Fecal Incontinence Severity Research Articles

Validated questionnaires for the assessment of Italian patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions: a systematic review.

Pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs) have a complex, multifactorial pathophysiology that impacts women's health and must be identified to provide the most appropriate care and treatment. Therefore, symptom and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, briefly identified as patient-reported outcomes (PROs), have been developed. Despite the large number of questionnaires available for the assessment of PFDs and QoL-related issues in English, few of them have been validated for the Italian language. The aim of this article is to systematically review the literature on Italian-language validated PROs for PFDs assessment, along with practical information on literature references and suggestions on how to obtain each individual questionnaire. A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was performed up to 1 March 2024. PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were used to identify validated questionnaires in Italian language for PFDs. Once identified, the possibility of obtaining a copy of the questionnaire was checked, and the steps to obtain one are given in the text. Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on Lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more Italian PRO validation papers than the previous review. Specifically, the newly validated PROs include: Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), Vaizey and Wexner and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) questionnaires, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire, Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT). This systematic review is intended to be a tool to promote the adoption of appropriate PROs when studying PFDs in Italian patients.

Peran Pemeriksaan Keparahan Inkontinensia Fekal dengan Kuisioner FISI pada Kelompok Lanjut Usia

Fecal incontinence (IF) is the inability to control the release of feces, often occurring in the elderly due to decreased physiological function of the pelvic muscles. Assessment of the severity of fecal incontinence requires a valid instrument such as the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), which is based on a score to classify IF conditions. This community service activity was carried out with 93 elderly participants who took part in the FISI examination and education in order to increase understanding of the severity of fecal incontinence and the importance of preventive measures through early detection. The education program was carried out using the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) method which provides information related to risks, preventive efforts, and healthy lifestyle-based management steps. The average FISI score shows variations in severity among participants, providing an objective picture of the condition of the elderly. FISI acts as an important evaluation tool for monitoring and education, helping the elderly and their families understand their condition and take preventive measures. FISI examination in this program improves the quality of life of the elderly through effective education and prevention strategies

Correlation of Digital Rectal Examination and Anorectal Manometry with Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Women with Fecal Incontinence.

Standardized digital rectal examination (DRE) correlates with anorectal manometry (ARM) measures. However, less is known about the relationship between DRE/ARM measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), especially among women with fecal incontinence (FI). Our aims were to evaluate associations between DRE and ARM measures and compare PROs with diagnostic evaluation measures for women with FI. We analyzed data from the parent clinical trial, Controlling Anal incontinence by Performing Anal exercises with Biofeedback or Loperamide (CAPABLe). We pooled data from randomized women who completed standardized ARM, DRE, and validated PROs at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment initiation. PROs included FI severity, impact on quality of life, and bowel diary data. We analyzed ARM pressure and volume data and DRE using the Digital Rectal Examination Scoring System (DRESS) resting and squeeze mean scores. We used Spearman Rank Correlation to measure associations between the ARM measures and mean DRESS scores, and between PROs and ARM/DRESS scores. Among 291 randomized women with ARM and DRE data, the correlation between DRESS and ARM resting measures was 0.196 (p<0.001) and between squeeze measures was 0.247 (p<0.001). At most timepoints, PROs more consistently correlated with squeeze ARM pressures and squeeze DRESS scores than resting measures. We found weak correlations between ARM and DRE measures and between those measures and PROs. Although DRE and ARM are commonly used diagnostic measures among women with FI, the weak correlations with patient-reported symptoms raises questions about their utility in clinical care.

Toward a core outcome set for faecal incontinence-A systematic review of outcomes reported in the literature.

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent issue which can have a detrimental impact on the patient's quality of life. Current international guidelines lack strong treatment recommendations due to few studies in the field, in combination with the heterogeneity in outcome reporting. To address this, a core outcome set (COS) is proposed to standardize outcome reporting in FI studies, facilitating meta-analyses and enhancing therapeutic recommendations. Through several steps outlined by COMET 'what' to measure will be determined prior to determining 'how' to measure these outcomes. This systematic review aims to identify 'what' outcomes have been used in FI intervention studies so far in adult patients as a starting phase for the development of a future COS for FI. Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched to identify all outcomes reported in comparative effectiveness trials assessing one or more treatment option in adult patients suffering from FI. The outcomes were categorized according to the Core Outcome Measurement in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy to standardize outcome terminology, assess completeness, and inform subsequent steps in COS development. A total of 109 studies were included, which revealed 51 unique outcomes classified into 38 domains within four core areas. On average four outcomes were reported per study (range 1-11). The most commonly reported outcomes were "severity of FI" (83%), "quality of life" (64%), "number of FI episodes" (40%), "anorectal motor function" (39%), and "frequency of bowel movements" (16%). This systematic review offers an overview of outcomes reported in FI studies, highlighting the heterogeneity between studies. This heterogeneity emphasizes the need for standardizing outcome reporting which can be established through the creation of a COS.

Faecal incontinence: Retentive, non-retentive and when to suspect organic pathology.

Faecal incontinence is a highly prevalent and very distressing condition that occurs throughout the entire paediatric age. To summarise advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment of children with faecal incontinence due to either disorders of gut-brain interaction or organic diseases. Literature review on prevalence, impact, diagnosis and treatment options for children with faecal incontinence, interspersed with observations from the author's lifelong career focused on evaluation of children with motility disorders. Faecal incontinence in children is most commonly due to unrecognised or insufficiently treated functional constipation with overflow incontinence. Non-retentive faecal incontinence (NRFI) is probably more common than previously thought and is particularly challenging to treat. Organic diseases such as anorectal malformations (ARMs), Hirschsprung disease and spinal defects are often associated with faecal incontinence; in these conditions, faecal incontinence has a profound impact on quality of life. Recognition of the different pathophysiologic mechanisms causing the incontinence is essential for a successful treatment plan. Athorough physical examination and history is all that is needed in the diagnosis of the causes of faecal incontinence related to disorders of gut-brain interaction. Colonic transit studies or x-rays may help to differentiate retentive from NRFI. Manometry tests are helpful in determining the mechanisms underlying the incontinence in children operated on for ARMs or Hirschsprung diseases. Multiple behavioural, medical and surgical interventions are available to lessen the severity of faecal incontinence and its impact on the daily life of affected individuals. Recent advances offer hope for children with faecal incontinence.

Prevalence of faecal incontinence in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Severity and its relationship with quality of life.

To describe the prevalence of faecal incontinence in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, assess its severity, and correlation with quality of life. We adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, STROBE method. Correlational-descriptive study. Hebrew-speaking patients seen at an inflammatory bowel disease clinic in a large tertiary medical center in Jerusalem between February 2020 and December 2020 completed the Faecal Incontinence Severity Index and the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. Ninety-six patients participated in the study, of which 70 (72.9%) had Crohn's disease, and 26 (27.1%) had ulcerative colitis. Eighty-five (88.5%) reported faecal incontinence with an overall Faecal Incontinence Severity Index mean of 27.66 (SD 15.99), yet only 14 (14.7%) reported that their physician or nurse inquired about faecal incontinence. Quality of life scores for patients with faecal incontinence was the lowest on the coping/behaviour scale (M = 2.44; SD 0.94) and the highest on the depression/self-perception scale (M = 2.86; SD 1.04). Significant correlations were found between faecal incontinence severity and quality of life in all scales except for self-embarrassment. Moderate correlations in the same scales were noted in patients with Ulcerative Colitis, while no significant correlations were found in the Crohn's Disease group. A high proportion of inflammatory bowel disease patients reported faecal incontinence associated with impaired quality of life. Only a few were questioned about faecal incontinence by their physician or nurse. There is limited literature regarding the prevalence and severity of faecal incontinence in inflammatory bowel disease patients. A high proportion of patients reported faecal incontinence, which negatively correlated with quality of life. Physicians and nurses must inquire about faecal incontinence to improve patient care. No patient or public contribution.

Subtotal fistulectomy and sliding anoderm flap: A new sphincter-sparing technique for anal fistula.

The underlying causes of failure or recurrence after ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract are postulated to be refistulization, breakdown of the closure wound in the intersphincteric plane and faecal contents entering the internal opening, thereby causing recurrent infection. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the outcomes of subtotal fistulectomy with sliding anoderm flaps to prevent refistulization. This retrospective study used prospectively collected data. Patients with transsphincteric or intersphincteric fistulas were enrolled between August 2021 and July 2023. An anal manometric study was performed before and after surgery. Faecal incontinence was evaluated using the faecal incontinence severity index (FISI). Failure was defined as nonhealing of the surgical wound or fistula. Fifty-one patients who underwent subtotal fistulectomy with a sliding anoderm flap were included. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 4-27 months), primary healing was achieved in 49 patients (96%). Two patients experienced treatment failure, while none developed postoperative recurrence. The median healing time was 10 weeks (range 6-24 weeks). The FISI scores did not change significantly after the surgery. The median resting pressure significantly reduced after surgery [125 cmH2O (range 59-204 cmH2O) vs. 99 cmH2O (range 36-176 cmH2O); p = 0.0001]. The median squeeze pressure significantly decreased after surgery [356 cmH2O (range 137-579 cmH2O) vs. 329 cmH2O (range 72-594 cmH2O; p = 0.005)]. Subtotal fistulectomy with a sliding anoderm flap showed excellent healing rates with no postoperative deterioration of anal function.

Enhanced Approach to Treating Chronic Anal Fissures: Fissurectomy with Vertical Non-full-thickness Midline Sphincterotomy and Mucosal Advancement Flap.

Lateral internal sphincterotomy is a conventional surgical intervention for chronic anal fissures, yet the potential for postoperative anal incontinence underscores the need for an alternative approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with chronic fissures who underwent a combination of fissurectomy, vertical non-full thickness midline sphincterotomy (VNMS), and mucosal advancement flap (MAF), as a means of mitigating the risk of incontinence. This retrospective analysis included forty-six consecutive patients with chronic anal fissures, unresponsive to topical diltiazem, who underwent fissurectomy combined with VNMS and MAF between April 2018 and May 2023. Primary outcome measures encompassed fissure healing rates. Continence was assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and manometric assessments were conducted before the procedure and three months postoperatively. With a median follow-up of 27 months, there were no postoperative complications, and the overall fissure healing rate reached 96% (44/46). At three months post-procedure, FISI scores were reduced to 0, with no instances of fecal soiling. Anal resting pressure exhibited a significant reduction at 3 months [pre-op: 133 (95% CI, 128-150) vs. 3 mo: 109 (95% CI, 100-117) cmH2O; p = 0.01]. Similarly, maximum anal squeeze pressure showed a significant decrease three months post-surgery [pre-op: 317 cmH2O (95% CI, 294-380) vs. 3 mo: 291 cmH2O (95% CI, 276-359), p = 0.03]. The combination of fissurectomy, VNMS, and MAF proved to be an effective approach for chronic anal fissures, yielding favorable medium-term outcomes without postoperative anal incontinence.

Dietary Intake and Symptom Severity in Women with Fecal Incontinence

Introduction and HypothesisThe goal of this study was to determine whether dietary fat/fiber intake was associated with fecal incontinence (FI) severity.MethodsPlanned supplemental analysis of a randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of 12-week treatment with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham in reducing FI severity in women. All subjects completed a food screener questionnaire at baseline. FI severity was measured using the seven-item validated St. Mark’s (Vaizey) FI severity scale. Participants also completed a 7-day bowel diary capturing the number of FI-free days, FI events, and bowel movements per week. Spearman’s correlations were calculated between dietary, St. Mark’s score, and bowel diary measures.ResultsOne hundred and eighty-six women were included in this analysis. Mean calories from fats were 32% (interquartile range [IQR] 30–35%). Mean dietary fiber intake was 13.9 ± 4.3 g. The percentage of calories from fats was at the higher end of recommended values, whereas fiber intake was lower than recommended for adult women (recommended values: calories from fat 20–35% and 22–28 g of fiber/day). There was no correlation between St. Mark’s score and fat intake (r = 0.11, p = 0.14) or dietary fiber intake (r = −0.01, p = 0.90). There was a weak negative correlation between the number of FI-free days and total fat intake (r = −0.20, p = 0.008). Other correlations between dietary fat/fiber intake and bowel diary measures were negligible or nonsignificant.ConclusionOverall, in women with moderate to severe FI, there was no association between FI severity and dietary fat/fiber intake. Weak associations between FI frequency and fat intake may suggest a role for dietary assessment in the evaluation of women with FI.

Faecal incontinence with concurrent disorders of gut-brain interaction: A worse outcome.

Faecal incontinence is a common debilitating condition associated with poor quality of life that generates substantial economic strain on healthcare systems. We aimed to evaluate, in a tertiary referral population presenting with faecal incontinence, the impact of suffering additional disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) on symptom severity, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary referral Neurogastroenterology centre. All patients presenting with faecal incontinence from 2007 to 2020 were included. The results from structured medical and surgical questionnaires including Rome III Integrative Questionnaire, Faecal Incontinence Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SF-36, and anorectal physiology were analysed using Stata version 17. Patients were categorised into 3 groups: 0-1 additional DGBI, 2 DGBIs, and 3+ DGBI. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05 (two-tailed). Faecal incontinence patients (n=249; mean age 63.4±12.6years; 93.6% female, 48.1% urge subtype) met diagnostic criteria for mean 2.2 additional DGBI each, mostly affecting bowel (n=231, 42.4%) and anorectal (n=150, 27.5%) regions. A greater number of DGBIs was associated with higher faecal incontinence symptom severity (p<0.001), higher anxiety (p=0.002) and depression (p=0.003), and worse quality of life in areas of mental health (p=0.037) and social effect (p<0.001). Patients with a greater number of concurrent DGBI demonstrated a greater family history of gastrointestinal problems (p=0.004). There were no associations found between a greater amount of DGBIs and anorectal physiology. A greater number of additional DGBIs in faecal incontinence patients was associated with worse faecal incontinence symptoms, higher anxiety and depression scores, and worse quality of life but was unrelated to physiology. This highlights the need to proactively search for comorbid DGBI in patients presenting with faecal incontinence.

Long-term clinical outcomes after high and low ligations with lymph node dissection around the root of the inferior mesenteric artery in patients with rectal cancer.

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes based on the ligation level of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in patients with rectal cancer. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database that included all patients who underwent elective low anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. The clinical outcomes included oncological outcomes, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes. The oncological outcomes included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The functional outcomes, including defecatory and urogenital functions, were analyzed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, International Prostate Symptom Score, and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires. In total, 545 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 244 patients underwent high ligation (HL), whereas 301 underwent low ligation (LL). The tumor size was larger in the HL group than in the LL group. The number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) was higher in the HL group than in the LL group. There were no significant differences in complication rates and recurrence patterns between the groups. There were no significant differences in 5-year RFS and OS between the groups. Cox regression analysis revealed that the ligation level (HL vs. LL) was not a significant risk factor for oncological outcomes. Regarding functional outcomes, the LL group showed a significant recovery in defecatory function 1 year postoperatively compared with the HL group. LL with LNs dissection around the root of the IMA might not affect the oncologic outcomes comparing to HL; however, it has minimal benefit for defecatory function.

MEDICAL, ENDOSCOPIC, AND SURGICAL THERAPIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF RECTAL CUFFITIS IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS WITH AN ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) without mucosectomy are left with a rectal cuff, which can develop inflammation known as cuffitis. Treatment of cuffitis typically includes mesalamine suppositories or corticosteroids, but individuals with refractory cuffitis may require advanced therapies, endoscopic intervention, or surgical intervention. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing literature regarding treatments options for cuffitis. METHODS A broad search strategy was created by a medical librarian to capture rectal cuffitis in IPAA patients. The following databases were searched: Ovid Medline® ALL, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley), and 3 indexes in Web of Science from Clarivate: Science Citation Index-Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, and BIOSIS Citation Index. A total of 1,652 citations were identified, and 836 studies remained after removal of 816 duplicates. Two reviewers screened all 836 abstracts and 241 full-text articles to determine if they were eligible for inclusion in this review. RESULTS A total of 21 studies (10 cohort studies, 9 case-series, 2 open-label clinical trials) met the inclusion criteria. Medical interventions were investigated in 15 studies (Table 1) with mesalamine being the most common (4 studies) followed by corticosteroids (3 studies), ustekinumab (3 studies), vedolizumab (2 studies), tofacitinib (1 study), and infliximab (1 study). Studies investigating mesalamine and corticosteroid use generally had larger sample sizes (ranging 4-120 patients) and showed symptomatic improvement in 51.7-100% of patients and decreases of 1.14-1.8 points in endoscopic disease activity indices. In contrast, studies investigating advanced therapies had small sample sizes (ranging 1-21 patients) and showed variable responses ranging from no clinical (tofacitinib) or endoscopic (ustekinumab, vedolizumab) improvements to clinical (ustekinumab) or endoscopic (vedolizumab) responses in 75% of patients. Endoscopic and surgical approaches were explored in 6 studies (Table 2) and included secondary mucosectomy (2 studies), endoscopic cuff resection, transanal minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic needle-knife therapy, and balloon dilation for cuffitis patients with concomitant outlet strictures (1 study each). These techniques generally resulted in resolution of symptoms but were limited by small sample sizes (ranging 3-16 patients). CONCLUSIONS Most studies evaluating therapies used to treat rectal cuffitis suggest beneficial effects of conventional mesalamine or corticosteroid-based therapies, whereas data regarding the efficacy of advanced therapies and interventional procedures are inconsistent given small sample sizes. Further research is needed to effectively characterize additional management options for this condition. Table 1. Medical therapies used for treatment of cuffitis. Abbreviations – BM: bowel movements, CRP: C-reactive protein, UST: ustekinumab, HBOT: hyperbaric oxygen therapy, mPDAI: modified Pouch Disease Activity Index, 5-ASA: 5-aminosalicylate, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PDAI: Pouch Disease Activity Index, CGQOL: Cleveland Global Quality of Life score, IPS: Irritable Pouch Syndrome, CAI: Cuffitis Activity Index. Table 2. Endoscopic and surgical therapies used for treatment of cuffitis. Abbreviations – FISI: Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, CGQOL: Cleveland Global Quality of Life score, PDAI: Pouch Disease Activity Index, BM: bowel movements.

Irritable bowel syndrome worsens faecal incontinence after primary repair of major obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) occur in approximately 3%-6% of vaginal deliveries and are the leading risk factor for late-onset faecal incontinence, which is an underdiagnosed pathology. The aim of this work was to use a validated scoring system to quantify the effect of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on the severity of faecal incontinence symptoms after primary repair of major OASIS (Grade IIIb-IV). A prospective cohort study was performed on all women who underwent primary repair of major OASIS over a 6-year period. They were assessed with ultrasonography within 12 weeks. Two control groups (who did not have OASIS) were women who underwent elective caesarean section and primigravid women. Questionnaires were sent at least 12 months after delivery, or at first consultation for primigravids, which generated the main outcome measures: Cleveland Clinic faecal incontinence severity scores and the presence of IBS based on Rome III criteria. There was a total of 211 patients included in the three groups and the mean follow-up time was 26 months after sphincter repair. Ultrasonographic sphincter defects were detected in 37% but did not affect the faecal incontinence score (p = 0.47), except in patients with IBS. Within each group, patients with IBS had significantly worse faecal incontinence than those without. Women with both OASIS and IBS had the most severe faecal incontinence scores. OASIS has a limited negative effect on faecal incontinence, independent of whether residual ultrasonographic sphincter defects are present. However, the presence of IBS has a significant compounding effect on faecal incontinence in OASIS patients. The effect of IBS on faecal incontinence is also notable in caesarean section patients and primigravids, suggesting that IBS is an independent risk-factor that should have its place in predelivery assessment and counselling.

Long-term outcome after SphinKeeper® surgery for treating fecal incontinence—who are good candidates?

PurposeThe efficacy of the novel SphinKeeper® procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) is not yet well defined. This study aimed to assess long-term functional outcomes after SphinKeeper® surgery.MethodsWe included 32 patients with FI (28 female), who were operated at a tertiary referral center between August 2018 and September 2021. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated prospectively using validated questionnaires before and after surgery. Additionally, endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry were conducted prior and after SphinKeeper® implantation. Predictive parameters for treatment success were defined.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 22.62 ± 8.82 months. The St. Mark’s incontinence score decreased significantly after surgery (median preoperative = 19 (IQR 17–22) versus median last follow-up = 12 (IQR 8–16), p = 0.001). Similarly, physical short-form health survey showed a significant improvement after SphinKeeper® implantation (p = 0.011).Patients with a higher degree of internal sphincter defect showed an improved objective therapy success (r = 0.633, p = 0.015) after SphinKeeper® operation, whereas the type and severity of FI had no impact on the functional outcome. Notably, a higher number of dislocated prostheses (r = 0.772, p = 0.015) showed a significant correlation with reduced improvement of incontinence.ConclusionThe SphinKeeper® procedure showed a significant long-term functional improvement in over half of the patients. Patients with a higher internal sphincter defect benefited most, whereas dislocation of the prostheses was associated with less favorable results.

Increased Grades of Rectal Intussusception: Role of Decline in Pelvic Floor Integrity and Association With Dyssynergic Defecation.

The natural history of rectal intussusception (RI) is poorly understood. We hypothesized that decline in pelvic floor integrity and function leads to increasing RI grades. Retrospective analysis of a registry of patients with defecatory disorders with high-resolution anorectal manometry and magnetic resonance defecography was performed. Association of risk factors on increasing RI grades was assessed using logistic regression. Analysis included a total of 238 women: 90 had no RI, 43 Oxford 1-2, 49 Oxford 3, and 56 Oxford 4-5. Age ( P = 0.017), vaginal delivery ( P = 0.008), and prior pelvic surgery ( P = 0.032) were associated with increased Oxford grades. Obstructive defecation symptoms and dyssynergic defecation were observed at relatively high rates across groups. Increased RI grades were associated with less anal relaxation at simulated defecation yet, higher rates of normal balloon expulsion ( P < 0.05), linked to diminished anal sphincter. Indeed, increased RI grades were associated with worsening fecal incontinence severity, attributed to higher rates of anal hypotension. Levator ani laxity, defined by increased levator hiatus length and its excessive descent at straining, was associated with increasing RI grades, independent of age, history of vaginal delivery, and pelvic surgeries and could independently predict increased RI grades. Concurrent anterior and posterior compartments, and visceral prolapse were associated with higher Oxford grades. Our data suggest that decline in pelvic floor integrity with abnormal levator ani laxity is associated with increased RI grades, a process that is independent of age, history of vaginal deliveries, and/or pelvic surgeries, and perhaps related to dyssynergic defecation.

The Severity of Fecal Problems Is Negatively Associated With Quality of Life in a Dutch Population Without Bowel Function Comorbidities.

Constipation and fecal incontinence negatively influence quality of life. The association between the severity of fecal problems and quality of life has not been investigated in the general population without bowel function comorbidities. To investigate the association between the severity of constipation and fecal incontinence and quality of life in patients without comorbidities influencing bowel function. A population-based, cross-sectional study. The study involved 3668 Dutch study participants. A survey company conducted a population-wide study of the general Dutch population. Altogether, 5000 Dutch citizens completed the Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence and Short Form-36 questionnaires. The data on 3668 respondents without comorbidities that could influence bowel function were included for analysis (study group). The severity of constipation (Agachan score) and fecal incontinence (Wexner score) in relation to the quality-of-life scores. In the study group (n = 3668), 487 had constipation (13.3%), 116 had fecal incontinence (3.2%), and 64 had 2 coexisting fecal problems (1.7%). In the multivariable analysis, all quality-of-life domains were negatively associated with the severity of constipation and fecal incontinence. The associations between the severity of constipation and quality of life were stronger (highest: ß = -2.413; 95% CI, -2.681 to -2.145; p < 0.001) than those of fecal incontinence (highest: ß = -1.280; 95% CI, -1.681 to -.880; p < 0.001). We also found that a longer duration of bowel complaints coincided with higher severity scores, especially for constipation. Respondents mostly rated their defecation health as positive, regardless of the severity of their fecal problems. Cross-sectional design. The severity of constipation and fecal incontinence is significantly associated with reduced quality of life, with the severity of constipation having stronger associations than fecal incontinence. Given respondents' unawareness of their fecal problems and the progressive character, timely intervention is advocated. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:El estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal influyen negativamente en la calidad de vida. La asociación entre la gravedad de los problemas fecales y la calidad de vida no se ha investigado en la población general sin comorbilidades de la función intestinal.OBJETIVO:Investigar la asociación entre la gravedad del estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal y la calidad de vida en la población holandesa general sin comorbilidades que influyan en la función intestinal.DISEÑO:Estudio transversal de base poblacional.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio involucró a 3668 participantes holandeses.PACIENTES:Una empresa de encuestas realizó un estudio poblacional de la población holandesa en general. En total, 5.000 ciudadanos holandeses completaron los cuestionarios Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence y Short-Form 36. Se incluyeron para el análisis los datos de 3668 encuestados sin comorbilidades que pudieran influir en la función intestinal (grupo de estudio).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La gravedad del estreñimiento (puntuación de Agachan) y la incontinencia fecal (puntuación de Wexner) en relación con las puntuaciones de calidad de vida.RESULTADOS:En el grupo de estudio (n = 3668), 487 tenían estreñimiento (13,3%), 116 tenían incontinencia fecal (3,2%) y 64 tenían 2 problemas fecales coexistentes (1,7%). En el análisis multivariable, todos los dominios de calidad de vida se asociaron negativamente con la gravedad del estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal. Las asociaciones entre la gravedad del estreñimiento y la calidad de vida fueron más fuertes (más alta: ß = -2,413; IC del 95 %, -2,681 a -2,145; p < 0,001) que las de la incontinencia fecal (más alta: ß = -1,280; 95 IC %: -1,681 a -0,880; p < 0,001). También encontramos que una mayor duración de las molestias intestinales coincidió con puntuaciones de gravedad más altas, especialmente para el estreñimiento. La mayoría de los encuestados calificaron su salud en la defecación como positiva, independientemente de la gravedad de sus problemas fecales.LIMITACIONES:Diseño transversal.CONCLUSIONES:La gravedad del estreñimiento y la incontinencia fecal se asocia significativamente con una calidad de vida reducida; la gravedad del estreñimiento tiene asociaciones más fuertes que la incontinencia fecal. Dado el desconocimiento de los encuestados sobre sus problemas fecales y el carácter progresivo, se recomienda una intervención oportuna. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Sacral neuromodulation in the golden years: Treatment outcomes in elderly 75 years and older.

Despite high prevalence and increased severity and burden of overactive bladder (OAB) and fecal incontinence (FI) in the elderly, sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is often overlooked as a potential treatment option for this demographic. In this study, we report the outcomes of SNM in patients aged 75 years or older at the time of surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent SNM implantation between 2013 and 2022 performed by a single, high-volume urologist at a tertiary center. Success, complication, and adjunct therapy rates were analyzed by Fisher's or Wilcox rank-sum test as appropriate. We compared outcomes between patients aged 75-79 years and octogenarians. Of 632 patients, 50 were ≥75 years. Patients had a mean age of 78.4±2.6 years and were predominantly female (84%). The indications for SNM were 66% OAB, 16% FI, 16% non-obstructive urinary retention, and 4% pelvic pain. Within the first year, 94% of patients reported satisfaction and improvement in symptoms, while 76% continued to experience improvement beyond one year. SNM insertion led to reduced oral medication use from 68% to 24% (p<0.0001). The complication rate was 16% and mostly included device pain. No significant difference was observed in treatment success, complication, or adjunct therapy rate between age groups. SNM is a safe and effective option in well-selected patients over the age of 75 years. Treatment success rate is comparable to younger cohorts. Advanced age should not preclude third-line therapy options in this population.

Clinical utility of trans-sacral magnetic stimulation-evoked sphincter potentials and high-density electromyography in pelvic floor assessment: Technical evaluation.

Faecal incontinence is common and of multifactorial aetiologies, yet current diagnostic tools are unable to assess nerve and sphincter function objectively. We developed an anorectal high-density electromyography (HD-EMG) probe to evaluate motor-evoked potentials induced via trans-sacral magnetic stimulation (TSMS). Anorectal probes with an 8 × 8 array of electrodes spaced 1 cm apart were developed for recording HD-EMG of the external anal sphincter. These HD-EMG probes were used to map MEP amplitudes and latencies evoked via TSMS delivered through the Magstim Rapid2 (MagStim Company). Patients undergoing pelvic floor investigations were recruited for this IDEAL Stage 2a pilot study. Eight participants (median age 49 years; five female) were recruited. Methodological viability, safety and diagnostic workflow were established. The test was well tolerated with median discomfort scores ≤2.5/10, median pain scores ≤1/10 and no adverse events. Higher Faecal Incontinence Severity Index scores correlated with longer MEP latencies (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) and lower MEP amplitudes (r = -0.32, p = 0.046), as did St. Mark's Incontinence Scores with both MEP latencies (r = 0.49, p = 0.001) and MEP amplitudes (r = -0.47, p = 0.002). This HD-EMG probe in conjunction with TSMS presents a novel diagnostic tool for anorectal function assessment. Spatiotemporal assessment of magnetically stimulated MEPs correlated well with symptoms and offers a feasible, safe and patient-tolerable method of evaluating pudendal nerve and external anal sphincter function. Further clinical development and evaluation of these techniques is justified.

Does Length of Extended Resection Beyond Transition Zone Change Clinical Outcome for Hirschsprung Pull-Through?

IntroductionA proximal resection margin greater than 5 cm from the intra-operative histologically determined transition zone has been deemed necessary to minimize the risk of transition zone pull-through. This extended resection may require the sacrifice of vascular supply and even further bowel resection. The impact of extended proximal resection margin on post-operative complications and functional outcomes is unclear. MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent primary pull-through for Hirschsprung disease at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2022 was performed. An adequate proximal margin was defined by a circumferential normally ganglionated ring and absence of hypertrophic nerves. The extended margin was defined as the total length of proximal colon with normal ganglion cells and without hypertrophic nerves. Fecal incontinence severity was assessed with the Pediatric Fecal Incontinence Severity Score (PFISS). ResultsEighty seven patients met criteria for inclusion. Median age at primary pull-through was 17 days (IQR 10–92 days), 55% (n = 48) of patients had an extended proximal margin (EPM) ≤ 5 cm, and 45% (n = 39) had an EPM > 5 cm. An EPM ≤5 cm was not associated with increased rates of Hirschsprung associated enterocolitis (≤5 cm 43%, >5 cm 39%, P = 0.701), diversion post pull-through (≤5 cm 10%, >5 cm 5%, P = 0.367) or reoperation for transition zone pull-through (≤5 cm 3%, >5 cm 0%, P = 0.112). EPM ≤5 cm had more frequent involuntary daytime bowel movements (P = 0.041) and more frequent voluntary bowel movements (P = 0.035). There were no differences in other measures of fecal incontinence severity. ConclusionsShorter proximal extended margins beyond the adequate ganglionated margin do not significantly impact post-operative complication rates and have an unclear effect on fecal incontinence. Type of StudyCase Control. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Effects of TENS and Physiotherapy on Chronic Constipation in Myelomeningocele

Background: Chronic constipation is a common symptom of myelomeningoceles. TENS has been proven to be effective in treating constipation in different populations and parameters. Physiotherapy is a relatively recent treatment for constipation and has not been extensively studied in pediatrics and spina bifida. This study aimed to examine the role of TENS in myelomeningocele and to increase the number of studies on physiotherapy for pediatric constipation. &#x0D; Aims: To determine a new treatment approach that can be applied in chronic constipation in children with spina bifida using physical therapy techniques.&#x0D; Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial &#x0D; Methods: Constipation symptoms, stool pattern, bladder and bowel dysfunction, muscle strength involved in defecation, pressure pain thresholds (ppt) in these muscles, severity of fecal incontinence, and quality of life were assessed prior to treatment. Physical Therapy (PT) group received manual physical therapy techniques and dietary therapy for six weeks while the Physical Therapy and TENS (PT+T) group also received TENS. The post-treatment evaluations were repeated.&#x0D; Results: A total of 28 children, 14 in each group, were included in the treatment plan. The stool form in both groups of children was constipated. There was a significant difference in stool pattern only PT+T group (p