Septal Extension Graft Research Articles

Achieving a Strong and Straight Septal Extension Graft: A Novel Four-step Surgical Approach in Rhinoplasty.

Septal extension grafts allow the precise elongation of the nasal septum to attain facial harmony and optimize aesthetic outcomes. In this context, septal surgery requires meticulous design to address both functional and aesthetic goals. Traditional septoplasty techniques often overlook aesthetic considerations and postoperative nasal structural stability, resulting in unresolved or recurrent deviations, nose tip drooping, and obstruction recurrences. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, achieving simultaneous septal alignment and long-term stability remains a significant challenge. This study introduces a systematic 4-step technique. The procedure encompasses caudal septum liberation, placement of the septum extension cartilage graft, positioning of an ethmoidal bone graft, and redefinition through an intermediate cartilage. A retrospective analysis of outcomes involving 753 patients was conducted with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. During follow-up visits, 1.73% of cases exhibited residual columellar asymmetry, and 0.66% showed tip asymmetries. The infection rate was 0.40%, with no cases of tip drop identified. The overall satisfaction rating on the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation questionnaire at 12 months postoperative was 9.3. The technique provides a systematic approach to integrate functional and aesthetic objectives, emphasizing septal stability and alignment while concurrently addressing tip projection and stability. The study provides comprehensive insights into the principles, methodology, and advantages of this rhinoplasty technique. The outcomes underscore the efficacy of the technique, presenting a reliable and long-term stable solution.

Letter to the Editor: Nasal Tip Flexibility and Stability: Comparison of Septal Extension Grafts and Columellar Strut Grafts in a Prospective Trial.

Letter to the Editor: Nasal Tip Flexibility and Stability: Comparison of Septal Extension Grafts and Columellar Strut Grafts in a Prospective Trial.

Application of Submucosal Trans-Septal Suturing Technique in a Septal Extension Graft With Porous High-Density Polyethylene and Concurrent Nasal Lateral Osteotomy.

Recently, a submucosal trans-septal suturing (STSS) technique was introduced to obviate the dead space of septum after septal extension graft (SEG) with porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE). To investigate STSS technique after SEG with pHDPE and concurrent nasal lateral osteotomy (LO). A retrospective study was conducted in 53 patients who underwent a STSS technique after SEG with pHDPE and concurrent LO. The postoperative discomfort (nasal pain and obstruction), the width of the nasal bony base, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE), and complications were recorded and assessed. The mean surgical duration of STSS was 862.53±227.73 seconds. The maximal mean score of postoperative nasal pain and nasal obstruction was 2.132±0.921 and 1.868±0.8995, respectively. The values on the width of the nasal bony base and ROE were significantly improved after surgery. There was no significant difference in NOSE values preoperatively versus 6 months postoperatively. An infection was found in 1 patient, a recurrent minor bleeding of septum in another patient, and a symptomatic nasal obstruction in other 2 patients. There was no major bleeding, hematoma, foreign body sensation, septal perforation, and other infection. STSS can eliminate the postoperative dead space of nasal septum with low discomfort and complications, and help to avoid a lateral displacement of osteotomized nasal bony segment (ONBS) in patients undergoing SEG with pHDPE and concurrent LO.

Flexible Nasal Tip Produced by Slender Septal Extension Graft.

Septal extension grafts (SEGs) can increase projection. However, it requires a large amount of graft and can result in a frozen tip. Thus, this study introduces a modified SEG, called a partial SEG. Partial SEGs minimize the amount of graft material requirement, avoid the occurrence of frozen tips, and increase nasal tip projection. This method is comparable to the fixed-mobile SEG (Rohrich et al. in Plast Reconstr Surg 149: 1350-1356, 2022) and anterior nasal septal angle (ANSA) banner (Neves and Tagle in Ann Plast Reconstr Surg 4(3): 1059, 2020); however, unlike those techniques, the tip is not sutured to the graft and the alar complex is not fixed, allowing free movement of the nasal tip within its anatomical limits. To further prevent long-term displacement or minimize loss of nasal tip projection, a method of fixing the graft with Prolene and a third end-to-end SEG method for preventing sliding between grafts were used, which was also effective. Among the patients who underwent surgery between September 2019 and September 2023, 238 were followed up for over 6 months. Most patients were satisfied with the natural and flexible nature of the nasal tip. In conclusion, the alar wrap around a slender SEG technique can be an option for who want a flexible nasal tip that is projected adequately rather than excessively.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Incisor Show Based Selection of Tip Augmentation Rhinoplasty Technique.

Our recent studies show that the majority of patients seeking rhinoplasty have inadequate incisor show. Furthermore, that some rhinoplasty maneuvers, such as a columella strut can alter the lip position and consequently the incisor show. We report the senior author's algorithm for tip augmentation technique based on our prior studies and 44 years of rhinoplasty keen observations. The five most common scenarios are described. When there is a short columella with inadequate incisor show, bilateral extended spreader grafts and columella strut with a tapered posterior portion are recommended, serving as a reliable midline septal extension graft supporting the medial crura in a more anterior position with sutures and a positive effect on incisor show. When there is optimal lip/incisor relationship, a columella strut with a tapered posterior end fixed to the septum, with or without extended spreader grafts is a better choice to prevent a change in smile. If there is excessive gum show, the optimal tip augmentation technique is a columella strut without tapering or even wider posterior end, with fixation of the columella strut to the septum, with or without extended spreader grafts which will push the upper lip caudally. The remaining scenarios are described in detail. Tip augmentation maneuvers in rhinoplasty can have a significant influence on upper lip position, which is often detrimental to the smile. The pre-operative position of the upper lip during smile should play an integral role in the selection of tip augmentation technique.

Impact of Tongue-in-Groove Technique on Smile and Lip Position: A Comparative Analysis with and without Septal Extension Graft.

This study was conducted to compare the outcomes of the tongue-in-groove (TIG) technique with and without septal extension graft (SEG) on smile and lip position in rhinoplasty. Fifty-eight rhinoplasty patients, treated at a tertiary referral center between 2020 and 2022, underwent preoperative and 12-month postoperative evaluations, using the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) and the visual analog scale (VAS). The preoperative and 12-month postoperative photographs were analyzed using Adobe Photoshop to assess changes in lip and smile positions. The study included 38 patients in the TIG with SEG group and 20 patients in the TIG without SEG group. The participants, with an average age of 32.12 ± 7.97 years, comprised 81% females. In terms of surgical outcomes, postoperative evaluations revealed significant improvements in the VAS aesthetic score, SCHNOS-O score, and SCHNOS-C score compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.001) for both groups. Notably, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in the upper lip length, nasolabial angle (NLA), columellar inclination (CI) angle, and smile NLA. Patients in the SEG group exhibited markedly superior SCHNOS-O results, as well as distinctions in smile NLA and smile CI, compared with the group without SEG. The impact of rhinoplasty techniques on lip and smile remains complex requiring further evaluation. Both of the TIG techniques, with and without SEG, resulted in positive outcomes in terms of improving lip and smile positions, with the use of SEG demonstrating greater stability during a smile.

Effect of Medical Ozone Therapy in Preventing Compromised Nasal Skin in Revision Rhinoplasty.

Ozone is often used as an additive therapy for skin conditions like infectious diseases, wound healing, diabetic foot, and pressure ulcers. The viability of the nasal skin has crucial importance in revision rhinoplasty cases. The study investigates the potential benefits of medical ozone therapy in healing the nasal skin in multiple-operated cases. The study retrospectively examined 523 revision rhinoplasty patients operated by the first author from January 2017 to January 2024. Patients consenting to ozone therapy received 3 major autohemotherapy sessions post-surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with compromised nasal skin (infection, poor vascular supply) and those with normal healing. Age, gender, smoking, diabetes, previous surgeries, grafting materials, and techniques were considered. Of the 523 patients, 12 (2.3%) experienced major skin complications like infection and necrosis, while 511 (97.7%) had no or minor issues, such as discoloration. In total, 301 patients accepted and received ozone therapy. Of the patients without major complications, 299 (58.3%) received ozone therapy, while 212 (41.7%) did not. Among the 12 with major complications, two (16.7%) received ozone therapy, and the remaining 10 (83.3%) did not. Ozone therapy recipients showed statistically fewer skin problems (p<0.05). Costal cartilage as tip and septal extension graft was linked to skin issues (p<0.05). No major adverse effects from ozone therapy were noted. Our findings indicate that ozone therapy may be a safe and potentially effective option for patients undergoing revision rhinoplasty, especially those with compromised nasal skin. It appears to aid in skin healing and regeneration, possibly through enhancing oxygen delivery and modulation of the immune response. Ozone therapy is a promising adjunct treatment for managing skin complications in revision rhinoplasty patients. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Tip Surgery in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: The Effect of Modified Low Septal Strip Septoplasty on Tip Plasty.

The aim in tip surgery is to provide rotation, derotation, projection and deprojection. In this study, we aimed to show the effects of modified low septal strip septoplasty, septal extension graft, TIG technique and additional maneuvers on tip shape in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) and to discuss our clinical results. One hundred eighty-nine patients who underwent DPR with modified low septal strip septoplasty between November 2021 and August 2023 were included in the study. Demographic data, complications, revision surgeries and follow-up periods of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean age of the patients is 29.58±9.04 (17-65). The mean follow-up period was 14, 50±2,98 months. Complications were observed in 1.1% of the patients (n=2/189). Revision surgery was performed in all these patients. Residual hump in 2 were observed and dorsum rasping was performed under local anesthesia. No tip revision was performed on any patient. A strong tip fixation is achieved with the modified low septal septoplasty technique described in this publication, and when combined with septal extension graft, tongue in groove technique and other suture techniques, an effective and permanent tip plasty can be performed in DPR. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Rhinoplasty Exclusively Utilizing Autologous Costal Cartilage for Patients with Prior Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

Rhinoplasty in patients with previous unilateral cleft lip repair is a surgical challenge due to complex nasal deformities, including a horizontally positioned nasal wing, wide cleft side nostrils, nasal base defects, and a short and deviated nasal columella. To comprehensively address these complexities, we exclusively utilized autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty procedures, using various surgical techniques. This study presents a comprehensive case series of 39 patients who had previously undergone unilateral cleft lip surgery but still had nasal deformities. Rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage was performed at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam. Costal cartilage was partially crushed and then finely cut to shape the dorsal area and raise the nasal base on the cleft side. Partially crushed cartilage was also used to shape shield grafts, cap grafts, and alar batten grafts, whereas sliced cartilage was utilized for septal extension grafts. Evaluation was based on improvements in anthropometric indicators, patient satisfaction using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale and FACE-Q scores. The average age of patients was 25.13 years. All postoperative anthropometric indicators showed significant improvements. Postsurgery, the total ROE score was three times higher than before surgery (P < 0.001), and the total FACE-Q score was 2.26 times higher (P < 0.001). No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. This procedure effectively addresses complex nasal deformities in patients with prior unilateral cleft lip repair, emphasizing the value of autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty for such individuals.

Double Reinforcing Strategy with Perpendicular Plate of Ethmoid in Asian Secondary Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

Deviation and asymmetry relapse after secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty with septal extension graft is a common yet serious problem especially among Asian patients. Therefore, finding an effective approach to reduce deformity relapse remains a great challenge to plastic surgeons. In this study, authors established finite element models to simulate different nasal cartilage-corrected options and different reinforcing strategies in secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty. A load of 0.01N was given to the nasal tip to simulate the soft tissue pressure, while two loads of 0.5N were separately given to the anterior and posterior part of the septal extension graft to simulate the rhinoplasty condition. Maximum deformations were evaluated to make stability judgments. The maximum deformation of different cartilage correction models in ascending order was: UCL deformity with septum correction, normal nasal cartilage, UCL nasal deformity, and UCL nasal deformity with lower lateral cartilage correction. When applied L-strut reinforcement graft was harvested from the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone, the maximum deformation of the models decreased significantly, and strong fixation of the septum could further enhance this decreasing effect. Correcting the septum and lower lateral cartilage together could improve the structural stability and symmetry in secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty. To keep the corrected septum stable and thus reduce deformity relapse, reinforcing the L-strut with perpendicular plate of ethmoid graft while strongly anchoring the septal cartilage to the anterior nasal spine was proved to be effective in both finite element analysis and clinical observation. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Submucosal Trans-Septal Suturing Technique After a Septal Extension Graft with Porous High-Density Polyethylene: A Technical Report.

Porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE) is an alternative material for a septal extension graft (SEG) in oriental rhinoplasty when autologous cartilage is limited. Although nasal packing (NP) and trans-septal suturing (TSS) techniques are routine procedures to obviate the dead space after septoplasty, they are associated with certain discomforts and complications. To investigate the application of a submucosal trans-septal suturing (STSS) technique after SEG with pHDPE. A prospective study was conducted on 60 female participants who underwent SEG with pHDPE. The participants were randomly divided into the NP group and STSS group. The extra surgical duration of NP and STSS, pain, nasal obstruction, and sleeping disturbance as well as postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups. No significant difference was found between group NP and group STSS in terms of mean age. The mean extra surgical duration of group STSS was significantly longer than group NP. There were significant higher pains of group NP at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively, compared with group STSS. The NP group also experienced significantly more nasal obstruction and sleep disturbance within 48h postoperatively compared to the STSS group. There was one infection in each group, minor bleeding in two NP patients, and one STSS patient. There was no major bleeding, hematoma, graft exposure, or septal perforation in both groups. Although STSS needs a longer extra surgical duration than NP, it significantly improves the patient's postoperative comfort with a faster return to normal respiration compared to NP. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indications, Stability, and Surgical Outcomes of Using Osteochondral Nasal Septal Graft as a Septal Extension Graft in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Septal extension graft (SEG) is an adaptable tool that controls, supports, and stabilizes the nasal tip projection, rotation, length, and shape. Recent studies comparing SEGs to more conventional columellar strut grafts found that SEGs provided improved results. This prospective cohort study included 66 patients divided into 2 groups based on their indications. Group 1 was patients who underwent septorhinoplasty using osteochondral septal extension graft (OSEG), and group 2 underwent septorhinoplasty using cartilaginous SEG. The main reason for undergoing OSEG was insufficient septal cartilage (P<0.001). The outcomes were not significantly different between both groups, with the % of patients who experienced positive outcomes ranging from 78.8% to 97%. The OSEG is a safe, valid, and effective option in septorhinoplasty that can be used in patients with insufficient cartilaginous septum.

Use of Auricular Composite graft in Rib-Cartilage based Rhinoplasty for Contracted Nose Correction.

This study investigated the effects of combining an auricular composite graft with rib cartilage-based rhinoplasty to correct contracted noses in Asian patients with a history of multiple previous operations. A total of 43 patients were included in the retrospective analysis of secondary rhinoplasty procedures. The surgical approach involved short-nose correction, utilizing rib cartilage for septal extension grafts and chondrocutaneous composite grafts harvested from the conchal part of the ear for internal nasal lining reconstruction. Our assessment encompassed clinical outcomes, the occurrence of complications, and the utilization of three-dimensional (3D) photography for nasal measurements at the preoperative, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative stages. Regarding graft survival, 12 (27.9%) patients showed >80% graft engraftment, followed by 29 (67.4%) patients with 50%-80% graft engraftment, and 2 (4.6%) patients with 20%-50% graft engraftment. Two of these patients required wound irrigation for infection control and additional repair and were finally discharged without significant nasal deformity. At 3 months postoperatively, 3D anthropometry showed significant differences in nasal dorsum length (4.46 ± 1.79 mm), nasal height (1.25 ± 1.25 mm), nasal tip projection (4.06 ± 1.76 mm), and columellar-labial angle (22.75° ± 14.19°). No significant relapse of nasal parameters was noted 1 year postoperatively. Auricular composite graft combined with rib cartilage-based rhinoplasty enables the comprehensive restoration of nasal structures, addressing the inner, intermediate, and outer layers. This approach can serve as an effective and sustainable option for correcting contracted noses in Asian patients who have undergone multiple operations.

Functional evaluation of Septal L-strut extension graft in East Asians

BackgroundThe septal L-strut extension graft (SLEG) consists of anterior extended spreader graft and caudal septal extension graft. SLEG is used to increase the anterocaudal projection from a low-profile nose by creating the de-novo septum. This retrospective study verified the effectiveness of SLEG in improving the nasal function in East Asians. MaterialsMedical records of patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with SLEG were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical features showed under-projected lower two-thirds of the nose with septal deviation, saddle nose, and short nose. We analyzed the post-operative changes in the NOSE score and variables of nasal geometry measured using acoustic rhinometry through long-term follow-up. ResultsPatients were divided into two groups, those who underwent SLEG with turbinoplasty (Group A) and SLEG alone (group B). The NOSE scores decreased significantly in groups A and B, and the improvement was statistically more significant in Group A (p < 0.05). Acoustic rhinometry showed an increase in nasal cavity volume (VOL1) on the deviated side in Group A, and an increase in minimal cross-sectional area 1 (MCA1) on the deviated side in Group B (p < 0.05). The non-deviated side did not show significant reduction in MCA1 and VOL1 after SLEG with or without turbinoplasty. Thus, SLEG, by itself, improved airway function in East Asians. ConclusionsSLEG has proven to be valuable in improving nasal function.

Correcting Different Degrees of Droopy Nose, an Overview of Techniques and Strategies at Tertiary Facial Plastic Center. A Retrospective Analysis.

The variety of noses in the mixed Saudi population keeps rhinoplasty surgeons on their toes. The main treatment goal for drooping nose tips is the first rotation of the nasal tip superiorly. Although droopy nose is a common disease in Saudi Arabia, none of the previous studies recognized the general features of droopy nose. A retrospective analysis of 352 patients with nasal drooping nose from 2016 to 2022. The main outcome measurements were general characteristics of nasal tip ptosis, and the most common surgical techniques used to treat nasal tip ptosis in a tertiary hospital. Analysis of 352 patients with droopy nose showed that 29.0% were between 25 and 29 years old, and 56.3% were female patients. The most common characteristic seen with droopy nasal tip was a significant dorsal hump in 64.8% of patients, followed by amorphous, boxy, and bulbous nasal tip in 33.5%. Significant dorsal hump and bifid tip were more common between 18 and 24. Meanwhile, amorphous, boxy, and bulbous nasal tip were more common in female individuals. The surgical techniques mostly addressed the underlying cause, which was tip grafting (83.0%), lateral osteotomy (77.3%), hump removal (66.5%), lateral crura method (61.9%), and septal extension graft (40.9%). The research concluded that the surgeon should be familiar with the patient's underlying cause of nasal tip ptosis and use surgical techniques accordingly. To get a pleased long-term outcome, it is often essential to repair the inferiorly rotated tip using more than one surgical approach.

Analysis of the Effectiveness of Anterior Septal Reconstruction in Asians.

Background: Although anterior septal reconstruction (ASR) is effective, it is less commonly employed in Asian patients compared with the septal extension graft technique, even in cases of severe antero-caudal septal deviation. Objective: To compare airflow and patient perceptions after ASR in patients of Korean descent with caudal septal deviations and external nasal deformities, we considered the potential tendency of their septal cartilage to be smaller and less robust compared with that of Caucasians. The measurements were conducted using acoustic rhinometry and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 103 patients using preoperative and 3-month postoperative assessments: Korean version of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (K-SCHNOS), obstructive (SCHNOS-O), and cosmetic (SCHNOS-C) scores, and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) measured by acoustic rhinometry. Results: Among 103 patients (mean age 33.36 years, median age 32 years, age range 17-70 years, 77 men [75%], and 26 women [25%]), the average follow-up period for the patients was 264.6 days (median 202 days and range 13-1540 days), SCHNOS-O scores improved significantly from 64.02 ± 4.89 to 19.31 ± 4.45 after ASR (p < 0.001), as did SCHNOS-C scores, improving from 60.61 ± 7.71 to 14.25 ± 4.66 (p < 0.001). MCA increased from 0.30 ± 0.16 cm2 to 0.56 ± 0.38 cm2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: As measured by MCA and SCHNOS scores at 3 months postoperatively, ASR proves valuable for correcting antero-caudal septal deviations and nasal deformities in Asians, despite the tendency of their septal cartilage to be smaller and less strong compared with that of Caucasians.

Superiority of the Septal Extension Graft Technique in Rhinoplasty Patient Satisfaction Versus the Intercrural Strut

Background: Considering that rhinoplasty is one of the most demanded surgeries nowadays, it is necessary to analyse the relationship between the final result and the satisfaction of the patients who have undergone surgery. The objective of this study was to measure patient satisfaction by comparing the results achieved 6 months after their surgery following the use of two surgical techniques: the intercrural strut type technique, in contrast to the septal extension graft technique. Methods: Ambispective analytical cohort study in two parallel groups with patients scheduled for rhinoplasty. Sample size was calculated with a confidence level of 95% and a power of 80%, resulting in a minimum of 20 subjects to be included. Fifty-three patients participated: 22 operated with the i ntercrural strut technique and 31 with septal extension grafting. Results: An increase in the nasolabial angle was identified, with similar results between techniques. At 6-month evaluation, a decrease in the nasolabial angle was observed in all patients. Conclusion: The nasolabial angle remained higher at 6 months in the septal extension group compared to the intercrural post group; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Notably, the patient satisfaction survey revealed that only 59.1% of individuals who underwent surgery with the intercrural strut technique expressed satisfaction with the results. Conversely, 100% of the subjects who underwent surgery using the septal extension graft technique reported being satisfied with the final outcome.

New Concept for Articulated Alar Rim Graft Positioning.

The articulated alar rim graft (AARG) proposed by Davis is a simple and effective method for avoiding and correcting most alar rim deformities in rhinoplasty. In addition to its benefit for the nasal ala, the position suggested herein allows for a precise definition of the facet polygon and infratip lobule. A retrospective series of 317 patients surgically treated with the modified AARG positioning were evaluated. The height of the septal extension graft was always a few millimeters above the new dome, without demanding excessive lateral crural tensioning (LCT), and the AARG itself was fixed more on the facet polygon and infratip than in the standard procedure. The results were favorable after 1 year of follow-up. The proposed AARG modification yielded good nasal tip projection and definition without excess LCT, enhanced the facet polygon and supra-alar sulcus, and stretched the skin downward. Functional gain was reported by most patients. Few minor and common complications were reported. The use of this modified AARG position can avoid and correct most alar deformities, with the added benefit of providing better control over tip definition without the need for excessive LCT or overprojection of the nose.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Including Nasal Breathing Improvement After Functional Rhinoplasty Using Endonasal Septal Extension Grafting.

Objective: To measure the change perceived by patients after endonasal rhinoplasty using a, septal extension graft (SEG), as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A retrospective review of patients with nasal obstruction underwent septoplasty, turbinoplasty, and SEG. PROMs were assessed to compare operative outcomes for breathing (Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation [NOSE], Sinonasal Outcome Test [SNOT]-22, Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey [SCHNOS]), and sleep quality (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) Results: Of the 34 patients undergoing rhinoplasty with Endonasal SEG, the median patient age was 38.3 years (range 17-58) and mostly male (n = 18, 52.9%). Additional procedures performed on the patients included septoplasty (n = 34, 100%) and turbinate reduction (n = 34, 100%). Average follow-up was 126.6 days (range 28-573) for a majority of PROMs. There were no complications. The average change in NOSE score was 71.5 and -49.4 (standard deviation [SD] = 19.0, p < 0.001). SNOT-22 change was 35.4 and -24.2 (SD = 14.5, p < 0.001), and ESS scores averaged 6.7 and -3.4 (SD = 4.3, p < 0.001). The average SCHNOS total, functional, and cosmetic scores were 40.6, 67.9, and 22.4, respectively, and -28.0 (SD = 19.8), -44.5 (SD = 22.9), and 17.1 (SD = 24.6) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this pilot study, patients reported improvement in nasal breathing after correcting a deviated caudal septum and applying an Endonasal SEG.

Secondary Bilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty: Achieving an Aesthetic Result.

Secondary rhinoplasty in patients with bilateral cleft lip poses ongoing challenges and requires a reliable method for achieving optimal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to establish a safe and effective method for secondary bilateral cleft rhinoplasty. A consecutive series of 92 skeletally matured patients with bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity were included. All had undergone secondary open rhinoplasty, performed by a single surgeon with a bilateral reverse-U flap and septal extension graft, between 2013 and 2021. Medical records of these 92 patients were reviewed to assess the clinical course. A 3-dimensional (3D) anthropometric analysis and panel assessment of 32 patients were performed to evaluate the aesthetic improvement, with an age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched normal control group for comparisons. The methods showed statistically significant improvement in addressing a short columella (columellar height), short nasal bridge (nasal bridge length), de-projected nasal tip (nasal tip projection, nasal dorsum angle), poorly defined nasal tip (nasal tip angle, dome height, and panel assessment), and transversely oriented nostrils (columellar height, alar width, nostril type). Importantly, these improvements were accompanied by a low complication rate of 4%. However, upper lip deficiency over the upper lip angle and labial-columellar angle remained without significant improvement. In this study we described effective secondary rhinoplasty, which was composed of a bilateral reverse-U flap and septal extension graft, with acceptable outcome. The 3D anthropometric analysis and panel assessment clarified that our rhinoplasty procedure could bring the nasal morphology in these patients closer to the normal data.