Semaglutide Group Research Articles

Semaglutide improved sperm morphology in obese men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and functional hypogonadism.

To compare the effects of semaglutide and testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) on semen quality and parameters of functional hypogonadism (FH) in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. We designed a randomised open-label trial in 25 men with type 2 diabetes (aged 50 [46-60] years, BMI 35.9 [32.8-38.7] kg/m2) and FH randomised to semaglutide (SEMA) 1 mg/week or intramuscular testosterone undecanoate (TRT) 1000 mg/10-12 weeks for 24 weeks. Semen analysis and parameters of FH were measured at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment. Participants completed questionnaires of the International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) and the Aging Symptoms in Men (AMS). The quality of baseline sperm parameters of our study cohort was poor, below the 5th percentile of reference values. In the SEMA group, there was a significant increase in morphologically normal sperm from baseline to the end of the study (2% [2; 3.5] vs. 4% [2; 5.5]; p = 0.012), whereas sperm concentration and total number decreased significantly in the TRT group. Compared to TRT, the SEMA group had a significantly higher number of morphologically normal sperm, sperm concentration and total number. Both groups experienced an increase in total testosterone and improvement in the AMS score, whereas the IIEF-15 score significantly improved only in the TRT group. Semaglutide markedly improved sperm morphology, total testosterone levels and symptoms of hypogonadism. These findings highlight semaglutide's potential as a therapeutic approach for men with obesity-related FH who desire fertility. NCT06489457, www. gov.

Real-World Comparison of Oral Versus Injectable Semaglutide for the Reduction of Hemoglobin A1C and Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

No head-to-head comparisons of semaglutide formulations currently exist in the literature. In practice, many may think that oral and injectable semaglutide formulations are interchangeable, although there is currently limited real-world data to determine whether this is accurate. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral versus injectable semaglutide on hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) and weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This was a retrospective single-center review of adult patients who had a diagnosis of T2D and were treated with oral or injectable semaglutide between November 1, 2019, and July 31, 2022. Primary outcome was a comparison of changes in HbA1C (%) and weight (kg) from baseline to 6 months between patients receiving oral versus injectable semaglutide, stratified according to highest dose received. Secondary outcomes included frequency of dose reductions and discontinuations, achievement of clinical goals, and presence of an embedded clinical pharmacist at patients' primary care office. A total of 105 patients were included. Patients experienced mean decreases in HbA1C and weight from baseline to 6 months of -1.75% (P < 0.001) and -3.64 kg (P = 0.015), respectively, in the oral semaglutide group and -1.35% (P < 0.001) and -5.26 kg (P < 0.001), respectively, in the injectable semaglutide group. When directly comparing semaglutide formulations, oral semaglutide demonstrated a 0.4% greater numerical reduction in HbA1C (P = 0.523) and injectable semaglutide demonstrated a 1.62-kg greater numerical reduction in weight (P = 0.312). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently with oral semaglutide than with injectable semaglutide (16.7% vs 4.9%). Discontinuation due to AEs was more common with oral semaglutide. In this study, patients with T2D who received oral semaglutide demonstrated greater reductions in HbA1C, whereas those treated with injectable semaglutide had greater reductions in weight, although there were no statistically significant reductions in HbA1C or weight between the 2 formulations. Rates of AEs and discontinuation were more common in the oral semaglutide group.

Semaglutide utilization associated with reduced ninety-day postoperative complications following single-level posterior lumbar fusion for patients with type II diabetes

Background ContextSemaglutide (the active agent in medications such as Ozempic®) has emerged as an increasingly popular medication in the management of diabetes due to its superior clinical efficacy compared with other medications. Patients undergoing surgery, such as posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), may be on these medications for type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). While the correlation of T2DM with inferior PLF outcomes is known, considering the potential impact of semaglutide on the odds of postoperative complications has not previously been characterized. PurposeTo investigate the potential correlation of semaglutide on 90-day postoperative adverse events following single-level PLF for those with T2DM who are or are not concurrently taking insulin. Study Design/SettingA retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2010 – Q2 2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database. Patient SampleT2DM patients (with or without concurrent insulin use) undergoing single-level PLF (with or without interbody fusion) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Exclusion criteria included: patients less than 18 years of age, those undergoing concurrent cervical, thoracic, anterior, or multi-level fusion procedures, and those with trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosed within three months of surgery. Outcome MeasuresIncidence of 90-day aggregated any, severe, and minor adverse events (AAE, SAE, and MAE, respectively), emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions. MethodsPatients with a prior diagnosis of T2DM not using insulin (T2DM-insulin) and T2DM concurrently using insulin (T2DM+insulin) undergoing PLF were identified. Patients within each group who utilized semaglutide in the year prior to surgery were identified and matched 1:4 with non-semaglutide T2DM-insulin and non-semaglutide T2DM+insulin patients, respectively, based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), obesity, tobacco use, metformin use, and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use. The incidence of 90-day adverse events between groups was compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. Bonferroni correction was utilized to reduce the risk of type I error. ResultsOf all T2DM patients undergoing PLF, semaglutide use was noted for 227 (0.73%) of T2DM-insulin patients, and 244 (2.17%) of T2DM+insulin patients. Once matched, there were 191 and 148 in the semaglutide groups, respectively.For the PLF T2DM-insulin analysis, those using semaglutide were at significantly lower odds of AAE (odds ratio [OR] 0.43), MAE (OR 0.45), and ED visits (OR 0.34) (p<0.001 for all), but not of SAEs or readmissions.For the PLF T2DM+insulin analysis, those using semaglutide were at significantly lower odds of AAE (OR 0.40, p<0.001), SAE (OR 0.43, p=0.004), MAE (OR 0.34, p<0.001), and ED visits (OR 0.26, p<0.001), but not readmissions. ConclusionsThe current study found consistent reductions in aggregated 90-day adverse events, but similar odds of hospital readmission for T2DM patients undergoing PLF taking semaglutide preoperatively. These encouraging findings of reduced postoperative complications suggest further prospective analysis, as the observed findings suggest clinical benefit to semaglutide being utilized by the studied patient population.

Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Persons with Obesity and Knee Osteoarthritis

BackgroundWeight reduction has been shown to alleviate symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee, including pain. The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on outcomes in knee osteoarthritis among persons with obesity has not been well studied.MethodsWe conducted a 68-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at 61 sites in 11 countries. Participants with obesity (a body-mass index [BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters] of ≥30) and a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of moderate knee osteoarthritis with at least moderate pain were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2.4 mg) or placebo, in addition to counseling on physical activity and a reduced-calorie diet. The primary end points were the percentage change in body weight and the change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting worse outcomes) from baseline to week 68. A key confirmatory secondary end point was the physical-function score on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), version 2 (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater well-being).ResultsA total of 407 participants were enrolled. The mean age was 56 years, the mean BMI 40.3, and the mean WOMAC pain score 70.9. A total of 81.6% of the participants were women. The mean change in body weight from baseline to week 68 was −13.7% with semaglutide and −3.2% with placebo (P<0.001). The mean change in the WOMAC pain score at week 68 was −41.7 points with semaglutide and −27.5 points with placebo (P<0.001). Participants in the semaglutide group had a greater improvement in SF-36 physical-function score than those in the placebo group (mean change, 12.0 points vs. 6.5 points; P<0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. Adverse events that led to permanent discontinuation of the trial regimen occurred in 6.7% of the participants in the semaglutide group and in 3.0% in the placebo group, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common reason for discontinuation.ConclusionsAmong participants with obesity and knee osteoarthritis with moderate-to-severe pain, treatment with once-weekly injectable semaglutide resulted in significantly greater reductions in body weight and pain related to knee osteoarthritis than placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; STEP 9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05064735.)

Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1RA) receptor agonists possess multiple favourable metabolic, anti-inflammatory effects and their use is associated with marked body weight reduction. More importantly, this drug class has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at high cardiovascular risk or with established cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, current guidelines recommend the use of GLP-1RA sas first-line antidiabetic therapies in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Semaglutide is a potent GLP-1RA used in the treatment of T2DM with proven cardiovascular benefits. It is currently available in formulations for oral and subcutaneous administration. The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used. Results Overall, this meta-analysis shows that semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to placebo (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I2 92%) or when comparing semaglutide treatment versus a control group consisting of patients medicated with other glucose-lowering drugs (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 3 82%). The stratified analysis was performed by analysing only the trials that used a placebo group as comparator, When the trials were analysed according to the different dosing schemes (subcutaneous vs. oral), the results were not statistically significantly different (oral semaglutide group: SMD -0.33; 95% CI -0.75 to 0.08, I2 95%); semaglutide subcutaneous dose group: SMD -0.69; 95% CI -0.78 to -0.60, I2 74%); interaction p = 0.098. Furthermore, when the trials were analysed according to the included populations (patients with or without T2DM), the results were similar (patients with T2DM: SMD -0.32; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.14, I2 86%); patients without T2DM: SMD -0.82; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.74, I2 58%); interaction p = &amp;lt; 0.0001. Conclusion The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of semaglutide was associated with a reduction in inflammation irrespective of the population evaluated or the treatment regimen used. These findings would explain one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events.

Relationship between residual gastric content and peri-operative semaglutide use assessed by gastric ultrasound: a prospective observational study.

Semaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist known to delay gastric emptying. Despite a growing body of evidence, its peri-operative safety profile remains uncertain, particularly with regard to the risk of increased residual gastric content and aspiration of gastric contents during anaesthesia. We hypothesised that semaglutide interruption of ≤ 10 days before elective surgical procedures is insufficient to reduce or normalise the residual gastric content, despite fasting intervals that comply with current guidelines. In this prospective observational study, we recruited patients who received pre-operative once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide within 10 days of the procedure (semaglutide group) and control patients who had not been exposed to semaglutide (non-semaglutide group). On the day of surgery, all patients underwent pre-operative point-of-care gastric ultrasound to evaluate their residual gastric content. Increased residual gastric content was defined as any solid content or > 1.5 ml.kg-1 of clear fluids as assessed by gastric ultrasound. We recruited 220 patients, 107 in the semaglutide group and 113 in the non-semaglutide group. Increased residual gastric content was found in 43/107 patients (40%) in the semaglutide group and 3/113 (3%) in the non-semaglutide group (p < 0.001). In propensity-weighted analysis, semaglutide use (OR 36.97, 95%CI 16.54-99.32), age (OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.93-0.98) and male sex (OR 2.28, 95%CI 1.29-4.06) were significantly associated with increased residual gastric content. There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents. Pre-operative semaglutide use within 10 days of elective surgical procedures was independently associated with increased risk of residual gastric content on pre-operative gastric ultrasound assessment.

Effectiveness and Side Effect Incidence in a Real-World Digital Weight-Loss Service Using Compounded Semaglutide: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) were originally developed in the late 1980s as a class of antidiabetic medication. However, research over the past decade has found them to be a safe and effective weight-loss agent, which has led to the approval of GLP-1 RAs such as Semaglutide as a supplement to lifestyle obesity interventions in multiple countries. When Semaglutide has become commercially unavailable, digital weight-loss services (DWLSs) have prescribed a compounded form of the medication—a practice in which health professionals formulate a replica of the commercial medication to serve ongoing patient needs. Although compounding has been relatively common over the past century, prominent medical bodies have argued that compounding a relatively novel medication such as Semaglutide represents a major safety risk. This study retrospectively compared the weight and side effect outcomes of patients from a large Australian DWLS whose lifestyle coaching was supplemented with either compounded or pure Semaglutide (both groups following the same titration schedule). All data were extracted from the service’s central data repository. To be included in the weight loss analysis, patients needed to have received a minimum of four monthly medication orders between June 2023 and May 2024 and have submitted weight data between 90 and 150 days after the arrival of their first order. All patients who received at least one medication order within the same period were included in the side effect analysis. The mean four-month weight loss percentage was statistically lower in the compounded Semaglutide group (N = 923, M = 9.11, SD = ±5.76) compared to those in the pure Semaglutide group (n = 1858, M = 9.87, SD = ±6.46), t (2032) = −3.15, p = 0.0017. A statistically lower proportion of patients in the compounded Semaglutide group (71.61%) reported at least one side effect than patients in the pure Semaglutide group (77.40%) during the study period, X2 (1, N = 7683) = 32.32, p &lt; 0.001. When side effects were disaggregated into severity categories, a statistical difference was only observed in mild side effects, X2 (1, N = 7683) = 59.16, p &lt; 0.001. A significantly higher rate of patients from the pure Semaglutide group achieved the ten (50.54% vs. 44.64%), X2 (1, N = 7683) = 10.34, p &lt; 0.001, and fifteen (21.42% vs. 12.78%), X2 (1, N = 7683) = 30.43, p &lt; 0.001, percent weight loss thresholds than patients from the compounded Semaglutide group. The findings indicate that compounded Semaglutide can be used as a component of tightly controlled DWLSs with slightly less effectiveness and but with slightly lower side effect incidence when compared to pure Semaglutide.

Bioengineered Nanomedicines Targeting the Intestinal Fc Receptor Achieve the Improved Glucoregulatory Effect of Semaglutide in a Type 2 Diabetic Mice Model.

The oral administration of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, semaglutide, remains a hurdle due to its limited bioavailability. Herein, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeted nanoparticles (NPs) were designed to enhance the oral delivery of semaglutide. The nanocarriers were covalently linked to the FcRn-binding peptide FcBP or the affibody molecule ZFcRn that specifically binds to the human FcRn (hFcRn) in a pH-dependent manner. These FcRn-targeted ligands were selected over the endogenous ligands of the receptor (albumin and IgG) due to their smaller size and simpler structure, which could facilitate the transport of functionalized NPs through the tissues. The capacity of FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs in controlling the blood glucose levels was evaluated in an hFcRn transgenic mice model, where type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was induced via intraperitoneal injection of nicotinamide followed by streptozotocin. The encapsulation of semaglutide into FcRn-targeted NPs was translated in an improved glucoregulatory effect in T2DM-induced mice when compared to the oral free semaglutide or nontargeted NP groups, after daily oral administrations for 7 days. Notably, a similar glucose-lowering response was observed between both FcRn-targeted NPs and the subcutaneous semaglutide groups. An increase in insulin pancreatic content and a recovery in β cell mass were visualized in the mice treated with FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs. The biodistribution of fluorescently labeled NPs through the gastrointestinal tract demonstrated that the nanosystems targeting the hFcRn are retained longer in the ileum and colorectum, where the expression of FcRn is more prevalent, than nontargeted NPs. Therefore, FcRn-targeted nanocarriers proved to be an effective platform for improving the pharmacological effect of semaglutide in a T2DM-induced mice model.

The blood pressure-lowering property of subcutaneous semaglutide: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide (GLP1) receptor agonist with unprecedented weight-lowering and anti-hyperglycemic properties. Recent clinical trials reported that subcutaneous semaglutide can modulate blood pressure; however, its effect on blood pressure widely varied in different studies and different subgroups of patients. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from the inception to July 18, 2024. Due to high heterogeneity, a random-effects model was adopted to pool data. Twenty clinical trials with 15,312 participants in the placebo group and 18,231 participants in the semaglutide group were included in this study. Subcutaneous semaglutide significantly decreased both systolic (WMD - 3.71 mmHg, 95% CI (-4.29, -3.13), I2: 50.2%) and diastolic (WMD - 1.10 mmHg, 95% CI (-1.58, -0.63), I2: 69.7%) blood pressure. Subgroup analyses indicated that the blood pressure-lowering property of subcutaneous semaglutide was greater among patients without diabetes, with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), baseline body mass index (BMI) greater than 35kg/m2, dose of semaglutide more than 1mg/week, baseline systolic blood pressure equal or less than 130 mmHg, weight loss greater than 10kg, and BMI reduction greater than 3kg/m2. In addition, a treatment length of 50 to 100 weeks was associated with greater blood pressure-lowering effects in subgroup analysis. After adjusting for other factors, meta-regression revealed that placebo-adjusted weight change was independently correlated with the effect of semaglutide on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Subcutaneous semaglutide can significantly decrease systolic and diastolic blood pressure, particularly in selected groups of patients.

Evaluation of gastric content in fasting patient during semaglutide use: an observational study

BackgroundThe evident influence of GLP-1 agonists as semaglutide on gastric emptying even in adherence to recommended fasting protocols instigates debates. ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of semaglutide on gastric content by gastric ultrasonography in volunteers. SettingPrivate hospital. MethodsThe present study is an observational, cross-sectional, and single-center study. We included 30 consecutive volunteers aged ≥18 years who had undergone a minimum fasting period of 8 hours for solid foods and 2 hours for clear, residue-free liquids. The intervention group consisted of 15 volunteers who had used semaglutide within the last 7 days, whereas the control group consisted of 15 volunteers who had never used semaglutide. The main objective was to determine whether the stomach was full or not. ResultsBetween June 2023 and August 2023, a total of 30 adult volunteers were included in the study, and no participant was excluded. The semaglutide group exhibited a higher prevalence of full stomach (11 of 15 [73%] versus 1 of 15 [7%], P < .001; adjusted to age P = .003). The semaglutide group also exhibited a higher prevalence of early satiety (10 of 15 [67%] versus 0 of 15 [0%], P < .001), loss of appetite (10 of 15 [67%] versus 0 of 15 [0%], P < .001), gastric fullness (8 of 15 [53%] versus 0 of 15 [0%], P = .002), and nausea (7 of 15 [47%] versus 1 of 15 [7%], P = .035). Additionally, there is no case in the semaglutide group with no gastric contents. ConclusionsThe use of semaglutide is associated with full stomach even after appropriate overnight fasting. Semaglutide is also associated with increased gastrointestinal symptoms such as loss of appetite, early satiety, gastric fullness, and nausea.

Effectiveness and safety of semaglutide in overweight/obese adults with or without type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The objective of the study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in overweight or obese adults with or without type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: The study, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023450979), was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis. Using a combination of subject matter and free words, a comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials of semaglutide in overweight or obese adults with or without Type 2 diabetes mellitus from January 1, 2020, to July 14, 2023. The primary outcomes were the changes in body weight and adverse drug reaction (ADR). Random or fixed effects models were used in meta-analysis, pooling data as relative risks (RRs) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool was used to assess quality. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Results: A total of 2490 publications were retrieved. Fifteen publications were finally included, totaling 6984 overweight or obese adult patients. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, the semaglutide group was reduced more significantly in body weight (MD = −7.49, 95% CI [−9.92, −5.07], P &lt; 0.001), body mass index (MD = −3.35, 95% CI [−4.79, −1.92], P &lt; 0.001), waist circumference (MD = −7.26, 95% CI [−9.94, −4.58], P &lt; 0.001), as well as glycosylated hemoglobin (RR = −0.66, 95% CI [−1.07, −0.25], P = 0.002), fasting blood glucose values (RR = −4.81, 95% CI [−7.03, −2.60], P &lt; 0.001), and systolic blood pressure (RR = −3.37, 95% CI [−5.32, −1.42], P &lt; 0.001), and the proportion of patients who lost &gt; 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of their overall body weight, respectively (RR = 3.19, 95% CI [1.89, 5.36], P &lt; 0.001), (RR = 4.74, 95% CI [2.78, 8.11], P &lt; 0.001), (RR = 6.17, 95% CI [3.88, 9.82], P &lt; 0.001), and (RR = 9.14, 95% CI [6.05, 13.80], P &lt; 0.001) were also superior to the control group. Regarding safety, the incidence of total ADR in the semaglutide group was close to the placebo group. Still, gastrointestinal adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea were higher than those in the control group. Conclusion: Semaglutide can effectively lose weight in overweight or obese adults with or without diabetes, potentially providing cardiovascular benefits; however, gastrointestinal adverse should be closely monitored.

Effects of Semaglutide on Heart Failure Outcomes in Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease in the FLOW Trial

BackgroundPeople with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for heart failure (HF) and premature death from cardiovascular (CV) causes. The FLOW (Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease), which enrolled participants with T2D and CKD, demonstrated that semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduced the incidence of the primary composite outcome (persistent ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, kidney replacement therapy, and kidney or CV death) by 24%. ObjectivesThis prespecified analysis examined the effects of semaglutide on HF outcomes in this high-risk population. MethodsParticipants were randomized (1:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg or placebo. The prespecified main outcome was a composite of HF events (new onset or worsening of HF leading to an unscheduled hospital admission or an urgent visit, with initiation of or intensified diuretic/vasoactive therapy) or CV death. HF data were collected by the investigator. CV death was adjudicated by an independent committee. ResultsA total of 3,533 randomized participants were followed for a median of 3.4 years. HF was present at baseline in 342 participants (19.4%) in the semaglutide group and 336 (19.0%) in the placebo group. In the overall trial population, semaglutide increased time to first HF events or CV death (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.87; P = 0.0005), HF events alone (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92; P = 0.0068), and CV death alone (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56-0.89; P = 0.0036). The risk reduction for the composite HF outcome was similar in those with (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.98; P = 0.0338) and without (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.89; P = 0.0028) HF at baseline. The risk of HF outcomes (HF events or CV death) was generally higher in participants categorized as NYHA functional class III and those with the HF reduced ejection fraction subtype, regardless of treatment. ConclusionsSemaglutide substantially reduced the risk of time to first composite outcome of HF events or CV death, as well as HF events and CV death alone, in a high-risk population with T2D and CKD. These effects were consistent regardless of history of HF. (A Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease [FLOW]; NCT03819153)

Semaglutide versus placebo in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials

Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (hereafter referred to as HFpEF) is the most common type of heart failure and is associated with a high risk of hospitalisation and death, especially in patients with overweight, obesity, or type 2 diabetes. In the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations in participants with HFpEF. Whether semaglutide also reduces clinical heart failure events in this group remains to be established. We conducted a post-hoc pooled, participant-level analysis of four randomised, placebo-controlled trials (SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM) to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2·4 mg in SELECT, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM; 1·0 mg in FLOW) on heart failure events. The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF, the SELECT trial enrolled participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, and the FLOW trial enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Hence, for this analysis, we include all participants from the STEP-HFpEF trials and those with an investigator-reported history of HFpEF from SELECT and FLOW. The main outcomes for this analysis were the composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or first worsening heart failure event (defined as hospitalisation or urgent visit due to heart failure), time to first worsening heart failure event, and time to cardiovascular death. Efficacy and safety endpoints were analysed with the full analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment, according to the intention-to-treat principle). The SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597, NCT03819153, NCT04788511, and NCT04916470, respectively, and all are complete. Across the four trials, 3743 (16·8%) of 22 282 participants had a history of HFpEF (1914 assigned to semaglutide and 1829 assigned to placebo). In this group of participants with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure events (103 [5·4%] of 1914 in the semaglutide group had events vs 138 [7·5%] of 1829 in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·53-0·89]; p=0·0045). Semaglutide also reduced the risk of worsening heart failure events (54 [2·8%] vs 86 [4·7%]; HR 0·59 [0·41-0·82]; p=0·0019). No significant effect on cardiovascular death alone was seen (59 [3·1%] vs 67 [3·7%]; HR 0·82 [0·57-1·16]; p=0·25). A lower proportion of patients treated with semaglutide had serious adverse events than did those who were treated with placebo (572 [29·9%] vs 708 [38·7%]). In patients with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events, and worsening heart failure events alone, whereas its effect on cardiovascular death alone was not significant. These data support the use of semaglutide as an efficacious therapy to reduce the risk of clinical heart failure events in patients with HFpEF, for whom few treatment options are currently available. Novo Nordisk.

Effects of semaglutide on gut microbiota, cognitive function and inflammation in obese mice.

This study aims to investigate the effects of semaglutide on gut microbiota, cognitive function, and inflammation in obese mice. Twenty-four C57BL/6J male mice were randomly assigned to three groups: a normal-chow diet group (NCD, n=8), high-fat diet group (HFD, n=8), and HFD+semaglutide group (Sema, n=8). The mice were fed a HFD to establish an animal model of obesity and then administered with semaglutide or saline for 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze test. Serum pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured. 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was used to explore gut microbiota characteristics in obese mice. Obese mice showed significant cognitive impairment and inflammation. Semaglutide improved cognitive function and attenuated inflammation induced by a HFD diet. The abundance of gut microbiota was significantly changed in the HFD group, including decreased Akkermansia, Muribaculaceae, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG_002, Clostridia_UCG_014 and increased Romboutsia, Dubosiella, Enterorhabdus. Whereas semaglutide could dramatically reverse the relative abundance of these gut microbiota. Correlation analysis suggested that cognitive function was positively correlated with Muribaculaceae and Clostridia_UCG_014, and negatively associated with Romboutsia and Dubosiella. Romboutsia was positively correlated with TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β. While Clostridia_UCG_014 was negatively related to TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1β. For the first time semaglutide displayed different regulatory effects on HFD-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis. Semaglutide could regulate the structure and composition of gut microbiota associated with cognitive function and inflammation. Thus, affecting gut microbiota might be a potential mechanism of semaglutide in attenuating cognitive function and inflammation.

SELECT: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in obese patients with cardiovascular disease in the absence of diabetes.

Obesity is a global epidemic affecting 2.5 billion people and is recognized as the fourth leading cause of global mortality. Obesity is characterized by excessive accumulation of body fat and is associated with a range of health consequences, including an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been proven to reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes. Study and results: The SELECT trial was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven superiority trial, conducted at 804 clinical sites in 41 countries. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg or placebo. The primary cardiovascular efficacy endpoint was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, assessed in a time-to-first-event analysis. A total of 17,604 patients were recruited, with a mean age of 61.6 years and 72.3% males. The mean duration of exposure to semaglutide or placebo in the overall trial population was 34.2±13.7 months. The primary CVD endpoint occurred in 6.5% (n=569) of the semaglutide group and 8% (n=701) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.90; P<0.001). There was also a significant reduction of 9.39% in body weight among the patients taking semaglutide over 104 weeks after randomization versus 0.88% among the placebo group. Semaglutide reduces the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke in obese and overweight non-diabetic patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease.

Effect of New Antidiabetics on Steatosis in Nerve Tissues and Nerve Conduction Velocity: Possible Role of Nerve Growth Factor (NGF)/Synaptophysin and Nrf2/HO-1 Pathways.

The current study aims to investigate the impact of the GLP1 analog (semaglutide) and SGLT2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin) on nerve functions, morphology, and the underlying mechanisms involving nerve growth factor (NGF)/synaptophysin and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways in obese rats. Forty male Sprague Dawley rats, aged six to eight weeks, were classified into five groups; normal group (high-fat diet {HFD} for 12 weeks, metformin group (HFD for 12 weeks + metformin in last four weeks), dapagliflozin group (HFD for 12 weeks +dapagliflozin in last four weeks, semaglutide group (HFD for 12 weeks + semaglutide in last four weeks). At the end of the experiment, the sciatic nerve was collected for nerve conduction study, oxidative stress marker (malondialdehyde, i.e., MDA), real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) study (for HO-1 and Nrf2), oil red O staining, electron microscopic examination and immunohistochemistry for NGF and synaptophysin. The HFD group showed a significant rise in blood glucose, serum lipids, homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index, lipid deposition in nerve tissues, and lipid peroxidation (MDA) in nerve tissues with significant attenuation in nerve conduction velocity (NCV), the expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 genes and significant attenuation in area stained with NGF and synaptophysin. On the other hand, pretreatment with either dapagliflozin or semaglutide led to considerable enhancement in the deteriorated serum and nerve tissue parameters and reversed the pathological changes. New antidiabetic drugs like SGLT2 inhibitors (more powerful) and GLP1 analog might have neuroprotective beneficial effects besides controlling the glycemic state in obese rats. This effect may result from reduced oxidative stress and increased Nrf2 levels, HO-1, synaptophysin, and NGF in the nerve tissues of obese rats.

New Insights on Using Oral Semaglutide versus Dapagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

Increases in both the prevalence and severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity are closely related. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) has been associated with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved for the treatment of T2DM and has an important role in weight loss. Also, it may represent a new therapeutic option for the treatment of MASH in obese diabetic patients. The main outcomes were changes from baseline in liver steatosis and fibrosis at week 24. A total of one hundred eighty-seven patients with T2DM were eligible for this prospective study; ninety-five subjects were treated with oral semaglutide, and ninety-two patients were treated with dapagliflozin as an add-on to metformin. All the subjects were evaluated using Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) from June to December 2022. From our cohort, 54% of the patients were females, with a mean age of 59.92 ± 11.89 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.53 ± 5.33 kg/m2. Following a six-month medication period, we observed a substantial reduction in anthropometric measurements, including the BMI, waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WtHr), in both groups. Regarding HbA1c, a notable decrease was observed in the semaglutide group (p < 0.001) when compared to the dapagliflozin group (p = 0.011). In addition, the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) according to VCTE improved significantly in the semaglutide group participants from 8.07 ± 2.90 kPa at baseline to 6.51 ± 3.09 kPa after medication (p < 0.001). The superior metabolic effects of semaglutide, correlated to dapagliflozin, may contribute to a more efficient decrease in hepatic stress and injury, leading to a substantial enhancement of liver function in T2DM patients. Further investigations conducted over an ideal timeframe are necessary to confirm the evidence presented in this study.

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide on weight loss in patients with overweight or obesity without diabetes mellitus-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Semaglutide is found to be efficient for weight loss in patients with overweight or obesity with diabetes mellitus (DM). With a wide range of adverse events reported, the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in individuals without DM, with overweight or obesity, is unclear. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized studies on once-weekly semaglutide in this patient population. We identified nine studies with 11,641 patients in the semaglutide group and 10,479 in the placebo group. We observed that semaglutide resulted in significant benefits, including change in body weight (%): mean difference (MD) of -11.49% (p < 0.0001), change in absolute body weight: MD of -11.74 kg (p < 0.0001), and change in waist circumference: MD of -9.06 cm (p < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal side effects are predominant including nausea: odds ratio (OR) of 4.06 (p < 0.0001), vomiting: OR of 4.43 (p < 0.0001), diarrhea: OR of 2.10 (p < 0.0001), constipation: OR of 2.43 (p < 0.0001), gallbladder disorders: OR of 1.26 (p = 0.010), and cholelithiasis: OR of 2.06 (p = 0.04). Serious adverse events were not statistically significant: OR of 1.06 (p = 0.82). However, the percentage of participants discontinuing due to adverse events and gastrointestinal side effects was statistically significant: ORs of 2.22 (p < 0.0001) and 3.77 (p < 0.0001), respectively. This study shows that in patients with overweight or obesity without DM, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide can significantly decrease body weight without risk of serious adverse events when compared with a placebo. However, gastrointestinal side effects are predominant with semaglutide, which can result in medication discontinuation.

Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BackgroundPatients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease are at high risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and death. Whether treatment with semaglutide would mitigate these risks is unknown.MethodsWe randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 50 to 75 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams] of >300 and <5000 or an eGFR of 25 to <50 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >100 and <5000) to receive subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 1.0 mg weekly or placebo. The primary outcome was major kidney disease events, a composite of the onset of kidney failure (dialysis, transplantation, or an eGFR of <15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), at least a 50% reduction in the eGFR from baseline, or death from kidney-related or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified confirmatory secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically.ResultsAmong the 3533 participants who underwent randomization (1767 in the semaglutide group and 1766 in the placebo group), median follow-up was 3.4 years, after early trial cessation was recommended at a prespecified interim analysis. The risk of a primary-outcome event was 24% lower in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (331 vs. 410 first events; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.88; P=0.0003). Results were similar for a composite of the kidney-specific components of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.94) and for death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.89). The results for all confirmatory secondary outcomes favored semaglutide: the mean annual eGFR slope was less steep (indicating a slower decrease) by 1.16 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in the semaglutide group (P<0.001), the risk of major cardiovascular events 18% lower (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98; P=0.029), and the risk of death from any cause 20% lower (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95, P=0.01). Serious adverse events were reported in a lower percentage of participants in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (49.6% vs. 53.8%).ConclusionsSemaglutide reduced the risk of clinically important kidney outcomes and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; FLOW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03819153.)

Semaglutide and diuretic use in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials.

In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from -8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10.3, -6.3] to -6.9% [95% CI -9.1, -4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P = .39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P = .042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P = .24-.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P < .0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P < .001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.