Respiratory viruses are the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and hospitalisation in infants and young children. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main infectious agent in this population.Palivizumab is administered intramuscularly every month during five months in the first RSV season to prevent serious RSV LRTI in children.Given its high cost, it is essential to know if palivizumab continues to be effective in preventing severe RSV disease in children. To assess the effects of palivizumab for preventing severe RSV infection in children. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, threeotherdatabases and two trialsregistersto 14 October 2021,together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We searched Embase to October 2020, as we did not have access to this database for 2021. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-RCTs,comparing palivizumabgiven at a dose of 15 mg/kg once a month (maximum five doses) with placebo, no intervention or standard care in children 0 to 24 months of agefrom both genders, regardless ofRSV infection history. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used Cochrane's Screen4Me workflow to help assess the search results.Two review authors screened studies for selection, assessed risk of bias and extracted data.We used standard Cochrane methods.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.The primary outcomes were hospitalisation due to RSV infection, all-cause mortality and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness, length of hospital stay,RSV infection, number of wheezing days, days of supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit length of stay and mechanical ventilation days. We included five studies with a total of 3343 participants.All studies were parallel RCTs, assessing the effects of 15 mg/kg of palivizumabevery month up to five months compared to placebo or no intervention in an outpatient setting, although one study also included hospitalised infants. Most of the included studies were conducted in children with a high risk of RSV infection due to comorbidities like bronchopulmonary dysplasia and congenital heart disease. The risk of bias of outcomes across all studies was similar and predominately low. Palivizumabreduceshospitalisation due to RSV infectionat two years' follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.64;5 studies, 3343 participants; high certainty evidence). Based on 98 hospitalisations per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 43 (29 to 62) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in mortalityat two years' follow-up (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.15;5 studies, 3343 participants;moderate certainty evidence). Based on 23 deaths per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 16 (10 to 27) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events at 150 days' follow-up (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.39;3 studies, 2831 participants;moderate certainty evidence). Based on 84 cases per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 91 (71 to 117) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in a slight reductionin hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness at two years' follow-up (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97;5 studies, 3343participants; moderate certainty evidence). Palivizumabmay result in a large reductionin RSV infection at two years' follow-up (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55;3 studies, 554participants;low certainty evidence). Based on 195 cases of RSV infection per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 64 (39 to 107) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab also reduces thenumber of wheezing days at one year's follow-up (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.44;1 study, 429 participants; high certainty evidence). The available evidence suggests that prophylaxis with palivizumabreduceshospitalisation due to RSV infection and results in little to no difference in mortality oradverse events. Moreover, palivizumabresults in a slight reductionin hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness and may result in a large reductionin RSV infections. Palivizumabalso reduces thenumber of wheezing days. These results may be applicable to children with a high risk of RSV infection due to comorbidities. Further research is needed to establish the effect of palivizumabon children with other comorbidities known as risk factors for severe RSV disease (e.g. immune deficiencies) and other social determinants of the disease, including children living in low- and middle-income countries, tropical regions, childrenlacking breastfeeding, living inpoverty, or members of families in overcrowded situations.
Read full abstract