Severe Hypoglycemic Events Research Articles

Sensor-derived glycaemic metrics in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes randomised to faster acting insulin aspart or insulin aspart-A secondary analysis of the CopenFast trial.

We compared sensor-derived glycaemic metrics in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) randomised to faster acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) or insulin aspart (IAsp). A pre-planned secondary analysis of the CopenFast trial included women with T1D using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) during pregnancy. Glycaemic metrics, including time in range (TIRp, 3.5-7.8 mmol/L) and time below range in pregnancy (TBRp, <3.5 mmol/L), were evaluated in the intervals: from randomisation (median 9.5 weeks, interquartile range 9.0-11.0) to 21 weeks, from 22 to 33 weeks and from 34 to 37 weeks. In total, 113 (91%) of 124 women using isCGM in the original trial were included. At randomisation, glycaemic metrics were comparable in both groups. Women randomised to faster aspart achieved higher TIRp from 22 to 33 weeks (estimated treatment difference 5.1% [95% confidence interval 0.3; 9.7], p = 0.04) and mean TIRp >70% from randomisation to 21 weeks onwards, while this was achieved after 34 weeks in women randomised to IAsp. TBRp remained stable around 4% throughout pregnancy in both groups. One (2%) versus 5 (9%) experienced ≥1 severe hypoglycaemic event (odds ratio 0.93 [-0.2; -0.01], p = 0.04). Infant birthweight standard deviation score was lower in the faster aspart group (estimated treatment difference -0.5 [-0.9; -0.03], p = 0.04); however, this attenuated when adjusting for parity (p = 0.10). Women using faster aspart achieved more TIRp and experienced less severe hypoglycaemia compared to women using IAsp. Infant birthweight was lower and thereby more appropriate in the faster aspart group; however, this attenuated when adjusting for parity.

Eighteen-Month Hybrid Closed-Loop Use in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Arm Multicenter Trial.

We aimed to evaluate the longer-term safety and efficacy of hybrid closed-loop (CL) therapy in very young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Following a 16-week multinational, randomized crossover trial comparing hybrid CL with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in 74 very young children aged 1-7 years with T1D, participants were invited to an extension phase using CL for a further 18 months. Outcomes were compared with the primary-phase SAP period and primary-phase CL period. After the primary study phase, 60 participants were eligible to enroll in the extension. Of these, 49 consented (mean ± SD age 6.6 ± 1.5 years) to continue use of CL for 18 months. Percentage time in range (TIR) 3.9-10.0 mmol/L was 8.4 percentage points (95% CI 6.7 to 10.1; P < 0.001) higher, while HbA1c was 0.4% ([5.0 mmol/mol], 95% CI 0.3 to 0.6 [3.7 to 6.2]; P < 0.001) lower during the CL extension phase compared with primary-phase SAP period. At 18 months, mean HbA1c was 6.7 ± 0.5% and TIR was 70 ± 7%, compared with 6.7 ± 0.5% and 71 ± 6% in the primary-phase CL period. Time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L) was similar between CL extension phase and both primary-phase SAP (P = 0.31) and CL periods (P = 0.70). There were two severe hypoglycemia events and one other serious adverse event during the extension phase. One unexpected serious adverse device effect occurred. Use of the Cambridge hybrid CL system led to sustained improvements in glycemic control lasting more than 18 months in very young children with T1D.

Enhancing severe hypoglycemia prediction in type 2 diabetes mellitus through multi-view co-training machine learning model for imbalanced dataset

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have severe hypoglycemia (SH) poses a considerable risk of long-term death, especially among the elderly, demanding urgent medical attention. Accurate prediction of SH remains challenging due to its multifaced nature, contributed from factors such as medications, lifestyle choices, and metabolic measurements. In this study, we propose a systematic approach to improve the robustness and accuracy of SH predictions using machine learning models, guided by clinical feature selection. Our focus is on developing long-term SH prediction models using both semi-supervised learning and supervised learning algorithms. Using the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes trial, which includes electronic health records for over 10,000 individuals, we focus on studying adults with T2DM. Our results indicate that the application of a multi-view co-training method, incorporating the random forest algorithm, improves the specificity of SH prediction, while the same setup with Naive Bayes replacing random forest demonstrates better sensitivity. Our framework also provides interpretability of machine learning models by identifying key predictors for hypoglycemia, including fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, general diabetes education, and NPH or L insulins. The integration of data routinely available in electronic health records significantly enhances our model’s capability to predict SH events, showcasing its potential to transform clinical practice by facilitating early interventions and optimizing patient management. By enhancing prediction accuracy and identifying crucial predictive features, our study contributes to advancing the understanding and management of hypoglycemia in this population.

Automated Insulin Delivery for Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated A1c

BackgroundAutomated insulin delivery is the treatment of choice in adults with type 1 diabetes. Data are needed on the efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery for children and youth with diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels.MethodsIn this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial, we assigned patients with type 1 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio either to use an automated insulin delivery system (MiniMed 780G) or to receive usual diabetes care of multiple daily injections or non-automated pump therapy (control). The patients were children and youth (defined as 7 to 25 years of age) with elevated glycemia (glycated hemoglobin ≥8.5% with no upper limit). The primary outcome was the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in glycated hemoglobin at 13 weeks.ResultsA total of 80 patients underwent randomization (37 to automated insulin delivery and 43 to control) and all patients completed the trial. At 13 weeks, the mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin decreased from 10.5±1.9% to 8.1±1.8% in the automated insulin delivery group but remained relatively consistent in the control group, changing from 10.4±1.6% to 10.6±1.8% (baseline-adjusted between-group difference, −2.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.1 to −1.8; P<0.001). Patients in the automated insulin delivery group spent on average 8.4 hours more in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dl than those in the control group. One severe hypoglycemia event and two diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred in the control group, with no such events in the automated insulin delivery group.ConclusionsIn this trial of 80 children and youth with elevated glycated hemoglobin, automated insulin delivery significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin compared with usual diabetes care, without resulting in severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis events. (Funded by Lions Clubs New Zealand District 202F and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12622001454763.)

Cardiac autonomic neuropathy modified the association between obesity and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.

Previous studies have shown that increasing body mass index (BMI) was associated with decreased hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes, but it remains uncertain whether this finding could be applied to patients with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN). The study included 7789 participants with type 2 diabetes from action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) trail. CAN was defined as SDNN < 8.2 ms and RMSSD < 8.0 ms. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Outcomes were identified as severe hypoglycemia requiring any assistance (HAA) or requiring medical assistance (HMA). We assessed the association between obesity and severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes with or without CAN using COX regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics. Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, a total of 893 participants developed HAA and 584 participants developed HMA. Compared with non-obesity, obesity was associated with lower risk of severe hypoglycemia (HAA: hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.68, P < 0.001; HMA: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.82, P = 0.002) in CAN present group, but not in CAN absent group (HAA: HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.16, P = 0.830; HMA: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79-1.19, P = 0.754). Similarly, increasing BMI was associated with reduced severe hypoglycemic events in participants with CAN, but not in participants without CAN. CAN modifies the association between obesity and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetic individuals with CAN who are under weight control should pay attention to hypoglycemic events. http://www. gov . Unique identifier: NCT00000620.

Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec in Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials (ONWARDS Clinical Program).

One hundred years have passed since the discovery of insulin, which is one of the most relevant events of the 20th century. This period resulted in extraordinary progress in the development of novel molecules to improve glucose control, simplify the insulin regimen, and ameliorate the quality of life. In late March 2024, the first once-weekly basal analog Icodec was approved for diabetes mellitus, generating high expectations. Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of Icodec compared to once-daily insulin analogs in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Studies were included for the synthesis according to the following prespecified inclusion criteria: uncontrolled T1D or T2D, age ≥ 18 years, insulin Icodec vs. active comparators (Degludec U100, Glargine U100, Glargine U300, and Detemir), phase 3, multicenter, double-blind or open-label RCTs, and a study duration ≥ 24 weeks. The systematic review included 4347 patients with T1D and T2D inadequately controlled (2172 randomized to Icodec vs. 2175 randomized to once-daily basal analogs). Icodec, compared to once-daily basal analogs, slightly reduced the levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of -0.14% [95%CI -0.25; -0.03], p = 0.01, and I2 68%. Patients randomized to Icodec compared to those on once-daily basal analogs had a greater probability to achieve HbA1c < 7% without clinically relevant or severe hypoglycemic events in 12 weeks from randomization with an estimated risk ratio (ERR) of 1.17, [95%CI 1.01, 1.36], p = 0.03, and I2 66%. We did not find a difference in fasting glucose levels, time in range, and time above range between Icodec and comparators. Icodec, compared to once-daily basal analogs, resulted in a slight but statistically significant weight gain of 0.62 kg [95%CI 0.25; 0.99], p = 0.001, and I2 25%. The frequency of hypoglycemic events (ERR 1.16 [95%CI 0.95; 1.41]), adverse events (ERR 1.04 [95%CI 1.00; 1.08]), injection-site reactions (ERR 1.08 [95%CI 0.62; 1.90]), and the discontinuation of treatments were similar between the two groups. Icodec was found to work better when used in a basal-only than basal-bolus regimen with an ETD in HbA1c of -0.22%, a probability of achieving glucose control of +33%, a probability of achieving glucose control without clinically relevant or severe hypoglycemia of +28%, more time spent in target (+4.55%) and less time spent in hyperglycemia (-5.14%). The risk of clinically relevant or severe hypoglycemic events was significantly higher when background glinides and sulfonylureas were added to basal analogs (ERR 1.42 [95%CI 1.05; 1.93]). Insulin Icodec is substantially non-inferior to once-daily insulin analogs in T2D, either insulin-naïve or insulin-treated. However, Icodec works slightly better than competitors when used in a basal-only rather than basal-bolus regimen. Weight gain and hypoglycemic risk are substantially low but not negligible. Patients' education, adequate lifestyle and pharmacological interventions, and appropriate therapy adjustments are essential to minimize risks. This systematic review is registered as PROSPERO CRD42024568680.

Delivery of Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating (DAFNE) in the UK and Ireland 2019-2022

Background To date, evaluations of the structured diabetes education programme, Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE), have focused on improvements in clinical and psychosocial outcomes, however, little is known about implementation and participant attendance across centres. We compared participant profile, course delivery and retention across Irish and UK centres and patterns of course delivery pre and during Covid-19. Methods Data collected annually by DAFNE centres (01.01.2019 to 01.01.2022) were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between demographic (age, gender) and clinical variables (years since diagnosis; DKA requiring admission in past 12 months; severe hypoglycaemic event (hypo) in the last year), course format and country, with non-completion (attended &lt;5 sessions). Results Overall, 6749 people attended DAFNE courses across 91 centres in 3 years. Compared to Ireland, UK-based course attendees were slightly older on average and had diabetes for longer. In 2019 (pre-Covid), 86 centres delivered an average of 10 courses per centre (range: 1 to 30). During Covid (2020) when remote format courses were first offered, 79 centres delivered an average of 5 courses per centre (1 to 15). Overall, 10% of participants did not complete. Younger age, having a severe hypo in the last year, and attending a remote course (vs. standard 5-day face-to-face) were associated with non-completion. Conclusions Course delivery varies widely across centres. This may reflect centre size and resource availability. Although participant non-completion was low, our data do not capture those who withdraw pre-course. Future work should explore barriers and facilitators of course acceptance and retention.

Burden and Coping Strategies of Hypoglycemia in People with Diabetes.

Hypoglycemia is a limiting adverse effect of glucose-lowering medications and particularly insulin replacement therapy. This review provides insights into the burden of hypoglycemia in the management of diabetes and outlines strategies available to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia and improve patients' well-being. People with type 1 diabetes are primarily affected by hypoglycemic episodes which are associated with direct physical harms like injuries and cardiac events as well as indirect psychosocial consequences including constant anxiety, absenteeism, increased healthcare costs and overall poorer quality of life. These complications are more prominent amongst individuals with hypoglycemia unawareness or overnight hypoglycemia and could even extend to caregivers such as parents of children with diabetes. Patients experiencing frequent or severe hypoglycemic events might also develop a pathological fear of hypoglycemia and adopt aberrant behaviors intending to maintain higher blood glucose levels. Modern pharmaceutical options with a safer profile in terms of hypoglycemia are available including novel basal insulins with lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia along with ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs with a shorter duration of action that might avert late post-meal hypoglycemia. Continuous glucose monitoring and sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with low glucose suspend technology can also prevent hypoglycemia, although concerns about cost and patient satisfaction remain. Advancements in insulin therapy and technological modalities should be coupled with ongoing education and support for patients to become co-managers of their disease and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.

Effect of 48 Months of Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery on Residual C-Peptide Secretion and Glycemic Control in Newly Diagnosed Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.

We evaluated the effect of long-term intensive metabolic control with hybrid closed-loop (CL) on residual C-peptide secretion and glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes over 48 months. Following the 24-month primary phase of a multicenter, randomized, parallel trial of 96 newly diagnosed youth aged 10 to 16.9 years, participants were invited to an extension phase using treatment allocated at randomization. They continued with hybrid CL using the Cambridge algorithm or standard insulin therapy (control) until 48 months after diagnosis. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. At 24 months after diagnosis, 81 participants (mean ± SD age 14 ± 2 years) continued in the extension phase (47 CL, 34 control). There was no difference in fasting C-peptide corrected for fasting glucose at 48 months between groups (CL: 5 ± 9 vs. control: 6 ± 14 pmol/L per mmol/L; mean adjusted difference -2 [95% CI -7, 4; P = 0.54]). Central laboratory HbA1c remained lower in the CL group by 0.9% (10 mmol/mol [95% CI 0.2, 1.5; 3, 17 mmol/mol); P = 0.009). Time in target range of 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L was 12 percentage points (95% CI 3, 20; P = 0.008) higher in the CL group compared with control. There were 11 severe hypoglycemic events (6 CL, 5 control) and 7 diabetic ketoacidosis events (3 CL, 4 control) during the extension phase. Improved glycemic control was sustained over 48 months after diagnosis with CL insulin delivery compared with standard therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes. This did not appear to confer a protective effect on residual C-peptide secretion.

Population-Based Study on the Implementation of Flash Glucose Monitoring and Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Objective: We analyzed the effect of implementing a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) technology in a public health care system with universal coverage on the rate of severe hypoglycemia requiring urgent care in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: Using a comprehensive regional dataset, we extracted emergency care codes with hypoglycemia in individuals with T1DM who initiated the use of FGM in Andalucia, Spain, from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Severe hypoglycemia was defined as a confirmed blood glucose <70 mg/dL, which required the urgent dispatch of an emergency medical service (EMS) for onsite management. We compared hypoglycemic events reported in the 12 months before and after the initiation of FGM to determine the population incidence rates. Results: A total of 13,616 participants with a mean age of 43.7 ± 13.5 years were included. The follow-up periods were 23.4 and 24.8 months before and after FGM. There were 969 and 737 cases of hypoglycemia before and after the initiation of FGM. The baseline incidence rate was 358.58 episodes per 10,000 person-years, which decreased to 260.9 at the end of the follow-up (rate-ratio 0.72 [0.66; 0.80]). The reduction in hypoglycemia was significant in individuals aged ≥60 years (rate-ratio 0.40 [0.28; 0.55]) and males (0.64 [0.56; 0.72]). In addition, there was a reduction in the overall median HbA1c of -0.35% (95% CI [-0.38; -0.33], P < 0.001). Conclusion: The implementation of FGM systems in a public health care system as a provision for adults with T1DM was associated with significant reductions in the rate of severe hypoglycemic events that required urgent EMS care.

Association of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor initiation at glycated haemoglobin

Therapeutic inertia, hypoglycaemia and poor treatment persistence can lead to glycaemic fluctuation and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We compared glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) variability, insulin initiation, severe hypoglycaemia and clinical events in patients with T2D initiated dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) at low versus high HbA1c thresholds. Using territory-wide electronic medical records in Hong Kong, we curated a propensity score-matched cohort of patients initiated DPP4i at HbA1c <7.5% versus ≥7.5% in 2007-2019. We expressed the HbA1c variability score (HVS) as a proportion of HbA1c varied by ≥0.5% compared with preceding values. We used the Cox model to compare the risks of insulin initiation and clinical outcomes, adjusted for time-varying variables between the two groups. Mediation analysis estimated the effects of HbA1c variability on outcomes. Among 6874 insulin-naïve patients who initiated DPP4i, 88.7% were treated with metformin and 79.6% with sulphonylureas at baseline (54.9% men; mean age 65.2 ± 11.4 years). After a median follow-up of 4.6 years, compared with the high-threshold plus high-HVS group (≥50%), the low-threshold plus low-HVS (<50%) group had reduced hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of insulin initiation (0.35, 0.31-0.40), severe hypoglycaemia (0.38, 0.34-0.44), major adverse cardiovascular endpoints (0.76, 0.66-0.88), heart failure (0.42, 0.36-0.49), end-stage kidney disease (0.65, 0.36-0.49) and mortality (0.45, 0.35-0.57). Reduced HbA1c variability explained 31.1%-81.2% of the effect size of DPP4i initiation at HbA1c <7.5% versus ≥7.5% on outcomes. In Chinese patients with T2D, avoiding therapeutic inertia with intensified glycaemic control at HbA1c <7.5% using drugs with low risk of hypoglycaemia and good tolerability, such as DPP4i, delayed insulin treatment, reduced HbA1c variability and improved clinical events.

Multicenter Evaluation of Ultra-Rapid Lispro Insulin with Control-IQ Technology in Adults, Adolescents, and Children with Type 1 Diabetes.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and explore the efficacy of use of ultra-rapid lispro (URLi, Lyumjev) insulin in the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ 1.5 technology in children, teenagers, and adults living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: At 14 U.S. diabetes centers, youth and adults with T1D completed a 16-day lead-in period using lispro in a t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ 1.5 technology, followed by a 13-week period in which URLi insulin was used in the pump. Results: The trial included 179 individuals with T1D (age 6-75 years). With URLi, 1.7% (3 participants) had a severe hypoglycemia event over 13 weeks attributed to override boluses or a missed meal. No diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred. Two participants stopped URLi use because of infusion-site discomfort, and one stopped after developing a rash. Mean time 70-180 mg/dL increased from 65% ± 15% with lispro to 67% ± 13% with URLi (P = 0.004). Mean insulin treatment satisfaction questionnaire score improved from 75 ± 13 at screening to 80 ± 11 after 13 weeks of URLi use (mean difference = 6; 95% confidence interval 4-8; P < 0.001), with the greatest improvement reported for confidence avoiding symptoms of high blood sugar. Mean treatment-related impact measure-diabetes score improved from 74 ± 12 to 80 ± 12 (P < 0.001), and mean TRIM-Diabetes Device (score improved from 82 ± 11 to 86 ± 12 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: URLi use in the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ 1.5 technology was safe for adult and pediatric participants with T1D, with quality-of-life benefits of URLi use perceived by the study participants. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT05403502.

Real time continuous glucose monitoring in high-risk people with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial.

To investigate the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) on glycaemia in a predominantly indigenous (Māori) population of adults with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes (T2D) in New Zealand. Twelve-week, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of adults with T2D using ≥0.2 units/kg/day of insulin and elevated glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥64 mmol/mol (8.0%). Following a 2-week blinded CGM run-in phase, participants were randomised to rtCGM or control (self-monitoring blood glucose [SMBG]). The primary outcome was time in the target glucose range (3.9-10 mmol/L; TIR) during weeks 10-12, with data collected by blinded rtCGM in the control group. Sixty-seven participants entered the RCT phase (54% Māori, 57% female), median age 53 (range 16-70 years), HbA1c 85 (IQR 74, 94) mmol/mol (9.9 [IQR 8.9, 10.8]%), body mass index (36.7 ± 7.7 kg/m2). Mean (±SD) TIR increased from 37 (24)% to 53 (24)% [Δ 13%; 95% CI 4.2 to 22; P = 0.007] in the rtCGM group but did not change in the SMBG group [45 (21)% to 45 (25)%, Δ 2.5%, 95% CI -6.1 to 11, P = 0.84]. Baseline-adjusted between-group difference in TIR was 10.4% [95% CI -0.9 to 21.7; P = 0.070]. Mean HbA1c (±SD) decreased in both groups from 85 (18) mmol/mol (10.0 [1.7]%) to 64 (16) mmol/mol (8.0 [1.4]%) in the rtCGM arm and from 81 (12) mmol/mol (9.6 [1.1]%) to 65 (13) mmol/mol (8.1 [1.2]%) in the SMBG arm (P < 0.001 for both). There were no severe hypoglycaemic or ketoacidosis events in either group. Real-time CGM use in a supportive treat-to-target model of care likely improves glycaemia in a population with insulin-treated T2D and elevated HbA1c.

ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH GLP1–RECEPTOR AGONISTS TREATMENT IN DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK: A META–ANALYSIS

Abstract Background GLP1–receptor agonists (GLP1–RA) have been associated with a reduction of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk. However, these drugs have some adverse effects. The aim of this study was to assess the relative risk (RR) of adverse effects in patients with a high risk of developing CV disease treated with GLP1–agonists. Methods we considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the cardiovascular effects of GLP1–RA in diabetic patients with high CV risk. The following outcomes were explored: pancreatitis, severe hypoglycemia, renal and urinary serious adverse events (SAE), gastrointestinal SAE and AE, pancreatic cancer, and neoplasms. Results 8 RCTs, enrolling 60008 patients, were included in the analysis. There was no difference between GLP1–RA and placebo in the risk of pancreatitis (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.73–1.35; p=0.972), severe hypoglycemia (0.93; 95% CI 0.76–1.15; p=0.501), renal and urinary SAE (0.94; 95% CI 0.82–1.07; p=0.339), pancreatic cancer (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.56–1.70; p=0.936) and neoplasms (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.95–1.09; p=0.547) (Fig 1 A e B). Conversely, GLP1–agonist treatment was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal AE (RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.23–3.06; p=0.004) (Fig 2). However, when gastrointestinal SAE were considered, GLP1–agonists demonstrated similar risk compared to placebo (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92–1.28; p= 0.318) (Fig 2). Conclusion in diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk, the treatment with GLP1–RA has been associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal AE. No difference in severe gastrointestinal AE has been associated with GLP1–RA.

IGlarLixi for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of iGlarLixi-a novel, fixed-ratio, soluble combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide-for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to November 15, 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing iGlarLixi with a placebo or any other antidiabetic agent in adults with T2D. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the outcomes. A total of 10 trials enrolling 6071 T2D patients were included. Compared with placebos or other antidiabetic agents, iGlarLixi exerted beneficial effects on changes in HbA1c, the percentage of patients who achieved an HbA1c < 7%, the percentage of patients who achieved an HbA1c < 6.5%, the percentage of patients who achieved an HbA1c < 7.0% without weight gain and/or without severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemic episodes, changes in fasting plasma glucose, and changes in self-measured plasma glucose. Regarding safety, iGlarLixi did not increase the incidence of severe hypoglycemia or serious adverse events but did increase the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, symptomatic hypoglycemia, and adverse events (e.g., nausea, vomiting, diarrhea). iGlarLixi showed improved efficacy and safety in patients with T2D. Additional large, multicenter RCTs are warranted to obtain deeper insights into the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, thereby providing guidance for clinical treatment decisions.

Impacts of medication adherence and home healthcare on the associations between polypharmacy and the risk of severe hypoglycemia among elderly diabetic patients in Taiwan from 2002 to 2012: A nationwide case-crossover study

AimTo assess how medication adherence and home healthcare support influence the role of polypharmacy in induced hypoglycemia events among elderly diabetic patients. MethodsThis case-crossover study retrieved records on diabetic patients >=65 years with severe hypoglycemia from 2002 to 2012 in Taiwan. Case period defined as 1–3 days before severe hypoglycemia was compared with a preceding control period of the same length, with an all-washout period of 30 days. Moreover, the modifiable effects of medication adherence and home healthcare service use were evaluated by stratified analysis. ResultsTotally 2,237 patients were identified. Polypharmacy use was associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia. Patients receiving polypharmacy without home healthcare services (aOR: 1.34; 95 % CI: 1.16–1.54) and those with poor adherence to anti-diabetic medications (aOR: 1.48; 95 % CI: 1.24–1.77) were significantly associated with an elevated risk of severe hypoglycemia. In patients with good adherence, non-home healthcare users being prescribed with polypharmacy had a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the group that received home healthcare services, patients with poor adherence using polypharmacy had a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia. ConclusionsGood adherence and receiving home healthcare services were associated with a decreased odds of severe hypoglycemic events in elderly diabetic patients, regardless of the fact whether they were prescribed with polypharmacy.

SPIRIT: Assessing Clinical Parameters Associated with Using IDegLira in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting in Colombia.

Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) is a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec (a basal insulin) and liraglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist [GLP-1RA]). This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after initiating IDegLira treatment in a real-world setting in Colombia. SPIRIT is a non-interventional, single-arm, retrospective chart review study to assess clinical outcomes in people with T2DM. Participating patients were switched from a treatment regimen of basal insulin (with or without oral antidiabetics [OADs]) and started on treatment with IDegLira a minimum of 26 ± 6weeks before the data collection start date. Data were collected from the medical records of 175 patients in ten clinical centers across Colombia. Compared with baseline, there was a significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (1.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.6 to -1.0; p < 0.0001) after 26 ± 6weeks of follow-up. The mean HbA1c at baseline and at the end of the study was 9.1% and 7.8%, respectively. In addition, IDegLira significantly reduced absolute body weight by 1kg (95% CI -1.5 to -0.5; p < 0.0001), from a mean of 76.1kg at baseline to 75.1kg after follow-up. The mean IDegLira dose at the end of the study was 21.3 U, and no severe hypoglycemic events were observed during the follow-up period. In real-world practice, initiating IDegLira in patients with T2DM previously treated with basal insulin (± OAD) was associated with improved glycemic control, reduced body weight and reduced risk of hypoglycemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05324462.

Switching to Tirzepatide 5 mg From Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: Clinical Expectations in the First 12 Weeks of Treatment

ObjectiveThis prospective study aimed to describe the clinical course in terms of glycemic outcomes, body weight, and adverse events during the first 12 weeks following a switch from glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) directly to tirzepatide 5 mg. MethodsParticipants were ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5% to ≤9.0%, body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and were on a stable treatment dose of GLP-1 RAs (liraglutide every day [1.2, 1.8 mg], semaglutide once-weekly [0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg], or dulaglutide once-weekly [0.75, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg]) for ≥3 months at baseline. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline at week 12. Secondary end points included change from baseline in fasting serum glucose, body weight, and glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. Safety was also assessed. ResultsParticipants were 58.3 years on average, with baseline HbA1c 7.39%, body mass index 35.18 kg/m2, T2D duration around 12.4 years, and included 55% females. Semaglutide (55%) and dulaglutide (42%) were the most commonly used GLP-1 RAs at baseline with semaglutide 1.0 mg and dulaglutide 1.5 mg being the most common treatment doses. At week 12, mean HbA1c changed from baseline by −0.43%, fasting serum glucose by −7.83 mg/dL, and body weight by −2.15 kg (all P < .01). Glycemic outcomes and body weight improved in participants in all baseline GLP-1 RA subgroups. Twenty participants (13.2%) developed gastrointestinal events. Three (2%) participants discontinued tirzepatide due to adverse events. There were no severe hypoglycemic events or deaths. ConclusionIn this prospective study, when people with T2D on stable GLP-1 RA treatment were switched directly to tirzepatide 5 mg, they experienced improved glycemic outcomes and additional weight reduction with an acceptable risk of adverse gastrointestinal events over 12 weeks.

The effect of closed-loop glucose control on C-peptide secretion in youth with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: the CLOuD RCT

Background We assessed whether a sustained period of intensive glucose control with hybrid closed-loop for 12 months following diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents can preserve C-peptide secretion compared to standard insulin therapy. Methods In an open-label, multicentre, randomised, parallel trial, youth aged 10–16.9 years were randomised within 21 days of type 1 diabetes diagnosis to hybrid closed-loop or standard insulin therapy (control). Primary end point was the difference in mixed-meal C-peptide area under the curve 12 months post diagnosis. Key secondary end points included time spent in target glucose range, glycated haemoglobin and time spent below target glucose range at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. The Closed Loop from Onset in Type 1 Diabetes consortium secured external funding for participants to continue on beyond 12 months, but the funding by National Institute for Health and Care Research and the results reported here refer only to the 12 months follow-up. Results We randomised 97 participants (mean ± standard deviation age 12 ± 2 years), 51 to closed-loop and 46 to control therapy. There was no difference in C-peptide area under the curve at 12 months between groups [geometric mean (interquartile range) closed-loop (n = 46): 0.35 pmol/ml (0.16, 0.49) vs. control (n = 37): 0.46 pmol/ml (0.22, 0.69); mean adjusted difference –0.06 (95% confidence interval –0.14 to 0.03); p = 0.19]. The proportion of time in target range 3.9–10.0 mmol/l based on 14-day masked LibrePro (Abbott Diabetes Care, Maidenhead, UK) sensor glucose data at 12 months was 10 percentage points (95% confidence interval 2 to 17) higher in the closed-loop group (64 ± 14%) compared to control group (54 ± 23%). Arithmetic mean glycated haemoglobin A1c was lower in the closed-loop group by 4 mmol/mol (0.4%) [95% confidence interval 0 to 8 mmol/mol (0.0% to 0.7%)] at 12 months. The mean difference in time spent &lt; 3.9 mmol/l between groups was 0.9 percentage points (95% confidence interval –1.0 to 2.8). Three severe hypoglycaemic events occurred in the closed-loop group (two participants), and one in the control group; one diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in the closed-loop group. Conclusions A sustained period of hybrid closed-loop glucose control following diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents does not slow down the decline in residual C-peptide secretion compared with standard insulin therapy. Despite the lack of effect on C-peptide, glycaemic control was sustained in the closed-loop group, whereas glycaemic control deteriorated in the control group 6 to 9 months after diagnosis and closed-loop safely accommodated the variability in exogenous insulin requirements which occur with beta-cell recovery post diagnosis. Limitations of the study included no central measurement of auto-antibodies at diagnosis. There was imbalance in the rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis which is associated with a more rapid decline in C-peptide secretion, but this was adjusted for in the analyses. This highlights the need for improved therapies to allow youth to achieve recommended glycaemic targets from onset of type 1 diabetes irrespective of the lack of effect on residual C-peptide secretion. Future work includes ongoing follow-up of the study population for up to 4 years after diagnosis to observe how any differences in glycaemic control between treatment groups develop over time. Trial registration This trial is registered as Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02871089. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme (NIHR award ref: 14/23/09), the Helmsley Trust (2016PG-T1D045 and 2016PG-T1D046), and JDRF (22-2013-266 and 2-RSC-2019-828-M-N), and is published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 11, No. 8. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Additional support for the artificial pancreas work was from the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Abbott Diabetes Care supplied free glucose monitoring devices, and Dexcom supplied discounted continuous glucose monitoring devices. Medtronic supplied discounted insulin pumps, phone enclosures, continuous glucose monitoring devices, and pump consumables.

Adaptive Biobehavioral Control: A Pilot Analysis of Human-Machine Coadaptation in Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: While it is well recognized that an automated insulin delivery (AID) algorithm should adapt to changes in physiology, it is less understood that the individual would also have to adapt to the AID system. The adaptive biobehavioral control (ABC) method presented here attempts to compensate for this deficiency by including AID into an information cloud-based ecosystem. Methods: The Web Information Tool (WIT) implements the ABC concept via the following: (1) a Physiological Adaptation Module (PAM) that tracks metabolic changes and adapts AID parameters accordingly and (2) a Behavioral Adaptation Module (BAM) that provides information feedback. The safety of WIT (primary outcome) was assessed in an 8-week randomized, two-arm parallel pilot study. All participants used the Control-IQ® AID system enhanced with PAM, but only those in the Experimental group had access to BAM. Secondary glycemic outcomes were computed using the 2-week baseline period and the last 2 weeks of treatment. Results: Thirty participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) completed all study procedures (17 female/13 male; age: 40 ± 14 years; HbA1c: 6.6% ± 0.5%). No severe hypoglycemia, DKA, or other serious adverse events were reported. Comparing the Experimental and Control groups, no significant difference was observed in time in range (70-180 mg/dL): 74.6% vs 73.8%, adjusted mean difference: 2.65%, 95% CI (-1.12%,6.41%), P = 0.161. Time in 70-140 mg/dL was significantly higher in the Experimental group: 50.7% vs 49.2%, 5.71% (0.44%,10.97%), P = 0.035, without increased time below range: 0.54% (-0.09%,1.17%), P = 0.089. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that it is safe to integrate an AID system into the WIT ecosystem. Validation in a full-scale study is ongoing.