Self-reported Health Literacy Research Articles

여성 결혼이민자 대상 건강문해력 향상용 특수 한국어교육 과정 설계 및 운영에 관한 연구

This study examines the design and operation of special Korean language program to promote health literacy during the Korean language education course for female marriage immigrants at the N-si Family Center in Korea. And the purpose is to suggest ways to improve the program based on the results of pilot operation and pre- and post-evaluation. 'Special Korean language program related to health' is based on a demand survey conducted by Cho, Hajin and Kim, Charmyee (2023) and is designed to fit the framework of the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family's Marriage Immigrant Capacity Building Support Project. To measure changes in female marriage immigrants' self-health awareness and improvement in health literacy according to the program, pre- and post-evaluation was conducted using FLI-FMI and HLAS, tools that have been verified in previous studies. As a result of statistical analysis using SPSS29, FLI-FMI showed that there was a significant change in the difference and improvement in health literacy of female marriage immigrants in the 12th session of the curriculum, but HLAS showed that the education did not affect the learner's self-reported health literacy so it does not appear to have had a significant impact on changing perceptions. However, when comprehensively considering the number of participants and the content of the satisfaction survey, it is difficult to be certain of the effectiveness of learning based on simple statistical figures or to determine that there has been no change in learners' self-perception of health literacy. As a follow-up study, it will be necessary to supplement areas that are difficult to uncover through quantitative research alone through qualitative research using methods such as in-depth interviews or FGI. This study is meaningful in that it presents a practical curriculum to improve immigrants' health rights and health literacy and verifies its effectiveness, but it has the limitation that it is difficult to generalize the content. We hope that by using this study as basic research, various studies on improving health literacy will be conducted.

Role of patient characteristics in adherence to first-line treatment guidelines in breast, lung and prostate cancer: insights from the Nordic healthcare system

ObjectivesThis study investigates the influence of socioeconomic status, health literacy, and numeracy on treatment decisions and the occurrence of adverse events in patients with breast, lung, and prostate cancer within...

Validating Measurement of Health Literacy among Adolescents Questionnaire (MOHLAA-Q) for Malaysian Version (MyMOHLAA-Q)

It has been determined that health literacy (HL) plays a significant factor in health and becomes an essential element in health promotion. Most HL instruments are designed for adults, whereas only a few are developed for adolescents. Thus, utilizing the existing validated instruments to assess HL is essential for success in promoting HL from the early stages of life. The Measurement of Health Literacy Among Adolescents Questionnaire (MOHLAA-Q) was developed in Germany to assess self-reported general health literacy among adolescents. This study aims to validate health literacy using MOHLAA-Q, thus establishing it as the Malaysian version of MOHLAA-Q (MyMOHLAA-Q). Face validity and content validity were done on 29 items of MOHLAA-Q. MOHLAA-Q is divided into 4 sections − A) Information about Health, B) Communication about Health, C) Attitudes towards Health and 4) Knowledge about Topic Related to Health. During the pilot testing, MOHLAA-Q administration took ∼15 minutes of 229 respondents from rural and urban areas. The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s) for scales A−C ranged from 0.61 to 0.81. The final validated questionnaire is validated for 13 to 17-year-old Malay and English-speaking adolescents. The MyMOHLAA-Q experience allowed researchers to validate a measurement tool that can be used to assess health literacy among Malaysian adolescents.

Subjective health status and health literacy of African refugees and asylum seekers in Germany: a cross-sectional survey

PurposeMany refugees and asylum seekers in Germany experience a high disease burden and low health literacy. The current study aims to focus on assessing these issues among African refugees and asylum seekers in Bavaria, Germany. The authors evaluated their self-perceived health status and health literacy, and identified barriers and gaps in health care utilization, intending to improve health care services for this group.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study involving 69 refugees and asylum seekers from Ethiopia, Eritrea and Nigeria. The authors performed descriptive and exploratory statistical analyses.FindingsThe authors found a substantial disease burden in the early stages of resettlement in Germany, particularly mental health symptoms (53.6%) and musculoskeletal problems (47.8%). Challenges in health literacy were observed, such as difficulties in understanding health information and managing emergency situations. Access to interpreters was limited, and understanding treatment certificates was more challenging than using electronic health cards, with 18.2% of participants reporting denial of medical treatment.Practical implicationsThese findings highlight the need for early and tailored health support for refugees, with a particular focus on mental health. Efforts should be made to reduce language barriers and improve navigational skills within the health-care system, particularly in emergency situations. Addressing the restricted access to health care and bureaucratic obstacles is crucial for improved health outcomes among refugees.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is the first to specifically explore the self-reported health status and health literacy of African refugees and asylum seekers in Bavaria, Germany, providing valuable insights into the unique healthcare challenges of this often underrepresented and overlooked population.

Screening for health literacy, social determinants, and discrimination in health plans.

Health inequities are frequently driven by social determinants of health (SDOH) and structural determinants of health. Our pilot sought to test the feasibility of screening for health literacy (HL) and perceived health care discrimination (PHD) through a live telephonic-facilitated survey experience with managed care patients. Cross-sectional study. Newly enrolled Medicare Advantage patients were screened for self-reported PHD, HL, and multiple SDOH using validated screening tools. Response rates for both HL and PHD screens were analyzed. A χ2 test for association between response to PHD screen and patient race was conducted. A weighted logistic regression model was used to understand how HL is associated with SDOH and demographic factors (age, gender, race/ethnicity, andincome). HL and PHD screening questions have different levels of feasibility. Administering the HL screen did not present a challenge, and patients felt comfortable responding to it. On the other hand, the PHD question had a lower response rate among patients, and some concierge advocates felt uncomfortable asking patients the question. Based on the self-reported HL data collected, low/limited HL is associated with patients who were Black, were low income, reported loneliness or isolation, or reported food insecurity. It is important to note that the study's findings are limited by the small sample size and that study results do not imply causality. It is feasible to collect self-reported HL data through a live telephonic format at the time of patient enrollment into a health plan. Health plans can leverage such screenings to better understand patient barriers for health equity-oriented interventions.

An investigation of mHealth and digital health literacy among new parents during COVID-19

IntroductionEspecially during the COVID-19 pandemic, parents were expected to understand increasingly sophisticated information about health issues and healthcare systems and access online resources as a part of their caregiving role. Yet little is known about parents' online digital technology use and digital health literacy skill. This study aimed to investigate parents' digital technology use, their self-reported digital health literacy skill, and demographic information as potential factors influencing their use of digital technologies.MethodsAn online survey utilizing convenience sampling was administered to new parents during the COVID-19 pandemic that inquired about their demographic information, digital technology use, and digital health literacy skills within Ontario, Canada.ResultsA total of 151 individuals responded to the survey; these were primarily mothers (80%) who self-reported as white (72%), well-educated 86%), heterosexual (86%) females (85%) with incomes over $100,00 per year (48%). Participants reported consistent and persistent online activity related to their parenting role and mostly via mobile smartphone devices (92%). Participants had moderate to high digital health literacy skills, greater than the Canadian national average. Almost half of participants reported negative health and well-being consequences from their digital online behaviours. There were no significant relationships between technology use, digital health literacy skill, and demographic variables.DiscussionThe COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the need for and importance of effective and equitable digital health services. Important opportunities exist within clinical practice and among parenting groups to proactively address the physical and mental health implications of digital parenting practices. Equally important are opportunities to insert into clinical workflow the inquiry into parents' online information-seeking behaviours, and to include digital health literacy as part of prenatal/postnatal health education initiatives.

Self-perceived and calculated health literacy score in long-term unemployed people

Abstract Introduction Recent studies show that low levels of health literacy are widespread in Germany, especially among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups such as long-term unemployed individuals. At the same time, it is unclear to what extent commonly used health literacy tools are tailored to the needs and literacy skills of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Therefore, we examined to what extent self-perceived and calculated health literacy scores of long-term unemployed people in Germany correlate. Methods We conducted 171 semi-structured interviews between November 2022 and February 2023 with long-term unemployed people in 11 occupational reintegration settings in Bremen, Germany. Health literacy was measured by the HLS-EU-Q16 (self-report health literacy score) and the Newest Vital Sign (calculated health literacy score). Descriptive and correlation analyses were performed with R. Results According to HLS-EU-Q16, 37% of the 171 participants (male=112, female=59) had sufficient health literacy, according to NVS only 29%. An inadequate health literacy score was shown by 19% according to HLS-EU-Q16, and by 48% according to NVS. The applied tools did not show a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.105, p = 0.17). Conclusions Self-reported health literacy data (e.g., measured by the HLS-EU-Q16) could underestimate deficits in health literacy and may be insufficient as a sole assessment tool to determine health literacy among low-literate populations as long-term unemployed people. Key messages • Various tools exist to measure health literacy. Not all measures might be suitable for all population groups. Literate skills should be considered while applying different health literacy measures. • More health literacy data on low-literate populations is needed in the literature. Health literacy tools applied in these population groups should be short and easy to understand.

Interest in using patient portals among adolescents in mental health care - a cross-sectional study

IntroductionAdolescents in mental health care may benefit from using patient portals to access personalised information about their health and treatment. While no studies have considered the interest in using patient portals among adolescents in mental health care, factors such as patient activation, self-reported health, depressive symptoms, diagnosis, healthcare utilisation, and eHealth literacy have been found to be associated with interest in and use of patient portals in other patient groups. Therefore, the aim was to explore the associations between interest in using patient portals and patient activation, self-reported health, depressive symptoms, diagnosis, healthcare utilisation and eHealth literacy among adolescents in specialist mental health care.MethodsA cross-sectional study among adolescents between 12 and 18 years of age receiving or having received treatment at four different specialist child and adolescent mental healthcare services across Norway. The adolescents´ answers to the questionnaire were linked to data on their healthcare utilisation and ICD-10 diagnoses from the Norwegian Patient Registry. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and bivariate tests.ResultsThe 53 adolescents who participated, had a mean age of 15 years and 68% of them identified as female. Two out of three (64%) were interested in using patient portals. Most of the factors were not associated with interest in using patient portals. However, adolescents with mental and behavioural disorders (F diagnoses, 75% interested) were more interested in using patient portals compared to those with symptoms and signs involving cognition, perception, emotional state, and behaviour (R diagnoses, 31% interested).ConclusionExcept for mental health diagnosis, this study did not identify any specific factors likely to impact patient portal interest among adolescents in specialist mental health care.

Trust in and Use of COVID-19 Information Sources Differs by Health Literacy among College Students.

People's health information-seeking behaviors differ by their health literacy levels. This study assessed the relationship between health literacy and college students' levels of trust in and use of a range of health information sources of COVID-19. We collected data from August to December 2020 among college students (n = 763) through an online survey. We used a health literacy measure containing three self-reported survey questions, developed by the CDC. We assessed the extent to which participants trusted and used any of the sixteen different sources of information about COVID-19. Respondents reported high levels of trusting and using COVID-19 information from the CDC, health care providers, the WHO, state/county/city health departments, and official government websites when compared to other sources. After controlling for demographic characteristics (i.e., gender, age, race, ethnicity, and income), those who reported having lower health literacy were significantly less likely to trust and use COVID-19 information from these health authorities when compared to participants who reported having higher health literacy. Students with lower self-reported health literacy indicated not trusting or using official health authority sources for COVID-19 information. Relying on low-quality information sources could create and reinforce people's misperceptions regarding the virus, leading to low compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures and poor health outcomes.

Comparing asthma control assessment using the Asthma Control Test and the Asthma APGAR in African American/Black and Hispanic/Latinx populations

Introduction The objective of this analysis was to compare the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Asthma APGAR asthma control assessment tools in African-Ancestry/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) adults with moderate to severe asthma. Methods This pre-planned sub-study of the PREPARE clinical trial compares the baseline ACT and Asthma APGAR scores for the PREPARE populations using correlation coefficients, generalized linear modeling and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. Correlations were also assessed for both control tests and the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI). Results Among the 1201 adults (603 AA/B and 598 H/L) with moderate to severe asthma, most had uncontrolled asthma by both the ACT and the Asthma APGAR. Correlation coefficients between the ACT, Asthma APGAR and ASUI were strong and did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity. The ACT consistently assessed more patients as uncontrolled compared with the Asthma APGAR. The differences in ACT and Asthma APGAR scores did not differ by age, gender, race/ethnicity, self-reported health literacy or medication adherence but did differ by education level. Both the ACT and Asthma APGAR had similar ROCs for predicting an asthma exacerbation in the next 3 months. Conclusions Both the ACT and the Asthma APGAR can be used for asthma control assessment in AA/B and H/L populations with moderate to severe asthma, providing comparable rates of uncontrolled asthma and similar limited ability to predict exacerbations. Further work is required to better understand the basis and clinical implications of the higher rates of uncontrolled asthma identified using the ACT.

Exploring Older Adult Health Literacy in the Day-to-Day Management of Polypharmacy and Making Decisions About Deprescribing: A Mixed Methods Study.

Polypharmacy use in older adults is increasing and sometimes leads to poor health outcomes. The influence of health literacy in managing polypharmacy and making decisions about stopping medication has received limited attention. A mixed methods design was used to measure and investigate the influence of health literacy in the management of polypharmacy and decisions about deprescribing. Phase 1 involved two cross-sectional surveys, one with older adults using five or more medications and the other with general practitioners (GPs). Older adult health literacy was measured using the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale. Phase 2 employed individual interviews with both older adults and GPs and further explored the reported use of health literacy in practice. SPSS version 24 was used to conduct descriptive statistical analysis of the Phase 1 survey responses and Phase 2 interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis with the assistance of NVivo 12. Phase 1 survey responses were received from 85 GPs and 137 older adults. Phase 2 interviews were conducted with 16 GPs and 25 older adults. Phase 1 results indicated that self-reported older adult health literacy was high, and that GPs believed older patients could engage in decisions about deprescribing. Phase 2 findings showed that older adults developed and employed complex health literacy practices to manage medications between consultations; however, few reported using their health literacy skills in consultations with their GPs. GPs noted that older adult involvement in decision-making varied and generally thought that older adults had low health literacy. Older adults reported using health literacy practices in the management of their sometimes-complex medication regimens. However, the role of health literacy in deprescribing decision-making was limited. The mixed methods approach allowed greater insight into older adult and GP practices that influence the acquisition and use of health literacy. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(1):e14-e25.] Plain Language Summary: This report explores health literacy in the use of multiple medications and decisions to stop using medication/s in older age. Older adults reported good heath literacy and practiced many health literacy skills in the management of their medications. However, they did not always report the use of their health literacy skills when discussing their medications with their family doctor.

Reliability of self-reported health literacy screening in spine patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLimited health literacy has previously been associated with increased health care utilization, worse general health status and self-reported health, and increased mortality. Identifying and accommodating patients with limited health literacy may offer an avenue towards mitigating adverse health outcomes and reduce unnecessary health care expenditure. Due to the challenges associated with implementation of lengthy health literacy assessments, the Brief Health Literacy Screening Instrument was developed. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports on the accuracy of this screening questionnaire, with or without the inclusion of sociodemographic characteristics, when predicting limited health literacy in orthopaedic spine patients. PURPOSETo evaluate the reliability and predictive accuracy of self-reported health literacy screening questions with and without the inclusion of sociodemographic variables in orthopaedic spine patients. STUDY DESIGNCross-sectional. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital-based multi-surgeon spine center OUTCOME MEASURESBrief Health Literacy Screening Instrument (BRIEF), and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool. METHODSBetween December 2021 and February 2022, consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 presenting as new patients to an urban, hospital-based outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation. A sociodemographic survey, the BRIEF, and the NVS Health Literacy Assessment Tool were administered verbally. Simple and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the accuracy of each BRIEF question individually, and collectively, at predicting limited health literacy as defined by the NVS. Further regression analysis included sociodemographic variables (age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, highest educational degree, employment status, marital status, annual household income, insurance status, and self-reported health. RESULTSA total of 262 patients [mean age (years), 57 ± 17] were included in this study. One hundred thirty-four (51%) were male, 223 (85%) were White, and 151 (58%) were married. Patient BRIEF scores were as follows: 23 (9%) limited, 43 (16%) marginal, and 196 (75%) adequate. NVS scores identified 87 (33%) patients with possible limited health literacy. BRIEF items collectively demonstrated fair accuracy in the prediction of limited health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70−0.82). Individually, the fourth BRIEF item (“How confident are you in filling out medical forms by yourself?”) was the best predictor of limited health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60−0.73). The predictive accuracy of the BRIEF items, both individually and collectively, increased with the inclusion of sociodemographic variables within the logistic regression. Specific characteristics independently associated with limited health literacy were self-identified Black race, retired or disabled employment status, single or divorced marital status, high school education or below, and self-reported “poor” health. CONCLUSIONSLimited health literacy has implications for patient outcomes and health care costs. Our results show that the BRIEF questionnaire is a low-cost screening tool that demonstrates fair predictability in determining limited health literacy within a population of spine patients. Self-reported health literacy assessments may be more feasible in daily practice and easier to implement into clinical workflow.

Does health literacy predict cardiometabolic marker trajectories among people with diabetes? A longitudinal mixed-effect analysis

AimsTo assess trajectories in cardiometabolic markers among people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with varying health literacy levels. MethodsSurvey data assessing self-reported health literacy among 1401 people with type 1 diabetes and 910 people with type 2 diabetes were linked to prospective clinical data. Mixed effects modelling was used to identify the impact of three health literacy domains on trajectories of systolic blood pressure (SBP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). ResultsHigh health literacy scores in some domains were associated with attenuated HbA1c trajectories, while associations with LDL-C and SBP were weak or absent, particularly among participants with type 2 diabetes. The domain “Ability to Actively Manage Health” had the strongest association with HbA1c (P < 0.001). Exponential changes over time were not observed. Differences in the estimated progression of cardiometabolic markers by health literacy levels did not reach statistical significance. ConclusionLow health literacy was associated with suboptimal glycaemic levels in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. There was inconclusive evidence of associations between health literacy, BP, and LDL-C. Development in cardiometabolic markers did not indicate faster diabetes progression among people with low health literacy.

HL-Kids-NRW – Study of fourth-graders’ health literacy

Abstract Background Although children are identified as a key target group for interventions targeting the development of health literacy, little data is available on children's health literacy and how it is related to health outcomes at a young age. This study addresses this research gap by providing data on fourth-graders’ health literacy and associated health outcomes. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among fourth-grade students in the state of North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany. The study was designed as a representative survey starting in 12/2020, which could, however, not be realized due to pandemic-related constraints. Data collected between 07/20 and 11/20 is included in the analyses presented here. Among others, we assessed self-reported health literacy with the HLS-Child-Q15 questionnaire, while also assessing various self-reported health outcomes. Results n = 364 students are included in the analysis, 49,5% of which are female. The mean age is 9.5 years (SD=.7). The HLS-Child-Q15 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=.812). Self-reported health literacy is high, with a HLS-Child-Q15 mean score of 3.13, indicating that it is rather easy for participants to deal with health-related information. Health literacy is significantly associated with a number of outcomes related to health status (KINDL-R subscales physical wellbeing and mental wellbeing, Spearman's ρ = .280 and ρ = .271, respectively; p &amp;lt; .001) and health behaviour (freq. of brushing teeth: ρ = .173; p &amp;lt; .01; freq. of eating fruit and vegetable: ρ = .217 and ρ = .299; p &amp;lt; .001; freq. of physical activity: ρ = .279; p &amp;lt; .001). Conclusions While the overall level of health literacy in our sample is high, higher health literacy is associated with better health behaviours, as well as improved mental and physical wellbeing. Further analyses are necessary to explore the causal pathways between the investigated variables, and representative survey are needed to verify these findings.

Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Health Behaviours and the Literacy of Future Healthcare Professionals.

Our everyday behaviours in life can positively and negatively impact our health, thus cumulatively shaping our lifestyles as more or less healthy. These behaviours are often determined by our knowledge, literacy, motivations and socioeconomic backgrounds. The authors aimed to assess health behaviours and explore variables that may affect persons studying to become future healthcare professionals in Poland. This study was conducted with a group of 275 undergraduate students attending the Poznan University of Medical Sciences representing six different majors of study. We used self-reported, cross-sectional survey conducted through the use of a questionnaire that consisted of one standardised scale (Juczyński’s Health Behaviour Inventory) as well as a self-developed health literacy measure. The students showed average to high levels of health-promoting behaviours (mean HBI = 82.04 ± 11.26). Medium to strong associations were found between these behaviours and high scores on the health literacy scale (p = 0.001, r = 0.45 between total scores of the two scales). Dietetics students and female respondents scored significantly better on both scales, which suggests that their self-reported behaviours and health literacy were higher than those of other participants. Exhibiting health-protective behaviours and high health literacy is likely to result in the better individual health of our respondents, but, more importantly, will also influence their future professions. As members of the healthcare workforce they will be responsible for the health of the population and it is crucial for them not only to provide care, education, and guidance, but also to act as role-models for their patients and society.

Adolescents’ self-efficacy and digital health literacy: a cross-sectional mixed methods study

BackgroundThe internet and social media are increasingly popular sources of health information for adolescents. Using online health information requires digital health literacy, consisting of literacy, analytical skills and personal capabilities such as self-efficacy. Appraising trustworthiness and relevance of online health information requires critical health literacy to discriminate between sources, critically analyse meaning and relevance, and use information for personal health. Adolescents with poor digital health literacy risk using misinformation, with potential negative health outcomes. We aimed to understand adolescents’ contemporary digital health literacy and compared self-efficacy with capability.MethodsAdolescents (12–17 years) completed an eHEALS self-report digital health literacy measure, a practical search task using a think-aloud protocol and an interview to capture perceived and actual digital health literacy. eHEALS scores were generated using descriptive statistics, search tasks were analysed using an observation checklist and interviews were thematically analysed based on Social Cognitive Theory, focussing on self-efficacy.ResultsTwenty-one participants generally had high self-efficacy using online health information but perceived their digital health literacy to be higher than demonstrated. They accessed online health information unintentionally on social media and intentionally via search engines. They appraised information medium, source and content using general internet searching heuristics taught at school. Information on social media was considered less trustworthy than websites, but participants used similar appraisal strategies for both; some search/appraisal heuristics were insufficiently nuanced for digital health information, sometimes resulting in misplaced trust or diminished self-efficacy. Participants felt anxious or relieved after finding online health information, depending on content, understanding and satisfaction. They did not act on information without parental and/or health professional advice. They rarely discussed findings with health professionals but would welcome discussions and learning how to find and appraise online health information.ConclusionsWhilst adolescents possess many important digital health literacy skills and generally feel self-efficacious in using them, their critical health literacy needs improving. Adolescents desire increased digital health literacy so they can confidently appraise health information they find online and on social media. Co-designed educational interventions with adolescents and health providers are required.

The Dispersion of Health Information-Seeking Behavior and Health Literacy in a State in the Southern United States: Cross-sectional Study.

BackgroundThe transmission of health information from in-person communication to web-based sources has changed over time. Patients can find, understand, and use their health information without meeting a health care provider and are able to participate more in their health care management. In recent years, the internet has emerged as the primary source of health information, although clinical providers remain the most credible source. The ease of access, anonymity, and busy schedules may be motivating factors to seek health information on the web. Social media has surfaced as a popular source of health information, as it can provide news in real time. The increase in the breadth and depth of health information available on the web has also led to a plethora of misinformation, and individuals are often unable to discern facts from fiction. Competencies in health literacy (HL) can help individuals better understand health information and enhance patient decision-making, as adequate HL is a precursor to positive health information–seeking behaviors (HISBs). Several factors such as age, sex, and socioeconomic status are known to moderate the association between HL and HISBs.ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between HL and HISBs in individuals living in a southern state in the United States by considering different demographic factors.MethodsParticipants aged ≥18 years were recruited using Qualtrics Research Services and stratified to match the statewide demographic characteristics of race and age. Demographics and source and frequency of health information were collected. The Health Literacy Questionnaire was used to collect self-reported HL experiences. SPSS (version 27; IBM Corp) was used for the analysis.ResultsA total of 520 participants met the criteria and completed the survey (mean age 36.3, SD 12.79 years). The internet was cited as the most used source of health information (mean 2.41, SD 0.93). Females are more likely to seek health information from physicians than males (r=0.121; P=.006). Older individuals are less likely to seek health information from the internet (r=−0.108; P=.02), social media (r=−0.225; P<.001), and friends (r=−0.090; P=.045) than younger individuals. Cluster analysis demonstrated that individuals with higher levels of HISBs were more likely to seek information from multiple sources than those with lower levels of HISBs (mean range 3.05-4.09, SD range 0.57-0.66; P<.001).ConclusionsAge and sex are significantly associated with HISB. Older adults may benefit from web-based resources to monitor their health conditions. Higher levels of HL are significantly associated with greater HISB. Targeted strategies to improve HISB among individuals with lower levels of HL may improve their access, understanding, and use of health information.

Modelling variance in the multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire: Does a General Health Literacy factor account for observed interscale correlations?

Objectives:Self-report measures of health literacy frequently encompass a group of conceptually distinct but related domains scored as either a single scale or separately for each domain. Psychometric studies of the 44-item Health Literacy Questionnaire, scored as nine separate scales, typically report the results of correlated factors confirmatory factor analyses as validity evidence. However, some scales are quite strongly correlated, raising the question of whether there is sufficient discriminant validity to warrant separate scoring. This psychometric study aims to contrast the results of fitting higher-order and bifactor models as alternative options to illuminate the issue.Methods:Correlated factors, higher-order and bifactor confirmatory factor analysis models were fitted to an Australian sample of responses to the Health Literacy Questionnaire (N = 813) using Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis methods.Results:All models representing a nine-factor structure for the Health Literacy Questionnaire fitted well. The correlated factors model replicated previous findings, showing inter-factor correlations between 0.19 and 0.93. A higher-order model showed relatively high loadings of all nine first-order factors on the second-order factor with particularly high loadings (⩾0.97) for three. Two bifactor models showed that the majority of Health Literacy Questionnaire items were multifactorial, each containing systematic variance from both a General Health Literacy factor and a domain-specific factor. Seven items from four scales were identified as strongly associated with the General Health Literacy factor, with item content suggesting that this factor indexes a broad sense of agency and efficacy in interacting with health-related information and healthcare providers.Conclusion:Contrasting correlated factors, higher-order and bifactor models fitted to the Health Literacy Questionnaire suggest that constituent items in self-report health literacy questionnaires might be anticipated to represent at least two sources of reliable and substantive common factor variance: variance associated with General Health Literacy and variance associated with a more specific domain, suggesting that items may be ‘irreducibly’ heterogeneous. Implications for test development and validation practice are discussed.

Self-reported health literacy and medication adherence in older adults: a systematic review

ObjectivesTo give an overview over the associations between self-reported health literacy and medication adherence in older adults.DesignA systematic literature review of quantitative studies published in English and German.Data sourcesMEDLINE via...

Health Literacy in Surgical Oncology Patients: An Observational Study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Low health literacy is associated with increased resource use and poorer outcomes in medical and surgical patients with various diseases. This observational study was designed to determine (1) the prevalence of low health literacy among surgical patients with cancer at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC), and (2) associations between health literacy and clinical outcomes. Patients receiving surgery (N=218) for gastrointestinal (60%) or genitourinary cancers (22%) or sarcomas (18%) were recruited during their postsurgical hospitalization. Patients self-reported health literacy using the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF). Clinical data (length of stay [LoS], postacute care needs, and unplanned presentation for care within 30 days) were abstracted from the electronic medical records 90 days after surgery. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to examine the relationship between health literacy and clinical outcomes, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Of 218 participants, 31 (14%) showed low health literacy (BRIEF score ≤12). In regression analyses including 212 patients with complete data, low health literacy significantly predicted LoS (β = -1.82; 95% CI, -3.00 to -0.66; P=.002) and postacute care needs (odds ratio [OR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.91). However, health literacy was not significantly associated with unplanned presentation for care in the 30 days after surgery (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.20-1.29). This study demonstrates the prevalence of low health literacy in a surgical cancer population at a high-volume NCI-designated CCC and its association with important clinical outcomes, including hospital LoS and postacute care needs. Universal screening and patient navigation may be 2 approaches to mitigate the impact of low health literacy on postsurgical outcomes.