Semaglutide In Patients Research Articles

Dosing Patterns of Dulaglutide and Semaglutide in Patients with Type2 Diabetes Mellitus in France and Italy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic disease with several treatment options. Some glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) approved by the European Medicines Agency include dulaglutide, subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, and oral semaglutide. This study examines dulaglutide and semaglutide dosing patterns for T2DM in France and Italy. IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Data identified adults with T2DM prescribed dulaglutide or semaglutide between August 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Cohort1 (incident) and cohort2 (prevalent) users were followed for 12months. In France and Italy, 255,571 and 350,853 patients, respectively, received at least one study GLP-1 RA. Most dulaglutide-naïve patients in France (62%) and approximately half in Italy (49%) started on 1.5mg and remained on this dose for up to 12months (France: 66% cohort1, 88% cohort2; Italy: 73% cohort1, 87% cohort2). In cohort1, s.c. semaglutide users mostly started on 0.25mg (France, 78%; Italy, 61%). At 12months, s.c. semaglutide 1.0mg was most prescribed (France: 58% cohort1, 75% cohort2; Italy: 59% cohort2), with cohort1 in Italy mostly receiving 0.5mg (57%). Most oral semaglutide users in Italy started on 3.0mg (78% cohort1; 68% cohort2), which was increased to 7.0mg (62% cohort1) and 14.0mg (48% cohort2) at 12months. GLP-1 RA dosing patterns, although similar between France and Italy, were heterogeneous over time. As oral semaglutide and higher dulaglutide doses are recent to the market, additional real-world evidence is required to evaluate utilization patterns. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Comparison of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes treated with tirzepatide versus semaglutide: a multi-institutional analysis

Abstract Introduction Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been demonstrated to have cardiovascular benefits in patients with diabetes. Two of the most prescribed medications in this class are tirzepatide and semaglutide. Tirzepatide is a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist, while semaglutide is a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist. Tirzepatide and semaglutide have previously been directly compared to assess efficacy in glycemic control as the primary endpoint. However, there is limited data directly comparing cardiovascular outcomes between the two medications in patients with diabetes. This retrospective cohort study compares the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with diabetes treated with tirzepatide or semaglutide. Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify differences in cardiovascular outcomes between patients with diabetes treated with tirzepatide as compared to semaglutide. Materials and Methods The TriNetX research network was used for this study. Two patient cohorts were generated using International Classification of Disease 10 (ICD-10) codes and medication codes in the TriNetX system. Both cohorts of patients had a history of diabetes (E08-E13) and no prior history of cerebral vascular accident (I63) or myocardial infarction (I21). One cohort received semaglutide and the other tirzepatide. Each cohort was prohibited from receiving the other agent. The cohorts were balanced for age, race, gender, and ethnicity by propensity score matching and the greedy nearest neighbor algorithm resulting in 36,212 patients in each arm. They were then evaluated for the 3-year outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, and death). Results Tirzepatide was associated with statistically significantly fewer MACE outcomes compared to semaglutide for each of the individual endpoints as well as the overall composite endpoint over the 3 year follow up period. Table 1. MACE events for semaglutide and tirzepatide. Table 2. Relative risks for semaglutide MACE endpoints compared to tirzepatide. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, tirzepatide was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to semaglutide in patients with diabetes. These findings suggest that tirzepatide offers superior cardiovascular protection for primary prevention compared to semaglutide and warrant further investigation in future studies and clinical trials.Table 1Table 2

Semaglutide in patients with overweight or obesity and chronic kidney disease without diabetes: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Semaglutide reduces albuminuria and the risk of kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25 ml min-1 1.73 m-2 and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 and <3,500 mg g-1) and body mass index ≥27 kg m-2. Participants were randomized to semaglutide 2.4 mg per week or placebo. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in UACR at week 24. Safety was monitored throughout. Overall, 125 participants were screened, of whom 101 were randomized to semaglutide (n = 51) or placebo (n = 50). Mean age was 55.8 (s.d. 12) years; 40 participants (39.6%) were female; median UACR was 251 mg g-1 (interquartile range 100, 584); mean eGFR was 65.0 (s.d. 25) ml min-1 1.73 m-2; and mean body mass index was 36.2 (s.d. 5.6) kg m-2. Chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 25) and hypertensive CKD (n = 27) were the most common CKD etiologies. Treatment for 24 weeks with semaglutide compared to placebo reduced UACR by -52.1% (95% confidence interval -65.5, -33.4; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more often reported with semaglutide (n = 30) than with placebo (n = 15). Semaglutide treatment for 24 weeks resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction in albuminuria in patients with overweight/obesity and non-diabetic CKD. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04889183 .

Semaglutide in patients with kidney failure and obesity undergoing dialysis and wishing to be transplanted: A prospective, observational, open-label study.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and obesity are major global health challenges, eventually leading to kidney replacement therapy (KRT), but body mass index (BMI) thresholds hinder kidney transplantation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists induce weight loss, thereby offering attractive treatment options; however, their safety and efficacy have not been systematically investigated in patients undergoing dialysis. We conducted a prospective 12-week, open-label trial with 13 patients who had a BMI ≥ 30.00 kg/m2, were undergoing dialysis (12 haemodialysis and 1 peritoneal dialysis) and had not been listed for transplantation due to their weight. Semaglutide was administered once weekly subcutaneously, and the dose was increased from 0.25 mg to 0.5 mg and then to 1 mg. Study endpoints included change in body weight and BMI (primary - statistically evaluated by repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]), side effects, adverse events, blood parameters and patient-reported outcomes (secondary). At baseline, the mean age ± standard deviation of patients was 64.0 ± 6.4 years, the mean weight was 113.9 ± 16.6 kg, and the mean BMI was 37.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2. At week 12, average weight reduction under semaglutide treatment was 4.6 ± 2.4 kg and ranged from 2.0 to 9.7 kg (p < 0.001 for weight and BMI reduction across the study period). One patient discontinued treatment due to nausea/vomiting, two patients died of unrelated causes and six patients reported side effects. Approximately 9 months after the treatment started, three patients were able to seriously reconsider being listed for transplantation. Semaglutide treatment resulted in significant reduction in weight and BMI in patients with obesity undergoing dialysis, while maintaining an acceptable side effect profile comparable to that of the non-dialysis population.

12338 Risk Of Retinopathy In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes On Semaglutide

Abstract Disclosure: A. Gupta: None. M. Nassar: None. H. Ghanim: None. Title: Risk of Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on SemaglutideBackground: The use of semaglutide in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) has raised safety concerns. While previous studies, including a meta-analysis and the SUSTAIN trial, suggested an association between rapid HbA1c reduction and retinopathy progression, recent data question the increased risk with semaglutide. Our study investigates this risk of intensive therapy benefits for the prevention of DR. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health records, analyzing 117,693,426 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on anti-hyperglycemic drugs. We divided patients into those with and without a history of retinopathy, further subdividing them by treatment (Semaglutide, Sitagliptin, and Empagliflozin). After matching for confounders, we analyzed the incidence and progression of retinopathy among 336,338 Semaglutide, 578,117 Sitagliptin, and 434,552 Empagliflozin patients without a history of DR, as well as a cohort with history. Results: In patients without a prior history of DR, semaglutide showed a significant reduction in DR incidence over three years compared to sitagliptin and empagliflozin (p&amp;lt;0.0001). However, in those with a history, the reduction was not statistically significant (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Patients with mild DR on Semaglutide experienced fewer progressions to severe stages (p&amp;lt;0.0001), while outcomes in severe cases were inconclusive.Discussion: Semaglutide may lower the risk of developing DR in patients with T2DM without a prior history of DR and potentially stabilize or improve mild conditions without worsening severe retinopathy. The observed effects could influence treatment choices, emphasizing the need for individualized patient management. Conclusion: Semaglutide appears safe regarding retinopathy risk in patients with T2DM, offering protective benefits in those without history and not exacerbating conditions in those with prior DR. This underscores the drug's potential for comprehensive diabetes management without compromising ocular health. Presentation: 6/3/2024

The cost-effectiveness analysis of semaglutide for the treatment of adult and adolescent patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review.

The present study aimed to systematically collect and synthesize available cost-effectiveness studies of semaglutide in patients with obesity or overweight in comparison with other interventions. We comprehensively searched multiple electronic databases to identify relevant literature. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of studies was appraised using the "Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards" (CHEERS) tool. This study is conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Out of a total of 252 items, after review, 32 articles were fully reviewed, and, finally, 7 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The discount rate was in the range of 1.5-3.5%. Studies included showed semaglutide offered more QALYs than anti-obesity drugs but because of higher cost, in some cases, ICER exceeds the willingness to pay threshold. Results show that semaglutide creates higher total cost compared to conventional interventions in patients with class I, II, and III obesities. Results show that in patients with class I obesity (BMI 33) lifestyle intervention (LI), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), Sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and semaglutide create $124,195; $126,732; $139,971; and $370,776, respectively. The current systematic review showed that semaglutide provides more QALYs and creates more costs in comparison with phentermine-topiramate, phentermine, and naltrexone-bupropion. Semaglutide may be cost-effective with substantial cost reduction. Semaglutide appears to be cost-effective versus diet and exercise (D&E) and liraglutide but it was not cost-effective versus sleeve gastrectomy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and gastric bypass.

211 - Once-weekly semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, obesity and type 2 diabetes: main results from the STEP-HFpEF DM trial

211 - Once-weekly semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, obesity and type 2 diabetes: main results from the STEP-HFpEF DM trial

Efficacy and Safety in a Real-World Study of the New Oral Formulation of Semaglutide in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background/Objectives: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as fundamental components in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The oral formulation represents a novel therapeutic tool but may affect drug efficacy. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous versus oral semaglutide formulations in patients with CKD. Methods: A retrospective study in a real-world setting compared type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease patients, initiating oral semaglutide treatment to a historically matched control group treated with subcutaneous semaglutide. The matching considered factors such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, and sex. Results: Nineteen patients were included in both groups, with a mean age of 68.0. Seventy-two percent were males with a CKD-EPI eGFR of 49.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 12.7 mg/g. Of the study participants, 94% and 79% of patients were on the maximum semaglutide sbc vs. oral dose, while 5.3% and 15.8% were on the sbc vs. oral low dose. Oral semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1C and BMI, identical to the control group (-0.9 and -1.4, p > 0.05). Renal function parameters and blood pressure remained stable throughout the follow-up in both groups. The main side effect was digestive intolerance (affecting three patients in the oral group and two patients in the subcutaneous group, p = 0.6), although the treatment abandonment percentage was similar. Conclusions: The oral formulation of semaglutide demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in glucose control and body weight management in patients with T2DM and CKD, even with a higher proportion of patients receiving low to medium doses. Gastrointestinal side effects were comparable between both oral and subcutaneous formulations.

The effectiveness of 0.5 mg and 1mg of semaglutide in patients with type two diabetes and predictors of response: a retrospective cohort study.

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at doses up to 1 mg. The results from randomized control trials and real-world studies revealed that weekly semaglutide was associated with significant improvements in HbA1c and body weight. To our knowledge, no study assessed the effectiveness of using semaglutide for patients with T2DM in the Saudi population. We aim to assess the effectiveness of once weekly SC 0.5 and 1 mg of semaglutide on HbA1c and weight reduction in patients with T2DM in the Saudi population within 12 months of use, evaluate the predictors of response, and compare the effect of the two doses. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Security Force Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Using electronic medical records of patients with type two diabetes who received semaglutide 0.5 or 1 mg for a total duration of at least 12 months of use. Within the study period of semaglutide use, HbA1c significantly decreased from baseline by -2.1% (-2.3 to -1.91, 95% CI) (P <0.001). While the mean change in weight was -6.19kg (-6.66 to -5.72, 95% CI) (P<0.001). Moreover, BMI, FBG, total cholesterol, LDL, and TG all decreased significantly from baseline (p<0.001). When comparing the sub-groups of 0.5 and 1 mg doses, although results were numerically favorable of 1 mg, there were no statistically significant differences in HbA1c % (-2.1 ± 1.8 vs. -2.1 ± 1.9, p-value= 0.934, respectively), and weight (-6.1 ± 5 vs. -6.2 ± 4.4kg, p-value=0.837, respectively). Significant predictors of HbA1c reduction were the duration of DM, baseline HbA1c, and insulin therapy. While the significant predictor for weight reduction was insulin therapy. This study is document the effectiveness of once-weekly SC semaglutide on glycemic control and weight loss in real-world practice. We recommend a starting goal dose of 0.5 mg and gradual increase of dose based individual patient response. further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of various semagltude doses.

Semaglutide treatment of hypothalamic obesity – a real-life data study

PurposePatients with tumors involving the hypothalamic region are at high risk of developing morbid obesity due to disturbances in the appetite regulative nuclei in hypothalamus. We evaluated the effect of the Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide in patients with hypothalamic obesity.MethodsWe recorded weight changes from real-time data before and after treatment with semaglutide in patients with hypothalamic obesity from our outpatient clinic at the Department of Endocrinology at Rigshospitalet, from September 2020 to November 2023.ResultsA total of 26 patients were included in this study (15 females, median age at initiation of semaglutide was 52 (range 18–65) years). Body mass index (BMI) at initial diagnosis was median 25 (range 20–38) kg/m2 while BMI at initiation of semaglutide was median 38 (range 28–58) kg/m2. All but one patient lost weight during semaglutide treatment with a mean weight loss of 13.4 kg (95% CI 10.3–16.5 kg, p = < 0.001) after 12 months corresponding to a loss in BMI of 4.4 kg/m2 (95% CI 3.4–5.4 kg/m2, p = < 0.001) with a median dosage of semaglutide of 1.6 (range 0.5–2.5) mg. Fifteen patients (58%) lost more than 10% and two patients (8%) lost more than 20% of initial body weight, respectively.ConclusionTreatment with semaglutide shows promising results in reducing body weight in patients with acquired hypothalamic obesity. Whether the weight reduction remains stable after long time follow-up needs further investigation.

Real-World Evaluation of Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain (SEMA-RW Study).

Although, in randomized clinical trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (OW s.c.) has demonstrated superior efficacy in comparison with placebo and active controls in terms of glycemic control and body weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), these results need to be confirmed in a real-world (RW) setting. An RW ambispective study (6 months retrospective and 6 months prospective) was conducted in 10 tertiary hospitals in Spain. We evaluated changes in HbA1c and body weight in patients with T2DM treated with semaglutide OW s.c. Additionally, we analyzed different subgroups of patients treated with semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. A total of 752 patients with a mean age of 60.2 years, a mean HbA1c level of 8.5%, a mean body weight of 101.6 kg, and a mean T2DM duration of 10 years were included. At 12 months, compared with baseline, there was a mean difference of -2.1% in HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) and a mean difference of 9.2 kg in body weight (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between baseline and month 12 in both HbA1c and body weight in the four subgroups receiving semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. Semaglutide OW s.c. was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most commonly reported side effects. In this RW study, 12 months of treatment with semaglutide OW s.c. in patients with T2DM was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycemic control and weight loss, regardless of the glucose-lowering therapy received, and the overall safety profile was positive.

Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity and prevalent heart failure: a prespecified analysis of the SELECT trial

Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with overweight or obesity, but the effects of this drug on outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure are unknown. We report a prespecified analysis of the effect of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg on ischaemic and heart failure cardiovascular outcomes. We aimed to investigate if semaglutide was beneficial in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a history of heart failure compared with placebo; if there was a difference in outcome in patients designated as having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; and if the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure was related to baseline characteristics or subtype of heart failure. The SELECT trial was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, event-driven phase 3 trial in 41 countries. Adults aged 45 years and older, with a BMI of 27 kg/m2 or greater and established cardiovascular disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a block size of four using an interactive web response system in a double-blind manner to escalating doses of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide over 16 weeks to a target dose of 2·4 mg, or placebo. In a prespecified analysis, we examined the effect of semaglutide compared with placebo in patients with and without a history of heart failure at enrolment, subclassified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, or unclassified heart failure. Endpoints comprised MACE (a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death); a composite heart failure outcome (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation or urgent hospital visit for heart failure); cardiovascular death; and all-cause death. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597. Between Oct 31, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 17 604 patients with a mean age of 61·6 years (SD 8·9) and a mean BMI of 33·4 kg/m2 (5·0) were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (8803 [50·0%] patients) or placebo (8801 [50·0%] patients). 4286 (24·3%) of 17 604 patients had a history of investigator-defined heart failure at enrolment: 2273 (53·0%) of 4286 patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, 1347 (31·4%) had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and 666 (15·5%) had unclassified heart failure. Baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without heart failure. Patients with heart failure had a higher incidence of clinical events. Semaglutide improved all outcome measures in patients with heart failure at random assignment compared with those without heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·60-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·64-0·98 for the heart failure composite endpoint; 0·76, 0·59-0·97 for cardiovascular death; and 0·81, 0·66-1·00 for all-cause death; all pinteraction>0·19). Treatment with semaglutide resulted in improved outcomes in both the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·87 for MACE; 0·79, 0·58-1·08 for the composite heart failure endpoint) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction groups (0·69, 0·51-0·91 for MACE; 0·75, 0·52-1·07 for the composite heart failure endpoint), although patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction had higher absolute event rates than those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. For MACE and the heart failure composite, there were no significant differences in benefits across baseline age, sex, BMI, New York Heart Association status, and diuretic use. Serious adverse events were less frequent with semaglutide versus placebo, regardless of heart failure subtype. In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diease and overweight or obesity, treatment with semaglutide 2·4 mg reduced MACE and composite heart failure endpoints compared with placebo in those with and without clinical heart failure, regardless of heart failure subtype. Our findings could facilitate prescribing and result in improved clinical outcomes for this patient group. Novo Nordisk.

Weekly Journal Scan: improved renal outcomes by semaglutide in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes in FLOW trial.

Weekly Journal Scan: improved renal outcomes by semaglutide in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes in FLOW trial.

A pre-specified analysis of the SELECT trial suggests a kidney benefit of semaglutide in patients without diabetes.

A pre-specified analysis of the SELECT trial suggests a kidney benefit of semaglutide in patients without diabetes.

The Use of Semaglutide in Patients With Renal Failure-A Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectiveSemaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist is approved for weight loss and diabetes treatment, but limited literature exists regarding semaglutide use in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, this project assessed the safety and efficacy of semaglutide among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD stage 4), eGFR<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD stage 5) or on dialysis. MethodsThis is a retrospective electronic medical record based analysis of consecutive patients with advanced CKD (defined as CKD 4 or greater) who were started on semaglutide (injectable or oral). Data was collected between January 2018 and January 2023. Investigators verified CKD diagnosis and manually extracted data. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, paired t test, linear mixed effects models and Wilcoxon signed rank test. ResultsSeventy-six patients with CKD 4 or greater who initiated semaglutide were included. Most patients had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (96.0%), and most were males (53.9%). The mean age was 66.8 y (SD 11.5) with the mean body mass index was 36.2 (SD 7.5). The initial doses were 3 mg orally and 0.25 mg by injection. Maximum prescribed dose was 1 mg (injectable) in 28 (45.2%) patients and 14 mg (orally) in 2 (14.2%) patients. Patients received semaglutide for a median duration of 17.4 (IQR 0.43, 48.8) months. Forty-eight (63.1%) patients reported no adverse effects associated with the therapy. Mean weight decreased from 106.2 (SD 24.2) to 101.3 (SD 27.3) kg (P < .001). Eight patients (16%) with type 2 diabetes mellitus T2DM discontinued insulin after starting semaglutide. Mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.0% (SD 1.7) to 7.1% (SD 1.3) (P < .001). Adverse effects were the primary reason for semaglutide discontinuation (37.0%), with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain being the most common complaints. ConclusionsBased on this retrospective study semaglutide appears to be tolerated by most individuals with CKD 4 or greater despite associated gastrointestinal side effects similar to those observed in patients with better kidney function and leads to an improvement of glycemic control and insulin discontinuation in patients with T2DM. Modest weight loss (approximately 4.6% of the total body weight) was observed on the prescribed doses. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to comprehensively assess the risks and benefits of semaglutide in patients with CKD 4 or greater and obesity.

Effect of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist semaglutide on alcohol consumption in alcohol-preferring male vervet monkeys.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists reduce alcohol consumption in rodents and non-human primates. Semaglutide is a new long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist, widely used in the clinic against type 2 diabetes and obesity. It is also reported to reduce alcohol intake in rodents. This study investigates the possible inhibitory effect of semaglutide on alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring African green monkeys. We performed a vehicle-controlled study on male monkeys that had demonstrated a preference for alcohol. In the monkeys selected for voluntary alcohol drinking, alcohol consumption was measured for ten days at baseline (Monday to Friday for two weeks). During this period, the monkeys had access to alcohol 4h per day and free access to water 24h per day. After two weeks of baseline measurements, the monkeys were randomized to semaglutide or vehicle. Each group consisted of ten monkeys, and the two groups were balanced with respect to baseline alcohol intake. Following the baseline period, the monkeys were treated with escalating doses of semaglutide (up to 0.05mg/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously twice weekly for two weeks during which period alcohol was not available. After uptitration, the monkeys had access to alcohol 4h daily for 20 days (Monday to Friday for 4 weeks), and alcohol consumption was measured. During this alcohol exposure period, treatment with semaglutide (0.05mg/kg twice weekly) or vehicle continued for three weeks followed by a one-week washout period. Compared to the vehicle, semaglutide significantly reduced alcohol intake. There were no signs of emetic events or changes in water intake. These data demonstrate for the first time the potent effect of semaglutide in reducing voluntary alcohol intake in non-human primates and further substantiate the need for clinical trials investigating the effect of semaglutide in patients with alcohol-use disorder.

Blood pressure effect of semaglutide in patients with hypertension: an individual patient data analysis of randomised controlled trials

Blood pressure effect of semaglutide in patients with hypertension: an individual patient data analysis of randomised controlled trials

#1981 Experience with the use of semaglutide in cardiorenal syndrome patients followed in a cardiorenal unit (CRU)

Abstract Background and Aims GLP-1 receptor agonists are antihyperglycemic drugs that have shown an interesting cardio and nephroprotective effect beyond glycemic control and also induce weight loss, which is likely a facilitating element in the renal and cardioprotection of patients with elevated BMI. Patients with cardiorenal syndrome are often approached as particularly complex cases, which can lead to the underutilization of certain therapeutic groups. We have analyzed the use of semaglutide in patients followed in the CRU of Puerta de Hierro University Hospital to evaluate the drug's efficacy in glycemic and weight control and its safety profile. Method Retrospective real-life analysis performed in patients who received semaglutide while being under follow-up in the CRU, from January 21-December 22. Follow-up time was 6 months. Patients who had previously been on GLP1-AR treatment, on renal replacement therapy, or while waiting for any percutaneous or surgical cardiovascular procedure were excluded from the study. Results 41 patients, 14 on oral semaglutide and 24 on subcutaneous semaglutide were analyzed. Demographic data and main comorbidities are shown in the table and were similar in both formulations. 53% of the patients were on maximum semaglutide dose at the end of follow-up (59.3% sbc and 42.9% oral, p 0.3). Weight loss and decrease in HbA1C% were significant without differences between formulations. We observed a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure of 11.1 (18) p 0.007 also similar in both drug formulations. No significant modifications in renal parameters were observed during follow-up. Adverse events were observed in 9 patients (22%), mainly gastrointestinal intolerance, and were more frequent with oral formulation (50% vs. 7.4%, p 0.004). 6 patients (14%) stopped semaglutide treatment without differences between formulation groups. 3 patients experienced at least one episode of HF decompensation, but no other events, hospitalizations, or deaths were observed. 3 (7.9%) patients experienced an eGFR decrease of&amp;gt; 30% without differences among the formulation groups. Conclusion We conclude that semaglutide in both formulations is an excellent option for glycemic and weight control in CRS patients’ blood pressure, with an additional significant improvement in blood pressure control and a good safety profile in this special population.

Semaglutide and NT-proBNP in Obesity-Related HFpEF: Insights From the STEP-HFpEF Program

BackgroundThe glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, semaglutide, improved health status and reduced body weight in patients with obesity-related heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the STEP-HFpEF (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity and HFpEF) program. Whether benefits were due to mechanical unloading or effects on HF pathobiology is uncertain. ObjectivesThis study sought to determine if semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with obesity-related HFpEF and compare treatment responses by baseline NT-proBNP. MethodsThis was a prespecified secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (STEP-HFpEF [Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes]) testing effects of semaglutide in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. The main outcomes were change in NT-proBNP at 52 weeks and change in the dual primary endpoints of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score and body weight by baseline NT-proBNP. ResultsIn total, 1,145 patients were randomized. Semaglutide compared with placebo reduced NT-proBNP at 52 weeks (estimated treatment ratio: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91; P = 0.0002). Improvements in health status were more pronounced in those with higher vs lower baseline NT-proBNP (estimated difference: tertile 1: 4.5 points, 95% CI: 0.8–8.2; tertile 2: 6.2 points, 95% CI: 2.4-10.0; tertile 3: 11.9 points, 95% CI: 8.1-15.7; P interaction = 0.02; baseline NT-proBNP as a continuous variable: P interaction = 0.004). Reductions in body weight were consistent across baseline NT-proBNP levels (P interaction = 0.21). ConclusionsIn patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide reduced NT-proBNP. Participants with higher baseline NT-proBNP had a similar degree of weight loss but experienced larger reductions in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations with semaglutide than those with lower NT-proBNP.

Efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity.

Semaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has shown promise in weight management and cardiovascular outcomes in other populations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of semaglutide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction(HFpEF) patients with obesity. A retrospective study analyzed 318 patients with HFpEF, of which 104 received semaglutide and 214 received placebo. Primary endpoints included evaluating changes in exercise capacity and weight management. Semaglutide treatment led to significant improvements in the primary endpoints. Patients in the semaglutide group demonstrated substantial enhancements in exercise capacity, as measured by the 6-min walk distance, compared to the placebo group (mean difference 15.1 meters, 95% CI 5.8 to 24.4, p = 0.002). Additionally, semaglutide resulted in substantial weight loss compared to placebo (mean difference -2.9%, 95% CI -4.1--1.7, p = 0.001). Several secondary endpoints, including reductions in C-reactive protein levels and improvements in other clinical parameters, further supported the efficacy of semaglutide. Adverse events were generally well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns. Semaglutide demonstrated significant clinical benefits in HFpEF patients with obesity, as evidenced by improved symptoms, physical function, and weight reduction.