Seizure-free Rate Research Articles

Effectiveness and safety analysis of ketogenic diet therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy caused by structural pathology

ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and safety of the ketogenic diet (KD) in children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) caused by structural etiology.MethodsThe children were categorized into acquired brain injury group and malformations of cortical development (MCD) group based on the etiology. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after KD treatment to observe seizure reduction, behavioral and cognitive improvements, adverse reactions events, and reasons for discontinuation withdrawal. Statistical analysis was conducted on the results.ResultsWe found the seizure-free rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 4.8% (2/42), 19% (8/42), and 21.4% (9/42), respectively. The seizure control effective rates were 42.9% (18/42), 52.4% (22/42), and 54.8% (23/42) at the corresponding time points. Compared to the acquired brain injury group, the MCD group showed a higher seizure control effective rate. Further analysis within the MCD group revealed the highest efficacy in focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). At the 3-month follow-up, cognitive and behavioral improvements were observed in 69% (29/42) of children. The main reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy and poor compliance.SignificanceFinally, we get that KD is a safe and effective treatment for drug resistant epilepsy caused by structural etiology, with the added benefit of improving behavioral and cognitive abilities in children. The efficacy is higher in children with MCD, particularly in cases of FCD. Early intervention with KD is recommended for this population.

Virtual resection evaluation based on sEEG propagation network for drug-resistant epilepsy

Drug-resistant epilepsy with frequent seizures are considered to undergo surgery to become seizure-free, but seizure-free rates have not dramatically improved, partly due to imprecise intervention locations. To address this clinical need, we construct effective connectivity to reveal epilepsy brain dynamics. Based on the propagation path captured by the high order effective connectivity, calculate the control centrality evaluation scheme of the excised area. We used three datasets: simulation dataset, clinical dataset, and public dataset. The epileptogenic propagation network was quantified by calculating high-order effective connection to obtain accurate propagation path, based on this, combined with the outdegree index for virtual resection. By removing electrodes and recalculating control centrality, we quantify each electrode or region’s control centrality to evaluate the virtual resection scheme. Three datasets obtained consistent results. We track the accurate propagation path and find the obvious inflection points occurring during the excision process. The minimum intervention targets were obtained by comparing different schemes without recurrence. The clinical data with multiple seizures found that after resection, the brain reaches a stable state and is less likely to continue spreading. By quantitative analysis of control centrality to evaluate the possible excision scheme, finally we obtain the best intervention area for epilepsy, which assist in developing surgical plans.

Efficacy of perampanel by etiology in Japanese patients with epilepsy-subpopulation analysis of a prospective post-marketing observational study.

To examine the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) in patients with post-stroke epilepsy (PSE), brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) using Japanese real-world data. The prospective post-marketing observational study included patients with focal seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures who received PER combination therapy. The observation period was 24 or 52 weeks after the initial PER administration. The safety and efficacy analysis included 3716 and 3272 patients, respectively. This post hoc analysis examined responder rate (50% reduction in seizure frequency), seizure-free rate (proportion of patients who achieved seizure-free), and safety in patients included in the post-marketing study who had PSE, BTRE, and PTE in the 4 weeks prior to the last observation. Overall, 402, 272, and 186 patients were included in the PSE, BTRE, and PTE subpopulations, and 2867 controls in the "Other" population (etiologies other than PSE, BTRE, or PTE). Mean modal dose (the most frequently administered dose) values at 52 weeks were 3.38, 3.36, 3.64, and 4.04 mg/day for PSE, BTRE, PTE, and "Other," respectively; PER retention rates were 56.2%, 54.0%, 52.6%, and 59.7%, respectively. Responder rates (% [95% confidence interval]) were 82% (76.3%-86.5%), 78% (70.8%-83.7%), 67% (56.8%-75.6%), and 50% (47.9%-52.7%) for PSE, BTRE, PTE, and "Other," respectively, and seizure-free rates were 71% (64.5%-76.5%), 62% (54.1%-69.0%), 50% (40.6%-60.4%), and 28% (25.8%-30.1%), respectively. Adverse drug reactions tended to occur less frequently in the PSE (14.7%), BTRE (16.5%), and PTE (16.7%) subpopulations than in the "Other" population (26.3%). In real-world clinical conditions, efficacy and tolerability for PER combination therapy were observed at low PER doses for the PSE, BTRE, and PTE subpopulations. To find out how well the medication perampanel works and whether it is safe for people who have epilepsy after having had a stroke, brain tumor, or head injury, we used information from real-life medical situations in Japan. We looked at the data of about 3700 Japanese patients with epilepsy who were treated with perampanel. We found that perampanel was used at lower doses and better at controlling seizures, and had fewer side effects for patients with epilepsy caused by these etiologies than the control group.

Cenobamate's Efficacy for Seizure Treatment in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

BackgroundEpilepsy is prevalent, and seizure control is challenging in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Cenobamate (CBM) has proven efficacy in several studies; however, its benefit in the TSC population is not known. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients with TSC who received adjunctive CBM for seizure treatments. We assessed treatment efficacy by comparing seizure frequencies three months before CBM (baseline) and those at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18- month follow-ups. ResultsWe identified 70 patients with TSC receiving CBM and excluded 16 with insufficient data. Fifty-four patients aged 2 to 39 years, with an average baseline seizure of 66.1 ± 88.9 per month, were analyzed. Treatment retention rates at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months were 94.4%, 79.6%, 66.7%, 44.4%, and responder rates (proportions of patients who remained on treatment and had ≥50% seizure reduction) were 38.1%, 51.7%, 53.1%, and 59.1%, respectively. Seizure-free rates at these respective follow-ups were 7.1%, 13.8%, 6.3%, and 9.1%. For patients experiencing reduced seizures, the mean percentage of change ranged from 61.5% to 74.6%. Side effects were common (64.8%), particularly sedation (42.6%), behavioral disturbance (24.1%), and gastrointestinal disturbance (22.2%). ConclusionsMost patients in this study showed seizure reduction; however, the overall responder and seizure-free rates were lower than the literature, likely due to the unique underlying epileptogenesis in TSC and the challenges of tolerating CBM. The lower treatment retention rates signal areas for improvement in concurrent medication adjustment practices.

Resective surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis in patients over 50 years: a case-control study.

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE/HS) is the most common cause of drug-resistant focal seizures and surgical resection is the primary treatment option, with seizure-free rates ranging from 60 to 80%. However, data on postsurgical seizure outcomes in patients ≥ 50years of age are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery in this age group compared to younger patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from resective surgeries conducted in patients with MTLE/HS between 1990 and 2022. We focused on patients aged ≥ 50years and compared the surgical safety and efficacy variables between this group and a control group of patients aged < 50years through a case-control study. Among the 450 MTLE/HS patients who underwent surgery during the inclusion period, 61 (13.6%) were aged ≥ 50years and matched with 183 younger patients, totaling 244 study participants. The two groups had similar characteristics. At the last follow-up (median 5.7years), Engel I outcomes were achieved in 80.3% of the older patients and 81.4% of the younger patients, with no significant difference (p = 0.85). Postoperative cognitive and psychiatric outcomes did not differ between the groups. Major complication rates were also comparable, at 3.3% in the older group and 2.7% in the younger group (p = 0.83). The extratemporal ictal abnormalities observed on video-EEG were the only variable that demonstrated a significant association with an unfavorable seizure outcome in the older group (OR 9.3, 95% CI [1.8-47.6], p = 0.005). This study provides grade 3 evidence that resective surgery for MTLE/HS patients aged ≥ 50years is as effective and safe as it is for younger patients, and thus should be considered as the primary treatment option for drug-resistant cases.

SEEG-RFTC in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: real-world outcomes from 121 cases.

Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment method for patients with refractory focal epilepsy, when stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is implanted. Although real-world research results are still limited, a considerable number of patients have shown favorable outcomes with this less invasive method. This study aims to describe the outcomes and predictive factors of SEEG-RFTC in real-world research. A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients in the authors' epilepsy center. In total, 121 patients who underwent RFTC were included in the study. Post-RFTC outcomes were evaluated using the seizure-free rate and response rate (seizure frequency reduction more than 50%). Predictive factors influencing post-RFTC outcome were considered by comparing different variables. The mean follow-up period was 18.3 months. Eighty-two patients (67.8%) were responders and 54 (44.6%) were seizure free. In 36 patients with malformation of cortical development, the seizure-free rate and the response rate were 69.44% and 83.33%, respectively. In 20 patients with hippocampal sclerosis, 19 patients were responders and 14 (70%) patients were seizure free at the last follow-up. The MRI feature and etiology of epilepsy are correlated with the outcome. MR-positive is a predictive factor for seizure freedom (p < 0.01) and responders (p < 0.01). Other factors have no predictive value for post-RFTC outcome. SEEG-RFTC is a safe procedure and yields favorable outcomes in numerous cases of focal DRE. The MRI feature and etiology of epilepsy are correlated with the seizure-free rate and response rate. And MRI positivity is the predictor for good RFTC outcome.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive Lacosamide therapy for focal seizures in young children aged ≥1 month to ≤4 years: A real-world study.

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide therapy against focal seizures in young children (1 month - 4 years). This non-randomized, open-label, and self-controlled real-world study included 105 children (1 month-4 years) with focal seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide therapy at Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. (1) The 50% response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up were 58.1%, 61.0%, 57.1%, and 56.2%, while the seizure-free rates were 27.6%, 34.3%, 32.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. The 50% response rate of the first addition of lacosamide for focal seizures was much higher than the second and later added treatment at 3 months (p = 0.038). After 1 year of follow-up, these children showed an improvement in neurodevelopmental levels (p < 0.05). (2) Lacosamide retention rate was 72.7% (64/88) after 1 year of follow-up. Lack of efficacy and serious adverse events were independent risk factors for the lacosamide retention rate. (3) During adjunctive lacosamide therapy, 13 (12.4%) patients reported adverse events and five (4.7%) patients withdrew due to adverse events, including vomiting drowsiness, ataxia (0.94%), neck itching with eczema (0.94%), irritability (1.88%), and gastrointestinal discomfort (0.94%). Adjunctive lacosamide therapy was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in young Chinese children with focal seizures in this study.

Genotype-relevant neuroimaging features in low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors.

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors are the second most common histopathological diagnoses in cases of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. However, the connection between neuroimaging features and genetic alterations in these tumors is unclear, prompting an investigation into genotype-relevant neuroimaging characteristics. This study retrospectively analyzed neuroimaging and surgical specimens from 46 epilepsy patients with low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors that had genetic mutations identified through panel sequencing to investigate their relationship to genotypes. Three distinct neuroimaging groups were established: Group 1 had indistinct borders and iso T1-weighted and slightly high or high T2-weighted signal intensities without a diffuse mass effect, associated with 93.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity to BRAF V600E mutations; Group 2 exhibited sharp borders and very or slightly low T1-weighted and very high T2-weighted signal intensities with a diffuse mass effect and 100% sensitivity and specificity for FGFR1 mutations; and Group 3 displayed various characteristics. Histopathological diagnoses including diffuse low-grade glioma and ganglioglioma showed no clear association with genotypes. Notably, postoperative seizure-free rates were higher in Group 1 tumors (BRAF V600E) than in Group 2 tumors (FGFR1). These findings suggest that tumor genotype may be predicted by neuroimaging before surgery, providing insights for personalized treatment approaches.

Perampanel in post-stroke epilepsy: Clinical practice data from the PERampanel as Only Concomitant antiseizure medication (PEROC) study

IntroductionPost-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence regarding the clinical profile of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in PSE. This study aims to evaluate the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) used as only add-on treatment in patients with PSE in a real-world setting. MethodsWe performed a subgroup analysis of PSE patients included in a previous retrospective, longitudinal, multicentre observational study on adults. Treatment discontinuation, seizure frequency and adverse events were collected at 3, 6 and 12 months. Sub-analyses by early (≤1 previous ASM) or late PER add-on were also conducted. ResultsOur analysis included 56 individuals with PSE, characterized by varying initial treatment modalities and timeframes relative to disease onset. We found notable retention rates (92.8%, 83.7%, and 69% at 3, 6, and 12 months), with treatment withdrawal mainly due to poor tolerability. One year after PER introduction, seizure frequency significantly reduced, with a responder rate (≥50% reduction) of 83.9% and a seizure-free rate of 51.6%. Adverse events occurred in 25 (46.3%) patients, mainly dizziness, irritability, and behavioural disorders. No major statistical differences were found between early (30 patients, 53.6%) and late add-on groups, except for a higher 6-month responder rate in the early add-on group. ConclusionAdjunctive PER was effective and well-tolerated in patients with PSE in a real-world setting. Perampanel demonstrated good efficacy and safety as both early and late add-on treatment, making it a compelling option for this unique patient population.

The cenobamate KORK study-A prospective monocenter observational study investigating cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in refractory epilepsy, with comparisons to historical cohorts treated with add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam.

In Europe, cenobamate has been approved for use as an adjunctive therapy in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE) with focal-onset seizures (FOS) who have not responded satisfactorily to treatment with at least two antiseizure medications (ASMs). Pivotal trials and real-world observational studies have demonstrated a high efficacy of cenobamate, even in very difficult-to-treat epilepsies. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of add-on cenobamate in adult PWE who were prospectively monitored. We compared these results with those previously obtained for add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam therapy. Patients were enrolled from the CENKORK study, which is a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, monocenter cohort study of adult PWE experiencing FOS. The titration of cenobamate was performed according to the guidelines outlined in the summary of product characteristics. The primary outcome measure was the retention rate at 6 months and 1 year. In addition, we assessed seizure-free rates, the proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% seizure reduction, adverse events, and the reasons for treatment discontinuation. These outcome measures were compared with historical controls treated with adjunctive lacosamide, perampanel, or brivaracetam at our center. Between June 2021 and 2022, 172 PWE with ongoing FOS were included. 22 cases were lost to follow-up, leaving 150 cases for the 1-year assessment. The retention rates at 6 months and 1 year were 88.7% and 80%, respectively. Seizure freedom was achieved in 14% of patients at both the 6-month and 1-year marks, while the ≥50% responder rates were 50% and 61%, respectively. The 6-month retention rate was significantly higher in cenobamate than in other ASMs (p < 0.001 for each comparator). Adverse events were significantly more common with perampanel (p < 0.001). Add-on cenobamate proved to be particularly efficacious compared to our experience with other recently introduced ASMs. This observational study was carried out in 172 adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy who were treated with adjunctive cenobamate. After 1 year, the data of 150 patients could be analyzed. Seizure freedom, in the preceding 3 months, was achieved in 14%. The rate of PWE continuing cenobamate was 80%. In our hands, cenobamate showed promising efficacy and tolerability even when compared to other recently introduced antiseizure medications.

Cenobamate Plasma Levels in Patients with Epilepsy: Correlation with Efficacy and Tolerability?

Objective: Cenobamate is approved by the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of adult patients with epilepsy (PWEs) with ongoing focal-onset seizures despite appropriate treatment with at least two established antiseizure medications. Pivotal trials and post-marketing real-world observational studies suggest high efficacy with unusually high seizure-free rates. The authors sought to investigate the plasma levels of cenobamate under steady-state conditions in seizure-free versus non-responding PWEs, and in PWEs who experienced adverse events versus those who did not. Methods: Blood samples were collected from adult PWEs who were treated with adjunct cenobamate under steady-state conditions. Daily doses, concomitant medications, efficacy, and tolerability were assessed. The plasma cenobamate levels of seizure-free versus non-responding PWEs and between PWEs with and those without clinical adverse events were compared. Results: Samples from 101 PWEs were included. Thirty-six PWEs were seizure-free and 65 were non-responders. In 31 PWEs, adverse events were apparent, whereas in the remaining 70, no tolerability issues were reported. A linear correlation was found between the daily doses (range: 100 mg-400 mg) and the plasma levels (3.8 mg/L-54.6 mg/L). Neither the daily doses nor the plasma levels differed significantly between the investigated subgroups. The main reason for this result was that the individual therapeutic ranges varied widely: seizure freedom and adverse effects were observed alongside low doses and plasma levels in some PWEs. Conversely, there were examples of PWEs who did not respond or who reported no tolerability issues at high doses or plasma levels. Conclusions: To evaluate the individual therapeutic range and to better understand the influence of other drugs in cases where concomitant medications are used, the therapeutic drug monitoring of cenobamate may be useful. A general therapeutic range cannot be defined.

Early Response, Long-Term Seizure Outcome, and Very-Low-Dose Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone Therapy for Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome With Down Syndrome

BackgroundInfantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) with Down syndrome has good treatment response and good seizure outcomes with high-dose adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) therapy. We investigated the early treatment response of epileptic spasms (ES), long-term seizure outcome, and efficacy of very-low-dose ACTH therapy for IESS with Down syndrome. MethodsWe retrospectively investigated patients with Down syndrome and IESS between April 1983 and January 2023. We defined response to treatment as clinical remission and electrographic resolution of hypsarrhythmia after treatment for more than one month and early treatment as any treatment for ES within three months of initiation of treatment. Long-term seizure outcomes were determined by the presence of any type of seizure within one year of the last visit. We investigated the dosage and efficacy of very-low-dose ACTH therapy. ResultsThirty patients were enrolled with a median follow-up period of 7.7 years (range: 1.3 to 19.1). The response and relapse rates in the early treatment were 83.3% and 16.0%, respectively. The seizure-free rate of long-term seizure outcomes was 80.0%. Long-term seizure outcomes correlated with early treatment response to ES. The response rate of very-low-dose ACTH therapy was 59.3%. The efficacy of ACTH therapy tended to be dose-dependent (P = 0.055). ConclusionsEarly treatment response to ES may be useful in predicting long-term seizure outcomes of IESS with Down syndrome. Very-low-dose ACTH therapy was the most effective treatment for ES and could exhibit dose-dependent efficacy. Depending on the IESS etiology, the ACTH dose could be reduced to minimize its side effects.

Effectiveness and safety of Lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy under four years: Results from a prospective cohort study in China

BackgroundLacosamide (LCM) has shown promising efficacy and safety outcomes in clinical trials. However, the evidence is limited among pediatric patients especially under four years in real-world. The study investigated the treatment outcomes and safety of LCM in patients under four years based on the data of the epilepsy registry of Children in China. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted among patients under 4 years who newly received LCM as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. The treatment outcomes were measured by retention rate of LCM, 50 % response rates and seizure-free rates during follow-up. The retention rate of LCM was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival model. Adverse events were reported as a percentage of all participants. ResultsOf 109 participants (mean follow-up: 18.6 months), 59 received LCM as monotherapy and 50 as adjunctive therapy. Sixty patients had focal epilepsy, 44 had generalized epilepsy and 5 had combined generalized and focal epilepsy. 70 % of patients in the monotherapy group and 41 % in the adjunctive therapy group remained on LCM treatment without additional treatments for at least one year. In patients with monotherapy, 50 % response rate and seizure-free rate were 75 % and 56 % at 12 months, respectively. In adjunctive therapy group, these rates were 51 % and 36 %, respectively. Lower baseline seizure frequency in both treatment groups (monotherapy: p < 0.001; adjunctive therapy: p = 0.02) and younger age groups within the monotherapy group (P = 0.04) correlated with a higher LCM retention rate. Adverse events were reported by 15 patients (13.8 %), with somnolence being the most common (7 of 15 patients). ConclusionWith a comprehensive information and high-quality of data, the study demonstrates the effective treatment outcome and safety of LCM. The study adds reliable evidence to exiting real-word evidence of LCM in the specific age group of patients with epilepsy to fill the evidence gap.

Clinical characteristics and impact of comorbidities on the prognosis of senile epilepsy in Southwest China: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundSenile epilepsy and its comorbidities pose a tremendous burden on patients and the society. This study was aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and comorbidities of senile epilepsy, as well as the impact of comorbidities on the prognosis of senile epilepsy.MethodsInformation of patients with senile epilepsy was retrospectively collected from three tertiary hospitals in Southwest China between December 2014 and December 2022. A total of 154 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of comorbidities. The prevalence, type, characteristics, and impacts of the comorbidities were investigated. The characteristics of patients with and without comorbidities were also compared.ResultsEighty-one percent of patients with senile epilepsy had at least one comorbidity, and 36% had three or more comorbidities. Eighteen different types of comorbidities were identified. The most common comorbidities were neurological (61%), followed by cardiovascular (45%) and psychiatric (26%) comorbidities. More than one-third of patients had bidirectional comorbidities, whereas more than half of the patients had additional causal comorbidities. Among all types of comorbidities, neurological and psychiatric comorbidities were found to be associated with an increased risk of recurrent seizures. Compared to patients without bidirectional comorbidities, those with at least one bidirectional comorbidity had a lower rate of achieving seizure freedom. The higher the number of bidirectional comorbidities, the lower the seizure-free rate. Survival analysis revealed that patients with neurological comorbidities had a higher risk of death.ConclusionsThis study revealed a high comorbidity rate and a low seizure-freedom rate among patients with senile epilepsy. In particular, neuropsychiatric comorbidities can increase the risk of seizures and affect the survival rate of patients with senile epilepsy. Therefore, preventing and managing these comorbidities may improve seizure outcomes and reduce mortality in this special population.

Effectiveness analysis of three-drug combination therapies for refractory focal epilepsy

Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini–Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n ​= ​95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n ​= ​48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17–0.85; adjusted P ​< ​0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21–1.04; adjusted P ​< ​0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR ​= ​0.67; adjusted P ​= ​0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.

Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy

BackgroundPerampanel (PER) is a newly developed amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist that has been globally approved for the treatment of both focal and generalized seizures. The efficacy and safety of PER have only been reported over short periods of treatment so far. This study aims to clarify the long-term efficacy and safety of PER as an add-on therapy. MethodThis retrospective observational study investigated 176 epilepsy patients who received PER as add-on medical therapy in two Japanese epilepsy centers between June 2016 and July 2022. The adherence, seizure frequency, and plasma concentration of PER were evaluated at three time points: 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months or longer after the start of adjunctive PER treatment. Results112 patients undergoing PER treatment were evaluated at 6 months, 86 were evaluated at 12 months, and 52 were evaluated at 24 months or longer. Overall, 42.9 % (48/112), 45.4 % (40/86), and 44.2 % (23/52) of the patients were seizure-free at 6, 12, and 24 months or longer, respectively. The rate of PER tolerance was 78.3 %, 69.9 %, and 54.7 % at 6, 12, and 24 months or longer, respectively. At the latest timepoint, the seizure-free group was taking a significantly lower dose of PER than the seizure-remnant group, and the number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) was associated with seizure outcomes. In addition, the seizure-free rate was significantly higher in patients who received PER as a first add-on than in those who received it as a late add-on. No significant difference was found in the plasma concentration of PER between the seizure-free and seizure-remnant groups at 24 months or longer. Among the patients receiving PER at dose of 2 mg, however, the plasma concentrations were significantly higher in the seizure-free group than in the seizure-remnant group (282.7 ± 109.8 μg/ml vs 94.7 ± 54.9 μg/ml, p = 0.0024). ConclusionThis long-term retrospective observational study provides evidence of the efficacy and safety of PER over 2 years treatment period in Japan. Notably, patients who started on PER as the first add-on showed a better seizure outcome than those who received it as a late add-on over the long term. Measured plasma concentrations may provide valuable guidance for the management of patients. Higher plasma concentration at low dose PER may suggest the better seizure control.

Efficacy and safety of perampanel as the first add-on therapy for children with epilepsy: A real-world multicenter prospective observational study

ObjectivePerampanel (PER) is a new anti-seizure medication (ASM) with a novel mechanism of action. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of PER when added to monotherapy in children and adolescents (age, 4–18 years) with epilepsy. MethodA multicenter prospective observational study was performed on children and adolescents (age, 4–18 years) with epilepsy who did not respond to ASM monotherapy between July 2021 and October 2022. PER was used as the first add-on therapy for the enrolled patients. Seizure-free rate, response rate, inefficacy rate, and drug retention rate were the main observation indicators during the 6 months of treatment. The patients were grouped based on treatment efficacy, and factors affecting efficacy were statistically analyzed. Adverse reactions were also recorded. ResultsIn this study, 93 patients with epilepsy were enrolled; among them, 9 patients were lost to follow-up (attrition rate, 9.7 %), and 84 were included in the analysis. Five patients with unknown efficacy discontinued taking PER early due to intolerable adverse reactions, and 79 patients (48 males, 31 females; mean age, 11.0 ± 3.9 years) finally remained. Genetic epilepsy and structural epilepsy were found in 22 patients and 36 patients, respectively. The mean duration of epilepsy history at the time of PER initiation was 4.0 ± 3.8 years, and the mean maintenance dosage of add-on PER was 4.5 ± 1.8 mg/day (equivalent to 0.14 ± 0.07 mg/kg/day). Among the 79 patients, 28 patients were diagnosed with epilepsy syndrome, including 13 patients having self-limited epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, among whom 9 patients were seizure-free after adding PER during the 6-month follow-up (seizure-free rate, 69.2 %). For these 79 patients, the seizure-free, response, and retention rates at the end of follow-up were 45.6 %, 74.7 %, and 82.1 %, respectively. Among the 84 patients included in the analyses, adverse reactions occurred in 20 patients, mainly dizziness (8 patients), somnolence (6 patients), and irritability (4 patients), and 4 patients developed two adverse reactions simultaneously. Univariate analyses revealed statistically significant differences in efficacy between groups with structural and non-structural epilepsy and between groups with different baseline concomitant ASMs, suggesting that these factors affected the efficacy of PER as the first add-on therapy. ConclusionThe overall response rate of PER as the first add-on therapy for children and adolescents with epilepsy who were followed up for 6 months was 74.7 %, indicating a relatively favorable safety and tolerability profile. The group of the baseline concomitant ASM administered and the etiological classification of epilepsy as either structural or non-structural were the factors influencing the efficacy of PER as the first add-on therapy.

Analysis of the efficacy and influencing factors of sodium channel blockers in the treatment of focal epilepsy in infants under 6 months of age

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of the sodium channel blockers (SCB) antiseizure medication in the treatment of focal epilepsy in infants under 6 months of age. Methods: This was a case series study. Infants with focal epilepsy with onset within 6 months of age and treated with SCB attending the Department of Neurology of Beijing Children's Hospital from June 2016 to April 2022 were collected. The clinical data, auxiliary examinations, SCB application, efficacy, adverse reactions, and prognosis were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped according to type of seizure and epileptic syndrome, age of onset and etiology. Chi square test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze the differences between groups statistically. Results: A total of 118 infants were enrolled, 65 males and 53 females, with an age of epilepsy onset of 56 (4, 114) days. Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy was diagnosed in 60 infants, 39 had self-limited neonatal and (or) infantile epilepsy, and 19 had non-syndromic focal epilepsy. Application of SCB: 106 used oxcarbazepine, 2 used lacosamide, 9 switched from oxcarbazepine to lacosamide or a combination of 2 SCB, and 1 used oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, and lamotrigine successively; oxcarbazepine was the first choice in 46 cases. The age at which SCB was applied was 103 (53, 144) days. The children were followed up for 6 months to 6 years. SCB was effective in 89 cases (75.4%), including 70 cases (59.3%) who achieved seizure freedom. The seizure-free rate was higher in the focal epilepsy only group than in the group with other seizure types (64.4% (65/101) vs. 4/17, χ²=9.99, P<0.05). The responder and seizure-free rates were all higher in the group with the onset age of >3-6 months than the group >1-3 months (84.4% (38/45) vs. 62.5% (20/32), 73.3% (33/45) vs. 46.9% (15/32), χ²=4.85 and 5.58, both P<0.05). With the exception of variants in the PRRT2 gene, those with variants in sodium or potassium channels had higher responder and seizure-free rates than those with variants in other genes(86.2% (25/29) vs. 45.5% (10/22), 62.1% (18/29) vs. 22.7% (5/22), χ²=9.65 and 7.82,both P<0.05). The most common adverse event was transient hyponatremia, which happened in 66 cases (55.9%). There were 9 cases of rash, which subsided in 6 cases after discontinuing oxcarbazepine and switching to lacosamide, and 7 cases of electrocardiogram abnormalities, which improved after withdrawing oxcarbazepine and changing to lacosamide in 1 case. Conclusion: SCB are effective and tolerable in the treatment of focal epilepsy in infants under 6 months of age, with better efficacy in patients with genetic variants of the sodium or potassium channel, focal seizures only, and seizure onset >3-6 months of age.

The clinical features of patients with seizure freedom and failure after total corpus callosotomy for childhood-onset refractory epilepsy

Background Corpus callosotomy is a palliative surgery for medically refractory epilepsy. We aim to analyze the clinical features of patients with seizure freedom and failure after total corpus callosotomy for childhood-onset refractory epilepsy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of patients with childhood-onset refractory epilepsy undergoing total corpus callosotomy between May 2009 and March 2019. Seizure outcome at the last follow-up was the primary outcome. The clinical features of patients with seizure freedom and failure after callosotomy were compared. Results Eighty patients with childhood-onset refractory epilepsy underwent total corpus callosotomy; 15 (18.8%) obtained freedom from all seizures and 19 (23.8%) had unworthwhile improvement and failure. The mean ages at seizure onset in patients with seizure freedom and failure after callosotomy were 5.7 and 5.9 years; and mean seizure durations were 9.4 and 11.5 years, respectively. Univariate analysis found epilepsy syndrome (p = 0.047), mental retardation (p = 0.007), previous medical history (p = 0.004), ≥10 seizures per day (p = 0.024), theta waves in the background electroencephalogram (p = 0.024), and acute postoperative seizure (p = 0.000) were associated with failure after callosotomy. Seizure freedom after callosotomy was more common among patients with less than 10 seizures per day. Conclusions Total corpus callosotomy is an effective palliative procedure for childhood-onset refractory epilepsy, particularly for patients with specific clinical characteristics. Callosotomy has a high seizure-free rate in well-selected patients.

Efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine in the treatment of focal epilepsy in neonates and infants under 3 months of age: A single-center retrospective analysis

ObjectiveThe neonatal and infantile period is the age group with the highest incidence of epilepsy, in which gene variants in sodium and potassium channels are an important etiology, so the sodium channel blocker class of antiseizure medications may be effective in the treatment of early onset epilepsy. This study aimed to summarize the efficacy and tolerability of oxcarbazepine (OXC) in the treatment of focal epilepsy in neonates and infants under 3 months of age. MethodsA retrospective analysis of children with focal epilepsy onset within 3 months of age and treated with OXC in a tertiary pediatric epilepsy center in China was conducted. The efficacy, tolerability and influencing factors of OXC were evaluated. ResultsA total of 50 patients were enrolled, with a median age of epilepsy onset of 11.5 (2, 42) days. There were 32 cases of early infantile developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 10 cases of self-limited neonatal or neonatal-infantile epilepsy, and 8 cases of focal epilepsy that could not be classified as epileptic syndrome. The median age of application of OXC was 47 (31, 66) days. The median follow-up time was 16.5 (10, 25) months, with 7 deaths. Thirty-eight cases (76.0 %) were effective with OXC treatment, including 28 cases (56.0 %) achieved seizure freedom. Of the 34 cases whose pathogenesis involved genetic factors, 19 cases with sodium/ potassium channel gene variants had higher effective and seizure-free rates than those with other gene variants. The most common adverse event was transient hyponatremia. 2 cases had rash and 2 cases had abnormal electrocardiogram, 3 of which discontinued OXC. SignificanceThis single-center retrospective study suggests that OXC is effective and tolerable for the treatment of focal epilepsy in neonates and infants under 3 months of age. The efficacy of OXC is better in patients with sodium/ potassium channel gene variants.