Seretide Diskus Research Articles

Novel Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Fixed-Dose Combination Nano-Encapsulated Particles Using Polyamide Based on L-Lysine.

One of the key challenges in developing a dry powder inhaler (DPI) of an inhalable potent fixed-dose combination (FDC) is the ability of the formulation to generate an effective and reproducible aerosol able to reach the lower parts of the lungs. Herein, a one-step approach is presented to expedite the synthesis of nanoaggregates made from a biocompatible and biodegradable polyamide based on L-lysine amino acid employing market-leading active pharmaceutical ingredients (fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol xinafoate (SAL)) for the management of asthma. The nanoaggregates were synthesized using interfacial polycondensation that produced nanocapsules with an average particle size of 226.7 ± 35.3 nm and zeta potential of −30.6 ± 4.2 mV. Differential scanning calorimetric analysis and x-ray diffraction, as well as scanning electron microscopy of the produced FDC, revealed the ability of the produced nanocapsules to encapsulate the two actives and display the best aerodynamic performance. The FDC nanocapsules displayed 88.5% and 98.5% of the emitted dose for FP and SAL, respectively. The fine particle fraction of the nominated dose was superior to the marketed product (Seretide Diskus®, Brentford, United Kingdom). The in-vitro release study showed an extended drug release profile. Our findings suggest that nanoaggregates using polyamides based on L-lysine and interfacial polycondensation can serve as a good platform for pulmonary drug delivery of FDC systems.

Patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can generate sufficient inspiratory flows via Easyhaler® dry powder inhaler: a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

BackgroundTo evaluate whether patients of varying ages and lung function with asthma or those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can achieve sufficient inspiratory flows for effective use of the fixed-dose combination of salmeterol-fluticasone propionate and budesonide-formoterol dispensed with the Easyhaler® (EH) device-metered, multi-dose dry powder inhaler (DPI).MethodsA pooled analysis of two randomized, multicenter, crossover, open-label studies (NCT01424137; NCT009849061) was conducted to characterize inspiratory flow parameters across the EH, Seretide Diskus (DI) and Symbicort Turbuhaler (TH) inhalers in patients with asthma and/or COPD of varying severity. The primary endpoint was peak inspiratory flow (PIF) rate through the EH.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population comprised 397 patients; 383 patients were included in the per-protocol (PP) population. The mean PIF (standard deviation) values through the EH in patients <18 and ≥18 years of age with asthma and in those with COPD, were similar: 61.4 (11.5), 69.7 (13.5), and 61.9 (13.2) L/min, respectively. These flow rates correspond to pressure drops of 5.05 (1.80), 6.52 (2.34) and 5.19 (2.07) kPa, respectively. In total, 380 (99.2%) of patients in the PP population were able to generate a PIF rate through the EH of ≥30 L/min, which is required to enable consistent dose delivery from the DPI; there was a moderate direct association between age and PIF in younger patients with asthma, but this was inverse and less apparent in adult patients with asthma and/or those with COPD. Height and weight were also moderately correlated with PIF. Stronger associations with PIF were observed for some lung function parameters, particularly native PIF and forced inspiratory vital capacity.ConclusionsOver 99% of patients with asthma and/or COPD were able to inhale through the EH with an adequate PIF rate, irrespective of age, or severity of airway obstruction. This confirms that patients with asthma and/or COPD can achieve inspiratory flows via the EH DPI that are sufficient for its effective use.

Ar sausųjų miltelių inhaliatoriai, turintys itin smulkias aerozolio daleles, gali pagerinti vaisto depoziciją plaučiuose?

Siekiant kuo geresnės astmos ir lėtinės obstrukcinės plaučių ligos (LOPL) kontrolės, vis labiau didėja susidomėjimas itin smulkių dalelių aerozoliais, kurie nukreipti į smulkiuosius kvėpavimo takus. Įvertinus anksčiau paskelbtus vaistų depozicijos plaučiuose tyrimų duomenis, buvo pradėta aiškintis, ar dalelės, kurių skersmuo mažesnis nei 1 μm, gali pagerinti vaisto depoziciją periferiniuose kvėpavimo takuose. A. H. Boer apžvalgoje, įvertinus daugelį tyrimų bei palyginus Symbicort® TurbuHaler®, Seretide Diskus® ir Foster® NEXThaler® sausųjų miltelių inhaliatorius, įrodyta, kad 1–3 μm dalelės yra daug veiksmingesnės depozicijai plaučiuose.

Budget Impact Analysis of Treatment with Ultibro Breezhaler® Versus Seretide Diskus® 50/500 Μg for Moderate to Very Severe COPD Patients

To assess the budget impact of COPD management with Ultibro Breezhaler® (UB) vs. Seretide Diskus® 50/500 µg (SD) in France over the next 6 years based on the results of the FLAME study. A budget impact model was developed to estimate healthcare savings of a broader use of UB vs. SD in the treatment of patients with moderate to very severe COPD (25% ≤ post bronchodilator FEV1 < 60%), who had at least one exacerbation in the previous year and an mMRC≥2. Pneumonia (severe and non-severe) and exacerbations (moderate and severe) rates from the 52-weeks-duration FLAME study were used. The model used management costs (€, 2016) of COPD (treatments, management of exacerbations and pneumonia). For each stay, a DRG cost (€, 2014) was calculated. No discount rate was applied. The mean cost of treatment combined with the impact of exacerbations and the management of adverse events decreased by 137€ per patient per year (1405€ with SD vs. 1268€ with UB). Based on French guidelines (SPLF, 2016), we estimated that 250 000 patients needed a 2nd line of treatment for the prevention of exacerbations among 2.5 millions of COPD patients in France. A linear growth of UB market shares for these patients from 8% (actual) to 50%, for instance, would allow to save 70M€ (cumulated) for French NHS over the next 6 years. Currently, French NHS spends 3.5 billions euros every year for the management of COPD in France. From the French NHS perspective, replacing SD by UB in the COPD treatment strategy of patients with moderate to very severe COPD who had at least an exacerbation in the previous year with an mMRC≥2 could generate substantial savings.

Comparative Analysis of Persistence to Treatment among Patients with Asthma or COPD Receiving AirFluSal Forspiro or Seretide Diskus Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination Therapy

Low adherence and persistence to inhaled therapy result in poor outcomes in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although adherence has been widely studied, growing awareness of the large number of patients who abandon their asthma treatment suggests that persistence to treatment may be more relevant for longer term outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare persistence to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination treatment as AirFluSal Forspiro with persistence to Seretide Diskus in patients with asthma or COPD aged 12 years and above. This study analyzed dispensing data from a large German pharmacy database. Male and female patients who were prescribed AirFluSal Forspiro were randomly paired with those who were prescribed Seretide Diskus controlling for month of treatment initiation (to limit potential seasonality effects), age groups, and gender. Matched patient pair analysis was conducted on a total of 11,774 patients (45.1% male) to compare persistence between the 2 products. The survival probability estimates at 12 months were 0.229 (0.02 standard error) for AirFluSal Forspiro versus 0.105 (0.025 standard error) for Seretide Diskus. The Renyi family of tests demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P = .01) in persistence to AirFluSal Forspiro compared with Seretide Diskus in the overall survival experience of the 2 populations. In this large retrospective pharmacy database analysis, patients using AirFluSal Forspiro were more likely to persist with treatment compared with those using Seretide Diskus as demonstrated by the overall survival experience of the 2 populations (12-month study period). These new data provide a basis for further research to better understand persistence behavior and to develop strategies to address poor persistence.

Effect of Flow Rate on In Vitro Aerodynamic Performance of NEXThaler® in Comparison with Diskus® and Turbohaler® Dry Powder Inhalers

Background: European and United States Pharmacopoeia compendial procedures for assessing the in vitro emitted dose and aerodynamic size distribution of a dry powder inhaler require that 4.0 L of air at a pressure drop of 4 kPa be drawn through the inhaler. However, the product performance should be investigated using conditions more representative of what is achievable by the patient population. This work compares the delivered dose and the drug deposition profile at different flow rates (30, 40, 60, and 90 L/min) of Foster NEXThaler® (beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate), Seretide® Diskus® (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate), and Symbicort® Turbohaler® (budesonide/formoterol fumarate).Methods: The delivered dose uniformity was tested using a dose unit sampling apparatus (DUSA) at inhalation volumes either 2.0 or 4.0 L and flow rates 30, 40, 60, or 90 L/min. The aerodynamic assessment was carried out using a Next Generation Impactor by discharging each inhaler at 30, 40, 60, or 90 L/min for a time sufficient to obtain an air volume of 4 L.Results: Foster® NEXThaler® and Seretide® Diskus® showed a consistent dose delivery for both the drugs included in the formulation, independently of the applied flow rate. Contrary, Symbicort® Turbohaler® showed a high decrease of the emitted dose for both budesonide and formoterol fumarate when the device was operated at airflow rate lower that 60 L/min. The aerosolizing performance of NEXThaler® and Diskus® was unaffected by the flow rate applied. Turbohaler® proved to be the inhaler most sensitive to changes in flow rate in terms of fine particle fraction (FPF) for both components. Among the combinations tested, Foster NEXThaler® was the only one capable to deliver around 50% of extra-fine particles relative to delivered dose.Conclusions: NEXThaler® and Diskus® were substantially unaffected by flow rate through the inhaler in terms of both delivered dose and fine particle mass.

Can ‘extrafine’ dry powder aerosols improve lung deposition?

There is increasing interest in the use of so-called ‘extrafine’ aerosols to target the small airways in the management of asthma and COPD. Using previously presented deposition data, we assessed whether submicron (<1μm) particles can improve central and deep lung deposition. Our data show instead that particles in the range 1–3μm are much more relevant in this respect. Based on this finding the Symbicort Turbuhaler, Seretide Diskus, Rolenium Elpenhaler and Foster (Fostair) NEXThaler ICS/LABA combination DPIs were tested in vitro as a function of the pressure drop (2, 4 and 6kPa) across the inhaler. Obtained fine particle fractions (FPFs) <5μm (as percent of label claim) were divided into subfractions <1, 1–3 and 3–5μm. Differences of up to a factor of 4 were found between the best (Turbuhaler) and worst performing DPI (Elpenhaler), particularly for the FPF in the size range 1–3μm. The NEXThaler, described as delivering ‘extrafine’ particles, did not appear to be superior in this size range. The marked differences in amount and size distribution of the aerosols between the devices in this study must cause significant differences in the total lung dose and drug distribution over the airways.

Pitfalls associated with the therapeutic reference pricing practice of asthma medication

BackgroundTherapeutic reference pricing (TRP) based on the WHO daily defined dose (DDD) is a method frequently employed for the cost-containment of pharmaceuticals. Our objective was to compare average drug use in the real world with DDD and to evaluate whether TRP based on DDD could result in cost savings on maintenance medication and the total direct health expenditures for asthma patients treated with Symbicort Turbuhaler (SYT) and Seretide Diskus (SED) in Hungary.MethodsReal-world data were derived from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund database. Average doses and costs were compared between the high-dose and medium-dose SYT and SED groups. Multiple linear regressions were employed to adjust the data for differences in the gender and age distribution of patients.Results27,779 patients with asthma were included in the analysis. Average drug use was lower than DDD in all groups, 1.38-1.95 inhalations in both SED groups, 1.28-1.97 and 1.74-2.49 inhalations in the medium and high-dose SYT groups, respectively. Although the cost of SED based on the DDD would be much lower than the cost of SYT in the medium-dose groups, no difference was found in the actual cost of the maintenance therapy. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of total medical costs.ConclusionsCost-containment initiatives by payers may influence clinical decisions. TRP for inhalation asthma drugs raises special concern, because of differences in the therapeutic profile of pharmaceuticals and the lack of proven financial benefits after exclusion of the effect of generic price erosion. Our findings indicate that the presented TRP approach of asthma medications based on the daily therapeutic costs according to the WHO DDD does not result in reduced public healthcare spending in Hungary. Further analysis is required to show whether TRP generates additional expenditures by inducing switching costs and reducing patient compliance. Potential confounding factors may limit the generalisability of our conclusions.

Budesonide/Formoterol Maintenance and Reliever Therapy in Asian Patients (Aged ≥16 Years) with Asthma

The combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), budesonide, and a rapid long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA), formoterol, in a single inhaler for use as maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort Turbuhaler SMART™) effectively achieves a high level of asthma control and reduces exacerbations and asthma-related hospitalizations. The COSMOS study, a multinational, 12-month study (N = 2143), compared budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate plus as-needed salbutamol, allowing physicians to modify maintenance doses of both combinations according to routine clinical practice. The aim of this post hoc sub-group analysis of the COSMOS study is to provide focused data on budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy compared with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate plus as-needed salbutamol in patients (aged ≥16 years) enrolled across Asian countries, specifically China, Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. This sub-analysis of the COSMOS study concerns all 404 randomized patients ≥16 years of age (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] 69.1%) who were recruited from Asian countries. Patients received either budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler SMART™, n = 198), starting dose 160 mg/4.5 mg two inhalations twice daily (bid) [plus additional as-needed inhalations], or salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretide(®) Diskus(®), n = 206), starting dose 50 mg/250 mg bid (plus salbutamol [Ventolin(®)] as needed). Maintenance doses could be titrated by clinicians after the first 4 weeks (budesonide/formoterol maintenance plus as needed, n = 198; salmeterol/fluticasone propionate plus salbutamol, n = 206). To allow for free adjustment in maintenance doses in both arms, the trial was performed open-label; maintenance doses could be titrated by clinicians after the first 4 weeks. The time to first severe exacerbation (defined as deterioration in asthma resulting in hospitalization/emergency room treatment, oral corticosteroids for ≥3 days or unscheduled visit leading to treatment change) was the primary variable. The time to first severe exacerbation was prolonged in patients using maintenance plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol compared with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate plus salbutamol (log-rank p = 0.024). The risk of a first exacerbation was reduced by 44% (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32, 0.95; p = 0.033) in patients using the adjusted budesonide/formoterol regimen versus titrated salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. The overall exacerbation rates were 0.16 versus 0.26 events/patient-year, respectively, with a 38% reduction (rate ratio 0.62/patient/year; 95% CI 0.41, 0.94; p = 0.024) in favour of the budesonide/formoterol regimen. Compared with baseline, both regimens provided clinically relevant improvements in asthma control, quality of life and FEV(1); no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were observed. Mean adjusted (standard deviation) ICS dose (expressed as beclomethasone dose equivalents) during treatment, including as-needed budesonide doses, was 944 (281) and 1034 (394) μg/day, respectively, in patients using maintenance plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol compared with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. In patients (aged ≥16 years) enrolled from Asian countries as part of the COSMOS study, the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever regimen was associated with a lower future risk of exacerbations versus the physicians' free choice of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate dose plus salbutamol. Single inhaler combination treatment with maintenance plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol was also at least as efficacious as salmeterol/fluticasone propionate dose plus salbutamol in improving current asthma control.

AnIn VivoandIn VitroComparison of Two Powder Inhalers following Storage at Hot/Humid Conditions

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are increasingly being used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. A potential drawback is that DPIs can be sensitive to humidity. Two DPIs, Symbicort Turbuhaler and Seretide Diskus, were stored 3 months at either 25 degrees C/30% RH or 40 degrees C/75% RH. After storage, delivered, as well as fine particle dose, FPD, were tested in vitro and lung deposition, of the steroid components, was assessed in vivo. After storage at 40 degrees C/75% RH, delivered dose as well as FPD from Symbicort Turbuhaler was virtually unchanged while FPD for Seretide Diskus decreased by about 50% despite no decrease in delivered dose. For both products, no difference in FPD was seen after storage at 25 degrees C/30% RH. These in vitro findings were confirmed in the in vivo part of the study. Lung deposition for Symbicort Turbuhaler was unaffected by 40 degrees C/75% RH storage, while for Seretide Diskus it was reduced with about 50%. The study extends previous in vitro observations of impaired performance of Seretide Diskus and demonstrates that this translates into decreased drug delivery to the site of action. The clinical importance of this finding has not been studied but could result in undertreatment.