Sessile Serrated Adenomas Research Articles

In vivo evaluation of complex polyps with endoscopic optical coherence tomography and deep learning during routine colonoscopy: a feasibility study.

Standard-of-care (SoC) imaging for assessing colorectal polyps during colonoscopy, based on white-light colonoscopy (WLC) and narrow-band imaging (NBI), does not have sufficient accuracy to assess the invasion depth of complex polyps non-invasively during colonoscopy. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a custom endoscopic optical coherence tomography (OCT) probe for assessing colorectal polyps during routine colonoscopy. Patients referred for endoscopic treatment of large colorectal polyps were enrolled in this pilot clinical study, which used a side-viewing OCT catheter developed for use with an adult colonoscope. OCT images of polyps were captured during colonoscopy immediately before SoC treatment. A deep learning model was trained to differentiate benign from deeply invasive lesions for real-time diagnosis. 35 polyps from 32 patients were included. OCT imaging added on average 3:40min (range 1:54-8:20) to the total procedure time. No complications due to OCT were observed. OCT revealed distinct subsurface tissue structures that correlated with histological findings, including tubular adenoma (n = 20), tubulovillous adenoma (n = 10), sessile serrated polyps (n = 3), and invasive cancer (n = 2). The deep learning model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.984 (95%CI 0.972-0.996) and Cohen's kappa of 0.845 (95%CI 0.774-0.915) when compared to gold standard histopathology. OCT is feasible and safe for polyp assessment during routine colonoscopy. When combined with deep learning, OCT offers clinicians increase confidence in identifying deeply invasive cancers, potentially improving clinical decision-making. Compared to previous studies, ours offers a nuanced comparison between not just benign and malignant lesions, but across multiple histological subtypes of polyps.

Endoscopic characteristics to differentiate SSLs and microvesicular hyperplastic polyps from goblet cell-rich hyperplastic polyps.

Background and study aims Among colorectal serrated polyps (SPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and hyperplastic polyps (HPs) have a similar endoscopic appearance. However, the endoscopic distinctions between those two categories, microvesicular HPs (MVHPs) and goblet cell-rich HPs (GCHPs), are not well understood. Therefore, we compared the endoscopic features of SSLs, MVHPs, and GCHPs. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic. We examined polyp size, location, Paris classification type, mucus cap, indistinct border, expanded crypt opening, varicose microvascular vessels, and JNET classification type. Multivariable analysis of each endoscopic finding using a binomial logistic regression model determined the factors that predicted SP histology. Results A total of 670 SPs were enrolled in this study, comprising 159 SSLs, 361 MVHPs, and 150 GCHPs. On comparing the SSL + MVHP group and the GCHP group, a mucus cap (partial regression coefficient 1.705), expanded crypt opening (1.828), and varicose microvascular vessels (1.270) were more often observed in the SSL + MVHP group compared with the GCHP group. In the comparison between MVHPs and GCHPs, a mucus cap (1.564), expanded crypt opening (1.802), and varicose microvascular vessels (1.288) were more often found in MVHPs in contrast to GCHPs. When comparing SSLs and MVHPs, SSLs were more likely to be in the proximal colon (0.662) and were larger (0.198) than the MVHPs. No significant differences were observed in other endoscopic findings. Conclusions SSLs and MVHPs have endoscopic appearances that differ from those of GCHPs. Considering MVHPs and GCHPs as distinct entities may aid in endoscopic diagnosis of SPs.

Overweight and obesity are associated with colorectal neoplasia in an Australian outpatient population.

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related deaths within the Australian population. Colonoscopy and polypectomy represent effective forms of prevention. Factors such as diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia have been linked to adenoma development across a range of ethnicities, however there are limited data from the Australian population. This study investigates established and potential risk factors for early colorectal neoplasia in an Australian population. This was a prospective, observational case-control study in subjects aged 20-85 years, referred for outpatient colonoscopy. Clinical, anthropometric, and biochemical variables were collected at baseline. Polyps were classified as conventional adenomas or sessile serrated lesions, and correlated with clinical and biochemical variables. The study included 357 subjects, median age 55 years (IQR: 43.0-64.0), and 52.9% were female. 41.7% had metabolic syndrome. Multiple positive associations were observed in those over 40 years and with a BMI ≥ 25, including any polyp (aOR: 2.26; 95%CI: 1.22-4.18); adenoma (aOR: 2.64; 95%CI: 1.31-5.31); and, non-advanced adenoma (aOR: 2.66; 95%CI: 1.25-5.68). Our study demonstrates that elevated BMI is an independent risk factor for colorectal neoplasia in Australians undergoing colonoscopy. Further efforts should be focused on both diet and weight optimization in the general population given these findings and the recent national statistics indicating that almost two-thirds of the population are either overweight or obese.

Endoscopic management of multiple sessile serrated lesions in both the ileocecal region and the appendix cavity.

Endoscopic management of multiple sessile serrated lesions in both the ileocecal region and the appendix cavity.

Risk Factors Associated with Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Adults Younger than Age 45.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising in young adults between ages 20 to 49 years. CRC screening is endorsed for average-risk individuals beginning at ages 45 to 49 years. Targeting screening for individuals <45 years may be warranted if risk factors for advanced neoplasia can be identified. To identify factors associated with advanced colorectal neoplasia in adults aged <45 years. Individuals ages 18 to 44 years who underwent colonoscopy at Cleveland Clinic between 2011 and 2021 with ≥1 advanced neoplasm (AN) were included. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or inherited CRC syndromes were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, family history of CRC, and colonoscopy indication were obtained. Patients with a normal colonoscopy constituted the control group. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship between clinical variables and the presence of advanced colorectal neoplasia. In all, 13,006 patients were included, of which 651 (5%) patients had AN: 404 (62%) with tubular adenoma ≥10mm, 29 (4.5%) tubular adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, 210 (32%) tubulovillous adenomas, 27 (4%) traditional serrated adenomas, 82 (13%) sessile serrated lesions ≥10mm, 7(2%) sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia, and 29 (4.4%) patients had a CRC. Factors associated with AN were older age (means 38.5 vs. 36.6y), history of smoking, diabetes, non-White race, higher body mass index (29.9 vs. 28.5kg/m 2 ), and lower vitamin D (27.6 vs. 32.2 ng/dl), all P <0.001. In the reduced multivariable model, factors associated with AN included tobacco use (OR 2.026 (current vs. never, P <0.0001), age (OR increase by 1.06 per year, P <0.0001), male gender (OR 1.476, P <0.0001), family history of CRC (OR 3.91, P <0.0001), aspirin use (1.31, P =0.035), and diabetes (OR 2.106, P 0.001). Increasing age, male gender, exposure to tobacco, family history of CRC, diabetes, and aspirin use were independently associated with advanced neoplasia in adults younger than 45. Targeted early screening to young adults with these risk factors may be justified. Large collaborative prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Impact of linked color imaging on the proximal adenoma miss rate: a multicenter tandem randomized controlled trial (the COCORICO trial).

Missed lesions are common during standard colonoscopy and are correlated with post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Contrast-enhanced technologies have recently been developed to improve polyp detection. We aimed to evaluate the impact of linked color imaging (LCI) on the proximal adenoma miss rate in routine colonoscopy. This national, multicenter, tandem, randomized trial compared the outcomes of colonoscopy with white-light imaging (WLI) versus LCI for polyp detection in the right colon. Two consecutive examinations of the right colon (upstream of the hepatic flexure) were made with WLI and LCI by the same operator. First-pass examination by WLI or LCI was randomized 1:1 after cecal intubation. According to statistical calculations, 10 endoscopy units had to include approximately 700 patients. The primary outcome was proximal adenoma miss rate. Secondary outcomes were the proximal miss rates for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), advanced adenomas, and polyps. 764 patients were included from 1 January 2020 to 22 December 2022, and 686 patients were randomized (345 WLI first vs. 341 LCI first). Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics and indications. The proximal adenoma miss rate was not significantly higher in the WLI-first group (36.7%) vs. the LCI-first group (31.8%) (estimated mean absolute difference: 4.9% [95%CI -5.2% to 15.0%], P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in miss rates for SSLs, advanced adenomas, and polyps in the proximal colon. In contrast to previous data, this study does not support the benefit of LCI to the proximal adenoma miss rate in routine colonoscopy.

How to "pick up" colorectal serrated lesions and polyps in daily histopathology practice: From terminologies to diagnostic pitfalls.

Over the last decade, our knowledge of colorectal serrated polyps and lesions has significantly improved due to numerous studies on this group of precursor lesions. Serrated lesions were misleading as benign before 2010, but they are currently reclassified as precancerous lesions that contribute to 30% of colorectal cancer through the serrated neoplasia pathway. The World Health Organization updated the classification for serrated lesions and polyps of the colon and rectum in 2019, which is more concise and applicable in daily practice. The responsible authors prescribe that "colorectal serrated lesions and polyps are characterized by a serrated (sawtooth or stellate) architecture of the epithelium." From a clinical standpoint, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) and SSL with dysplasia (SSLD) are the two most significant entities. Despite these advancements, the precise diagnosis of SSL and SSLD based mainly on histopathology remains challenging due to various difficulties. This review describes the nomenclature and the terminology of colorectal serrated polyps and lesions and highlights the diagnostic criteria and obstacles encountered in the histopathological diagnosis of SSL and SSLD.

Comparative outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading lesions in inflammatory bowel disease.

The role of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial despite its effectiveness in the general population. We aimed to characterize outcomes of EMR for IBD-associated LSLs compared with controls without IBD. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with IBD who underwent EMR and endoscopic follow-up for LSLs, compared with a control group without IBD. The primary outcome was histologic recurrence. Secondary outcomes included en bloc resection and adverse events. Factors associated with recurrence were identified using multivariate mixed effects logistic regression. 210 premalignant lesions in 155 patients were included. By histology, 91.0% were adenoma/low grade dysplasia or sessile serrated lesions. Median (IQR) lesion size was 25 (12-30) mm in the IBD group and 20 (12-30) mm in the control group. Recurrence was detected in 30.4% of IBD-associated lesions (7/23) compared with 20.9% of controls (39/187; odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95%CI 0.59-10.71). En bloc resection was less common in the IBD group (2/23 [8.7%], 95%CI 1.1-28.0) versus controls (106/187 [56.7%], 95%CI 50.4-65.2). After adjusting for lesion size and histology, recurrence appeared more common in patients with IBD compared with controls (OR 3.08, 95%CI 1.04-9.13). Recurrence of LSLs after EMR appeared to be more frequent in patients with IBD. Given the added complexity, EMR in patients with IBD should be performed in expert centers with close endoscopic surveillance.

Performance of Computer-Aided Detection and Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Colonoscopy Outcomes

BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for detecting and characterizing colorectal polyps during colonoscopy, offering potential enhancements in traditional colonoscopy procedures to improve outcomes in patients with inadequate bowel preparation.AimsThis study aimed to assess the impact of an AI tool on computer-aided detection (CADe) assistance during colonoscopy in this population.MethodsThis case–control study utilized propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, race, and colonoscopy indication to analyze a database of patients who underwent colonoscopy at a single tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2023. Patients were excluded if the procedure was incomplete or aborted owing to poor preparation. The patients were categorized based on the use of AI during colonoscopy. Data on patient demographics and colonoscopy performance metrics were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare the groups.ResultsAfter PSM patients with adequately prepped colonoscopies (n = 1466), the likelihood of detecting hyperplastic polyps (OR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.7–2.5, p < 0.001), adenomas (OR = 1.47, 95%CI 1.19–1.81, p < 0.001), and sessile serrated polyps (OR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.20–3.03, p = 0.007) significantly increased with the inclusion of CADe. In inadequately prepped patients (n = 160), CADe exhibited a more pronounced impact on the polyp detection rate (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 1.6–6.16, p = 0.049) and adenomas (OR = 2.9, 95%CI 2.20–8.57, p < 0.001), with a marginal increase in withdrawal and procedure times.ConclusionThis study highlights the significant improvement in detecting diminutive polyps (< 5 mm) and sessile polyps using CADe, although notably, this benefit was only seen in patients with adequate bowel preparation. In conclusion, the integration of AI in colonoscopy, driven by artificial intelligence, promises to significantly enhance lesion detection and diagnosis, revolutionize the procedure’s effectiveness, and improve patient outcomes.

Impact of User's Background Knowledge and Polyp Characteristics in Colonoscopy with Computer-Aided Detection.

We investigated how interactions between humans and computer-aided detection (CADe) systems are influenced by the user's experience and polyp characteristics. We developed a CADe system using YOLOv4, trained on 16,996 polyp images from 1,914 patients and 1,800 synthesized sessile serrated lesion (SSL) images. The performance of polyp detection with CADe assistance was evaluated using a computerized test module. Eighteen participants were grouped by colonoscopy experience (nurses, fellows, and experts). The value added by CADe based on the histopathology and detection difficulty of polyps were analyzed. The area under the curve for CADe was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.91). CADe assistance increased overall polyp detection accuracy from 69.7% to 77.7% (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.69 to 2.09). However, accuracy decreased when CADe inaccurately detected a polyp (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.87). The impact of CADe assistance was most and least prominent in the nurses (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.71 to 2.27) and the experts (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.74), respectively. Participants demonstrated better sensitivity with CADe assistance, achieving 81.7% for adenomas and 92.4% for easy-to-detect polyps, surpassing the standalone CADe performance of 79.7% and 89.8%, respectively. For SSLs and difficult-to-detect polyps, participants' sensitivities with CADe assistance (66.5% and 71.5%, respectively) were below those of standalone CADe (81.1% and 74.4%). Compared to the other two groups (56.1% and 61.7%), the expert group showed sensitivity closest to that of standalone CADe in detecting SSLs (79.7% vs 81.1%, respectively). CADe assistance boosts polyp detection significantly, but its effectiveness depends on the user's experience, particularly for challenging lesions.

Clinical characteristics of appendix orifice polyps and the effect endoscopic super minimally invasive treatment

To analyze the clinical characteristics of appendiceal orifice polyps and the effect of endoscopic super minimally invasive treatment. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the general situation (age and sex), the classification of appendiceal orifice polyps, the treatment method under endoscope, postoperative pathology and postoperative complications in patients who underwent resection of appendiceal orifice polyps at the Peking University First Hospital and the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. A total of 47 patients were included, consisting of 28 males and 19 females, with 35-86 (61±12) years. Appendiceal orifice polyps were classified into four types: type 0 (14 cases), type 1 (15 cases), type 2 (12 cases), and type 3 (6 cases). Among the endoscopic morphologies, 22 cases were granular laterally spreading tumors. Endoscopic mucosal dissection was performed in 37 cases. Postoperative appendiceal stent placement was performed in 1 case. The pathological types of polyps included adenoma in 15 cases, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 10 cases, intramucosal carcinoma in 4 cases, submucosal carcinoma in 5 cases, inflammatory polyps in 1 cases, and sessile serrated lesion in 12 cases. Curative resection was performed in 44 cases. There were no postoperative complications such as bleeding, perforation, or acute appendicitis. The pathology of appendiceal polyps is mostly precancerous lesions, and the treatment scheme of endoscopic super minimally invasive resection is both safe and effective.

FP4.9 - Adherence to post Colonic polypectomy surveillance guidelines

Abstract Aims The British Society of Gastroenterology updated its guidelines in 2020 regarding polyps follow-up following colonoscopy. The surveillance depends on type, size, number, and histology criteria. Our aim was to assess adherence of our hospital's endoscopy department to these new guidelines. Methods A retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult patients who underwent colonoscopy were included between January and March 2022 at our hospital. Data were collected and analyzed on excel. The endoscopy report was identified from MediLogik-EMS.Histology from PICS system. Demographics including the specialty of endoscopist was also included. Non-parametric data were expressed in their Median and IQR. Results Out of the 108 patients examined 50/108 (49%) were found to have polyps and were included in the analysis. F: M =1:2, median age 64 with IQR 18.5(59-77.5). Tubular adenoma was found in 58%, hyperplastic polyps in 12%, sessile serrated polyps in 10%, tubulovillous adenoma in 8%, adenocarcinoma in 8%, and inflammatory polyps in 4%. Histopathology revealed tubular adenoma with LGD in 58%, inflammatory polyps in 16%, adenocarcinoma in 8%. Polyps were removed using cold biopsy in 58% and hot snare in 38%. BSG guidelines were followed in 92% (46/50). The reason for not adherence was either histologically incomplete excision, requiring a site check within 2-6 months which was not performed in6%(3)or high-risk features requiring 3 yearly surveillance colonoscopy follow-ups not requested in 2%(1). Conclusion There is high adherence to the guidelines but still not 100%. Our aim is to achieve 100% adherence in the re-audit.

Risk Factors for Serrated Polyps: Results From a Large, Multicenter Colonoscopy-Based Study.

Risk factors for serrated polyps (SPs) are not well understood. Multivariable analyses of data from a multicenter colonoscopy-based study estimated odds ratios for having either a sessile serrated lesion or traditional serrated adenoma according to participant characteristics. Six thousand seventy-eighty participants were included in the analyses (565 with either a sessile serrated lesion or traditional serrated adenoma). White race was associated with a higher risk of SPs compared with Black race (adjusted odds ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval 1.89-11.41). Obesity and current smoking were also associated with a higher risk of SPs. White race, smoking, and obesity are risk factors for precancerous SPs.

Protocol for a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) observation in the detection of colorectal lesions (deTXIon study).

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for detecting and resecting adenomas or early stage cancers to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer. In a recent observational study, texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) was reported to improve polyp detection during colonoscopy. This randomized controlled trial involving six Japanese institutions aims to confirm the superiority of TXI over standard white-light imaging (WLI) in detecting colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. During the 1-year study period, 960 patients will be enrolled, with 480 patients in the TXI and WLI groups. The primary endpoint is the mean number of adenomas detected per procedure. The secondary endpoints include adenoma detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, flat polyp detection rate, depressed lesion detection rate, mean polyps detected per procedure, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, mean SSLs detected per procedure and adverse events.

Current sessile serrated lesion incidence: implications for future clinical practice.

Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) account for up to 30% of colorectal carcinoma pathogenesis. With multiple classification changes and improvements in colonoscopy equipment and technique, historical reporting may have underestimated the true incidence of SSLs. This study aimed to determine the incidence of SSLs in patients undergoing colonoscopic investigation in Canterbury, New Zealand over a 1-year period and describe their clinical and pathological characteristics. Electronic records were searched to identify all lower endoscopy procedures with polypectomy performed from 1 January 2022 to 1 December 2022 (inclusive). Patients' electronic records were used to collect histological classification, location and size of each polyp removed during their procedure. The primary outcome was the number of procedures that had one or more SSL, adenoma or hyperplastic polyp identified. Secondary outcomes included histological classification, location and size of each polyp removed. There were 4346 procedures completed during the study period. Of these, 64.1% (2786) had a polypectomy and 18.6% (808) had at least one SSL excised. Individual polyp analysis was completed on 9166 polyps and found that 24.0% of polyps removed were SSLs and they were found predominately in the right colon (65.1% right colon, 32.6% left colon, 2.3% rectum). SSLs were typically <10 mm (84.8%). This study found a higher incidence of SSLs compared to previous research. These results raise questions regarding whether SLL rates have been historically underestimated, whether SSL detection rate should be included as a key performance indicator and raises further concerns regarding the use of computed tomography colonography as a screening tool.

Impact of the serrated pathwayon the simulated comparative effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening tests.

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) arise from adenomas, which can produce fecal occult blood and can be detected endoscopically, or sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), which rarely bleed and may be more challenging to detect. Models informing CRC screening policy should reflect both pathways, accounting for uncertainty. Novel decision-analytic model of the adenoma and serrated pathways for CRC (ANSER) to compare current and emerging screening strategies, accounting for differential test sensitivities for adenomas and SSLs, and uncertainty. Strategies included colonoscopy every 10 years, stool-DNA/FIT (sDNA-FIT) every 1-3 years, or fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) every year from age 45 to 75 years. Outcomes included CRC cases and deaths, cost-effectiveness (cost/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained), and burden-benefit (colonoscopies/life-year gained), with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). ANSER predicted 62.5 (95% UI = 58.8-66.3) lifetime CRC cases and 24.1 (95% UI = 22.5-25.7) CRC deaths/1000 45-year-olds without screening, and 78%-87% CRC mortality reductions with screening. The tests' outcome distributions overlapped for QALYs gained but separated for required colonoscopies and costs. All strategies cost less than $100 000/QALY gained vs no screening. Colonoscopy was the most effective and cost-effective, costing $9300/life-year gained (95% UI = $500-$21 900) vs FIT. sDNA-FIT cost more than $500 000/QALY gained vs FIT. As more CRCs arose from SSLs, colonoscopy remained preferred based on clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness, but cost-effectiveness improved for a next-generation sDNA-FIT. When the serrated pathway is considered, modeling suggests that colonoscopy is cost-effective vs FIT. In contrast, modeling suggests that sDNA-FIT is not cost-effective vs FIT despite its greater sensitivity for SSLs, even if a substantial minority of CRCs arise from SSLs.

Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasia in Young Adults With Advanced Neoplasia Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Comparison of Risk by Age

The risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (mACRN) in young adults with advanced lesions at baseline colonoscopy is not well defined. To examine the risk for (mACRN) in adults <50 years old who had advanced neoplasia (AN) at baseline colonoscopy and determine factors associated with mACRN in these patients. Patients 18 to 49 years of age with ≥1 AN [tubular adenoma (TA) ≥10mm or with villous features or high-grade dysplasia (HGD), sessile serrated lesion (SSL) ≥10mm or with dysplasia, traditional serrated adenoma (TSA)] on baseline colonoscopy between 2011 and 2021 who had surveillance colonoscopy >6 months after their baseline examination were included. Outcomes were assessed based on age at baseline colonoscopy, <45 years versus 45 to 49 years, and by follow-up colonoscopy findings: (1) normal, (2) nonadvanced neoplasia (NAN), and (3) AN. Three hundred sixty-six patients with AN underwent ≥1 surveillance colonoscopy: 310 (84.7%) <45 years versus 56 (15.3%) 45 to 49 years. The mean follow-up time was longer for the <45-year-olds versus the 45 to 49-year-olds (43±26.4 vs. 28.4±12.8mo respectively, P<0.001). The absolute risk of mACRN was 13.5% in the <45 age group versus 16.1% in the 45 to 49 age group, P=0.28. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates of mACRN were comparable for patients <45 and 45 to 49 years old: 10% (95% CI: 10% to 42%) versus 20% (95% CI: 7% to 15%), P=0.065. BMI was the only risk factor associated with mACRN OR 1.045 [95% CI (1.001 to 1.09)]. In our cohort of patients <50 years old with AN at baseline, mACRN occurred at a similar rate to that reported by guidelines in 50 years and older, suggesting that current recommended post polypectomy surveillance is appropriate for this age group. BMI was independently associated with mACRN. Future studies should examine how weight management in patients with high BMI mitigates the recurrence of advanced neoplasia.

Representation of Racial Minorities in the United States Colonoscopy Surveillance Interval Guidelines.

Clinical guidelines should ideally be formulated from data representative of the population they are applicable to; however, historically, studies have disproportionally enrolled non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients, leading to potential inequities in care for minority groups. Our study aims to evaluate the extent to which racial minorities were represented in the United States Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Guidelines. We reviewed US guidelines between 1997 and 2020 and all identified studies cited by recommendations for surveillance after a baseline colonoscopy with no polyps, adenomas, sessile serrated polyps, and hyperplastic polyps. We analyzed the proportion of studies reporting race, and among these studies, we calculated the racial distribution of patients and compared the proportion of Non-NHW patients between each subtype. For all guidelines, we reviewed 75 studies encompassing 9,309,955 patients. Race was reported in 24% of studies and 14% of total patients. Non-NHW comprised 43% of patients in studies for normal colonoscopies, compared with 9% for adenomas, 22% for sessile serrated polyps, and 15% for hyperplastic polyps. For the 2020 guidelines, we reviewed 33 studies encompassing 5,930,722 patients. Race was reported in 15% of studies and 21% of total patients. Non-NHW comprised 43% of patients in studies for normal colonoscopies, compared with 9% for tubular adenomas. Race was not cited for any other 2020 guideline. Racial minorities are significantly underrepresented in US Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Guidelines, which may contribute to disparities in care. Future studies should prioritize enrolling a diverse patient population to provide data that accurately reflects their population.

Additional 30-second observation of the right-sided colon for missed polyp detection with linked color imaging compared with narrow band imaging

Background and study aims: We previously demonstrated the efficacy of an additional-30-seconds (Add-30s) observation with linked color imaging (LCI) or narrow band imaging (NBI) of the cecum and ascending colon (right-sided colon) after white light imaging (WLI) observation for improving adenoma detection rate (ADR) by 3% to 10%. We herein compared Add-30s LCI with Add-30s NBI in a large number of cases. Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected 1023 and 1011 cases with Add-30s LCI and NBI observation for right-sided colon in 11 affiliated institutions from 2018 to 2022 and propensity score matching was performed. Add-30s observation was as follows. First observation: WLI observation of the right-sided colon as first observation. Second observation: Reobservation of right-sided colon by Add-30s LCI or NBI. The comparison of the mean numbers of adenoma+sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and adenomas per patient (MASP and MUTYH-associated polyposis) were analyzed in the Add-30s LCI/NBI groups. The increase in right-sided ADR was also analyzed in the groups. Results: Among 748 matched cases in the Add-30s LCI/NBI groups, the MASP and MAP were 0.18/0.19 (P = 0.54) and 0.14/0.15 (P = 0.70). Among experts, they were 0.17/0.22 (P = 0.16) and 0.15/0.21 (P = 0.08). Among non-experts, they were 0.13/0.12 (P = 0.71) and 0.12/0.07 (P = 0.04). The right-sided ADRs of the first+second observations in the LCI and NBI groups were 32.2% and 28.9% (P = 0.16) and the increase of ADRs were 7.5% and 7.2% (P = 0.84). Conclusions: In right-sided colon, the detection of adenoma/SSL did not differ between Add-30s LCI and NBI. Both of them significantly increased ADR.

Effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy system for adenoma detection: a prospective, propensity score-matched, non-randomized controlled study in Korea.

The real-world effectiveness of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems during colonoscopies remains uncertain. We assessed the effectiveness of the novel CADe system, ENdoscopy as AI-powered Device (ENAD), in enhancing the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and other quality indicators in real-world clinical practice. We enrolled patients who underwent elective colonoscopies between May 2022 and October 2022 at a tertiary healthcare center. Standard colonoscopy (SC) was compared to ENAD-assisted colonoscopy. Eight experienced endoscopists performed the procedures in randomly assigned CADe- and non-CADe-assisted rooms. The primary outcome was a comparison of ADR between the ENAD and SC groups. A total of 1,758 sex- and age-matched patients were included and evenly distributed into two groups. The ENAD group had a significantly higher ADR (45.1% vs. 38.8%, p=0.010), higher sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) (5.7% vs. 2.5%, p=0.001), higher mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) (0.78±1.17 vs. 0.61±0.99; incidence risk ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.42), and longer withdrawal time (9.0±3.4 vs. 8.3±3.1, p<0.001) than the SC group. However, the mean withdrawal times were not significantly different between the two groups in cases where no polyps were detected (6.9±1.7 vs. 6.7±1.7, p=0.058). ENAD-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved the ADR, APC, and SSLDR in real-world clinical practice, particularly for smaller and nonpolypoid adenomas.