Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal Calculi Research Articles

Effect of Focal Zone Size on Treatment Outcomes and Renal Injury Following Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Background: The narrower focal zone (FZ) size of modern lithotripter was considered as one of the factors that resulted in suboptimal treatment result of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Therefore, we investigate the efficacy and safety of standard narrow or extended (FZ) sizes in SWL for patients with renal stones. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study conducted between April 2018 and October 2022, patients with renal stones were randomized to receive SWL with either standard or extended FZ. Treatment was delivered using a Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter with a maximum of 3000 shocks at 1.5 Hz. The primary outcome was treatment success 12 weeks after a single SWL session, defined as the absence of a stone or stone fragment <4 mm on computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of perinephric hematoma, stone-free rate (SFR), and changes in the urinary levels of acute renal injury markers. Results: A total of 320 patients were recruited, and 276 patients were randomized into the two groups. The two groups had similar baseline parameters. The treatment success rate was significantly better for standard FZ (74.3%) than the extended FZ group (59.3%) (p = 0.009). Standard FZ also had a significantly better SFR (Grade-A, 36.8% vs 23.0%, p = 0.013) and less pain after treatment. Both groups had similar perinephric hematoma formation rates, unplanned hospital admission rates, and changes in urinary acute renal injury markers. Conclusions: The standard narrow FZ has better treatment efficacy and similar safety compared with the extended FZ during SWL for renal stones. This clinical trial has been registered in the public domain (CCRBCTR) under trial number CUHK_CCRB00510.

277 - To investigate the effect of voltage escalation on treatment outcome in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi – final analysis

277 - To investigate the effect of voltage escalation on treatment outcome in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi – final analysis

776 - A prospective randomized study to investigate the effect of power ramping on treatment outcome in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi

776 - A prospective randomized study to investigate the effect of power ramping on treatment outcome in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi

Evaluation of long-term side effects after shock-wave lithotripsy for renal calculi using a third generation electromagnetic lithotripter.

To assess the incidence of long-term side effects after shock-wave lithotripsy treatment performed with an electromagnetic Dornier Lithotripter S device. A specific follow-up was undertaken on a cohort of 100 selected patients that underwent SWL for a single renal stone in our center from 2002 to 2004. Previous and current data were compared using the Student t test. Factors associated with the incidence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus were determined. Ten years after treatment, mean serum creatinine level and glomerular filtration rate remained similar to previous values (serum creatinine level: 0.96±0.22 vs. 0.92±0.19mg/dL; glomerular filtration rate: 92.8±17.8 vs. 88.1±21.7mL/min). There were marked increases in blood cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels, while smoking decreased. Age, glomerular filtration rate, body mass index, blood glucose and blood pressure at the time of treatment were significantly associated with the presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus at follow-up; blood cholesterol was associated with diabetes mellitus development. After 10years, overall renal function appeared to have been unaffected by shock-wave lithotripsy treatment. The increased rate of hypertension and diabetes mellitus were consistent with the incidence in the global population. This is the first report on the long-term safety of a third generation electromagnetic lithotripter, and indicates that there are no long-term sequelae.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in pediatric patients: A multivariate analysis model for estimating the stone‐free probability

To define factors affecting the stone-free rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric renal calculi, and to establish a regression model for pretreatment prediction of stone-free probability. From January 1999 through February 2012, 207 children with mean age 6.4 ± 3.8 years underwent shockwave lithotripsy with Dornier Lithotripter S for treatment of renal stones. The stone-free rate was evaluated 3 months after the last shockwave lithotripsy session with non-contrast computed tomography. Treatment success was defined as complete clearance of the stones with no residual fragments. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors and to predict the probability of being stone free. The mean length of the stone was 11.6 ± 4 mm. The stone-free rate was 71%. Independent factors that adversely affect stone-free rate were increasing stone length and calyceal site of the stone. Relative risks for not being free of stones were 1.123 for stone length, 2.673 for stones in the upper or middle calyx and 4.208 for lower calyx stones. Stone length and location are prognostic factors determining stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in pediatric patients. Based on our analysis, shockwave lithotripsy should be recommended for renal pelvis stones up to 24 mm, upper or middle calyceal stones up to 15 mm and lower calyceal stones up to 11 mm.

Natural History of Asymptomatic Renal Stones and Prediction of Stone Related Events

The appropriate management for asymptomatic renal stones remains unclear. We assessed the natural history and progression rate of such stones and identified clinical factors associated with an increased risk of stone related events. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 201 male and 146 female patients with asymptomatic renal stones. It was recommended that patients be followed every 6 months. Mean followup was 31 months (range 6 to 180). Patients were divided into 2 groups by stone related events, including spontaneous stone passage, flank pain, stone growth or the need for intervention during followup. Spontaneous passage occurred in 101 patients (29.1%). Of the patients 186 (53.6%) and 161 (46.4%) did and did not have stone related events, respectively. Of the whole cohort 85 patients (24.5%) required intervention but only 4.6% needed surgery. At 19 months after diagnosis 50% of the patients had a symptom. Those with stone related events were more likely to be younger (mean ± SD age 46.6 ± 12.7 vs 49.3 ± 12.6 years) and male, and have a stone history (p = 0.047, 0.017 and 0.014, respectively). Male gender significantly decreased the probability of freedom from stone related events (log rank test p = 0.0135) and it was an independent predictor of stone related events (HR 1.521, p = 0.009). Younger patients, and those with smaller stones and no stone growth were more likely to experience spontaneous passage and less likely to undergo intervention (each p <0.05). Asymptomatic renal stones can be followed safely but long-term followup is necessary. Periodic followup and early intervention should be recommended in patients with risk factors.

Tamsulosin and doxazosin as adjunctive therapy following shock-wave lithotripsy of renal calculi: randomized controlled trial

Alpha-blockers have been established as medical expulsive therapy for urolithiasis. We aimed to assess the effect of tamsulosin and doxazosin as adjunctive therapy following SWL for renal calculi. We prospectively included 150 patients who underwent up to four SWL sessions for renal stones from June 2008 to 2009. Patients were randomized into three groups of 50 patients each, group A (phloroglucinol 240 mg daily), group B (tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily plus phloroglucinol), and group C (doxazosin 4 mg plus phloroglucinol). The treatment continued up to maximum 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated for stone expulsion, colic attacks, amount of analgesics and side-effects of alpha-blockers. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding stone expulsion rates (84; 92 and 90%, respectively). The mean expulsion time of tamsulosin was significantly shorter than both control group (p = 0.002) and doxazosin (p = 0.026). Both number of colic episodes and analgesic dosage were significantly lower with tamsulosin as compared to control and doxazosin. Steinstrasse was encountered in 10 (6.7%) patients with no significant difference between the groups. 16 patients on tamsulosin and 21 on doxazosin experienced adverse effects related to postural hypotension. Moreover, 2 (4%) patients in the tamsulosin group reported ejaculatory complaints. In conclusion, adjunction of tamsulosin or doxazosin after SWL for renal calculi decreases the time for stone expulsion, amount of the analgesics and number colic episodes. There was no benefit regarding the overall stone expulsion rate. The side-effects of these agents are common and should be weighted against the benefits of their usage.

Comparative Results of Shockwave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi in Upper, Middle, and Lower Calices

To assess the results of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices according to the stone burden. A series of 52 female and 66 male patients with a mean age of 47.8 years and isolated single caliceal stones who underwent SWL monotherapy were enrolled. Stone burden, stone location, number of sessions/shockwaves, and auxiliary procedures were noted for each patient. Stones were located in the upper, middle, and lower calices of 35, 43, and 40, patients respectively, with mean stone burdens of 81.4 mm2, 75.2 mm2, and 96.3 mm2, respectively. Patients were evaluated with intravenous urography, plain film, or ultrasonography. Success was determined 3 months after the last session. Re-treatment rates were calculated. The effect of anatomic factors on the success of treatment for lower-caliceal stones also was determined. The mean stone burden, median number of treatment sessions, and mean number of shockwaves were 84.2 mm2, 2, and 4344, respectively. The auxiliary procedure rate was 16.1%, and the re-treatment rate was 71.2%. Failure was noted in 26 patients (22%). The stone-free rates for stones in the upper, middle, and lower calices were 82.8%, 83.4%, and 67.5%, respectively (P = 0.14). The stone-free rates for stones <100 mm2 and 100 to 200 mm2 were 91.2% and 65.5%, respectively (P = 0.001). The efficiency quotient was 49.8, 44.8, and 32.5 for upper-, middle-, and lower-caliceal stones, respectively. Infundibular length (P = 0.006) and infundibular width (P + 0.036) were significant in determining the stone-free rate after treatment of lower-caliceal stones. We recommend SWL as the first choice for treatment of stones <200 mm2 in the upper and middle calices. Extracorporeal lithotripsy is one of the options for lower-caliceal stones <200 mm2 but has high re-treatment and auxiliary-procedure rates in these cases.

The use of rigid ureteroscope in the treatment of ureteral steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of renal calculi: Case report

Exracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the first choice for patients with urolithiasis. Increased use of endoscopic techniques provided increased use of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of stones located in distal ureter, as well as ESWL. Rigid ureteroscope is usually used in the management of distal ureter stones, while middle and upper ureter stones should be treated by flexible ureteroscope or ESWL. At Urology Clinic in Novi Sad, ureteroscopy has been used since 1986, and more than 1000 procedures have been performed with success rate of over 95% (100% when we were able to reach the stone). The aim of this report is to show the destruction of stone along the ureter, using a rigid ureteroscope, shortly after the ESWL treatment of kidney stones. A 46-year-old woman was admitted to the Clinic with "steinstrasse" along the ureter, two weeks following ESWL of kidney stones. Primarily, she underwent ESWL without J-J stenting, at another urologic department. On admission to our Clinic, she complained of pain, nausea, mild temperature. An urgent diagnosis was carried out and left sided "steinstrasse" with hydronephrosis was confirmed by ultrasound, plain X-ray, laboratory findings. Ureteroscopy was performed under spinal anesthesia by rigid ureteroscope and the stone was destroyed along the ureter, even the pyelon was explored at the end of the procedure. The patient was advised to take a lot of fluids with diuretics and 80% of stones were eliminated in the first week after the procedure. At the first control, a month later, the patient was stone free. Rigid ureteroscope is a therapeutic option for distal ureteral stones, just as ESWL with comparable and reproducible results. This case confirms the fact that in strictly selected cases, and careful work of skilled urologists, rigid ureteroscope can be used for successful stone destruction in the middle and upper ureter.