Dutch (1979) states that pre-Sudbury breccia tectonic structures are confined to the immediate vicinity of the Creighton pluton and are not present in the country rocks in areas removed from this body. His contention that this early deformation is 1 attributable to forceful (diapiric) emplacement of the pluton is based in large part on the assumptions that: (1) the pluton was emplaced as a diapir capable of generating and transmitting the necessary stress; and (2) there was no deformation of regional significance prior to the formation of the Sudbury I breccia (and, by inference, the associated Sudbury : Nickel Irruptive and Whitewater Group). The Creighton pluton was forcefully emplaced into its host rocks, but this probably occurred in connection with a tectono-metamorphic event of regional significance. The pluton does not display many of the features characteristic of diapirs, such as outward-plunging lineations, a rim syncline, or development of contact shear and mylonite zones (Stephannson 1977). It does contain abundant, rotated country-rock inclusions. The contacts between the granite and the inclusions are generally sharp and unsheared and many inclusions display metamorphic reaction rims indicating lack of postsolidification movement (see Card 1968, photo 7, page 15). Numerous granite dykes and apophyses cut the inclusions and extend into the country rocks. Agmatitic contact zones of foliated countryrock inclusions in foliated granite are present (Card 1978a). These features, along with its porphyritic texture and restricted composition indicate that the Creighton pluton was emplaced as a magma, primarily by a block-stoping mechanism, rather than as a diapir. The structural patterns observed by Dutch (closed foliation loop in an inclusion, parallelism of foliation to contacts, etc.) are probably ascribable to the combined effects of preintrusion deformation of the country rocks, magi matic (crystal mush) Row, and later, superimposed deformation that has affected the pluton, its inclusions, and the country rocks (Card 1978~). In stating that there was no deformation of regional significance prior to the formation of the Sudbury breccia (and hence no pre-breccia tectonic structures in areas removed from the Creighton pluton), Dutch follows Brocoum and Dalziel's (1974) contention that the Sudbury Structure and the adjacent Southern and Grenville Provinces were affected by a single, post-Nickel Irruptive tectonometamorphic event. Brocoum and Dalziel's hypothesis is untenable for a number of reasons, including the following: (1) There is geological, geochronological, and paleomagnetic evidence for a regional event involving deformation, metamorphism, and plutonism prior to emplacement of the Nipissing Diabase some 2150 Ma ago (Card 1968; Church and Young 1972; Van Schmus 1976; Morris 1977). Indeed, emplacement of the Creighton pluton some 2200 Ma ago is part of this event. (2) The available geochronological data indicate that major metamorphism of the Huronian occurred about 1900 Ma ago (Fairbairn et al. 1969; Van Schmus 1976) prior to the formation of the Sudbury breccia and emplacement of the Nickel Irruptive some 1840 Ma ago (Krogh and Davis 1974). Huronian rocks, both regionally and adjacent to the Nickel Irruptive, have metamorphic mineral assemblages and structural elements that are not present in the Nickel Irruptive or the Whitewater Group. Huronian rocks adjacent to the Nickel Irruptive have mineral assemblages diagnostic of the amphibolite facies. The Nickel Irruptive and the Whitewater Group, in contrast, display low greenschist facies assemblages (Card 1978b). Regionally, the Huronian rocks display several generations of major and minor tectonic struc-