Setting Of Metastatic Disease Research Articles

Biological sample collection to advance research and treatment: a Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research (FOSTER) and Euro Ewing Consortium (EEC) statement.

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are bone tumours mostly diagnosed in children, adolescents and young adults. Despite multi-modal therapy, morbidity is high and survival rates remain low, especially in the metastatic disease setting. Trials investigating targeted therapies and immunotherapies have not been ground-breaking. Better understanding of biological subgroups, the role of the tumour immune microenvironment, factors that promote metastasis and clinical biomarkers of prognosis and drug response are required to make progress. A prerequisite to achieve desired success is a thorough, systematic and clinically linked biological analysis of patient samples but disease rarity and tissue processing challenges such as logistics and infrastructure have contributed to a lack of relevant samples for clinical care and research. There is a need for a Europe-wide framework to be implemented for the adequate and minimal sampling, processing, storage and analysis of patient samples. Two international panels of scientists, clinicians and patient and parent advocates have formed the Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research (FOSTER) consortium and the Euro Ewing Consortium (EEC). The consortia shared their expertise and institutional practices to formulate new guidelines. We report new reference standards for adequate and minimally required sampling (time points, diagnostic samples, liquid biopsy tubes), handling and biobanking to enable advanced biological studies in bone sarcoma. We describe standards for analysis and annotation to drive collaboration and data harmonisation with practical, legal and ethical considerations. This position paper provides comprehensive guidelines that should become the new standards of care that will accelerate scientific progress, promote collaboration and improve outcomes.

Impact of primary tumor resection in the management of metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the small bowel and pancreas.

Patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) often present with advanced disease. Primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is controversial. Most studies evaluating the impact of PTR on overall survival (OS) have been performed using large population-based databases, with limited treatment related data. This study aims to determine whether PTR improves OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET. This is a retrospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET between 1978 and 2021. The primary outcome was OS. The secondary outcome was PFS. Chi-squared tests and Cox regression were used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA). OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Between 1978 and 2021, 505 patients presented with metastatic NET, 151 of whom had well-differentiated GEP-NET. PTR was performed in 31 PNET and 77 SBNET patients. PTR was associated with improved median OS for PNET (136 vs. 61 months, p = .003) and SBNET (not reached vs. 79 months, p<.001). On MVA, only higher grade (HR 3.70, 95%CI 1.49-9.17) and PTR (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.53) influenced OS. PTR resulted in longer median PFS for patients with SBNET (46 vs. 28 months, p = .03) and a trend toward longer median PFS for patients with PNET (20 vs. 13 months, p = .07). In patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET, PTR is associated with improved OS and may be associated with improved PFS and should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Abstract PO1-27-07: Is HER2-low a biologically distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype? Prognosis and pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early breast cancer (BC) HER2 negative

Abstract Background: Overexpression of HER2 is a significant prognostic and predictive factor in early breast cancer. HER2 positive tumors are those scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or 2+ with amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). These tumors may benefit from HER2-targeted treatment and additionally, in early HER2-positive BC, achieving a complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment improves patient survival. In recent years, new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates have proven effective for HER2 low BC (defined as IHC score 1+ or 2+ not amplified) in the metastatic disease setting; however, in HER2-low early BC, studies testing novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are ongoing. Currently, we don´t know exactly whether HER2 expression can influence the pathological response rate after NAT or disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients compared to HER2-zero (IHC 0). The aim of our study is to determine the impact on response rate to NAT and survival outcomes in early HER2-negative BC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in two hospitals in Andalucia, Spain. Patients with early HER2 negative BC treated with NAT from January 2015 to June 2022 were included. Patients were divided into HER2 low patients (IHC 1+ or 2+ not amplified) and HER2 0 (IHC 0). We collected clinical and pathological characteristics, pathological response rate using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) system where a complete pathological response (pCR) was defined as ypT0/ypTis and ypN0, and survival outcomes. The primary objective of the study was to analyze the pCR rate after NAT according to HER2 score, and secondary objectives were to assess disease-free survival and overall survival (DFS and OS rates). Results: 574 patients were included (100% women). 397 patients had hormone receptors (luminal BC) on these tumors, and 177 did not have them, i.e., triple-negative BC (TNBC). 225 patients were HER2-zero, and 312 patients were HER2-low (253/312 patients had luminal BC and 59/312 patients were TNBC). The pCR in HER2-low patients was 17.3% and 23.1% in HER2-zero patients (p=0.047). For luminal BC patients, the pCR was 16.7% in HER2-low tumors and 13.7% in HER2-zero tumors (p=0.29). Similarly, there was no difference in pCR rates in TNBC patients (45.8% in HER2-low and 53.8% in HER2-zero tumors, respectively, (p=0.958). The overall survival (OS) at 96 months was 88.7% (95% CI 85.6%-92%). Regarding survival outcomes, neither HER2 expression level was associated with higher 8-year DFS: 81.1% in HER2-low patients (95% CI 75.7%-86.8%) and 74.9% in HER2-zero patients (95% CI 62.3%-90.1%) p=0.64. There was no difference between histological subtypes at 8-years regarding DFS rate: 80.5% (95% CI 74.3%-87.2%) in luminal HER2-low patients and 76.3% (95% CI 60.8%-95.7%) in luminal HER2-zero patients, p=0.22; 83.8% in TNBC HER2-low (95% CI 74.5%-94.2%) and 77.5% in TNBC HER2-zero patients (95% CI 69.4%-86.6%) p=0.26. We also didn´t find significant differences in terms of OS. For HER2-low patients, the 8-year OS was 90.9% (95% CI 87%-94.9%) and for HER2-zero patients, it was 86.4% (95% CI 80.8%- 92.5%) p=0.46. There were also no differences in OS for different histological subgroups with an 8-year OS in luminal HER2-low breast cancer patients of 92.5% (95% CI 88%-96.7%) and 87% in HER2-zero (95% CI 78.9%-96.1%) p=0.91. In patients with triple-negative breast cancer phenotype, the OS was 84.2% for HER2-low (95% CI 74.5%-95.2%) and 85.3% for HER2-zero (95% CI 77.9%-93.4%) p=1. Conclusions: We found no difference in survival outcomes and response rate to conventional NAT between HER2-low and HER2-zero expression levels. Therefore, our data do not support the hypothesis of HER2-low as a biologically specific breast cancer subtype. Further research on this approach with HER2 antibody-drug conjugate schemes as an alternative to traditional NAT schemes is warranted. Citation Format: Ana Gil-Torralvo, Yeray Rodriguez, Alejandro Falcon, David Morales, Mónica Cejuela, Isabel Miras, Marta Amérigo, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Juan Bayo, Francisco Javier Salvador Bofill. Is HER2-low a biologically distinct breast cancer (BC) subtype? Prognosis and pathological complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in early breast cancer (BC) HER2 negative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-07.

Abstract LB113: Immunogenicity of Atezolizumab plus personalized neoantigen vaccination (PGV-001) in patients with urothelial cancer in adjuvant vs metastatic setting

Abstract Background: Urothelial cancer (UC) of the genitourinary tract, most commonly arising from the bladder, has historically been a challenging area for the development of new therapeutics. Immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors (CBIs) induce durable responses only in a subset of patients with UC, potentially due to lack of neoantigen primed T cells. To build on this hypothesis, we designed a study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a combination treatment with atezolizumab and PGV-001, a personalized genomic neoantigen vaccine. Having previously reported clinical outcomes, here we describe analysis of immunogenicity induced by the treatment. Methods: In this phase I trial (NCT03359239) UC patients were enrolled to receive PGV-001 with atezolizumab in the adjuvant (undergone radical cystectomy or nephroureterectomy with a high risk of recurrence) or metastatic setting. Each PGV001 vaccine included up to 10 neoantigen (predicted using OpenVax pipeline) synthetic long peptides (SLPs). Each subject received 10 PGV-001 vaccines and 1200 mg i.v. atezolizumab every 3 weeks for up to 12 months (adjuvant) or 24 months (metastatic). To investigate T cell immunity, ex vivo IFNγ ELISPOT and T cell expansion assays were performed using 15mer overlapping peptide (OLP) pools corresponding to each neoantigen SLP. Results: Samples from 9 subjects (3 adjuvant and 6 metastatic) were evaluable for ex vivo ELISPOT analysis. In 100% of the subjects, at least 1 neoantigen was found to elicit an immune response. Overall, out of 87 evaluated neoantigens, 47% were immunogenic, with the immunogenic peptides inducing an average of 16.7 fold increase in ex vivo ELISPOT response over baseline. While 39% (11/28) of the peptides in adjuvant cohort were immunogenic vs 51% (39/50) in metastatic cohort, it is not possible to determine statistically significant difference in response between metastatic and adjuvant cohort. The T cell expansion assay was performed for 6 subjects, 3 each from the adjuvant and metastatic cohorts. Among 57 evaluated neoantigens, 46% and 54% of the peptides elicited a CD8+ and CD4+ T cell targeted immune response, respectively. A greater proportion of neoantigens induced both CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses in subjects treated in the metastatic setting vs adjuvant setting. Upon epitope mapping, for 5 evaluable subjects, 141 OLPs were analyzed and a similar number of OLPs were found to be immunogenic for CD8+ (31.2%, 44/141) and CD4+ response (30%, 43/141). Conclusions: These data indicate that vaccination with personalized neoantigens in combination with systemic anti-PD-L1 can induce neoantigen-focused T cell responses in both adjuvant and metastatic disease settings. However, the single arm nature of the trial, and sample size, preclude definitive assessment of the contribution of the components of the combination therapy. Future studies will investigate the efficacy of this approach on a larger scale with pre- and on-treatment analyses of treatment-driven immunomodulation. Citation Format: Mansi Saxena, Jonathan Anker, Julia Kodysh, Timothy O'Donnell, Marcia Meseck, Olivia Hapanowicz, Scot Niglio, Hardik Shah, Yayoi Kinoshita, Rachel Brody, Alex Rubinsteyn, Robert Sebra, Nina Bhardwaj, Mathew Galsky. Immunogenicity of Atezolizumab plus personalized neoantigen vaccination (PGV-001) in patients with urothelial cancer in adjuvant vs metastatic setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB113.

Update on the Sentinel Node Procedure in Vulvar Cancer.

Early-stage vulvar cancer is managed by a local excision of the primary tumor and, if indicated, a sentinel node (SN) biopsy to assess the need for further groin treatment. With the SN procedure, many patients can be treated less radically and will experience less complications and morbidity compared with an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL). Still, the SN procedure can be further optimized. Different tracers for detecting the SN are being investigated, aiming to optimize detection rates and decrease the burden of the procedure and short-term complications. Until now, no standardized protocols exist for the pathologic workup of the SN, possibly leading to discrepancies in detection of metastases between institutes using different methods. New techniques, such as one-step nucleic amplification, seem to have potential in accurately detecting metastases in other cancers, but have not yet been investigated in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Furthermore, several studies have investigated the possibility to broaden the indications for the SN procedure, such as its use in recurrent disease, larger tumors, or multifocal tumors. Although these studies show encouraging results, cohorts are small and further studies are needed. Prospective studies are currently investigating these subgroups. Lastly, several studies investigated optimization of groin treatment of patients with a metastatic SN. Inguinofemoral radiotherapy is a good alternative to IFL in patients with micrometastases in the SN, with comparable efficacy and less treatment-related morbidity. Reduction of the radicality of groin treatment is also possible in other ways, such as omitting contralateral IFL in patients with lateralized tumors and a unilateral metastatic SN. In conclusion, the SN procedure is an established procedure in early-stage VSCC, although optimization of the technique, pathologic workup, indications, and treatment in the setting of metastatic disease are the subject of ongoing research.

Rapidly Evolving Pre- and Post-surgical Systemic Treatment of Melanoma.

With the development of effective BRAF-targeted and immune-checkpoint immunotherapies for metastatic melanoma, clinical trials are moving these treatments into earlier adjuvant and perioperative settings. BRAF-targeted therapy is a standard of care in resected stage III-IV melanoma, while anti-programmed death-1 (PD1) immunotherapy is now a standard of care option in resected stage IIB through IV disease. With both modalities, recurrence-free survival and distant-metastasis-free survival are improved by a relative 35-50%, yet no improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated. Neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy improves event-free survival by approximately an absolute 23%, although improvements in overall survival have yet to be demonstrated. Understanding which patients are most likely to recur and which are most likely to benefit from treatment is now the highest priority question in the field. Biomarker analyses, such as gene expression profiling of the primary lesion and circulating DNA, are preliminarily exciting as potential biomarkers, though each has drawbacks. As in the setting of metastatic disease, markers that inform positive outcomes include interferon-γ gene expression, PD-L1, and high tumor mutational burden, while negative predictors of outcome include circulating factors such as lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-8, and C-reactive protein. Integrating and validating these markers into clinically relevant models is thus a high priority. Melanoma therapeutics continues to advance with combination adjuvant approaches now investigating anti-PD1 with lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), T-cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), and individualized neoantigen therapies. How this progress will be integrated into the management of a unique patient to reduce recurrence, limit toxicity, and avoid over-treatment will dominate clinical research and patient care over the next decade.

Surgery for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES).

This European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) guideline provides evidence-based recommendations based on the surgical management for locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, indications for neoadjuvant therapy, primary tumor resections in the setting of metastatic disease and surgical indications for Grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Genetically engineered mouse model of pleomorphic liposarcoma: Immunophenotyping and histologic characterization

IntroductionPleomorphic liposarcoma is a rare and aggressive subset of soft-tissue sarcomas with a high mortality burden. Local treatment largely consists of radiation therapy and wide surgical resection, but options for systemic therapy in the setting of metastatic disease are limited and largely ineffective, prompting exploration of novel therapeutic strategies and experimental models. As with other cancers, sarcoma cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models have been developed and used to characterize these tumors and identify therapeutic targets, but these models have inherent limitations. The establishment of genetically engineered mouse models represents a more realistic framework for reproducing clinically relevant conditions for studying pleomorphic liposarcoma. MethodsTrp53fl/fl/Rb1fl/fl/Ptenfl/fl (RPP) mice were used to reliably generate an immunocompetent model of mouse pleomorphic liposarcoma through Cre-mediated conditional silencing of the Trp53, Rb1, and Pten tumor suppressor genes. Evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was assessed with immunostaining for CD4, CD8, and PD-L1, and flow cytometry with analysis of CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, F4/80, CD11b, and NKp46 sub-populations. ResultsMice reliably produced noticeable soft-tissue tumors in approximately 6 weeks with rapid tumor growth between 100 and 150 days of life, after which mice reached euthanasia criteria. Histologic features were consistent with pleomorphic liposarcoma, including widespread pleomorphic lipoblasts. Immunoprofiling and assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was consistent with other soft-tissue sarcomas. ConclusionGenetically engineered RPP mice reliably produced soft-tissue tumors consistent with pleomorphic liposarcoma, which immunological findings similar to other soft-tissue sarcomas. This model may demonstrate utility in testing treatments for this rare disease, including immunomodulatory therapies.

An Unusual Presentation: High-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Fallopian Tube Manifesting With Altered Mental Status Secondary to a Single Brain Metastasis—A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Epithelial ovarian and fallopian cancers are aggressive lesions that rarely metastasize to the central nervous system. Brain metastases usually occur in the setting of known primary disease or widespread metastatic disease. However, in extremely rare cases, an isolated intracranial neoplasm may be the first presentation of fallopian cancer. To the best of our knowledge, only one such case has been reported previously. We present an illustrative case with multimodality imaging and histopathologic correlation of a fallopian tube carcinoma first presenting with altered mental status secondary to an isolated brain metastasis. A 64-year-old female with no pertinent medical history presented with altered mentation. Initial workup identified a 1.6 cm avidly enhancing, solitary brain lesion at the gray-white junction with associated vasogenic edema concerning for either central nervous system lymphoma or metastatic disease. Additional imaging identified a 7.5×3 cm left adnexal lesion, initially thought to be a hydrosalpinx with hemorrhage, but magnetic resonance imaging suggested gynecologic malignancy. No lesions elsewhere in the body were identified. Given the lack of locoregional or systemic disease, the intracranial and pelvic lesions were assumed to represent synchronous but distinct processes. The intracranial lesion was biopsied. Preliminary results were suggestive of lymphoma, but further analysis was consistent with high-grade serous carcinoma of müllerian origin. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed to evaluate for other neoplastic lesions, only highlighting the intracranial and pelvic lesions. At this point, a diagnosis of metastatic fallopian cancer was made. The patient was taken for robot-assisted laparoscopy with surgical debulking of the pelvic neoplasm, pathology demonstrating high-grade serous carcinoma of the fallopian tube, matching that of the intracranial lesion. Even though rare, metastatic fallopian cancer should be considered in patients with isolated brain lesions and adnexal lesions, even in the absence of locoregional or systemic disease.

Role of Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancers-Advances, Challenges and Future Strategies.

Gastroesophageal cancers (GECs) carry considerable morbidity and mortality, and demonstrate geographical histological variances in addition to molecular heterogeneity. Consequently, the immunogenicity of the different subtypes, which can predict the likelihood of immunotherapy response, can vary. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has transformed the treatment of many cancer types over the past decade but has been slower to gain a foothold in the treatment paradigm of GECs. This article reviews the existing evidence and use approvals for immunotherapies and immune-based treatments in GECs, in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic disease settings. The challenges of and limitations to ICI application in current clinical practice are examined. Ongoing clinical trials and future directions of research are also considered. ICI therapy has become an established treatment option within GECs, both perioperatively and in advanced disease. However, nuances in terms of its use are not yet fully understood. Ongoing research proposes to broaden the application of immunotherapies in GECs with the potential to continue to improve outcomes.

The impact of histologic subtype on primary site surgery in the management of metastatic lobular versus ductal breast cancer: a population based study from the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

PurposePrimary site surgery for metastatic breast cancer improves local control but does not impact overall survival. Whether histologic subtype influences patient selection for surgery is unknown. Given differences in surgical management between early-stage lobular versus ductal disease, we evaluated the impact of histology on primary site surgery in patients with metastatic breast cancer.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2010–2016) was queried for patients with stage IV HR-positive, HER2-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We compared clinicopathologic features, primary site surgery rates, and outcomes by histologic subtype. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with and without propensity score matching were used for overall survival (OS) analyses.ResultsIn 25,294 patients, primary site surgery was slightly but significantly less common in the 6,123 patients with ILC compared to the 19,171 patients with IDC (26.9% versus 28.8%, p = 0.004). Those with ILC were less likely to receive chemotherapy (41.3% versus 47.4%, p < 0.0001) or radiotherapy (29.1% versus 37.9%, p < 0.0001), and had shorter OS. While mastectomy rates were similar, those with ILC who underwent lumpectomy had significantly higher positive margin rates (ILC 15.7% versus IDC 11.2%, p = 0.025). In both groups, the odds of undergoing surgery decreased over time, and were higher in younger patients with T2/T3 tumors and higher nodal burden.ConclusionLobular histology is associated with less primary site surgery, higher positive margin rates, less radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and shorter OS compared to those with HR-positive HER2-negative IDC. These findings support the need for ILC-specific data and treatment approaches in the setting of metastatic disease.

Unfolding the role of the PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway in male breast cancer: A pragmatic appraisal

Breast cancer in men is rare, but a relevant public health issue, yielding a 25% higher risk of mortality comparing to female counterparts. The representation of males in clinical trials has been scarce and treatment decisions are based mainly on extrapolations from data in females. In the setting of estrogen-dependent metastatic disease, the use of everolimus has been seldom reported, although the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway seems to be a critical oncogenic driver. This paper dissects hallmark biological features of ER+/HER2-advanced male breast cancer, setting a comprehensive basis to promote personalized care, focusing on the potential of targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.

Utility of GLI1 RNA Chromogenic in Situ Hybridization in Distinguishing Basal Cell Carcinoma From Histopathologic Mimics

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignancy and is a leading cause of nonmelanoma skin cancer-related morbidity. BCC has several histologic mimics which may have treatment and prognostic implications. Furthermore, BCC may show alternative differentiation toward a variety of cutaneous structures. The vast majority of BCCs harbor mutations in the hedgehog signaling pathway, resulting in increased expression of the GLI family of transcription factors. GLI1 immunohistochemistry has been shown to discriminate between several tumor types but demonstrates high background signal and lack of specificity. In this study, we evaluated the utility of GLI1 RNA chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) as a novel method of distinguishing between BCC and other epithelial neoplasms. Expression of GLI1 by RNA CISH was retrospectively evaluated in a total of 220 cases, including 60 BCCs, 37 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) including conventional, basaloid, and human papillomavirus infection (HPV)-associated tumors, 16 sebaceous neoplasms, 10 Merkel cell carcinomas, 58 benign follicular tumors, and 39 ductal tumors. The threshold for positivity was determined to be greater than or equal to 3 GLI1 signals in at least 50% of tumor cells. Positive GLI1 expression was identified in 57/60 BCCs, including metastatic BCC, collision lesions with SCC, and BCCs with squamous, ductal, or clear cell differentiation or with other unusual features compared to 1/37 SCCs, 0/11 sebaceous carcinomas, 0/5 sebaceomas, 1/10 Merkel cell carcinomas, 0/39 ductal tumors, and 28/58 follicular tumors. With careful evaluation, GLI1 RNA CISH is highly sensitive (95%) and specific (98%) in distinguishing between BCC and nonfollicular epithelial neoplasms. However, GLI1 CISH is not specific for distinguishing BCC from most benign follicular tumors. Overall, detection of GLI1 RNA by CISH may be a useful tool for precise classification of histologically challenging basaloid tumors, particularly in the setting of small biopsy specimens, metaplastic differentiation, or metastatic disease.

Liquid Biopsy in NSCLC: An Investigation with Multiple Clinical Implications.

Tissue biopsy is essential for NSCLC diagnosis and treatment management. Over the past decades, liquid biopsy has proven to be a powerful tool in clinical oncology, isolating tumor-derived entities from the blood. Liquid biopsy permits several advantages over tissue biopsy: it is non-invasive, and it should provide a better view of tumor heterogeneity, gene alterations, and clonal evolution. Consequentially, liquid biopsy has gained attention as a cancer biomarker tool, with growing clinical applications in NSCLC. In the era of precision medicine based on molecular typing, non-invasive genotyping methods became increasingly important due to the great number of oncogene drivers and the small tissue specimen often available. In our work, we comprehensively reviewed established and emerging applications of liquid biopsy in NSCLC. We made an excursus on laboratory analysis methods and the applications of liquid biopsy either in early or metastatic NSCLC disease settings. We deeply reviewed current data and future perspectives regarding screening, minimal residual disease, micrometastasis detection, and their implication in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy management. Moreover, we reviewed liquid biopsy diagnostic utility in the absence of tissue biopsy and its role in monitoring treatment response and emerging resistance in metastatic NSCLC treated with target therapy and immuno-therapy.

Prevalence of primary malignant tumours, rates of pathological fracture, and mortality in the setting of metastatic bone disease.

The modern prevalence of primary tumours causing metastatic bone disease is ill-defined in the oncological literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the prevalence of primary tumours in the setting of metastatic bone disease, as well as reported rates of pathological fracture, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality for each primary tumour subtype. The Premier Healthcare Database was queried to identify all patients who were diagnosed with metastatic bone disease from January 2015 to December 2020. The prevalence of all primary tumour subtypes was tabulated. Rates of long bone pathological fracture, 90-day mortality, and 360-day mortality following surgical treatment of pathological fracture were assessed for each primary tumour subtype. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analyzed based upon whether patients had impending fractures treated prophylactically versus treated completed fractures. In total, 407,893 unique patients with metastatic bone disease were identified. Of the 14 primary tumours assessed, metastatic bone disease most frequently originated from lung (24.8%), prostatic (19.4%), breast (19.3%), gastrointestinal (9.4%), and urological (6.5%) malignancies. The top five malignant tumours resulting in long bone pathological fracture were renal (5.8%), myeloma (3.4%), female reproductive (3.2%), lung (2.8%), and breast (2.7%). Following treatment of pathological fractures of long bones, 90-day mortality rates were greatest for lung (12.1%), central nervous system (10.5%), lymphoma (10.4%), gastrointestinal (10.1%), and non-renal urinary (10.0%) malignancies. Finally, our study demonstrates improved 90-day and 360-day survival in patients treated for impending pathological fracture compared to completed fracture, as well as significantly lower rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and blood transfusion. This study defines the contemporary characteristics of primary malignancies resulting in metastatic bone disease. These data should be considered by surgeons when prognosticating patient outcomes during treatment of their metastatic bone disease.

Abstract IA017: Anticipating, tracking, and targeting new prostate cancer lineages driven by treatment pressures

Abstract Prostate cancer is notable for the near universal dependence on signaling pathways regulated by the androgen receptor (AR). For decades, this feature has served as the major focal point for prostate cancer treatment. However, in the setting of advanced metastatic disease, AR pathway repression is not curative and treatment resistance occurs universally. Emerging mechanisms of resistance to AR-directed therapy involve changes in tumor cell phenotypes where AR-regulated differentiation programs are repressed and new lineage programs are activated. This presentation will discuss the lineage types that have been recognized in model systems and in clinical tumors, describe approaches to monitor patients for the development/emergence of new therapy-induced lineages, and discuss treatment strategies that target new characteristics and vulnerabilities that accompany these new lineages. Citation Format: Peter S. Nelson. Anticipating, tracking, and targeting new prostate cancer lineages driven by treatment pressures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Prostate Cancer Research; 2023 Mar 15-18; Denver, Colorado. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(11 Suppl):Abstract nr IA017.

Phase I study of adoptive T cell therapy following HER2-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine and pepinemab/trastuzumab in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (MBC).

TPS1113 Background: Despite major improvement of overall survival of HER2+ MBC with effective HER2 targeted therapies, many patients experience significant toxicities and develop progressive disease during treatment. Therefore, new and more effective therapeutic options are needed. This novel approach will evaluate whether the combination of three immunotherapies in addition to trastuzumab: dendritic cell (DC) vaccination, anti-SEMA4D blocking antibody (pepinemab) and CD4+ T cell adoptive transfer can lead to improved outcomes for patients with MBC refractory to HER2-targeted agents. BC have been considered as immunologically cold which is attributed to immune evasion and suppression of host effector immune cells homing into tumor bed. Progressive loss of Th1 immunity against HER2 oncodriver correlates with poor prognosis. HER2 peptide pulsed type I dendritic cells (HER2-DC1) restored anti-HER2 CD4+ Th1 immune response and improved pathologic complete response (pCR) in HER2+ BC. Antibodies to SEMA4D have been shown to modulate the TME by increasing effector cell infiltration and reducing immunosuppression. In preclinical studies, treatment with anti-SEMA4D and HER2-DC1 in mice bearing established HER2+ tumors improved DC homing, expansion of CD4+ T cells, and complete tumor regression, compared to treatment with anti-SEMA4D or HER2-DC1 alone. Further, subsequent expansion and adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells induced synergistic anti-tumor activity by activating CD8+ T mediated cytotoxicity. Pepinemab was well-tolerated and showed signs of anti-tumor activity in in immunotherapy-resistant and PD-L1 negative/low non-small cell lung cancer patients when combined with checkpoint inhibitor (avelumab). Methods: This open label Phase 1 study is enrolling up to 28 patients with HER2+ MBC. Patients will be treated with 6 weekly injections of dendritic cell (DC1) vaccines in combination with trastuzumab and pepinemab. We hypothesize these therapies may elicit CD4+ HER2-specific T cell responses. HER2-specific T cells will be expanded ex vivo and subsequently infused to patients following lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide. Trastuzumab and pepinemab will be given as maintenance in addition to booster DC1 vaccines. Patients (ECOG 0,1) must have had disease progression while on trastuzumab for the treatment of HER2+ MBC and received no more than 3 lines of chemotherapy in the setting of metastatic disease. Dose escalation will consist of 3-6 patients each with increasing amounts of transferred CD4+ T cells, followed by dose expansion of 10 patients at the MTD. The primary objective is safety and tolerability; secondary objectives will include evaluation of T cell immunity and immune subsets, efficacy, PK/PD/ADA of pepinemab, and biomarker assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT05378464 .

Development of a CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate for triple-negative and metastatic breast cancer.

e15012 Background: CUB-domain containing- protein 1 (CDCP1) is a transmembrane receptor involved in the progression of several cancers. Recent studies demonstrate that CDCP1 is a rational target for the development of innovative targeted therapies for cancer including theranostics agents and antibody-drug conjugates. Methods: To determine the therapeutic potential of CDCP1 in breast cancer, we investigated its expression in multiple cohorts of breast cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry, as well as in various preclinical models including cell lines, primary cells and patient-derived xenografts using flow cytometry, western blot and immunofluorescence staining. Then, we evaluated the capacity of the CDCP1-targeting chimeric antibody ch10D7 to specifically accumulate in breast cancer lesions in in vivo preclinical models including patient-derived xenografts and breast cancer metastasis models. Finally, we determined the efficacy of the ch10D7-MMAE antibody-drug conjugate to kill breast cancer cells in vitro and breast tumours ex-vivo and in vivo. Results: The CDCP1 receptor is expressed at targetable level in a significant proportion of breast cancer cases with high/intermediate expression detected in ~30% of localized ER-positive cases, ~50% of metastatic ER-positive cases and &gt; 70% of Triple-negative or HER2-positive cases. Similar proportion of expression was detected in cellular models. We demonstrated that ch10D7 antibody labelled with the radionucleotide Zircodium-89 specifically accumulates in breast cancer lesions in vivo allowing the detection of mammary-fat pad implanted patient-derived xenografts and of breast cancer metastasis by PET/CT imaging. Finally, we confirmed that the ch10D7-MMAE antibody-drug conjugate is very efficient at inducing cell death in vitro as well as controlling primary tumour and metastatic tumour burden in pre-clinical models, conferring a significant survival advantage compared to classical therapy. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that CDCP1 is a potential target to detect and limit the progression of breast tumours in both the primary and metastatic disease setting, particularly in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes. Furthermore, we show that biomolecules specifically recognising this receptor are promising therapeutic agents which could improve survival of patients.

Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy versus no local treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in Chile, with 8157 new cases in 2020. Worldwide, 5 to 10% of men have metastatic disease at diagnosis, and androgen deprivation therapy with or without chemotherapy is the standard of care for these patients. The use of local treatment in this setting has no formal recommendation due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Some retrospective studies have sought to elucidate the benefit of surgery on the primary tumor in the setting of metastatic disease since it has been proven to be an effective local treatment for other metastatic malignant diseases. Despite these efforts, the benefit of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy as local treatment in these patients remains unclear. We searched Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from systematic reviews, reanalyzed data from primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis, and generated a summary results table using the GRADE approach. We identified 12 systematic reviews, including seven studies in total, none of which was a trial. Only six of those seven primary studies were used in the results summary. Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, the results summary shows the benefits of performing surgery on the primary tumor in terms of all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and disease progression. There was also a potential benefit in local complications related to the progression of the primary tumor, supporting the implementation of this intervention in patients with metastatic disease. The absence of formal recommendations highlights the need to evaluate the benefits of surgery on a case-by-case basis, presenting the available evidence to patients for a shared decision-making process and considering future local complications that could be difficult to manage.

China special issue on gastrointestinal tumors-Cetuximab retreatment plus camrelizumab and liposomal irinotecan in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Cohort B of the phase II CRACK study.

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have poor long-term survival. Rechallenge with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) based therapy has shown certain activity as late-line therapy. To further improve clinical outcomes, we evaluated the antitumor efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with camrelizumab and liposomal irinotecan in patients with RASwt mCRC pretreated with anti-EGFR-based therapy. Patients with RASwt mCRC who had received at least two prior systemic therapies, including anti-EGFR-based treatment in the metastatic or unresectable disease setting, were enrolled in cohort B. Patients were treated with cetuximab (500 mg/m2 ) and camrelizumab (200 mg) plus liposomal irinotecan (HR070803, 60 mg/m2 ) intravenously once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. At the data cutoff (23 November 2022), 19 patients were enrolled in the two stages, and 16 were evaluable for efficacy analyses. The ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.2%-49.5%), and DCR was 75% (95% CI: 50.5%-89.8%). The median PFS and OS were 6.9 (95% CI: 2.6-11.2) and 15.1 (95% CI: 6.1-24.0) months, respectively. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15.8% (3/19) of patients. No grade ≥4 TRAEs were found in the safety population. Our study suggests that anti-EGFR retreatment therapy with cetuximab plus camrelizumab and liposomal irinotecan (HR070803) is a promising late-line treatment option with good antitumor activity and well-tolerated toxicity in RASwt mCRC patients.