ABSTRACT The Rohingya crisis is one of the most severe humanitarian tragedies of our time, yet its portrayal in international media often lacks justification. Utilizing BERTopic, a transformer-based semi-supervised topic modeling technique, we analyzed 8,074 news articles about the Rohingya crisis, spanning newspapers from ten countries between 2009 and 2023. We aimed to observe the framing of the Rohingya crisis across countries and track frames’ evolution over time. We identified eleven frames: Politics, Departure, Repatriation, Human Rights, Resettlement, Refuge, Relief, Crisis, Retribution, Condolence, and Press Freedom, with the Political frame as the most frequent. Notably, host and non-host countries differed in framing the crisis, with Retribution and Crisis frames exclusive to host countries’ media, while Resettlement and Press Freedom frames were exclusive to non-host countries’ media. Host countries focused on Repatriation, Human Rights, and Relief news, whereas non-host countries prioritized Politics, Departure, and Refuge frames. Additionally, neighboring host countries were less likely to publish news on Resettlement. Changes in frames displayed significant variability across countries, indicating a lack of consistently identifiable patterns and suggesting that news media's framing habits may prioritize national interests over the chronological progression of the crisis.
Read full abstract