IgM Seroconversion Research Articles

Presence of dengue virus RNA in urine and oral fluid of laboratory-confirmed dengue patients: Implications for wastewater surveillance

IntroductionDengue cases in the Americas in 2024 have reached record highs, especially in Brazil. However, surveillance remains suboptimal and new methods are needed to monitor Dengue Virus (DENV) spread. To assess whether wastewater-based epidemiology would be a useful tool, we investigated the presence of DENV RNA in dengue patients’ urine and oral fluid from an endemic area to inform how shedding in these fluids occurs and provide insight for wastewater surveillance. MethodsWe examined how often DENV RNA is detected in urine and oral fluid from dengue patients confirmed by serum RT-qPCR, NS1 ELISA or IgM seroconversion in Salvador, Brazil. ResultsOf 88 confirmed cases, 9.1 % were positive for DENV RNA in urine (7/88) or oral fluid (1/88). Of 53 serum RT-qPCR-positive patients, 6 (11.3 %) showed detectable DENV RNA in acute- or convalescent-phase urine. Patients with RT-qPCR-positive urine had a lower frequency of DENV IgG in acute-phase serum (a proxy for secondary infection) (57 % vs. 74 %) and a lower median serum RT-qPCR cycle threshold than those with negative urine (21.8 vs. 23.9). ConclusionThe low presence of DENV RNA in urine suggests that additional research is needed to evaluate whether using wastewater-based epidemiology to monitor DENV transmission is possible.

COVID-19 antibody responses in individuals with natural immunity and with vaccination-induced immunity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused a large mortality and morbidity burden globally. For individuals, a strong immune response is the most effective means to block SARS-CoV-2 infection. To inform clinical case management of COVID-19, development of improved vaccines, and public health policy, a better understanding of antibody response dynamics and duration following SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination is imperatively needed.MethodsWe systematically analyzed antibody response rates in naturally infected COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals. Specifically, we searched all published and pre-published literature between 1 December 2019 and 31 July 2023 using MeSH terms and “all field” terms comprising “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2,” and “antibody response” or “immunity response” or “humoral immune.” We included experimental and observational studies that provided antibody positivity rates following natural COVID-19 infection or vaccination. A total of 44 studies reporting antibody positivity rate changes over time were included.ResultsThe meta-analysis showed that within the first week after COVID-19 symptom onset/diagnosis or vaccination, antibody response rates in vaccinated individuals were lower than those in infected patients (p < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed from the second week to the sixth month. IgG, IgA, and IgM positivity rates increased during the first 3 weeks; thereafter, IgG positivity rates were maintained at a relatively high level, while the IgM seroconversion rate dropped.ConclusionsAntibody production following vaccination might not occur as quickly or strongly as after natural infection, and the IgM antibody response was less persistent than the IgG response.

Detection of Chikungunya Virus RNA in Oral Fluid and Urine: An Alternative Approach to Diagnosis?

To evaluate whether oral fluids (OF) and urine can serve as alternative, non-invasive samples to diagnose chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection via RT-qPCR, we employed the same RNA extraction and RT-qPCR protocols on paired serum, OF and urine samples collected from 51 patients with chikungunya during the acute phase of the illness. Chikungunya patients were confirmed through RT-qPCR in acute-phase sera (N = 19), IgM seroconversion between acute- and convalescent-phase sera (N = 12), or IgM detection in acute-phase sera (N = 20). The controls included paired serum, OF and urine samples from patients with non-arbovirus acute febrile illness (N = 28) and RT-PCR-confirmed dengue (N = 16). Nine (47%) of the patients with positive RT-qPCR for CHIKV in sera and two (17%) of those with CHIKV infection confirmed solely via IgM seroconversion had OF positive for CHIKV in RT-qPCR. One (5%) patient with CHIKV infection confirmed via serum RT-qPCR was positive in the RT-qPCR performed on urine. None of the negative control group samples were positive. Although OF may serve as an alternative sample for diagnosing acute chikungunya in specific settings, a negative result cannot rule out an infection. Further research is needed to investigate whether OF and urine collected later in the disease course when serum becomes RT-qPCR-negative may be helpful in CHIKV diagnosis and surveillance, as well as to determine whether urine and OF pose any risk of CHIKV transmission.

Evaluation of Dengue, Zika virus, and Chikungunya virus transmission by blood components in recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Brazil has a high prevalence of arboviruses, especially Dengue (DENV), Zika (ZKV), and Chikungunya (CHKV). To study the risk of DENV, ZKV, and CHKV transmission by blood components in the haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) population. Prospective cohort of HSCT recipients and donors performed at the Hospital das Clinicas da FMUSP, São Paulo-Brazil. Patients were evaluated by serology and RT-PCR for DENV, ZKV, and CHKV pre-transplantation and once a week until neutrophil grafting. In positive cases (positive RT-PCR and/or serology conversion), an investigation was carried out on the blood components that the patient received to evaluate the possibility of it being transfusion transmitted. A total of 93 patients were included during the study period. The mean age was 52 years with a predominance of males (56.9%). We considered five (5.3%) DENV cases positive by seroconversion in our study. One patient had IgM seroconversion and the other four presented IgG seroconversion to DENV. In the investigation of the blood components, 145 individual samples were analysed. None of the investigated blood components showed a positive RT-PCR. We observed a low prevalence of DENV, ZKV, and CHKV in HSCT donors and recipients by serology and RT-PCR, and no case of blood transfusion transmission by RT-PCR.

Utility of Borrelia-specific IgM and IgG antibody titer determinations during a 12-year period - results from a clinical laboratory in Northern Sweden.

Interpretation of serological findings in suspected Lyme borreliosis (LB) is challenging and IgM reactivities may have low predictive value. Therefore, if used indiscriminately, there is a risk for incorrect diagnosis of LB. To evaluate the usefulness of IgM titer determination, we performed a study of the prevalence of Borrelia-specific antibodies in serological samples from patients with suspected LB analyzed during the period 2010 - 2021 at the University Hospital of Umeå in Sweden. In total, 19,335 samples had been analyzed for the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies. Overall, there were higher percentages of IgM positive or borderline titers, 1,847 (9.6%) and 905 (4.7%), respectively, than IgG positive or borderline titers, 959 (5.0%) and 406 (2.1%), respectively. Peak number of samples were recorded 2012 - 2013, exceeding 1,800, whereas there were around 1,200 during 2020 - 2021. The peak number of positive IgG and/or positive IgM samples were observed during the period 2015 - 2017 with close to, or above 400, and concomitantly, the proportion of IgG positive samples increased markedly. For IgG positive samples, the increase followed a positive linear time trend (P< 0.001). Peak monthly numbers were observed during August, September, and October. This seasonal increase was significant for the IgG positive group (P< 0.05), but not for the IgM positive/IgG negative group. Repeated samples were obtained from 3,188 individuals and of the initial samples 2,817 were (88%) IgG negative and 2,315 (72%) were IgM negative and of these, 130 (4%) showed IgG seroconversion and 300 (9%) IgM seroconversion. Collectively, the data demonstrate that IgG and/or IgM positive samples represented a minority of all samples, even when repeated sampling had occurred, and IgM positive samples were much more common than IgG positive samples. Thus, the accuracy of the clinical suspicion was low and this will lead to a low predictive value of the analysis, in particular of IgM. These findings question the use of IgM titer determination as a routine analysis.

SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Seroconversion in Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Cancer Center

Background:&#x0D; Implementation of strict measures to ensure the safety of cancer patients during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic includes modification of treatment plans, strict physical distancing measures between healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients alike, and early detection of suspected cases. Serological testing can identify immunological responses, i.e., seroconversion, in HCWs presenting with subclinical symptoms. The detection of immunoglobulin (Ig) M specific antibodies demonstrates active disease, while (Ig) G specific antibodies indicate previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2.&#x0D; &#x0D; Methods:&#x0D; Among HCWs in a tertiary cancer center in Jordan, a cross-sectional study was conducted to detect those who had positive serology albeit previous negative diagnosis with COVID-19. We sent an invitation e-mail, and those who met the criteria were invited to a privately designated room to sign an informed consent form and obtain a blood sample for analysis. Results and demographic data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4.&#x0D; &#x0D; Findings:&#x0D; We recruited 583 participants between December 2020 and January 2021, with an equal distribution between genders and a mean age of 34.04 years (±9.29). The majority of participants were from the nursing department (n=390, 66.89%). A history of an upper respiratory tract infection was reported by 144 individuals (24.7%) with varying symptoms. Positive exposure was reported in 441 participants (75.6%). IgG seroconversion was detected in 41 participants (7%), while IgM seroconversion was only detected in three (0.5%).&#x0D; &#x0D; Interpretation:&#x0D; There was no correlation between positive IgG seroconversion and history of upper respiratory tract infection, exposure to infected patients, or profession. Therefore, subclinical COVID-19 is hard to detect, facilitating transmission of infection. Alongside polymerase chain reaction testing, strict physical distancing, and prompt vaccination among HCWs to mitigate disease spread, frequent serological surveillance can offer a way to understand the number of infections at different times and locations within different populations.

Detection of IgM, IgG, IgA and neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA vaccination.

Introduction. One correlate of immunity for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the laboratory detection of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. These tests are widely implemented for clinical, public health, or research uses.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Antibody responses by all classes of immunoglobulins may form from infection and vaccination, but few studies have performed direct head-to-head comparisons between these groups.Aim. The objective of this study was to evaluate the serological responses in natural SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA-based vaccination across multiple immunoglobulin classes and a surrogate neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay.Methodology. A suite of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) was used to qualitatively assess IgA, IgM and IgG positivity and neutralizing per cent signal inhibition of sera from RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, COVID-19-immunized individuals ≥2 weeks after a second dose of mRNA vaccine and a set of pre-pandemic negative samples.Results. For confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, seroconversion of IgA, IgM, IgG and NAb increased by week after symptom onset, with positivity reaching 100 % after the third week for every immunoglobulin class. Vaccinated individuals demonstrated 100 % IgG positivity and high per cent signal inhibition by NAb, comparable to natural infection. High specificity, ranging from 96.7-98.9 %, was observed for each assay from a set of pre-pandemic COVID-19-negative samples.Conclusion. We make use of a comprehensive and readily adoptable suite of serological assays to provide data on the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We found that infection and vaccination both elicit robust IgG, IgM, IgA and neutralizing antibody responses.

Ultrasensitive monitoring of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses based on a digital approach reveals one week of IgG seroconversion

COVID-19 is still unfolding, while many people have been vaccinated. In comparison to nucleic acid testing (NAT), antibody-based immunoassays are faster and more convenient. However, its application has been hampered by its lower sensitivity and the existing fact that by traditional immunoassays, the measurable seroconversion time of pathogen-specific antibodies, such as IgM or IgG, lags far behind that of nucleic acids. Herein, by combining the single molecule array platform (Simoa), RBD, and a previously identified SARS-CoV-2 S2 protein derivatized 12-aa peptide (S2-78), we developed and optimized an ultrasensitive assay (UIM-COVID-19 assay). Sera collected from three sources were tested, i.e., convalescents, inactivated virus vaccine-immunized donors and wild-type authentic SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus monkeys. The sensitivities of UIM-COVID-19 assays are 100–10,000 times higher than those of conventional flow cytometry, which is a relatively sensitive detection method at present. For the established UIM-COVID-19 assay using RBD as a probe, the IgG and IgM seroconversion times after vaccination were 7.5 and 8.6 days vs. 21.4 and 24 days for the flow cytometry assay, respectively. In addition, using S2-78 as a probe, the UIM-COVID-19 assay could differentiate COVID-19 patients (convalescents) from healthy people and patients with other diseases, with AUCs ranging from 0.85–0.95. In summary, the UIM-COVID-19 we developed here is a promising ultrasensitive biodetection strategy that has the potential to be applied for both immunological studies and diagnostics.

Investigation of Rickettsia conorii in Patients Suspected of Having Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever.

Rickettsia conorii is the causative agent of Mediterranean spotted fever (MSF). Misdiagnosis of MSF may occur with febrile syndromes associated with rash and thrombocytopenia, such as Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of R. conorii among serum samples obtained from 260 suspected CCHF patients with features of MSF in Iran (2018–2020). The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method detected three (1.15%) positive 16S rDNA Rickettsia spp. samples that were classified as R. conorii subsp. conorii, R. conorii subsp. Israelensis, and R. helvetica using the sequencing of gltA, ompA, and 17kDa genes. Furthermore, R. conorii IgM antibodies presented in 38 (14.62%) patients by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Out of 97 MSF patients with available paired serum samples, IgM seroconversion and a four-fold increase were observed in 14 (14.43%) and 12 (12.37%) patients, respectively. We concluded that rickettsial agents are present in Iran and may be misdiagnosed with other febrile syndromes.

SARS-CoV-2 infection results in immune responses in the respiratory tract and peripheral blood that suggest mechanisms of disease severity

Respiratory tract infection with SARS-CoV-2 results in varying immunopathology underlying COVID-19. We examine cellular, humoral and cytokine responses covering 382 immune components in longitudinal blood and respiratory samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients. SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM, IgG, IgA are detected in respiratory tract and blood, however, receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific IgM and IgG seroconversion is enhanced in respiratory specimens. SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity in respiratory samples correlates with RBD-specific IgM and IgG levels. Cytokines/chemokines vary between respiratory samples and plasma, indicating that inflammation should be assessed in respiratory specimens to understand immunopathology. IFN-α2 and IL-12p70 in endotracheal aspirate and neutralization in sputum negatively correlate with duration of hospital stay. Diverse immune subsets are detected in respiratory samples, dominated by neutrophils. Importantly, dexamethasone treatment does not affect humoral responses in blood of COVID-19 patients. Our study unveils differential immune responses between respiratory samples and blood, and shows how drug therapy affects immune responses during COVID-19.

Cytokine response over the course of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women.

ObjectiveTo study how severity and progression of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) affect cytokine profiles in pregnant women.Materials and methods69 third-trimester, pregnant women were tested for COVID-19 infection and SARS-CoV-2 specific IgM and IgG antibodies. Patients were stratified according to SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) status and serology (IgM and IgG) status. Cytokines G-CSF, HGF, IL-18, IL-1Ra, IL-2Ra, IL-8, and IP-10 were measured via ELISA. Retrospective chart review for COVID-19 symptoms and patient vitals was conducted, and cytokine levels were compared between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative cohorts, by seronegative and seropositive infection, by time course since onset of infection, and according to NIH defined clinical severity.ResultsIL-18, IL-1Ra, and IP-10 increased in the 44 RT-PCR positive pregnant women compared to the 25 RT-PCR negative pregnant controls. Elevated cytokine levels were found in early infections, defined by positive RT-PCR and seronegative status, and higher cytokine levels were also associated with more severe disease. By IgM seroconversion, IL-8 and IP-10 returned to levels seen in uninfected patients, while IL-18 levels remained significantly elevated.ConclusionCytokine profiles of third-trimester pregnant women vary with the time course of infection and are correlated with clinical severity.

Effect of monoclonal antibody therapy on the endogenous SARS-CoV-2 antibody response

Monoclonal antibody treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been widely implemented. Effects of treatment on the endogenous primary humoral response to the virus are unknown. A retrospective cohort study performed at a Veterans Health Administration medical center compared serologic responses of treated and untreated COVID-19 patients at high risk for severe outcomes. Three anti-viral spike protein IgG monoclonal treatments were used during the study period, 1) bamlanivimab, 2) casirivimab with imdevimab, and 3) bamlanivimab with etesevimab. Data were analyzed at acute (0–9 days), seroconversion (10–19 days), and maximum antibody (20–39 days) stages. SARS-Cov-2 infection induced a dynamic primary humoral response with anti-spike IgM and anti-nucleocapsid IgG seroconversion occurring after 9 days with maximum serologic indices achieved by 20–39 days. All monoclonal antibody treatments suppressed the endogenous anti-spike IgM response by 85–90% with minor effect on the anti-nucleocapsid response. Thus, passive immunization therapy may cause immunologic interference.

Coinfection With SARS-CoV-2 and Dengue Virus: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges.

Since its emergence in China, SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 240 million people worldwide, including in regions where dengue virus (DENV) is hyperendemic such as Latin America and Southeast Asia, including Indonesia. Diagnosis of COVID-19 in dengue endemic regions as well as DENV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection can be challenging. We describe a 68-year-old woman with diabetes mellitus type II who was admitted to the Tangerang District Hospital on 14 April 2020. She lived in a neighborhood where a few people were contracting dengue fever. She presented with five days of fever, malaise, anorexia, nausea, myalgia, and arthralgia. Hematology revealed anemia, thrombocytopenia, normal leukocyte count, increased neutrophil proportion, and decreased lymphocyte proportion and absolute lymphocytes. Her chest X-ray showed right pericardial infiltrates. Although dengue was clinically suspected, she was also tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection as she met screening criteria. After being confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive by RT-PCR, she was treated with ceftriaxone, paracetamol, azithromycin, oseltamivir, and chloroquine. She was clinically improved four days later and discharged from the hospital on 25 April 2020 after SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was negative on two consecutive samples. Dengue was diagnosed retrospectively based on sero-conversion of dengue IgM and a very high dengue IgG index (ELISA, Focus Diagnostics®, Cypress, CA, USA), and sero-conversion of dengue IgM and positive IgG (Rapid test, PanBio ®Dengue duo cassette, Inverness Medical Innovations, QLD, AU), which was equivalent to high Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) antibody titer (≥1280) found in secondary dengue infection. The overlapping clinical presentations of COVID-19 and dengue; limited diagnostic capacity of laboratories in resource constrained settings; and complexities of interpreting results make identification of COVID-19 in the dengue endemic setting challenging. Clinicians in endemic areas must be aware of diagnostic challenges and maintain a high index of suspicion for COVID-19 coinfection with DENV and other tropical pathogens.

Investigation of Durability of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM Antibodies in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study.

Background:Evidence on seroconversion profile of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infected patients is limited. We mainly aimed to evaluate seroconversion and persistence of virus-specific antibodies in patients infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Methods:This prospective study was conducted on 118 patients with COVID-19 presentations admitted to three hospitals in Iran and recovered from the disease, during April and May 2020. Presence of COVID-19 was confirmed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing on nasopharyngeal swabs. Serum samples were collected at different time points, including 0–5, 6–15, 16–25, 26–35, and 36–95 days of clinical symptom onset. For measurement of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibody titers, Iran’s Food and Drug Administration-approved SARS-CoV-2 ELISA kits were used.Results:Serologic assay revealed that 37.3% of patients (n=44) were positive for IgM at 0–5 days interval after clinical symptom onset. This rate was 60.2% (n=71) for IgG. There were increasing IgM and IgG seroconversion rates during first 25 days of clinical symptom onset, but seropositivity started to decrease thereafter, which was more evident for IgM (17.9%) than IgG (58.9%) at the 36–95 days post symptoms appearance. In other words, it was found that 83.6% of IgM-positive and 32.9% of IgG-positive patients in the first month of clinical symptom onset became seronegative in the third month of clinical symptom onset.Conclusion:The findings demonstrated that antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection were developed in recovered COVID-19 patients; however, some of them were seronegative three months after onset of relevant symptoms. Furthermore, the stability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could also correct our expectations from COVID-19 vaccination responses.

Response kinetics of different classes of antibodies to SARS-CoV2 infection in the Japanese population: The IgA and IgG titers increased earlier than the IgM titers

To better understand the immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in individuals with COVID-19, it is important to investigate the kinetics of the antibody responses and their associations with the clinical course in different populations, since there seem to be considerable differences between Western and Asian populations in the clinical features and spread of COVID-19. In this study, we serially measured the serum titers of IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies generated against the nucleocapsid protein (NCP), S1 subunit of the spike protein (S1), and receptor-binding domain in the S1 subunit (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 in Japanese individuals with COVID-19. Among the IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies, IgA antibodies against all of the aforementioned viral proteins were the first to appear after the infection, and IgG and/or IgA seroconversion often preceded IgM seroconversion. In regard to the timeline of the antibody responses to the different viral proteins (NCP, S1 and RBD), IgA against NCP appeared than IgA against S1 or RBD, while IgM and IgG against S1 appeared earlier than IgM/IgG against NCP or RBD. The IgG responses to all three viral proteins and responses of all three antibody classes to S1 and RBD were sustained for longer durations than the IgA/IgM responses to all three viral proteins and responses of all three antibody classes to NCP, respectively. The seroconversion of IgA against NCP occurred later and less frequently in patients with mild COVID-19. These results suggest possible differences in the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 antigens between the Japanese and Western populations.

Hepatitis E virus infection and rejection in kidney transplant recipients

BackgroundHepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been associated with immune-mediated kidney diseases in developing countries. However, its relationship with kidney transplant outcomes has never been studied. We investigated the association between HEV infection and kidney graft rejection among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). MethodsWe conducted a matched cohort and longitudinal study utilizing banked sera following kidney transplantation during 1988–2012. Studies with evidence of post-transplantation HEV infection were identified by positive ELISA tests (anti-HEV IgM or anti-HEV IgG seroconversion) or positive HEV PCR and matched to KTR controls with negative HEV ELISA and PCR tests in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, crossmatch status, immunosuppression era, and time of HEV testing. Outcome data collected included time to first kidney graft rejection, transaminases, and glomerular filtration rates. Log-ranked test was used to analyze survival. ResultsOf 271 KTRs, 9 (3%) had evidence of post-transplantation HEV infection and were compared to 45 negative, matched controls. Median age at transplantation was 46 years. Kidney graft rejection was reported in 8 (89%) of cases and 21 (47%) of controls. Median time to first episode of kidney graft rejection was 17.4 months in cases and 30.8 months in controls (p = 0.029), with a higher hazard of developing kidney graft rejection in cases (HR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.19–8.79). Lower mean glomerular filtration rates over time were observed in cases (35 mL/min/1.73m2) versus controls (42.4 mL/min/1.73m2) but did not reach significance (p = 0.24). ConclusionSubjects with evidence of post-transplantation HEV infection demonstrated earlier kidney graft rejection compared to controls.

Seroconversion in septic ICU patients presenting with COVID-19: necessary but not sufficient

BackgroundAs COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination effects progress, research now focuses on adaptive immunological response to SARS-CoV-2. Few studies specifically investigated intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and little is known about kinetics of humoral response in such critically ill patients. In this context, the main objective of the present work was to perform a longitudinal analysis of the humoral response in critically ill COVID-19 patients with prolonged ICU stays in regard with initial inflammatory response, disease severity and mortality.MethodsOver a 3 week period, circulating immunoglobulins (Ig) against SARS-CoV-2 along with several immunological and clinical parameters were measured in 64 ICU COVID-19 patients.ResultsCritically ill COVID-19 patients mounted a dynamic and sustained antibody response of both IgM and IgG as soon as the first day of ICU hospitalization. This serological response was not associated with any of the classical immunological parameters measured at ICU admission or with initial severity clinical scores. IgM and IgG levels and seroconversion trajectories were not associated with unfavourable outcome.ConclusionDespite rapid seroconversion and elevated humoral response, COVID-19 patients are still characterized by elevated mortality. Additional studies, including cytotoxic T cell functions, are mandatory to understand the immunological mechanisms contributing to long stay of COVID-19 patients in ICU.

Monitoring Specific IgM and IgG Production Among Severe COVID-19 Patients Using Qualitative and Quantitative Immunodiagnostic Assays: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study is to monitor specific anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) IgG and IgM antibody production in patients with severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using various commercially available quantitative and qualitative tests. The sera of 23 confirmed COVID-19 patients were processed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM detection. Three different immunoassays, viz. Abbott Architect® SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, and two quantitative tests, ANSH® SARS-CoV-2 and AESKULISA® SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein (NP), were performed and the results pooled, from diagnosis to serum collection. Seroconversion rates were computed for all 3 assays, and possible correlations were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Overall, 70 combinations of qualitative and quantitative IgG and IgM results were pooled and analyzed. In the early phase (0-4 days after diagnosis), in all tests, IgG seroconversion rates were 43%-61%, and increased in all tests gradually to 100% after 15 days. The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a strong positive relationship between the qualitative IgG test results and both quantitative IgG tests. IgM detection was inconsistent, with maximal concentrations and seroconversion rates between 10-15 days after diagnosis and slight-to-fair agreement between the two quantitative immunoassays. There was no significant association between mortality with IgG or IgM seroconversion or concentrations. Patients with severe COVID-19 develop an early, robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral immune response involving IgG immunoglobulins. Further comparative studies are warranted to analyze the value of serological testing in predicting the severity of COVID-19 and detecting prior exposure.

SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies and Associated Factors at Different Hospitalization Time Points in 192 COVID-19 Cases.

BackgroundWe launched a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 192 patients with COVID-19, aiming to depict the kinetic profile of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and explore the factors related to SARS-CoV-2 antibody expression.MethodsData on 192 confirmed patients with COVID-19 between January and February 2020 was collected from the designated hospital that received patients with COVID-19 in Guangzhou, China. Moreover, a cohort of 130 suspected patients with COVID-19 and 209 healthy people were also enrolled in this study. IgM and IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detected by the chemiluminescence immunoassay kits in different groups.ResultsA total of 192 COVID-19 cases were analyzed, of which had 81.8% anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM detected and 93.2% anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG detected, respectively, at the time of sampling. The kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG showed that, the confirmed cases had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM seroconversion occurred 5–10 days after the onset of the symptoms, and then IgM rose rapidly to reach a peak within around 2–3 weeks, maintaining at its peak for 1 week before its decline. While they had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion simultaneously or sequentially with IgM, reaching its peak within around 3 to 4 weeks and began to decline after the fifth week. Besides, correlation analysis showed that in patients with COVID-19 the level of IgM was related to gender and disease severity (P < 0.01), and the level of IgG was related to age and disease severity (P < 0.001). The univariate analysis of relevant factors indicated that the level of IgG had a weak correlation with age (r = 0.374, P < 0.01). The level of IgM in male patients was higher than that in female patients (P < 0.001). The expression level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG were positively correlated with the severity of COVID-19 and the duration of the virus in the patients.ConclusionThe findings of this study show that anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG can be important assisting COVID-19 diagnosis, especially in the early phase of infection. Furthermore, antibody expression in patients with COVID-19 is also correlated with disease severity, age, gender, and virus clearance or continuous replication.

Retrospective of International Serological Studies on the Formation and Dynamics of the Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2: from 2020 to 2021

Last year the COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has started. The new coronavirus is highly contagious and causes severe complications. The mechanisms of humoral immunity and kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in a population are not well understood. Therefore, we aimed to summarize and analyze numerous global and Russian serological studies for understanding dynamics of the SARSCoV-2 humoral immune response and getting an accurate picture of the seroprevalence to SARS-CoV-2 in the world population. The PubMed and e-library databases were searched from February 2020 to March 2021 using terms “SARSCoV-2”, “antibodies”, “humoral immunity”. At the beginning of the pandemic first studies were cross-sectional by design and were responsible for determination of the seropositivity and for understanding the fundamental humoral immunity parameters of SARS-CoV-2. Since then, longitudinal seroepidemiological studies have been studying antibody kinetics. Seroconversion time for IgM, IgG antibodies varies, but most researchers report the seroconversion of IgM from the 1st to 14th days after the onset of clinical manifestations, and the seroconversion for IgG is around the 14th day with a concentration peak by the 21st day. Regarding seroprevalence we may say about low herd immunity at the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, global seroprevalence is about 10 %, and more than 20 % for regions with high incidence and among healthcare workers. Seroprevalence studies have to be continued for more accurate monitoring of long-term humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2, because the majority of the world’s population is still susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection.