Welcome to the Pediatric Obesity column! This column’s mission is to provide information and resources to the pediatric surgical nurse caring for children affected by obesity; this information includes strategies that can be incorporated into the practitioner’s daily practice. LITERATURE REVIEW: “BLAME, SHAME, AND LACK OF SUPPORT: A MULTILEVEL STUDY ON OBESITY MANAGEMENT” Nursing has a rich history of using a holistic approach in caring for patients. This holistic view is reflected in this article by Kirk et al. (2014). The authors use semistructured qualitative interviews to examine the lived experiences of patients affected by obesity; elicit perceptions of healthcare providers caring for individuals with obesity; and study the role of social, institutional, and political entities involved in the management of obesity. Specifically, the researchers looked for common themes in study participant responses to these questions: What perceptions do patients with obesity have regarding their weight when they interact with healthcare professionals and the healthcare system? How do health professionals working in a weight management setting perceive interactions between their patients who are obese and the healthcare system? What do policy makers perceive as barriers to weight management care in the current health care system? After analysis of their data, the researchers identified three major themes in the participant responses. The first theme, blame, permeated the conversation across all participant groups. Individuals living with obesity expressed feelings of guilt, shame, and embarrassment of an inability to control their weight successfully. Despite having knowledge of the complexity of weight loss, these individuals placed the final responsibility of weight loss “failure” on themselves, with resulting frustration and low self-esteem. Many reported that their healthcare practitioner did not address weight issues with them. Others stated that, while they received information repeatedly about how to lose weight, they felt they received little support through the process of implementing weight loss instructions. Life was described as a daily, constant battle requiring enormous mental and emotional energy. Healthcare professionals also expressed feelings of blame for not having the time, expertise, and services to care for their patients with obesity. Many felt they let their patients down; most felt inadequately prepared to help their patients effectively. The second identified theme relates to tensions in obesity management and prevention. Healthcare professionals described a sense of helplessness in not possessing a consistent, effective treatment to provide their patients who are overweight. Therefore, many avoided the conversation to escape the potential tension of failed expectations. In addition, patients with obesity felt unsupported by their providers. Both providers and policy makers expressed frustration and confusion because of experts in obesity arguing about prevention versus treatment methodologies to address the obesity epidemic. The third theme centers on discussion of whether obesity is a disease or a risk factor. Time spent on this conversation diverts energy that perhaps is better utilized by developing improved obesity care and programs. How obesity is classified has broad funding and policy implications. Bias and discrimination against individuals with obesity play a large role in this debate. This article is full of rich data that express voices of participants in the patient, provider, and policy maker triad. The researchers’ findings are applicable at the clinical level to improve understanding of struggles faced by both patient and provider. Additionally, this research addresses the concerns of policy makers who seek to make decisions based on data and compassion. Data from this study has the opportunity to guide conversations between individuals affected by obesity, clinicians, and policy makers in their quest to improve obesity care.