Sexual Orientation Groups Research Articles

An evaluation of measurement invariance of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition borderline personality disorder criteria across heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults.

There is a robust, yet poorly understood relationship between nonheterosexual orientation and borderline personality disorder (BPD), with lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals evidencing greater BPD symptoms compared to heterosexual individuals. Recent evidence suggests possible psychometric bias in BPD diagnostic criteria leading to greater endorsement among sexual minority individuals, which hinders researchers' ability to make valid group comparisons. The present study utilized an epidemiological sample of 35,995 men and women to evaluate the extent of differential item functioning (DIF) among BPD criteria across sexual orientation groups using a multiple indicators multiple causes approach. All criteria except affective instability and emptiness indicated DIF for at least one sexual minority focal group, although both demonstrated DIF in sensitivity analyses. DIF was most consistently indicated for suicidality, efforts to avoid abandonment, and impulsivity. Contrary to predictions, DIF was mostly nonuniform with greater item discrimination for sexual minority groups compared to their heterosexual counterparts. Finally, all estimated effect sizes were small, suggesting that DIF was not practically meaningful and unlikely to impact the validity of group comparisons for BPD criteria across heterosexual and nonheterosexual men and women. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Investigating What Factors Influence Users’ Rating of Harmful Algorithmic Bias and Discrimination

There has been growing recognition of the crucial role users, especially those from marginalized groups, play in uncovering harmful algorithmic biases. However, it remains unclear how users’ identities and experiences might impact their rating of harmful biases. We present an online experiment (N=2,197) examining these factors: demographics, discrimination experiences, and social and technical knowledge. Participants were shown examples of image search results, including ones that previous literature has identified as biased against marginalized racial, gender, or sexual orientation groups. We found participants from marginalized gender or sexual orientation groups were more likely to rate the examples as more severely harmful. Belonging to marginalized races did not have a similar pattern. Additional factors affecting users’ ratings included discrimination experiences, and having friends or family belonging to marginalized demographics. A qualitative analysis offers insights into users' bias recognition, and why they see biases the way they do. We provide guidance for designing future methods to support effective user-driven auditing.

Abstract A126: Cancer screening trends in Louisiana’s sexual gender minority population

Abstract Cancer screenings in Louisiana (LA) have been consistently lower than the national average. Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) are more likely to be non-compliant with cancer screening guidelines and consistently do not meet cancer screening recommendations. This study compares compliance to cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines over time between SGM and the non-SGM population in LA. Data were obtained from the LA 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The sample was divided into gay (including lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other sexual orientation other than straight) and straight. Three primary outcomes of interest were used to measure breast, cervical, and CRC cancer screening adherence based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening recommendation at the time of each survey. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were conducted using sample weights. CRC had the lowest compliance rate in the entire population and across sexual orientation groups. Twenty-five percent of both populations had never received any CRC screening test. Comparatively, 3.6% of straight and 5.3% of gay populations had never received a mammogram while 6.6% of straight and 13.6% of the population had never received a pap smear. Significant improvements in compliance to breast, cervical, and CRC cancer screenings guidelines was observed among those who identified as straight over the survey years until 2020. Decreases in screening compliance were observed in this population from 2020 to 2022, likely due to the effects of the COVID pandemic. Screening compliance in those who identified as gay showed more variation over time in all three cancers. Screening compliance for CRC and cervical cancer were at its highest in 2016, declined to its lowest point in 2020, but increased in 2022. In 2016, there was a significant decline in breast cancer screening compliance in this population to the lowest ever observed in both groups. The initial increases in colorectal and cervical cancer screening observed from 2014 to 2016 among the gay population may be attributed to significant decreases in uninsured rates following the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Additionally, this population saw increased access to the private insurance market following the Obergefell decision and the Marriage Equality Act of 2015, which extended employer-sponsored coverage to same-sex couples. While breast cancer screenings declined from 2014-2016 in the gay population, there was a sharp increase from 2016 to 2018, which aligns with the 2016 expansion of Medicaid in Louisiana. Despite increases in access to insurance coverage, SGM individuals report being in fair or poor health and having negative experiences with healthcare providers at higher rates than their non-SGM counterparts. More research is needed to understand the healthcare landscape and experiences of SGM Louisianans. This will help to inform targeted interventions to increase screenings and improve cancer outcomes among this population. Citation Format: Bilikisu Elewonibi, Carleigh Baudoin, Ashely Fenton. Cancer screening trends in Louisiana’s sexual gender minority population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A126.

Social cure model: testing the link between identity centrality and body appreciation in diverse sexual orientation and gender identity groups

BackgroundThe level of experienced sociocultural pressure to have an idealized body can vary depending on a person’s gender identity and sexual orientation. The current study explored whether differences in levels of body appreciation among people with different sexual orientations and gender identities vary because of differing levels of experienced pressure by in-group members and varying levels of experienced hostile behaviors because of their looks or body. Thereby, the study tests the social cure model, according to which high levels of identity centrality are associated with better mental health.MethodsAn online cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted with 1,587 people (51.3% cisgender women, 39.3% cisgender men, 9.5% non-binary; 52.9% identified as heterosexual, 27.7% identified as bisexual/pansexual, 11.2% identified as gay/lesbian, 8.2% identified as asexual/demi/queer; Mage = 32.9, SD = 12.6) from German-speaking countries. Variables were assessed with German-language versions of the Multidimensional and Multicomponent Measure of Social Identification, Body Appreciation Scale-2, the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire, and the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4, revised. A manifest-path model was calculated.ResultsNon-binary persons reported lower levels of body appreciation than did cisgender men and sexual minority persons reported lower levels of body appreciation than did heterosexual persons. Furthermore, sexual minority persons experienced more hostile behaviors directed towards them because of their looks or body than did heterosexual persons. Similarly, non-binary persons experienced more hostile behaviors than did men. Non-binary persons were subjected to lower levels of in-group pressure than were men. Gay/lesbian persons and asexual persons were subjected to lower levels of in-group pressure than were heterosexual persons. More hostile behaviors and stronger in-group pressure were related to lower body appreciation. In cisgender women and men indirect links revealed associations between strong identity centrality and low levels of body appreciation through the mediator of high in-group pressure.ConclusionsData in sexual minority individuals or non-binary persons supported the social cure model, according to which persons can find support and validation for their looks and body from in-group members. In cisgender women and men, strong identification as a woman or man can be related to stronger in-group pressure and in turn to lower body appreciation.

Associations Between Opioid and Kratom Use in the USA: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation.

Kratom is federally unregulated and is marketed as an opioid alternative despite limited evidence and known negative effects. Disparities in associations between opioid and kratom use may be partly attributed to race/ethnicity and sexual orientation given differences in marketing, use motives, and prescriber practices. Data: 2021 nationally representative National Survey on Drug Use and Health among individuals aged 18 + . We used weighted logistic regression analyses to assess race/ethnicity and sexual orientation as moderators of associations between past-year opioid (1) use (total sample, n = 44,877) and (2) misuse and use disorder (among those with past-year opioid use, n = 10,398) and the outcome of kratom use (lifetime, past year). 26.76% reported past-year opioid use, and among those, 12.20% and 7.54% reported past-year opioid misuse and use disorder, respectively; 1.72% and 0.67% had lifetime and past-year kratom use, respectively. Opioid use was positively associated with lifetime (aOR = 2.69, 95%CI = 1.98, 3.66) and past-year (aOR = 3.84, 95%CI = 2.50, 5.92) kratom use; associations among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic White) participants were weaker (p < 0.01). Among participants reporting past-year opioid use, misuse and use disorder were positively associated with lifetime (aORmisuse = 2.46, 95%CI = 1.60, 3.78; aORuse disorder = 5.58, 95%CI = 2.82, 11.04) and past-year (aORmisuse = 2.40, 95%CI = 1.26, 4.59; aORuse disorder = 3.08, 95%CI = 1.48, 6.41) kratom use; among bisexual (vs. heterosexual) participants, opioid use disorder was associated with a lower probability of lifetime kratom use (p < 0.01). We observed positive associations between opioid and kratom use, with potential disparities among certain racial/ethnic and sexual orientation groups. Research should examine the mechanisms contributing to these differences to inform prevention and intervention efforts.

What do you believe? Differentiating obsessive beliefs between bi+, gay/lesbian and heterosexual adults with OCD

Sexual minority (e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual) people are 9 times more likely than heterosexual people to be diagnosed with OCD. Cognitive models of OCD posit that obsessive beliefs drive clinical OCD symptoms, however, obsessive beliefs have yet to be examined based on sexual orientation. Due to prior research identifying that sexual minority people are more likely to be diagnosed or treated for OCD and present with unique symptom profiles, elucidating underlying beliefs may partially explain why these disparities persist. Participants (N = 505) completed the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) upon admission to a partial hospital/residential treatment program for OCD. The three largest sexual orientation groups were bisexual/pansexual (n = 46), gay/lesbian (n = 34), and heterosexual (n = 425). To examine differences, the OBQ-44's subdomains (perfectionism/certainty, responsibility for harm/threat, and importance/control of thoughts) were compared by sexual orientation. Results highlighted that perfectionism/certainty and harm/threat were significantly higher for bi+ compared to heterosexual participants, but not compared to gay/lesbian people, or between heterosexual and gay/lesbian people. This paper adds to a growing body of literature suggesting that the experience of bi+ individuals is different, and future research should identify the role of bi+ discrimination in the development of these core beliefs.

Does the Paraphilia Scale Work for Everyone? Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Sexual Orientation Groups

ABSTRACT We conducted three studies to examine the factor structure and measurement invariance of the Paraphilia Scale, a measure of paraphilic interests used in multiple studies. In the first study, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) testing different a priori models with a community sample of 1,040 adults previously reported by Seto et al. (2021), and found support for a hierarchical four-factor model: An agonistic continuum involving coercion or physical pain (biastophilia, sexual sadism, masochism), chronophilias (pedophilia, hebephilia), courtship disorders (voyeurism, exhibitionism, and frotteurism), and fetishism (object fetishism, transvestic fetishism, urophilia-coprophilia). This factor structure was replicated in a second study comprising a combined sample of 400 mTurk participants and 870 university students. The third study analyzed the community sample and found evidence of configural invariance but not scalar or metric invariance across gender (man or woman) and sexual orientation for gender (heterosexual or other sexual orientation). This indicates that the factor structure of the Paraphilia Scale is robust for gender and sexual orientation for gender, but factor loadings differ across these groups, as do the loadings of individual items on the four factors. Implications for research on gender and sexual orientation differences in paraphilic interests are discussed.

Symptom Profiles and Intensive Treatment Outcomes in Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Patients With OCD

Sexual minority (SM) individuals appear to be at greater risk for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Despite this, little is known about OCD presentation and treatment outcomes among SM individuals. Although some research has suggested that SM individuals may be more likely to endorse intrusive thoughts related to violence/sex/religion compared to heterosexual individuals, extant literature has neglected to examine potential differences across different SM groups, a notable limitation given the apparent differences in the types of minority stress that each group experiences and the unique health disparities affecting each group. The current study sought to address these gaps by examining potential differences in OCD symptom severity, presentation, and treatment outcomes using analysis of variance and profile analysis in a clinical sample of 1,502 cisgender patients diagnosed with OCD enrolled in intensive OCD treatment (87.5% heterosexual, 6.6% bisexual, 4.7% lesbian or gay, and 1.1% questioning). Replicating previous research, neither OCD severity nor treatment outcomes differed by sexual orientation, and findings extended previous research that no differences across SM groups were observed, either. However, contrary to previous research, there was also no evidence for unique profiles of OCD symptoms across sexual orientation groups, and questioning individuals reported significantly less severe symmetry symptoms compared to heterosexual and bisexual individuals. Findings are encouraging in that they suggest that cisgender bisexual, lesbian or gay, and questioning individuals with OCD can still benefit significantly and to the same degree as their cisgender heterosexual peers in intensive OCD treatment. Potential explanations for conflicting findings regarding symptom profiles are discussed.

Functional lateralization in social-emotional processing: The influence of sexual orientation and gender identity on cradling preferences

The left-cradling bias (i.e., the motor asymmetry for cradling infants on the left side) has often been associated to the right-hemispheric social-emotional specialization, and it has often been reported to be stronger in females than in males. In this study we explored the effects of sexual orientation and gender identity on this lateral bias by means of a web-based investigation in a sample of adults (485 biological females and 196 biological males) recruited through LGBTQIA+ networks and general university forums. We exploited a cradling imagery task to assess participants' cradling-side preference, and standardized questionnaires to assess participants' homosexuality (Klein Sexual Orientation Grid) and gender nonconformity (Gender Identity/Gender Dysphoria Questionnaire for Adults and Adolescents). Results confirmed the expected left-cradling bias across all sexual orientation groups except for heterosexual males. Importantly, higher homosexuality scores were associated with higher proportions of left cradling in males. These results suggest that sexual orientation can influence cradling preference in males, indicating a complex interaction between biological and psychological factors in the laterality of social-emotional processing. Finally, the left-cradling bias seems to confirm its role as a behavioral proxy of social-emotional functional lateralization in humans.

Disparities in cancer incidence by sexual orientation.

Cancer risk factors are more common among sexual minority populations (e.g., lesbian, bisexual) than their heterosexual peers, yet little is known about cancer incidence across sexual orientation groups. The 1989-2017 data from the Nurses' Health Study II, a longitudinal cohort of female nurses across the United States, were analyzed (N=101,543). Sexual orientation-related cancer disparities were quantified by comparing any cancer incidence among four sexual minority groups based on self-disclosure-(1) heterosexual with past same-sex attractions/partners/identity; (2) mostly heterosexual; (3) bisexual; and (4) lesbian women-to completely heterosexual women using age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR)calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method. Additionally, subanalyses at 21 cancer disease sites (e.g., breast, colon/rectum) were conducted. For all-cancer analyses, there were no statistically significant differences in cancer incidence at the 5% type I error cutoff among sexual minority groups when compared to completely heterosexual women; the aIRR was 1.17 (95% CI,0.99-1.38) among lesbian women and 0.80 (0.58-1.10) among bisexual women. For the site-specific analyses, incidences at multiple sites were significantly higher among lesbian women compared to completely heterosexual women: thyroid cancer (aIRR, 1.87 [1.03-3.41]), basal cell carcinoma (aIRR,1.85 [1.09-3.14]), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aIRR,2.13 [1.10-4.12]). Lesbian women may be disproportionately burdened by cancer relative to their heterosexual peers. Sexual minority populations must be explicitly included in cancer prevention efforts. Comprehensive and standardized sexual orientation data must be systematically collected so nuanced sexual orientation-related cancer disparities can be accurately assessed for both common and rare cancers.

LGBTQ+ Homeownership in the United States

LGBTQ+ adults had a lower homeownership rate (53 percent) than non-LGBTQ+ adults (72.5 percent). Looking at LGBTQ+ subgroups by sexual orientation and gender identity revealed important nuances. Transgender people and bisexual people had the lowest homeownership rates. Lesbian cis women had a higher rate of homeownership than gay cis men, whereas in other sexual orientation groups cis men had higher rates than cis women. Transgender people of all sexual orientations, except straight, were between 6 and 12 percentage points less likely to own a home than straight cis men, and lesbian cis women were 4 percentage points less likely.

Measurement invariance of the LGBT People of Color Microaggressions Scale among LGBTQ+ youth.

The LGBT People of Color Microaggressions Scale (LGBT-PCMS) is a widely used measure of intersectional microaggression experiences among sexual and gender minority people of color. Although it is widely used-and increasingly used in adolescent and young adult samples-it is unknown whether the LGBT-PCMS demonstrates similar measurement properties across subgroups of sexual and gender minority youth of color (SGMYOC). Among 4142 SGMYOC (ages 13-17) we found evidence for either partial or full scalar invariance (item loadings and intercepts were generally equal) across sexual orientation, race-ethnicity, and gender identity groups for all three subscales. Specific patterns of invariance and noninvariance across groups, as well as implications for the use of the LGBT-PCMS and its subscales among SGMYOC are discussed.

Childhood Adversity and Adolescent Smartphone Use Across Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression

Nonheterosexual and gender-nonconforming (GNC) individuals tend to report adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) more frequently compared with heterosexual and gender-conforming individuals, and individuals who have experienced ACEs, identify as nonheterosexual, or exhibit moderate to high levels of GNC are more prone to engaging in problematic smartphone use (PSU). However, there is limited school-based data among adolescents regarding this matter. To explore the associations between ACEs and PSU among adolescents across different sexual orientation and gender expression groups. Using data from the 2021 School-Based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey, this cross-sectional study includes participants from 288 public high schools across 8 provinces in China. Statistical analysis was performed from October 2023 to February 2024. Data on ACEs, sexual orientations, and gender expressions (high, moderate, and low GNC) were collected. PSU was assessed using the 10-item Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV). Weighted linear, logistic, or Poisson regression models were used. Among the 85 064 adolescents included (mean [SD] age, 14.92 [1.77] years), 42 632 (50.1%) were female, 70 157 (83.2%) identified as Han Chinese, and 14 208 (16.8) identified as other ethnicities (Miao, Hui, Yi, Dai, and other ethnic groups). The prevalence of PSU among participants was 35.4%. Weighted Poisson regression models indicated that the interaction between GNC and ACE was significant (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99). Further stratified analysis demonstrated homosexual adolescents who experienced 4 or more ACEs showed a significantly increased prevalence of PSU (APR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.64-1.96). Similarly, a markedly higher prevalence of PSU was observed among bisexual individuals with 4 or more ACEs (APR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.41-1.80). Regarding gender expression categories, a significantly higher prevalence of PSU was noted among high GNC adolescents with 4 or more ACEs (APR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.60-1.98) compared with low GNC adolescents without ACEs. Furthermore, experiencing any 3 ACE categories (abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction) was associated with an increased prevalence of PSU across different sexual orientation and gender expression subgroups. In this cross-sectional study, the amalgamation of elevated ACE scores with nonheterosexual orientations or GNC identities was significantly associated with increased PSU prevalence. These findings underscore that preventing ACEs may be beneficial in mitigating PSU among adolescents, particularly for nonheterosexual adolescents and those with high levels of GNC.

Clinical outcomes for sexual and gender minority adolescents in a dialectical behaviour therapy programme.

Sexuality and gender minoritised (SGM) adolescents are at increased risk of self-injury and suicide, and experience barriers to accessing mental health support. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is an effective treatment for self-injury and emotion dysregulation in adolescent populations, but few studies have published outcomes of DBT for SGM young people. This study aimed to investigate treatment outcomes and completion for SGM adolescents and their cisgender and heterosexual peers, in the National & Specialist CAMHS, DBT service (UK). Treatment completion, and opting out before and during treatment were examined for sexual and gender identity groups, as well as changes by the end of treatment in emotion dysregulation, self-injury, in-patient bed-days, emergency department attendances, and borderline personality disorder, depression and anxiety symptoms. SGM adolescents were over-represented in this service, even after considering their increased risk for self-injury. No statistically significant differences were found for treatment completion between the sexual orientation and gender identity groups, although there were patterns indicating possible lower treatment uptake and completion that warrant further investigation. Clinical outcomes for treatment-completers showed improvement by the end of DBT for each group, with few exceptions. These results are from relatively small subsamples, and it was not possible to separate by sex assigned at birth. Findings should be treated tentatively and as early indications of effect sizes to inform future studies. This study suggests that DBT could be a useful treatment for SGM adolescents in a highly specialist treatment setting.

The short version of the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3): Measurement invariance across countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations

BackgroundThe three-item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3) has been frequently used to assess distress related to sexuality in public health surveys and research on sexual wellbeing. However, its psychometric properties and measurement invariance across cultural, gender and sexual subgroups have not yet been examined. This multinational study aimed to validate the SDS-3 and test its psychometric properties, including measurement invariance across language, country, gender identity, and sexual orientation groups. MethodsWe used global survey data from 82,243 individuals (Mean age=32.39 years; 40.3 % men, 57.0 % women, 2.8 % non-binary, and 0.6 % other genders) participating in the International Sexual Survey (ISS; https://internationalsexsurvey.org/) across 42 countries and 26 languages. Participants completed the SDS-3, as well as questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics, including gender identity and sexual orientation. ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a unidimensional factor structure for the SDS-3, and multi-group CFA (MGCFA) suggested that this factor structure was invariant across countries, languages, gender identities, and sexual orientations. Cronbach's α for the unidimensional score was 0.83 (range between 0.76 and 0.89), and McDonald's ω was 0.84 (range between 0.76 and 0.90). Participants who did not experience sexual problems had significantly lower SDS-3 total scores (M = 2.99; SD=2.54) compared to those who reported sexual problems (M = 5.60; SD=3.00), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.01 [95 % CI=-1.03, -0.98]; p < 0.001). ConclusionThe SDS-3 has a unidimensional factor structure and appears to be valid and reliable for measuring sexual distress among individuals from different countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations.

What Are the Economic Arguments for Mandating LGBT+ Health Training for Healthcare Providers? An Economic Evaluation of the Impacts of LGBT+ Health Training on Cervical Screening.

Background: Equitable access to healthcare is a priority of many healthcare systems, aiming to ensure access is driven by need and not minority groups such as those defined by sexual orientation. However, there are healthcare areas where inequity in access across sexual orientation groups is found that are not justified based on need. Mandated LGBTQ+-specific training of the healthcare workforce may help address some barriers of access for these groups. The study aims to understand the potential economic implications for mandated LGBTQ+-specific healthcare training on the healthcare system in England, UK to inform commissioning of training provision. Methods: Cervical cancer screening was used as an exemplar case where there appears to be inequity in access for different sexual orientation groups. A decision model was developed and analysed that considered the impacts of greater uptake of screening for lesbian and bisexual women due to LGBTQ+ training. Costs took the perspective of the healthcare system and outcomes modelled were cancer cases averted in a timeframe of 5 years. Results: Based on cervical cancer screening alone, where training costs are fully attributed to this service, training would likely result in fewer cancer cases detected in the lesbian and bisexual populations, though this comes at a modest increase in healthcare sector costs, with this increase largely reflecting a greater volume of screens. Training costs do not appear to be a major component of the cost implications. Conclusions: In resource-constrained systems with increasing pressures for efficiency savings, the opportunity cost of delivering training is a realistic component of the commissioning decision. The findings in this paper provide a signal that mandated LGBTQ+ training in healthcare could lead to potentially greater outcomes and in breaking down barriers of access and could also enable the healthcare system to provide more equitable access to healthcare.

A theory-based assessment of mpox: Findings from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults.

The purpose of this research was to examine individual differences related to fear of, perceived susceptibility to, and perceived severity of mpox as well as mpox knowledge, fear, perceived susceptibility, and perceived severity as predictors of vaccine intention in a national survey of U.S. adults (aged ≥18 years). Address-based sampling (ABS) methods were used to ensure full coverage of all households in the nation, reflecting the 2021 March Supplement of the Current Population Survey. Internet-based surveys were self-administered by Ipsos between September 16-26, 2022. N = 1018 participants completed the survey. The survey included items, based partially on the Health Belief Model, assessing vaccine intention (1 item; responses from 1 [Definitely not] to 5 [Definitely]), fear of mpox (7-item scale; α = .89; theoretical mean = 7-35), perceived susceptibility to mpox (3-item scale; α = .85; theoretical mean = 3-15), and perceived severity of mpox (4-item scale; α = .65; theoretical mean = 4-20). Higher scores indicate greater fear, susceptibility, and severity. One-way ANOVAs were run to examine mean score differences by demographic groups (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation), and multiple regression analyses assessed the relationship between predictors (mpox knowledge, susceptibility/severity, fear) and a single outcome (vaccination intention), while controlling for demographic covariates. Sampling weights were applied to all analyses. Only 1.8% (n = 18) of respondents reported having received the mpox vaccine. While mpox vaccine intention was low (M = 2.09, SD = 0.99), overall differences between racial/ethnic, sexual orientation, education, and household income groups were statistically significant. Fear of mpox was very low (M = 13.13, SD = 5.33), and there were overall statistically significant differences in both fear and perceived severity among gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, education, and household income groups. While respondents reported not feeling very susceptible to mpox (M = 5.77, SD = 2.50), they generally rated mpox as just above the theoretical mean in terms of severity (M = 11.01, SD = 2.85). Mpox knowledge, fear, severity, and susceptibility, as well as race/ethnicity, were all statistically significant predictors of intention to vaccinate, with susceptibility representing the strongest predictor. Overall, Americans' vaccination for mpox/vaccine intent was low. Gay/lesbian and racial/ethnic minority respondents felt more susceptible to and viewed mpox more severely, compared with heterosexual and White respondents, respectively. These data may be used to tailor risk and prevention (e.g., vaccination) interventions, as cases continue to surge in the current global mpox outbreak. Greater perceptions of susceptibility, severity, and fear about mpox exist largely among minority populations. While public health messaging to promote mpox vaccination can focus on improving knowledge, as well as addressing fear and perceived severity of, and susceptibility to, mpox, such messages should be carefully crafted to prevent disproportionate negative effects on marginalized communities.

Social participation of the older sexual minority population: CLSA data

ABSTRACT Despite the growing ageing population in Canada, limited efforts have been made to understand the role of ageing in sexual minority research. The term sexual minority refers to people that do not identify as heterosexual regarding their sexual orientation. In order to examine the role of social factors in sexual minority ageing, the study utilised the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) baseline data to compare social participation rates between different sexual orientation groups by using the analysis of variance. Findings from the study indicate that social participation levels differ by sexual orientation in both ageing males and females. The results of this study suggest that social participation is an important construct for studies that explore the ageing process of sexual minority populations. In particular, this study’s results related to the lack of social participation in venues such as sports and religious activities points to potential areas of exploration for developing strategies to foster more inclusive environments in order to increase social engagements.

(033) Differences in Sexual Satisfaction by Gender and Sexual Orientation

Abstract Introduction Sexual satisfaction is an important contributor to quality of life. While it has been documented that cisgender men tend to experience greater sexual satisfaction than cisgender women, there is limited research into the nuanced factors that contribute to sexual satisfaction, such as self- versus partner-centered focuses, and differences that exist between sexual orientation groups. Objective The aim of this study is to assess for differences in sexual satisfaction that exist between cisgender men (CM) versus cisgender women (CW) and between sexual orientation subgroups using a validated sexual satisfaction survey. Methods An anonymous, online questionnaire was administered via Qualtrics as part of a larger study on sexual function and pleasure sensation. In addition to providing demographic information, respondents completed the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale (NSSS)- a validated 20-item psychometric scale that assesses sexual satisfaction in the past 6-months across two 10-item subscales: the ego-centered subscale and the partner/sexual activity-centered subscale. Each respondent’s 5-point Likert scale for their NSSS was summated across all 20-items (range: 20-100), with higher sum totals indicating greater reported sexual satisfaction. Statistical analyses were completed via Qualtrics Stats iQ software utilizing ANOVA and chi-square tests, with p&amp;lt;0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results A total of 305 CM and 288 CW were recruited through Qualtrics and completed the NSSS. (Table 1) CM were significantly more likely to report greater total sexual satisfaction than CW, with mean ± SD NSSS scores (out of 100) of 74.5 ± 16.7 and 68.5 ± 19.7, respectively (p&amp;lt;0.0001). With respect to individual measures of the NSSS, CM were significantly more likely to report satisfaction across 14/20 measures (all p&amp;lt;0.05): “My focus/concentration during sexual activity;” “My emotional opening up during sex;” “The frequency of my orgasms;” “The quality of my orgasms;” “My ability to let go and focus on my own pleasure during sex;” “The balance between what I give and receive in sex;” “ “My mood after sexual activity;” “The intensity of my sexual arousal;” “My body’s ability to perform sexually in a satisfactory way;” “The variety of my sexual activities;” “The way I sexually react to my partner;” “My partner’s emotional availability during sex;” “The pleasure I provide my partner;” and “My partner’s ability to satisfy my sexual needs”. There was no statistically significant difference in total NSSS score between sexual orientation groups of CM and CW (p&amp;gt;0.05). (Figure 1). Conclusions CM reported significantly greater sexual satisfaction than CW. Notably, CM reported greater satisfaction in 10/10 ego-centered subscale measures relating to their personal pleasure and 4/10 partner/activity-centered subscale measures relating to their perception of their partner during sex. On the otherhand, there was no significant difference in sexual satisfaction between sexual orientation groups. These findings highlight the nuanced differences that exist within the spheres of personal sexual pleasure, with CM experiencing greater ego-centered pleasure. These findings highlight how a variety of self- and partner-centered nuances ultimately contribute to differences in overall sexual pleasure between CM and CW. Disclosure No.

An Analysis of Tobacco and Marijuana Use by Middle School and High School Bisexual and Homosexual Students Surveyed by the National Youth Tobacco Survey From 2020 to 2022.

This study aimed to analyze tobacco and marijuana use by middle and high school students identifying as bisexual, gay, lesbian, or heterosexual using data from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) spanning from 2020 to 2022. By comparing substance use patterns among different sexual orientation groups, the study sought to identify disparities and potential socioeconomic factors influencing these behaviors. Data from the 2020 to 2022 NYTS were analyzed, focusing on responses regarding ever use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and marijuana by students of varying sexual orientations. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were employed to analyze differences in substance use and socioeconomic indicators between sexual orientation groups. Of the 37 541 students included in the analysis, significant differences in substance use were observed among bisexual, gay, lesbian, and heterosexual students. Bisexual and gay/lesbian students exhibited higher rates of ever use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and marijuana compared to heterosexual students. In addition, socioeconomic differences, such as lower rates of family vehicle ownership and reduced access to vacations, were noted among bisexual and gay/lesbian students. The findings underscore significant differences in tobacco and marijuana use by adolescents based on sexual orientation, mirroring differences observed in LGBTQ adults. These results highlight the importance of targeted interventions, educational initiatives, and support systems tailored to the unique needs of LGBTQ youth. Addressing socioeconomic disparities and fostering inclusive environments are crucial steps in promoting the health and well-being of LGBTQ adolescents. Continued research and collaborative efforts are essential in mitigating health disparities and creating equitable environments for all adolescents.