Selective Adenosine A1 Antagonist Research Articles

Effects of Selen on the Antidepressant-like Activity of Agents Affecting the Adenosinergic Neurotransmission.

The main goal of this study was to determine the antidepressant-like potential of the co-administration of sodium selenite (Se) and the selective adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists DPCPX and istradefylline (IST), respectively, in mice despair tests. Biochemical studies were performed to elucidate the action mechanisms of the investigated treatment strategies. The results confirmed that, when administered by itself, Se exerts an antidepressant-like effect in the FST and TST and that this activity is dose-dependent. Further experiments demonstrated that Se (0.25 mg/kg) significantly enhanced the activity of mice in both tests when co-administered with DPCPX (1 mg/kg) and IST (0.5 mg/kg) at doses which would be ineffective if administered individually. Our research revealed that neither DPCPX, IST, nor Se or combinations of the tested substances induced significant changes in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in mice serum vs. the NaCl-treated group. However, we observed a decrease in the mRNA level of antioxidant defense enzymes. Molecular studies also showed changes in the expression of the Slc6a15, Comt, and Adora1 genes, particularly after exposure to the combination of Se and DPCPX, which indicates a beneficial effect and may help to explain the key mechanism of the antidepressant effect. The combination of Se with substances attenuating adenosine neurotransmission may become a new therapeutic strategy for patients with depression.

The Effects of the Adenosine Receptor Antagonists on the Reverse of Cardiovascular Toxic Effects Induced by Citalopram In-Vivo Rat Model of Poisoning.

Citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that requires routine cardiac monitoring to prevent a toxic dose. Prolongation of the QT interval has been observed in acute citalopram poisoning. Our previous experimental study showed that citalopram may be lead to QT prolongation by stimulating adenosine A1 receptors without affecting the release of adenosine. We examined the effects of adenosine receptor antagonists in reversing the cardiovascular toxic effects induced by citalopram in rats. Animal experimentation. Rats were divided into three groups randomly (n=7 for each group). Sodium cromoglycate (20 mg/kg) was administered to all rats to inhibit adenosine A3 receptor mast cell activation. Citalopram toxicity was achieved by citalopram infusion (4 mg/kg/min) for 20 minutes. After citalopram infusion, in the control group (Group 1), rats were given an infusion of dextrose solution for 60 minutes. In treatment groups, the selective adenosine A1 antagonist DPCPX (Group 2, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, 20 μg/kg/min) or the selective A2a antagonist CSC (Group 3, 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine, 24 μg/kg/min) was infused for 60 minutes. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), QRS duration and QT interval measurements were followed during the experiment period. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests. Citalopram infusion reduced MAP and HR and prolonged the QT interval. It did not cause any significant difference in QRS duration in any group. When compared to the control group, DPCPX after citalopram infusion shortened the prolongation of the QT interval after 40, 50 and 60 minutes (p<0.01). DPCPX infusion shortened the prolongation of the QT interval at 60 minutes compared with the CSC group (p<0.05). CSC infusion shortened the prolongation of the QT at 60 minutes compared with the control group (p<0.05). DPCPX improved QT interval prolongation in citalopram toxicity. The results of this study show that mechanism of cardiovascular toxicity induced by citalopram may be related adenosine A1 receptor stimulation. Adenosine A1 receptor antagonists may be used for the treatment of citalopram toxicity.

Chronic treatment with DCPCX, an adenosine A1 antagonist, worsens long-term memory

Alzheimer's disease is characterized by progressive cognitive disturbances and neurotransmitter dysfunction. Previous studies targeting the adrenergic A1 pathway suggest that this plays a role in cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Previous studies have reported that acute treatment with A1 antagonists appears to improve behavioral deficits in rodent models of memory and behavioral impairment. In this study, we addressed whether the chronic administration of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, a potent and selective adenosine A1 antagonist, could reverse the memory deficits found in aged APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Chronic treatment did not improve memory in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model and resulted in reduced exploratory behavior, suggestive of reduced anxiety, and a worsening of long-term memory in nontransgenic mice. These results have important implications for understanding the mechanisms of A1 receptor modulation as a target in Alzheimer's disease therapy.

Effects of Adenosine Receptor Antagonists on Survival in Amitriptyline-poisoned Mice

Objective: We investigated the effects of adenosine receptor antagonists on survival rates in a mouse model of amitriptyline poisoning.Materials and Methods: In the preliminary study, amitriptyline was given at doses of 75, 100, and 125 mg/ kg to mice intraperitoneally (i.p.; n = 20 for each dose) to determine the lethal dose at 50% (LD50). Different doses (1, 3, and 5 mg/kg) of DPCPX (selective adenosine A1 antagonists, n = 10 for each dose, total n = 30) or CSC (selective adenosine A2a antagonists, n = 10 for each dose, total n = 30) were given i.p. to find the nonlethal dose. After the administration of the LD50 dose of amitriptyline (125 mg/kg), mice were treated with DPCPX (3 mg/kg), CSC (3 mg/kg), saline, or DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) (n = 25 for each group). Mice were observed during a 24-hour period.Results: Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 24-hour survival rate was 52% (13/25) for saline and 68% (17/25), 52% (13/25), and 40% (10/25) for the DPCPX, CSC, and DMSO groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival rates among the groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Adenosine antagonists failed to increase the survival rates of amitriptyline-poisoned mice. Further studies are needed with repeated doses of adenosine antagonists.

Caffeine and a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist induce sensitization and cross-sensitization behavior associated with increased striatal dopamine in mice

BackgroundCaffeine, a nonselective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonist, is the most widely used psychoactive substance in the world. Evidence demonstrates that caffeine and selective adenosine A2A antagonists interact with the neuronal systems involved in drug reinforcement, locomotor sensitization, and therapeutic effect in Parkinson's disease (PD). Evidence also indicates that low doses of caffeine and a selective adenosine A2A antagonist SCH58261 elicit locomotor stimulation whereas high doses of these drugs exert locomotor inhibition. Since these behavioral and therapeutic effects are mediated by the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways which project to the striatum, we hypothesize that low doses of caffeine and SCH58261 may modulate the functions of dopaminergic neurons in the striatum.MethodsIn this study, we evaluated the neuroadaptations in the striatum by using reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to quantitate the concentrations of striatal dopamine and its metabolites, dihydroxylphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanilic acid (HVA), and using immunoblotting to measure the level of phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) at Ser31, following chronic caffeine and SCH58261 sensitization in mice. Moreover, to validate further that the behavior sensitization of caffeine is through antagonism at the adenosine A2A receptor, we also evaluate whether chronic pretreatment with a selective adenosine A2A antagonist SCH58261 or a selective adenosine A1 antagonist DPCPX can sensitize the locomotor stimulating effects of caffeine.ResultsChronic treatments with low dose caffeine (10 mg/kg) or SCH58261 (2 mg/kg) increased the concentrations of dopamine, DOPAC and HVA, concomitant with increased TH phosphorylation at Ser31 and consequently enhanced TH activity in the striatal tissues in both caffeine- and SCH58261-sensitized mice. In addition, chronic caffeine or SCH58261 administration induced locomotor sensitization, and locomotor cross-sensitization to caffeine was observed following chronic treatment of mice with SCH58261 but not with DPCPX.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that low dosages of caffeine and a selective adenosine A2A antagonist SCH58261 elicited locomotor sensitization and cross-sensitization, which were associated with elevated dopamine concentration and TH phosphorylation at Ser31 in the striatum. Blockade of adenosine A2A receptor may play an important role in the striatal neuroadaptations observed in the caffeine-sensitized and SCH58261-sensitized mice.

Effects of adenosine receptor antagonists on amitriptyline-induced vasodilation in rat isolated aorta

Background. Although we have previously demonstrated the beneficial effects of adenosine receptor antagonists in preventing cardiovascular toxicity of amitriptyline in rats, it is not clear whether adenosine receptors in heart or in vasculature are dominant. The aim of the current study was to investigate the role of adenosine A2a receptors on amitriptyline-induced vasodilation in rat isolated aorta. Methods. After determining EC80 of noradrenalin (NA) (the concentration of noradrenalin that produces 80% of maximal contractile response) as 10−5M, the IC50 value of amitriptyline was measured in rat isolated aorta (the drug concentration causing a half- maximal inhibition of contractile responses to NA); IC50 of amitriptyline was then compared in the presence of the DPCPX (a selective adenosine A1 antagonist), CSC (a selective A2a antagonist) or DMSO (a solvent for adenosine antagonists). Statistical analysis was done using the Student t test. Results. Amitriptyline-inhibited 49.9 ± 3.7 % contractile response to NA on aorta segments at 1.8 × 10−5M (IC50). While DPCPX increased amitriptyline-induced inhibition on contractile response to NA dose dependently, CSC decreased the contractile response to NA only at 10−5M. DMSO did not change amitriptyline-induced IC50. Conclusion. Adenosine A2a receptor stimulation seems to be responsible partly for amitriptyline-induced vasodilation and hypotension since the adenosine A1 antagonist, DPCPX, increased amitriptyline-induced vasodilation in rat isolated aorta.

Altered intravenous pharmacokinetics of topotecan in rats with acute renal failure (ARF) induced by uranyl nitrate: Do adenosine A1 antagonists (selective/non-selective) normalize the altered topotecan kinetics in ARF?

A series of exploratory investigations with multiple agents was carried out in normal rats and in rats with uranyl nitrate-induced acute renal failure to understand the disposition characteristics of intravenous topotecan (TPT) used as a model substrate. The disposition of TPT was unaltered in normal rats when treated with methotrexate, whereas treatment with probenecid increased the systemic exposure of TPT. In case of uranyl nitrate-induced acute renal failure (UN-ARF) rats, the systemic exposure of TPT was increased when compared with normal rats, whereas in UN-ARF rats treated with probenecid a further reduction in renal clearance of TPT was noted as compared with that of UN-ARF induced rats. Thus, TPT may be involved in the tubular secretory pathway when a passive glomerular filtration pathway for elimination was not possible. The disposition of TPT did not normalize in UN-ARF rats when treated with caffeine, a non-selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, whereas the selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist (1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine, DPPX) normalized TPT pharmacokinetic disposition by improving renal function. Renal excretion studies demonstrated that CLR improved by almost fivefold following DPPX treatment in ARF rats. In addition, the qualitative stability/metabolism pattern of TPT in liver microsomes prepared from various groups of rats (normal rats, UN-ARF rats, rats treated with DPPX, and UN-ARF rats treated with DPPX) was found to be similar. In summary, using a pharmacokinetic tool as a surrogate, it has been shown that the pharmacokinetic disposition of TPT improved considerably upon treatment with DPPX, a selective adenosine A1 antagonist.

Do Adenosine Receptors Play a Role in Amitriptyline‐Induced Cardiovascular Toxicity in Rats?

The aim of the our study was to investigate the role of adenosine receptors on cardiovascular toxicity induced by amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant agent. Therefore, the hypothesis of this study was that adenosine receptor antagonists would improve and/or prevent amitriptyline-induced hypotension and conduction abnormalities in an anesthetized rat model of amitriptyline intoxication. Two separate experimental protocols were performed. Amitriptyline intoxication was induced by the infusion of amitriptyline 0.94 mg/kg/min until 40-45% reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP). Sodium cromoglycate (10 mg/kg) was injected i.v. to inhibit the A3 receptor-mediated activation of mast cells. In protocol 1, after amitriptyline infusion, while control animals (n=8) were given dextrose solution, treatment groups received a selective adenosine A1 antagonist DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-Dipropylxanthine, 20 microg/kg/min, n=8) or a selective A2a antagonist CSC (8-(3-chlorostyryl) caffeine, 24 microg/kg/min, n=8) for 60 minutes. In protocol 2, after the sodium cromoglycate, while control group of rats (n=8) recevied a dextrose solution, treatment groups of rats were administered DPCPX (20 microg/kg/min, n=8) or CSC (24 microg/kg/min, n=8) infusion to block adenosine A1 and A2a receptors for 20 minutes before amitriptyline infusion. After pretreatment with adenosine antagonists, all rats were given a dose of 0.94 mg/kg/min of amitriptyline infusion during 60 minutes. Outcome measures were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), QRS duration and survival rate. In protocol 1, amitriptyline infusion significantly reduced MAP and prolonged QRS within 15 minutes. HR was not changed significantly during the experiments. While dextrose did not improve MAP and QRS prolongation, DPCPX or CSC administration developed a significant improvement in MAP compared to the dextrose group within 10 min (88.5 +/- 2.8%, 75.6 +/- 4.7% and 50.1 +/- 14.7%, p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively). Both DPCPX and CSC decreased QRS prolongation (p<0.05) and increased median survival time significantly (log-rank test, p<0.00001). In protocol 2, pretreatment with DPCPX or CSC prevented the reduction in MAP due to amitriptyline toxicity compared to rats administered dextrose infusion (99.5 +/- 2.6%, 102.4 +/- 2.6%, 81.8 +/- 5.4, p<0.01 at 30 min; 98.0 +/- 2.9%, 93.5 +/- 6.0%, 64.9 +/- 4.7, p<0.001, p<0.01 at 40 min, respectively). Pretreatment with DPCPX or CSC also prevented the QRS prolongation (p<0.05) and increased median survival time significantly (log-rank test, p<0.0001). Adenosine antagonists were found to be effective in improving hypotension, QRS prolongation and survival time in our rat model of amitriptyline toxicity. Additionally, amitriptyline-induced cardiotoxicity was abolished by pretreatment with adenosine receptor antagonists. These results suggest that adenosine receptors may have a role in the pathophysiology of amitriptyline-induced cardiovascular toxicity. Adenosine A1 and A2a receptor antagonists may be promising agents for reversing amitriptyline-induced cardiovascular toxicity.

Activation of adenosine A1 receptor attenuates cardiac hypertrophy and prevents heart failure in murine left ventricular pressure-overload model.

Sympathomimetic stimulation, angiotensin II, or endothelin-1 is considered to be an essential stimulus mediating ventricular hypertrophy. Adenosine is known to protect the heart from excessive catecholamine exposure, reduce production of endothelin-1, and attenuate the activation of the renin-angiotensin system. These findings suggest that adenosine may also attenuate myocardial hypertrophy. To verify this hypothesis, we examined whether activation of adenosine receptors can attenuate cardiac hypertrophy and reduce the risk of heart failure. Our in vitro study of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes showed that 2-chloroadenosine (CADO), a stable adenosine analogue, inhibits protein synthesis of cardiomyocytes induced by phenylephrine, endothelin-1, angiotensin II, or isoproterenol, which were mimicked by the stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors. For our in vivo study, cardiac hypertrophy was induced by transverse aortic constriction (TAC) in C57BL/6 male mice. Four weeks after TAC, both heart to body weight ratio (6.80+/-0.18 versus 8.34+/-0.33 mg/g, P<0.0001) as well as lung to body weight ratio (6.23+/-0.27 versus 10.03+/-0.85 mg/g, P<0.0001) became significantly lower in CADO-treated mice than in the TAC group. Left ventricular fractional shortening and left ventricular dP/dtmax were improved significantly by CADO treatment. Similar results were obtained using the selective adenosine A1 agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA). A nonselective adenosine antagonist, 8-(p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline, and a selective adenosine A1 antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, eliminated the antihypertrophic effect of CADO and CPA, respectively. The plasma norepinephrine level was decreased and myocardial expression of regulator of G protein signaling 4 was upregulated in CADO-treated mice. These results indicate that the stimulation of adenosine receptors attenuates both the cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial dysfunction via adenosine A1 receptor-mediated mechanisms.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a novel series of potent, orally active adenosine A1 receptor antagonists with high blood-brain barrier permeability.

A novel series of 3-(2-substituted-3-oxo-2,3-dihydropyridazin-6-yl)-2-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridines (5-38) were synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro adenosine A1 and A(2A) receptor binding activities, and in vitro metabolism by rat liver in order to search for orally active compounds. Most of the test compounds were potent adenosine A1 receptor antagonists with high A1 selectivity and the A1 affinity and A1 selectivity of carbonyl derivatives (5-11) was particularly high. In particular, compound 7 was an extremely potent and selective adenosine A1 antagonist with high A1 selectivity (Ki=0.026 nM, A(2A)/A1=5400). In terms of metabolic stability, 2-oxopropyl (5), 2-hydroxypropyl (12), N-methylacetamide (16), 2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethyl (28) and 1-methylpiperidin-4-yl (32, FR194921) were the most stable compounds in this series of analogues. Further in vivo evaluation indicated that compounds 5, 13, 17, 28 and 32 were detected in both plasma and brain after oral administration in rats. In particular, 32 displayed good plasma and brain concentrations (dose: 32 mg/kg (n=3); after 30 min, plasma conc.=3390+/-651nM, brain conc.=3670+/-496nM; after 60min, plasma conc.=1580+/-348nM, brain conc.=2143+/-434nM), and a good brain/plasma ratio (1.11+/-0.060 (30min), 1.39+/-0.172 (60min)). As a result, we could show that 32 is a good candidate for an orally active adenosine A1 receptor antagonist with high blood-brain barrier permeability and good bioavailability (Ki=6.6nM, A(2A)/A1=820, BA=60.6+/-4.9% (32 mg/kg)).

Exercise in the heat: effects of an adenosine antagonist.

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of an adenosine antagonist on cardiovascular, thermoregulatory, and exercise performance in the heat. Two doses (1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) of a selective adenosine A1 antagonist (1,3-di-n-propyl-8-[4-hydroxyphenyll]xanthine) (DPHPX) were tested in a rat model of exercise exhaustion, treadmill 11 m/min, 6 degrees incline, in the heat 30 degrees C. Pretreatment with the experimental adenosine antagonist caused a slight improvement p > 0.05 in run time (41+/-4 vs. 44+/-3 mm) at a low dose but reduced performance (41+/-4 vs. 29+/-3 mm) at a high dose despite elevated plasma lactate (6.41+/-0.82 vs. 9.91+/-1.0 and 12.42+/-1.1 micromole/L) levels in both dosage groups. At the low dose the antagonist provided a clear benefit in thermoregulation as evidenced by reduced heating rates (0.079+/-0.005 vs. 0.050+/-0.009 degrees C/min). Heart rate and blood pressure tended to be preserved in the low dose group also. Blood gases remained closer to normal with either dosage of drug with arterial PO2 being remarkably preserved after exercise whereas venous PO2 was not different suggesting increased oxygen delivery and extraction. The results of this investigation indicate that antagonizing the effects of adenosine at a low dose with this agent did improve cardiovascular and thermoregulatory responses but did not provide a substantial overall benefit in exercise performance in the heat.

Fentanyl protects the heart against ischaemic injury via opioid receptors, adenosine A1 receptors and KATP channel linked mechanisms in rats

We have investigated if fentanyl protects against myocardial ischaemic injury and if so, if the mechanism of this protection is mediated via opioid and adenosine A1 receptors, and KATP channels. Langendorff rat hearts were subjected to global ischaemia (30 min) and reperfusion (60 min). The drugs were administered before induction of ischaemia and maintained throughout the experiment. Treatment with fentanyl 740 nmol litre-1 improved post-ischaemic mechanical function, assessed as developed pressure, +dP/dtmax and -dP/dtmin, compared with controls after 60 min of reperfusion. These effects were abolished by naloxone 1 mumol litre-1, DPCPX 10 mumol litre-1, a selective adenosine A1 antagonist and sodium 5-hydroxydecanoate 100 mumol litre-1, a K+ATP channel blocker. We conclude that fentanyl protected the heart against post-ischaemic injury by a mechanism which was blocked by an opioid and an adenosine A1 receptor antagonist and also by a KATP channel antagonist.

Selective adenosine antagonists for mapping central nervous system adenosine receptors with positron emission tomography: Carbon-11 labeled KF15372 (A1) and KF17837 (A2A)

During the past decade, many neuroreceptors in humans and other animals have been visualized in vivo by positron emission tomography (PET) with corresponding radioligands. Because adenosine is a neuromodulator, PET assessment of the adenosine receptor system offers us an opportunity to understand the neurotransmission system in general. The 11C-labeled selective adenosine A1 antagonists KF15372 ([3-propyl-11C]8-dicyclopropylmethyl-1, 3-dipropylxanthine) and a 11C-methyl derivative [11C]KF26345 and selective adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 ([7-methyl-11C]-(E)-8-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)-1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine) and KF18446 ([7-methyl-11C]-(E)-8-3,4,5-trimethoxystyryl)-1,3,7-trimethylxanthine were evaluated in vivo as potential PET ligands for mapping CNS adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. [11C]KF15372 and [11C]KF263345: Tissue sampling and ex vivo autoradiography (ARG) suggest that the regional brain distribution of [11C]KF15372 and [11C]KF26345 is consistent with that of the adenosine A1 receptors found in mice and rats. The brain uptake was competitively reduced by the coadministration of A1, but not by A2A antagonists. The ex vivo ARG on the rat model with unilateral orbital enucleation, visualized the A1 receptor deficiency in the presynaptic terminals. PET with these ligands visualized the A1 receptors in the monkey and cat brain. [11C]KF17837 and [11C]KF18446: In mice, a high uptake of two ligands was found in the striatum in which A2A receptors are highly enriched. The uptake was decreased by coinjection of carrier KF17837 or other xanthine-type A2A antagonists, but not by four nonxanthine-type A2A antagonists or A1 antagonists. In the rat brain, ex vivo ARG showed the A2A receptor-specific uptake of two ligands in the striatum. In PET studies of the monkey and cat brain, the A2A receptors in the striatum was clearly visualized. These pieces of evidence demonstrated the potential of 11C-labeled selective xanthine-type adenosine antagonists as PET ligands for mapping CNS adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Drug Dev. Res. 45:312–323, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Renal adenosine A1 receptor binding characteristics and mRNA levels during the development of acute renal failure in the rat.

1. The binding characteristics and mRNA levels for renal adenosine A1 receptors were investigated in normal rats and rats with acute renal failure (ARF) induced by either glycerol or HgCl2. 2. Saturation isotherms determined from the binding of [3H]-1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]-DPCPX), a selective adenosine A1 antagonist, to renal membranes of untreated rats gave values of 0.62 nM for the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) and 19.9 fmol mg-1 protein for the density of binding sites (Bmax). No saturable binding was observed with [3H]-2-(p-(carboxylethyl)-phenylethylamino)-5'-N-ethylcar box amido adenosine ([3H]-CGS 21680), a selective adenosine A2a agonist. 3. By contrast to time-matched controls, renal membranes obtained from rats 16 and 48 h following the induction of ARF with glycerol, showed statistically significant increases (2-4 fold) in both Bmax and Kd for the binding of [3H]-DPCPX. No significant changes in the binding characteristics of [3H]-DPCPX were noted with membranes from rats 48 h following the production of ARF with HgCl2. 4. Adenosine A1 receptor mRNA levels were significantly elevated 0.5, 16 and 48 h following induction of ARF with glycerol, whilst no change was noted in mRNA levels for beta-actin at the same time points. No statistically significant changes in adenosine A1 receptor or beta-actin mRNA levels were noted 48 h after the induction of ARF with HgCl2. 5. This study indicates that glycerol-induced ARF in the rat is associated with an increase in renal adenosine A1 receptor density which appears to result from increased transcription of the gene for this receptor. An increase in adenosine A1 receptor density in renal resistance vessels may explain, at least in part, the enhanced renal vasoconstrictor response to adenosine in glycerol-induced ARF that was noted in a previous study.

Adenosine A1 and A2 receptors modulate extracellular dopamine levels in rat striatum

To clarify differences in the operating mechanisms of adenosine receptor subtypes (A1 and A2), striatal extracellular dopamine levels under various conditions were determined by in vivo microdialysis. Adenosine (50 μM) as well as the selective A1 agonist, 2-chloro- N 6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA; 1 μM) decreased striatal extracellular dopamine levels, while the selective adenosine A1 antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxantine (CPT; 50 μM) and caffeine (100 μM) increased striatal extracellular dopamine levels. A selective A2a agonist, 2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino]-5′- N-ethylcarboxamideadenosine (CGS21680; 10 μM), a selective A2 agonist, N 6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(methylphenyl)ethyl]adenosine (DPMA; 5 μM) and a selective A2 antagonist, 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX; 10 μM), did not affect extracellular dopamine levels. When the A1 receptor was blocked by CPT, extracellular dopamine levels were increased by adenosine and DPMA, decreased by caffeine as well as DMPX, and unaffected by CGS21680. These results indicate that the stimulatory effects of the A2 receptor on striatal extracellular dopamine levels are masked by the inhibitory effects of the A1 receptor.

Role of brainstem adenosine A1 receptors in the cardiovascular response to hypothalamic defence area stimulation in the anaesthetized rat.

1. The role of centrally located adenosine A1 receptors in the cardiovascular changes associated with the hypothalamic defence response has been investigated by in vitro autoradiography and the intraventricular application of an A1 receptor antagonist. 2. 8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a highly selective adenosine A1 antagonist and its vehicle, ethanol, were administered directly into the posterior portion of the fourth ventricle of alpha-chloralose anaesthetized, paralysed and artificially ventilated rats. 3. DPCPX (0.01 to 0.3 mg kg-1) caused a dose-dependent decrease in the magnitude of the evoked pressor response (from -13 to -23 mmHg) elicited on hypothalamic defence area stimulation at a dose 10 fold lower than that required to produce an equivalent effect following systemic administration whilst ethanol, the vehicle, had no effect. 4. In vitro autoradiography revealed a heterogeneous distribution of adenosine A1 binding sites in the lower brainstem of rats. Image analysis showed the ventrolateral medulla to have the highest density of A1 receptors. Intermediate levels of binding were seen in caudal regions of the nucleus tractus solitarii and the hypoglossal nucleus. 5. These data imply that a proportion of the cardiovascular response to hypothalamic defence area stimulation are produced by the activation of adenosine A1 receptors localized close to the surface of, or adjacent to, the fourth ventricle in the immediate vicinity of the injection site.

Modulation of vasodilatation to levcromakalim by adenosine analogues in the rabbit ear: an explanation for hypoxic augmentation

1. We have used a rabbit isolated ear, buffered-perfused preparation to investigate the effects of adenosine analogues on the vasodilatation to the potassium channel opener, levcromakalim (the active (-)-enantiomer of cromakalim). We have examined the effects of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective adenosine A1 antagonist, on vasodilatation to levcromakalim under hypoxic conditions and also following inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis. 2. Levcromakalim relaxed preconstricted preparations with an EC50 = 369 +/- 48 nM and maximum relaxation of tone (Rmax) = 81.0 +/- 3.2%. In the presence of 1 microM N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) a selective adenosine A1 agonist, there was a significant (P < 0.01) leftward shift in the concentration-response curve with an EC50 = 194 +/- 54 nM and Rmax = 93.2 +/- 2.0%. Conversely, the presence of CHA did not influence vasodilatation to either pinacidil or sodium nitroprusside. 3. Hypoxia also significantly (P < 0.001) increased the vasodilator potency of levcromakalim (EC50 = 134 +/- 22 nM), and this enhancement was completely reversed (EC50 = 380 +/- 107 nM, P < 0.01) by pretreatment of the preparations with 5 microM DPCPX, a selective A1 adenosine antagonist. However, under normoxic conditions DPCPX did not influence vasodilatation to levcromakalim. 4. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis with 100 microM NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) caused a significant (P < 0.001) leftward shift in the concentration-response curve to levcromakalim (EC50 = 73.0 +/- 7.6 nM). Pretreatment of preparations with DPCPX partially reversed the increase in potency found in the absence of nitric oxide synthesis (EC50 = 153 +/- 18 nM, P < 0.001). 5. We have shown that an adenosine Al agonist may increase the potency of levcromakalim indicating that adenosine receptor activation may augment the vasodilator activity of levcromakalim. That responses to levcromakalim but not those to pinacidil were affected by CHA points to further differences in the pharmacology of these potassium channel openers. The reversal by the adenosine Al antagonist of the hypoxic-potentiation of vasodilatation to levcromakalim, and also augmentation following inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis, suggests that under these conditions there is an endogenous release of adenosine which may enhance responses to levcromakalim. The findings of this study suggest that levcromakalim may selectively dilate vessels where there is elevated adenosine release.

Xanthines with C8 chiral substituents as potent and selective adenosine A1 antagonists.

Several 8-substituted 1,3-dipropylxanthines were synthesized, and their receptor binding affinities at adenosine A1 and A2 receptors were measured. When enantiomeric pairs of compounds were examined, the R enantiomers were significantly more potent than the corresponding S enantiomers. The most potent compound at the A1 receptor was (R)-3,7-dihydro-8-(1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purine-2,6-di one (5a; MDL 102,503), whose Ki value at the A1 receptor was 6.9 nM. However, a more selective compound was (R)-3,7-dihydro-8-(1-phenylpropyl)-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purine-2,6-dione (5d; MDL 102,234), which had a Ki value of 23.2 nM at the A1 receptor and an A2/A1 ratio of 153.

Adenosine A1 antagonists. 3. Structure-activity relationships on amelioration against scopolamine- or N6-((R)-phenylisopropyl)adenosine-induced cognitive disturbance.

The effects of a variety of adenosine A1 and A2 antagonists on N6-((R)-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA)- and scopolamine-induced amnesias were investigated in rodents in order to clarify the role of adenosine receptors in learning and memory. Some of the selective adenosine A1 antagonists exhibited antiamnesic activities at several doses where they did not induce an increase of spontaneous locomotion. These results suggest that the blockade of A1 receptors is more important than that of A2 receptors in learning and memory. Detailed studies of structure-activity relationships of adenosine A1 antagonists in two amnesia models demonstrated that there were three types of adenosine A1 antagonists: (A) Compounds 3-5 (8-substituted 1,3-dipropylxanthines) ameliorated the shortened latency in both models. (B) Compounds 7-11 (8-substituted 1,3-dialkylxanthines) and 19-21 (imidazo[2,1-i]purin-5(4H)-one derivatives) ameliorated the shortened latency in the (R)-PIA-induced amnesia model but not in the scopolamine-induced amnesia model. (C) Compounds 14-16 ameliorated the shortened latency in the scopolamine model but not in the (R)-PIA model. Aminophenethyl-substituted compounds C did not exhibit adenosine A1 antagonism in vivo presumably due to rapid metabolism. The dramatic change in the activities of A and B could not be explained by their simple pharmacokinetic differences because both types of compounds showed clear blockade of central adenosine A1 receptors in the (R)-PIA model. 8-(3-Dicyclopropylmethyl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine (5) (KF15372) was chosen for further studies and is currently under preclinical development as a cognition enhancer.

Selective A1-Antagonists for Treatment of Cognitive Deficits

Abstract A novel compound, KFM 19, is introduced, which turned out to be a selective adenosine A1-antagonist with good bioavailability. Its pharmacological profile suggests a high therapeutic potential for dementia and related cognitive deficits.