Sentinel Node Tumor Burden Research Articles

1076O Primary analysis of the EORTC 1208 Minitub trial: Prospective registry of sentinel node (SN) positive melanoma patients with minimal SN tumor burden

1076O Primary analysis of the EORTC 1208 Minitub trial: Prospective registry of sentinel node (SN) positive melanoma patients with minimal SN tumor burden

Sentinel lymph node assessment in melanoma: current state and future directions.

Assessment of sentinel lymph node status is an important step in the evaluation of patients with melanoma for both prognosis and therapeutic management. Pathologists have an important role in this evaluation. The methodologies have varied over time, from the evaluation of dimensions of metastatic burden to determination of the location of the tumour deposits within the lymph node to precise cell counting. However, no single method of sentinel lymph node tumour burden measurement can currently be used as a sole independent predictor of prognosis. The management approach to sentinel lymph node-positive patients has also evolved over time, with a more conservative approach recently recognised for selected cases. This review gives an overview of past and current status in the field with a glimpse into future directions based on prior experiences and clinical trials.

Checkpoint blockade and BRAF/MEK therapy in the therapeutic setting improved the overall survival after sentinel node biopsy: A retrospective study comparing patients with primary care between 1998-2009 and 2010-2017.

Immunotherapies using checkpoint blockade and BRAF/MEK therapies have improved overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable melanoma metastases. In this retrospective study, we aimed to demonstrate the resulting increase in melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and OS after the excision of primary melanomas (≥1 mm thick) and sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox models, we compared two consecutive cohorts. Patients in cohort 1 (N=518) underwent SNB between 1998 and 2009, and patients in cohort 2 (N=460) between 2010 and 2017, when checkpoint blockade and BRAF/(MEK) inhibition became available for the treatment of unresectable relapses. The median follow-up times were 120 and 73 months, respectively. While recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival rates remained very similar, MSS and OS increased in favor of cohort 2. The estimated 5-year OS rate of SN-positive patients increased by 14.3% (78.5% vs 64.2%, logrank test: P=.005). The MSS benefit was significant even with low SN tumor burden (metastasis diameter < 1 mm). On multivariate analyses, the risk-reduction in favor of cohort 2 was significant in the total population and in the SN-negative and SN-positive subgroups. In SN-positive patients, besides the availability of modern therapies, SN metastasis diameter and ulceration were independent factors of MSS and OS. Treatment of unresectable melanoma recurrences with modern drug therapies results in significantly higher survival rates in a population with SNB. The survival benefit measured from primary melanoma affects both the SN-positive and SN-negative subpopulations.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in extramammary Paget disease: A 13-year institutional experience.

Whether sentinel lymph node biopsy status is a prognostic factor or effective in determining treatment strategies in extramammary Paget disease remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in extramammary Paget disease. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information of previously untreated patients with invasive extramammary Paget disease who underwent wide local excision of the primary tumor and sentinel lymph node biopsy at our hospital between April 2008 and March 2021. Clinical data including the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and recurrence-free survival were analyzed. Sentinel lymph node metastases were classified as macrometastases and micrometastases, with a cut-off value for sentinel lymph node tumor burden of 2 mm. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors affecting sentinel lymph node biopsy positivity and recurrence-free survival rates were performed. Overall, 85 patients were included in the analysis. Patients in the sentinel lymph node biopsy-positive group (n=26) had a significantly higher invasion level and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. According to multivariate analyses, invasion level and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent predictive factors for sentinel lymph node biopsy positivity, and the sentinel lymph node biopsy status was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival. In conclusion, sentinel lymph node biopsy provides an accurate risk classification and clinical indication for postoperative follow-up in patients with invasive extramammary Paget disease.

The role of sentinel node tumor burden in modeling the prognosis of melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy: an Italian melanoma intergroup study (N = 2,086)

BackgroundThe management of melanoma patients with metastatic melanoma in the sentinel nodes (SN) is evolving based on the results of trials questioning the impact of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and demonstrating the efficacy of new adjuvant treatments. In this landscape, new prognostic tools for fine risk stratification are eagerly sought to optimize the therapeutic path of these patients.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 2,086 patients treated with CLND after a positive SN biopsy in thirteen Italian Melanoma Centers was reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was the outcome of interest; included independent variables were the following: age, gender, primary melanoma site, Breslow thickness, ulceration, sentinel node tumor burden (SNTB), number of positive SN, non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSN) status. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.ResultsThe 3-year, 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 79%, 70% and 54%, respectively. At univariate analysis, all variables, except for primary melanoma body site, were found to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that older age (P < 0.0001), male gender (P = 0.04), increasing Breslow thickness (P < 0.0001), presence of ulceration (P = 0.004), SNTB size (P < 0.0001) and metastatic NSN (P < 0.0001) were independent negative predictors of OS.ConclusionThe above results were utilized to build a nomogram in order to ease the practical implementation of our prognostic model, which might improve treatment personalization.

Outcomes in patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma treated with adjuvant nivolumab or monitored with observation: A real-world study.

e21534 Background: Nivolumab is approved in the United States and other countries as an adjuvant treatment for patients with completely resected stage III–IV melanoma based on results of the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial, though the trial enrolled a limited number of patients with stage IIIA disease (AJCC-8). The objective of this real-world study is to describe characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC-8) treated with adjuvant nivolumab or monitored with observation. Methods: In this retrospective, chart-review study, physicians from Cardinal Health’s proprietary Oncology Provider Extended Network (OPEN) extracted data from electronic health records of patients who had undergone complete surgical resection of stage IIIA melanoma between Jan. 1, 2018, and Dec. 31, 2019. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated from the date of resection and compared between the adjuvant nivolumab and observation cohorts using log-rank tests and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models (covariates included age, sex, race, region, payer type, ECOG PS, and Charlson Comorbidity Index). Discontinuations and deaths due to adjuvant nivolumab toxicity were assessed. Results: This study included 171 patients treated with adjuvant nivolumab and 38 patients monitored with observation. In the adjuvant nivolumab and observation cohorts, respectively, mean age was 57.4 and 68.1 years; most patients were male (59% and 68%) and white (90% and 87%); and median follow-up from resection was 20.7 and 25.0 months. Sentinel lymph node tumor burden of &lt; 1 mm was reported in 12% (n = 20) and 16% (n = 6) of patients in the adjuvant nivolumab and observation cohorts, respectively. The scheduled treatment course with adjuvant nivolumab was completed by 91% of patients (n = 155). RFS and OS rates were numerically higher with adjuvant nivolumab than with observation (Table). There was a trend toward RFS and OS benefit with adjuvant nivolumab versus observation (unadjusted RFS HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26–1.09; adjusted RFS HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.28–1.40; unadjusted OS HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19–1.57; adjusted OS HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.25–2.61). Discontinuation of adjuvant nivolumab due to toxicity occurred in 2% of patients (n = 4); no treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: These real-world results confirm that patients with resected stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC-8) have a good prognosis. Treatment with adjuvant nivolumab may provide modest survival benefit over observation in this population, though increased sample size and additional follow-up are warranted.[Table: see text]

A prediction model for early systemic recurrence in breast cancer using a molecular diagnostic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes: A large-scale, multicenter cohort study.

BackgroundThe one‐step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay can quantify the cytokeratin 19 messenger RNA copy number as a proxy for sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis in breast cancer. A large‐scale, multicenter cohort study was performed to determine the prognostic value of the SN tumor burden based on a molecular readout and to establish a model for the prediction of early systemic recurrence in patients using the OSNA assay.MethodsSN biopsies from 4757 patients with breast cancer were analyzed with the OSNA assay. The patients were randomly assigned to the training or validation cohort at a ratio of 2:1. On the basis of the training cohort, the threshold SN tumor burden value for stratifying distant recurrence was determined with Youden's index; predictors of distant recurrence were investigated via multivariable analyses. Based on the selected predictors, a model for estimating 5‐year distant recurrence–free survival was constructed, and predictive performance was measured with the validation cohort.ResultsThe prognostic cutoff value for the SN tumor burden was 1100 copies/μL. The following variables were significantly associated with distant recurrence and were used to construct the prediction model: SN tumor burden, age, pT classification, grade, progesterone receptor, adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy, and adjuvant anti–human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy. The values for the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 0.83, 63.4%, 81.7%, and 81.1%, respectively.ConclusionsUsing the OSNA assay, the molecular readout–based SN tumor burden is an independent prognostic factor for early breast cancer. This model accurately predicts early systemic recurrence and may facilitate decision‐making related to treatment.

Sentinel lymph node melanoma metastases: Assessment of tumor burden for clinical prediction of outcome in the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I)

PurposeAs clinical management decisions in patients with Stage III melanoma have become more complex, precise pathologic characterization of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases has become critical to guide management. The extent of SLN involvement correlates with risk of adverse outcomes, but reported methods of disease quantification vary. We examined SLN metastases from patients participating in an international clinical trial and compared several methods of tumor burden quantification. MethodsSLNs from 146 node-positive patients in the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) were centrally-reviewed and characterized by number of tumor-positive nodes, percent nodal area tumor replacement, maximum dimension of largest metastasis, tumor penetrative depth, number of tumor foci, metastasis microanatomic location, and extracapsular extension. These data were analyzed for correlation with non-SLN metastasis and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). ResultsThe median number of tumor-involved SLNs was 1. The median maximum metastasis dimension was 1.11 mm. Median SLN area involvement was 1.5%. Tumor burden measures were highly correlated with each other. Factors associated with non-SLN metastasis by univariable analysis were primary tumor ulceration and extent of metastases. Tumor thickness, ulceration, non-SLN metastasis and multiple measures of SLN tumor burden were significantly related to MSS on univariable analysis. After multivariable adjustment, number of involved SLNs (p = 0.05) and percent nodal area tumor replacement (p = 0.02) were independent predictors of MSS. ConclusionCentral review of MSLT-I pathology indicates that primary tumor and SLN tumor characteristics predict non-SLN metastasis and MSS. Percent nodal involvement was more powerfully prognostic than the more commonly used maximum dimension of largest metastasis.

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) immunoreactivity in positive sentinel nodes from patients with melanoma

ObjectivePatients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel node (SN) are currently eligible for adjuvant treatment with targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging could be an alternative and less invasive tool for SN biopsy to select patients for adjuvant treatment. One potential target for NIR is the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET). This study aimed to assess MET immunoreactivity in positive SNs and to evaluate its potential diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value. MethodsIn this retrospective study, positive SN samples from patients with primary cutaneous melanoma were collected to assess MET immunoreactivity. To this end, paraffin-embedded SNs were stained for MET (monoclonal antibody D1C2). A 4-point Histoscore was used to determine cytoplasmic and membranous immunoreactivity (0 negative/1 weak/2 moderate/3 strong). Samples were considered positive when ≥10% of the cancer cells showed MET expression (staining intensity ≥1). Patient and clinicopathological characteristics were used for descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression, and survival analyses. ResultsPositive MET immunohistochemistry was observed in 24 out of 37 samples (65%). No statistically significant associations were found between MET positivity and the following prognostic factors: Breslow thickness (P = 0.961), ulceration (P = 1.000), and SN tumor burden (P = 0.792). According to MET positivity, Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant differences in survival. ConclusionThis exploratory study found no evidence to support MET immunoreactivity in positive SNs as a possible diagnostic or prognostic indicator in patients with melanoma.

Correction to: Sentinel node tumor burden in cutaneous melanoma. Survival with competing risk analysis and influence in relapses and non‑sentinel node status: retrospective cohort study with long follow‑up in a Spanish population

Correction to: Sentinel node tumor burden in cutaneous melanoma. Survival with competing risk analysis and influence in relapses and non‑sentinel node status: retrospective cohort study with long follow‑up in a Spanish population

Sentinel node tumor burden in cutaneous melanoma. Survival with competing risk analysis and influence in relapses and non-sentinel node status: retrospective cohort study with long follow-up in a Spanish population.

Several authors have studied the potential of sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumor burden as prognostic factor but the microscopic classifications used in different study groups were variable. We examined the prognostic role of tumor burden in SLN on melanoma specific-survival and competing causes of death. We also analysed clinical and histological factors as predictors of disease relapses and additional non sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases. We included all patients with cutaneous melanoma that underwent SLN biopsy between 2002 and 2012 at Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (Spain). The study end-points were death due to melanoma, melanoma relapse and involvement of NSLN. We used Fine-Gray test for competing risk analysis. A logistic regression model was performed to predict the risk of involvement of NSLN. Between 2002 and 2012, there were 348 patients who underwent SLN biopsy in our centre (308 were eligible for the study). 26.9% patients positive SLN. 88 patients died during the follow-up period and 66 (75%) died from melanoma. The 5-year cumulative incidence of melanoma death was 15.33% (95 % CI 15.25-15.42). The cumulative probability of death from melanoma was associated with gender, histological subtype, Breslow thickness, mitotic rate, ulceration and SLN tumor burden. In multivariable analysis, Breslow thickness and SLN tumor burden remained as independent prognostic factors. SLN tumor burden appears to be an important prognostic factor. It is very important reporting these characteristics in pathological reports. More prospective studies would be necessary to analyze these variables and to be able to make recommendations in management of melanoma patients.

High discordance rate in assessing sentinel node positivity in cutaneous melanoma: Expert review may reduce unjustified adjuvant treatment

IntroductionIdentification of sentinel node (SN) metastases can set the adjuvant systemic therapy indication for patients with stage III melanoma. Studies re-evaluating the diagnosis of initially positive SN biopsies are scarce. Materials and methodsDutch patients with melanoma who underwent SN biopsy between 2003 and 2014 were selected from PALGA, the Dutch Pathology Registry. Histopathological slides of SN-positive patients were retrieved for review. A random sample was reassessed by an expert melanoma pathologist. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients who were misclassified (false-positive) was compared with those with a true positive SN status. For comparison, a group of SN-negative patients was included. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed to assess clinicopathological characteristics associated with misclassification of SN status. ResultsDiagnosis was downgraded from melanoma metastasis to nodal nevus in 38 of the 322 reviewed patients (11.8%). Considering the inclusion criteria of phase III adjuvant trials, at least 4.3% of patients would have falsely qualified for adjuvant therapy. In multivariable analysis, patients with a low SN tumour burden and subcapsular SN tumour location had a significantly higher chance of being misclassified. The five-year RFS of the 38 downgraded patients was 86.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72.6–96.6), similar to the 85.9% (95% CI = 84.9–86.8, p = 0.18) for 6413 SN-negative patients and better than the 53.2% (95% CI = 47.2–59.9, p = 0.009) of 284 patients who were truly SN positive upon review. ConclusionMore than 10% of originally positive SN biopsies of patients with melanoma concern misclassified nodal nevi. We advocate that when adjuvant treatment is considered in patients with stage III melanoma, SN biopsies should be reassessed by an expert melanoma pathologist.

Completely resected stage III melanoma controversy - 15 years of national tertiary centre experience.

BackgroundTwo prospective randomized studies analysing cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and rapid development of systemic adjuvant therapy have changed our approach to stage III CM treatment. The aim of this study was to compare results of retrospective survival analysis of stage III CM patients’ treatment from Slovenian national CM register to leading international clinical guidelines.Patients and methodsSince 2000, all Slovenian CM patients with primary tumour ≥ TIb are treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and data are prospectively collected into a national CM registry. A retrospective analysis of 2426 sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies and 789 lymphadenectomies performed until 2015 was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests.ResultsPositive SLN was found in 519/2426 (21.4%) of patients and completion dissection (CLND) was performed in 455 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of CLND group was 58% vs. 47% of metachronous metastases group (MLNM) (p = 0.003). The 5-year OS of patients with lymph node (LN) metastases and unknown primary site (UPM) was 45% vs. 21% of patients with synchronous LN metastasis. Patients with SLN tumour burden < 0.3 mm had 5-year OS similar to SLN negative patients (86% vs. 85%; p = 0.926). The 5-year OS of patients with burden > 1.0 mm was similar to the MLNM group (49% vs. 47%; p = 0.280).ConclusionsStage III melanoma patients is a heterogeneous group with significant OS differences. CLND after positive SLNB might still remain a method of treatment for selected patients with stage III.

Management of the positive sentinel lymph node in the post-MSLT-II era.

The publication of MSLT-II shifted recommendations for management of sentinel lymph node biopsy positive (SLNB+) melanoma to favor active surveillance. We examined trends in immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following publication of MSLT-II. Using a prospective melanoma database at a high-volume center, we identified a cohort of consecutive SLNB+ patients from July 2016 to April 2019. Patient and disease characteristics were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to examine factors associated with CLND. Two hundred and thirty-five patients were included for analysis. CLND rates were 67%, 33%, and 26% for the year before, year after, and second-year following MSLT-II. Factors associated with undergoing CLND included primary located in the head and neck (59% vs 33%, P = .003 and odds ratio [OR], 5.22, P = .002) and higher sentinel node tumor burden (43% vs 10% for tumor burden ≥0.1 mm, P < .001 and OR, 8.64, P = .002). Rates of CLND in SLNB+ melanoma decreased dramatically, albeit not uniformly, following MSLT-II. Factors that increased the likelihood of immediate CLND were primary tumor located in the head and neck and high sentinel node tumor burden. These groups were underrepresented in MSLT-II, suggesting that clinicians are wary of implementing active surveillance recommendations for patients perceived as higher risk.

The EORTC-DeCOG nomogram adequately predicts outcomes of patients with sentinel node–positive melanoma without the need for completion lymph node dissection

PurposeBased on recent advances in the management of patients with sentinel node (SN)–positive melanoma, we aimed to develop prediction models for recurrence, distant metastasis (DM) and overall mortality (OM). MethodsThe derivation cohort consisted of 1080 patients with SN-positive melanoma from nine European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) centres. Prognostic factors for recurrence, DM and OM were studied with Cox regression analysis. Significant factors were incorporated in the models. Performance was assessed by discrimination (c-index) and calibration in cross-validation across centres. The models were externally validated using a prospective cohort consisting of 705 German patients with SN-positive: 473 trial participants of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group study (DeCOG-SLT) and 232 screened patients. A nomogram was developed for graphical presentation. ResultsThe final model for recurrence and the calibrated models for DM and OM included ulceration, age, SN tumour burden and Breslow thickness. The models showed reasonable calibration. The c-index for the recurrence, DM and OM model was 0.68, 0.70 and 0.70, respectively, and 0.70, 0.72 and 0.74, respectively, in external validation. The EORTC-DeCOG model identified a robust low-risk group, with all identified low-risk patients (approximately 4% of the entire population) having a 5-year recurrence probability of <25% and an overall 5-year recurrence rate of 13%. A model including information on completion lymph node dissection (CLND) showed only marginal improvement in model performance. ConclusionsThe EORTC-DeCOG nomogram provides an adequate prognostic tool for patients with SN-positive melanoma, without the need for CLND. It showed consistent results across validation. The nomogram could be used for patient counselling and might aid in adjuvant therapy decision-making.

Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients

Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in staging systems and risk models by guiding high-risk patients’ adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. In this retrospective study of university hospital melanoma database we analyzed tumor burden and prognosis in patients with positive SNs. Patients were stratified by the diameter of tumor deposit, distribution of metastatic focus in SN, ulceration and number of metastatic SNs. These were incorporated in Cox proportional hazard regression models. Predictive ability was assessed using Akaike information criterion and Harrell’s concordance index. A total of 110 patients had positive SN and 104 underwent CLND. Twenty-two (21%) patients had non-SN metastatic disease on CLND. The 5-year melanoma specific survival for CLND-negative patients was 5.00 years (IQR 3.23–5.00, range 0.72–5.00) compared to 3.69 (IQR 2.28–4.72, range 1.01–5.00) years in CLND-positive patients (HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.17–6.76, p = 0.020).The models incorporating distribution of metastatic focus and the largest tumor deposit in SN had highest predictive ability. According to Cox proportional hazard regression models, information criterions and c-index, the diameter of tumor deposit > 4 mm with multifocal location in SN despite of number of metastatic SN were the most important parameters. According to the diameter of tumor deposit and distribution of metastatic focus in SN, adequate stratification of positive SN patients was possible and risk classes for patients were identified.

Assessment of Metastatic and Reactive Sentinel Lymph Nodes with B7-H3-Targeted Ultrasound Molecular Imaging: A Longitudinal Study in Mouse Models.

To explore the potential of B7-H3-targeted ultrasound molecular imaging (USMI) for longitudinal assessment and differentiation of metastatic and reactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in mouse models. Metastatic and reactive SLN models were established by injection of 4T1 breast cancer cells and complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) respectively to the 4th mammary fat pad of female BALB/c mice. At day 21, 28, and 35 after inoculation, USMI was performed following intravenous injection of B7-H3-targeted microbubbles (MBB7-H3) or IgG-control microbubbles (MBcontrol). All SLNs were histopathologically examined after the last imaging session. A total of 20 SLNs from tumor-bearing mice (T-SLNs) and five SLNs from CFA-injected mice (C-SLNs) were examined by USMI. Nine T-SLNs were histopathologically positive for metastasis (MT-SLNs). From day 21 to 35, T-SLNs showed a rising trend in MBB7-H3 signal with a steep increase in MT-SLNs at day 35 (213.5 ± 80.8a.u.) as compared to day 28 (87.6 ± 77.2a.u., P = 0.002) and day 21 (55.7 ± 35.5a.u., P < 0.001). At day 35, MT-SLNs had significantly higher MBB7-H3 signal than non-metastatic T-SLNs (NMT-SLNs) (101.9 ± 48.0a.u., P = 0.001) and C-SLNs (38.5 ± 34.0a.u., P = 0.001); MBB7-H3 signal was significantly higher than MBcontrol in MT-SLNs (P = 0.001), but not in NMT-SLNs or C-SLNs (both P > 0.05). A significant correlation was detected between MBB7-H3 signal and volume fraction of metastasis in MT-SLNs (r= 0.76, P = 0.017). B7-H3-targeted USMI allows differentiation of MT-SLNs from NMT-SLNs and C-SLNs in mouse models and has great potential to evaluate tumor burden in SLNs of breast cancer.

Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.

Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†.

Melanoma-specific survival in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes: Relevance of sentinel tumor burden

BackgroundThe tumor burden within the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is not included in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) melanoma classification. Therefore, we analysed the prognostic relevance of the SLN tumor burden in the stage III subgroups. Patients and methodsA total of 736 patients with melanoma with positive SLN and long-term follow-up (mean, 64.4 months; median, 59.0 months) were assessed. SLN tumor burden was evaluated by the maximum diameter of the largest deposit in all patients. ResultsBy univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses, melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of patients in stage IIIA, IIIB and IIIC and lower sentinel tumor burden (cut-offs ≤0.5 mm and ≤1 mm) was significantly better than that in patients with higher sentinel tumor load (>0.5 mm and >1 mm).By multivariate analysis using the Cox model, the maximum diameter of the largest deposit (cut-off ≤0.5 mm versus >0.5 mm and cut-off ≤1 mm as continuous variables) represented an independent prognostic parameter for MSS in stage III patients. Cut-off of 0.5 mm showed a slightly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.617) when than the cut-off of 1 mm (AUC = 0.599). ConclusionThe prognosis of patients with stage III melanoma can be determined more precisely if the SLN tumor burden is considered, also within the existing AJCC subgroups. Thus, this parameter should be included in future classifications, and our study provides benchmarks in estimating prognosis and counselling patients with melanoma with positive sentinel nodes beyond the 8th AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. The optimal cut-off remains for SLN tumor burden remains to be determined, but our results suggest that a cut-off lower than 1 mm is preferable.

Challenges in sentinel node (SN) pathology in the era of adjuvant treatment: The risk of over and undertreatment stress the need for expert pathology review.

9593 Background: With the approval of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma, accurate staging in melanoma patients is important more than ever to prevent over- or undertreatment. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an accurate staging tool, yet the presence of capsular nevi (CN) can lead to a false positive diagnosis. We compared positive SNB and CN patient outcomes and aimed to evaluate the cause of false positive SNB and discern diagnostic pitfalls in their evaluation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of AJCC 7th Edition stage IIIA melanoma patients (N1-2a, non-ulcerated primary tumor) who were treated at our institute between 2000 and 2015. SNB slides were reviewed for this study by an expert melanoma pathologist. Baseline characteristics were assessed for SN+ and CN+ patients. Concordance rates for SNB evaluation before and after revision were documented and diagnostic pitfalls were discerned. Results: 169 patients were diagnosed, 10 could not be reviewed due to lack of evaluable slides. Of these 159 cases, 14 patients originally diagnosed with metastatic melanoma were shown to have capsular nevi (8.8%). Another 2 patients were shown to have melanophages that were incorrectly interpreted as metastases (1.3%). Thus, 10.1% was considered false positive after revision. In 14 patients the SN tumor burden was originally reported &gt; 1 mm, but turned out to have &lt; 1 mm SN tumor burden. 4 patients originally reported as SN tumor burden &lt; 1 mm before revision turned out to have &gt; 1 mm SN tumor burden. These 32 patients (20%) might have potentially been over- or undertreated in the current era of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma. Conclusions: False positive sentinel node results in melanoma are real, they can occur for a number of reasons, but distinguishing metastatic melanoma from benign capsular nevi and melanophages can be a diagnostic challenge. We plead for an expert pathologists’ review in any case, but certainly when using the SNB+ results to determine treatment consequences for SN+ melanoma patients.