Selection Of Imaging Modalities Research Articles

Thymic Imaging Pitfalls and Strategies for Optimized Diagnosis.

Thymic imaging is challenging because the imaging appearance of a variety of benign and malignant thymic conditions are similar. CT is the most commonly used modality for mediastinal imaging, while MRI and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT are helpful when they are tailored to the correct indication. Each of these imaging modalities has limitations and technical pitfalls that may lead to an incorrect diagnosis and mismanagement. CT may not be sufficient for the characterization of cystic thymic processes and differentiation between thymic hyperplasia and thymic tumors. MRI can be used to overcome these limitations but is subject to other potential pitfalls such as an equivocal decrease in signal intensity at chemical shift imaging, size limitations, unusual signal intensity for cysts, subtraction artifacts, pseudonodularity on T2-weighted MR images, early imaging misinterpretation, flow and spatial resolution issues hampering assessment of local invasion, and the overlap of apparent diffusion coefficients between malignant and benign thymic entities. FDG PET/CT is not routinely indicated due to some overlap in FDG uptake between thymomas and benign thymic processes. However, it is useful for staging and follow-up of aggressive tumors (eg, thymic carcinoma), particularly for detection of occult metastatic disease. Pitfalls in imaging after treatment of thymic malignancies relate to technical challenges such as postthymectomy sternotomy streak metal artifacts, differentiation of postsurgical thymic bed changes from tumor recurrence, or human error with typical "blind spots" for identification of metastatic disease. Understanding these pitfalls enables appropriate selection of imaging modalities, improves diagnostic accuracy, and guides patient treatment. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US

BackgroundThere are limited data on the impact of imaging modality selection for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk on downstream resource utilisation. This study sought to identify differences between patient populations in the US undergoing stress echocardiography, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), positron emission tomography (PET) MPI, and coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) for the assessment of CAD risk, and associated physician referral patterns.MethodsClaims and electronic health records data for 2.5 million US patients who received stress echocardiography, cCTA, SPECT MPI or PET MPI between January 2016 and March 2018, from the Decision Resources Group Real-World Evidence US Data Repository, were analysed. Patients were stratified into suspected and existing CAD cohorts, and further stratified by pre-test risk and presence and recency of interventions or acute cardiac events (within 1–2 years pre-index test). Linear and logistic regression were used to compare numeric and categorical variables.ResultsPhysicians were more likely to refer patients to standalone SPECT MPI (77%) and stress echocardiography (18%) than PET MPI (3%) and cCTA (2%). Overall, 43% of physicians referred more than 90% of their patients to standalone SPECT MPI. Just 3%, 1% and 1% of physicians referred more than 90% of their patients to stress echocardiography, PET MPI or cCTA. At the aggregated imaging level, patients who underwent stress echocardiography or cCTA had similar comorbidity profiles. Comorbidity profiles were also similar for patients who underwent SPECT MPI and PET MPI.ConclusionMost patients underwent SPECT MPI at the index date, with very few undergoing PET MPI or cCTA. Patients who underwent cCTA at the index date were more likely to undergo additional imaging tests compared with those who underwent other imaging modalities. Further evidence is needed to understand factors influencing imaging test selection across patient populations.

Projected lifetime cancer risk for patients undergoing spine surgery for isthmic spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXTRadiographs, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography (CT) are increasingly utilized in the diagnosis and management of various spine pathologies. Such modalities utilize ionizing radiation, a known cause of carcinogenesis. While the radiation doses such studies confer has been investigated previously, it is less clear how such doses translate to projected cancer risks, which may be a more interpretable metric. PURPOSE(1) Calculate the lifetime cancer risk and the relative contributions of preference-sensitive selection of imaging modalities associated with the surgical management of a common spine pathology, isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS); (2) Investigate whether the use of intraoperative CT, which is being more pervasively adopted, increases the risk of cancer. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective cross-sectional study carried out within a large integrated health care network. PATIENT SAMPLEAdult patients who underwent surgical treatment of IS via lumbar fusion from January 2016 through December 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES(1) Effective radiation dose and lifetime cancer risk associated with each exposure to ionizing radiation; (2) Difference in effective radiation dose (and lifetime cancer risk) among patients who received intraoperative CT compared to other intraoperative imaging techniques. METHODSBaseline demographics and differences in surgical techniques were characterized. Radiation exposure data were collected from the 2-year period centered on the operative date. Projected risk of cancer from this radiation was calculated utilizing each patient's effective radiation dose in combination with age and sex. Generalized linear modeling was used to adjust for covariates when determining the comparative risk of intraoperative CT as compared to alternative imaging modalities. RESULTSWe included 151 patients in this cohort. The range in calculated cancer risk exclusively from IS management was 1.3-13 cases of cancer per 1,000 patients. During the intraoperative period, CT imaging was found to significantly increase radiation exposure as compared to alternate imaging modalities (adjusted risk difference (ARD) 12.33mSv; IQR 10.04, 14.63mSv; p<.001). For a standardized 40 to 49-year-old female, this projects to an additional 0.72 cases of cancer per 1,000. For the entire 2-year perioperative care episode, intraoperative CT as compared to other intraoperative imaging techniques was not found to increase total ionizing radiation exposure (ARD 9.49mSv; IQR -0.83, 19.81mSv; p=.072). The effect of intraoperative imaging choice was mitigated in part due to preoperative (ARD 13.1mSv, p<.001) and postoperative CTs (ARD 22.7mSv, p<.001). CONCLUSIONSPreference-sensitive imaging decisions in the treatment of IS impart substantial cancer risk. Important drivers of radiation exposure exist in each phase of care, including intraoperative CT and/or CT scans during the perioperative period. Knowledge of these data warrant re-evaluation of current imaging protocols and suggest a need for the development of radiation-sensitive approaches to perioperative imaging.

Imaging the Cerebral Veins in Pediatric Patients: Beyond Dural Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

The range of intracranial venous anomalies in children differs from that in adults. As a commonly encountered highly morbid disease, sinovenous thrombosis has been discussed extensively in the literature, and the associated imaging considerations are similar in pediatric and adult patients. The authors shift the focus to less frequently discussed cerebral venous diseases in pediatric patients. First, the practical embryology pertinent to malformations, syndromes, and variants such as vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation, Sturge-Weber syndrome, and developmental venous anomalies are discussed. Second, anatomic considerations that are applicable to neuroimaging in pediatric patients with cerebral venous anomalies are reviewed. In the discussion of anatomy, special attention is given to the medullary venous system that serves the cerebral white matter, superficial cortical veins (tributaries of the dural venous sinuses), and bridging veins, which carry blood from the superficial cortical veins through the potential subdural space into the dural venous sinuses. Third, the selection of imaging modalities (US, CT and CT venography, and MRI) is addressed, and various MR venographic pulse sequences (time-of-flight, phase-contrast, and contrast-enhanced sequences) are compared. Finally, a broad variety of congenital and acquired superficial and deep venous diseases in children are reviewed, with emphasis on less frequently discussed entities involving the medullary (eg, deep medullary venous engorgement and thrombosis, periventricular hemorrhagic venous infarction due to germinal matrix hemorrhage), cortical (eg, cortical venous thrombosis), and bridging (eg, acute and chronic manifestations of injury in abusive head trauma) veins, as well as the deep veins and dural venous sinuses (eg, varix). © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

Empowering drug development: Leveraging insights from imaging technologies to enable the advancement of digitalhealth technologies.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has publicly recognized the importance of improving drug development efficiency, deeming translational biomarkers a top priority. The use of imaging biomarkers has been associated with increased rates of drug approvals. An appropriate level of validation provides a pragmatic way to choose and implement these biomarkers. Standardizing imaging modality selection, data acquisition protocols, and image analysis (in ways that are agnostic to equipment and algorithms) have been key to imaging biomarker deployment. The best known examples come from studies done via precompetitive collaboration efforts, which enable input from multiple stakeholders and data sharing. Digital health technologies (DHTs) provide an opportunity to measure meaningful aspects of patient health, including patient function, for extended periods of time outside of the hospital walls, with objective, sensor-based measures. We identified the areas where learnings from the imaging biomarker field can accelerate the adoption and widespread use of DHTs to develop novel treatments. As with imaging, technical validation parameters and performance acceptance thresholds need to be established. Approaches amenable to multiple hardware options and data processing algorithms can be enabled by sharing DHT data and by cross-validating algorithms. Data standardization and creation of shared databases will be vital. Pre-competitive consortia (public-private partnerships and professional societies that bring together all stakeholders, including patient organizations, industry, academic experts, and regulators) will advance the regulatory maturity of DHTs in clinical trials.

The diagnosis and management of suspected lymphoma in general practice.

With rapid advancements in diagnosis and treatment of malignancies, the gap between generalists and subspecialists continues to widen, particularly in cancers like lymphoma where the spectrum of disease varies from indolent to rapidly progressive. Prior to establishing with a hematologist/oncologist, patients must be accurately and comprehensively diagnosed and managed for lymphoma in the generalist setting. In the following manuscript, we review the common clinical presentations in which should raise concern for lymphoma. We summarize the literature regarding the role of laboratory studies including complete blood count and peripheral blood flow cytometry, the recommendations for lymph node sampling, the role and selection of imaging modalities, and ideal patient monitoring for high-risk clinical syndromes that may be encountered in lymphoma.

Radiology residency training during the COVID-19 pandemic : Conception and evaluation of a three-phase online-based teaching concept

Kontaktbeschränkungen und Abstandsregeln haben die klinische Weiterbildung vor große Herausforderungen gestellt. Innovative und interaktive Konzepte sind notwendig, um die Weiterbildung auch in Zeiten von Corona aufrechtzuerhalten. In der aktuellen Literatur sind Lehrkonzepte für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in der Facharztweiterbildung jedoch unterrepräsentiert. In dieser Arbeit wird ein onlinebasiertes Fortbildungskonzept in der Radiologie vorgestellt, das die klassische Fallvorstellung in ein dreiphasiges, interaktives Lernmodell umgestaltet. Dieses besteht aus einer selbstständigen Fallbearbeitung mit Anknüpfung an bestehendes Wissen, gefolgt von einer Falldiskussion und gezielten Fragen sowie Feedback durch die teilnehmenden Oberärztinnen und Oberärzte. Nach 12 Monaten erfolgte eine fragebogenbasierte Evaluation durch die Weiterbildungsassistentinnen und -assistenten. Hierbei zeigte sich, dass eine deutliche Mehrheit der Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer das Fortbildungskonzept positiv hinsichtlich seines Schweregrades, der Repräsentativität für die klinische Tätigkeit sowie der Relevanz für den Facharzt bewerteten. Ebenso ergaben sich Erkenntnisse hinsichtlich der zukünftigen Gestaltung des Konzepts in Bezug auf Dauer, Modalität der zu besprechenden Bildgebungsverfahren und Häufigkeit. Alle Befragten gaben an, vom Format profitiert zu haben. Onlinebasierte Fortbildungskonzepte können demnach einen relevanten Beitrag zur Weiterbildung von Assistenzärztinnen und -ärzten leisten und stellen eine adäquate Alternative bzw. Erweiterung analoger Fortbildungskonzepte dar.

A 13-year-old boy with strangulation of the floating gallbladder by the lesser omentum

The selection of imaging modality is important in emergency departments because symptoms in children are usually unclear. In children with abdominal pain, differential diagnosis ranges from common diseases to rare entities requiring surgical therapy. Unremarkable findings on routine investigation, such as laboratory tests and plain radiographs, cannot rule out the surgical entities. Close observation and, if needed, further imaging tests are necessary in emergency departments or even in wards for children with recurrent or worsening abdominal pain. We report a rare case of a 13-year-old boy with strangulation of the floating gallbladder by the lesser omentum. This article features the imaging findings of the rare surgical entity.

Imaging Modality Selection in Cardiac Ablation.

Catheter ablation as a treatment method for both ventricular and atrial arrhythmias has evolved significantly over the past 40 years since it was first performed in humans. This evolution has been paralleled by a similar expansion in both invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities directed at further elucidating cardiac morphology and arrhythmia substrate pathophysiology. Access to multimodality imaging options is a significant piece of the armamentarium available to interventional electrophysiologists who are tackling increasingly complex rhythm problems with catheter ablation. This presents a unique problem to the practicing electrophysiologist in selecting the most pertinent imaging modalities that will improve the safety and efficacy of a procedure and winnowing out potential imaging studies that offer minimal or marginal benefit. In this review, we evaluate the various modalities that are useful in planning and executing successful ablation and weigh the evidence for benefit.

State-of-the-art review of lung imaging in cystic fibrosis with recommendations for pulmonologists and radiologists from the "iMAging managEment of cySTic fibROsis" (MAESTRO) consortium.

Imaging represents an important noninvasive means to assess cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease, which remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality in CF patients. While the development of new imaging techniques has revolutionised clinical practice, advances have posed diagnostic and monitoring challenges. The authors aim to summarise these challenges and make evidence-based recommendations regarding imaging assessment for both clinicians and radiologists. A committee of 21 experts in CF from the 10 largest specialist centres in Italy was convened, including a radiologist and a pulmonologist from each centre, with the overall aim of developing clear and actionable recommendations for lung imaging in CF. An a priori threshold of at least 80% of the votes was required for acceptance of each statement of recommendation. After a systematic review of the relevant literature, the committee convened to evaluate 167 articles. Following five RAND conferences, consensus statements were developed by an executive subcommittee. The entire consensus committee voted and approved 28 main statements. There is a need for international guidelines regarding the appropriate timing and selection of imaging modality for patients with CF lung disease; timing and selection depends upon the clinical scenario, the patient's age, lung function and type of treatment. Despite its ubiquity, the use of the chest radiograph remains controversial. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging should be routinely used to monitor CF lung disease. Future studies should focus on imaging protocol harmonisation both for computed tomography and for magnetic resonance imaging. The introduction of artificial intelligence imaging analysis may further revolutionise clinical practice by providing fast and reliable quantitative outcomes to assess disease status. To date, there is no evidence supporting the use of lung ultrasound to monitor CF lung disease.

MRI is the most commonly used imaging modality for HCC screening at a tertiary care transplant center.

In this study, we describe the patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening with imaging and factors associated with imaging modality selection in a tertiary care transplant center. This was a retrospective study where all adult patients with cirrhosis and/or chronic hepatitis B virus infection referred for HCC screening with ultrasound (US), CT or MRI were identified during 2017. The association between imaging methods, demographic/clinical data were analyzed by uni- and multivariate analysis. A total of 1437 patients were included (median age 61y, 59% male, median BMI 27.5kg/m2, median AFP 3.4ng/mL, 37% with HCV and 87% with cirrhosis). Index screening imaging method utilization included MRI (51%), US (33%) and CT (16%). Use of US as the index imaging modality for screening was significantly associated with race/ethnicity [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.71-2.01, all p < 0.05] in multivariate analysis. Presence of cirrhosis (OR 0.29, p < 0.001) and referral by a hepatologist (OR 0.23, p < 0.001) were associated with screening with MRI in the multivariate analysis; while gender, age, BMI, etiology and income at ZIP code of residence were not significantly associated with imaging modality selection. HCC was observed in 62 patients (prevalence 4.3%). Rate of HCC detection was significantly higher with MRI vs US (5.9% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.001). MRI was the most frequently used modality (> 50%) for HCC screening in our tertiary care center, in contrast with the current practice guidelines. Race/ethnicity, cirrhosis and referral by a hepatologist were associated with the imaging method used for HCC screening.

Editors' Note: Association of Initial Imaging Modality and Futile Recanalization After Thrombectomy

In “Association of Initial Imaging Modality and Futile Recanalization After Thrombectomy,” Meinel et al. reported that the rate of futile recanalization (defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 4–6 despite successful recanalization) among patients enrolled in the BEYOND-SWIFT multicenter, retrospective observational registry was significantly higher in patients selected for thrombectomy based on a CT scan as compared with patients selected for thrombectomy based on an MRI. Siegler and Thon cautioned that these findings should not dissuade against (1) use of a CT scan to determine eligibility for thrombectomy because this could lead to unnecessary delays in care or (2) performance of thrombectomy after CT scans because the imaging modality itself does not directly affect outcome and 40% of patients selected for thrombectomy based on a CT scan had a good 90-day mRS score (which represents a 22%–27% absolute increase compared with patients treated with medical management in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials). Meinel et al agreed that it is imperative to avoid delays before thrombectomy and reinforced that their findings should not influence the selection of imaging modality for potential thrombectomy candidates. They also pointed out that implementation of high-speed MRI protocols should be considered to obtain more detailed information than a CT scan can provide while avoiding lengthy delays between imaging and groin puncture. In “Association of Initial Imaging Modality and Futile Recanalization After Thrombectomy,” Meinel et al. reported that the rate of futile recanalization (defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 4–6 despite successful recanalization) among patients enrolled in the BEYOND-SWIFT multicenter, retrospective observational registry was significantly higher in patients selected for thrombectomy based on a CT scan as compared with patients selected for thrombectomy based on an MRI. Siegler and Thon cautioned that these findings should not dissuade against (1) use of a CT scan to determine eligibility for thrombectomy because this could lead to unnecessary delays in care or (2) performance of thrombectomy after CT scans because the imaging modality itself does not directly affect outcome and 40% of patients selected for thrombectomy based on a CT scan had a good 90-day mRS score (which represents a 22%–27% absolute increase compared with patients treated with medical management in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials). Meinel et al agreed that it is imperative to avoid delays before thrombectomy and reinforced that their findings should not influence the selection of imaging modality for potential thrombectomy candidates. They also pointed out that implementation of high-speed MRI protocols should be considered to obtain more detailed information than a CT scan can provide while avoiding lengthy delays between imaging and groin puncture.

Do various imaging modalities provide potential early detection and diagnosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw? A review.

Patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) often visit their dentists at advanced stages and subsequently require treatments that greatly affect quality of life. Currently, no clear diagnostic criteria exist to assess MRONJ, and the definitive diagnosis solely relies on clinical bone exposure. This ambiguity leads to a diagnostic delay, complications, and unnecessary burden. This article aims to identify imaging modalities' usage and findings of MRONJ to provide possible approaches for early detection. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to review all diagnostic imaging modalities for MRONJ. Panoramic radiography offers a fundamental understanding of the lesions. Imaging findings were comparable between non-exposed and exposed MRONJ, showing osteolysis, osteosclerosis, and thickened lamina dura. Mandibular cortex index Class II could be a potential early MRONJ indicator. While three-dimensional modalities, CT and CBCT, were able to show more features unique to MRONJ such as a solid type periosteal reaction, buccal predominance of cortical perforation, and bone-within-bone appearance. MRI signal intensities of vital bones are hypointense on T1WI and hyperintense on T2WI and STIR when necrotic bone shows hypointensity on all T1WI, T2WI, and STIR. Functional imaging is the most sensitive method but is usually performed in metastasis detection rather than being a diagnostic tool for early MRONJ. Currently, MRONJ-specific imaging features cannot be firmly established. However, the current data are valuable as it may lead to a more efficient diagnostic procedure along with a more suitable selection of imaging modalities.

Design of the Japanese Comprehensive Health-Economic Assessment for Appropriate Cardiac Imaging Strategy Including Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Study (J-CONCIOUS).

Background: The evaluation of stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) has evolved, and contemporary clinical practice guidelines emphasize the importance of in-depth consideration of procedure indications, risk stratification, and results of non-invasive imaging tests. However, little is known about the appropriate selection of imaging modalities for ischemia evaluation and the comparative cost-effectiveness in real-world clinical practice.Methods and Results: The Japanese Comprehensive Health-Economic Assessment for Appropriate Cardiac Imaging Strategy including Outcome and cost-effectiveness in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Study (J-CONCIOUS), a multicenter observational study, was designed to prospectively enroll 2,500 patients with suspected or known SCAD, register clinical information and administrative records, and follow patients for 3 years. Any diagnostic or cardiac imaging modality (including stress tests using electrocardiography, echocardiography, or myocardial perfusion imaging; coronary computed tomographic angiography; and/or invasive coronary angiography with or without fractional flow reserve assessment) is acceptable. Clinical endpoints, such as all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and non-fatal myocardial infarction, will be obtained, along with quality of life assessment using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. The cost-effectiveness of individual assessment patterns will be quantified by analysis of Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) data, and quality-adjusted life years and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated.Conclusions: J-CONCIOUS is expected to establish a risk-based and cost-effective imaging strategy for the detection and evaluation of functional myocardial ischemia and/or anatomical coronary imaging in Japan.

The Association between Choice of Diagnostic Imaging Modality and Long-term Treatment Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment on Maxillary First Molars

IntroductionRadiography has played a fundamental role in the advancement of nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT), allowing for more accurate diagnosis and treatment. Typically, providers choose to perform NSRCT using periapical (PA) radiographs alone or, often in more difficult cases, in conjunction with cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of NSRCT based on imaging modality selection for the initial treatment of maxillary first molars. MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted using 1385 cases of NSRCT on maxillary first molars. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics and treatment outcomes. Based on the imaging modality used, patients were stratified into 2 groups (PA radiographs alone or PA radiographs + CBCT imaging). Those who required additional treatment(s) after the completion of NSRCT were classified as having “posttreatment disease.” Statistical analysis was performed to assess the differences between groups. ResultsAfter the completion of primary endodontic therapy, 5.8% (n = 81) of the entire sample had posttreatment disease. CBCT imaging was used in 13.4% (n = 185) of NSRCTs. Although not significant, cases that were difficult enough to require the use of CBCT imaging had a higher rate of posttreatment disease compared to those that could be completed with PA radiographs alone (8.6% vs 5.4%, P > .05). Results from a multivariable logistic regression model showed that the need for CBCT imaging had a nonsignificant positive association with posttreatment disease (P > .05). ConclusionsThe decision to use CBCT imaging appears to serve as a proxy for case complexity and the associated increase in risk of posttreatment disease. This is important to keep in mind when assessing treatment prognosis.

Imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: ultrasound, radiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) describes a broad spectrum of developmental abnormalities of the hip joint that are traditionally diagnosed during infancy. Because the development of the hip joint is a dynamic process, optimal treatment depends not only on the severity of the dysplasia, but also on the age of the child. Various imaging modalities are routinely used to confirm suspected diagnosis, to assess severity, and to monitor treatment response. For infants younger than 4months, screening hip ultrasound (US) is recommended only for those with risk factors, equivocal or positive exam findings, whereas for infants older than 4-6months, pelvis radiography is preferred. Following surgical hip reduction, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is preferred over computed tomography (CT) because MR can not only confirm concentric hip joint reduction, but also identify the presence of soft-tissue barriers to reduction and any unexpected postoperative complications. The routine use of contrast-enhanced MR remains controversial because of the relative paucity of well-powered and validated literature. The main objectives of this article are to review the normal and abnormal developmental anatomy of the hip joint, to discuss the rationale behind the current recommendations on the most appropriate selection of imaging modalities for screening and diagnosis, and to review routine and uncommon findings that can be identified on post-reduction MR, using an evidence-based approach. A basic understanding of the physiology and the pathophysiology can help ensure the selection of optimal imaging modality and reduce equivocal diagnoses that can lead to unnecessary treatment.

Oral cancer imaging: the principles of interpretation on dental radiograph, CT, CBCT, MRI, and USG

Oral cancer is a malignant neoplasia on the lip and oral cavity. It is generally late-detected, locally invasive, and it has a high propensity for cervical lymph node metastases as well as blood-borne distant metastases. Diagnostic imaging for oral cancer is generally performed using conventional radiography, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), Computed Tomography (CT), ultrasonography (USG), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), and bone scintigraphy. This review provides a general overview of oral cancer imaging and basic principles of interpretation for oral cancer using several imaging modalities. The selection of imaging modalities for oral cancer must be based upon clinical condition, availability of imaging modalities, and cost effectivity. Despite the limited availability of modern imaging modalities in Indonesia, understanding on the major concept of various oral cancer imaging and its interpretation are certainly required by the dentists. Imaging and its interpretation are required to assist the diagnosis and determine the most appropriate treatment plan. Thus, the survival rate can be improved.

Nipple Discharge: Imaging Variability Among U.S. Radiologists.

The purpose of this study was to assess radiologists' choice of imaging modality for the evaluation of clinical symptoms of physiologic nipple discharge (e.g., bilateral discharge, multiple-duct orifices, and yellow, green, or white color) and pathologic nipple discharge (e.g., unilateral discharge, single-duct orifices, spontaneous and serous discharge, and clear or bloodstained color). An online survey was sent to lead interpreting physicians at mammography facilities accredited by the American College of Radiology (ACR). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests for frequency data and multinomial logistic regression. A total of 849 responses to 8170 distributed surveys were received, for a response rate of 10.4%. For the workup of physiologic nipple discharge, 30% of respondents recommended screening mammography (SM); 24%, diagnostic mammography (DM) only; and 46%, both DM and targeted ultrasound (US) (DM plus US). For the workup of physiologic nipple discharge, practitioners in nonacademic settings and those who read breast images during less than 50% of their practice were significantly more likely to recommend DM (with or without US), compared with SM (the standard recommended by the ACR). Those reading breast images less than 50% of the time were also more likely to recommend MRI after conventional imaging revealed negative results. For the workup of pathologic nipple discharge, 91.0% of respondents recommended DM plus US; 8.5%, DM only; and fewer than 1.0%, SM. Nonacademic providers and those who read breast images less than 50% of the time were significantly less likely to recommend DM plus US (the standard recommended by the ACR), compared with DM only. The present study shows variability in imaging modality selection among U.S. radiologists handling the imaging workflow for benign and pathologic nipple discharge. Radiologists do not uniformly follow ACR practice guidelines, which potentially leads to unnecessary workups and extra health care costs.

Contemporary best practice urolithiasis in pregnancy.

Urolithiasis is the most common nonobstetric complication in the gravid patient. The experience can provoke undue stress for the mother, fetus, and management team. The physiologic changes of pregnancy render the physical exam and imaging studies less reliable than in the typical patient. Diagnosis is further complicated by the need for careful selection of imaging modality in order to maximize diagnostic utility and minimize obstetric risk to the mother and ionizing radiation exposure to the fetus. Ultrasound remains the first-line diagnostic imaging modality in this group, but other options are available if results are inconclusive. A trial of conservative management is uniformly recommended. In patients who fail spontaneous stone passage, treatment may be temporizing or definitive. While temporizing treatments have classically been deemed the gold standard, ureteroscopic stone removal is now acknowledged as a safe and highly effective definitive treatment approach. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary, team-based approach involving the patient, her obstetrician, urologist, radiologist, and anesthesiologist is needed to devise a maximally beneficial management plan.

Metastasis in Adult Brain Tumors

Metastatic cancer to the central nervous system is primarily deposited by hematogenous spread in various anatomically distinct regions: calvarial, pachymeningeal, leptomeningeal, and brain parenchyma. A patient's overall clinical status and the information needed to make treatment decisions are the primary considerations in initial imaging modality selection. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the preferred imaging modality. Morphologic MR imaging is limited to delineating anatomic deraignment of tissues. Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion and diffusion-weighted physiology-based MR imaging sequences have been developed that complement morphologic MR imaging by providing additional diagnostic information.