This research evaluates the influence of various discontinuity data acquisition methods on three-dimensional rockfall susceptibility assessments, employing a high-resolution 3D point cloud of the Špičunak rock slope in Croatia. Discontinuity mapping was conducted utilising manual and semi-automated methods. Manual mapping was done in open-source software CloudCompare, while semi-automated mapping was done using Discontinuity Set Extractor and two CloudCompare plug-ins, qFacet Fast Marching and qFacet Kd-Tree algorithm. Significant differences were observed between the methods in terms of the number of identified discontinuity planes, sets, mean orientation values, and weighted densities associated with specific sets. Based on the mapping results, three-dimensional rockfall susceptibility maps were generated. The 3D rockfall susceptibility assessment employed a Kinematic Hazard Index (KHI) for planar, wedge, and flexural toppling failure mechanisms, which determines the percentage of discontinuity planes that meet the geometrical conditions specific to each type of failure. The findings underscore that the mapping results greatly affect the 3D rockfall susceptibility assessment, impacting the identification of potential rockfall source areas. The study emphasizes the importance of integrating manual and semi-automated mapping for reliable 3D rockfall susceptibility assessment. Additionally, this study evaluated the effect of varying the number of discontinuity orientation input data on rockfall susceptibility by comparing nine scenarios, each involving a reduction in the number of discontinuity orientation data. The results indicate that accurate discontinuity mapping is more critical than the sheer number of mapped discontinuities for reliable rockfall susceptibility assessment. Therefore, prioritizing the precise determination of discontinuity set numbers and their associated weighted densities is essential for reliable susceptibility evaluations.