Severe irAEs Research Articles

Quality of life under treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab in melanoma patients. Real-world data from a prospective observational study at the Skin Cancer Center Kiel

PurposeCombined immunotherapy (ipilimumab + nivolumab) has improved survival in stage IV melanoma patients, making Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL) crucial due to potential immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Previous studies treated HrQoL as secondary/explorative endpoint, and no specific HrQoL questionnaire for melanoma patients on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy exists. This study aimed to gather specific HrQoL data during combined ICI therapy, tracking changes during and after treatment, and examining associations with gender, irAEs, and treatment response.Methods35 melanoma patients (22 males, 13 females) undergoing combined ICI were surveyed using the Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire – Deutsch (IBDQ-D), and the distress thermometer (DT). HrQoL was evaluated during treatment, after six months, and at the onset of autoimmune colitis.ResultsirAEs occurred in 51.4% of patients, with colitis being the most common (26.1%). 45.7% had progressive disease. SF-36 showed stable HrQoL during treatment and follow-up. Women had worse HrQoL on the physical component scale than men (p = 0.019). Patients with progression showed worse HrQoL over time in physical (p = 0.015) and mental health scales (p = 0.04). IBDQ-D showed constant HrQoL throughout treatment and follow-up. Distress on DT remained constant, with women reporting higher levels of distress.ConclusionHrQoL remained stable during and after therapy. Female gender and disease progression negatively impacted HrQoL. The development of irAEs was not associated with HrQoL, though this may not apply to severe irAEs like colitis, which were not assessed.

Immune-related adverse events in a nationwide cohort of real-world melanoma patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD1 – Seasonal variation and association with outcome

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) carry the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), a significant concern as therapy has transitioned to the adjuvant setting. Balancing therapeutic benefits against potential risks is crucial, necessitating real-world data from an unselected patient population in addition to clinical trial data to ensure optimal clinical decision-making. MethodsThis nationwide real-world study assessed irAEs in patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy, primarily nivolumab, for resected stage III-IV melanoma between 2018-2022. Data were retrieved from two national databases: the IMMUNOTOX database and the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED). IrAEs were sub-grouped according to organ systems graded using CTCAE ver. 5.0 ranging from mild toxicities (grade 1-2) to severe (grade 3-4) and fatal (grade 5). ResultsAmong 792 included patients, (55% male, median age 62 years (range 16-88)), 697 patients (88%) experienced an irAE. Severe irAEs occurred in 116 patients (15%) and five (0.6%) died due to toxicity. A landmark analysis showed that patients who experienced at least one irAE before the 1st evaluation at 90 days had an increased progression free survival (PFS) (p=0.032) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.0071). Additionally, a seasonal pattern was noted with higher incidence of irAEs during summer. ConclusionThe prevalence of irAEs in real-world patients is comparable to the observed risk in clinical trials. Patients experiencing irAEs demonstrate a lower risk of melanoma relapse. Further, gender, age and seasonal variation may impact the incidence of irAEs.

Tyrosine Protein Kinase SYK-Related Gene Signature in Baseline Immune Cells Associated with Adjuvant Immunotherapy-Induced Immune-Related Adverse Events in Melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) shows benefits in adjuvant (AT) and neoadjuvant melanoma treatments. However, ICI frequently induces severe immune-related adverse events (irAE). Unlike metastatic disease, in which irAEs are a clinical trade-off for treatment that improves survival, the toxicity burden from ICI in the AT setting is a substantial clinical problem urging for irAE-predictive biomarkers. We assessed postsurgical, pre-ICI treatment peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from clinical trial patients (CheckMate 915) treated with AT nivolumab (n = 130) or ipilimumab/nivolumab (COMBO, n = 82). Performing RNA sequencing differential gene expression analysis, we tested baseline differences associated with severe (grades 3-5) irAEs and constructed an irAE-predictive model using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized logistic regression. The analysis of predicted protein-protein interactions among differentially expressed genes in peripheral CD4+ cells revealed significant enrichment of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathway, associated with severe irAEs in COMBO-treated patients. This gene expression signature predicted severe-irAE COMBO patients (χ2P value = 0.001) with 73% accuracy and was independent of disease recurrence (P = 0.79). The irAE-predictive model incorporating this gene expression signature demonstrated 82% accuracy (χ2P value = 8.91E-06). We identified baseline gene expression differences in key immune pathways of peripheral blood T cells from COMBO-treated patients with grades 3 to 5 irAEs and defined a SYK-related gene signature correctly identifying ∼60% of COMBO-treated patients with grades 3 to 5 irAEs. This finding aligns with our previous work linking anti-CTLA4 irAEs with a germline variant associated with high SYK expression. This gene signature may serve as a baseline biomarker of severe grade 3 to 5 irAE risk, which is especially important in AT treatment.

Nivolumab maintenance improves overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma who experience severe immune-related adverse events on nivolumab plus ipilimumab

BackgroundThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is a highly effective treatment for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common, often necessitating treatment interruption and the use of...

Safety and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in people with HIV infection and cancer: insights from the national prospective real-world OncoVIHAC ANRS CO24 cohort study

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a major advance in cancer management. However, we still lack prospective real-world data regarding their usage in people with HIV infection (PWH).MethodsThe ANRS CO24...

Linoleoyl-lysophosphatidylcholine suppresses immune-related adverse events due to immune checkpoint blockade.

Immune related adverse events (irAEs) after immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy occur in a significant proportion of cancer patients. To date, the circulating mediators of ICB-irAEs remain poorly understood. Using non-targeted mass spectrometry, here we identify the circulating bio-active lipid linoleoyl-lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC 18:2) as a modulator of ICB-irAEs. In three independent human studies of ICB treatment for solid tumor, loss of circulating LPC 18:2 preceded the development of severe irAEs across multiple organ systems. In both healthy humans and severe ICB-irAE patients, low LPC 18:2 was found to correlate with high blood neutrophilia. Reduced LPC 18:2 biosynthesis was confirmed in preclinical ICB-irAE models, and LPC 18:2 supplementation in vivo suppressed neutrophilia and tissue inflammation without impacting ICB anti-tumor response. Results indicate that circulating LPC 18:2 suppresses human ICB-irAEs, and LPC 18:2 supplementation may improve ICB outcomes by preventing severe inflammation while maintaining anti-tumor immunity.

Analysis and evaluation of factors contributing to the occurrence of immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

In recent years, there has been a growing trend in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating a larger patient population. However, it is important to note that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) frequently arise as a result. Therefore, precise patient monitoring becomes essential. We present the findings of a retrospective study conducted at the International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital (referred to as "our hospital") that aimed to identify risk factors linked to the occurrence of irAEs. The study focused on analyzing various factors, including therapeutic and lifestyle backgrounds, as well as laboratory values of patients who received ICI treatment and were subsequently diagnosed with irAE. The study included patients who met the eligibility criteria for ICIs (both single agent and combination therapy) as well as ICI in combination with anticancer drugs. The inclusion period for the study encompassed April 2020 to May 2022 at our hospital. The fifty patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of irAEs: the first group consisted of patients with irAE Grade 2 or lower (referred to as irAE Grade under 2), while the second group included patients with irAE Grade 3 or higher (referred to as irAE Grade over 3). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in age (p=0.027) and CRP (C-reactive protein) levels (p=0.008) among the background factors when comparing the two groups. Additionally, statistically significant differences were observed among different ICI treatment groups in the occurrence of irAEs (p=0.035). however, it was indicated to be a relatively weak correlation. Moving forward, we shifted our focus to examine the frequency of irAEs in relation to exposure. However, we did not observe any significant correlation between exposure and irAE grade. Additionally, even when exposure was doubled through the use of ipilimumab in combination with ICIs (referred to as "Mod exposure"), no correlation was found. Exposure was further categorized into three groups: the PD-1 group, PD-L1 group, and PD-1 + CTLA-4 group. However, no significant correlation was observed between exposure in any of these groups and the grade of irAEs. Similarly, no significant correlation was observed between the dosage of ICI in the fixed-dose group and the weight-based dosage group with exposure and irAE Grade. Based on our study findings, there is a suggestive relationship between age and CRP levels and the occurrence of irAEs of Grade 3 or higher. These factors may play a role in contributing to the development of more severe irAEs.

Prophylactic IL-23 blockade uncouples efficacy and toxicity in dual CTLA-4 and PD-1 immunotherapy

BackgroundImmune-related adverse events (irAEs), characterized by targeted inflammation, occur in up to 60% of patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Evidence proved that the baseline peripheral blood...

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after severe immune-related adverse events: a retrospective analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present clinicians with the challenge of managing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range from mild to severe due to immune system activation 1. While guidelines recommend discontinuing ICIs for grade 3 partial and all grade 4 irAEs, there is growing interest in rechallenging patients based on oncological outcomes, particularly for cardiovascular and neurological irAEs where data remains scarce 1,2. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of ICI rechallenge following grade 3-4 irAEs, specifically focusing on cardiovascular and neurological events, in patients discussed at our multidisciplinary immunotoxicity assessment board between 2019 and 2021. Fifteen patients were included, with a median time to severe irAE onset of 49 days. Among them, five patients experienced neurological adverse events (NAEs): aseptic meningitis (3), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy (1), and ophthalmoplegia (1), while one patient presented with myocarditis. Of the 15 patients retreated with ICIs after initial severe irAEs, 11 (73%) remained free of subsequent irAEs, two (13%) experienced recurrence of the initial irAE, and two (13%) developed new irAEs distinct from the initial event. The median time to event recurrence was 69 days, occurring no earlier than the initial severe irAE. In the subset analysis focusing on severe cardiovascular and neurological irAEs, rechallenge with ICIs was generally well tolerated. However, one patient treated with anti-PD1 experienced a relapse of grade 2 aseptic meningitis. Overall, our findings suggest that rechallenging with ICIs after severe irAEs, including those affecting the cardiovascular and neurological systems, may be safe, particularly after irAE regression and corticosteroid withdrawal.

Toxicity-Induced Discontinuation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: 6-Year Experience from a Specialized Uro-Oncology Center.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have been established as the standard-of-care in various uro-oncological cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequent, but their degree rarely leads to the discontinuation of immunotherapies. Unplanned permanent treatment discontinuation may negatively impact the outcomes of patients, but there are emerging data about a positive correlation between emergence of severe irAEs and therapeutic cancer responses. In this study, a retrospective analysis of patients treated for urothelial carcinoma (UC) with ICI-based immunotherapy was conducted. irAEs were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEs) and radiological responses according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECISTs). Out of 108 patients with metastatic urothelial cancer that underwent immunotherapy, 11 experienced a severe irAE that required permanent discontinuation of ICI therapy. The most frequent irAEs leading to discontinuation were hepatitis (n = 4), pneumonitis (n = 2), and gastritis or colitis (n = 2). Prior to discontinuation (R1), the radiological best response was complete remission (CR) in three patients, partial response (PR) in six, and stable disease (SD) in wo patients. After the discontinuation of ICI therapy (R2), the best responses were CR in six, PR in three, and SD in two patients. Following discontinuation, the majority of these patients showed a sustained treatment response, despite not receiving any cancer-specific treatment. The median time of response after discontinuation of ICI therapy was 26.0 (5.2-55.8) months. We propose accurate counseling and close follow-ups of patients following their discontinuation of ICI therapy due to irAEs, as responses can be durable and deep, and many patients do not require immediate subsequent therapies, even in urothelial cancer. More data are required to find predictors of the length of response to appropriately counsel patients.

Corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants for immune-related adverse events and checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness in melanoma

BackgroundRecent studies indicate an association between immunosuppression for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and impaired survival in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Whether this is related to corticosteroids or second-line immunosuppressants is unknown. In the largest cohort thus far, we assessed the association of immunosuppressant type and dose with survival in melanoma patients with irAEs. MethodsPatients with advanced melanoma who received immunosuppressants for irAEs induced by first-line anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 were included from 18 hospitals worldwide. Associations of cumulative and peak dose corticosteroids and use of second-line immunosuppression with survival from start of immunosuppression were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. ResultsAmong 606 patients, 404 had anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4-related irAEs and 202 had anti-PD-1-related irAEs. 425 patients (70 %) received corticosteroids only; 181 patients (30 %) additionally received second-line immunosuppressants. Median PFS and OS from starting immunosuppression were 4.5 (95 %CI 3.4–8.1) and 31 (95 %CI 15-not reached) months in patients who received second-line immunosuppressants, and 11 (95 %CI 9.4–14) and 55 (95 %CI 41–not reached) months in patients who did not. High corticosteroid peak dose was associated with worse PFS and OS (HRadj 1.14; 95 %CI 1.01–1.29; HRadj 1.29; 95 %CI 1.12–1.49 for 80vs40mg), while cumulative dose was not. Second-line immunosuppression was associated with worse PFS (HRadj 1.32; 95 %CI 1.02–1.72) and OS (HRadj 1.34; 95 %CI 0.99–1.82) compared with corticosteroids alone. ConclusionsHigh corticosteroid peak dose and second-line immunosuppressants to treat irAEs are both associated with impaired survival. While immunosuppression is indispensable for treatment of severe irAEs, clinicians should weigh possible detrimental effects on survival against potential disadvantages of undertreatment.

Neurological Immune-Related Adverse Events Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of various advanced and aggressive types of malignancy has significantly increased both survival and long-term remission rates. ICIs block crucial inhibitory pathways of the immune system, in order to trigger an aggravated immune response against the tumor. However, this enhanced immune activation leads to the development of numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect any system. Although severe neurological irAEs are relatively rare, they carry a high disability burden, and they can be potentially life-threatening. Therefore, clinicians must be alert and act promptly when individuals receiving ICIs present with new-onset neurological symptoms. In this narrative review, we have collected all the currently available data regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of post-ICI neurological irAEs. This review aims to raise physicians' awareness, enrich their knowledge regarding disease pathogenesis, and guide them through the diagnosis and management of post-ICI neurological irAEs.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune-related adverse events in advanced melanoma

The predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in immune-related adverse event (irAE) development remains unknown, although an association between tumor immunogenicity and irAEs has been suggested. We investigated the association between TIL abundance in pretreatment primary and metastasis specimens and the subsequent development of severe irAEs. We retrospectively identified patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who received first-line anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with or without anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) from 10 hospitals in the Netherlands. TILs were scored on representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains of the primary melanoma and pretreatment melanoma metastasis as 'absent', 'nonbrisk', or 'brisk'. A univariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess the association between the TIL scores and the development of severe irAEs. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of severe irAEs. Of the 1346 eligible patients, 536 patients had primary melanoma specimens available, and 613 patients had metastasis specimens available. Severe irAEs occurred in 15% of anti-PD-1-treated patients and 49% of anti-PD-1+ anti-CTLA-4-treated patients. The presence of TILs was not associated with the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs in primary melanoma specimens (P= 0.70) nor pretreatment metastasis specimens (P= 0.91). In the univariable analysis, patients with brisk TILs did not have a higher chance of developing severe irAEs compared with patients with absent TILs, for both primary specimen (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.18) and metastasis specimen (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.59). There was also no significant difference in the lifetime risk or timing of the development of severe irAEs in patients with TILs present compared with patients with TILs absent. There was no association between the TIL scores on H&E-stained slides from the primary melanoma or pretreatment metastasis and the development of grade 3 or higher irAEs. Additionally, no correlation was found between the presence of TILs and the timing of irAEs.

Germline prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation for immune-related adverse events.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can yield remarkable clinical responses in subsets of patients with solid tumors but can also often lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Predictive features of clinically severe irAEs leading to cessation of ICIs have yet to be established. Using data from 1,327 patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs between 2009 and 2022 at four academic medical centers, we evaluated the association of a germline polygenic risk score for autoimmune disease and discontinuation of ICIs due to irAEs. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we assessed the association between a polygenic risk score for autoimmune disease (PRSAD) and cessation of ICI therapy due to irAEs. All models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, lung cancer histology, type of therapy, recruiting center, and the first 5 principal components. To further understand the differential effects of type of therapy and disease stage on the association between PRSAD and cessation of ICI due to irAEs, we conducted stratified logistic regression analysis by type of ICI therapy and disease stage. We found an association between PRSAD and ICI cessation due to irAEs (HR per SD = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.02 - 1.37, P = 0.03). This association was particularly strong in patients who had ICI cessation due to irAEs within three months of therapy initiation (HR per SD = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.08 - 1.78, P = 0.01). Individuals in the top 20th percentile of PRSAD had 7.2% ICI discontinuation for irAEs by three months, compared to 3.9% discontinuation by three months among patients in the bottom 80th percentile (log-rank P = 0.02). In addition, among patients who received combination PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy, PRSAD had an OR per SD of 1.86 (95% CI = 1.08 - 3.51, P = 0.04). We demonstrate an association between a polygenic risk score for autoimmune disease and early ICI discontinuation for irAEs, particularly among patients treated with combination ICI therapy. Our results suggest that germline genetics may be used as an adjunctive tool for risk stratification around ICI clinical decision-making in solid tumor oncology.

Immune-related adverse events and their effects on survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine whether the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following the use of ICIs predicts different clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Relevant studies from the time of database creation to July 20, 2023, were systematically searched to explore the differences in clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC with or without irAEs. The outcome indicators included the occurrence of irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 22 reported the effect on OS, and 19 reported the effect on PFS. The results showed that for patients with NSCLC, the occurrence of irAEs after receiving immunotherapy showed a statistically significant benefit over the absence of irAEs for OS (HR=0.55,95% CI=0.46-0.65) and PFS (HR=0.55 95% CI=0.48-0.64), but severe irAEs (grades 3-5) were associated with worse OS (HR=1.05, 95% CI=0.87-1.27). Compared with gastrointestinal, lung, and hepatitis, irAEs of the skin and endocrine system tend to predict better OS and PFS. The occurrence of irAEs, especially mild and early irAEs, indicates better OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs, irrespective of patient characteristics, type of ICIs, and irAEs. However, Grade 3 or higher toxicities resulted in worse OS. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023409444.

Correlation of patient HLA class I genotypes with severe immune-related adverse events: A retrospective study in Chinese population.

10586 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in multiple tumors. However, about 10% of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are severe and can have serious or even life-threatening consequences for patients. We investigated whether Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes predispose to and thus hold a predictive role of developing of severe irAEs in Chinese population. Methods: In a case/control study, we collected data from patients with metastatic cancer treated with ICIs and developed severe irAEs (Grade ≥3 and required hospitalization). Patients treated with ICIs without any irAEs were used as controls. Data was collected from15th Nov, 2019 until 10th Oct, 2023. HLA typing was performed via next generation sequencing. Results: We enrolled 83 patients with severe irAEs and 286 patients treated with ICIs without any irAEs. We found HLA-B*15:27 (OR=9.1, X21,95 = 7.2, P = 0.008) and HLA-C*04:01 (OR=2.5, X21,95 = 7.0, P =0.008) were significantly associated with severe overall irAEs risk. When assessing irAE individually, a significant association between HLA-B*13:02 and serious myocarditis (OR = 3.4, X21,95 = 6.2, P =0.01) as well as striking enrichment for HLA-A*02:03 haplotypes in severe adrenal insufficiency (OR = 10.0, X21,95 = 19.1, P<0.0001) were observed. Conclusions: Specific HLA alleles were associated with severe irAEs. Consideration of pre-prescription HLA typing and vigilance for serious reactions to ICIs are warranted.

Real-world incidences and risk factors of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rare but fatal, requiring systemic steroid use. Therefore, to examine the outcomes, incidence, timing, and risk factors of ICI-associated steroid-requiring severe irAEs, we conducted a nationwide, retrospective, cohort study utilizing the Korean Health Insurance and Review Assessment database. We identified 357,010 patients with lung cancer, bladder cancer, or skin melanoma, eligible for ICI reimbursement in Korea between January 2012 to June 2020. Steroid-requiring severe irAEs following ICI treatment or treatment-emergent AEs following cytotoxic chemotherapy were defined as moderate- or high-dose steroid administration for over 2 consecutive days, along with corresponding ICD-10 codes indicating affected organ systems. The ICI-exposed group (N = 10,118) was compared to a matched cohort of 55,436 ICI-unexposed patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Incidences of acute severe irAEs requiring moderate- and high-dose steroids were higher in the ICI-exposed group (1.95% and 6.42%, respectively). The ICI-exposed group also had a higher risk of developing delayed severe irAEs requiring moderate- and high-dose steroid use (3.89% and 7.39%). Male sex, high comorbidity index, or previously diagnosed autoimmune diseases were associated with an increased risk of severe irAEs. Notably, 27.4–38.8% of the patients experienced recurrent severe irAEs after re-challenge with ICIs following moderate- or high-dose steroid use, with the severity matching the initial episode. Steroid-requiring severe irAEs were significantly more prevalent among patients exposed to ICIs than among those treated with chemotherapy in acute and delayed periods.

The impact of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on immune-related adverse events in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2648 Background: Cancer patients are a vulnerable population to COVID-19. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have shown to decrease hospitalization and death risk from COVID-19 in cancer patients. Concurrent COVID-19 vaccination and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) use may impact immune-related adverse events (irAEs) synergistically. Limited data exist on how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines affect irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients, especially those with breakthrough infections. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with malignant solid tumors receiving ICIs at a single cancer institute (January 2020 to July 2021). Fully vaccinated status is defined as two consecutive doses of mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273). Patients who were partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated post COVID-19 infection, vaccinated with non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, or last visit within 30 days post vaccination were excluded. All COVID-19 infections were confirmed by PCR. In the vaccinated group, only post-vaccination irAEs were considered as events. Results: 443 patients were included in our study, with 251 (56.7%) vaccinated and 192 (43.3%) unvaccinated. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for age (vaccinated median 68 years, unvaccinated median 62 years, p=0.004). With a median follow-up of 12 months, incidences of all-grade irAEs (19.1% vs. 20.3%, p=0.72) and severe irAEs (5.6% vs. 4.2%, p=0.66) were comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. 34 breakthrough COVID-19 infections occurred. In the vaccinated group, a non-significant trend of higher all-grade irAEs incidence was noted in the COVID-19 infected subgroup compared to uninfected subgroup (29.4% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.11). Univariate analysis linked COVID-19 vaccination (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.35, p=0.04) and ipilimumab + nivolumab use (OR 5.57, 95% CI 1.79-17.35, p=0.003) to a higher risk of all-grade irAEs in the entire cohort. After multivariate adjustment, ipilimumab + nivolumab use remained the only variable associated with all-grade irAEs (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.57-15.64, p=0.006). Conclusions: Our study suggests that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not increase irAE risk in cancer patients on ICIs. Fully vaccinated patients with breakthrough COVID-19 infections may safely continue ICI treatment without an increased irAE risk. [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma: A nationwide real-life study in France (NEOMEL).

9578 Background: Several studies have shown the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment (NT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for resectable stage III/IV melanoma. However, real-life data are lacking. Methods: NEOMEL is a national multicenter retrospective study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of NT with ICI (NT-ICI) for resectable metastatic melanoma in a real-life setting. Data were obtained in patients (pts) with resectable stage III/IV melanoma who initiated NT-ICI (at least one infusion). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) (i.e no residual tumor) rate. Secondary endpoints were pathologic response (pR) according to INMC, radiologic response (RECIST), safety profile (CTCAE) and survival outcomes. Results: A total of 166 pts with resectable stage III/IV melanoma were included. Median age was 67 years (range, 24-96). Most pts had primary cutaneous melanoma (n=157, 89%), stage IIIB-D disease (n=156, 94%); a BRAF V600-mutant melanoma was observed in 47% (n=78); 8% (n=14) pts had received a previous systemic treatment. The median number of infusions of NT-ICI was 3 (range, 1-5). ICI regimens were anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n=122, 73%) or nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) (n=44, 27%). Median follow-up was 6.5 months (range, 1-85). Overall, 143 pts (86%) underwent surgery. A pCR was observed in 44% of pts (n=63/143), including 52% (n=51/99) treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, and 27% (n=12/44) treated with NIVO + IPI. Of note, 78 pts (54%) were treated with 3 infusions of pembrolizumab (PBZ) (according to SWOG 1801 protocol) and had a pCR in 45% (n=35). A pR was assessed according to INMC criteria in 58% of pts (n=83/143): 51% of pCR (n=42), 8% of near-pCR (n=7) corresponding to a major pR of 59% (n=49/83), 16% of pathologic partial response (n=13) and 25% of pathologic non-response (n=21). Twenty-three pts (14%) did not undergo surgery because of progressive disease (n=10), clinical and radiologic responses (8 complete responses, 1 partial response, 1 stable disease), toxicity (n=2) or patient’s choice (n=1). Radiologic overall response rate according to RECIST (data available after NT in 49% of pts) was 54% (n = 44/82). All grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of NT-ICI occurred in 31% (n=51) of pts, including grade 3-4 irAEs in 10% (n=17) and one grade 5 irAE (pneumonitis with PBZ). Severe irAEs (grade 3 or more) were observed in 4% (n=4/99) of pts treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy and 32% (n=14/44) of pts treated with NIVO + IPI. Adjuvant treatment was started for 120 pts (84%). At last follow-up, 26 pts (18%) have had recurrence after surgery, including 3 pts with a pCR and 23 pts with a non-pCR to NT-ICI. Survival data are not yet available. Conclusions: NT-ICI for advanced melanoma demonstrated its efficacy with high rates of pCR in a real-life setting and an acceptable safety profile, particularly NT anti-PD1 monotherapy.

Standard atezolizumab leads to severe overexposure in real-world patients with lung cancer: How far could we go in extending dosing intervals and saving money?

3085 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are given as fixed doses, which may lead to drug exposure exceeding the plasma concentrations required for target engagement. If confirmed, this could pave the way for de-escalating treatments without compromising efficacy while reducing drug-costs. Methods: We monitored plasma concentrations of Atezolizumab in 40 real-world patients. A final set of 33 patients with SCLC or NSCLC were available for full PK/PD analysis. Individual PK parameters were derived using a population pharmacokinetics approach. Individual PK parameters allowed to simulate the full concentration-time profiles and to further simulate for each patient the time to reach the target threshold after the first dose of Atezolizumab. In addition, efficacy (RECIST criteria) and immune-related adverse events, (IRAEs, CTCAE grading) were monitored and statistical analysis was performed to search for possible exposure-response relationships. Results: Overall Response Rate was 55% and no severe IRAEs were observed. All patients had Cmin levels significantly above the target threshold on the first cycle of Atezolizumab. The mean Cmax after the first dose on cycle 1 was 426.1 µg/ml and the mean Cmin was 68.5 µg/ml, i.e. 11-time higher than the target threshold associated with target engagement (i.e., 6 µg/ml). The mean AUC at the first cycle was 4763 µg.d/ml. Exposure metrics and PK parameters at baseline and simulated prior RECIST evaluation were tested together with other covariates (i.e. age, sex, smoking, NLR, number of metastatic sites, line of treatment) as possible predictive markers of response or toxicity. None of the parameters related to Atezolizumab pharmacokinetics or exposure levels were associated with efficacy or toxicity, most likely because all patients had plasma levels well above pharmacologically active concentrations. First-line therapy was associated with better response on univariate analysis, but this effect was lost on multivariate analysis. Further simulations based on time required to fall below the efficacy threshold suggest that dosing intervals could be extended from Q7W to Q19W (mean: Q12W). Considering the annual budget for Atezolizumab at our institution, further simulations showed that the annual drug cost could thus be reduced from 2.5 M€ to 0.6 M€ while ensuring that all patients remain above active concentrations. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates in a real-world setting that standard Atezolizumab given as 1200 mg Q3W infusion leads to severe overexposure of the drug. This strong overexposure was not associated with more severe treatment-related toxicities. Finally, our study suggests that PK-guided dosing with Atezolizumab could help customizing the dosing interval while maintaining efficacious trough levels and that Q12W could be an alternate scheduling leading to significant cut in drug costs.