ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with self-expanding (SEV) valve versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV), with a minimum follow-up period of five years. Materials and Methods Utilizing a prospectively maintained database, this observational study identified patients who underwent TAVI using either SEV or BEV for severe aortic stenosis and were followed for at least five years. Clinical outcomes encompassed both 30-day post-TAVI outcomes and long-term outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, structural valve deterioration (SVD), heart failure related hospitalization, bioprosthetic valve failure, and valve related hospitalization and complications. Results A total of 74 patients were included in this study, with 64 patients in the SEV group and 10 patients in the BEV group. The median follow-up duration was 6.8 years, ranging from 5.0 to 10.2 years. Throughout the post-TAVI period, the SEV group consistently demonstrated a lower mean pressure gradient than the BEV group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of short-term or long-term outcomes. Within the study, four patients encountered moderate or severe SVD and one experienced thrombosis, and no cases of bioprosthetic valve failure or endocarditis were observed. Conclusions This study revealed that SEV and BEV demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI, including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as the risk of SVD.
Read full abstract