Sequence-specific RNA-binding Proteins Research Articles

Chemi-Northern: a versatile chemiluminescent northern blot method for analysis and quantitation of RNA molecules.

This report describes a chemiluminescence-based detection method for RNAs on northern blots, designated Chemi-Northern. This approach builds on the simplicity and versatility of northern blotting, while dispensing of the need for expensive and cumbersome radioactivity. RNAs are first separated by denaturing gel electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon membrane, and then hybridized to a biotinylated RNA or DNA antisense probe. Streptavidin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase and enhanced chemiluminescence substrate are then used to detect the probe bound to the target RNA. Our results demonstrate the versatility of this method in detecting natural and engineered RNAs expressed in cells, including messenger and noncoding RNAs. We show that Chemi-Northern detection is sensitive and fast, detecting attomole amounts of RNA in as little as 1 sec, with high signal intensity and low background. The dynamic response displays excellent linearity. Using Chemi-Northern, we measure the reproducible, statistically significant reduction of mRNA levels by human sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins, PUM1 and PUM2. Additionally, we measure the interaction of the poly(A) binding protein, PABPC1, with polyadenylated mRNA. Thus, the Chemi-Northern method provides a versatile, simple, and cost-effective method to enable researchers to analyze expression, processing, binding, and decay of RNAs.

Improved modeling of RNA-binding protein motifs in an interpretable neural model of RNA splicing

Sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play central roles in splicing decisions. Here, we describe a modular splicing architecture that leverages in vitro-derived RNA affinity models for 79 human RBPs and the annotated human genome to produce improved models of RBP binding and activity. Binding and activity are modeled by separate Motif and Aggregator components that can be mixed and matched, enforcing sparsity to improve interpretability. Training a new Adjusted Motif (AM) architecture on the splicing task not only yields better splicing predictions but also improves prediction of RBP-binding sites in vivo and of splicing activity, assessed using independent data.

Cooperativity boosts affinity and specificity of proteins with multiple RNA-binding domains.

Numerous cellular processes rely on the binding of proteins with high affinity to specific sets of RNAs. Yet most RNA-binding domains display low specificity and affinity in comparison to DNA-binding domains. The best binding motif is typically only enriched by less than a factor 10 in high-throughput RNA SELEX or RNA bind-n-seq measurements. Here, we provide insight into how cooperative binding of multiple domains in RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) can boost their effective affinity and specificity orders of magnitude higher than their individual domains. We present a thermodynamic model to calculate the effective binding affinity (avidity) for idealized, sequence-specific RBPs with any number of RBDs given the affinities of their isolated domains. For seven proteins in which affinities for individual domains have been measured, the model predictions are in good agreement with measurements. The model also explains how a two-fold difference in binding site density on RNA can increase protein occupancy 10-fold. It is therefore rationalized that local clusters of binding motifs are the physiological binding targets of multi-domain RBPs.

Knockdown of CPEB1 and CPEB4 Inhibits Scar Formation via Modulation of TAK1 and SMAD Signaling.

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding (CPEB) proteins are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that control translation via cytoplasmic polyadenylation. We previously reported that CPEB1 or CPEB4 knockdown suppresses TAK1 and SMAD signaling in an in vitro study. This study aimed to investigate whether suppression of CPEB1 or CPEB4 expression inhibits scar formation in a mice model of acute dermal wound healing. CPEB1 and CPEB4 expression levels were suppressed by siRNA treatment. Skin wounds were created by pressure-induced ulcers in mice. Images of the wound healing were obtained using a digital camera and contraction was measured by ImageJ. mRNA and protein expression was analyzed using quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction and western blotting, respectively. Wound contraction was significantly decreased by pre-treatment with CPEB1 or CPEB4 siRNA compared to the control. Suppression of CPEB1 or CPEB4 expression decreased TAK1 signaling by reducing the levels of TLR4 and TNF-α, phosphorylated TAK1, p38, ERK, JNK, and NF-κB-p65. Decreased levels of phosphorylated SMAD2 and SMAD3 indicated a reduction in SMAD signaling as well. Consequently, the expression of α-SMA, fibronectin, and type I collagen decreased. CPEB1 siRNA or CPEB4 siRNA inhibit scar formation by modulating the TAK1 and SMAD signaling pathways. Our study highlights CPEB1 and CPEB4 as potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of scar formation.

Construction of a Versatile, Programmable RNA-Binding Protein Using Designer PPR Proteins and Its Application for Splicing Control in Mammalian Cells.

RNAs play many essential roles in gene expression and are involved in various human diseases. Although genome editing technologies have been established, the engineering of sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that manipulate particular cellular RNA molecules is immature, in contrast to nucleotide-based RNA manipulation technology, such as siRNA- and RNA-targeting CRISPR/Cas. Here, we demonstrate a versatile RNA manipulation technology using pentatricopeptide-repeat (PPR)-motif-containing proteins. First, we developed a rapid construction and evaluation method for PPR-based designer sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins. This system has enabled the steady construction of dozens of functional designer PPR proteins targeting long 18 nt RNA, which targets a single specific RNA in the mammalian transcriptome. Furthermore, the cellular functionality of the designer PPR proteins was first demonstrated by the control of alternative splicing of either a reporter gene or an endogenous CHK1 mRNA. Our results present a versatile protein-based RNA manipulation technology using PPR proteins that facilitates the understanding of unknown RNA functions and the creation of gene circuits and has potential for use in future therapeutics.

PMON29 A Comparative Analysis of Musashi-Dependent Control of Mouse and Human Pituitary mRNA Translation

Abstract Specialized cell lineages within the anterior pituitary produce specific hormones which, in turn, regulate diverse biological processes ranging from growth, metabolism, and reproduction to stress. Interestingly, these specialized cell lineages exhibit a high degree of cellular plasticity, readily altering their differentiation state to produce different hormones in response to organismal demand. Underlying molecular mechanisms controlling cellular plasticity in the pituitary are not fully defined but appear to involve post-transcriptional regulation exerted by the Musashi family of sequence-specific RNA binding proteins. Musashi is a bifunctional regulator of target mRNAs and can exert either repression or activation of translation in a context-dependent manner. Our recent work has implicated a role for Musashi-dependent repression of key pituitary mRNAs in the mouse, including a lineage-specific transcription factor (Pou1f1), the gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor (Gnrhr), and two anterior pituitary hormones (Prl and Tshb). In this study, we look to determine the potential relevance of Musashi-dependent mRNA translational control to the human pituitary. Reflecting our findings in the adult mouse, a re-analysis of published human fetal pituitary single cell RNA sequencing data revealed Musashi1 (MSI1) and Musashi2 (MSI2) expression in both stem/progenitor cell populations as well as in all hormone-producing cell lineages of the anterior pituitary. We further report that the human homologs of identified Musashi-target mRNAs in the mouse pituitary also possess Musashi binding elements (MBEs) in their 3' untranslated regions (UTRs). In the case of the human Pou1f1 3' UTR, we were able to verify Musashi-dependent mRNA translational repression in reporter assays as seen with the murine Pou1f1 3' UTR. Interestingly, a germline Pou1f1 mutation identified in human patients, disrupts a consensus MBE in the human Pou1f1 3' UTR and abolishes Musashi-dependent repression. We developed a bioinformatic pipeline to characterize pathogenic human mutations catalogued in the Geno2MP database for disruption or creation of consensus MBEs in pituitary-specific mRNA 3' UTRs. Our findings suggest an evolutionarily conserved role for Musashi in the post-transcriptional regulation of pituitary mRNAs in both mice and humans and identify several human mutations which may perturb Musashi regulation of human pituitary function. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

A Proposed Role for Interactions between Argonautes, miRISC, and RNA Binding Proteins in the Regulation of Local Translation in Neurons and Glia.

The first evidence of local translation in the CNS appeared nearly 40 years ago, when electron microscopic studies showed polyribosomes localized to the base of dendritic spines. Since then, local translation has been established as an important regulatory mechanism for gene expression in polarized or functionally compartmentalized cells. While much attention has been placed on characterizing the local transcriptome and regulatory "grammar" directing mRNA localization in neurons and glia, less is understood about how these cells subsequently de-repress mRNA translation in their peripheral processes to produce a rapid translational response to stimuli. MicroRNA-mediated translation regulation offers a possible solution to this question. Not only do miRNAs provide the specificity needed for targeted gene regulation, but association and dynamic interactions between Argonaute (AGO) with sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins may provide a molecular switch to allow for de-repression of target mRNAs. Here, we review the expression and activity of different AGO proteins in miRNA-induced silencing complexes in neurons and glia and discuss known pathways of miRNA-mediated regulation, including activity-dependent pre-miRNA maturation in dendrites. We further detail work on AGO and RNA-binding protein interactions that allow for the reversal of miRNA-mediated translational silencing, and we propose a model for how intercellular communication may play a role in the regulation of local translation.

The role of PPR proteins in posttranscriptional regulation of organelle components in plants.

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins constitute one of the largest protein families in land plants. They are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins and play key roles in posttranscriptional processes within organelles. Their combined actions have profound effects on chloroplast photosynthetic electron transport chain and mitochondrial respiratory chain, affecting photosynthesis and respiration respectively, and ultimately on yield, fertility, and grain quality. Over the past decade, much has been learned about the molecular functions of these proteins on plant growth and development. However, due to the large size of this protein family, the functions of most members remain largely unknown. Here, we summarize the molecular mechanisms of PPR proteins functions on organelle genes, and effects on development of organelles and plants. Problems that need to be resolved are also identified. This article will provide a theoretical basis for understanding the functions of PPR protein family and genetic improvements of grain yield and quality.

Functions of PPR Proteins in Plant Growth and Development.

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins form a large protein family in land plants, with hundreds of different members in angiosperms. In the last decade, a number of studies have shown that PPR proteins are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins involved in multiple aspects of plant organellar RNA processing, and perform numerous functions in plants throughout their life cycle. Recently, computational and structural studies have provided new insights into the working mechanisms of PPR proteins in RNA recognition and cytidine deamination. In this review, we summarized the research progress on the functions of PPR proteins in plant growth and development, with a particular focus on their effects on cytoplasmic male sterility, stress responses, and seed development. We also documented the molecular mechanisms of PPR proteins in mediating RNA processing in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Human Pumilio proteins directly bind the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex to regulate the transcriptome.

Pumilio paralogs, PUM1 and PUM2, are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that are essential for vertebrate development and neurological functions. PUM1&2 negatively regulate gene expression by accelerating degradation of specific mRNAs. Here, we determined the repression mechanism and impact of human PUM1&2 on the transcriptome. We identified subunits of the CCR4-NOT (CNOT) deadenylase complex required for stable interaction with PUM1&2 and to elicit CNOT-dependent repression. Isoform-level RNA sequencing revealed broad coregulation of target mRNAs through the PUM-CNOT repression mechanism. Functional dissection of the domains of PUM1&2 identified a conserved amino-terminal region that confers the predominant repressive activity via direct interaction with CNOT. In addition, we show that the mRNA decapping enzyme, DCP2, has an important role in repression by PUM1&2 amino-terminal regions. Our results support a molecular model of repression by human PUM1&2 via direct recruitment of CNOT deadenylation machinery in a decapping-dependent mRNA decay pathway.

The RNA-associated proteins MKT1 and MKT1L form alternative PBP1-containing complexes in Trypanosoma brucei

Control of gene expression in kinetoplastids such as trypanosomes depends heavily on RNA-binding proteins that influence mRNA decay and translation. We previously showed that the trypanosome protein MKT1 forms a multicomponent protein complex: MKT1 interacts with PBP1, which in turn recruits LSM12 and poly(A)-binding protein. MKT1 is recruited to mRNAs by sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins, resulting in stabilization of the bound mRNA. We here show that PBP1, LSM12, and a 117-residue protein, XAC1 (Tb927.7.2780), are present in complexes that contain either MKT1 or an MKT1-like protein, MKT1L (Tb927.10.1490). All five proteins are present predominantly in the complexes, and we found evidence for a minor subset of complexes containing both MKT1 and MKT1L. XAC1-containing complexes reproducibly contained RNA-binding proteins that were previously found associated with MKT1. Moreover, XAC1- or MKT1-containing complexes specifically recruited one of the two poly(A)-binding proteins, PABP2, and one of the six cap-binding translation initiation complexes, EIF4E6-EIF4G5. Yeast two-hybrid assay results indicated that MKT1 directly interacts with EIF4G5. MKT1-PBP1 complexes can therefore interact with mRNAs via their poly(A) tails and caps, as well as through sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins. Correspondingly, MKT1 is associated with many mRNAs, although not with those encoding ribosomal proteins. Meanwhile, MKT1L resembles MKT1 at the C terminus but additionally features an N-terminal extension with low-complexity regions. Although MKT1L depletion inhibited cell proliferation, we found no evidence that it specifically interacts with RNA-binding proteins or mRNA. We speculate that MKT1L may compete with MKT1 for PBP1 binding and thereby modulate the function of MKT1-containing complexes.

The RNA-binding protein PTBP1 promotes ATPase-dependent dissociation of the RNA helicase UPF1 to protect transcripts from nonsense-mediated mRNA decay

The sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins PTBP1 (polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1) and HNRNP L (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L) protect mRNAs from nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) by preventing the UPF1 RNA helicase from associating with potential decay targets. Here, by analyzing in vitro helicase activity, dissociation of UPF1 from purified mRNPs, and transcriptome-wide UPF1 RNA binding, we present the mechanistic basis for inhibition of NMD by PTBP1. Unlike mechanisms of RNA stabilization that depend on direct competition for binding sites among protective RNA-binding proteins and decay factors, PTBP1 promotes displacement of UPF1 already bound to potential substrates. Our results show that PTBP1 directly exploits the tendency of UPF1 to release RNA upon ATP binding and hydrolysis. We further find that UPF1 sensitivity to PTBP1 is coordinated by a regulatory loop in domain 1B of UPF1. We propose that the UPF1 regulatory loop and protective proteins control kinetic proofreading of potential NMD substrates, presenting a new model for RNA helicase regulation and target selection in the NMD pathway.

The L motifs of two moss pentatricopeptide repeat proteins are involved in RNA editing but predominantly not in RNA recognition.

Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, composed of PPR motifs repeated in tandem, are sequence-specific RNA binding proteins. Recent bioinformatic studies have shown that the combination of polar amino acids at positions 5 and last in each PPR motif recognizes RNA bases, and an RNA recognition code for PPR proteins has been proposed. Subsequent studies confirmed that the P (canonical length) and S (short) motifs bind to specific nucleotides according to this code. However, the contribution of L (long) motifs to RNA recognition is mostly controversial, owing to the presence of a nonpolar amino acid at position 5. The PLS-class PPR protein PpPPR_56 is a mitochondrial RNA editing factor in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Here, we performed in vitro RNA binding and in vivo complementation assays with PpPPR_56 and its variants containing mutated L motifs to investigate their contributions to RNA recognition. In vitro RNA binding assay showed that the original combination of amino acids at positions 5 and last in the L motifs of PpPPR_56 is not required for RNA recognition. In addition, an in vivo complementation assay with RNA editing factors PpPPR_56 and PpPPR_78 revealed the importance of nonpolar amino acids at position 5 of C-terminal L motifs for efficient RNA editing. Our findings suggest that L motifs function as non-binding spacers, not as RNA-binding motifs, to facilitate the formation of a complex between PLS-class PPR protein and RNA. As a result, the DYW domain, a putative catalytic deaminase responsible for C-to-U RNA editing, is correctly placed in proximity to C, which is to be edited.

Identification of new pentatricopeptide repeat proteins, MREF1 and 2, involved in mitochondrial RNA editing, using computational target RNA prediction.

C-to-U RNA editing has been widely observed in mitochondrial and plastid RNAs in plants. The editing sites are known to be recognized by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, which belong to one of the largest protein families in vascular plants. PPR proteins are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that participate in various steps of organelle RNA metabolism, such as cleavage, stabilization, splicing, translation, and editing. Elucidating the underlying mechanisms of sequence-specific RNA recognition by PPR proteins expanded our understanding of the role of PPR proteins in plant organellar RNA editing and enabled the computational prediction of target RNA-editing sites for PPR proteins of interest. Combining computational prediction and experimental verification, we identified three new PPR proteins involved in mitochondrial RNA editing: At1g56570, known as PGN for RNA editing of nad6_leader_-73 and cox2_742, At4g04370 for RNA editing of nad5_242, and At2g41080 for atp1_1292. Therefore, At4g04370 and At2g41080 were designated as mitochondrial RNA-editing factor 1 (MREF1) and MREF2, respectively. This study supports the use of computational prediction in establishing connections between PPR proteins and specific RNA-editing sites, which are important for maintaining various physiological processes, such as plant development, embryogenesis, and biotic- and abiotic-stress responses.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: The challenge of telling right from wrong in a complex transcriptome.

The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway selects and degrades its targets using a dense network of RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions. Together, these interactions allow the pathway to collect copious information about the translating mRNA, including translation termination status, splice junction positions, mRNP composition, and 3'UTR length and structure. The core NMD machinery, centered on the RNA helicase UPF1, integrates this information to determine the efficiency of decay. A picture of NMD is emerging in which many factors contribute to the dynamics of decay complex assembly and disassembly, thereby influencing the probability of decay. The ability of the NMD pathway to recognize mRNP features of diverse potential substrates allows it to simultaneously perform quality control and regulatory functions. In vertebrates, increased transcriptome complexity requires balance between these two functions since high NMD efficiency is desirable for maintenance of quality control fidelity but may impair expression of normal mRNAs. NMD has adapted to this challenge by employing mechanisms to enhance identification of certain potential substrates, while using sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins to shield others from detection. These elaborations on the conserved NMD mechanism permit more sensitive post-transcriptional gene regulation but can have severe deleterious consequences, including the failure to degrade pathogenic aberrant mRNAs in many B cell lymphomas. This article is categorized under: RNA Evolution and Genomics > RNA and Ribonucleoprotein Evolution RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Turnover/Surveillance Mechanisms.

Searching for a Match: Structure, Function and Application of Sequence-Specific RNA-Binding Proteins.

Plants encode over 1800 RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that modulate a myriad of steps in gene regulation from chromatin organization to translation, yet only a small number of these proteins and their target transcripts have been functionally characterized. Two classes of eukaryotic RBPs, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) and pumilio/fem-3 binding factors (PUF), recognize and bind to specific sequential RNA sequences through protein-RNA interactions. These modular proteins possess helical structural units containing key residues with high affinity for specific nucleotides, whose sequential order determines binding to a specific target RNA sequence. PPR proteins are nucleus-encoded, but largely regulate post-transcriptional gene regulation within plastids and mitochondria, including splicing, translation and RNA editing. Plant PUFs are involved in gene regulatory processes within the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. The modular structures of PPRs and PUFs that determine sequence specificity has facilitated identification of their RNA targets and biological functions. The protein-based RNA-targeting of PPRs and PUFs contrasts to the prokaryotic cluster regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated proteins (Cas) that target RNAs in prokaryotes. Together the PPR, PUF and CRISPR-Cas systems provide varied opportunities for RNA-targeted engineering applications.

Delineation of pentatricopeptide repeat codes for target RNA prediction.

Members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family are sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins that play crucial roles in organelle RNA metabolism. Each PPR protein consists of a tandem array of PPR motifs, each of which aligns to one nucleotide of the RNA target. The di-residues in the PPR motif, which are referred to as the PPR codes, determine nucleotide specificity. Numerous PPR codes are distributed among the vast number of PPR motifs, but the correlation between PPR codes and RNA bases is poorly understood, which hinders target RNA prediction and functional investigation of PPR proteins. To address this issue, we developed a modular assembly method for high-throughput construction of designer PPRs, and by using this method, 62 designer PPR proteins containing various PPR codes were assembled. Then, the correlation between these PPR codes and RNA bases was systematically explored and delineated. Based on this correlation, the web server PPRCODE (http://yinlab.hzau.edu.cn/pprcode) was developed. Our study will not only serve as a platform for facilitating target RNA prediction and functional investigation of the large number of PPR family proteins but also provide an alternative strategy for the assembly of custom PPRs that can potentially be used for plant organelle RNA manipulation.

Comprehensive Prediction of Target RNA Editing Sites for PLS-Class PPR Proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Hundreds of RNA editing events, that is conversion of cytidines (Cs) to uridines (Us), have been observed in the mitochondrial and plastid transcriptome in vascular plants. Defects of C-to-U RNA editing affect a wide variety of physiological processes. These editing sites are recognized by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily proteins. PPR proteins are sequence-specific RNA binding proteins that participate in multiple aspects of organellar RNA metabolism. They are categorized into P and PLS subclasses, where PLS-class proteins are largely identified as RNA editing PPRs. Elucidating the principle involved in PPR-RNA recognition, the so-called PPR code, has enhanced our understanding of the recognition of RNA editing sites, thereby enabling prediction of target RNA editing sites for uncharacterized PLS-class proteins. Computational PPR-RNA prediction in RNA editing can be applied to the study of PPR-deficient plants that are genetically isolated from physiological abnormalities. However, the use of PPR-RNA prediction in RNA editing is still restricted due to ambiguous procedures and prediction reliability. Here, we refined the PPR code dataset, and the reliability of the computational prediction was quantitatively evaluated using known RNA editing PPRs. With this knowledge, a computational analysis was conducted in the 'PPR-to-editing site' and 'editing site-to-PPR' directions, against 199 PLS-class proteins and 499 organelle RNA editing sites in Arabidopsis thaliana. We propose 52 plausible PPR-RNA pairs for uncharacterized proteins and editing sites. The presented data will facilitate the study of organellar RNA editing involved in diverse physiological processes in A. thaliana.

The central region of CNOT1 and CNOT9 stimulates deadenylation by the Ccr4-Not nuclease module.

Regulated degradation of cytoplasmic mRNA is important for the accurate execution of gene expression programmes in eukaryotic cells. A key step in this process is the shortening and removal of the mRNA poly(A) tail, which can be achieved by the recruitment of the multi-subunit Ccr4-Not nuclease complex via sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins or the microRNA machinery. The Ccr4-Not complex contains several modules that are attached to its large subunit CNOT1. Modules include the nuclease module, which associates with the MIF4G domain of CNOT1 and contains the catalytic subunits Caf1 and Ccr4, as well as the module containing the non-catalytic CNOT9 subunit, which binds to the DUF3819 domain of CNOT1. To understand the contributions of the individual modules to the activity of the complex, we have started to reconstitute sub-complexes of the human Ccr4-Not complex containing one or several functional modules. Here, we report the reconstitution of a pentameric complex including a BTG2-Caf1-Ccr4 nuclease module, CNOT9 and the central region of CNOT1 encompassing the MIF4G and DUF3819 domains. By comparing the biochemical activities of the pentameric complex and the nuclease module, we conclude that the CNOT1-CNOT9 components stimulate deadenylation by the nuclease module. In addition, we show that a pentameric complex containing the melanoma-associated CNOT9 P131L variant is able to support deadenylation similar to a complex containing the wild-type CNOT9 protein.

Characterization of cis-acting elements that control oscillating alternative splicing

ABSTRACTAlternative splicing (AS) in response to changing external conditions often requires alterations in the ability of sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins to bind to cis-acting sequences in their target pre-mRNA. While daily oscillations in AS events have been described in several organisms, cis-acting sequences that control time of the day-dependent AS remain largely elusive. Here we define cis-regulatory RNA elements that control body-temperature driven rhythmic AS using the mouse U2af26 gene as a model system. We identify a complex network of cis-regulatory sequences that regulate AS of U2af26, and show that the activity of two enhancer elements is necessary for oscillating AS. A minigene comprising these U2af26 regions recapitulates rhythmic splicing of the endogenous gene, which is controlled through temperature-regulated SR protein phosphorylation. Mutagenesis of the minigene delineates the cis-acting enhancer element for SRSF2 within exon 6 to single nucleotide resolution and reveals that the combined activity of SRSF2 and SRSF7 is required for oscillating U2af26 AS. By combining RNA-Seq with an siRNA screen and individual-nucleotide resolution cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (iCLIP), we identify a complex network of SR proteins that globally controls temperature-dependent rhythmic AS, with the direction of splicing depending on the position of the cis-acting elements. Together, we provide detailed insights into the sequence requirements that allow trans-acting factors to generate daily rhythms in AS.