The analysis of human perception of vibrations in buildings is a critical aspect of structural engineering, particularly as urbanization intensifies and the proximity of vibration sources to buildings increases. This paper addresses the frequent errors in the assessment and diagnosis of the impact of vibrations on building occupants. Despite stringent standards and detailed methodologies, misinterpretations and incorrect implementations of these guidelines are common, leading to flawed diagnostic studies. These errors often stem from the misuse of measurement equipment, inappropriate selection of measurement points, and a general lack of comprehensive education on vibration analysis. National guidelines, although largely based on ISO standards, vary significantly, contributing to inconsistent practices across Europe. The dominant sources of urban vibrations include vehicle traffic, particularly heavy trucks and rail vehicles, which significantly impact both building structures and human comfort. This paper reviews the methodologies for measuring and interpreting vibrations, emphasizing the importance of correct sensor placement and data analysis. It highlights the necessity of integrating vibrational comfort into building design, considering both external and internal vibration sources. The study also explores the effectiveness of different evaluation methods, such as the RMS and VDV methods, and the impact of various weighting functions on the analysis results. The findings underscore the need for improved education and standardization in the field to ensure accurate assessments and enhance the vibrational comfort of building occupants.
Read full abstract