N O TES 1 These interviews, held in 1974 and 1976, appeared in Ronald Hayman, Tom Stop pard (London, 1978). 2 David Gollob and David Roper, “Trad Tom Pops In,” Gambit 10 (1981). 3 Tom Stoppard, “Ambushes for the Audience: Towards a High Comedy of Ideas,” Theatre Quarterly 4 (May-July 1974) : 4. Cited by Jenkins, p. 184. 4 Ibid., p. 12. Cited by Jenkins, p. too. 5 Ibid., p. 14. Cited by Jenkins, p. 118. St a n l e y g. m u l l in s / Laurentian University Michael Peterman, Robertson Davies (Boston: Twayne, 1986). 175. $19.95 (u.s.) Robertson Davies has recently emerged as one of Canada’s most important authors. Despite the confines of the Twayne format, Michael Peterman makes a valuable contribution to our critical understanding of the nature of Davies’s vision and his art. This study is more than an introduction to an important writer’s work; it marks an original intervention in the debate about the ethics and ultimate achievement of Davies’s fiction. Peterman argues that Davies’s sustaining theme is “the importance of self in modem life” (ii) and that the “egoism of the hero figure . . . dominates his work” (iii). Such an approach represents the critical consensus about Davies’s writing in Canada. Continuing with the psychological and thematic focus that has dominated Davies criticism to date, Peterman provides a balanced introduction to this aspect of Davies’s writing. He notes that “most of the critics who have quarreled with Fifth Business have at the heart of their complaints a dissatisfaction with egoism as the novel celebrates it” (127). Peterman shares some of this dissatisfaction. He is critical of Davies’s tendency to “romantic hero worship” and to the celebration of an “autocratic worldview” (130). In World of Wonders, Peterman sees this tendency leading Davies to depict “a persistent kind of moral and aesthetic bullying by dominant and domineering figures whose credentials are their successes in the undemocratic world of art and theater” (149). Although he never accuses Davies himself of similarly bullying his readers, one could logi cally draw that inference from Peterman’s reading of these texts. He sees Davies the author as the true subject of the Salterton novels. He believes that, in The Manticore and The Rebel Angels, the very strength of Davies’s per sonal voice creates problems in differentiating among his characters’ narrative voices. Finally, Peterman acknowledges that the “ essentially religious and moral” commitment to self that he argues is at the heart of Davies’s work is 16 also “selfish, undemocratic, and elitist” (159). These characteristics seem all the more disturbing to Peterman in that they do not bother Davies himself in the least. Peterman’s consistent elaboration of his thesis enables new insight into the continuities of Davies’s work. It allows him to see Eisengrim as “an extraordi nary reincarnation of Samuel Marchbanks” (152). It alerts him to the con tinuity of the Prospero figure, the didactic, manipulative, dogmatic teacher, as a recurrently privileged type in Davies’s fiction. It leads him to note the similarities between the final volumes of the Salterton and Deptford trilogies, both of which focus on the “sustaining selfhood” of the artist (147). His argument also leads to clear differences between his readings and those of other Davies scholars. It causes him to modify Patricia Monk’s Jungian emphasis on Marchbanks as Davies’s “shadow self” to argue instead that Davies “was in complete control of the energy of his mouthpiece, of what both he and his mouthpiece chose to reveal” (33). Peterman’s reading of Marchbanks restores the satiric wit to the dark energies highlighted by Monk, and it places Davies the conscious artist clearly to the fore. In his emphasis on the monologic nature of Davies’s fiction, Peterman also implicitly sets himself in opposition to Barbara Godard’s’ attempts to claim that Davies’s writing exemplifies the Bakhtinian dialogic imagination of the camivalesque. Peter man’s stress on the conservative form and didactic manner of Davies’s fiction remains persuasive. Indeed, Peterman is most convincing when he points out the thematic and stylistic implications of Davies’s undoubted emphasis on the...
Read full abstract