Shield Graft Research Articles

An Innovation Technique in East Asia Rhinoplasty.

To investigate the application and therapeutic efficacy of a novel cartilage framework: the external septa framework in East Asian rhinoplasty. From November 2021 to April 2023, Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, treated 41 patients with autologous costal cartilage rhinoplasty using an innovation external septal framework. The surgical open approach used an inverted V-shaped trans-columellar incision and marginal incision. The sixth or seventh costal cartilage was harvested to form the nasal columella support grafts (strut), external nasal septal graft, cap grafts, and shield grafts, in which the nasal column support graft and external nasal septal graft are connected in a way of tongue in groove to form a external septum framework to support and lengthen the tip. A cap graft is used to shape the tip of the nose, the rectus abdominis fascia is used to cover the tip of the nose, and the shield grafts are used to augment the inferior lobules. ePTFE was sculpted according to the degree of augment of the nasal dorsum and implanted on the dorsal to augment the nasal dorsum. Clinical outcomes were assessed through standard facial photographs taken during the preoperative and follow-up periods, and a postoperative satisfaction survey was completed with regular follow-up using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation scale (ROE) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Results of objective and subjective measurements before and after surgery were compared utilizing paired-sample t tests. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant. Nasal framework's objective evaluation outcomes were assessed by measuring the patients' preoperative and postoperative nasolabial angle, nasal length, and nasal tip projection. (The distance between the pronasale and the alar-cheek junction was calculated as the tip projection.) The comparison of preoperative and postoperative nasolabial angle and nasal length was performed using the paired-sample t test, and the comparison of nasal tip projection was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test for the comparison of paired samples. Values of P < 0 .05 were considered significant. A total of 41 patients were treated, including 9 males and 32 females, ranging in age from 17 to 48 years(32.8 ± 1.5 years old), In the study, an average follow-up period of 19.85 ± 4.88 months was observed (range 12-29 months). There was no long-term or short-term complication observed. The aesthetic outcome of all cases such as saddle nose, deviated nasal columella, bilateral asymmetry of the nose, bilateral nasal base depression, and bulbous tip was satisfactory. Patient satisfaction evaluation: The ROE scale was (11.85 ± 2.46) preoperatively and (17.43 ± 2.15) postoperatively. The VAS scores were (4.86 ± 1.60) preoperatively and (8.48 ± 1.25) postoperatively. The difference of ROE scale and VAS scores among the patients was statistically significant (P < 0. 05), and 88.9% of patients were satisfied following those procedures. In terms of nasolabial angle, preoperative and postoperative measurements of 41 patients were (86.11 ± 2.25)° and (98.66 ± 1.90)°, respectively, and the difference of nasolabial angle was statistically significant (P < 0.05); nasal length measurements were 39.43 ± 1.55mm (37.95-43.51mm) preoperatively and 42.17 ± 1.46mm (40.23-45.62mm) postoperatively; in terms of nasal tip projection, preoperative and postoperative measurements of median values were 1.84(1.73,2.01)cm and 2.15(2.02,2.32)cm, respectively; and the difference between preoperative and postoperative values was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The innovative cartilage framework-external septal framework, avoids the dissection of septa and absorption of septal cartilage with compression of ESG, it is easy to be performed, and it is also stable and strong to achieve in good aesthetic result. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Rhinoplasty Exclusively Utilizing Autologous Costal Cartilage for Patients with Prior Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

Rhinoplasty in patients with previous unilateral cleft lip repair is a surgical challenge due to complex nasal deformities, including a horizontally positioned nasal wing, wide cleft side nostrils, nasal base defects, and a short and deviated nasal columella. To comprehensively address these complexities, we exclusively utilized autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty procedures, using various surgical techniques. This study presents a comprehensive case series of 39 patients who had previously undergone unilateral cleft lip surgery but still had nasal deformities. Rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage was performed at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam. Costal cartilage was partially crushed and then finely cut to shape the dorsal area and raise the nasal base on the cleft side. Partially crushed cartilage was also used to shape shield grafts, cap grafts, and alar batten grafts, whereas sliced cartilage was utilized for septal extension grafts. Evaluation was based on improvements in anthropometric indicators, patient satisfaction using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale and FACE-Q scores. The average age of patients was 25.13 years. All postoperative anthropometric indicators showed significant improvements. Postsurgery, the total ROE score was three times higher than before surgery (P < 0.001), and the total FACE-Q score was 2.26 times higher (P < 0.001). No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. This procedure effectively addresses complex nasal deformities in patients with prior unilateral cleft lip repair, emphasizing the value of autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty for such individuals.

Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty Performed in the Early Posttrauma Period after Nasal Bone Fracture.

The optimal timing of rhinoplasty for patients with nasal bone fractures remains controversial. We investigated whether the timing of rhinoplasty after nasal trauma affects the aesthetic outcome of the procedure. A total of 41 adult patients with nasal bone fractures who underwent rhinoplasty between 2006 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to indicate the assessor's satisfaction with the surgical outcome after a comparison of the pre- and postoperative facial photographs of each patient. Of the 41 patients, 28 underwent rhinoplasty within 14 days after nasal trauma (early rhinoplasty group), whereas 13 underwent rhinoplasty more than 14 days after nasal trauma (late rhinoplasty group). The rate of receiving spreader and shield graft was higher in the late rhinoplasty group (p = 0.043 and 0.018, respectively). Patients with type IV or V nasal bone fracture and patients with preoperative saddle noses had higher VAS scores than those with types I to III fractures and those without preoperative saddle nose (p = 0.003 and 0.020, respectively). There was no significant difference in overall aesthetic outcome between the early and late rhinoplasty groups. Both groups achieved significantly better radix height, dorsal height, and tip projection after rhinoplasty. The aesthetic outcome of rhinoplasty performed in the early posttrauma period is comparable with that of rhinoplasty performed more than 2 weeks after nasal bone fracture. Rhinoplasty can be considered a safe surgical treatment option for nasal bone fracture, even in the early posttrauma period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : 4.

Step by Step of a Creative Template for Rhinoplasty Training in Chicken Breast

Introduction: Rhinoplasty is a challenging surgery and provides balance, harmony, and symmetry to the face, so it should always be following the exact measurements and plan. Variations in techniques, measurements, and photographic studies have represented the surgeon's work tripod to optimize the aesthetic and functional results of nasal surgery. Furthermore, the creative template for rhinoplasty training will provide the young surgeons improve their practice and develop manual skills. Objectives: To demonstrate the rhinoplasty surgical sequence in a cadaveric animal (chicken) with an objective, systematic, and reproducible way for training the young surgeons. To establish grafts measurements in a clear, readable, and effective way. Casuistic and Method: This research is a prospective study for training the rhinoplasty technique in a cadaveric animal (chicken). The systematization of the surgical sequence in the animal model manufacture grafts for rhinoplasty in an objective way to simulate the nose. The breasts of cadaveric chickens coated with leather were selected and treated in the laboratory in São Paulo, Brazil. The models were photographed and filmed to record the stages of the grafts creation, such as spreader graft, columellar strut graft, shield graft, onlay graft, septal extension graft, alar batten graft, lateral strut graft, alar rim graft, free diced cartilage, combined graft, cap graft, and pump graft. The surgical materials are the same used in rhinoplasty, only in a small amount. Result: Surgical simulation model chicken sternal cartilage provides enough cartilage to practice rhinoplasty sculpting without involving live humans or human cadavers. The cartilage is abundant and properly to simulate the nose. The creative template is a clear, legible, and effective training of rhinoplasty grafts in an animal model. Conclusion: This article provides possibilities for training, creating grafts, and developing rhinoplasty techniques with the chicken breast cartilage. The creative template application shows an objective, clear, and systematic manner of learning without fear the beauty of the rhinoplasty art. This study is specially designed for young surgeons with a very low cost, artistry, and a reproducible way. No competing financial interests exist. No funding was received for this article. Runtime of video: 6 mins 44 secs

Combined Cartilage Graft Reconstruction of the Nasal Tip Complex after Resection of Nasal Tip Schwannoma: A Case Report

ABSTRACT&#x0D; Objective: To present a rare case of nasal tip schwannoma and describe its resection and reconstruction using combined cartilage grafts.&#x0D; Methods:&#x0D; Design: Case Report Setting: Tertiary Government Training Hospital Patient: One&#x0D; Results: A 13-year-old boy presented with a progressively enlarging nasal tip and severe left nasal obstruction causing breathing difficulties and psychosocial distress. There was a bulging septal mass obstructing 90% of the left nasal cavity. Septal incision biopsy revealed schwannoma and definitive surgery via open rhinoplasty approach was done. The non-encapsulated schwannoma extended from the subcutaneous nasal tip to the left septal mucosa. There was no evidence of skin or cartilage invasion, but prolonged pressure from the expansile schwannoma caused severe lower lateral cartilage and anterior septal atrophy leading to a collapsed and expanded nasal tip after resection. To correct this, a total reconstruction of the anterior tip complex was done using combined ear cartilage seagull wing graft, shield graft and septal extension graft. Conclusion: Nasal tip and septal schwannoma is rare and can cause significant nasal obstruction and deformity. Complete excision is vital to avoid recurrence. Total reconstruction of the lower lateral cartilages using autologous septal and ear cartilage grafts may be a safe and effective technique that yields acceptable aesthetic results.

Development and Evaluation of a High-Fidelity Rhinoplasty Simulator.

Rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure with a steep learning curve. Surgical simulators provide a safe platform to gain hands-on experience without compromising patient outcomes. Therefore, rhinoplasty is an ideal procedure to benefit from an effective surgical simulator. A high-fidelity rhinoplasty simulator was developed using three-dimensional computer modeling, three-dimensional printing, and polymer techniques. The simulator was tested by six surgeons with experience in rhinoplasty to assess realism, anatomic accuracy, and value as a training tool. The surgeons performed common rhinoplasty techniques and were provided a Likert-type questionnaire assessing the anatomic features of the simulator. A variety of surgical techniques were performed successfully using the simulator, including open and closed approaches. Bony techniques performed included endonasal osteotomies and rasping. Submucous resection with harvest of septal cartilage, cephalic trim, and tip suturing, as well as grafting techniques including alar rim, columellar strut, spreader, and shield grafts, were performed successfully. Overall, there was agreement on the simulator's anatomic accuracy of bony and soft-tissue features. There was strong agreement on the simulator's overall realism and value as a training tool. The simulator provides a high-fidelity, comprehensive training platform to learn rhinoplasty techniques to augment real operating experience without compromising patient outcomes.

Facial masculinization surgery

Facial masculinization surgery

A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study Between Cartilage and Fascia Tympanoplasty in a Tertiary Care Hospital to Look for Better Alternative in High Risk Cases.

CSOM patients are most commonly managed surgically by type I tympanoplasty using either cartilage shield technique or underlay grafting technique. In our study, we have compared the graft uptake and hearing results of type I tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia and cartilage shield, and also reviewed the literature regarding the results of these two methods. 160 patients aged between 15 and 60 years were randomized into two groups of 80 patients each, with odd numbers subjected to conchal or tragal cartilage shield grafting in group I, while in group II with even numbers, the patients underwent temporalis fascia grafting by underlay technique. Three months post-surgery, the graft uptake was seen in 76 patients (95%) in the cartilage shield group as compared to 58 patients (72.5%) in the temporalis fascia group, which was statistically significant between the two groups [Fisher's exact value = 0.000]. The uptake rate was much higher in cartilage shield graft as compared to fascia graft even in complicated cases like revision tympanoplasty (TP), discharging ear, subtotal perforation and retracted/adhered TP. Also, the hearing improvement in fascia and cartilage shield group was not statistically significant comparing pre- and post-operative patients, indicating that there was not much difference in audiological outcomes between the two groups. We advocate the use of cartilage shield graft as a substitute for fascia graft in all feasible cases as well as in complicated situations to improve the success rate of type I tympanoplasty, without compromising on the hearing improvement, as seen in our study. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03175-1.

Reorienting Lower Lateral Cartilages With Lateral Crural Struts: Aesthetic and Functional Benefits

Nasal tip shape and position play a major role in the aesthetic appearance of the nose. Cephalically oriented lower lateral cartilages (LLC) are associated with a broad boxy nasal tip. Reorienting cephalically positioned LLC with lateral crural strut grafts is a technique used to correct the nasal tip. An open approach surgical technique is described to evaluate the true orientation of the LLC and correct the boxy nasal tip. Five cases are shown with pre- and post-op pictures. The identical surgical technique is used in all cases with a variation in grafts necessary to create the desired esthetic result. All 5 described cases are on female patients. In all cases, reorientation of the lateral crura with lateral crural strut grafts were performed. In all, 4 of the 5 cases required a columellar strut graft, 3 cases required a shield graft to increase nasal tip projection and control the columellar-lobular angle, and 2 cases required spreader grafts for internal nasal valve support. All 5 cases required a variation of inter and intra-domal suture techniques to refine the nasal tip. A boxy nasal tip with supra-tip fullness is commonly associated with cephalically oriented LLC. Changing the orientation of the LLC to a more favorable angle and using lateral crural strut grafts can be used to not only correct the nasal tip deformity, but also facilitate projecting/de-projecting the nose, changing the rotation of the tip, and also supporting the external nasal valve. Reorienting cephalically oriented LLC is a versatile approach to reshaping the nasal tip. It is a technically demanding maneuver that when executed, allows complete control of the nasal tip complex. We have used this approach in many cases involving a boxy nasal tip with long ptotic tips and poorly supported external valves.

Endoscopic Tympanoplasty: The Fringed Shield Technique

Introduction: Endoscopic tympanoplasty has become popular in the past few years. To reach anterior quadrants of the middleear for adequate graft setting and complete perforation closure, most surgeons detach the remaining tympanic membrane from the umbus. This maneuver may cause elevation of the anterior tympanomeatal angle and result in blunting and worse audiometric thresholds. Objectives: Describe a tympanoplasty endoscopic technique with a modified full thickness cartilage graft that allows its positioning without the need to detach the malleus handle from the tympanic membrane. Data Synthesis: Because endoscopic ear surgery is an one-handed procedure, the graft needs to be stiff and easy to manipulate to facilitate its positioning and complete closure of the tympanic perforation. We describe a full thickness tragal cartilage graft shaped as an oval island with a wedge to accommodate the malleus handle and with the anterior and posterior edges fringed. This design allows its positioning in an underlay technique without the need to detach the malleus handle from the tympanic membrane. Thereby, without this maneuver, it is possible to prevent blunting and, consequently, reduce the odds of hearing loss. Conclusion: The fringed shield technique is a promising endoscopic approach with good hearing results. Although the hearing outcomes presented in this paper are not exclusive for the fringed shield technique, we would not expect different results since we have applied full thickness cartilage graft in most cases. Nevertheless, a larger series of patients submitted exclusively to the fringed shield graft would be necessary to confirm these data.

Outcomes of Type I Tympanoplasty using a Cartilage Shield Graft

Background: Type I tympanoplasty surgery is an effective routine technic that had been used for tympanic reconstruction to improve hearing. Objectives: The aim was to measure the effect of type I tympanoplasty surgery using the cartilage shield graft (CSG) in term of graft uptake (anatomical outcome) and hearing gains (functional outcomes) of patients with poor prognostic factors. Method and Materials: In this study, 20 patients with perforation exceeded 50%, but limited to the tympanic membrane were recruited for type I tympanoplasty surgery. The study was conducted in the Otolaryngology/Head and Neck surgery training center in Sulaimani Teaching Hospital in Sulaimani city for one year period. Bellucci classi?cation was used to evaluate otorrhea risks. Results: The majority of patients were female (90%), with a mean ± SD (standard deviation) of ages of 37.15 ± 14.01 years. Most of the patients (40%) were presented with a mild hearing loss of 26-40 decibels (dB). Type I tympanoplasty surgery using the cartilage shield graft (CSG) had significantly decreased the hearing loss and air-bone gap (p-value = 0.046 and 0.006, respectively). The mean differences in hearing loss and air-bone gap were 5.05 dB and 6.75 dB, respectively. Conclusions: CSG in type I tympanoplasty surgery is an effective solution in anatomical outcome (Graft uptake) and functional outcomes (hearing gains) which had been reflected in reducing hearing loss and air-bone gap (average hearing gain of 5dB) in patients presented with tympanic membrane perforations. No improvement in the functional outcomes was observed in patients presented with severe hearing loss pre-operatively.

Sublabial Approach to Tip Rhinoplasty: A Cadaver Model

Objectives The main objective of this study was to investigate the utility of the sublabial approach in gaining proper exposure for tip rhinoplasty maneuvers in a cadaver model. Additional objectives included identifying types of grafts that can be placed sublabially and whether these methods can be translated successfully to human subjects. Methods Ten (N = 10) fresh-preserved cadavers were dissected at our academic institution from August 18, 2019 through February 5, 2020. Photographs of the cadavers were taken with permission from the anatomy laboratory manager using an iPhone 10 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA). Standard rhinoplasty views were taken of all ten cadavers. Results Grafts were harvested and designed from septal (80%), auricular (50%) and rib cartilage (40%). The division of depressor septi muscle was accomplished in all ten (100%) cadavers to address tip ptosis. Placement of the columellar strut and shield grafts resulted primarily in the improvement of nasal projection as well as rotation in all (100%) cadavers. Premaxillary augmentation was not always indicated but helped to improve an acute, retrodisplaced nasolabial angle in three (30%) cadavers. Lateral osteotomies via this approach addressed the nasal bony pyramid in all ten (100%) cadavers. The swinging door technique enabled correction of the caudal septum in six (60%) cadavers. Conclusions Several rhinoplasty techniques can be successfully performed on cadavers via the sublabial approach and we hope this work can be translated to human subjects.

Comparing autologous versus allogenic rib grafting in pediatric cleft rhinoplasty

BackgroundPatients with cleft lip with or without cleft palate suffer from varying degrees of nasal deformity, often requiring nasal reconstruction to provide improved form and function. Rib cartilage is an excellent source of grafting material for nasal reconstruction and is available either as an autologous or allogenic graft. There is a paucity of literature comparing outcomes of autologous and allogenic rib grafts in pediatric cleft rhinoplasty. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent cleft rhinoplasty with autologous or allogenic rib grafting at a tertiary pediatric hospital between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2017. Outcome data were gathered over a 6-month postoperative period. ResultsThere were 23 cleft rhinoplasties performed with rib graft, 12 with autologous rib and 11 with allogenic rib. Those in the autologous group tended to be older than those in the allogeneic group (15.6 ± 4.4 v 12.4 ± 5.2 years, p = 0.13). The most common types of grafts used were columellar strut (20/23), shield graft (9/23), and unilateral or bilateral batten grafts (7/23). Length of stay was significantly longer for patients who underwent autologous rib grafting compared with those with allogenic rib grafting (25.8 ± 4.7 v 11.9 ± 7.2 h, p < 0.05). Each group reported one complication. ConclusionAutologous and allogenic rib grafts are safe and effective in pediatric rhinoplasty. The most common grafts used in this sample were columellar strut, batten, and shield grafts. Autologous rib grafts were more likely to be used in older patients and require longer hospital stay compared to allogenic grafts.

Falconry graft: a predictable technique to restore soft triangle defects in rhinoplasty

The nasal soft triangles are extremely vulnerable subunits of the nose that are prone to severe unaesthetic deformities. A technique to overcome these problems, comprising an effective simple modification of the shield graft, is presented. Using this technique, many existing soft triangle deformities, notches, and defects are easily restored. It may also be applied effectively in susceptible cases in order to avoid these complications. This article presents technical details and the cases of two patients treated with the technique, which indicate its potential utility.

Is Cartilage Shield Tympanoplasty better than Fascia Tympanoplasty

Background Temporalis fascia and cartilage are the most commonly used graft materials, though contradictory reports are available in literature as regards their efficacy in Tympanoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the graft uptake rates and hearing results in case of temporalis fascia and cartilage in type 1 tympanoplasty Material and Method A total of 400 cases with large, subtotal and total perforation were considered in the study. All the selected patients were divided into two groups. Group A in which temporalis fascia graft was used and including 200 cases and cartilage graft was used in group B patients including 200 cases. Pure tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results The graft uptake rate were more than 90 percent and more than 80 percent in group B respectively at the end of 14 week Conclusion From our study we came to the conclusion that both cartilage shield graft and temporalis fascia graft can be used as graft materials independently in Tympanoplasty. But the results of our study suggest that cartilage shield Tympanoplasty can be considered as the first line treatment in chronic otitis media especially with moderate/large/subtotal perforations with good success rate and hearing improvement.

Classification pattern and step-by-step procedure for cartilage grafts with silicone implants for nasal tip plasty in Asians

Dorsal augmentation using silicone and tip plasty with autogenous cartilage is commonly performed in Asians. No study has investigated the classification pattern and step-by-step procedure for tip plasty using silicone implants. Therefore, this study classified cartilage grafts using silicone implants in Asians and developed a step-by-step procedure for their implementation. The study included 39 patients who had undergone augmentation rhinoplasty with a silicone implant combined with a conchal cartilage graft as a shield, an onlay graft, or both. We classified the implant-conchal cartilage complex into two main types (edge and no-edge types). In the edge type, the shield graft tip was located 1-2mm above the silicone implant or onlay graft. In the no-edge type, it was located at the same level as the silicone implant or onlay graft. Each type was classified into three groups depending on the number of onlay grafts: group I, 0; group II, 1; and group III, ≥2. The cartilage complex was placed on the dorsum. The conchal cartilages were harvested through a post-auricular incision while preserving the radix helicis as cartilage bars. The donor site was closed primarily without a tie-over dressing. Of the 39 patients, 35 were satisfied with the outcome. Three revision operations for implant displacement and one revision for a patient who changed her dorsal height preference were performed. No donor site morbidity occurred. This method may be safe and reliable, with minimal morbidity associated with graft harvesting for tip plasty in Asians.

Outcome of conchal cartilage shield type I tympanoplasty: a prospective study of 70 patients

&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Tympanoplasty is a surgical procedure performed to reconstruct hearing mechanism with or without reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforation. Cartilage shield tympanoplasty was first reported in literature by Duckert et al in 1995.The purpose of the present study was to prepare the cartilage shield graft and to evaluate its effect on the success rate of tympanoplasty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; In this study 70 patients who presented to ENT OPD of Aarupadai Veedu medical college, Puducherry, with chronic otitis media (COM) mucosal type, who were treated during the period between December 2016 to April 2018 were enrolled. Patients with COM mucosal type, with mild to moderate conductive hearing loss, dry or moist ear were included in the study. Detailed history was taken in the selected patients including a thorough otological examination and blood investigations required for surgery. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; In the present study male to female ratio was 1.6:1. 30% patients were in the age group between 20-24years. In our study 33% patients had pre-operative airbone gap in the range of 31-40 dB and post-operative improvement in airbone gap was in the range of 0-10 dB in 49% patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="abstract"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt; Conchal cartilage shield tympanoplasty is an effective technique in tympanic membrane reconstruction and shows no detrimental effect to the hearing outcome. Conchal cartilage is preferred graft as it can be harvested from same incision. The graft uptake rates are excellent with this technique.&lt;/p&gt;

Is Cartilage Shield Tympanoplasty better than Fascia Tympanoplasty

Background Temporalis fascia and cartilage are the most commonly used graft materials, though contradictory reports are available in literature as regards their efficacy in Tympanoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the graft uptake rates and hearing results in case of temporalis fascia and cartilage in type 1 tympanoplasty Material and Method A total of 400 cases with large, subtotal and total perforation were considered in the study. All the selected patients were divided into two groups. Group A in which temporalis fascia graft was used and including 200 cases and cartilage graft was used in group B patients including 200 cases. Pure tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results The graft uptake rate were more than 90 percent and more than 80 percent in group B respectively at the end of 14 week Conclusion From our study we came to the conclusion that both cartilage shield graft and temporalis fascia graft can be used as graft materials independently in Tympanoplasty. But the results of our study suggest that cartilage shield Tympanoplasty can be considered as the first line treatment in chronic otitis media especially with moderate/large/subtotal perforations with good success rate and hearing improvement.

Nasal Tip Grafts.

The nasal tip is the most prominent part of the nose. The aim of this paper is to review nasal tip grafts with detailed explanation and figures. The authors searched PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and Proquest Central database of the Kirikkale University. Search was performed with the key words of "nasal," "tip," "graft." The indications and grafting techniques were presented. The external shape of the nasal tip is determined by the curves and contours of the lower lateral cartilages and their interactions with the surrounding tissues. Normative data exist regarding the ideal shape and shadowing of the nasal tip. The mainly used tip grafts in rhinoplasty are "Floating graft (Goldman) ," "Tip Onlay Graft," "Columellar Strut Graft," "Caudal Septal Extension Graft," "Shield Graft," "Alar batten onlay graft," "Lateral Crural Strut Grafts," "Alar rim grafts." When tip sutures are not enough, cartilage tip grafts offer a versitile and effective way to change the nasal tip. While there has been a vast array of grafting techniques described, this paper reviewed many of the most popular and useful grafts in modern use.

Safety and Efficacy of Cosmetic Augmentation of the Nasal Tip and Nasal Dorsum With Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is a widely used alloplast, but studies of augmentation of the nasal tip and nasal dorsum with ePTFE are lacking. To investigate whether attaching the conchal cartilage as shield grafts at the distal end of the graft can prevent extrusion and whether the use of ePTFE in the nasal tip can achieve a stable aesthetic outcome. A randomized clinical trial was performed from April 1, 2006, to October 31, 2008. Follow-up was completed in 2012 and 2017. The study was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. One hundred fifty patients seeking rhinoplasty were recruited, and 129 were eligible for inclusion in the study. All the recruited patients were intent-to-treat populations who were randomized into 2 groups: an ePTFE-only group and an ePTFE with conchal cartilage group. Expanded PTFE was used for augmentation of the nasal tip and nasal dorsum in both groups. Conchal cartilage was placed above the distal end in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group. Preoperative and postoperative standard photographs were obtained. Postoperative satisfaction and complications were evaluated. Of the 129 patients (mean age [range], 28 years [21-45 years]; 6 male and 123 female) eligible for inclusion in this study, 76 (mean age [range], 31 years [22-45 years]; 4 male and 72 female) were available for follow-up (mean [range], 106.9 months [100-131 months]) through 2017, including 39 in the ePTFE-only group and 37 in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group. Infection occurred in 2 patients (5%) in the ePTFE-only group vs 1 patient (3%) in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group (infection rate [OR, 1.946; 95% CI, 0.169-22.413; P > .99]). Soft-tissue reaction occurred in 0 patients in the ePTFE-only group vs 1 patient (3%) in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group (soft-tissue reaction rate [OR, 0.000; 95% CI, 0.000-8.538; P = .49]). Irregularity occurred in 0 patients in the ePTFE-only group vs 3 patients (8%) in the ePTFE with conchal cartilage group (irregularity rate [OR, 0.000; 95% CI, 0.000-1.066; P = .11]). Extrusion occurred in neither of the 2 groups. A new technique using ePTFE alone for augmentation of the nasal tip and nasal dorsum achieved safe, attractive, and acceptable outcomes in nasal contouring and patient satisfaction. The use of conchal cartilage as a shield in the nasal tip is not necessary. 1. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR-INR-17011101.