Severity Of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Research Articles

Differentiation of severe from non-severe mitral stenosis with dimensionless index and its prognostic implications in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis

Abstract Introduction Accurate identification of the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) commonly relies on measurement of mitral valve area (MVA) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The dimensionless index (DI) of mitral valve (MV) was recently shown to be useful in identifying severity of degenerative MS. It is uncertain if DI MV is useful in rheumatic MS. Purpose We aimed to validate the DI MV in rheumatic mitral stenosis, identify threshold values of the DI MV for the accurate identification of severe and non-severe rheumatic MS, and study its association with clinically significant outcomes. Methods We studied DI MV in 406 cases of rheumatic MS, with 174 cases in a derivation cohort , 121 cases in a TTE validation cohort, and 111 cases in a transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) validation cohort. Outcome data were collected in the derivation and TTE validation cohorts. DI MV was calculated by dividing the left ventricular outflow tract pulsed-wave Doppler time-velocity integral (TVI) by the MV continuous-wave Doppler TVI. Results In the derivation cohort, ROC analysis showed that MV DI was significantly associated with MS severity (AUC = 0.838, 95% CI, 0.780-0.897, p<0.001) but no threshold value was able to identify severe MS (MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2) with both sensitivity and specificity greater than 80%. DI MV ≤ 0.34 had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (78.5% and 75.8% respectively). However, with an approach using two threshold values, namely DI MV ≤ 0.25 to identify severe MS and DI MV ≥ 0.40 to identify non-severe MS, both values showed a high specificity of 93.7%. When tested in the validation cohorts, these values have similar high specificity for identifying severe (93.8%) and non severe MS (91.4%). DI MV was univariately significant (HR = 0.075, 95% CI 0.0215-0.378, p=0.002) in Cox regression analysis for a composite outcome of death and MV intervention. Multivariate analysis incorporating age, sex, DI MV, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed that age, DI MV and PASP were independently associated with the composite outcome. Conclusion While not a replacement for MVA in the assessment of MS severity, the DI MV can rule-in or rule-out severe MS with a high specificity and is useful as a complementary tool in the integrative assessment of MS severity. DI MV is independently associated with composite outcomes of death and MV intervention.Receiver operating characteristic curveSensitivity and Specificity of DI MV

Validation of Yeo’s index in assessing severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis in mixed valve lesions

IntroductionYeo’s Index, product of the mitral leaflet separation index and dimensionless index, is a novel measure of the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). We assess Yeo’s index in patients with rheumatic MS with or without mixed valve disease. MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, Yeo’s index was measured in 237 cases of rheumatic MS − 124 in a transthoracic echocardiography validation cohort using mitral valve area (MVA) by pressure half-time and planimetry as comparator and 113 in a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) validation cohort using TEE three-dimensional MVA as comparator. Patients were considered to have mixed valve disease if they had MS and concomitant mitral regurgitation or aortic valve disease. ResultsThere were 113 patients with isolated MS and 124 patients with mixed valve disease. Overall, Yeo’s index ≤ 0.26 cm showed 93.0 % sensitivity and 87.5 % specificity for identifying severe MS (MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2). In isolated MS, Yeo’s index ≤ 0.26 cm showed sensitivity of 94.6 % and specificity of 90.0 % for identifying severe MS, while in mixed valve disease sensitivity was 90.6 % and specificity 86.7 %. Overall, Yeo’s index ≤ 0.15 cm showed 83.6 % sensitivity and 94.3 % specificity for very severe MS (MVA ≤ 1.0 cm2). In isolated MS, the threshold of ≤0.15 cm showed sensitivity of 84.4 % and specificity of 92.6 % for very severe MS, while in mixed valve disease sensitivity was 81.3 % and specificity 95.3 %. The presence of atrial fibrillation did not influence the performance of Yeo’s index. ConclusionYeo’s Index accurately differentiates severity of rheumatic MS with or without mixed valve disease.

Echocardiographic Features in Patient Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

Rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) is a progressive valvular heart disease that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. Echocardiography plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of patients with RMS. This study aims to review the utility echocardiography feature in patient RMS. We discuss the key echocardiographic parameters used for assessment and severity of RMS, and associated valvular abnormalities. Additionally, we explore the role of multimodality imaging, such as transesophageal echocardiography in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making in RMS. A thorough understanding of echocardiographic findings in RMS is essential for clinicians involved in the care of these patients, as it aids in risk stratification, treatment planning, and monitoring of disease progression. Integrating echocardiography is a widely used non-invasive method for comprehensive assessment, monitoring disease progression and evaluating treatment efficacy, ensuring optimal management for patient with RMS. Keyword: Echocardiography, Rheumatic Heart Disease, Mitral Stenosis.

Agreement between three-dimensional planimetry and mitral navigation method in the assessment of mitral valve area in rheumatic severe mitral stenosis

Introduction Rheumatic heart disease predisposes to structural changes in the mitral valve including commissural fusion and calcification with subsequent narrowing of the mitral valve orifice resulting in rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS). To define the best therapeutic strategy, an accurate measurement of mitral valve area (MVA) for RMS is of paramount importance. The propose of the present study was to assess the agreement between the mitral navigation method (MVN) and three-dimensional (3D) planimetry in the assessment of MVA in patients with RMS. Methods Patients who were diagnosed with a different degree of mitral stenosis with the standard transthoracic echocardiography methods such as the pressure half time and planimetry underwent 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination. 3D TEE zoom mitral valve planimetry was measured in the diastolic frame during the mitral valve’s largest opening. By using MVN software of the Philips Q-Lab, MVA was measured at its maximum diastolic opening. Both 3D planimetry (3DPL) and MVN were measured at the mid diastole during the mitral valve’s largest opening. Results In this retrospective analysis, we examined consecutive 37 RMS patients (mean age 51.1 ± 11.6 years, 31 patients were female). MVA measured by the MVN method was found to be highly correlated with the 3D MVA measured by 3DPL (r = 0.937, p<.001). Conclusions Based on our results, we showed that the MVN method may be additionally used in detecting the severity of RMS.

Association of Posterior to Anterior Mitral Valve Leaflets Length Ratio with Severity of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

Association of Posterior to Anterior Mitral Valve Leaflets Length Ratio with Severity of Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with severity of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis.

BackgroundRheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a serious health concern in developing countries. Rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS) is the most long-term sequel in RHD. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a novel marker, and a higher NLR has been associated with poor clinical outcomes in various cardiovascular disorders. We evaluated the availability of NLR to predict severity of mitral stenosis (MS) in patients with RHD.MethodsWe analyzed 300 consecutive patients with RMS. The patients were divided into tertiles according to NLR: 0.85< NLR ≤1.85 (n=100, tertile 1), 1.86≤ NLR ≤2.46 (n=100, tertile 2), and 2.47≤ NLR ≤7.08 (n=100, tertile 3). Patients with RMS were divided into three groups based on the degree of MS as mild, moderate, and severe MS. After the initial evaluation, 187 patients with moderate-to-severe RMS (Group 1) and 113 patients with mild RMS (Group 2) were reassessed.ResultsThe patients with severe RMS had significantly elevated NLR, mean platelet volume, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure values compared to patients with moderate and mild MS (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001 respectively). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that high levels of NLR was an independent predictor of severe RMS (odds ratio =0.68, P=0.008). Moderate-to-severe RMS incidence was significantly higher among patients in the tertile 3 (odds ratio =2.8, P=0.001).ConclusionNLR is a new inflammatory marker and a simple, rapid, and easily accessible prognostic parameter that can be associated with severity of RMS in patients with RHD.

Reply to the letter to the editor by F. A. Flachskampf et al. Determination of stenotic mitral valve area: new, old, and gold standards

We completely agree with the comments of Dr Flachskampf and Dr Klinghammer. In fact, as we concluded in the work ‘We should keep in mind the fact that 3D-echo planimetry may be a better reference method than the Gorlin method to assess the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis’.1 Thus, we did not want to definitively establish …

Which method should be the reference method to evaluate the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis? Gorlin's method versus 3D-echo

Several studies have shown a wide variability among different methods to determine the valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate if 3D-echo planimetry is more accurate than the Gorlin method to measure the valve area. Twenty-six patients with mitral stenosis underwent 2D and 3D-echo echocardiographic examinations and catheterization. Valve area was estimated by different methods. A median value of the mitral valve area, obtained from the measurements of three classical non-invasive methods (2D planimetry, pressure half-time and PISA method), was used as the reference method and it was compared with 3D-echo planimetry and Gorlin's method. Our results showed that the accuracy of 3D-echo planimetry is superior to the accuracy of the Gorlin method for the assessment of mitral valve area. We should keep in mind the fact that 3D-echo planimetry may be a better reference method than the Gorlin method to assess the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis.

Profile and prediction of severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis in children

Profile and prediction of severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis in children

Severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis in children

Clinical, hemodynamic and operative findings of 125 children, up to the age of 12 years, were analysed to determine if the severity of pulmonary venous and arterial hypertension correlated with the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis. Moderately severe to severe pulmonary venous and arterial hypertension was found in almost three-quarters of the patients. Operative findings indicated critical mitral stenosis in 69% of the cases. In India, following rheumatic fever, some patients follow an unusually rapid course in developing mitral stenosis severe enough to require operative treatment, even at the age of six years.