Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Group Research Articles

An Exploratory Retrospective Data Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty and Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in Vienna, Austria, from the Year 2012 to 2022.

Background and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the short-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) with argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) in patients with glaucoma in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted as a retrospective case-control study. The main outcome was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) three months after laser surgery. In addition, the number of substances used for lowering of IOP and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results: Charts from 25 patients were included in the present study, of which 12 had received ALT and 13 SLT. In both groups, IOP significantly decreased from baseline values 6 weeks and 3 months after laser treatment (p < 0.01 vs. baseline at each timepoint for both groups). While after 6 weeks, no difference between groups was found, after 3 months, the decrease in IOP was significantly more pronounced in the SLT group (-26 ± 21% in the ALT group vs. -41 ± 14% in the SLT group, p = 0.018 between groups, ANOVA). Three months after laser treatment, the number of IOP-lowering substances used by each patient had decreased with no difference between groups (ALT: from 2.7 ± 0.8 to 2.3 ± 0.9 substances; SLT: from 1.8 ± 1.2 to 1.3 ± 1.1 substances, p = 0.386). Only a few AEs were observed. Two patients in the ALT and one patient in the SLT group required trabeculectomy within 1 year after laser treatment due to IOP decompensation. Conclusions: In the present study, SLT was at least as effective as ALT with fewer AEs and a similar reduction in concomitant IOP-lowering medication.

Intraoperative iStent versus postoperative selective laser trabeculoplasty in early glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery: A retrospective comparative study

To compare the efficacy and safety of iStent inject® versus 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in patients with early glaucoma undergoing cataract surgery. A retrospective non-randomized study was conducted in 73 eyes divided into two groups: cataract surgery+intraoperative iStent (n=40) versus cataract surgery+postoperative SLT at one month (n=33). The primary endpoint was intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering≥20% between baseline and 6 months postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were IOP lowering at 1, 6 and 12 months, and the mean number of IOP-lowering medications at 6 and 12 months. The mean baseline IOP was 19.1 mmHg with no significant difference between groups. The mean baseline number of IOP-lowering medications was higher in the iStent group (n=1.95) compared to the SLT group (n=1.53; P=0.04). At 6 months, 18 (60%) patients in the SLT group and 20 (51%) patients in the iStent group achieved IOP lowering≥20% with no significant difference between groups (P=0.431). At 6 months, no difference in the mean number of IOP-lowering medications was found between groups (-0.92 and -0.89 in the iStent and SLT groups, respectively). Similar results were found at 12 months. These results suggest similar safety and efficacy of intraoperative iStent and postoperative 360° SLT in lowering IOP and reducing glaucoma eye drops in early glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery. Treatment choice should be based on the ophthalmologist's experience and on the cost-benefit ratio.

Fixed High Energy Versus Standard Titrated Energy Settings for Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.

Fixed high-energy selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is associated with a greater reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the standard titrated approach at up to 36 months postprocedure. There is no consensus on ideal SLT procedural laser energy settings. This study aims to compare fixed high-energy SLT to the standard titrated-energy approach within the setting of a residency training program. Patients over the age of 18 years received SLT between 2011 and 2017, a total of 354 eyes. Patients with a prior history of SLT were excluded. Retrospective review of clinical data from 354 eyes that underwent SLT. Eyes that underwent SLT using fixed high energy (1.2 mJ/spot) were compared with those with the standard titrated approach starting at 0.8 mJ/spot and titrating to "champagne" bubbles. The entirety of the angle was treated using a Lumenis laser set to the SLT setting (532 nm). No repeat treatments were included. IOP and glaucoma medications. In our residency training program, fixed high-energy SLT was associated with a reduction in IOP compared with a baseline of -4.65 (±4.49, n = 120), -3.79 (±4.49, n = 109), and -4.40 (±5.01, n =119) while standard titrated-energy was associated with IOP reduction of -2.07 (±5.06, n = 133), -2.67 (±5.28, n = 107), and -1.88 (±4.96, n = 115) at each respective postprocedural time point (12, 24, and 36 months). The fixed high-energy SLT group had significantly greater IOP reduction at 12 months and 36 months. The same comparison was performed for medication naïve individuals. For these individuals, fixed high-energy SLT resulted in IOP reductions of -6.88 (±3.72, n = 47), -6.01 (±3.80, n = 41), and -6.52 (±4.10, n = 46) while standard titrated-energy had IOP reductions of -3.82 (±4.51, n = 25), -1.85 (±4.88, n = 20), and -0.65 (±4.64, n = 27). For medication naïve individuals, fixed high-energy SLT resulted in a significantly greater reduction in IOP at each respective time point. Complication rates (IOP spike, iritis, and macular edema) were similar between the two groups. The study is limited by overall poor response to standard-energy treatments, whereas high-energy treatments showed similar efficacy to those in literature. This study demonstrates that fixed-energy SLT produces at least equivalent results compared with the standard-energy approach, without an increase in adverse outcomes. Particularly in the medication naïve subpopulation, fixed-energy SLT was associated with a significantly greater IOP reduction at each respective time point. The study is limited by overall poor response to standard-energy treatments, with our results showing decreased IOP reduction compared with those of previous studies. These poor outcomes of the standard SLT group may be responsible for our conclusion that fixed high-energy SLT results in a greater reduction in IOP. These results may be useful when considering optimal SLT procedural energy in future studies for validation.

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus micropulse laser trabeculoplasty for intraocular pressure control in patients with primary open angle glaucoma: a 12-month retrospective comparative study.

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) requiring additional IOP control. In this retrospective, comparative study, we reviewed the charts of POAG patients requiring additional IOP lowering, who underwent either SLT or MLT and were followed for at least one year. We evaluated mean intraocular pressure (IOP), mean IOP reduction from baseline and mean number of glaucoma medications 1, 3, 6 and 12months after treatment. Success rates (success defined as IOP ≤ 21mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline IOP without additional medications, new laser session, or glaucoma surgery) at one year were also compared. A total of 98 POAG patients were included, 52 individuals in the SLT group and 46 in the MLT group. Laser treatment resulted in significant mean IOP reductions from baseline in both groups (SLT = -6.0 ± 3.3mmHg (24.9%) and MLT = -5.8 ± 2.6mmHg (23.4%)) (p < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the mean IOP reductions in both groups (p = 0.74). At 12months, the mean number of glaucoma medications was significantly smaller in the SLT group (1.17 + 0.4) when compared to the MLT group (2.21 + 0.2) (p = 0.001). Additionally, after 12months, success was obtained in 32 (61.5%) SLT cases compared to 27 (58.7%) MLT-treated eyes (p = 1.0). MLT and SLT are both effective in controlling the IOP in POAG patients requiring additional IOP reduction. However, after 12months, SLT demonstrated a greater efficacy in reducing medication burden when compared to MLT.Trial registration: CEP/CONEP/MS Brazil 40948620.9.0000.5600.

Comparison of success rate and intraocular pressure spikes between selective laser trabeculoplasty and micropulse laser trabeculoplasty in African American and Hispanic patients.

To examine the efficacy and safety of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) versus selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in a large cohort of primarily African American and Hispanic patients. A single center retrospective comparative cohort review conducted at Cook County Health facilities that included patients with a diagnosis of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who received an SLT or MLT procedure between January 2017 and May 2021. Totally 131 eyes of 99 patients were analyzed. The 77 eyes received SLT and 54 received MLT. Seven out of 77 eyes in the SLT group (9.1%) and 1 out of 54 eyes in the MLT group (1.9%) had an IOP spike (defined as > 5 mm Hg) at either 1h or 1wk after procedure (P=0.05, Chi-squared test with Haldane-Anscombe correction). The procedure failure rate at one year was 50% for SLT and 48% for MLT (P=0.31). MLT has a significantly lower incidence of pressure spikes and a similar treatment failure rate at 1-year post-procedure, demonstrating that it is a reasonable alternative compared to SLT.

The IOP lowering effects of "planning" selective laser trabeculoplasty in open angle glaucoma.

PurposeTo investigate whether the planning of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) influences the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG).MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study conducted on patients with OAG who planned to undergo SLT treatment (SLT group) or a visual field examination (VF group), we collected the demographic data, IOP on the planning day and on the scheduled day of the SLT treatment or VF examination. ΔIOP was defined as the IOP change between the planning day and the scheduled day. We used multivariable regression analyses and linear mixed model to evaluate the association between the abovementioned factors and ΔIOP in the VF group and the treatment eye (SLTt) and fellow eye (SLTf) of the SLT group.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-three eyes of 102 patients with OAG were included, of which 51 patients in the SLT group and 51 patients in the VF group. The ΔIOP was −1.92 ± 2.77 mmHg in the SLTt, −0.65 ± 2.47 mmHg in the SLTf and −0.08 ± 1.73 mmHg in the VF group (P < 0.05). Both multivariable regression analysis between the VF and SLTt group and linear mixed model in the SLT group showed significant negative association between the ΔIOP and SLT arrangement (P < 0.05). There was no significant association between ΔIOP and age, gender, baseline IOP, IOP fluctuation, nor SE.ConclusionsThe IOP was significantly reduced in patients with OAG after “planning” of SLT treatment, even without actual performing the laser treatment in our retrospective case-control study.

Predictors of Initial Glaucoma Therapy: Laser Trabeculoplasty Versus Medication

Background: Glaucoma is the most common cause of blindness in the world. If not recognized and treated early enough, open-angle glaucoma can be a severe ocular illness that can lead to blindness. A gradual loss of ganglion cells leads to the optic nerve head cupping, which is the pathogenic process. Objective: The main aim of this study was to determine if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is superior to topical medication as the first-line treatment for open-angle glaucoma.Material &amp; Methods:This prospective comparative study was conducted in 225 patients (450 eyes) at Deen Mohd. Eye Hospital &amp; Research Center from July 2019 to July 2021.The patients were randomly divided into two groups; Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT group)and medical therapy group.Results:The study was conducted between 25 to 85 years of patients where the majority were between 46 to 65 years age group;58% patientswere male, and 42% were female. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 18.2mm Hg for the SLT group and 17.6mm Hg for the medical therapy group. Overall, mean pressures and IOP lowering were not statistically different between the two treatment groups.Conclusions:In the last follow-up, 11% of the eyes had been stepped to additional SLT in the SLT arm, and 27% of the eyes in the medical arm required more medications to reach the target IOP range. The main risk factor is high intraocular pressure; however additional potential risk factors include optic nerve vascular insufficiency, neuronal degeneration, and hereditary factors. More research and prospective trials on intraocular pressure control and disease progression are needed to understand the long-term implications.

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial

SummaryBackgroundGlaucoma is a major cause of sight loss worldwide, with the highest regional prevalence and incidence reported in Africa. The most common low-cost treatment used to control glaucoma is long-term timolol eye drops. However, low adherence is a major challenge. We aimed to investigate whether selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) was superior to timolol eye drops for controlling intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma.MethodsWe did a two-arm, parallel-group, single-masked randomised controlled trial at the Eye Department of Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had open-angle glaucoma and an IOP above 21 mm Hg, and did not have asthma or a history of glaucoma surgery or laser. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 0·5% timolol eye drops to administer twice daily or to receive SLT. The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes from both groups with treatment success, defined as an IOP below or equal to target pressure according to glaucoma severity, at 12 months following randomisation. Re-explanation of eye drop application or a repeat SLT was permitted once. The primary analysis was by modified intention-to-treat, excluding participants lost to follow-up, using logistic regression; generalised estimating equations were used to adjust for the correlation between eyes. This trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201508001235339.Findings840 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 201 (24%) participants (382 eligible eyes) were enrolled between Aug 31, 2015, and May 12, 2017. 100 (50%) participants (191 eyes) were randomly assigned to the timolol group and 101 (50%; 191 eyes) to the SLT group. After 1 year, 339 (89%) of 382 eyes were analysed. Treatment was successful in 55 (31%) of 176 eyes in the timolol group (16 [29%] of 55 eyes required repeat administration counselling) and in 99 (61%) of 163 eyes in the SLT group (33 [33%] of 99 eyes required repeat SLT; odds ratio 3·37 [95% CI 1·96–5·80]; p<0·0001). Adverse events (mostly unrelated to ocular events) occurred in ten (10%) participants in the timolol group and in eight (8%) participants in the SLT group (p=0·61).InterpretationSLT was superior to timolol eye drops for managing patients with open-angle high-pressure glaucoma for 1 year in Tanzania. SLT has the potential to transform the management of glaucoma in sub-Saharan Africa, even where the prevalence of advanced glaucoma is high.FundingChristian Blind Mission, Seeing is Believing Innovation Fund, and the Wellcome Trust.TranslationsFor the Kiswahili, French and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Impact of Short-Term Topical Steroid Therapy on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Efficacy.

Background: To evaluate whether short-term use of topical steroid therapy affected the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for primary open-glaucoma (POAG). Methods: 25 eyes of 25 patients, who used a drop of dexamethasone 0.1% 4 times a day for 7 days as post-laser therapy, formed the Steroid SLT group and 24 eyes of 24 patients, where no topical steroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents as post-laser therapy were used, formed the No-steroid SLT group. Success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering exceeding 20% of pretreatment IOP. Results: The mean follow-up time was 21.24 months for the Steroid SLT group and 20.25 months for the No-steroid SLT group (p = 0.990). No significant difference was found between the two groups for mean pretreatment IOP (22.20 mmHg vs. 22.33 mmHg), and for mean IOP reductions during whole follow-up period. At all follow-up visits, the mean IOP reductions were smaller in the Steroid SLT group than in the No-steroid SLT group. At all follow-up visits, the mean percent IOP reduction was smaller in the Steroid SLT group than in the No-steroid SLT group, and such a difference was significant at 12 months (25.4% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.047) and 24 months (25.3% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.024). According to the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the 24-month success rate was 84% in the Steroid SLT group and 79.2% in the No-steroid SLT group, with no differences between the groups (p = 0.675). Conclusion: Short-term use of topical steroid therapy had no impact on the efficacy of SLT for POAG.

Effectiveness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Applied to 360° vs. 180° of the Angle.

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and safety of 360° and 180° of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods Retrospective cohort study. The main outcome measure was the Kaplan–Meier analysis comparing the cumulative probabilities of survival between the 360° and 180° SLT groups in terms of IOP reduction. Success was defined as ≥20% IOP reduction from baseline with an IOP between 5–18 mmHg and ≤1 glaucoma medication added postoperatively. Additional outcome measures included changes in average IOP, number of glaucoma medications, and the incidence of postoperative IOP spikes. Measurements were obtained at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Results Two hundred and fifty-eight eyes of 258 patients were included in the 360° group, and 196 eyes of 196 patients were included in the 180° group. The mean IOP reductions at 2 years were 2.21 ± 2.02 mmHg and 2.43 ± 1.81 mmHg (p=0.33) in the 180° and 360° groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative IOP spikes between the two groups. There was a significant difference in the survival curves of the two groups (p=0.035). The Cox proportional-hazard model indicated that 360° of SLT application was a significant predictor of long-term success (p=0.030). Conclusions 360° of SLT application seems to provide for greater long-term IOP control than 180° of application without putting patients at an elevated risk for postoperative IOP spikes.

Clinical Outcomes of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty Compared to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty at One Year in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

BackgroundThere is limited long-term data comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) to the newer micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) using a laser emitting at 532 nm. In this study, we determine the effectiveness and safety of MLT compared to SLT.DesignRetrospective comparative cohort study.ParticipantsA total of 85 consecutive eyes received SLT and 43 consecutive eyes received MLT.MethodsPatients with open-angle glaucoma receiving their first treatment of laser trabeculoplasty were included. Exclusion criteria are prior laser trabeculoplasty, laser cyclophotocoagulation or glaucoma surgery, and follow-up of less than 1 year.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was success at 1 year, defined as a reduction in intraocular eye pressure (IOP) by ≥20% from baseline or met prespecified target IOP with no additional glaucoma medication or subsequent glaucoma intervention.ResultsBaseline IOP was 18.0 mmHg (95% CI=16.4–19.5) in the MLT group on an average of 1.8 (95% CI=1.4–2.2) glaucoma medications compared to 18.2 mmHg (95% CI=17.2–19.3) for the SLT group on an average of 2.0 (95% CI=1.6–2.3) medications. At 1-hour post-laser, the SLT group had more transient IOP spikes (MLT 5% vs SLT 16%, P=0.10). There was a trend toward increased success in the SLT group compared to MLT at 1 year (relative risk=1.4, 95% CI=0.8–2.5, P=0.30).Conclusion and RelevanceEyes had similar success after MLT compared to SLT at 1 year. Laser trabeculoplasty with either method could be offered as treatment with consideration of MLT in those eyes where IOP spikes should be avoided.

Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of ripasudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor, and selective laser trabeculoplasty as adjuvant therapy in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma.

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effects of ripasudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor, and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as adjuvant therapy in Japanese glaucoma patients and to identify the factors associated with treatment success. We performed a retrospective medical chart review of patients with glaucoma who received ripasudil or SLT as an adjuvant therapy. We collected data on 65 eyes (65 patients) with primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, or exfoliation glaucoma with at least 12months of follow-up. IOP and number of glaucoma medications at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12months were compared between and within groups. A repeated-measures mixed model was used to perform statistical analysis. We also investigated factors associated with treatment success, which was defined as ≥ 20% reduction in IOP at all follow-up periods, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significant IOP reduction was observed at all time-points after treatment in the ripasudil group (n = 33) and in the SLT group (n = 32), with no statistically significant difference between the groups before or after treatment. Patients in the SLT group used more anti-glaucoma medications before treatment, but fewer during follow-up, than those in the ripasudil group. Regardless of treatment, higher baseline IOP was associated with treatment success [crude odds ratio: 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.38), adjusted odds ratio: 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.77)]. Adjuvant SLT or ripasudil in patients with inadequately controlled glaucoma both reduced IOP to a similar degree, but SLT contributed to reducing the number of medications used.

Outcome of phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma after selective laser trabeculoplasty.

PurposeTo investigate the outcome of phacoemulsification in selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT)-treated eyes.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who had open angle glaucoma (OAG) with previous SLT who underwent phacoemulsification. We evaluated intraocular pressure (IOP), length of glaucoma control without treatment, and antiglaucoma medication or surgery. SLT-treated eyes that did not receive phacoemulsification were retrospectively chosen as a control. We investigated factors related to outcome of phacoemulsification by multivariate analysis.Results42 eyes with previous SLT that underwent phacoemulsification and 40 controls were retrospectively evaluated. Phacoemulsification was performed 52 ± 15 months after SLT. After a mean follow-up of 74 ± 21 months, mean IOP was significantly decreased in the phaco group by 2.2 ± 2.7 mmHg (p < 0.001). In the SLT group, mean IOP was decreased by 0.8 ± 2.8 mmHg (p < 0.001). 9 eyes (16.7%) in the phaco group and 11 eyes (19.0%) of the SLT group needed topical treatment, and no eye needed glaucoma surgery in both groups. The factor related to success was higher baseline IOP (p = 0.002).ConclusionPrior SLT didn’t negatively influence phacoemulsification in patients with OAG. Phacoemulsification lowered IOP effectively and safely in OAG patients who were treated with SLT.

Visual Field Outcomes from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT)

To compare visual field outcomes of ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients treated first with medical therapy with those treated first with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). Secondary analysis of patients from the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Three hundred forty-four patients (588 eyes) treated first with medical therapy and 344 patients (590 eyes) treated first with SLT. Visual fields (VFs) were measured using standard automated perimetry and arranged in series (median length and duration, 9 VFs over 48 months). Hierarchical linear models were used to estimate pointwise VF progression rates, which were then averaged to produce a global progression estimate for each eye. Proportions of points and patients in each treatment group with fast (<-1 dB/year) or moderate (<-0.5 dB/year) progression were compared using log-binomial regression. Pointwise and global progression rates of total deviation (TD) and pattern deviation (PD). A greater proportion of eyes underwent moderate or fast TD progression in the medical therapy group compared with the SLT group (26.2% vs. 16.9%; risk ratio [RR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.93; P < 0.001). A similar pattern was observed for pointwise rates (medical therapy, 26.1% vs. SLT, 19.0%; RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.33-1.42; P < 0.001). A greater proportion of pointwise PD rates were categorized as moderate or fast in the medical therapy group (medical therapy, 11.5% vs. SLT, 8.3%; RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.32-1.46; P < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in the proportion of eyes that underwent moderate or fast PD progression (medical therapy, 9.9% vs. SLT, 7.1%; RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.95, 2.03; P = 0.0928). A slightly larger proportion of ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients treated first with medical therapy underwent rapid VF progression compared with those treated first with SLT.

Pattern scanning laser trabeculoplasty versus selective laser trabeculoplasty in patients with primary open angle glaucoma

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the reduction percent of intraocular pressure (IOP) after selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) or pattern laser scanning trabeculoplasty (PSLT) in a group of patients with hypertensive glaucoma.Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental prospective study of the patients with baseline IOP of 20 mmHg or more (with at least 1 IOP lowering medication) underwent either PSLT or SLT at 360°. IOP was measured in the following time points: Hour 1, Day 1 and 7, months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after the laser procedure.Results: The mean age was 68.1 ± 10.1 in the PSLT group and 71.8 ± 4.0 in the SLT group. Eleven eyes (8 patients) underwent PSLT and 9 eyes (6 patients) underwent SLT. Baseline IOP was 22.45 ± 2.4 mmHg, PSLT; 25.0 ± 2.2 mmHg, SLT; (P > 0.05) on an average of 2.4 medications. In the PSLT group, the mean IOP at 1 h, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months was 19.0 ± 5.0, 14.7 ± 2.4, 15.3 ± 3.0, 14.5 ± 2.7, and 13.0 ± 3.1, respectively. In the SLT group, the mean IOP at 1 h, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months was 25.6 ± 6.4, 15.9 ± 4.4, 15.3 ± 2.6, 16.7 ± 4.8, and 21.2 ± 4.3, respectively. IOP was significantly lower in the PSLT group compared to the SLT group at 1 h (P < 0.01) and 12 months (P < 0.01). No serious adverse events were recorded.Conclusions: PSLT was similar in effect compared to SLT at 1, 3, 6 months, and more effective than SLT at 12 months.

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medication as initial glaucoma treatment: the glaucoma initial treatment study randomised clinical trial

Background/AimsTo determine if selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is superior to topical medication as a first-line treatment for glaucoma on quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes.MethodsIn this international, longitudinal, multisite...

&lt;p&gt;Comparison of successful outcome predictors for MicroPulse&lt;sup&gt;®&lt;/sup&gt; laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty at 6 months&lt;/p&gt;

Purpose: To identify and compare factors predictive of successful outcome for MicroPulse® laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT).Methods: 50 MLT-treated eyes and 50 SLT-treated eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients were reviewed for baseline characteristics, pre- and postoperative IOP and medications, and adverse events including postoperative IOP elevation >5 mmHg (IOP spikes) through 6 months of follow-up. Success was defined as ≥20% IOP reduction or ≥1 medication reduction without additional IOP lowering procedures at 6 months follow-up.Results: MLT and SLT had similar success rates (44% vs 40%, P=0.983). Older age predicted success for SLT (P=0.013) but not MLT (P=0.154). Both MLT and SLT led to greater IOP lowering in patients with baseline IOP >18 mmHg, but only for SLT did baseline IOP have a significant association with success (P=0.035 vs P=0.983). Number of laser shots was associated with success in MLT (P=0.031) but not in SLT (P=0.970). Glaucoma severity and pigmentation of the trabecular meshwork (PTM) were not associated with rate of success for either group. The rate of IOP spikes was significantly (P=0.022) higher in the SLT group (10%) compared to none in the MLT group. No other complications or visually significant adverse events occurred in either group.Conclusion: Although MLT and SLT resulted in similar success rates, older age and higher baseline IOP predicted success for SLT while MLT was equally efficacious regardless of these factors. Glaucoma severity and PTM were not associated with success of either laser procedures. 10% of SLT patients experienced IOP spike post procedure, whereas none in the MLT group did. MLT may be a safer alternative to SLT that is effective in lowering IOP and need for medications for a wider variety of patients with open angle glaucoma.

Establishing an allied health professional delivered selective laser trabeculoplasty service in Scotland.

To describe the process of establishing a selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) service delivered by experienced allied health professionals (AHP) in a Scottish NHS Hospital Eye Service, and assess the safety and efficacy in comparison with SLT performed by ophthalmologists. A training scheme for AHPs who were experienced in extended roles within the glaucoma service was developed, consisting of supervised training by a consultant ophthalmologist specialising in glaucoma leading to the AHPs independently delivering SLT. A prospective audit of consecutive SLT procedures performed by AHPs between November 2015 and April 2017 was performed. Data were analysed and compared to a previous intradepartmental audit of SLT performed by ophthalmologists (consultants and trainees). A total of 325 eyes of 208 patients underwent SLT, of which 117 patients had bilateral SLT in a single session. The overall rate of complications was 3.9%, however these were minor and/or self-limiting (this compared to a 3.8% complication rate in the ophthalmologist delivered SLT series). The rate of intraocular pressure (IOP) spike was 0.3%, compared to 1.4% in the ophthalmologist delivered SLT series. Mean IOP at listing was 20.9±5.1mmHg, 17.3±4.5mmHg at 3months post SLT and 17.6±3.7mmHg at 12months-a median reduction of 16.7% at 3months and 17.4% at 12months. There was no statistically significant difference between the percentage reduction in IOP in the AHP and ophthalmologist delivered SLT groups at 3 or 12months. This is the first service of its kind in Scotland and the outcomes of this study demonstrate that the AHP delivered SLT service is at least as safe as the previous ophthalmologist delivered SLT service. The data demonstrate a similar efficacy between AHP and ophthalmologist delivered SLT. In the face of increasing demand and workload, this is a practical model in service commissioning to free up medical clinicians for more complex glaucoma management.

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

SummaryBackgroundPrimary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension are habitually treated with eye drops that lower intraocular pressure. Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a safe alternative but is rarely used as first-line treatment. We compared the two.MethodsIn this observer-masked, randomised controlled trial treatment-naive patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and no ocular comorbidities were recruited between 2012 and 2014 at six UK hospitals. They were randomly allocated (web-based randomisation) to initial selective laser trabeculoplasty or to eye drops. An objective target intraocular pressure was set according to glaucoma severity. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 3 years (assessed by EQ-5D). Secondary outcomes were cost and cost-effectiveness, disease-specific HRQoL, clinical effectiveness, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN32038223).FindingsOf 718 patients enrolled, 356 were randomised to the selective laser trabeculoplasty and 362 to the eye drops group. 652 (91%) returned the primary outcome questionnaire at 36 months. Average EQ-5D score was 0·89 (SD 0·18) in the selective laser trabeculoplasty group versus 0·90 (SD 0·16) in the eye drops group, with no significant difference (difference 0·01, 95% CI −0·01 to 0·03; p=0·23). At 36 months, 74·2% (95% CI 69·3–78·6) of patients in the selective laser trabeculoplasty group required no drops to maintain intraocular pressure at target. Eyes of patients in the selective laser trabeculoplasty group were within target intracoluar pressure at more visits (93·0%) than in the eye drops group (91·3%), with glaucoma surgery to lower intraocular pressure required in none versus 11 patients. Over 36 months, from an ophthalmology cost perspective, there was a 97% probability of selective laser trabeculoplasty as first treatment being more cost-effective than eye drops first at a willingness to pay of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.InterpretationSelective laser trabeculoplasty should be offered as a first-line treatment for open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, supporting a change in clinical practice.FundingNational Institute for Health Research, Health and Technology Assessment Programme.

Evaluating selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients

ObjectiveLaser trabeculoplasty effectively reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open angle glaucoma, with argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) showing equivalent outcomes. However, it is unclear which laser modality is more effective in pseudoexfoliation (PXE) glaucoma. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ALT and SLT in PXE glaucoma. DesignRetrospective cohort study. MethodsA chart review evaluating patients diagnosed with PXE glaucoma and treated with laser trabeculoplasty from 2005-2015. Patients with previous glaucoma surgery, other forms of secondary glaucoma, ocular surgery within six months of initial trabeculoplasty or lacking preoperative IOP measurements were excluded. Post-laser measurements were recorded until 24 months after initial intervention. Follow-up data was censored if the patient underwent a subsequent trabeculoplasty different from initial laser treatment. ResultsWe included 84 patients in the ALT group and 123 in the SLT group. The mean (SD) baseline IOP values were 22.7 (±5.6) and 21.6 (±4.8) respectively (p = 0.11), while number of medications were 2.0 (±1.0) and 1.8 (±1.3) for ALT and SLT groups respectively (p = 0.36). The mean IOP reduction for the ALT group at 6, 12 and 24 months were 5.2 (±6.1), 5.4 (±6.9), and 4.9(±7.7) respectively. The corresponding values for the SLT group were 3.4 (±5.2), 3.8 (±4.6), and 4.6 (±6.5). Comparison of both lasers at each time point revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in IOP reduction or reduction of glaucoma medication. ConclusionsOur study showed equivalent efficacy between ALT and SLT in patients with PXE glaucoma.