Severe Lower Extremity Injuries Research Articles

Quality of Life After Lower Leg Reconstruction With the Latissimus Dorsi Free Flap in Pediatric Patients.

The latissimus dorsi free flap is a widely used reconstructive technique for complex lower leg defects in the pediatric population due to its reliability and anatomical features. However, the impact of this technique on the postoperative quality of life in children and adolescents, who require appropriate lower extremity function during their developmental period, remains to be analyzed. Patients who underwent microsurgical lower leg reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi flap were analyzed retrospectively. The quality of life of these patients was assessed prospectively using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) at a minimum of 18 months after surgical reconstruction. Sixteen pediatric patients who had severe lower extremity injuries and underwent latissimus dorsi free flap reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 33.9 months (22-64 months). Two patients experienced postoperative complications: one had partial flap necrosis and surgical site infection, while the other developed a surgical site infection. The LEFS scores ranged from 26 to 80, with a mean score of 64.6. Remarkably, 14 of 16 patients achieved LEFS scores consistent with at least the 10th percentile when compared with normative data. Patients with severe associated fractures presented with the lowest scores. Based on our findings, the latissimus dorsi flap is reaffirmed to be an excellent choice for lower leg reconstruction in the pediatric population. It effectively restores the quality of life in patients who have experienced moderate to severe lower extremity injuries.

Do Transtibial Amputations Outperform Amputations of the Hind- and Midfoot Following Severe Limb Trauma?: A Secondary Analysis of the OUTLET Study.

The purpose of this study was to compare 18-month clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients with severe lower-limb injuries treated with a transtibial amputation or a hind- or midfoot amputation. Despite the theoretical benefits of hind- and midfoot-level amputation, we hypothesized that patients with transtibial amputations would report better function and have fewer complications. The study included patients 18 to 60 years of age who were treated with a transtibial amputation (n = 77) or a distal amputation (n = 17) and who were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Foot Trauma (OUTLET) study. The primary outcome was the difference in Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores, and secondary outcomes included pain, complications, amputation revision, and amputation healing. There were no significant differences between patients with distal versus transtibial amputation in any of the domains of the SMFA: dysfunction index [distal versus transtibial], 31.2 versus 22.3 (p = 0.13); daily activities, 37.3 versus 26.0 (p = 0.17); emotional status, 41.4 versus 29.3 (p = 0.07); mobility, 36.5 versus 27.8 (p = 0.20); and bother index, 34.4 versus 23.6 (p = 0.14). Rates of complications requiring revision were higher for distal amputations but not significantly so (23.5% versus 13.3%; p = 0.28). One distal and no transtibial amputees required revision to a higher level (p = 0.18). A higher proportion of patients with distal compared with transtibial amputation required local surgical revision (17.7% versus 13.3%; p = 0.69). There was no significant difference between the distal and transtibial groups in scores on the Brief Pain Index at 18 months post-injury. Surgical complication rates did not differ significantly between patients who underwent transtibial versus hind- or midfoot amputation for severe lower-extremity injury. The average SMFA scores were higher (worse), although not significantly different, for patients undergoing distal compared with transtibial amputation, and more patients with distal amputation had a complication requiring surgical revision. Of note, more patients with distal amputation required closure with an atypical flap, which likely contributed to less favorable outcomes. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors associated with pediatric trauma patients leaving against medical advice

BackgroundDischarge against medical advice (AMA) leads to worse patient outcomes, increased readmission rates, and higher cost. However, AMA discharge has received limited study, particularly in pediatric trauma patients. Our objective was to explore the risk factors associated with leaving AMA in pediatric trauma patients. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis on pediatric trauma patients from 2017 to 2019 using the National Trauma Data Bank. We examined patient characteristics including age (<18 years), race, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, trauma type, primary payment methods, and Abbreviated Injury Scale. Multiple Logistic Regression models were utilized to determine characteristics associated with leaving AMA. ResultsOf the 224,196 pediatric patients included in the study, 238 left AMA (0.1%). Our study showed black pediatric trauma patients were more likely to leave AMA compared to nonblack patients (OR 1.987, 95% CI 1.501 to 2.631). Patients with self-pay coverage were more likely to leave AMA than those with other insurance coverages (OR 1.759, 95% CI 1.183 to 2.614). Blunt trauma patients were more likely to leave AMA than those with penetrating trauma (OR 1.683, 95% CI 1.216 to 2.330). Every one-year increase in age led to 15% increase in odds of AMA discharge (OR 1.150, 95% CI 1.115 to 1.186). Pediatric patients with severe abdominal injuries were less likely to leave AMA compared to those with mild abdominal injuries (OR 0.271, 95% CI 0.111 to 0.657). Patients with severe lower extremity injury were less likely to leave AMA compared to those with mild lower extremity injuries (OR 0.258, 95% CI 0.127 to 0.522). ConclusionRace, insurance, injury type, and age play a role in AMA discharge of pediatric trauma patients. Black pediatric trauma patients have ∼ double the AMA discharge rate of nonblack patients. AMA discharge remains relevant, and addressing racial and socioeconomic factors provide opportunities for future interventions in pediatric trauma care.Level of Evidence: III, retrospective study.

Use of MatriDerm with Split-Thickness Skin Graft in Post-traumatic Full-Thickness Wound Defects in Orthopedic Cases: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature.

The management of complex and severe lower-extremity injuries is challenging for the orthopedic surgeon. When the primary or secondary closure of the defect is not feasible, complex procedures with graft (split-thickness or full-thickness) or flap (pedicled or free) are required. These procedures are performed by specialized plastic surgeons and are at high risk for adverse effects, even high morbidity among both the donor and acceptor sites. Furthermore, split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) often lead to unsatisfactory results in terms of mechanical stability, flexibility, and aesthetics due to the lack of underlying dermal tissue. Consequently, dermal substitutes, such as MatriDerm (MedSkin Solutions Dr Suwelack AG, Billerbeck, Germany), have been proposed and further developed as a treatment option addressing the management of full-thickness wound defects in conjunction with STSGs. We aimed to present a case of post-traumatic full-thickness wound defect of the left foot after traumatic amputation of the digits that was treated with MatriDerm combined with autologous STSG. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature to delineate the efficacy of the use of MatriDerm combined with STSGs in orthopedic cases exclusively.

A study on the cyclist lower extremity injury risk by using German in-depth accident data

The lower extremities of cyclists are the most vulnerable body parts in vehicle-bicycle traffic accidents. However, few studies have been conducted on the effects of vehicle front-end profile parameters on cyclist lower extremity injuries by using real accident data. This paper aimed to explore the correlation between the cyclist’s severe lower extremity injury (AIS2+) risk and impact speed, vehicle front-end profile variables, and cyclist parameters via using real cyclist accidents. A subsample of 390 cyclist accident cases with lower extremity injuries was selected from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) to conduct statistical analysis. Furthermore, an independent samples t-test was performed to analyse the associations between the selected predictive parameters and the risk of cyclists with AIS2+ lower extremity injuries. Finally, the risk function for cyclists with AIS2+ lower extremity injuries was developed by using the logistic regression method. The research results indicated that vehicle impact speed, lower bumper height (LBH), bumper depth (BD), cyclist age, and weight were statistically significant factors for cyclists with AIS2+ lower extremity injuries. The higher vehicle speed, higher LBH and BD corresponded to a greater likelihood of the cyclist suffering an AIS2+ lower extremity injury. These findings contribute to developing more effective safety measures for vehicle front designs and establishing regulations to protect the lower extremities of cyclists.

Does Lower Extremity Fracture Fixation Technique Influence Neurologic Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury? The EAST Brain vs. Bone Multicenter Trial.

To determine whether lower extremity (LE) fracture fixation technique & timing (≤ 24 vs > 24 hours) impact neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. A prospective observational study was conducted across 30 trauma centers. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18, head abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score > 2, and a diaphyseal femur or tibia fracture requiring external fixation (Ex-Fix), intramedullary nailing (IMN) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The analysis was conducted using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and multivariable regression models. Neurologic outcomes were measured by discharge Ranchos Los Amigos Revised Score (RLAS-R). Of the 520 patients enrolled, 358 underwent Ex-Fix, IMN or ORIF as definitive management. Head AIS was similar among cohorts. The Ex-Fix group experienced more severe LE injuries (AIS 4-5) compared to the IMN group (16% vs 3%, p = 0.01) but not the ORIF group (16% vs. 6%, p = 0.1). Time to operative intervention varied between the cohorts with the longest time to intervention for the IMN group (median hours: Ex-Fix 15 [8-24] vs. ORIF 26 [12-85] vs. IMN 31[12-70], p < 0.001). The discharge RLAS-R score distribution was similar across the groups. After adjusting for confounders, neither method nor timing of LE fixation influenced the discharge RLAS-R. Instead, increasing age and head AIS score were associated with a lower discharge RLAS-R score (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.002-1.03 and OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.75-3.22) and a higher GCS motor score on admission (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73,0.97) was associated with higher RLAS-R score at discharge. Neurologic outcomes in TBI are impacted by severity of the head injury and not the fracture fixation technique or timing. Therefore, the strategy of definitive fixation of LE fractures should be dictated by patient physiology and the anatomy of the injured extremity and not by the concern for worsening neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. Level III (Prognostic/Epidemiological).

Pulmonary embolism following severe polytrauma: a retrospective study from a level I trauma center in China.

Trauma patients are at high risk of Venous thromboembolism (VTE), but compared to well-established deep venous thrombosis (DVT), data specifically evaluating post-traumatic pulmonary embolism (PE) are scarce. The aim of this study is to assess whether PE represents a distinct clinical entity with injury pattern, risk factors, and prophylaxis strategy different from DVT, among severe poly-trauma patients. We retrospectively enrolled patients admitted to our level I trauma center from January 2011 to December 2021 who were diagnosed with severe multiple traumatic injuries and identified thromboembolic events among them. We regarded four groups as None (without thromboembolic events), DVT only, PE only, and PE with DVT. Demographics, injury characteristics, clinical outcomes, and treatments were collected and analyzed in individual groups. Patients were also classified according to the occurring time of PE, and indicative symptoms and radiological findings were compared between early PE (≤ 3days) and late PE (> 3days). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore independent risk factors for different VTE patterns. Among 3498 selected severe multiple traumatic patients, there were 398 episodes of DVT only, 19 of PE only, and 63 of PE with DVT. Injury variables associated with PE only included shock on admission and severe chest trauma. Severe pelvic fracture and mechanical ventilator days (MVD) ≥ 3 were the independent risk factors for PE with DVT. There were no significant differences in the indicative symptoms and location of pulmonary thrombi between the early and late PE groups. Obesity and severe lower extremity injury might have an impact on the incidence of early PE, while patients with a severe head injury and higher ISS are particularly at risk for developing late PE. Occurring early, lacking association with DVT, and possessing distinct risk factors warrant PE in severe poly-trauma patients special attention, especially for its prophylaxis strategy.

Amputation versus Reconstruction in Severe Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cases of severe lower limb injuries that previously were amenable only to amputation can now, in certain circumstances, be managed with reconstruction. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to compare the results of amputation and reconstruction in severe lower extremity injuries. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) were comprehensively searched for studies comparing amputation and reconstruction for severe lower extremity injuries. The search terms used were the following: "amputation", "reconstruction", "salvage", "lower limb", "lower extremity", and "mangled limb", "mangled extremity", "mangled foot". Two investigators screened eligible studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted the data from each study. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager Software (RevMan, Version 5.4). The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity. Fifteen studies with 2,732 patients were included. Amputation is associated with lower rehospitalization rates, lower length of stay in the hospital, lower number of operations and additional surgery and fewer cases of infection and osteomyelitis. Limb reconstruction leads to faster return to work and lower rates of depression. The outcomes with respect to function and pain are variable among the studies. Statistically significance was achieved only with regards to rehospitalization and infection rates. This meta-analysis suggests that amputation yields better outcomes in variables during the early postoperative period, while reconstruction is associated with improved outcomes in certain long-term parameters. Severe lower limb injuries should be managed on their individual merit. The results of this study may be a useful tool to aid in the decision-making for the treating surgeon. High-quality Randomized Controlled Studies are still required to further our conclusions.

Implementation of a major trauma team. Analysis of activation and care times in patients admitted to the ICU

ObjectiveTo analyze the factors associated with the activation of the severe trauma care team (STAT) in patients admitted to the ICU, to measure its impact on care times, and to analyze the groups of patients according to activation and level of anatomical involvement. DesignProspective cohort study of severe trauma admitted to the ICU. From June 2017 to May 2019. Risk factors for the activation of the STAT analysed with logistic regression and CART type classification tree. SettingSecond level hospital ICU. PatientsPatients admitted consecutively. InterventionsNo. Main variables of interestSTAT activation. Demographic variables. Injury severity (ISS), intentionality, mechanism, assistance times, evolutionary complications, and mortality. ResultsA total of 188 patients were admitted (46.8% of STAT activation), median age of 52 (37−64) years (activated 47 (27−62) vs not activated 55 (42−67) P = 0.023), males 84.0%. No difference in mortality according to activation. The logistic model finds as factors: care (16.6 (2.1−13.2)) and prehospital intubation (4.2 (1.8−9.8)) and severe lower extremity injury (4.4 (1.6−12.3)). Accidental fall (0.2 (0.1−0.6)) makes activation less likely. The CART model selects the type of trauma mechanism and can separate high and low energy trauma. ConclusionsFactors associated with STAT activation were prehospital care, requiring prior intubation, high-energy mechanisms, and severe lower extremity injuries. Shorter care times if activated without influencing mortality. We must improve activation in older patients with low-energy trauma and without prehospital care.

Biceps femoris long head morphology in youth competitive alpine skiers is associated with age, biological maturation and traumatic lower extremity injuries.

Lower extremity injuries are common in competitive alpine skiers, and the knee and lower leg are often affected. The hamstring muscles, especially the biceps femoris long head (BFlh), can stabilize the knee and the hip and may counteract various adverse loading patterns during typical mechanisms leading to severe lower extremity injuries. The aim of the present study was to describe BFlh morphology in youth competitive alpine skiers in relation to sex, age and biological maturation and to investigate its association with the occurrence of traumatic lower extremity injuries in the upcoming season. 95 youth skiers underwent anthropometric measurements, maturity offset estimations and ultrasound assessment, followed by 12-months prospective injury surveillance. Unpaired t tests showed that the two sexes did not differ in BFlh morphology, including fascicle length (Lf), pennation angle (PA), muscle thickness (MT) and average anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSAavg). In contrast, U16 skiers had longer fascicles than U15 skiers (9.5 ± 1.3 cm vs 8.9 ± 1.3 cm, p < 0.05). Linear regression analyses revealed that maturity offset was associated with Lf (R 2 = 0.129, p < 0.001), MT (R 2 = 0.244, p < 0.001) and ACSAavg (R 2 = 0.065, p = 0.007). No association was found between maturity offset and PA (p = 0.524). According to a binary logistic regression analysis, ACSAavg was significantly associated with the occurrence of traumatic lower extremity injuries (Chi-square = 4.627, p = 0.031, RNagelkerke 2 = 0.064, Cohen f = 0.07). The present study showed that BFlh morphology is age- and biological maturation-dependent and that BFlh ACSAavg can be considered a relevant modifiable variable associated with lower extremity injuries in youth competitive alpine skiers.

Return to performance following severe ankle, knee, and hip injuries in National Basketball Association players.

The purpose of this study was to compare basketball performance markers 1 y prior to initial severe lower extremity injury, including ankle, knee, and hip injuries, to 1 and 2 y following injury during the regular National Basketball Association (NBA) season. Publicly available data were extracted through a reproducible extraction computed programmed process. Eligible participants were NBA players with at least three seasons played between 2008 and 2019, with a time-loss injury reported during the study period. Basketball performance was evaluated for season minutes, points, and rebounds. Prevalence of return to performance and linear regressions were calculated. A total of 285 athletes sustained a severe lower extremity injury. A total of 196 (69%) played for 1 y and 130 (45%) played for 2 y following the injury. A total of 58 (30%) players participated in a similar number of games and 57 (29%) scored similar points 1 y following injury. A total of 48 (37%) participated in a similar number of games and 55 (42%) scored a similar number of points 2 y following injury. Fewer than half of basketball players who suffered a severe lower extremity injury were participating at the NBA level 2 y following injury, with similar findings for groin/hip/thigh, knee, and ankle injuries. Fewer than half of players were performing at previous preinjury levels 2 y following injury. Suffering a severe lower extremity injury may be a prognostic factor that can assist sports medicine professionals to educate and set performance expectations for NBA players.

Epidemiology of Tibial Fractures in Professional American Football Athletes From 2013 to 2019.

Background:Lower extremity injuries occur with high frequency in National Football League (NFL) athletes and cause high burden to players and teams. Tibial fractures are among the most severe lower extremity injuries sustained in athletes and are associated with prolonged time loss from sport.Purpose:To determine the number of tibial fractures in NFL athletes from the 2013 to 2019 NFL seasons and describe athlete demographics, fracture characteristics, and details of injury onset.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A retrospective review of the NFL injury database was performed to identify all NFL athletes sustaining tibial fractures over the 2013 to 2019 NFL seasons. Athlete characteristics, injury characteristics, days missed, and treatment (operative vs nonoperative) were examined. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means, standard deviations, ranges, and percentages.Results:A total of 64 tibial fractures were identified in 60 athletes, resulting in a median loss of 74 days. Defensive secondary athletes had the highest number of injuries (n = 10; 16%), followed by running backs (n = 9; 14%), while 61% of these injuries occurred during NFL regular-season games, primarily between weeks 13 and 17. The most commonly reported activity during injury was athletes being tackled, with a direct impact to the tibia being the most common mechanism of injury. Lateral tibial plateau fractures were the most frequently reported, while distal tibial fractures resulted in the greatest number of days lost. The median time lost for injuries requiring surgery was 232 days compared with 56 days for injuries treated using conservative management.Conclusion:The highest proportion of tibial fractures were injuries to defensive secondary athletes and athletes being tackled while sustaining a direct impact to the leg, primarily to the lateral tibial plateau. Tibial fracture injuries were commonly sustained during NFL regular-season games, primarily during the final 4 weeks of the NFL regular season. Further investigations examining performance and career longevity in athletes sustaining tibial fractures are warranted to help improve the health and safety of NFL athletes.

Lower Extremity Injury While Undergoing Urology Procedures in the Trendelenburg with Lithotomy Position: Three Case Reports

PurposeTo report and discuss the incidence of severe lower extremity injuries associated with robotic procedures in Trendelenburg with lithotomy position. Design and MethodsA case study method was used to describe three cases of patients who underwent robotically assisted urological procedures in Trendelenburg with lithotomy position and developed serious lower extremities injuries resulting in fasciotomies. Furthermore, a literature review was conducted to evaluate risk factors and possible interventions for the prevention of similar injuries. FindingsCase analysis revealed multifactorial causes, including patient comorbidities, long surgical procedures, and blood pressure decreases below the baseline for more than 30 minutes. The severity of lower extremity injury associated with lithotomy position may be underestimated. The etiology of peripheral nerve injury can be attributed to patient comorbidities, positioning, and surgical conditions. Injury prevention should include careful patient and procedural risk assessment, staff education, and communication strategies. ConclusionsExtreme Trendelenburg with lithotomy position for longer periods can lead to serious lower extremities injuries. Preanesthetic screening and multidisciplinary team discussions for additional precautions for high-risk patients are crucial interventions to decrease incidence and severity of lower extremities injuries.

NPWTi allows safe delayed free flap repair of Gustilo IIIb injuries: A prospective case series.

IntroductionFree flap lower extremity repair is associated with a high complication rate (>31%); higher rates are observed in more severe patients. In cases requiring prior systemic/local stabilization, delayed repair increases complication rate (+10% at 7 days): Negative-pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) decreases complications but only when applied for less than 7 days. Recent limited evidence suggests that augmentation of NPWT with instillation for wound irrigation (NPWTi) might safely extend such window. This study hypothesizes that, through the combined cleansing effect of NPWT and instillation, NPWTi allows safe (low complication rate) delayed free flap repair in severe patients with Gustilo IIIb injuries (GIIIb).MethodsA prospective case series was designed (inclusion criteria: GIIIb requiring microsurgical repair, severe patient/injury condition preventing immediate/early repair; exclusion criteria: allergy to NPWTi dressing). Patients received NPWTi (suction: 125 mmHg continuous; irrigation: NaCl 0.9%) until considered clinically ready for repair. Preoperative/postoperative complications (dehiscence, wound infection, bone non-union, osteomyelitis, flap failure) were monitored with clinical signs, imaging, and serum markers (CRP, WBC).ResultsFour patients (male: N = 4, female N = 1; Age: 59 [44–75] years-old) were treated. NPWTi was applied for 15.2 [9–28] days. No complication (0%) was observed preoperatively or postoperatively. Delayed repair occurred by latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (N = 3), and anterolateral thigh flap (N = 2). All patients walked weight-bearing 12 [6–20] weeks after injury.ConclusionsNPWTi seems to allow safe delayed free flap repair in patients with severe lower extremity injuries unable to undergo immediate/early repair.

A Leg to Stand on: Trauma Center Designation and Association with Rate of Limb Salvage in Patients Suffering Severe Lower Extremity Injury

Mangled extremities are one of the most difficult injuries for trauma surgeons to manage. We compare limb salvage rates for a limb-threatening lower extremity injuries managed at Level I vs Level II trauma centers (TCs). We identified all adult patients with a limb-threatening injury who underwent primary amputation or limb salvage (LS) using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program database at ACS Level I vs II TCs between 2007 and 2017. A limb-threatening injury was defined as an open tibial fracture with concurrent arterial injury (Gustilo type IIIc). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to minimize confounding by indication. There were 712 records for analysis; 391 (54.9%) LS performed and 321 (45.1%) underwent amputation. The rate of LS was statistically higher among patients treated at Level I TCs vs those treated at Level II TCs (47.4% vs 34.8%; p= 0.01). Patients with penetrating injuries (13% vs 9.5%; p= 0.046) and tibial/peroneal artery injury (72.9% vs 50.4%; p < 0.001), as opposed to popliteal artery injury (30.8% vs 58.8%; p < 0.001), were more likely to have LS. The risk-adjusted odds of LS was 3.13 times higher at Level I TCs vs Level II TCs (95% CI, 1.59 to 6.34; p= 0.001). Limb salvage rates were significantly higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs (53.0% vs 34.8%; p= 0.004), even after propensity matching. In patients with a mangled extremity, limb salvage rates are 50% higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs, independent of case mix and injury severity.

552 Limb Salvage: Amputations Prevented with Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane Allografts (dHACM) Used in Combination with Decellularized Human Collagen Matrix (dHCM)

Abstract Introduction Burn and traumatic limb injuries with exposed bone/tendon typically require surgical flaps or amputations for healing. Some burn patients are not candidates for these invasive techniques. Placental amniotic membrane has been used as a wound dressing for more than 100 years and may offer an alternative to flaps and/or amputations. Processed dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM), from human placental tissue, contains type 1 human collagen as well as non-viable cells and 285 identified regulatory proteins including growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, metalloproteinases, and other tissue growth and inflammatory mediators. dHACM has been successfully used as a dressing for wound ulcers, burns, donor sites, &amp; surgical debridement. This study reports the use of dHCAM as a limb salvage tool in four patients with severe injuries. Methods This is a retrospective case series of patients suffering severe lower extremity injury with bone/tendon exposure that had applied dHACM/dHCM over or packed (depending on wound depth), then covered with 3% bismuth tribromophenate petrolatum dressing &amp; glycerol/ hydroxyethylcellulose lubricant. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was initiated; wound re-evaluation occurred in seven days. dHACM/dHCM was reapplied if required (bone still exposed). Results There were 3 males and 1 female with three burns and one NSTI. The mean±sd (median) age was 58±23 (61) years; % total burn surface area 3±3 (2); length of hospital stay 48±30 (40) days; number of tangential excisions &amp; debridements 6.5±1 (6.5); days from admission to product application 49±47 (34) and discharge 24±19 (19) days; negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) 53±6 (56) days. All four patients continued treatment upon discharge with clinic visits and home NPWT. All recovered with good results and no complications. Treatment may be continued with NPWT therapy at home or in a skilled nursing facility. Patients healed after two to three dHACM/dHCM applications and did not require leg or foot amputations. Conclusions In select limb salvage cases, dHACM/HCM may be a promising alternative to extremity amputations, tissue transfer flaps or other techniques for secondary intention healing of wounds with bone/tendon exposure.

Identifying Factors Most Important to Lower Extremity Trauma Patients: Key Concepts from the Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Lower Extremity Trauma, The LIMB-Q.

Severe lower extremity injuries are challenging to treat. The aspects of limb salvage and amputation most important to patients are not well-defined. This study's aim is to develop a conceptual framework for a patient-reported outcome instrument for lower extremity trauma patients, by defining issues and concepts most important to this patient population. This is an interpretative description of transcripts collected from semistructured qualitative interviews at a single institution. High-energy lower extremity trauma patients were recruited by means of purposeful sampling to maximize variability. Thirty-three participant interviews were needed to reach content saturation. These participants were aged 19 to 79 years; 21 were men (63.6 percent); participation was after reconstruction [n= 15 (45.5 percent)], after amputation [n = 11 (33.3 percent)], or after amputation after failed reconstruction [n = 7 (21.2 percent)]. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded line-by-line. Concepts were labeled with major and minor themes and refined through a process of constant comparison. Analysis led to the development of a conceptual framework and item pool to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure. In total, 2430 unique codes were identified and used to generate the conceptual framework covering 10 major themes: appearance, environment, finances, physical, process of care, prosthesis, psychological, sexual, social, and treatment. This study establishes a comprehensive set of concepts, identifying what is most important to severe lower extremity trauma patients. These findings can be used to inform and focus research and clinical care, and provides the framework to develop a lower extremity trauma-specific patient-reported outcome instrument: the LIMB-Q.

Comparing consequences of using two different definitions for body regions for the improvement of personal protective equipment for powered two-wheelers

Objective: Various definitions and uses of the term body region can be found in the literature. A definition of body regions using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) codes not strictly aligned with AIS chapters was developed for use in the European Commission–funded PIONEERS project (Protective Innovations of New Equipment for Enhanced Rider Safety). This work aims to examine the consequences of differently defined body regions on injury priority ranking using the percentage of patients showing at least moderate injury severity (AIS 2+) per regarded body region.Methods: Three different crash investigation data sets of injured riders and/or pillion riders of powered 2-wheelers (PTWs) were used for this analysis. The first contained data for 143 fatalities, the second contained data for 58 severely injured, and the last for contained data for 982 patients from a sample that was close to national representativeness. Frequency of injury was examined using body regions based on the AIS chapters (and first digit of the AIS Unique Identifier) and based on the PIONEERS definition.Results: Though different body region definitions did not result in different top-ranked body regions in terms of injury frequency, different definitions did provide different levels of information that impact priority within AIS chapter-defined regions. For PTW riders, cervical injuries are the highest priority spinal injuries. Thoracic and lumbar spinal injuries seem to occur together with other injuries in the thorax and abdominal region. Severe lower extremity injuries frequently involve the pelvis and the leg.Conclusions: Body regions need to be defined carefully to avoid misinterpretations. Publications that use body regions for their analysis to present injury frequencies should clearly define what they include in each region.

Ankle-foot orthosis alignment affects running mechanics in individuals with lower limb injuries.

Individuals with severe lower extremity injuries often require ankle-foot orthoses to return to normal activities. Ankle-foot orthoses alignment is a key consideration during the clinical fitting process and may be particularly important during dynamic activities such as running. To investigate how 3° changes in sagittal plane ankle-foot orthoses alignment affect running mechanics. Controlled laboratory study. Twelve participants with unilateral lower limb injury ran overground and lower extremity running mechanics were assessed. Participants wore their passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses in three alignments: clinically fit neutral, 3° plantarflexed from clinically fit neutral, and 3° dorsiflexed from clinically fit neutral. The 3° changes in sagittal alignment significantly influenced ankle mechanics during running. The plantarflexed alignment significantly decreased the peak ankle plantarflexor moment, peak knee extensor moment, and peak ankle and knee power absorption and generation compared to more dorsiflexed alignments. Alignment also altered footstrike angle, with dorsiflexed alignments associated with a more dorsiflexed footstrike pattern and plantarflexed alignments toward a more plantarflexed footstrike pattern. However, alignment did not influence loading rate. Small changes in ankle-foot orthoses alignment significantly altered running mechanics, including footstrike angle, and knee extensor moments. Understanding how ankle-foot orthoses design parameters affect running mechanics may aid the development of evidence-based prescription guidelines and improve function for ankle-foot orthoses users who perform high-impact activities. Understanding how ankle-foot orthoses alignment impacts biomechanics should be a consideration when fitting passive-dynamic devices for higher impact activities, such as running. Individual running styles, including footstrike patterns, may be affected by small changes in alignment.

Long-term, patient-centered outcomes of lower-extremity vascular trauma.

To describe the long-term outcomes of military lower-extremity vascular injuries, and the decision making of surgeons treating these injuries. Lower-extremity vascular trauma is an important cause of preventable death and severe disability, and decisions on amputation or limb salvage can be difficult. Additionally, the complexity of the condition is not amenable to controlled study, and there is limited data to guide clinical decision making and establish sensible treatment expectations during rehabilitation. A cohort study of 554 US service members who sustained lower-extremity vascular injury in Iraq or Afghanistan (March 2003 to February 2012) was performed using the military's trauma registry, its electronic health record, patient interviews, and quality-of-life surveys. Long-term surgical and functional outcomes, and the timing and rationale of surgical decisions, were analyzed. Of 579 injured extremities, 49 (8.5%) underwent primary amputation and 530 (91.5%) an initial attempt at salvage. Ninety extremities underwent secondary amputation, occurring in the early (n = 60; <30 days) or late (n = 30; >30 days) phases after injury. For salvage attempts, freedom from amputation 10 years after injury was 82.7% (79.1%-85.7%). Long-term physical and mental health outcomes were similar between service members who underwent reconstruction and those who underwent amputation. This military experience provides data that will inform an array of military and civilian providers who care for patients with severe lower-extremity injury. While the majority salvage attempts endure, success is hindered by ischemia and necrosis during the acute stage and pain, dysfunction and infection in the later phases of recovery. Therapeutic/prognostic, level III.