Sham Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Research Articles

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave combined with Kinesio taping on upper limb function during individuals with biceps brachii tendinopathy：protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial

IntroductionLong head of biceps brachii tendinopathy (LHBT) is characterised by persistent pain and disability of shoulder joint, impairing patients’ quality of life. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a non-invasive...

Comparative Effects of Focused and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapies on Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomised Sham-controlled Trial.

To evaluate and compare the effects of radial and focused types of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on lateral epicondylitis. A randomised sham-controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Sports Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University Hospital, Van, Turkiye, from August 2019 to April 2020. Patients with acute lateral epicondylitis were randomised into focused, radial, and sham ESWT groups. The ESWT was applied for three sessions at 2-4 days intervals. All the subjects were evaluated at baseline (week 0), week 5, and 13. Patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) scores were used as outcome measures. At weeks 5 and 13, all PRTEE scores (pain, function, and total) were remarkably improved in the focused and radial groups (p<0.001), but not in the sham group (p>0.05). Focused ESWT was superior to radial ESWT for the change of pain scores from baseline to week 5 (18.8±13.9 vs. 11.8±9.1; p=0.026) and week 13 (17.8±13.1 vs. 11.7±10.5, p=0.084). Focused ESWT was more effective than radial ESWT for the change of function scores from baseline to weak 5 (17.9±12.5 vs. 11.2±9.5; p=0.025) and week 13 (16.9±11.6 vs. 10.7±10.1; p=0.032). Focused ESWT was superior to radial ESWT for the change of total scores from baseline to week 5 (36.7±25.9 vs. 23.0±17.2; p=0.021) and week 13 (34.7±24.3 vs. 22.4±18.5; p=0.044). Focused and radial ESWT are effective in lateral epicondylitis. The focused ESWT is superior to the radial ESWT. Thus, focused ESWT should be preferred in lateral epicondylitis. Lateral epicondylitis, Shock wave, Randomised sham-controlled trial.

Comparative effects of radial and focused extracorporeal shock wave therapies in coccydynia.

This study was conducted to compare the effects of radial and focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with coccydynia. In this prospective randomized double-blind study conducted between March 2021 and October 2021, 60 patients with coccydynia (50 males, 10 females; mean age: 35.9±12.0 years, range 18 to 65 years) were randomized into three groups (n=20) according to different wave types of ESWT: focused, radial, and sham. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used for pain assessment, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used for functional assessment in all patients before the treatment (baseline), after the completion of four sessions of treatment (fourth week), one month after the end of the treatment (eighth week), and three months after the end of the treatment (16th week). The mean body mass index of the participants was 26.2±3.0. Compared to baseline, the VAS scores at four weeks were reduced only in the radial ESWT group (p<0.05). Compared to baseline, the VAS and ODI scores at eight and 16 weeks were significantly reduced in both the focused and radial ESWT groups (p<0.05 for all). The radial ESWT group was significantly superior to the focused ESWT group in the comparisons between the groups at four weeks in the VAS values and at 16 weeks in the ODI scores (p<0.05 for all). Radial and focused ESWT are both effective in treating coccydynia compared to sham ESWT. However, radial ESWT may be more effective in the treatment of coccydynia.

Dosing and efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for diabetic foot ulcer healing: a systematic review protocol

Background: Effective interventions to improve diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) healing are urgently required. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has the potential to transform DFU care, but is limited by uncertainties around clinical effectiveness and optimal dosing regimen. This protocol outlines the methodology of a systematic review that will address these unknowns. Methods: Databases and the grey literature will be searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ESWT plus standard ulcer care to standard ulcer care ± sham ESWT in patients with a DFU. The primary outcome of the review is time to ulcer healing. Two independent reviewers will screen search results against pre-determined eligibility criteria and extract data onto a pre-piloted spreadsheet. A meta-analysis is planned to compare time to healing for ESWT versus standard care and different doses of ESWT. The Risk of Bias 2 and GRADE tool will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. Outputs, dissemination, impact: The review will provide an estimate of the effect of ESWT on DFU healing and the impact of the ESWT dose on DFU healing. The systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. A plain English summary will be produced. Outputs from the review will guide patient care and research.

Effect of session frequency of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy on gastrocnemius muscle spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial

Background/aims Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has been effective in reducing spasticity in patients with spastic cerebral palsy, but there has yet to be a recommended guideline for the treatment of spasticity in children using extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of session frequency of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy on gastrocnemius muscle spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Methods This was a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial consisting of 14 patients with spastic cerebral palsy (8 boys and 6 girls), aged 5 to 12 years, who were divided into two groups. Group 1 received five true radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy sessions. Group 2 received three true radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy sessions and two sham extracorporeal shockwave therapy sessions. The Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale was measured at nine time points: 1) pre-extracorporeal shockwave therapy, 2–6) immediately after each radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy session, 7) 4 weeks after the fifth radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy session, 8) 8 weeks after the fifth radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy session, and 9) 12 weeks after the fifth radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy session. Results Both groups had a significant reduction in degree of resistance to passive movements of ankle plantar-flexor muscles measured using the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale at all time points, relative to baseline. The mean ankle Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale in the two groups were not significantly different after the fifth extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment (group 1: 1.13 ± 0.62; group 2: 1.50 ± 0.90, P=0.28), 4 weeks after the fifth radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment (group 1: 1.12 ± 0.66; Group 2: 1.50 ± 0.90, P=0.40), 8 weeks after the fifth radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment (group 1: 1.25 ± 0.68; group 2: 1.50 ± 0.90, P=0.54) and 12 weeks after the fifth radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment (group 1: 1.19 ± 0.75; Group 2: 1.58 ± 0.90, P=0.28). Conclusions: The effect of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy on spastic gastrocnemius in children with spastic cerebral palsy is not dependent on session frequency. There has yet to be a recommended guideline and research showing the factors that affect the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy on spastic gastrocnemius muscles in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement standard. We identified relevant studies by searching multiple electronic databases, trial registries, and websites up to April 30, 2021, and examining reference lists. We selected RCTs that compared ESWT, in unimodal or multimodal therapeutic approaches, with sham ESWT or other active therapies. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of the evidence. The main outcomes were pain intensity and disability status, examined as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias was assessed by using Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) Group risk of bias tool and Jadad score, and GRADE was applied to determine the confidence in effect estimates. Heterogeneity was explored using sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. Results Ten RCTs, including a total of 455 young to middle-aged individuals (29.2–55.8 years), were identified. Compared with control, the ESWT group showed lower pain intensity at month 1 (SMD = −0.81, 95% CI −1.21 to −0.42), as well as lower disability score at month 1 (SMD = −1.45, 95% CI −2.68 to −0.22) and at month 3 (SMD = −0.69, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.31). No serious shockwave-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion The use of ESWT in CLBP patients results in significant and quantifiable reductions in pain and disability in the short term. However, further well-conducted RCTs are necessary for building high-quality evidence and promoting the application of ESWT in clinical practice.

Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pillar pain after open carpal tunnel release: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study

BackgroundPillar pain may develop after carpal tunnel release surgery (CTRS). This prospective double-blinded randomized trial investigated the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in pillar pain relief and hand function improvement.MethodsThe sample consisted of 60 patients with post-CTRS pillar pain, randomized into two groups. The ESWT group (experimental) received three sessions of ESWT, while the control group received three sessions of sham ESWT, one session per week. Participants were evaluated before treatment, and three weeks, three months, and six months after treatment. The pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Hand functions were assessed using the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire (MHQ).ResultsThe ESWT group showed significant improvement in VAS and MHQ scores after treatment at all time points compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Before treatment, the ESWT and control groups had a VAS score of 6.8 ± 1.3 and 6.7 ± 1.0, respectively. Three weeks after treatment, they had a VAS score of 2.8 ± 1.1 and 6.1 ± 1.0, respectively. Six months after treatment, the VAS score was reduced to 1.9 ± 0.9 and 5.1 ± 1.0, respectively. The ESWT group had a MHQ score of 54.4 ± 7.7 before treatment and 73.3 ± 6.8 six months after. The control group had a MHQ score of 54.2 ± 7.1 before treatment and 57.8 ± 4.4 six months after.ConclusionsESWT is an effective and a safe non-invasive treatment option for pain management and hand functionality in pillar pain.

Short- and Intermediate-Term Results of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Noninsertional Achilles Tendinopathy.

Earlier randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported only midterm (3-4 months) results of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) as a treatment for noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy (NAT). This study compared the effectiveness of an eccentric loading program followed by stretching exercises combined with ESWT (study group) or sham ESWT (control group) for treating chronic NAT in both the short and long term. This double-blind RCT was conducted between 2018 and 2020. Adult patients with unilateral NAT who failed standard conservative treatment were randomly allocated to either group. Function and pain were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 16 months using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Mixed-design analysis of variance and nonparametric statistics were performed. Twenty-two men and 28 women aged 18 to 40 years were allocated into 2 equally matched groups. Function and pain scores in the study group were not significantly different from control group scores at baseline (VISA-A: 22.2 ± 6.5 vs 21.0 ± 5.2 and VAS: 8 ± 1 vs 8 ± 1, respectively). Both groups significantly improved posttreatment (VISA-A: 85 ± 6.2 vs 53.4 ± 7.7 and VAS: 1 ± 2 vs 7 ± 2, respectively). At the 16-month follow-up, outcome scores declined slightly but significantly in the study group (VISA-A: 80 ± 5.3; VAS: 3 ± 2) and improved in the control group (VISA-A: 67 ± 5.6; VAS: 5 ± 1). However, both groups were significantly better than baseline. At both time points, the study group had significantly superior scores (statistically and clinically) than the control group (P = .0001). Combining calf eccentric loading with stretching exercises resulted in significant improvements in the pain and functional scores in patients with NAT. Adding ESWT to this combined protocol resulted in significantly greater improvements in both the short and long term. Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Combined With Oral Medication and Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo compare extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with oral medication and an exercise program vs sham treatment with medication and exercise for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). DesignRandomized controlled trial. SettingOutpatient clinic at a university hospital. ParticipantsEligibility criteria were age older than 18 years and duration of CLBP exceeding 3 months. Exclusion criteria were concurrent treatment or history of surgery for CLBP, cancer, fractures, infections, and disk degeneration. InterventionThe intervention group received extracorporeal shock wave therapy once a week for 4 weeks along with oral medications and an exercise program. The control group received sham extracorporeal shock wave therapy along with oral medications and an exercise program. Main Outcome MeasuresVisual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess pain and disability at baseline and after 3 months. ResultsThe pain score in the intervention group (N=16) was 6.6 at baseline and 3.0 after 1 month (P<.0001) and 1.8 after 3 months (P<.0001). In the control group (N=16), the pain score was 6.8 at baseline, 4.6 after 1 month (P<.0001), and 1.1 after 3 months (P<.0001). ODI scores decreased significantly in both groups compared with baseline values (first month: P<.001, third month: P<.05). The mean ODI score did not differ significantly between the groups (P=.942). ConclusionExtracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with oral medication and exercise was safe and effective in the short-term treatment of chronic low back pain.

The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Pain Intensity and Neck Disability for Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Neck and Shoulder: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on myofascial pain syndrome in the neck and shoulder compared with that of other treatments. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched until May 30, 2019, to select randomized controlled trials. The randomized controlled trials comparing extracorporeal shock wave therapy with sham extracorporeal shock wave therapy or other treatments for patients with myofascial pain syndrome in the neck and shoulder patients were included. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies. The Cochrane Handbook was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials. Main outcomes associated with pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, and neck disability were selected. The study was registered with PROSPERO (Registration Number CRD 42019137459). A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were finally included. The results indicated that extracorporeal shock wave therapy had a large effect size on improving pain intensity (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.11 to 1.23, P = 0.02) and pressure pain threshold (SMD = 1.19, 95% confidence interval = 0.27 to l2.12, P = 0.01) at postintervention. However, there was no significant effect on neck disability at postintervention (SMD = 0.03, 95% confidence interval = -0.76 to 0.83, P = 0.93). After the subgroup analyses on the type of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy had a significant effect on improving pain intensity (SMD = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.13 to 1.36, P = 0.02) and pressure pain threshold (SMD = 1.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.21 to 3.18, P = 0.03) at postintervention in comparison with that of other treatments. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is superior to other treatments in terms of alleviating the pain intensity and pressure pain threshold of patients with myofascial pain syndrome in the neck and shoulder at postintervention. In particular, focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy shows significant improvement in pain relief. However, radical extracorporeal shock wave therapy for myofascial pain syndrome treatment still remains unclear.

Timing of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in rabbits with carpal tunnel syndrome.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) according to treatment timing in rabbits with 10% dextrose-induced carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); 0.1-ml 10% dextrose solution was injected under ultrasound guidance twice weekly to the left forepaw subsynovial connective tissue (SSCT) within the carpal tunnel of 36 New Zealand white rabbits to induce CTS. The rabbits were randomly allocated into four groups: G1-S (sham ESWT), G2-E4 (ESWT at 4weeks), G3-E8 (at 8weeks), and G4-E16 (at 16weeks). Radial ESWT (500 pulses, 0.08mJ/mm2 , 2Hz) was repeated thrice weekly. Median nerve distal motor latency (DML) was measured before injection and at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20weeks after the first injection. All rabbits were sacrificed 20weeks after injection. The median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) and SSCT thickness were measured with light microscopy. The mean median nerve DML at 4weeks after the first dextrose injection did not differ from that at preinjection in all groups. The mean median nerve DML significantly increased before ESWT in all groups (p<.05); however, it did not increase in G2-E4 and G3-E8 for 12weeks after ESWT and in G4-E16 for 4weeks (p>.05). Mean CSA of the median nerve and mean SSCT thickness in G2-E4 were significantly lower than those in the other groups (p<.05). ESWT may prevent the progression of CTS for 12weeks in rabbits with dextrose-induced CTS regardless of treatment timing, and early application results in superior outcomes.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Pillar Pain after Carpal Tunnel Release: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pillar pain after carpal tunnel release.Materials and Methods:In this prospective randomized controlled trial, forty patients with pillar pain for at least 1 month after carpal tunnel release surgery were randomly assigned in two groups. ESWT group received four sessions of ESWT at weekly intervals, and patients in the control group received sham ESWT treatment at the same intervals, involved sound but no energy. At baseline, 1st month, and 3rd month, hand function (using Brief-Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire) and pain score were assessed and compared between groups.Results:At baseline, pain score and hand function score were similar in both groups. After 1st month, pain score in ESWT and control groups was 3.7 versus 4.7, respectively (P = 0.066), and hand function score was 60.7 versus 52.2, respectively (P = 0.032). After 3 months, pain score in ESWT group was significantly lower than the control group (1.6 versus 3.6, respectively, P < 0.0001), hand function score in ESWT group was significantly better than the control group (75.4 vs. 63.7, respectively, P < 0.0001). Trend of decrease in pain score between groups was significantly different, but trend of increase in hand function score was not significantly different.Conclusion:After ESWT, hand function and pain score in patients with pillar pain improved faster compared to control patients. Hence, ESWT can be used as a safe and effective noninvasive technique in patients with pillar pain after carpal tunnel release.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy with low-energy flux density inhibits hypertrophic scar formation in an animal model.

Hypertrophic scar is characterized by excessive deposits of collagen during skin wound healing, which could become a challenge to clinicians. This study assessed the effects of the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on hyper-trophic scar formation and the underlying gene regulation. A rabbit ear hypertrophic scar model was generated and randomly divided into three groups: L-ESWT group to receive L-ESWT (energy flux density of 0.1 mJ/mm2), H-ESWT (energy flux density of 0.2 mJ/mm2) and sham ESWT group (S-ESWT). Hypertrophic scar tissues were then collected and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's trichrome staining, respectively, to assess scar elevation index (SEI), fibroblast density and collagen fiber arrangement. Expression of cell proliferation marker proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) were assessed using RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in hypertrophic scar tissues. H&E staining sections showed significant reduction of SEI and fibroblast density in both ESWT treatment groups compared to S-ESWT, but there was no dramatic difference between L-ESWT and H-ESWT groups. Masson's trichrome staining showed that collagen fibers were more slender and broader and oriented in parallel to skin surface after administration of ESWT compared to control tissues. At the gene level, PCNA-positive fibroblasts and α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts were significantly decreased after L-ESWT or H-ESWT compared to the controls. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in expression of PCNA mRNA between L-ESWT or H-ESWT and S-ESWT, whereas expression of α-SMA mRNA significantly decreased in L-ESWT compared to that of H-ESWT and S-ESWT (P=0.002 and P=0.030, respectively). In conclusion, L-ESWT could be effective on suppression of hypertrophic scar formation by inhibition of scar elevation index and fibroblast density as well as α-SMA expression in hypertrophic scar tissues of the rabbit model.

Comparision of the effectiveness of ESWT and ultrasound treatments in myofascial pain syndrome: randomized, sham-controlled study.

[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound (US) and sham ESWT in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). [Subjects and Methods] Sixty MPS patients aged 18–60 years were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Group 1 received ESWT for 4 session with 3 day-intervals. Group 2 received 4 sessions of sham ESWT. US was applied to Group 3 for 10 sessions. All patients were recommended an exercise program. The patients were evaluated before-post and 6 weeks after treatment. Measurements were made using pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain score (PS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated by using SF-36 and HADS (hospital anxiety and depression scale). [Results] A significant posttreatment difference was found in VAS, PPT and SF-36 subparameters in group 1. In group 2, a significant difference was not found in any parameter. In group 3, a significant difference was detected in parameters of VAS and PPT. A significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2 as for subtitles of PPT, VAS, SF-36. [Conclusion] These results suggest that ESWT is as effective as US. ESWT and US are significantly more effective than sham ESWT.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy with a modified peppering technique for knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background and objectives: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been shown to promote pain relief and functional improvement in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. We aimed to determine the efficacy of ESWT for knee OA with a modified peppering technique by comparison with sham treatment. Design: A single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Methods: This trial will be performed at Taoyuan General Hospital, Taiwan, China. We will enroll at least 36 patients with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale, grade 2 to grade 4) to receive ESWT or sham ESWT. Using simple randomization patients will be assigned into two groups: ESWT and sham ESWT. In the ESWT group, patients will receive 1600 pulses of shockwave at 0.24 mJ/mm2 weekly for 3 weeks. In the sham ESWT group, patients will receive 1600 pulses of shockwave at 0.24 mJ/mm2 in the same area without jelly between applicator pad and handpiece. Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The secondary outcome measures are Visual analog scale and six-minute walk test. The patients will be evaluated at baseline, 3rd week and 4th week. Discussion: The trial outcomes will investigate the effects of ESWT with a modified peppering technique in patients diagnosed with knee OA. Ethics and dissemination: This study protocol has acquired written approval from Ethics Committee, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, China (IRB No. TYGH105013), and will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki developed by the World Medical Association. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals or disseminated via conference presentations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT03048773; registered on February 9, 2017. Protocol version: 1.0.

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on scar pain in burn patients: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Background:Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been used to reduce pain in patients with various musculoskeletal diseases and wounds. We investigated the effect of ESWT on scar pain after complete wound epithelialization in burn patients.Methods:A prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from February 2014 to 2015. Forty patients with burn scar pain despite standard therapy (medication, physical therapy, and burn rehabilitation massage therapy) were randomized into ESWT or control (sham ESWT) groups. ESWT was administered at 100 impulses/cm2 (0.05–0.15 mJ/mm2) once per week for 3 weeks. The treatment effects were assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), pain threshold, Nirschl pain phase system, and Roles and Maudsley scores.Results:The characteristics of patients between the 2 study groups were balanced (P >0.05) for age, sex, and total burn surface area (%). In both groups, the NRS, pain threshold (Ib/cm2), and Nirschl pain phase system values significantly improved (P <0.05) after 3 sessions of ESWT or sham therapy, and there were significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of these 3 variables (P <0.001, P <0.001, P = 0.013, respectively). The Roles and Maudsley scores significantly improved; among 20 patients, 17 reported a score of poor (85%) and 3 reported fair (15%) before ESWT, whereas 3 reported poor (15%), 8 reported fair (40%), 5 reported good (25%), and 4 reported excellent (20%) after ESWT (P = 0.004). The scores did not improve in the control group (P = 0.128).Conclusion:ESWT significantly reduced scar pain in burn patients after wound recovery.

Effects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain, function, and ultrasonographic features of chronic stroke patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA total of 18 chronic stroke patients (33 knee joints) with unilateral or bilateral knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥1) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly allocated to an experimental group receiving ESWT (n=9) or a control group receiving sham ESWT (n=9). For the ESWT group, patients received 1,000 pulses weekly for 3 weeks, totaling to an energy dose of 0.05 mJ/mm2 on the proximal medial tibia of the affected knee. The assessments were performed before the treatment, immediately after the first treatment, and 1 week after the last treatment using the following: the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; patient perception of the clinical severity of OA; the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (ambulation and chair/bed transfer); the Functional Independence Measure scale (FIM; bed/chair/wheelchair transfer, toilet transfer, walking, and stairs); and ultrasonographic features (articular cartilage thickness, Doppler activity, and joint effusion height).ResultsThe experimental group showed a significant improvement in VAS score (4.50±1.87 to 2.71±1.38) and patient perception of the clinical severity of OA (1.87±0.83 to 2.75±0.46). The bed/chair/wheelchair transfer components of the FIM score also improved significantly (4.12±1.55 to 4.62±1.30). In terms of the ultrasonographic features, increased Doppler activity was observed in the medial knee in the experimental group immediately following ESWT.ConclusionIt is suggested that ESWT may reduce pain and improve function in chronic stroke patients with OA, and may increase vascular activity at the target site.

Therapeutic Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy According to Treatment Session on Gastrocnemius Muscle Spasticity in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study.

ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) according to treatment session on gastrocnemius muscle spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).MethodsTwelve children with spastic CP underwent 1 ESWT and 2 sham ESWT sessions for gastrocnemius (group 1) or 3 ESWT sessions (group 2) once per week for 3 weeks. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score, passive range of motion (PROM) of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles with knee extension, and median red pixel intensity (RPI) of color histogram of medial gastrocnemius on real-time sonoelastography (RTS) were measured before ESWT, immediately after the first and third ESWT, and at 4 weeks after the third ESWT.ResultsMean ankle PROM was significantly increased whereas as mean ankle MAS and median gastrocnemius RPI were significantly decreased in both groups after the first ESWT. Clinical and RTS parameters before ESWT were not significantly different from those immediately after the third ESWT or at 4 weeks after the third ESWT in group 1. However, they were significantly different from those immediately after the third ESWT or at 4 weeks after the third ESWT in group 2. Mean ankle PROM, mean ankle MAS, and median gastrocnemius RPI in group 2 were significantly different from that in group 1 at 4 weeks or immediately after the third ESWT.ConclusionThe therapeutic effect of ESWT on spastic medial gastrocnemius in children with spastic CP is dependent on the number of ESWT sessions.

Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on pain, functional level of the upper extremity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).Methods:This study involved 60 patients with SIS (40 females, 20 males) with a mean age of 52.58 ± 8.05 years. Before the first measurements, all patients were separated into an ESWT group (Group I, n = 30) and a control group (Group II, n = 30) according to a simple random table. Standard physiotherapy and medium-energy ESWT were applied to Group I, and standard physiotherapy and sham ESWT were applied to Group II for 4 weeks. Pain, functional level of the upper extremity and QOL were evaluated before and after treatment.Results:After treatment, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score decreased , and Constant Shoulder Score, Shoulder Pain and Disablity Index (SPADI) and SF-36 score increased statistically in both groups (p < 0.05). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the VAS score, Constant Shoulder Score, and SPADI between Groups I and II after treatment (p > 0.05).Conclusion:The results of our study show that applications of medium-energy ESWT at one session a week for 4 weeks had effects similar to those of standard physiotherapy and sham ESWT on shoulder pain, functional level of the upper extremity, and QOL in patients with SIS.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for non-calcific supraspinatus tendinitis - 10-year follow-up of a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Evidence for the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in supraspinatus tendinopathy without calcification is sparse, and therefore this treatment option is often controversial. Patients of a randomized placebo-controlled study to analyze the effects of ESWT on function and pain were revisited 10 years after the initial consultation. The former verum group received 6000 impulses (energy flux density, 0.11 mJ/mm²) in three sessions after local anesthesia between 1999 and 2000. The placebo group had 6000 impulses of a sham ESWT after local anesthesia in the same period. Re-evaluation of the patients included a relative Constant score as well as pain measurements (visual analogue scale) during activity and at rest. No significant changes (p>0.05) in relative Constant scores, pain at rest, or pain during activity could be found after a 10-year follow-up between the placebo and verum groups after ESWT. The treatment of non-calcific supraspinatus tendinopathy with ESWT does not seem to have an effect on function or pain improvement in the long run. The results of the present study cannot advise the use of ESWT in cases of non-calcific supraspinatus tendinopathy.