Severe Hemolytic Disease Of The Fetus And Newborn Research Articles

Design of a Phase 3, Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Nipocalimab in Pregnancies at Risk for Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.

Nipocalimab is a neonatal fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptor (FcRn)-blocking monoclonal antibody that inhibits placental immunoglobulin G (IgG) transfer and lowers circulating maternal IgG levels. In an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, nipocalimab demonstrated evidence of safety and efficacy that support further investigation in a pivotal phase 3 trial of recurrent hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The phase 3 AZALEA study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in a larger population at risk for severe HDFN, defined as HDFN associated with poor fetal outcomes or neonatal death. AZALEA is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study enrolling alloimmunized pregnant individuals (N ≈ 120) at risk for severe HDFN based on obstetric history. Participants are randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous 45 mg/kg nipocalimab or placebo weekly from 13-16 to 35 weeks gestational age (GA). During the double-blind treatment period, participants receive standard-of-care weekly monitoring for fetal anemia until planned delivery at 37 to 38 weeks of GA. Postnatal follow-up periods are 24 weeks for maternal participants and 104 weeks for neonates/infants. The primary endpoint is the proportion of pregnancies that do not result in intrauterine transfusion (IUT), hydrops fetalis, or fetal loss/neonatal death from all causes. Key secondary endpoints include the severity of HDFN as measured by a composite HDFN severity index, the earliest time to occurrence of IUT or hydrops fetalis, the modified neonatal mortality and morbidity index in liveborn neonates, and the number of IUTs received. Other endpoints are safety, patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (e.g., IgG, FcRn receptor occupancy), and immunogenicity of nipocalimab. AZALEA, the first placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, prospective trial in severe HDFN, is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nipocalimab, a potential preventive and noninvasive intervention, in at-risk HDFN pregnancies. · Severe HDFN leads to poor fetal/neonatal outcomes.. · IUTs are associated with complications and fetal loss.. · Nipocalimab blocks IgG recycling and placental transfer.. · Nipocalimab reduces fetal anemia and IUTs in early-onset severe HDFN.. · The phase 3 AZALEA study evaluates nipocalimab in severe HDFN..

Nipocalimab in Early-Onset Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

BackgroundIn early-onset severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), transplacental transfer of maternal antierythrocyte IgG alloantibodies causes fetal anemia that leads to the use of high-risk intrauterine transfusions in order to avoid fetal hydrops and fetal death. Nipocalimab, an anti–neonatal Fc receptor blocker, inhibits transplacental IgG transfer and lowers maternal IgG levels.MethodsIn an international, open-label, single-group, phase 2 study, we assessed treatment with intravenous nipocalimab (30 or 45 mg per kilogram of body weight per week) administered from 14 to 35 weeks’ gestation in participants with pregnancies at high risk for recurrent early-onset severe HDFN. The primary end point was live birth at 32 weeks’ gestation or later without intrauterine transfusions as assessed against a historical benchmark (0%; clinically meaningful difference, 10%).ResultsLive birth at 32 weeks’ gestation or later without intrauterine transfusions occurred in 7 of 13 pregnancies (54%; 95% confidence interval, 25 to 81) in the study. No cases of fetal hydrops occurred, and 6 participants (46%) did not receive any antenatal or neonatal transfusions. Six fetuses received an intrauterine transfusion: five fetuses at 24 weeks’ gestation or later and one fetus before fetal loss at 22 weeks and 5 days’ gestation. Live birth occurred in 12 pregnancies. The median gestational age at delivery was 36 weeks and 4 days. Of the 12 live-born infants, 1 received one exchange transfusion and one simple transfusion and 5 received only simple transfusions. Treatment-related decreases in the alloantibody titer and IgG level were observed in maternal samples and cord blood. No unusual maternal or pediatric infections were observed. Serious adverse events were consistent with HDFN, pregnancy, or prematurity.ConclusionsNipocalimab treatment delayed or prevented fetal anemia or intrauterine transfusions, as compared with the historical benchmark, in pregnancies at high risk for early-onset severe HDFN. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; UNITY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03842189.)

Neonatal and Obstetrical Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated by Alloimmunization.

Despite advances in the prevention of rhesus (Rh)(D) alloimmunization, alloantibodies to Rh(D) and non-Rh(D) red blood cell antigens continue to be detected in ∼4% of US pregnancies and can result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Recent reports on HDFN lack granularity and are unable to provide antibody-specific outcomes. The objective of this study was to calculate the frequency of alloimmunization in our large hospital system and summarize the outcomes based on antibody specificity, titer, and other clinical factors. We identified all births in a 6-year period after a positive red blood cell antibody screen result during pregnancy and summarized their characteristics and outcomes. A total of 707 neonates were born after a positive maternal antibody screen result (3.0/1000 live births). In 31 (4%), the positive screen result was due to rhesus immune globulin alone. Of the 676 neonates exposed to alloantibodies, the direct antibody test (DAT) result was positive, showing antigen-positivity and evidence of HDFN in 37% of those tested. Neonatal disease was most severe with DAT-positive anti-Rh antibodies (c, C, D, e, E). All neonatal red blood cell transfusions (15) and exchange transfusions (6) were due to anti-Rh alloimmunization. No neonates born to mothers with anti-M, anti-S, anti-Duffy, anti-Kidd A, or anti-Lewis required NICU admission for hyperbilirubinemia or transfusion. Alloimmunization to Rh-group antibodies continues to cause a majority of the severe HDFN cases in our hospital system. In neonates born to alloimmunized mothers, a positive DAT result revealing antigen-positivity is the best predictor of anemia and hyperbilirubinemia.

Receipt of RhD-positive whole blood for life-threatening bleeding in female children: A survey in alloimmunized mothers regarding minimum acceptable survival benefit relative to risk of maternal alloimmunization to anti-D.

Low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for treatment of hemorrhagic shock sometimes necessitates transfusion of RhD-positive units due to short supply of RhD-negative LTOWB. Practitioners must choose between using RhD-positive LTOWB when RhD-negative is unavailable against the risk to a female of childbearing potential of becoming RhD-alloimmunized, risking hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in future children, or using component therapy with RhD-negative red cells. This survey asked females with a history of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization about their risk tolerance of RhD alloimmunization compared to the potential for improved survival following transfusion of RhD-positive blood for an injured RhD negative female child. A survey was administered to RBC alloimmunized mothers. Respondents were eligible if they were living in the United States with at least one red cell antibody known to cause HDFN and if they had at least one RBC alloimmunized pregnancy. Responses from 107 RBC alloimmmunized females were analyzed. There were 32/107 (30%) with a history of severe HDFN; 12/107 (11%) had a history of fetal or neonatal loss due to HDFN. The median (interquartile range) absolute improvement in survival at which the respondents would accept RhD-positive transfusions for a female child was 4% (1%-14%). This was not different between females with and without a history of severe or fatal HDFN (p = .08 and 0.38, respectively). Alloimmunized mothers would accept the risk of D-alloimmunization in a RhD-negative female child for improved survival in cases of life-threatening bleeding.

Maternal and child life years gained by transfusing low titer group O whole blood in trauma: A computer simulation.

Using low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) is increasingly popular for resuscitating trauma patients. LTOWB is often RhD-positive, which might cause D-alloimmunization and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) if transfused to RhD-negative females of childbearing potential (FCP). This simulation determined the number of life years gained by the FCP and her future children if she was resuscitated with LTOWB compared with conventional component therapy (CCT). The model simulated 500,000 injured FCPs of each age between 0 and 49 years with LTOWB mortality relative reductions (MRRs) compared with components between 0.1% and 25%. For each surviving FCP, number of life years gained was calculated using her age at injury and average life expectancy for American women. The number of expected future pregnancies for FCPs that did not survive was also based on her age at injury; each future child was assigned the maximum lifespan unless they suffered perinatal mortality or serious neurological events from HDFN. The LTOWB group with an MRR 25% compared with CCT had the largest total life years gained. The point of equivalence for RhD-positive LTOWB compared to CCT, where life years lost due to severe HDFN was equivalent to life years gained due to FCP survival/future childbearing, occurred at an MRR of approximately 0.1%. In this model, RhD-positive LTOWB resulted in substantial gains in maternal and child life years compared with CCT. A >0.1% relative mortality reduction from LTOWB offset the life years lost to HDFN mortality and severe neurological events.

Low titer group O whole blood and risk of RhD alloimmunization: Rationale for use in Finland.

Prehospital low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) used for patients with life-threatening hemorrhage is often RhD positive. The most important complication following RhD alloimmunization is hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Preceding clinical use of RhD positive LTOWB, we estimated the risk of HDFN due to LTOWB prehospital transfusion in the Finnish population. We collected data on prehospital transfusions in Tampere and Helsinki University Hospital areas. Using the mean of reported alloimmunization rates in trauma studies (24%) and a higher reported rate representing trauma patients of 13-50 years old (42.7%), we estimated the risk of HDFN and extrapolated it to the whole of Finland. We estimated that in Finland, with the current prehospital transfusion rate we would see 1-3 cases of severe HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusions every 10 years, and fetal death due to HDFN caused by LTOWB transfusion less than once in 100 years. The estimated risk of serious HDFN due to prehospital LTOWB transfusion in the Finnish population is similar to previous estimates. As Finland routinely screens expectant mothers for red blood cell antibodies and as the contemporary treatment of HDFN is very effective, we support the prehospital use of RhD positive LTOWB in all patient groups.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Immunoglobulin G1 and Immunoglobulin G3 Subclasses of Anti-D Antibody in Rh D Alloimmunized Antenatal Women

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) occurs as a result of maternal sensitization to paternal antigens. Studies have shown that the immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass in maternal serum – particularly the presence of IgG1 and IgG3 either singly or in combination, has an impact on the presence and severity of HDFN. The column agglutination technology is used for the identification of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses. Therefore, the prevalence of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses in a cohort of alloimmunized Rh (D) antenatal women at our center was studied and was correlated with severity of HDFN. The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to find out the prevalence of IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses among Rh (D) alloimmunized women and (2) to assess the clinical outcome of newborns born to mothers with respect to IgG subclass. Methodology: This was a descriptive study done on 75 antenatal Rh (D) alloimmunized women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Blood samples from study participants were subjected to IgG subtyping using the “DAT IgG1/IgG3 ID card” (Bio-Rad, Switzerland), and the outcome of pregnancy was assessed by categorizing the newborns into mild, moderate, and severe HDFN. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Prevalence was calculated and severity of HDFN was correlated with subclass. Results: Among the study population, 23% of mothers had IgG1 alone. Majority (72%) had both IgG1 + IgG3 subclasses and a few (5%) had IgG2 + IgG4. When the mother had both IgG1 + IgG3 subclasses in their body most newborns had only mild HDFN. Few cases of moderate-to-severe cases of HDFN were seen. Most newborns had only mild HDFN even though there were few moderate-to-severe cases of HDFN. No significant association could be demonstrated between severity of HDFN and type of IgG subclasses. Conclusion: Majority of maternal IgG found in HDFN was a combination of IgG1+IgG3.Such cases exhibited stronger grades of reaction in Indirect Coombs Test. A significant association could not be demonstrated between severity of HDFN and type of IgG subclasses.

Clinical significances and distribution of unexpected antibodies found in infants

IntroductionThe unexpected antibody test is an essential for ensuring the safety of blood transfusions. In infants, different pre-transfusion tests and transfusion strategies are needed due to their immature antigen/antibody system. This study aims to analyze the pattern of unexpected antibodies and their clinical significance in infants. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the results of unexpected antibody identification tests performed on infants under one year of age at Asan Medical Center from 1999 to 2022. Patients’ unexpected antibody identification test results and clinical information were investigated. The results of unexpected antibody identification and phenotype of each patient’s mother were collected. Results45 cases of antibody results were studied. 25 cases were found in infants under 4 months of age, and 18 cases (76%) were associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The most common unexpected antibody in infants was anti-M (17 cases). There was one case of severe HDFN caused by anti-M. In 10 cases, anti-E and anti-c were found together, and 9 of these cases were associated with HDFN. There were four cases with a history of previous transfusion. ConclusionsNon-ABO antibodies found in infants showed a different pattern compared to adults. Interpreting unexpected antibody tests in infants, it is important to consider the clinical status of the infant and the test results of the mother, due to possibility of HDFN. To our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal the distribution and clinical significances of unexpected antibodies found in infants in Korea.

Hemolytic Disease of Newborn Following Anti-C and Anti-S Alloimmunization

Background: Non-Rhesus D antigen non-ABO, minor blood group alloimmunization in pregnant women is being increasingly recognized as a significant contributor to the development of the hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). We report severe HDFN in a neonate born to an Rh-positive mother with sickle cell disease, following anti-C and anti-S alloimmunization. Clinical Description: A male baby born to a repeatedly transfused mother with sickle cell disease developed severe jaundice at 22 h of life. The baby was found to have severe anemia and indirect hyperbilirubinemia, but no encephalopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, or features of sepsis. Management and Outcome: His blood group was O positive and the direct Coombs test was 4+. Minor blood group typing showed the presence of anti-C and anti-S antibodies. The baby improved after receiving a double-volume exchange transfusion with matched blood and phototherapy. Conclusion: Severe hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) may be caused by minor blood group alloimmunization, especially seen in mothers with a history of multiple transfusions. Antenatal screening for alloimmunization in high-risk mothers can ensure timely diagnosis and treatment of HDN and prevent the harmful effects of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Live birth prevalence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in the United States from 1996 to 2010

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) is mediated by maternal alloantibodies, a consequence of immune sensitization during pregnancy with maternal-fetal incompatibility with ABO, Rhesus factor (Rh), and/or other red blood cell antigens. RhD, Kell, and other non-ABO alloantibodies are the primary cause of moderate to severe HDFN, whereas ABO HDFN is typically mild. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to Rh alloimmunization among newborns in the United States was last estimated to be 106 per 100,000 births in 1986. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to all alloantibodies was estimated to be 817 to 840 per 100,000 in Europe. There is a need for updated prevalence estimates in the United States and a better understanding of disease demographics, severity, and treatments. This study aimed to estimate the live birth prevalence of HDFN and the proportion of severe cases of HDFN in the United States, to describe the associated risk factors, and to compare the clinical outcomes and treatments among healthy newborns, newborns with HDFN, and newborns who are sick without HDFN using a nationally representative hospital discharge database. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we used data from the 1996 to 2010 National Hospital Discharge Survey to identify live births, defined by inpatient visits with the newborn flag, with and without a diagnosis of HDFN across 200 to 500 sampled hospitals (≥6 beds) per year. Patient and hospital characteristics, alloimmunization status, disease severity, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Frequencies and weighted percentages were calculated for all variables. Logistic regression was used to compare the characteristics between newborns with HDFN and other newborns using odds ratios. Of 480,245 live births identified, 9810 HDFN cases were recorded. When weighted to the United States population, this corresponded to a live birth prevalence of 1695 per 100,000 live births. Compared with other newborns, newborns with HDFN were more likely to be female, Black, living in the South (vs the Midwest or West), and treated at larger (>100 beds) and government-owned hospitals. ABO and Rh alloimmunization accounted for 78.1% and 4.3% of newborns with HDFN, respectively, whereas HDFN caused by other antigens, such as Kell and Duffy, accounted for 17.6% of the cases. Among newborns with HDFN, 22% received phototherapy, 1% received simple transfusions, and 0.5% received exchange transfusions or intravenous immunoglobulin. Newborns affected by HDFN caused by Rh alloimmunization were more likely to require medical interventions, including simple or exchange transfusions, and more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery. Overall, HDFN was associated with a longer hospital length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit when compared with healthy and other sick newborns, a higher rate of cesarean delivery, and a higher rate of nonroutine discharge than healthy newborns. Overall, the live birth prevalence of HDFN was higher than those previously reported, whereas Rh-induced HDFN live birth prevalence was similar to those previously reported. HDFN live birth prevalence owing to Rh alloimmunization decreased over time, likely because of continued Rh immune globulin prophylaxis. Treatment patterns for newborns with HDFN and the comparative clinical outcomes when compared with healthy newborns confirm the continued clinical needs of this population.

Serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity in antenatal testing and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: The BEST collaborative study.

The clinical significance of serologic reactivity of unidentified specificity (SRUS) in pregnancy is not clear based on available literature. The aim of this study is to determine if SRUS is associated with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Retrospective data were collected from eight institutions over an 11-year study period (2010-2020), when available (5/8 sites). The outcome of the pregnancies with SRUS-no, mild, moderate, or severe HDFN-was determined. SRUS was demonstrated in 589 pregnancies. After excluding those with incomplete data, a total of 284 pregnancies were included in the primary HDFN outcome analysis. SRUS was detected in 124 (44%) pregnancies in isolation, and none were affected by HDFN. Of 41 pregnancies with SRUS and ABO incompatibility, 37 (90%) were unaffected, and 4 (10%) were associated with mild HDFN. Of 98 pregnancies with SRUS and concurrent identifiable antibodyreactivity(s), 80 (81%) were unaffected, and 19 (19%) were associated with mild to severe HDFN. There was 1 case of mild HDFN and 1 case of severe HDFN in the 21 pregnancies with SRUS, ABO incompatibility, and concurrent identifiable antibodyreactivity(s), and 19 (90%) were unaffected by HDFN. Among all patients with repeat testing, newly identified alloantibodies or other antibodies were identified in 63 of 212 (30%) patients. Although most were not clinically significant, on occasion SRUS preceded clinically significant antibody(s) associated with HDFN (3%, 5/188). The antenatal serologic finding of SRUS in isolation is not associated with HDFN but may precede clinically significant antibodies.

Severe hemolytic disease of a newborn due to anti-E combined with anti-Mia, anti-Mur and anti-Hil

Background: Common alloantibodies leading to severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) could vary among different ethnic groups. The MNS blood group hybrid glycophorin GP.Mur distributes with a high frequency in the regions of Southeast Asia. Alloantibodies against GP.Mur (anti-‘Mia’) often present as mixture of antibodies against several low frequency antigens. In this study, we first described a case of severe HDFN in Guangzhou, China, which was caused by alloantibodies of anti-E in combination with specificities to the GP.Mur including Mia, Mur and Hil.

Population-based incidence and risk factors for cholestasis in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

ObjectiveTo estimate the incidence of cholestasis in neonates with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and investigate risk factors and long-term liver disease.Study designA population-based cohort study of all infants born with HDFN within the Stockholm region between 2006 and 2015. The study period was the first 90 days of life, and presence of any chronic liver disease was evaluated at two years of age.ResultsCholestasis occurred in 7% (11/149). Median age at detection was 1.1 days. Intrauterine blood transfusions and maternal alloimmunization with multiple red blood cell antibodies including D-, c- or K-antibodies were independent risk factors for cholestasis. No infant had chronic liver disease at two years of age.ConclusionsInfants with severe HDFN have increased risk for cholestasis, particularly those requiring multiple intrauterine transfusions. Early and repeated screening for conjugated hyperbilirubinemia in the first week of life is needed to ensure adequate management.

The combined effect of anti-D and non-D Rh antibodies in maternal alloimmunization

Objective:This study aims to investigate the distribution of antibodies that cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) and compare the clinical outcomes of pregnancies affected by anti-D and anti-D combined with non-D Rh alloimmunization.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively searched and obtained the perinatal and neonatal data of patients with anti-D antibodies and anti-D combined with non-D Rh antibodies (anti-c, -C, -e, -E, and -Kell) from October 2015 to December 2018 at the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses and adjusted odds ratios with their confidence intervals were used to define independent risk factors for non-D antibody positive.Results:The severe fetal hydrops rate was significantly higher in the anti-D combined non-D group (3/25, 12%) than in the anti-D group (1/128, 0.08%, p<0.001). The intrauterine transfusion (IUT) requirement in the anti-D combined non-D group (16/25, 64%) tended to be significantly higher than that in the anti-D group (5/128, 7.46%, p<0.001). The incidence of neonatal exchange transfusion, top-up transfusion, and postnatal phototherapy frequency in the anti-D combined non-D group was significantly higher than in the anti-D group.Conclusion:Anti-D combined with another non-D Rh alloantibody resulted in significantly higher HDFN rates than the anti-D alloimmunized pregnancies. Also, anti-D in association with non-D Rh antibodies resulted in more severe HDFN requiring more invasive treatment procedures, including IUT, neonatal exchange transfusion, or top-up transfusion.

Management and clinical consequences of red blood cell antibodies in pregnancy: A population-based cohort study.

Anti-D alloimmunization is the most common cause of severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The management of pregnancies affected by less frequent red blood cell (RBC) antibodies poses a challenge to clinicians, and perinatal outcomes are less well described. This study aimed to describe the frequency of clinically significant RBC antibodies in our pregnant population and analyze the risk of prenatal and postnatal treatment for HDFN in relation to our national risk classification system and management guidelines. A retrospective cohort study in the population of all alloimmunized singleton pregnancies in the Stockholm region 1990-2016. Descriptive summaries of different RBC antibodies and pregnancy outcomes were presented, the risks of intrauterine blood transfusion (IUT) and neonatal treatment for HDFN were estimated by type of antibodies. Of the 1724 alloimmunized pregnancies, 1079 (63%) were at risk of HDFN and constituted our study cohort. Anti-D was detected in 492 (46%) pregnancies, followed by anti-E in 161 (15%), and anti-c in 128 (12%). Eighty-seven (8%) pregnancies had IUT, with the highest risk in pregnancies affected by anti-D combined with other antibodies. The maximum titer recorded before IUT was 64 or above, except for two pregnancies affected by anti-c, for which the maximum titers were 8 and 16. For the 942 (95%) live-born neonates from 992 alloimmunized pregnancies without IUT, the median gestational age at birth was 38+5 weeks compared with 35+5 weeks for those who had IUT. Neonatal treatment was most common in the anti-D alone and anti-D combined groups, with 136 (57%) and 21 (44%), respectively, treated with phototherapy and 35 (15%) and 9 (20%) receiving exchange transfusions, respectively. For pregnancies complicated by moderate- and low-risk antibodies, phototherapy was less frequent (32 [36%] and 21 [19%]) and exchange transfusion was rare (5 [6%] and 3 [3%]). Anti-D, especially in combination with other antibodies, presents the highest risk of severe HDFN. The classification of less frequent and less well-known RBC antibodies into risk groups can help clinicians in assessing the risk of HDFN and counseling alloimmunized pregnant women regarding the risk of prenatal and postnatal treatments.

Low prevalence red blood cell antigens: transfusions, babies, and changing demographics

See article on page 870–874, in this issue

Diagnostic value of laboratory monitoring to predict severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in non-D and non-K-alloimmunized pregnancies.

Pregnant women are routinely screened for red blood cell (RBC) antibodies early in pregnancy. If RBC-alloantibodies are detected, repeated laboratory testing is advised to timely identify pregnancies at high risk for severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). We assessed for RBC alloantibodies, other than anti-D or anti-K, cut-offs for the titer and the antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) test to select high-risk cases. To advise on test repeat intervals, and to avoid unnecessary testing, we evaluated the chance for exceeding the cut-offs for Rh antibodies other than anti-D, Jk, Fy, and S/s antibodies. Diagnostic value of antibody titer and ADCC test was determined with data from a prospective index-cohort study, conducted in 2002-2004. Laboratory test outcomes were from a recent observational cohort (2015-2016). A titer cut-off of ≥16 showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI:73-100%) and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 17% (95% CI:14%-20%). The percentage of pregnancies reaching a titer above the cut-off of ≥16 varied from 0% for anti-Jka /Jkb (n = 38) to 36% for anti-c (n = 97). The ADCC test showed no cut-off with a 100% sensitivity. However, in cases with a titer ≥16 and an ADCC test ≥30% a PPV of 38% was obtained to detect severe HDFN. A titer cut-off of ≥16 is adequate to detect all cases at risk for severe HDFN; the ADCC test may add a more accurate risk estimation. Repeated testing is recommended in pregnancies with anti-c. In pregnancies with other Rh antibodies a repeated test in the third trimester is recommended.

Anti-Ula as the Cause of Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: A Case Report

Background: Ula, part of the Kell blood group system, is a low-frequency antigen found predominantly in the Finnish population. Anti-Ula is a rare antibody to cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Methods and Findings: We report one woman with two pregnancies in which anti-Ula caused severe HDFN requiring intrauterine (IU) transfusions. In the first affected pregnancy, two IU transfusions were performed, but the cause of fetal anemia was unknown at the time and an immune-based mechanism was not suspected. In the following pregnancy, anti-Ula with a titer of 1-2 was identified, and as the fetus was anemic, six IU transfusions were performed. The detection of anti-Ula is difficult, because it is not usually included in the antibody screening cells. Conclusions: The possibility of a rare antibody as the cause of severe HDFN should be kept in mind in cases in which the antibody screening has been negative, and further antibody detection studies should be performed as part of fetal anemia investigations. If anti-Ula is identified in a pregnant woman, close ultrasound monitoring of the fetus is important because HDFN may develop even when the antibody titers are low.

Anti-D Antibodies in Pregnant D Variant Antigen Carriers Initially Typed as RhD+

Background: To evaluate the incidence, the consequences, and the prevention strategy of anti-D alloimmunizations of D variant carriers in the obstetric population of Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia. Methods: RhD immunization events were evaluated retrospectively for the period between 1993 and 2012. Women were tested for RhD antigen and irregular antibodies. Those with anti-D antibody who were not serologically D- were genotyped for RHD. They were evaluated for their obstetric and transfusion history and their titer of anti-D. The neonates were evaluated for RhD status, direct antiglobulin test (DAT), hemoglobin and bilirubin levels, transfusion therapy as well as phototherapy and outcome. Results: Out of 104,884 live births 102,982 women were tested for RhD antigen. Anti-D immunization occurred in 184 women which accounts for 0.9% of individuals at risk of anti-D formation. 181 cases occurred in women serologically typed as D-. Three women were partial D carriers (DVa n = 2, DNB n = 1), initially typed RhD+, and recognized as D variant carriers after the immunization occurred. Anti-D titer varied from 1:1 to 1:16. Six children were RhD+, four had positive DAT, and two underwent phototherapy. Conclusion: Anti-D immunization occurred in pregnant partial D carriers (DVa, DNB). RhD+ children had serologic markers of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), with no cases of severe HDFN.

Severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to anti-C+G

Abstract Anti-G is commonly present with anti-D and/or anti-C and can confuse serological investigations. In general, anti-G is not considered a likely cause of severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), but it is important to differentiate it from anti-D in women who should be administered anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis. We report one woman with three pregnancies severely affected by anti-C+G requiring intrauterine treatment and a review of the literature. In our case, the identification of the correct antibody was delayed because the differentiation of anti-C+G and anti-D+C was not considered important during pregnancy since the father was D–. In addition, anti-C+G and anti-G titer levels were not found to be as reliable as is generally considered in Rh immunization. Severe HDFN occurred at a maternal anti-C+G antibody titer of 8 and anti-G titer of 1 in comparison with the critical titer level of 16 or more in our laboratory. Close collaboration between the immunohematology laboratory and the obstetric unit is essential. In previously affected families, early assessment for fetal anemia is required even when titers are low. Immunohematology 2015;31:123–127.