Self-expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve Research Articles

Clinical impact of multiple resheathing during transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Evolut self-expanding valves

BackgroundThe possibility to resheath some transcatheter heart valves (THV) facilitates the optimization of self-expandable devices implantation. However, resheating manoeuvres (expecially when repeated) increase the interaction between the transcatheter prosthesis and the patient's tissues potentially causing side-effects. AimsTo assess the clinical outcomes of resheathing at midterm follow-up with a focus on the safety of multiple resheathing. MethodsThis retrospective observational study included all consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with a self-expandable supra-annular THV between December 2018 and December 2022. Primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, neurological events, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and CV rehospitalizations. All clinical endpoints were assessed according to VARC-3 criteria. Results469 TAVI procedures with self-expandable supra-annular THV were included in the study. The attempt to resheath and the resheath manoeuvres number was prospectively recorded into an electronic database. Resheating was attempted in 253 (53.9%) cases; 1, 2 and ≥ 3 resheathing were performed in respectively 122 (26.0%), 63 (13.4%) and 68 (14.5%) procedures. At a median follow-up of 640 days (interquartile range 340–1033 days), the incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ between 0 vs. ≥1 (22.7 vs. 26.1%, LogRank p = 0.584) and < 3 vs. ≥3 resheathing groups (24.2 vs. 26.5% LogRank p = 0.963). Furthermore, no significant differences in the primary endpoint were observed between 0, 1–2 and ≥ 3 resheathing (p = 0.84). ConclusionsOur study found that resheathing of self-expandable THVs during TAVI did not result in worse clinical outcomes compared with no resheathing at mid-term follow-up. These results are independent from the number of resheathing, underling the safety of multiple resheathing in terms of peri-procedural and mid-term outcome. Condensed abstractIn this retrospective observational study of 469 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis with self-expanding valves, we investigated the influence of resheathing on mid-term clinical outcomes. Specifically, we focused on the safety of multiple resheathing procedures. Our findings revealed no significant impact of resheathing on medium-term outcomes. The primary endpoint, a composite of cardiovascular mortality, neurological events, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular rehospitalizations, did not show statistically significant differences between no resheathing, single resheathing and multiple resheathing groups. Our study suggests that resheathing, even when performed multiple times, does not appear to significantly affect clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.

Size of Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve and Mid-Term Adverse Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The hemodynamic performance of self-expandable valves (SEV) is a preferable choice for small aortic annuli in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, no data are so far available regarding the relationship between the size of SEV and clinical outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the impact of prosthesis size on adverse events after TAVR using SEV. We retrospectively analyzed 1400 patients (23mm SEV: 13.6%) who underwent TAVR using SEV at 12 centers. The impact of SEV size on all-cause death and heart failure (HF) after TAVR was evaluated by multivariate Cox regression and propensity score (PS) matching analysis. During the follow-up period (median 511 days), 201 all-cause deaths and 87 HF rehospitalizations were observed. The incidence of all-cause death was comparable between small (23mm SEV) and larger-size (26 or 29mm SEV) (16.8% vs. 13.9%, log-rank P = 0.29). The size of SEV was not associated with higher incidence of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.86 in Cox regression; HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.23 in PS matching) and HF after TAVR (subdistribution-HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.72 in Cox regression; subdistribution-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.30 in PS matching). The multivariate model including post-procedural prosthesis-patient mismatch showed consistent results. In conclusion, small SEVs had comparable mid-term clinical outcomes as compared to larger-size SEVs, even if the prosthesis-patient mismatch was observed after TAVR.

Temporal trends with the Evolut family of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves: A single-center experience.

The Evolut self-expanding valve (SEV) systems (Medtronic), were designed to accommodate varying valve sizes and reduce paravalvular leak (PVL) while maintaining a low delivery profile. These systems have evolved between product generations, alongside valve deployment techniques changing over time. This study aimed to examine whether these changes impacted clinical outcomes. EPROMPT is a prospective, investigator-initiated, postmarketing registry of consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the Evolut PRO/PRO+SEV system. A total of 300 patients were divided into three consecutive cohorts of 100 patients according to implantation date (January to October 2018, November 2018 to July 2020, and August 2020 to November 2021). Procedural and clinical outcomes over these time periods were compared. Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 device implantation success improved over time (70.0% vs. 78.0% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.01), with a similar trend for VARC-3 device success (94.7% vs. 81.7% vs. 96.8%, p < 0.001). PVL (all degrees) frequency was likewise reduced over time (31.0% vs. 17.0% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.04). Furthermore, a trend was noticed toward shorter procedure times and shorter length of stay. However, postprocedural pacemaker implantation rates did not significantly differ (15.2% vs. 21.1% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.43). During a 3-year period, we demonstrated better TAVR outcomes with newer SEV iterations, alongside changes in implantation techniques, which might result in better procedural and clinical outcomes. However, we did not see a significant change in peri-procedural pacemaker rates for SEV.

Single suture-mediated closure system after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center real-world experience.

Despite the use of two crossed Perclose ProGlide™ (Abbott Vascular Devices) is the most widespread technique to close the main arterial access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI), the safest and most effective strategy still remains much debated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of a single Perclose ProGlide suture-mediated closure device to obtain femoral hemostasis after sheathless implantation of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves through their 14 F-equivalent fix delivery systems. This prospective observational study included 439 patients undergoing TF-TAVI at the "Montevergine" Clinic of Mercogliano, Italy. All patients underwent hemostasis of the large-bore access using a single Perclose ProGlide with preclose technique, after sheathless implantation of self-expanding transcatheter heart valves through 14 F-equivalent fix delivery systems. A multidetector computed tomography analysis of size, tortuosity, atherosclerotic, and calcification burdens of the ilio-femoral access route was made by a dedicated corelab. Vascular complications (VCs), percutaneous closure device (PCD) failure, and bleedings were adjudicated by a clinical events committee. A total of 81 different VCs were observed in 60 patients (13.7%); among these, 41 (5% of patients) were categorized as major. PCD failure occurred in 14 patients (3.2%). At the logistic regression analysis, no predictors of PCD failure have been identified. This registry suggests that the use of a single suture-mediated closure device could be considered a safe and efficient technique to achieve access site hemostasis in patients undergoing TF-TAVI through 14 F-equivalent fix delivery systems.

Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR Using Self-Expanding Devices With Commissural Alignment: The RE-ACCESS 2 Study

BackgroundCoronary re-engagement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (THVs) systematically implanted using commissural alignment (CA) techniques has been poorly investigated. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate unsuccessful coronary cannulation, and its predictors, after TAVR using self-expanding devices implanted using CA techniques. MethodsRE-ACCESS 2 (Reobtain Coronary Ostia Cannulation Beyond Transcatheter Aortic Valve Stent 2) was an investigator-driven, single-center, prospective study that enrolled consecutive TAVR patients receiving Evolut and ACURATE THVs implanted using CA techniques. The primary endpoint was unsuccessful coronary cannulation after TAVR. The secondary endpoint was the identification of postprocedural predictors of unfeasible, selective coronary ostia re-engagement on computed tomographic angiography performed after TAVR. ResultsAmong 127 patients enrolled from September 2021 to December 2022, 7 (5.5%) had unsuccessful coronary cannulation after TAVR, and 6 of them received Evolut THVs (7.5% vs 2.3%; P = 0.26). Failure of left coronary artery cannulation was similar between Evolut and ACURATE THVs (2.5% vs 2.1%; P = 1.00), whereas that of right coronary artery cannulation was prevalent in the Evolut group (6.3% vs 0.0%; P = 0.16). Coronary overlap was associated with the inability to selectively cannulate the right coronary artery (OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 1.2-25.8; P = 0.03), but not in ACURATE recipients (P = 0.39). Severe misalignment of Evolut THVs was associated with the inability to selectively cannulate both coronary arteries (OR: 24.7; 95% CI: 1.9-312.9; P = 0.01). ConclusionsUnsuccessful coronary cannulation after TAVR using self-expanding THVs implanted using CA techniques was reported in 5.5% of cases, with the majority involving the Evolut THV. Commissural misalignment affected coronary cannulation after TAVR mostly in Evolut recipients.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with a pre-existing prosthetic mitral valve: a single center experience with two cases

BackgroundThe performance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pre-existing prosthetic mitral valves is technically challenging due to the potential interference between both prosthetic devices. At present, there are no clear recommendations for this patient subset due to their exclusion from clinical trials. We report our experience of two cases with pre-existing prosthetic mechanical mitral valves who underwent TAVR.Case presentationThe first case was a 57 year old man with severe aortic stenosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus who had a mitral valve replacement 32 years ago. Operative mortality risk assessed by the Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS) Score was 1.7%, but he was considered high risk in view of previous cardiac surgery. Pre-procedure CT evaluation revealed favorable aortic root and femoral access anatomy with the mechanical mitral valve located 6.3 mm below the aortic annular plane. He underwent TAVR with a Medtronic Evolut R 29 mm self-expanding transcatheter heart valve via the femoral approach.The second case was a 66 year old lady who presented with severe aortic stenosis, atrial fibrillation and a history of mitral valve replacement 17 years ago for rheumatic mitral stenosis. Her STS score was 3.5%. Pre-procedure CT showed favorable aortic root and femoral access parameters with a mitral-aortic distance of 3.6 mm. TAVR was performed with a balloon expandable Myval 21.5 mm transcatheter heart valve via a transfemoral access. Both procedures were done successfully.ConclusionThis report highlights the feasibility of TAVR in post-mitral valve replacement patients provided careful pre-procedural evaluation, and planning is done.

Patient-Specific Commissural Alignment With a Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve

A simple and reproducible technique to achieve commissural alignment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Allegra valve is described. Slight rotation of the system before system insertion is necessary. Moreover, thanks to its permaflow system (Biosensors) and its radiopaque markings, small adjustments before valve deployment can be made to reassess correct alignment.

Leaflet Mechanical Stress in Different Designs and Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: An in Vitro Study

BackgroundIt is unknown whether bioprostheses used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation will have similar long-term durability as those used for surgical aortic valve replacement. Repetitive mechanical stress applied to the valve leaflets, particularly during diastole, is the main determinant of structural valve deterioration. Leaflet mechanical stress cannot be measured in vivo. The objective of this in vitro/in silico study was thus to compare the magnitude and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stress in old vs new generations of self-expanding (SE) vs balloon expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs). MethodsA double activation simulator was used for in vitro testing of two generations of SE THV (Medtronic CoreValve 26 mm and EVOLUT PRO 26 mm) and two generations of BE THV (Edwards SAPIEN 23 mm vs SAPIEN-3 23 mm). These THVs were implanted within a 21-mm aortic annulus. A noncontact system based on stereophotogammetry and digital image correlation with high spatial and temporal resolution (2000 img/sec) was used to visualize the valve leaflet motion and perform the three-dimensional analysis. A finite element model of the valve was developed, and the leaflet deformation obtained from the digital image correlation analysis was applied to the finite element model to calculate local leaflet mechanical stress during diastole. ResultsThe maximum von Mises leaflet stress was higher in early vs new THV generation (p < 0.05) and in BE vs SE THV (p < 0.05): early generation BE: 2.48 vs SE: 1.40 MPa; new generation BE: 1.68 vs SE: 1.07 MPa. For both types of THV, the highest values of leaflet stress were primarily observed in the upper leaflet edge near the commissures and to a lesser extent in the mid-portion of the leaflet body, which is the area where structural leaflet deterioration most often occurs in vivo. ConclusionsThe results of this in vitro/in silico study suggest that: i) Newer generations of THVs have ∼30% lower leaflet mechanical stress than the early generations; ii) For a given generation, SE THVs have lower leaflet mechanical stress than BE THVs. Further studies are needed to determine if these differences between new vs early THV generations and between SE vs BE THVs will translate into significant differences in long-term valve durability in vivo.

Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Type 0 Bicuspid, Type 1 Bicuspid, and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.

Data concerning the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce. The study aims to compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for AS in patients with type 0 bicuspid, type 1 bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valve anatomy. We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe AS between 2012 and 2022 in this single-center retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was mortality, while secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications such as stroke and pacemaker implantation and transcatheter heart valve hemodynamic performance. The number of patients with AS with type 0 bicuspid, type 1 bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valve anatomy was 328, 302, and 642, respectively. Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves were used in the majority of patients (n=1160; 91.4%). In the matched population, differences in mortality (30 days: 4.2% versus 1.7% versus 1.7%, Poverall=0.522; 1 year: 10% versus 2.3% versus 6.2%, Poverall=0.099) and all stroke (30 days: 1.0% versus 0.9% versus 0.0%, Poverall=0.765; 1 year: 1.4% versus 1.6% versus 1.3%, Poverall=NS) were nonsignificant, and the incidence of overall in-hospital complications was comparable among groups. Ascending aortic diameter was the single predictor of 1-year mortality in type 0 bicuspid patients (hazard ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.03-2.44]; P=0.035). The proportion of patients with a mean residual gradient ≥20 mm Hg was the highest in those with type 0 bicuspid anatomy, although the need for permanent pacemaker implantation was the lowest in this group. Major clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for AS in patients with type 0 bicuspid, type 1 bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valve anatomy are equivalent at short- and mid-term follow-up. These observations merit further exploration in prospective international registries and randomized controlled trials.

Self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves in low risk TAVR patients

BackgroundRecent randomized studies have broadened the indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to also include low-surgical-risk patients. However, the data on self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) valves in low-risk patients remain sparse. MethodsThe current study is a post hoc analysis of combined data from both LRT 1.0 and 2.0 trials comparing BE and SE transcatheter heart valves. ResultsA total of 294 patients received a BE valve, and 102 patients received an SE valve. The 30-day clinical outcomes were similar across both groups except for stroke (4.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.014) and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.8% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), which were higher in the SE cohort than the BE cohort. No difference was observed in terms of paravalvular leak (≥moderate) between the groups (0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.577). SE patients had higher aortic valve area (1.92 ± 0.43 mm2 vs. 1.69 ± 0.45 mm2, p < 0.001) and lower mean gradient (8.93 ± 3.53 mmHg vs. 13.41 ± 4.73 mmHg, p < 0.001) than BE patients. In addition, the rate of subclinical leaflet thrombosis was significantly lower in SE patients (5.6% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.038). ConclusionIn this non-randomized study assessing SE and BE valves in low-risk TAVR patients, SE valves are associated with better hemodynamics and lesser leaflet thrombosis, with increased rates of stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days; however, this could be due to certain patient-dependent factors not fully evaluated in this study. The long-term implications of these outcomes on structural valve durability remain to be further investigated. Clinical Trial RegistryLRT 1.0: NCT02628899LRT 2.0: NCT03557242

Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve Embolization Caused by Sledding Phenomenon With a Pigtail Catheter

Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve Embolization Caused by Sledding Phenomenon With a Pigtail Catheter

Impact of different in vitro models on functional performance of the self-expanding transcatheter heart valve.

Transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are investigated according to International Organization for Standardization requirements using in vitro heart simulators to evaluate hydrodynamic performance. In contrast to surgical valves, a THV's performance heavily depends on the configuration and shape of the aortic anulus. In International Organization for Standardization regulations, there is no detailed definition for the construction of a compartment in which a THV has to be tested. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to compare different in vitro models for functional testing of THVs. Porcine aortic conduits (23-mm diameter) were implanted in Dacron prostheses and calcified with double-distilled water and calcification buffer at 37°C over 83 million cycles in a Hi-Cycler (durability testing) mimicking nearly 3 patient-years. Hydrodynamic testing of Evolut PRO 26 mm was performed within 3 models (plexiglass, native conduit and calcified conduit; all 23-mm diameter) at a frequency of 64 bpm and different stroke volumes (55-105 ml). Calcified conduits showed significantly higher mean pressure gradients (MPG) and lower effective orifice areas (EOA) in comparison to native conduits (without THV; P < 0.001). EOA and MPG of Evolut PRO differed depending on the model tested. Calcified conduits resulted in the lowest EOA and highest MPG of the THV compared to plexiglass and the native conduit. Full expansion of the THV was least impaired in the native conduit, while lowest geometric orifice area, lowest minimal internal diameter and highest pin-wheeling index of Evolut PRO were seen in the calcified conduit. Full expansion and functional performance of the Evolut PRO THV depends on the configuration of the testing compartment in an in vitro setting.

Self-Expandable Prosthesis Valve Adaptation: Non-Uniform Expansion and Stent Frame Decoupling

The incidence of non-uniform expansion in the context of the self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) is little investigated, along with stent-frame decoupling, which is a form of stent adaptation, in which the lower part of the THV stent conforms to both the ellipticity of the left ventricle outflow tract and the native annulus while maintaining the higher part of the valve more circular. We analyzed post-implant multi-detector computed tomography scans in 50 patients. Prosthesis non-uniform expansion was assessed by computing the prosthesis eccentricity on 6 prespecified levels: (1) frame inflow, (2) native annulus, (3) leaflet inflow, (4) prosthesis waist, (5) leaflet outflow, and (6) frame outflow. Stent-frame decoupling was assessed by comparing the mean eccentricity on 6 different prosthesis levels. Implantation depth, leaflet expansion and alignment, and residual anatomic sinus area ratios were also calculated. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis was defined as hypoattenuated lesion of a meniscal shape. At a 12-month follow-up, non-uniform expansion was consistently detected at each valvular level. Highest eccentricity was measured at the native annulus level (eccentricity: 0.54 ± 0.12), while the lowest index at the frame outflow level (0.23 ± 0.11). Similar results were observed in the subgroup analyses of sizes 23, 26, 29, and 34. Eccentricity significantly decreased from the annulus level to the prosthesis frame outflow (p <0.001). Notably, the incidence of mild-to-severe subclinical leaflet thrombosis was relevant (16%). In conclusion, prosthesis non-uniform expansion and stent frame decoupling frequently occur after self-expandable THV replacement. The clinical and hemodynamic implications remain uncertain.

Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves Optimize Transvalvular Hemodynamics Independent of Intra- Versus Supra-Annular Design

This study sought to characterize transvalvular hemodynamics during the first 30days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) across various transcatheter heart valves (THVs), while adjusting for annular dimensions. This was an observational study of TAVIs from September 2021 to October 2022. The primary outcome was mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TVPG), measured using transthoracic echocardiography at day 0, day 1, and day 30 post-TAVI, and were compared across 3 THV, including the self-expandable intra-annular Portico (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) valve, the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 Ultra (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California), and the self-expandable supra-annular Evolut Pro+ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). A total of 560 patients who underwent TAVI were identified, of which 106 (18.9%) received a Portico THV, 176 (31.4%) received a SAPIEN THV, and 278 (49.6%) received an Evolut THV. For Portico THV, the TVPG on day 0 increased from 6.0 (4.7 to 9.0) to 7.0 (6.0 to 10.0) by day 30 (p=0.009). For SAPIEN THV, the TVPG on day 0 increased from 6.5 (5.0 to 8.0) to 12.0 (9.0 to 15.0) by day 30 (p <0.001). For Evolut THV, the TVPG on day 0 increased from 6.0 (5.0 to 9.0) to 7.2 (5.0 to 10.0) by day 30 (p=0.001). Adjusting for time and annular diameter in a multivariable mixed effects model, the SAPIEN group had a significantly greater increase in TVPG over time than the Evolut reference group (p <0.001), while there was no difference in the change of TVPG over time for the Portico group vs. the Evolut group (p=0.874). In conclusion, compared with balloon-expandable valves, self-expanding THV may optimize transvalvular hemodynamics across all annular diameters, independent of their supra-annular and intra-annular design.

Results of new-generation balloon vs. self-expandable transcatheter heart valves for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.

Data comparing new-generation self-expandable (SEV, Evolut R/PRO) vs. balloon-expandable (BEV, SAPIEN 3/3Ultra) transcatheter heart valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (BAV) is limited. Our aim was to compare 30-day results of SEV and BEV implantations in patients with BAV. A total of 2009 patients underwent TAVR between April 2015 and June 2021 at our Centre. From our institutional registry, we identified 106 consecutive patients with BAV who underwent TAVR using SEV and BEV. A 106 patients (n = 68 BEV; n = 38 SEV) were included. Mean age was 74.6 ± 8.8 years (BEV) vs.75.3 ± 8.7 years (SEV) (p = 0.670) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 2.6 ± 1.9 (BEV) vs. 2.6 ± 1.6 (SEV) (p = 0.374), respectively. Device landing zone calcium volume (DLZ-CV) was 1168 ± 811 vs. 945 ± 850 mm3 (p = 0.192). Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 device success at 30 days was similar (BEV 80.9% vs. SEV 86.8%; p = 0.433). More post-dilatations were performed in SEVs (23.5% BEV vs. 52.6% SEV; p = 0.002). Overall mean gradient at 30 days follow-up was 11.9 ± 4.6 mmHG (BEV) vs. 9.2 ± 3.0 mmHG (SEV) (p = 0.002). A mild-moderate degree of paravalvular leak (PVL) was detected more often in the SEV group (7.4% vs. 13.2%; p = 0.305). A trend towards higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was observed in SEV (11.8% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.109). Treatment of BAV revealed similar performance using BEV and SEV. In this retrospective cohort study, hemodynamics were more favorable with the SEV, although there was a trend toward more PVL and significantly more post-dilations.

Valve-in-valve procedures for degenerated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses using a latest-generation self-expanding intra-annular transcatheter heart valve.

Valve-in-valve (ViV) transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for failing aortic surgical bioprostheses or transcatheter heart valves (THV) has demonstrated a reasonable clinical and hemodynamic efficacy. Traditionally, self-expanding (SE) supra-annular THV are considered to result in superior hemodynamics compared with balloon-expandable intra-annular THV after ViV. However, so far no data are found on latest-generation intra-annular SE THV for aortic ViV procedures which might be superior with regard to coronary access or subsequent valve reintervention. We herein aim to evaluate a latest-generation SE intra-annular THV for aortic ViV procedures. Between May 2022 and November 2022, five consecutive patients (4/5 female with mean age of 76.2 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score of 2.9%) received ViV TAVI using the Navitor system (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) for treatment of failing surgical bioprostheses or THV. Data were retrospectively analyzed according to updated Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions. At 30 days, absence of mortality and VARC-3 adjudicated clinical endpoints were documented. Echocardiography at 30 days revealed complete absence of paravalvular leakage and single-digit mean transvalvular gradients (mean of 6.0 mmHg) in all patients. The investigated intra-annular SE THV results in excellent 30-day outcomes for aortic ViV procedures for failing surgical bioprostheses or THV. Despite the intra-annular design, hemodynamic results were excellent, even in small bioprostheses. Ease of use of this valve platform is reflected by only two cycles of resheathing in five ViV procedures with hemodynamic stability during all steps of valve deployment.

Three-step surgical management algorithm for annular rupture in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

ObjectiveWhereas transcatheter aortic valve replacement is widely implemented, annular rupture is a devastating complication and could be highly mortal. However, owing to its rare incidence, the optimal treatment algorithm has not been established. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a 3-step algorithm to treat annulus rupture. MethodsFrom 2009 to 2022, 8 patients of 1083 transcatheter aortic valve implantation (0.8%) developed annulus rupture and were treated with the three-step algorithm. The algorithm was composed of a first step (pericardial drainage and protamine neutralization with blood pressure control), second step (manual hemostatic compression via full/partial sternotomy), and a third step (conservative treatment or radical surgical correction). ResultsThe median age at the procedure was 85 (78-88) years and 7 female patients were included in this study. Two (25%) patients had end-stage renal failure under hemodialysis, and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 8.9% (2.1%-23.2%). The implanted transcatheter heart valves (THVs) were 7 balloon-expandable THVs and 1 self-expandable THV with balloon postdilatation. Under this strategy, 8 (100%) patients underwent pericardial drainage as first step and 5 patients achieved hemostasis. Of these, patient 1 demonstrated bleeding from left sinus of Valsalva and required a Bentall procedure. Although the etiology of this phenomenon was not investigated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography, it might be derived from pseudoaneurysm rupture or delayed annular rupture. In 2 patients, the second step treatment was needed for hemostasis. Third-step treatment was conducted in 1 patient. Postoperatively, 6 patients could be discharged without critical complications whereas 2 patients died during the hospitalization. There were no other complications during the followed-up (584 [7-1614]) days. ConclusionsIn accordance with the three-step algorithm, 6 patients, including those with high-risk or inoperative status, survived.

Self-expanding vs. balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves in small aortic annuli.

Clinical consequences of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is currently in the focus of clinical research. Patients with small aortic annulus are at higher risk to display PPM. Data on incidence and clinical consequences of PPM after TAVR with either balloon-expandable (BEV) or self-expanding (SEV) transcatheter heart valves in small aortic annulus are sparse. Patients with small aortic annulus (perimeter < 72 mm or aortic annulus area < 400 mm2) who underwent BEV or SEV with contemporary transcatheter heart valve types were identified from the institutional TAVR database. Propensity score matching was applied for imbalanced baseline characteristics between patients undergoing BEV or SEV. Echocardiography and clinical follow-up beyond 3 years was reported following VARC-3 recommendations. Primary endpoint was the incidence of pre-discharge PPM and its association with 3-year mortality. From a total of 507 patients with small aortic annulus, 192 matched patient pairs with SEV or BEV were identified. Mean age was 81 ± 7 (SEV) vs. 81 ± 6 (BEV) years (p = 0.5), aortic annulus perimeter was 69 ± 3 vs.69 ± 3 mm, (p = 0.8), annulus area was 357 ± 27 vs.357 ± 27 mm2 (p = 0.8), and EuroScore II was 5.8 ± 6.6 vs.5.7 ± 7.2 (p = 0.9). SEV resulted in less moderate (20% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) and severe pre-discharge PPM (9% vs.18%, p < 0.001) compared to BEV. At discharge (7 ± 4 vs. 12 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.003) and at 1-year follow-up (7 ± 5 vs.13 ± 3 mmHg, p < 0.001), SEV displayed lower mean gradients compared to BEV. Estimated survival after SEV was 85% (95% confidence interval (CI): 80%-90%) at 1 year, 80% (95% CI: 75%-86%) at 2 years, and 71% (95% CI: 65%-78%) at 3 years; estimated survival after BEV was 87% (95% CI: 82%-92%) at 1 year, 81% (95% CI: 75%-86%) at 2 years, and 72% (95% CI: 66%-79%) at 3 years, with no significant difference among the groups (p = 0.9) Body surface area (OR: 1.35, p < 0.001), implantation of BEV (odds ratio (OR): 3.32, p < 0.001), and the absence of postdilatation (OR: 2.16, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for any PPM. At 3 years, patients without PPM had a higher 3-year survival compared with patients with ≥moderate PPM (77% vs. 67%, p = 0.03). BEV implantation in patients with small annulus was associated with a twofold higher incidence of pre-discharge severe PPM compared to SEV implantation. Survival at 3 years after TAVR was similar after BEV and SEV. However, patients with the absence of pre-discharge PPM had a higher 3-year survival compared to patients with ≥moderate PPM.

Comparison of a Novel Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve with Two Established Devices for Treatment of Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses

Comparison of a Novel Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve with Two Established Devices for Treatment of Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses

Assessment of Hemodynamics and Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch by Valve Size for an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve at 30 Days

Assessment of Hemodynamics and Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch by Valve Size for an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve at 30 Days