the patients were divided into two groups. Group I include 27 (50 %) participants in whom mapping was performed using 3D navigation. Group II include 27 (50 %) patients in whom 3D navigation was not used. The decision to use HPSDA or classic ablation was made empirically, without considering any factors or characteristics of a patient. The following ablation parameters were used during HPSDA: temperature 45 °C, exposure time 7 seconds, energy 70 W. Results. In group I, where 3D navigation was used to localize the substrate, HPSDA was performed in 12 patients (44.4 %), and the classic mode was used in 15 cases (55.6 %). With conventional mapping, HPSDA was applied in 10 (37.0 %) patients, and the classic mode in 17 (63.0 %). Сlassic ablation allowed to achieve complete arrhythmia suppression in all patients, regardless of the mapping method. When using only HPSDA, the disappearance of arrhythmia was observed only in 45.5 % of cases. With the use of the classic mode, recurrence of IVA during the control time was observed in 16.6 % of patients, while with the use HPSDA in 33.3 %. Conclusions. The high-power regimen demonstrated significantly lower efficacy for permanent suppression of IVA compared to classic ablation methods (p = 0.007). The use of HPSDA to suppress IVA is associated with a high risk of arrhythmia recurrence during control time (p = 0.0010). It is advisable to convert the ablation mode for complete suppression of arrhythmia when the HPSDA is ineffective.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of a Very High-Power Very Short-Duration (vHPvSD) Ablation Protocol versus a Hybrid Ablation Approach-Procedural and Mid-Term Outcome Data.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard-of-care treatment in the rhythm control strategy of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation protocols, varying in the power and duration of energy delivery, have changed rapidly in recent years. Very high-power very short-duration ablation (vHPvSD) is expected to shorten procedural times compared to conventional ablation approaches. However, the existing data suggest that this might come at the cost of lower first-pass isolation rates, a predictor of poor ablation long-term outcomes. This study aims to compare a vHPvSD protocol to a hybrid strategy, in which the power and duration of the energy transfer are adapted depending on the anatomical location. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed procedural and outcome data from 93 patients (55 vHPvSD vs. 38 hybrid) scheduled for de novo pulmonary vein isolation. A vHPvSD ablation protocol (90 Watt (W), 4 s) was compared to a hybrid protocol using vHPvSD on the posterior wall and 50 W HPSD (high-power short-duration) ablation guided by the Ablation Index along the remaining spots. Results: Ablation times were significantly shorter in the vHPvSD cohort (5.4 min. vs. 14.2 min, p < 0.001), thus resulting in a significant reduction in the overall procedural duration (91 min vs. 106 min, p = 0.003). The non-significant slightly higher first-pass isolation rates in the vHPvSD cohort (85% vs. 76%, p = 0.262) did not affect freedom from AF 6 months after the procedure (83% vs. 87%, p = 0.622). Conclusions: vHPvSD helps in shortening the PVI procedural duration, thus neither affecting first-pass isolation rates nor freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 6 months after the index procedure.

Impact of weight adjusted high frequency low tidal volume ventilation and atrial pacing in lesion metrics in high-power short-duration ablation: Results of a pilot study.

Lesion size index (LSI) was introduced with the use of Tacticath™ and as a surrogate of lesion quality. The metric used to achieve the predetermined values involves combined information of contact force (CF), power and radiofrequency time. Rapid atrial pacing (RAP) and high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation (HFLTV) independently or in combination improve catheter stability and CF and quality of lesions. Data of the impact of body weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation strategy associated with RAP in the lesion metrics still lacking. The study aimed to compare the results of high-power short-duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation ablation using simultaneous weight adjusted HFLTV and RAP and standard ventilation (SV) protocol. Prospective, nonrandomized study with 136 patients undergoing de novo ablation divided into two groups; 70 in RAP (100 ppm) + HFLTV with 4 mL/kg of tidal volume and 25 breaths/min (group A) and 66 patients with SV in intrinsic sinus rhythm (group B). Ablation using 50 W, CF of 5-10 g/10-20 g and 40 mL/minute flow rate on the posterior and anterior left atrial wall, respectively. No procedure-related complications. Group A: Mean LSI points 70 ± 16.5, mean total lower LSI 3.4 ± 0.5, mean total higher LSI 8.2 ± 0.4 and mean total LSI 5.6 ± 0.6. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 6.0 ± 0.4 and 4.2 ± 0.3, respectively. Mean local impedance drop (LID) points were 118.8 ± 28.4, mean LID index (%) 12.9 ± 1.5, and mean LID < 12% points 55.9 ± 23.8. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LID index were 13.6 ± 2.0 and 11.9 ± 1.7, respectively. Recurrence in 11 (15.7%) patients. Group B: Mean LSI points 56 ± 2.7, mean total lower LSI 2.9 ± 0.7, mean total higher LSI 6.9 ± 0.9, and mean total LSI 4.8 ± 0.8. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 5.1 ± 0.3 and 3.5 ± 0.5, respectively. Mean LID points were 111.4 ± 21.5, mean LID index (%) 11.4 ± 1.2, and mean LID < 12% points 54.9 ± 25.2. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LID index were 11.8 ± 1.9 and 10.3 ± 1.7, respectively. Recurrence in 14 (21.2%) patients. Mean follow up was 15.2 ± 4.4 months. Weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation with RAP HPSD ablation produced lower recurrence rate and better LSI and LID parameters in comparison to SV and intrinsic sinus rhythm.