Initial Severity Of Illness Research Articles

Prior emergency medical services utilization is a risk factor for in-hospital death among patients with substance misuse: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundSubstance misuse poses a significant public health challenge, characterized by premature morbidity and mortality, and heightened healthcare utilization. While studies have demonstrated that previous hospitalizations and emergency department visits are associated with increased mortality in patients with substance misuse, it is unknown whether prior utilization of emergency medical service (EMS) is similarly associated with poor outcomes among this population. The objective of this study is to determine the association between EMS utilization in the 30 days before a hospitalization or emergency department visit and in-hospital outcomes among patients with substance misuse.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of adult emergency department visits and hospitalizations (referred to as a hospital encounter) between 2017 and 2021 within the Substance Misuse Data Commons, which maintains electronic health records from substance misuse patients seen at two University of Wisconsin hospitals, linked with state agency, claims, and socioeconomic datasets. Using regression models, we examined the association between EMS use and the outcomes of in-hospital death, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and critical illness events, defined by invasive mechanical ventilation or vasoactive drug administration. Models were adjusted for age, comorbidities, initial severity of illness, substance misuse type, and socioeconomic status.ResultsAmong 19,402 encounters, individuals with substance misuse who had at least one EMS incident within 30 days of a hospital encounter experienced a higher likelihood of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI [1.05 – 2.14]) compared to those without prior EMS use, after adjusting for confounders. Using EMS in the 30 days prior to an encounter was associated with a small increase in hospital length of stay but was not associated with ICU admission or critical illness events.ConclusionsIndividuals with substance misuse who have used EMS in the month preceding a hospital encounter are at an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Enhanced monitoring of EMS users in this population could improve overall patient outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of ADEM-like and tumefactive presentations of CNS demyelination: a case-comparison analysis

A minority of initial multiple sclerosis (MS) presentations clinically or radiologically resemble other central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) or tumefactive demyelination (atypical demyelination presentations). With the aim of better defining the long-term outcomes of this group we have performed a retrospective cohort comparison of atypical demyelination versus ‘typical’ MS presentations. Twenty-seven cases with atypical presentations (both first and subsequent demyelinating events) were identified and compared with typical MS cases. Disease features analysed included relapse rates, disability severity, whole brain and lesion volumes, lesion number and distribution. Atypical cases represented 3.9% of all MS cases. There was considerable overlap in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ADEM-like and tumefactive demyelination cases. ADEM-like cases tended to be younger but not significantly so. Atypical cases showed a trend towards higher peak expanded disability severity score (EDSS) score at the time of their atypical presentation. Motor, cranial nerve, cerebellar, cerebral and multifocal presentations were all more common in atypical cases, and less likely to present with optic neuritis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white cell counts were higher in atypical cases (p = 0.002). One atypical case was associated with peripheral blood myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies, but subsequent clinical and radiological course was in keeping with MS. There was no difference in long-term clinical outcomes including annualised relapse rates (ARR), brain volume, lesion numbers or lesion distributions. Atypical demyelination cases were more likely to receive high potency disease modifying therapy early in the course of their illness. Despite the severity of initial illness, our cohort analysis suggests that atypical demyelination presentations do not confer a higher risk of long-term adverse outcomes.

Symptoms and Conditions in Children and Adults up to 90 Days after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study Utilizing the Common Data Model.

Background/Objectives: There have been widespread reports of persistent symptoms in both children and adults after SARS-CoV-2 infection, giving rise to debates on whether it should be regarded as a separate clinical entity from other postviral syndromes. This study aimed to characterize the clinical presentation of post-acute symptoms and conditions in the Korean pediatric and adult populations. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using a national, population-based database, which was encoded using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM). We compared individuals diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 to those diagnosed with influenza, focusing on the risk of developing prespecified symptoms and conditions commonly associated with the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. Results: Propensity score matching yielded 1,656 adult and 343 pediatric SARS-CoV-2 and influenza pairs. Ninety days after diagnosis, no symptoms were found to have elevated risk in either adults or children when compared with influenza controls. Conversely, at 1 day after diagnosis, adults with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited a significantly higher risk of developing abnormal liver function tests, cardiorespiratory symptoms, constipation, cough, thrombophlebitis/thromboembolism, and pneumonia. In contrast, children diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 did not show an increased risk for any symptoms during either acute or post-acute phases. Conclusions: In the acute phase after infection, SARS-CoV-2 is associated with an elevated risk of certain symptoms in adults. The risk of developing post-acute COVID-19 sequelae is not significantly different from that of having postviral symptoms in children in both the acute and post-acute phases, and in adults in the post-acute phase. These observations warrant further validation through studies, including the severity of initial illness, vaccination status, and variant types.

Medical Complexity, Language Use, and Outcomes in the Pediatric ICU.

To determine whether use of a language other than English (LOE) would be associated with medical complexity, and whether medical complexity and LOE together would be associated with worse clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of this single-site retrospective cohort study of PICU encounters from September 1, 2017, through August 31, 2022 was an association between LOE and medical complexity. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed between demographic factors and medical complexity, both for unique patients and for all encounters. We investigated outcomes of initial illness severity (using Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2), length of stay (LOS), days without mechanical ventilation or organ dysfunction using a mixed effects regression model, controlling for age, sex, race and ethnicity, and insurance status. There were 6802 patients and 10 011 encounters. In multivariable analysis for all encounters, Spanish use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.49) and language other than English or Spanish (LOES) (aOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.80) were associated with medical complexity. Among unique patients, there remained an association between use of Spanish and medical complexity in multivariable analysis (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.52) but not between LOES and medical complexity (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92-1.83). Children with medical complexity (CMC) who used an LOES had fewer organ dysfunction-free days (P = .003), PICU LOS was 1.53 times longer (P = .01), and hospital LOS was 1.45 times longer (P = .01) compared with CMC who used English. Use of an LOE was independently associated with medical complexity. CMC who used an LOES had a longer LOS.

Low Field MRI Surveillance 6-24 Months Post-acute COVID-19 Pneumonia: Factors Influencing Severity and Evolution of Lung Opacities

To determine factors influencing low-field MRI lung opacity severity 6-24 months after acute Covid-19 pneumonia. 104 post-acute Covid-19 patients with 167 MRI exams were included. 32 patients had more than one exam, and 63 exams were serial exams. Pulmonary findings were graded on a scale of 0-4 by quadrant, total score ranging from 0 (no opacity) to 16 (opacity > 75%), and score >8 considered moderate and >12 severe opacity. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Spearman rank correlation was used to assess the association of clinical and demographic factors with MR opacity severity at time intervals from acute infection. Random coefficients regression was used to assess whether opacity score changed over time. Severity of initial illness was associated with increased MR opacity score at timeframes up to 24 months (p<.05). Among the 167 exams, moderate to severe MR opacities (total opacity score >8) were identified in 33% of exams beyond 6 months: 37% at 6 - <12 months (n=23/63); 31% at 12- <18 months (n=13/42); 25% at 18- <24 months (n=6/24); and 50% at >24 months (n=3/6). No significant change in total opacity score over time was identified by random coefficients regression. Among the 32 patients with serial exams, 11 demonstrated no change in opacity score from initial to final exam, 10 decrease in score (mean 2.3, stdev 1.25, range 1-4), and 11 increase in score (average 2.8, stdev 1.48, range 1-7). Initial Covid-19 disease severity was associated with increased MRI total opacity score at time intervals up to 24 months, and moderate to severe opacities were commonly identified by low-field MRI beyond 6 months from acute illness.

Association between Intermittent Hypoxemia and NICU Length of Stay in Preterm Infants

Introduction: Length of hospitalization varies widely in preterm infants and can be affected by multiple maternal and neonatal factors including respiratory instability. Therefore, we aimed to determine the association between postnatal intermittent hypoxemia (IH) and prolonged hospitalization. Methods: This prospective single-center cohort study followed infants born at <31 weeks of gestational age through 2 years corrected age with detailed oxygen saturation data captured from days 7 to 30 of age. Results: 51/164 (31%) of infants were discharged after 400/7 weeks of corrected gestational age (CGA). A greater average daily number of IH events (OR per 10 events/day 1.33 [95% CI 1.03–1.72]), duration of events (OR per minute 1.14 [1.07–1.21]), and percent time with oxygen saturation <80% (OR per percent 1.88 [1.25–2.85]) on days 7–30 of age were all significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization past 400/7 weeks CGA. In survival analyses, infants with a greater average daily number of IH events (HR per 10 events/day 0.89 [0.81–0.98]), percent time with oxygen saturation <80% (HR per percent 0.79 [0.67–0.94]), and duration of events (HR per minute 0.93 [0.91–0.95]) on days 7–30 of age all had significantly lower probability of earlier discharge. In addition, there was a significant interaction with gestational age; the association between IH and prolonged hospitalization was stronger in more mature infants (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Physiological instability on days 7–30 of age, as manifested by IH, is significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization. IH likely represents both a marker of initial severity of illness and the beginning of biological cascades, leading to prematurity-associated morbidities.

Risk factors associated with short- and long-term kidney injury in children with post infectious glomerulonephritis.

Post infectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN) is the most common form of acute glomerulonephritis in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for kidney injury in children with PIGN referred to a tertiary care center. This was a retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI) at initial presentation; secondary outcome was composite kidney injury, defined as reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, or hypertension at last follow-up. Binary logistic regression defined risk factors associated with the primary and secondary outcomes. We identified 125 PIGN cases with a mean age of 8.3±3.5years at presentation and 252 ± 501days of follow-up. Sixty-six percent (79/119) presented with AKI and 57% (71/125) were admitted to hospital. Shorter time to seeing a nephrologist (OR 6.7, 95%CI 1.8-24.6), nadir C3 < 0.12g/L (OR 10.2, 95%CI 1.9-53.7), starting an antihypertensive medication (OR 7.6, 95%CI 1.8-31.3), and nephrotic range proteinuria (OR 3.8, 95%CI 1.2-12.4) were independent risk factors for AKI when adjusted for each other. At last follow-up 35% (44/125) of the cohort had the composite outcome, with older age at presentation (OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.04-1.4) and nadir C3 < 0.17g/L (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.04-6.7) being independent risk factors when adjusted for AKI. PIGN is an important cause of AKI in children and adolescents. The severity of initial illness is associated with the extent of kidney injury in both the short- and longer-term. Findings will help identify cases requiring lengthier surveillance. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Omicron, Long-COVID, and the Safety of Elective Surgery for Adults and Children: Joint Guidance from the Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee of the Surgical Infection Society and the Surgery Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services

Background: Active and recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections are associated with morbidity and mortality after surgery in adults. Current recommendations suggest delaying elective surgery in survivors for four to 12 weeks, depending on initial illness severity. Recently, the predominant causes of COVID-19 are the highly transmissible/less virulent Omicron variant/subvariants. Moreover, increased survivability of primary infections has engendered the long-COVID syndrome, with protean manifestations that may persist for months. Considering the more than 600,000,000 COVID-19 survivors, surgeons will likely be consulted by recovered patients seeking elective operations. Knowledge gaps of the aftermath of Omicron infections raise questions whether extant guidance for timing of surgery still applies to adults or should apply to the pediatric population. Methods: Scoping review of relevant English-language literature. Results: Most supporting data derive from early in the pandemic when the Alpha variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) predominated. The Omicron variant/subvariants generally cause milder infections with less organ dysfunction; many infections are asymptomatic, especially in children. Data are scant with respect to adult surgical outcomes after Omicron infection, and especially so for pediatric surgical outcomes at any stage of the pandemic. Conclusions: Numerous knowledge gaps persist with respect to the disease, the recovered pre-operative patient, the nature of the proposed procedure, and supporting data. For example, should the waiting period for all but urgent elective surgery be extended beyond 12 weeks, e.g., after serious/critical illness, or for patients with long-COVID and organ dysfunction? Conversely, can the waiting periods for asymptomatic patients or vaccinated patients be shortened? How shall children be risk-stratified, considering the distinctiveness of pediatric COVID-19 and the paucity of data? Forthcoming guidelines will hopefully answer these questions but may require ongoing modifications based on additional new data and the epidemiology of emerging strains.

Differential Effect of Targeted Temperature Management Between 32 °C and 36 °C Following Cardiac Arrest According to Initial Severity of Illness: Insights From Two International Data Sets

Recent guidelines have emphasized actively avoiding fever to improve outcomes in patients who are comatose following resuscitation from cardiac arrest (ie, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest). However, whether targeted temperature management between 32 °C and 36 °C (TTM32-36) can improve neurologic outcome in some patients remains debated. Is there an association between the use of TTM32-36 and outcome according to severity assessed at ICU admission using a previously derived risk score? Data prospectively collected in the Sudden Death Expertise Center (SDEC) registry (France) between May 2011 and December 2017 and in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions (ROC-CCC) trial (United States and Canada) between June 2011 and May 2015 were used for this study. Severity at ICU admission was assessed through a modified version of the Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (mCAHP) score, divided into tertiles of severity. The study explored associations between TTM32-36 and favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge by using multiple logistic regression as well as in tertiles of severity for each data set. A total of 2,723 patients were analyzed in the SDEC data set and 4,202 patients in the ROC-CCC data set. A favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge occurred in 728 (27%) patients in the French data set and in 1,239 (29%) patients in the North American data set. Among the French data set, TTM32-36 was independently associated with better neurologic outcome in the tertile of patients with low (adjusted OR, 1.63; 95%CI, 1.15-2.30; P= .006) and high (adjusted OR, 1.94; 95%CI, 1.06-3.54; P= .030) severity according to mCAHP at ICU admission. Similar results were observed in the North American data set (adjusted ORs of 1.36 [95%CI, 1.05-1.75; P= .020] and 2.42 [95%CI, 1.38-4.24; P= .002], respectively). No association was observed between TTM32-36 and outcome in the moderate groups of the two data sets. TTM32-36 was significantly associated with a better outcome in patients with low and high severity at ICU admission assessed according to the mCAHP score. Further studies are needed to evaluate individualized temperature control following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Protocol for a Nested, Retrospective Study of the Australian Placental Transfusion Study Cohort.

BackgroundNeonates, particularly if born preterm or with congenital anomalies, are among the pediatric patients most likely to need blood transfusion. However, they are also particularly vulnerable to adverse consequences of blood transfusion. Aiming to clamp the umbilical cord for at least a minute after birth is a simple safe procedure that is being increasingly adopted worldwide, although may be associated with increased rates of polycythemia and jaundice. It may also reduce the proportion of preterm babies who need a blood transfusion. The mechanisms for this are not fully understood. Potential mechanisms could include an increased volume of blood transfusion from the placenta to the baby after birth, and an overall reduction in the severity of illness in the first weeks after birth, which could lead to fewer blood tests and greater tolerance of anemia, or enhanced erythropoiesis.ObjectivesTo investigate the mechanism behind the reduced need for blood transfusions after deferral of cord clamping.MethodologyThis protocol outlines the methods and data analysis plan for a study using nested retrospective data from a large randomized trial combined with additional data collected from patient medical and pathology records. The additional data items to be collected all relate to the receipt of transfusion and the factors that affect the risk for transfusion in preterm babies. The analysis will include all randomized babies from Australia and New Zealand for whom data are available. Causal mediation analysis is planned to estimate the effects of mediators on the relationship between the timing of cord clamping and the need for blood transfusion. The analysis is designed to discern whether initial severity of illness or the magnitude of placental transfusion mediates red blood cell transfusion dependence.Anticipated outcomes and disseminationWe expect the study will identify potential strategies for reducing blood transfusions and associated negative outcomes in preterm infants. This will be relevant to researchers, clinicians, and parents. The results will be disseminated through publications, presentations, and inclusion in evidence-based guidelines.

Nurse staffing levels in critical care: The impact of patient characteristics.

Intensive care is one of the most resource-intensive forms of care because seriously ill patients are cared for in units with high staffing levels. Studies show that the number of registered nurses (RNs) per patient and nurse education level affects patient outcome. However, there is a lack of studies that consider how nurses/patient ratio with an advanced educational level of specialized nurses in intensive care, affect the intensive care performed in different patient populations. To investigate if differences in patient characteristics and nurse-patient ratio have an impact on the quality of care. This is a retrospective observational study with a review of all patients >15 years receiving care at two general intensive care units with different nurse/patient ratio (unit A, 1:1 nurse/patient ratio and unit B, 0.5:1 nurse/patient ratio). There was no significant difference in the initial severity of illness between the units. However, younger patients, male patients and patients requiring surgery entailed a higher workload and a longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay despite a 1:1 critical care nurse/patient ratio. A small difference, but not significant, with more unplanned re-intubations occurred at unit A compared with unit B. The differences in the nurse/patient ratio did not reflect a difference in the severity of illness among admitted patients but might be explained by patient characteristics with different needs. Health care managers should consider not only the number of nurses but also their educational level, specific competencies and skills mix and nursing-sensitive measures to provide high-quality ICU care in settings with different patient characteristics. Nursing-sensitive patient outcomes should be considered in relation to nurse/patient ratio, as important to measure to ensure a high quality of patient care in the ICU.

Acquisition of new medical devices among the persistently critically ill: A retrospective cohort study in the Veterans Affairs.

Patients who develop persistent critical illness remain in the ICU predominately because they develop new late-onset organ failure(s), which may render them at risk of acquiring a new medical device. The epidemiology and short-term outcomes of patients with persistent critical illness who acquire a new medical device are unknown.We retrospectively studied a cohort admitted to the Veterans Affairs (VA) ICUs from 2014 to 2019. Persistent critical illness was defined as an ICU length of stay of at least 14 days. Receipt of new devices was defined as acquisition of a new tracheostomy, feeding tube (including gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes), implantable cardiac device, or ostomy. Logistic regression models were fit to identify patient factors associated with the acquisition of each new medical device. Among hospitalized survivors, 90-day posthospitalization discharge location and mortality were identified.From 2014 to 2019, there were 13,184 ICU hospitalizations in the VA which developed persistent critical illness. In total, 30.4% of patients (N = 3998/13,184) acquired at least 1 medical device during their persistent critical illness period. Patients with an initial higher severity of illness and prolonged hospital stay preICU admission had higher odds of acquiring each medical device. Among patients who survived their hospitalization, discharge location and mortality did not significantly differ among those who acquired a new medical device as compared to those who did not.Less than one-third of patients with persistent critical illness acquire a new medical device and no significant difference in short-term outcomes was identified. Future work is needed to understand if the acquisition of new medical devices is contributing to the development of persistent critical illness.

Significantly improved outcomes – both in retention and CGI scores - using Long Acting Buprenorphine (LAB-Buvidal) versus treatment as usual for Opioid Dependence in Wales during the Pandemic

IntroductionWe have been using LAB (Buvidal) in Cardiff after its pandemic use was funded by Welsh Government.ObjectivesWe wished to review the benefits of introducing LAB (Buvidal) into treatment during the pandemic.MethodsThis service development review of the first 73 patients treated with LAB (24mg/96mg rapid titration Welsh protocol) was analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Results43 (58%) male, 30 (41%) female. &lt;25years=1, 38 (52%) aged 25-40, 34 (47%) 40-55. Prior to LAB 14% (10 people) using Espranor, 8% (6) Buprenorphine, 28% (20) Methadone. 50% (36) illicit opiates (mainly Heroin). We had continuous data for patients for up to 9 months of LAB. Two stopped for non-discontinuation reasons: One wanted to detox, one died of natural causes (LAB-unrelated). Both were excluded from discontinuation rate analysis. 55 people have data for over a month. Of these, 11 discontinued treatment. 80% remained on LAB for 1 month or more [95%CI 67-90%]. Kaplan-Meier plots showed similar discontinuation rates when comparing different OST programmes or none prior to LAB, and comparing by age, sex and initial illness severity (CGI severity). These rates all far exceeded data for traditional OST. CGI scores dramatically improved, even at one week. By month 2 all scores “much improved” or “very much improved”.ConclusionsBuvidal (LAB) has 80% retention rates, regardless of underlying prescribed/illicit opioid /demographics. The commonly held belief that those on heroin are further from Recovery than those more stable on OAD may be incorrect. LAB may be a more acceptable and useful first line therapy that other OSTsDisclosure Dr Melichar has provided consultancy work, presentations, training and chaired panel discussions for all the companies in this area in the UK and some outside the UK. Recent work includes Althea (UK), Britannia (UK), Camurus (UK and Global), Martindale (U

Assessing level of fatigue after exposure of individual with Covid-19 virus: An observational study

Background:COVID-19 is a truly multisystem disease, with common extra-respiratory complications affecting the cardiac (arrhythmias and myocardial injury), renal (acute kidney injury), gastrointestinal, nervous (neuropathy, encephalopathy), endocrine and musculoskeletal (weakness, pain, and fatigue) systems. Fatigue is a common symptom in those presenting with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. However, it is unknown if COVID-19 results in persistent fatigue in those recovered from acute infection. This study highlights the importance of assessing those recovering from COVID-19 for symptoms of severe fatigue, irrespective of severity of initial illness, and may identify a group worthy of further study and early intervention. Purpose of study: There is currently very limited information on the nature and prevalence of post‐COVID‐19 symptoms after hospital discharge. Methodology: Patient exposed with covid-19 virus were followed up and they were assessed for severity of fatigue by using Chalder fatigue scale. Online google forms were sent to participants. Participants who were unable to understand the scale were followed up by telephone screening method. Result: Fatigue was present in 76% patients who was suffered from covid-19 with standard deviation of 19.558 ± 4.69. Conclusion: COVID-19 is a new illness, with symptoms post COVID-19, yet to be researched. Prevalence of fatigue is high in post COVID patients.

COVCOG 1: Factors Predicting Physical, Neurological and Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID in a Community Sample. A First Publication From the COVID and Cognition Study.

Since its first emergence in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has evolved into a global pandemic. Whilst often considered a respiratory disease, a large proportion of COVID-19 patients report neurological symptoms, and there is accumulating evidence for neural damage in some individuals, with recent studies suggesting loss of gray matter in multiple regions, particularly in the left hemisphere. There are a number of mechanisms by which COVID-19 infection may lead to neurological symptoms and structural and functional changes in the brain, and it is reasonable to expect that many of these may translate into cognitive problems. Indeed, cognitive problems are one of the most commonly reported symptoms in those experiencing “Long COVID”—the chronic illness following COVID-19 infection that affects between 10 and 25% of patients. The COVID and Cognition Study is a part cross-sectional, part longitudinal, study documenting and aiming to understand the cognitive problems in Long COVID. In this first paper from the study, we document the characteristics of our sample of 181 individuals who had experienced COVID-19 infection, and 185 who had not. We explore which factors may be predictive of ongoing symptoms and their severity, as well as conducting an in-depth analysis of symptom profiles. Finally, we explore which factors predict the presence and severity of cognitive symptoms, both throughout the ongoing illness and at the time of testing. The main finding from this first analysis is that that severity of initial illness is a significant predictor of the presence and severity of ongoing symptoms, and that some symptoms during the initial illness—particularly limb weakness—may be more common in those that have more severe ongoing symptoms. Symptom profiles can be well described in terms of 5 or 6 factors, reflecting the variety of this highly heterogenous condition experienced by the individual. Specifically, we found that neurological/psychiatric and fatigue/mixed symptoms during the initial illness, and that neurological, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary/fatigue symptoms during the ongoing illness, predicted experience of cognitive symptoms.

Early supplemental parenteral nutrition is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill surgical patients with high nutritional risk

Adequate nutritional provision is important for critically ill patients to improve clinical outcomes. Starting enteral nutrition (EN) as early as possible is recommended and preferred to parenteral nutrition (PN). However, patients who undergo emergency abdominal operations may have alterations in their intra-abdominal environment and gastrointestinal motility leading to limitation in starting an enteral diet. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the benefit of early supplemental PN to achieve adequate calorie and protein supply in critically ill patients undergoing surgery who are not eligible for early EN. We reviewed the medical records of 317 patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) between January 2013 and December 2018. The nutritional data of the patients were collected for 7 days in maximum, starting on the day of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The patients were divided by low or high malnutrition risk using the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score and body mass index. The low- and high-risk groups were subdivided into the following two categories: those who received PN within 48h ("early") and those who did not ("usual"). Data regarding the baseline characteristics, initial severity of illness, morbidity, and mortality rates were also obtained. The average calorie and protein supply per day were calculated in these groups. Patients in all groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics, initial status, and infectious complications. In terms of outcomes, patients with low malnutrition risk had no significant difference in mortality. However, among patients with high malnutrition risk, the "Early" group had lower rates of 30-day mortality (7.6% vs. 26.7%, p=0.006) and in-hospital mortality (13.6% vs. 28.9%, p=0.048) than those of the "Usual" group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for 30-day mortality in these groups also showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.001). The caloric adequacy of the "Early" group and the "Usual" group were 0.88±0.34 and 0.6±0.29, respectively. Amounts of protein received were 0.94±0.39g/kg in the "Early" group and 0.47±0.34g/kg in the "Usual" group, respectively. There was no significant difference in infectious complications between both groups. Mortality in patients with high malnutrition risk who received early PN supply within 48h after emergency surgery for cIAI was lower than those who did not receive PN earlier. PN may be necessary to fulfill the caloric and protein requirements for critically ill patients who cannot achieve their nutritional requirements to the fullest with EN alone.

Long COVID in a prospective cohort of home-isolated patients

Long-term complications after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are common in hospitalized patients, but the spectrum of symptoms in milder cases needs further investigation. We conducted a long-term follow-up in a prospective cohort study of 312 patients—247 home-isolated and 65 hospitalized—comprising 82% of total cases in Bergen during the first pandemic wave in Norway. At 6 months, 61% (189/312) of all patients had persistent symptoms, which were independently associated with severity of initial illness, increased convalescent antibody titers and pre-existing chronic lung disease. We found that 52% (32/61) of home-isolated young adults, aged 16–30 years, had symptoms at 6 months, including loss of taste and/or smell (28%, 17/61), fatigue (21%, 13/61), dyspnea (13%, 8/61), impaired concentration (13%, 8/61) and memory problems (11%, 7/61). Our findings that young, home-isolated adults with mild COVID-19 are at risk of long-lasting dyspnea and cognitive symptoms highlight the importance of infection control measures, such as vaccination.

Parent-reported health status of preterm survivors in a Canadian cohort

ObjectivesHealth status (HS)/ health-related quality of life measures, completed by self or proxy, are important outcome indicators. Most HS literature on children born preterm includes adolescents and adults with limited...

The Johns Hopkins Post-Acute COVID-19 Team (PACT): A Multidisciplinary, Collaborative, Ambulatory Framework Supporting COVID-19 Survivors

The Johns Hopkins Post-Acute COVID-19 Team (PACT): A Multidisciplinary, Collaborative, Ambulatory Framework Supporting COVID-19 Survivors

Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection.

Fatigue is a common symptom in those presenting with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. However, it is unknown if COVID-19 results in persistent fatigue in those recovered from acute infection. We examined the prevalence of fatigue in individuals recovered from the acute phase of COVID-19 illness using the Chalder Fatigue Score (CFQ-11). We further examined potential predictors of fatigue following COVID-19 infection, evaluating indicators of COVID-19 severity, markers of peripheral immune activation and circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Of 128 participants (49.5 ± 15 years; 54% female), more than half reported persistent fatigue (67/128; 52.3%) at median of 10 weeks after initial COVID-19 symptoms. There was no association between COVID-19 severity (need for inpatient admission, supplemental oxygen or critical care) and fatigue following COVID-19. Additionally, there was no association between routine laboratory markers of inflammation and cell turnover (leukocyte, neutrophil or lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein) or pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-6 or sCD25) and fatigue post COVID-19. Female gender and those with a pre-existing diagnosis of depression/anxiety were over-represented in those with fatigue. Our findings demonstrate a significant burden of post-viral fatigue in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection after the acute phase of COVID-19 illness. This study highlights the importance of assessing those recovering from COVID-19 for symptoms of severe fatigue, irrespective of severity of initial illness, and may identify a group worthy of further study and early intervention.