Severity Of Spinal Stenosis Research Articles

The role of muscle degeneration and spinal balance in the pathophysiology of lumbar spinal stenosis: Study protocol of a translational approach combining in vivo biomechanical experiments with clinical and radiological parameters.

To describe a study protocol for investigating the functional association between posture, spinal balance, ambulatory biomechanics, paraspinal muscle fatigue, paraspinal muscle quality and symptoms in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (sLSS) before and 1-year after elective surgical intervention. Single-centre prospective, experimental, multimodal (clinical, biomechanical, radiological) study with three instances of data collection: baseline (study visit 1), 6-month follow-up (remote) and 1-year follow-up (study visit 2). Both study visits include an in vivo experiment aiming to elicit paraspinal muscle fatigue for postural assessment in a non-fatigued and fatigued state. At baseline and 1-year follow-up, 122 patients with sLSS will be assessed clinically, perform the back-performance scale assessment and complete several patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) questionnaires regarding overall health, disease-related symptoms and kinesiophobia. Posture and biomechanical parameters (joint kinematics, kinetics, surface electromyography, back curvature) will be recorded using an optoelectronic system and retroreflective markers during different tasks including overground walking and movement assessments before and after a modified Biering-Sørensen test, used to elicit paraspinal muscle fatigue. Measurements of muscle size and quality and the severity of spinal stenosis will be obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sagittal postural alignment data from EOS radiographies. After each study visit, physical activity level will be assessed during 9 days using a wrist-worn activity monitor. In addition, physical activity level and PROMs will be assessed remotely at 6-month follow-up. The multimodal set of data obtained using the study protocol described in this paper will help to expand our current knowledge on the pathophysiology, biomechanics, and treatment outcome of degenerative sLSS. The results of this study may contribute to defining and/or altering patient treatment norms, surgery indication criteria and post-surgery rehabilitation schedules. The protocol was approved by the regional ethics committee and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05523388).

Endplate defects, not the severity of spinal stenosis, contribute to low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTIt is controversial whether lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) itself contributes to low back pain (LBP). Lower truncal skeletal muscle mass, spinopelvic malalignment, intervertebral disc degeneration, and endplate abnormalities are thought to be related to LBP. However, whether these factors cause LBP in patients with LSS is unclear. PURPOSETo identify factors associated with LBP in patients with LSS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGCross-sectional design. PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 260 patients (119 men and 141 women, average age 72.8 years) with neurogenic claudication caused by LSS, as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OUTCOME MEASURESRatings of LBP, buttock and leg pain, and numbness on a numerical rating scale (NRS), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scores, muscle mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and radiographic measurements including slippage and lumbopelvic alignment. The severity of LSS, endplate defects, Modic endplate changes, intervertebral disc degeneration, and facet joint osteoarthritis were assessed on MRI. METHODSThe presence of LBP was defined as an NRS score ≥3. The demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, and radiological and MRI findings were compared between patients with and without LBP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors that were independently associated with the presence of LBP. RESULTSThere were significant differences between patients with and without LBP for buttock and leg pain and numbness on the NRS, general health on the SF-36, presence of endplate defects, presence of Modic changes, disc degeneration grading, and disc height grading (all p < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between LBP and diabetes (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.07–5.53), buttock and leg numbness on the NRS (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.17–1.52), general health on the SF-36 (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.95–0.99), and the presence of erosive endplate defects (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.51–6.11) (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONSThese results suggest that LBP in patients with LSS should be carefully assessed not only for spinal stenosis but also clinical factors and endplate defects.

Correlation between severity of spinal stenosis and multifidus atrophy in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

BackgroundDegenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is a common degenerative condition in older adults. Muscle atrophy (MA) is a leading cause of muscle weakness and disability commonly reported in individuals with spinal stenosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the MA correlates with the grade of spinal stenosis in patients with DLSS.MethodsA retrospective analysis on 48 male and 184 female DLSS patients aged around 54.04 years (54.04 ± 8.93) were involved and divided into 6 groups according to claudication-distance-based grading of spinal stenosis, which confirmed by two independent orthopedic surgeons using T2- weighted images. Using 1.5T MRI scanner, the severity of MA is assessed based on its negative correlation with the ratio of total fat-free multifidus muscle cross-sectional area (TFCSA) to total multifidus muscle cross-sectional area (TCSA). Adobe Photoshop CS6 was used for qualitative image analysis and calculate the TFCSA/TCSA ratio to assess the severity of MA, compare the grade of MA with the spinal stenosis segment, stenosis grade and symptom side.ResultsIn DLSS group, The TFCSA/TCSA ratio are 74.33 ± 2.18 in L3/4 stenosis, 75.51 ± 2.79 in L4/5 stenosis, and 75.49 ± 2.69 in L5/S1 stenosis. there were significant decreases in the TFCSA/TCSA ratio of stenotic segments compared with non-stenotic segments of the spinal canal (P < 0.05) while no significant difference between the non-stenotic segments (P > 0.05). TFCSA/TCSA ratios is significant differences in the TFCSA/TCSA ratios of the 6 DLSS groups (F = 67.832; P < 0.05). From Group 1 to Group 6, the TFCSA/TCSA ratio of stenotic segments positively correlated with the absolute claudication distance (ACD). (P < 0.001, r = 0.852). Besides, the TFCSA/TCSA ratios are smaller in the symptomatic sides of the spine than the contralateral sides (t = 4.128, P = 0.001).ConclusionsThe stenotic segments of the spinal canal are more atrophied than the non-stenotic segment in DLSS patients. It is shows that a strong positive correlation between the severity of multifidus atrophy and the severity of spinal stenosis.

The Relationship Between Dural Ossification and Spinal Stenosis in Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum.

Dural ossification represents a difficult problem in the surgical management of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Few studies have focused on this condition because of the relatively low prevalence. We speculated that dural ossification occurs only when spinal stenosis of patients with thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum progresses. Herein, we aimed to determine the relationship between dural ossification and spinal stenosis in thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum. In this study, 123 consecutive patients with ossification of the ligamentum flavum were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-seven patients were ultimately included and were divided into a group that had dural ossification and a group that did not have dural ossification. Patient characteristics and radiographic data were recorded. The cross-sectional area occupying ratio ([1 - cross-sectional area of the narrowest level/normal cross-sectional area] × 100%) was measured and was calculated by 3 independent observers, followed by statistical analysis. The 2 groups were comparable with respect to sex, age, body mass index, and distribution of the segment with maximum compression. The mean cross-sectional area occupying ratio (and standard deviation) in the T9-T12 subgroup in the group with dural ossification (63.4% ± 8.6%) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that in the group without dural ossification (30.7% ± 10.4%). The overall interobserver reliability for measurements of the cross-sectional area occupying ratio (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.976) was excellent. Thus, the cross-sectional area occupying ratio could be used as an indicator to distinguish between patients with ossification of the ligamentum flavum who did and did not have dural ossification, with a high diagnostic value, in the T9-T12 subgroup. A cross-sectional area occupying ratio of >55% (sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 100%), the "ossification zone," was indicative of dural ossification in patients with ossification of the ligamentum flavum, whereas a value of <45% (sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.7%) was considered safe. Moreover, ratios between 45% and 55% were considered to be in the "gray zone." The results of this study indicate that the severity of spinal stenosis was significantly associated with dural ossification in ossification of the ligamentum flavum and the cross-sectional area occupying ratio may be used as an indicator of dural ossification in the lower thoracic spine. The diagnosis of dural ossification was based on the intraoperative evidence, and the results could help spine surgeons to prepare for the surgical procedure.

Spinal motion preservation surgery: indications and applications.

Fusion is one of the most commonly performed spinal procedures, indicated for a wide range of spinal problems. Elimination of motion though results in accelerated degeneration of the adjacent level, known as adjacent level disease. Motion preservation surgical methods were developed in order to overcome this complication. These methods include total disc replacement, laminoplasty, interspinous implants and dynamic posterior stabilization systems. The initial enthusiasm about these methods was followed by certain concerns about their clinical usefulness and their results. The main indications for total disc replacement are degenerative disc disease, but the numerous contraindications for this method make it difficult to find the right candidate. Application of interspinous implants has shown good results in patients with spinal stenosis, but a more precise definition is needed regarding the severity of spinal stenosis up to which these implants can be used. Laminoplasty has several advantages and less complications compared to fusion and laminectomy in patients with cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy. Dynamic posterior stabilization could replace conventional fusion in certain cases, but also in this case the results are successful only in mild to moderate cases.

Does the effectiveness of core stability exercises correlate with the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis?

Objective:To determine whether the effectiveness of core stability exercises correlates with the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:Forty-two patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated in the department of orthopedics of our hospital between May 2013 and January 2016 were included in the study. All the patients performed core stability exercises once daily for six weeks, and the clinical outcomes were evaluated using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and self-reported walking capacity. The anteroposterior osseous spinal canal diameter was measured to evaluate the severity of spinal stenosis. The correlation between the stenosis degree and the differences of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score or self-reported walking capacity at baseline and after treatment were analyzed.Results:The patients were divided into three groups according to the spinal stenosis degree. In the three groups, there was no significant difference in JOA or self-reported walking distance at baseline (p>0.05) and after treatment (p>0.05). The JOA scores and self-reported walking distance were significantly increased after treatment (p<0.05) in any of the three groups when compared to the baseline. Also, there was no significant correlation between the stenosis degree and the difference of JOA (p>0.05) or self-reported walking distance (p>0.05).Conclusion:There was no significantcorrelation between the effectiveness of core stability exercises and the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Poster 450 The Association of Dermatomal Sensory Evoked Potential and Severity of Spinal Stenosis in Magnetic Resonance Image

Poster 450 The Association of Dermatomal Sensory Evoked Potential and Severity of Spinal Stenosis in Magnetic Resonance Image

Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area Does Not Correlate with Efficacy of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Single Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Background: Spinal stenosis is a narrowing of the spinal canal, which causes mechanical compression of spinal nerve roots. The compression of these nerve roots can cause low back pain and/or leg pain, as well as neurogenic claudication. Lumbar epidural steroid injections have commonly been used in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In cases that are refractory to epidural steroid injections, percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis has been used. Objective: The aim of our study is to determine the relationship between the severity of spinal stenosis and the participants’ response to adhesiolysis, and to evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of adhesiolysis. Study Design: A prospective observational study. Methods: Sixty-six patients with degenerative LSS were enrolled in this prospective study. All participants underwent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was measured on the transverse angled sections through the central part of the disc on conventional MR images. All percutaneous adhesiolyses were performed in the operating room. One hour following the procedure, 6 mL of 8% sodium chloride solution was infused during 30 minutes in the recovery room while the patient underwent monitoring. Outcome measures were obtained using the 5-point patient satisfaction scale at 2 weeks and 6 months post-treatment. To evaluate outcome predictors, we divided the participants into 2 groups according to their response to treatment. Limitations: Secondary outcomes were not measured and the study did not include a long-term follow-up period. Results: Improvement (including reports of slightly improved, much improved, and no pain) was observed in 49 participants (74.2%) at 2 weeks and 45 participants (66.7%) at 6 months after the procedure. The dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) did not differ between participants who reported improvement and those who did not. There was no statistically significant correlation between pain relief and DSCSA, age, or participant sex. Conclusion: Percutaneous adhesiolysis was shown to be effective for the treatment of LSS, with mid-term result, without affecting DSCSA. Key words: Low back pain, lumbar spinal stenosis, failed back surgery syndrome, dural sac, interventional techniques, epidural injection, percutaneous adhesiolysis.

Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables

Although the effect of physical workload on the occurrence of low back pain (LBP) has been extensively investigated, few quantitative studies have examined the morphological changes visualized via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relation to occupational variables. The relationship between the severity of some abnormalities such as lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis and physical or psychosocial occupational risk factors has not been investigated previously. In this cross-sectional study patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) long-standing (minimum 1-year) LBP radiating down the leg (or not); (2) age more than 40 years; (3) willingness to undergo an MRI of the lumbar spine; and (4) ability to speak Italian. Primary objective of the study was to investigate the association between occupational exposure and morphological MRI findings, while controlling for the individual risk factors for LBP. Secondarily, we looked at the influence of this exposure and the degenerative changes in the lumbar spine on clinical symptoms and the related disability. Lumbar MRI scans from 120 symptomatic patients were supplemented by the results of structured interviews, which provided personal, medical, and occupational histories. All occupational factors were arranged on scales of increasing exposure, whereas pain and disability were assessed using ad hoc validated questionnaires. Evidence of intervertebral disc narrowing or herniation and the occurrence and severity of spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis was obtained from the MRI scans and a summative degenerative score was then calculated. We detected a direct association between increasing age and the global amount of degenerative change, the severity of intervertebral disc height loss, the number of narrowed discs, stenosis, the number of stenotic levels, and spondylolisthesis. Physical occupational exposure was not associated with the presence of lumbar disc degeneration and narrowing per se, but a higher degree of such an exposure was directly associated with a higher degree of degeneration (P=0.017). Spondylolistesis and stenosis were positively related to heavy workload (P=0.014) and the manual handling of materials (P=0.023), respectively. Psychosocial occupational discomfort was directly associated to stenosis (P=0.041) and number of stenotic levels (P=0.019). A heavier job workload was the only occupational factor positively related to the degree of disability at the multivariate analysis (P=0.002). Total amount of degeneration in the lumbar spine directly influenced pain duration (P=0.011) and degree of disability (P=0.050). These results suggest that caution should be exercised when symptomatic subjects with evidence of degenerative changes on MRI scans engage in strenuous physical labor.

Radiographic findings and Gs-alpha bioactivity studies and mutation screening in acrodysostosis indicate a different etiology from pseudohypoparathyroidism

Acrodysostosis is an uncommon skeletal dysplasia associated with nasal hypoplasia, midface deficiency, severe brachydactyly, and varying degrees of hearing loss and mental retardation. Previous publications have suggested that it may be difficult to distinguish acrodystostosis from pseudohypoparathyroidism on clinical grounds, but acrodysostosis does appear to have distinct clinical and radiologic findings. Spinal stenosis is an underappreciated risk in acrodysostosis, despite the reported loss of normal caudal widening of the lumbar interpediculate distance on AP spine radiographs in the original report of this disorder by Robinow et al., with confirmation of these radiographic findings by Butler et al. We report two sporadic cases of acrodysostosis, one of which required decompressive laminectomy for symptomatic spinal stenosis, and review 11 cases of acrodysostosis from 9 families that were submitted to the International Skeletal Dysplasia Registry. The objective of this report is to determine the frequency and severity of spinal stenosis in patients with acrodysostosis and to summarize the clinical and radiographic findings of acrodysostosis in an effort to distinguish acrodysostosis clearly from pseudohypoparathyroidism. The pattern of brachydactyly differs between these two conditions, and varying degrees of spinal stenosis are characteristic of acrodysostosis. Both our index patients with acrodysostosis had normal bioactivity of the alpha subunit of the Gs protein, therefore indicating that acrodysostosis has a different pathogenesis from pseudohypoparathyroidism. Furthermore, single-strand confirmational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis failed to demonstrate any confirmational alterations in the coding exons of the Gs alpha gene. These radiographic and laboratory findings substantiate that acrodysostosis is clinically different from pseudohypoparathyroidism and that it is necessary to follow patients with acrodysostosis for signs of spinal stenosis.

Diffuse posterior hyperostosis of the cervical spine with cord compression: A forestier (dish) variant

A patient presented with signs and symptoms of cervical spinal cord compression. Computed tomography (CT) scan showed diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis of the posterior vertebral border of C4, C5, C6, and C7 cervical vertebrae, with severe spinal stenosis at C5 and C6 level. Computed tomography scan is the single most useful instrument for demonstrating the extent of bony proliferation and severity of spinal stenosis.