Cessation Of Seizures Research Articles

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Midazolam Compared With Lorazepam for Control of Seizures in Adults

What Is the Issue? The emergency treatment of prolonged seizures or status epilepticus is required to be rapid and efficient to prevent permanent brain damage or death. Benzodiazepines, such as midazolam, lorazepam, diazepam, and clonazepam, are established as first-line treatment medications for acute treatments of seizures. Various administration routes of delivery for these drugs have become available, but the comparative clinical effectiveness and safety among administration routes are still unclear. Decision-makers are interested in whether the current use of intramuscular (IM) midazolam for treatment of seizures by paramedics in a prehospital environment can be switched to IV lorazepam as normally used by nurses and physicians in clinic settings. What Did We Do? We identified and summarized the literature on the evidence of the clinical effectiveness and safety of midazolam compared to lorazepam in adults to control seizures. We searched key resources, including journal citation databases, and conducted a focused internet search for relevant evidence published since 2019. One reviewer screened citations for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings. What Did We Find? We identified 1 systematic review (SR) that included 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), only 1 was relevant to this review. This double-blind RCT determined the efficacy of IM midazolam as noninferior to IV lorazepam for treatment of seizures by paramedics in a mixed population of adults (89%) and children (11%). The authors of the SR conducted a subanalysis of a dataset of participant-level data and showed that IM midazolam was as effective and safe as IV lorazepam in adult patients for prehospital seizure cessation. The findings of the adult population were similar to those of the whole randomized population of both adults and children. What Does This Mean? With the shorter time required to administration of midazolam by the IM route compared to administration of lorazepam by the IV route, and the comparable efficacy and safety between the 2 active treatments, the use of IM midazolam may be a better option in the prehospital environment when IV access in patients with seizures is not readily established. Switching of IM midazolam to IV lorazepam for treatment of seizures by paramedics may not be practical.

Dramatic improvement of drug-resistant epilepsy following cerebral infarction: a case report

BackgroundAn estimated 30% of patients with epilepsy experience drug-resistant epilepsy, which is the failure to control seizures despite the use of two or more antiseizure medications. Although other treatment options are considered, these alternatives often prove ineffective.Case presentationA 60-year-old East Asian male patient diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy experienced several seizures daily despite being on eight different antiseizure medications. Seizures began at age 15. He underwent epilepsy surgery at age 34, yet the seizures persisted. An electroencephalogram revealed multifocal sharp waves in the left hemisphere. Cerebral hemorrhages at ages 47, 50, and 56 were caused by head trauma during seizures. The patient became wheelchair-bound and now resides in a nursing home. At age 58, after suffering an acute cerebral infarction due to occlusion of the left internal carotid artery, his daily seizures ceased entirely. Despite remaining wheelchair-bound, he did not experience a significant decline in his quality of life. The cessation of seizures has reduced his risk of further trauma, and he has remained seizure-free for 3 years on just one antiseizure medication.ConclusionSurgical treatments for epilepsy often fail, with insufficient resection being a leading cause of these failures. In some cases, extensive destruction from an ischemic stroke may be beneficial. Furthermore, this case suggests that infarction therapy could be a potential treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Intravenous lacosamide for acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill children.

Acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus are common neurological emergencies in critically ill children. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children with acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus. This retrospective study included children who received intravenous lacosamide for acute repetitive seizures or convulsive status epilepticus from October 2017 to September 2022 and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary medical center. Children who were newly started on intravenous lacosamide were included and divided into two groups: (a) previously healthy, and (b) history of epilepsy and receiving antiseizure medications. Efficacy was defined as the cessation of seizures within 72 h of administering lacosamide. Adverse effects were defined using predefined criteria, and most were evaluated during the first 7 days. Sixty-seven children were enrolled, including 25 (37.3%) girls and 42 (62.7%) boys with a mean age of 7.20 ± 5.66 years. Among them, 30 (44.8%) had acute repetitive seizures, and 37 (55.2%) had convulsive status epilepticus. The seizure types were focal onset (n = 34, 50.7%), generalized onset (n = 27, 40.3%), and mixed type (n = 6, 9.0%). In the previously healthy group, 9 patients had acute repetitive seizures and 23 had convulsive status epilepticus, and the rates of seizure cessation when lacosamide was used as the first to fourth choice of antiseizure medication were 100.0%, 85.7%, 40.0%, and 50.0%, respectively, compared to 73.7%, 54.5%, 100.0%, and 0.0% in the patients with epilepsy (21 had acute repetitive seizures and 14 had convulsive status epilepticus). Sixteen (23.9%) patients developed bradycardia and 1 (1.5%) patient developed a rash. The early use of intravenous lacosamide was effective with acceptable side effects in treating acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill children, including young infants and children less than 4 years old and those with different etiologies. Acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus are common neurological emergencies in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), traditional intravenous antiseizure medications (ASMs) include phenytoin, valproic acid, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital. In this study, we categorized patients based on their epilepsy history and different etiologies. We observed that early use of lacosamide, even in young infants, demonstrated good efficacy and safety.

A Simulation-Based Assessment of Levetiracetam Concentrations Following Fixed and Weight-Based Loading Doses: A Meta-Regression and Pharmacokinetic Modeling Analysis.

Current recommendations for refractory status epilepticus (SE) unresponsive to benzodiazepines suggest a loading dose of levetiracetam (LEV) of 60 mg/kg to a maximum of 4500 mg. LEV therapeutic drug monitoring can help guide therapy and is garnering increasing attention. The objective of this study is to simulate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of fixed dose and weight-based loading doses of LEV with respect to established therapeutic target concentrations. Meta-regression of the current literature was performed to evaluate the relationship between intravenous LEV loading dose and seizure cessation in refractory SE patients. A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate the PTA capacity of competing single intravenous dosing schemes (fixed vs weight-based dosing) to achieve maximum (Cpeak) and 12-h (C12h) plasma concentrations that exceed 12 mg/L. The meta-regression indicated that dosage was not a statistically significant modulator of seizure control at dosages between 20 and 60 mg/kg. Stochastic simulations showed all dosing schemes achieved plasma Cpeak >12 mg/L, but C12h levels were <12 mg/L in subjects over 60 kg with a fixed dose ≤2000 mg or in subjects <60 kg with a weight-based dose <30 mg/kg. Dosages of 40 and 60 mg/kg provided ≥90% PTAs across all weights. Using a weight-based loading dose of 40 mg/kg, up to a suggested maximum of 4500 mg, improves the likelihood of achieving a sustained therapeutic drug concentration after the initial LEV dose, whereas fixed <3000 mg may not achieve the desired concentration before maintenance dosing.

Long-term Effect of Multichannel tDCS Protocol in Patients with Central Cortex Epilepsies Associated with Epilepsia Partialis Continua.

Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is a rare type of focal motor status epilepticus that causes continuous muscle jerking in a specific part of the body. Experiencing this type of seizure, along with other seizure types, such as focal motor seizures and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, can result in a disabling situation. Non-invasive brain stimulation methods like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) show promise in reducing seizure frequency (SF) when medications are ineffective. However, research on tDCS for EPC and related seizures is limited. We evaluated personalized multichannel tDCS in drug-resistant EPC of diverse etiologies for long-term clinical efficacy We report three EPC patients undergoing a long-term protocol of multichannel tDCS. The patients received several cycles (11, 9, and 3) of five consecutive days of stimulation at 2mA for 2 × 20min, targeting the epileptogenic zone (EZ), including the central motor cortex with cathodal electrodes. The primary measurement was SF changes. In three cases, EPC was due to Rasmussen's Encephalitis (case 1), focal cortical dysplasia (case 2), or remained unknown (case 3). tDCS cycles were administered over 6 to 22 months. The outcomes comprised a reduction of at least 75% in seizure frequency for two patients, and in one case, a complete cessation of severe motor seizures. However, tDCS had no substantial impact on the continuous myoclonus characterizing EPC. No serious side effects were reported. Long-term application of tDCS cycles is well tolerated and can lead to a considerable reduction in disabling seizures in patients with various forms of epilepsy with EPC.

Seizure onset and offset pattern determine the entrainment of the cortex and substantia nigra in the nonhuman primate model of focal temporal lobe seizures.

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of drug-resistant epilepsy. A major focus of human and animal studies on TLE network has been the limbic circuit. However, there is also evidence suggesting an active role of the basal ganglia in the propagation and control of temporal lobe seizures. Here, we characterize the involvement of the substantia nigra (SN) and somatosensory cortex (SI) during temporal lobe (TL) seizures induced by penicillin injection in the hippocampus (HPC) of two nonhuman primates. The seizure onset and offset patterns were manually classified and spectral power and coherence were calculated. We then compared the 3-second segments recorded in pre-ictal, onset, offset and post-ictal periods based on the seizure onset and offset patterns. Our results demonstrated an involvement of the SN and SI dependent on the seizure onset and offset pattern. We found that low amplitude fast activity (LAF) and high amplitude slow activity (HAS) onset patterns were associated with an increase in activity of the SN while the change in activity was limited to LAF seizures in the SI. However, the increase in HPC/SN coherence was specific to the farther-spreading LAF onset pattern. As for the role of the SN in seizure cessation, we observed that the coherence between the HPC/SN was reduced during burst suppression (BS) compared to other termination phases. Additionally, we found that this coherence returned to normal levels after the seizure ended, with no significant difference in post-ictal periods among the three types of seizure offsets. This study constitutes the first demonstration of TL seizures entraining the SN in the primate brain. Moreover, these findings provide evidence that this entrainment is dependent on the onset and offset pattern and support the hypothesis that the SN might play a role in the maintenance and termination of some specific temporal lobe seizure.

Cenobamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Although most people with epilepsy achieve complete seizure cessation, approximately one-third of those with the condition continue experiencing seizures despite the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) given as monotherapy or polytherapy. In this review, we summarised the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about cenobamate as an add-on treatment for focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of add-on oral cenobamate for the treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures, defined as seizures persisting despite treatment with one or more ASMs. We searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE Ovid (September 2022). In addition, we contacted the manufacturer of cenobamate and experts in the field to enquire after any ongoing or unpublished studies. RCTs comparing add-on cenobamate to placebo or another ASM in people with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, performed risk of bias assessment, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our primary outcomes were at least a 50% reduction in total seizure frequency, seizure freedom, and the occurrence of adverse events. We used an intention-to-treat approach for our primary analyses. For each outcome we estimated summary risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We summarised the estimates of effects and certainty of the evidence for each outcome in a summary of findings table. We included two studies (659 adult participants, 442 allocated to cenobamate and 217 to placebo). The overall RR for at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 2.17 (52% versus 24%, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.84; 2 studies, 605 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The RR for seizure freedom for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 4.45 (16% versus 5%, 95% CI 2.25 to 8.78; 2 studies, 605 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The RR for the occurrence of adverse events for add-on cenobamate at any dose compared to placebo was 1.14 (77% versus 67%, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27; 2 studies, 659 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We judged the two included RCTs as at low or unclear risk of bias. Both studies were sponsored by the drug company that produces cenobamate. Add-on cenobamate is probably better than placebo in reducing the frequency of seizures by at least 50% and in achieving seizure freedom in adults with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by one or more concomitant ASMs (moderate level of certainty). Its use is probably associated with an increased risk of adverse events (moderate level of certainty). Further prospective, controlled trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on cenobamate compared to other ASMs. The efficacy and tolerability of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy in children should be further investigated. Finally, the long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on cenobamate treatment in people with other epilepsy types (e.g. generalised epilepsy) or specific epilepsy syndromes, as well as its use as monotherapy, require additional study.

Intravenous levetiracetam versus intravenous phenytoin as second Line treatment in pediatric convulsive status epilepticus- open label randomized controlled trial.

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are recommended as the initial therapy of choice in status epilepticus (SE). The age-old second-line treatment for BZD refractory convulsive SE is intravenous phenytoin (PHT) based predominantly on nonrandomized clinical trial data. We did this study to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous levetiracetam (LEV) and PHT as second-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for children with SE. A prospective, randomized controlled, open-label study was conducted in children 3 months to 15 years of age with SE in Pediatric Emergency. A total of 41 children were randomly allocated to either group 1 (Levetiracetam) or group 2 (Phenytoin) on the basis of computer-generated randomization. Children who were already on antiseizure medications, either LEV or PHT, or receiving these drugs outside for SE were excluded. Data analysis was done by SPSS V25. The most common age group presenting with SE was 12 months to 5 years. Clinical cessation of seizure 5 minutes after the completion of drugs was 85% (17/20) in Levetiracetam group and 90.5% (19/21) in Phenytoin group. Recurrence of seizure within 24 hours was noted in 35% (7/20) in Levetiracetam group and 38.1% (8/21) in Phenytoin group. There was no statistically significant difference noted in both the groups in terms of seizure cessation, adverse events, and recurrence. The efficacy and safety of LEV were found to be comparable to those of PHT in controlling seizure as second-line ASM in SE.

Disruption of adenosine metabolism increases risk of seizure-induced death despite decreased seizure severity.

Respiratory arrest plays an important role in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Adenosine is of interest in SUDEP pathophysiology due to its influence on seizures and breathing. The objective of this investigation was to examine the role of adenosine in seizure severity, seizure-induced respiratory disruption, and seizure-induced death using mouse models. Understanding adenosinergic contributions to seizure cessation and seizure-induced death may provide insights into how SUDEP can be prevented while avoiding increased seizure severity. Our approach was to examine: (1) seizure severity and seizure-induced death after 15 mA electroshock seizures and during repeated pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) administration in wild-type mice (Adk+/+) and transgenic mice with reduced adenosine metabolism (Adk+/-); (2) the postictal hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR) in wild-type mice (the postictal HCVR could not be examined in Adk+/- mice due to their high mortality rate); and (3) the effects of adenosinergic drugs on seizure severity and seizure-induced death following maximal electroshock (MES). Adk+/- mice were more vulnerable to seizure-induced death in the 15 mA electroshock and repeated PTZ models. Despite increased mortality, Adk+/- mice had comparable seizure severity in the PTZ model and reduced seizure severity in the 15 mA electroshock model. Breathing and HCVR were suppressed by 15 mA electroshock seizures in wild-type mice. Pharmacological inhibition of adenosine metabolism decreased MES seizure severity but did not increase mortality. A1 selective and nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists increased seizure-induced death following MES. Adenosine has opposing effects on seizure severity and seizure-induced death. On the one hand, our seizure severity data highlight the importance of adenosine in seizure suppression. On the other hand, our mortality data indicate that excessive extracellular adenosine signaling can increase the risk of seizure-induced respiratory arrest.

MiR-23b-3p Improves Brain Damage after Status Epilepticus by Reducing the Formation of Pathological High-Frequency Oscillations via Inhibition of cx43 in Rat Hippocampus.

In order to investigate the effectiveness and safety of miR-23b-3p in anti-seizure activity and to elucidate the regulatory relationship between miR-23b-3p and Cx43 in the nervous system, we have established a lithium chloride-pilocarpine (PILO) status epilepticus (SE) model. Rats were randomly divided into the following groups: seizure control (PILO), valproate sodium (VPA+PILO), recombinant miR-23b-3p overexpression (miR+PILO), miR-23b-3p sponges (Sponges+PILO), and scramble sequence negative control (Scramble+PILO) (n = 6/group). After experiments, we got the following results. In the acute phase, the time required for rats to reach stage IV after PILO injection was significantly longer in VPA+PILO and miR+PILO. In the chronic phase after SE, the frequency of spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRSs) in VPA+PILO and miR+PILO was significantly reduced. At 10 min before seizure cessation, the average energy expression of fast ripples (FRs) in VPA+PILO and miR+PILO was significantly lower than in PILO. After 28 days of seizure, Cx43 expression in PILO was significantly increased, and Beclin1expression in all groups was significantly increased. After 28 days of SE,the number of synapses in the CA1 region of the hippocampus was significantly higher in the VPA+PILO and miR+PILO groups compared to that in the PILO group. After 28 days of SE ,hippocampal necrotic cells in the CA3 region were significantly lower in the VPA+PILO and miR+PILO groups compared to those in the PILO group. There were no significant differences in biochemical indicators among the experimental group rats 28 days after SE compared to the seizure control group. Based on the previous facts, we can reach the conclusion that MiR-23b-3p targets and blocks the expression of hippocampal Cx43 which can reduce the formation of pathological FRs, thereby alleviating the severity of seizures, improving seizure-induced brain damage.

Intranasal vs Buccal vs Intramuscular Midazolam for the Home and Emergency Treatment of Acute Seizures in Pediatric Egyptian Patients

Abstract Introduction: Acute convulsions in children are a common emergency worldwide. Benzodiazepines are the recommended first line of treatment. We wished to compare the efficacy, ease of administration and overall satisfaction of midazolam by the buccal, intranasal orintramuscular route in the treatment of acute seizures in Egyptian children both at homes and Emergency room (ER) Methods A prospective, randomized, trial was performed in children aged 1 months to 17 years with acute seizures lasting longer than 5 min. Children were randomly assigned to receive midazolam, 0.2 mg/kg, by the buccal, intranasal or intramuscular route. The primary endpoint was seizure cessation within 10 min of drug administration and no seizure recurrence within 30 minutes. Results There were 196 seizures analysed in home group, 67 patients received midazolam via buccal route, 60 via intranasal, 69 via intramuscular route while 105 patients were recruited from ER 37 patients received buccal midazolam, 34 received intranasal and 34 received intramuscular midazolam. Intramuscular midazolam stopped seizures within 10 min in 94.2 % in home group and 85.3 % in ER group. On the other hand, intranasal midazolam was successful to stop seizures in 93.3% in home group and 88.2 % in ER group within 10 minutes. The buccal route was effective in 91% in home group and 78.4 % in ER group. There were no significant differences in efficacy between all groups. P = 0.763 and P = 0.509 among home and ER groups respectively. Time to seizure cessation was significantly higher in the buccal group 5.11 ± 1.23minutes in home group and 5.91 ± 1.25 in ER group (P = 0.000). Highest overall satisfaction and ease of administration was seen in intranasal group especially among caretakers in home group &amp;gt; 7= 49 (81.7 %) P = 0.002.. Intramuscular midazolam was more preferred by physicians in ERgroup &amp;gt;7=32 (94.1%) (P = 0.001) There were no significant cardio-respiratory events in all groups. Conclusions Our results indicate that there is no clinically important difference between buccal, intranasal and IM routes of administration midazolam. Buccal and intranasal midazolam were safe and effective for treatment of acute seizures in children.

Intranasal Versus Buccal Versus Intramuscular Midazolam for the Home and Emergency Treatment of Acute Seizures in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundBenzodiazepines are the recommended first-line treatment of acute seizures. We wished to compare the efficacy, side effects, and satisfaction after midazolam administration by the buccal, intranasal, or intramuscular route in the treatment of acute seizures in children at homes and in emergency room (ER). MethodsA prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed in children aged one month to 17 years with acute seizures lasting longer than five minutes. The primary end point was seizure cessation within 10 minutes of drug administration and no seizure recurrence within 30 minutes. ResultsIn the home group, 67 patients received midazolam via buccal route, 60 via intranasal route, and 69 via intramuscular route, whereas in the ER group, 37 patients received buccal, 34 received intranasal, and 34 received intramuscular midazolam. The primary end point was achieved in 94.2% and 85.3% after intramuscular midazolam in the home and ER groups, respectively. The intranasal midazolam was successful in stopping seizures in 93.3% in the home group and 88.2% in the ER group. The buccal route was effective in 91% in the home group and 78.4% in the ER group. There were no significant differences in efficacy between all groups (P = 0.763 and P = 0.509) among the home and ER groups, respectively. There were no significant cardiorespiratory events in all groups. ConclusionsIntramuscular, intranasal, and buccal doses of midazolam resolved most seizures in prehospital and emergency settings. Our results indicate that there is no statistically significant difference detected between different routes of midazolam. Intranasal route showed the highest satisfaction rate among caregivers.

Treatment of schizencephaly: A brief review and case study

Introduction: Schizencephaly is a rare disease. It is a poorly understood pathology. The clinical signs are variable and the diagnosis is made by elimination. The treatment is varied with poor results. Corticosteroids are not commonly used medications. Case Presentation: The observation concerns a 5-month-old child, born with a motor deficit in the right hemibody. His parents had an unremarkable medical history. After brain imaging for epileptic seizures, the child is referred for neurosurgery 5 months later. The diagnosis of schizencephaly was mentioned. Antiepileptic treatment associated with corticosteroid therapy for two weeks was started. Motor physiotherapy began at the same time. At 6 months after start of treatment, the evolution was satisfactory marked by a clear improvement in the motor deficit and a complete cessation of seizures. Conclusions: Due to its rarity, the diagnosis of schizencephaly is made by elimination. Brain MRI is the best radiological examination. Corticosteroid therapy combined with physiotherapy can have an impact on good progress. Treatment should be early.

Ketamine reduces seizure and interictal continuum activity in refractory status epilepticus: a multicenter in-person and teleneurocritical care study.

There is not a preferred medication for treating refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and intravenous ketamine is increasingly used. Ketamine efficacy, safety, dosage, and influence of other variables on seizure cessation while on ketamine infusions are not well studied. We aimed to characterize ketamine effect on RSE, including interictal activity on electroencephalogram (EEG) and when done by Teleneurocritical care (TNCC). We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study from August 2017 to October 2022. Patients 18years or older who had RSE and received ketamine were included. The primary outcome was effect of ketamine on RSE including interictal activity; secondary outcomes were effect of other variables on RSE, care by TNCC, ketamine infusion dynamics, adverse events, and discharge outcomes. Logistic regression was used. Fifty-one patients from five hospitals met inclusion criteria; 30 patients had RSE and interictal activity on EEG. Median age was 56.8years (IQR 18.2) and 26% had previously diagnosed epilepsy. Sixteen (31%) patients were treated virtually by TNCC. In those with RSE on EEG, ketamine was added as the fourth antiseizure medication (mean 4.4, SD 1.6). An initial bolus of ketamine was used in 24% of patients (95mg, IQR 47.5), the median infusion rate was 30.8 mcg/kg/min (IQR 40.4), and median infusion duration was 40h (IQR 37). Ketamine was associated with 50% cessation of RSE and interictal activity at 24h in 84% of patients, and complete seizure cessation in 43% of patients. In linear regression, ASMs prior to ketamine were associated with seizure cessation (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-6.9, p = 0.05), while the inverse was seen with propofol infusions (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.001-0.43, p = 0.01). RSE management by in-person NCC versus virtual by TNCC did not affect rates of seizure cessation. Ketamine infusions for RSE were associated with reduced seizure burden at 24h, with 84% of patients having 50% seizure reduction. Similar efficacy and safety was observed irrespective of underlying RSE etiology or when done via TNCC vs in-person NCC.

Clinical Experience With Lacosamide as an Adjunct Treatment for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

BackgroundLacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) currently approved for the treatment of focal seizures in children aged greater than one month. There are limited data on its efficacy in the neonatal age group. We describe our experience with LCM as an adjunct ASM for the treatment of neonatal seizures. MethodsA retrospective chart review over a five-year period (2018 to 2022) was conducted at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital to identify neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-proven seizures who were treated with LCM. Data were collected on electroclinical seizure characteristics, underlying etiology, ASMs, treatment response, and any adverse effects. ResultsA total of 15 neonates with EEG-confirmed seizures who were treated with LCM were included. Ten neonates achieved seizure cessation after LCM was added to their ASM regimen consisting of phenobarbital, levetiracetam, or both. No new treatment-related adverse effects were noted. ConclusionsLCM is effective as an adjunct treatment for neonatal seizures. Randomized controlled studies are needed to establish its effectiveness and adequate dosing regimen in this population.

Evaluating the effectiveness of the maximum permitted dose of midazolam in seizure termination: Insights from New South Wales, Australia.

Out-of-hospital seizures demand rapid management. Midazolam plays a key role in stopping seizures. At times the first dose of midazolam proves insufficient, necessitating additional doses. Within the New South Wales Ambulance (NSWA) service, the upper limit for midazolam administration is set at 15 mg. However, the outcomes and safety of using midazolam at this maximum dosage have not been thoroughly investigated. A retrospective analysis of out of hospital electronic health records from New South Wales, Australia, over the year 2022, was conducted. The study manually reviewed cases where adult patients received the maximum dose of midazolam for seizure management by paramedics. It focused on seizure cessation success rates and the incidence of adverse effects to evaluate the clinical implications of high-dose midazolam administration. Of 818 790 individual attendances by NSWA clinicians, a total of 11 392 (1.4%) adults had seizures noted, of which midazolam was administered in 2565 (22.5%). An algorithm shows that in 2352 (91.7%) instances the midazolam was associated with the apparent termination of seizures. Analysis revealed that 176 (1.5%) proportion of all adult's seizure patients required the maximum dose of midazolam for seizure control. These higher doses successfully terminate seizures in about half of the instances. AEs following the maximum dose of midazolam included hypoxia in 26.7% of patients and respiratory depression in 9.7%, indicating significant side effects at higher dosages. In New South Wales, Australia, administering the maximum dose of midazolam to seizure patients is rare but proves effective in approximately half of the refractory seizure cases. Therefore, assessing the potential for additional doses of midazolam or the use of a second-line agent is advisable.

Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus.

Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management of status epilepticus requires a patient-specific-approach framework, consisting of four axes: (1) semiology, (2) etiology, (3) EEG correlate, and (4) age. This article provides a comprehensive overview of status epilepticus, highlighting the current treatment approaches and strategies for management and control. Administering appropriate doses of antiseizure medication in a timely manner is vital for halting seizure activity. Benzodiazepines are the first-line treatment, as demonstrated by three randomized controlled trials in the hospital and prehospital settings. Benzodiazepines can be administered through IV, intramuscular, rectal, or intranasal routes. If seizures persist, second-line treatments such as phenytoin and fosphenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam are warranted. The recently published Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial found that all three of these drugs are similarly effective in achieving seizure cessation in approximately half of patients. For cases of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, IV anesthetics, including ketamine and γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABA-ergic) medications, are necessary. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the use of ketamine, not only in the early phases of stage 3 status epilepticus but also as a second-line treatment option. As with other neurologic emergencies, "time is brain" when treating status epilepticus. Antiseizure medication should be initiated quickly to achieve seizure cessation. There is a need to explore newer generations of antiseizure medications and nonpharmacologic modalities to treat status epilepticus.

Seizure control via pH manipulation: a phase II double-blind randomised controlled trial of inhaled carbogen as adjunctive treatment of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus (Carbogen for Status Epilepticus in Children Trial (CRESCENT))

BackgroundPaediatric convulsive status epilepticus is the most common neurological emergency presenting to emergency departments. Risks of resultant neurological morbidity and mortality increase with seizure duration. If the seizure fails to stop within defined time-windows, standard care follows an algorithm of stepwise escalation to more intensive treatments, ultimately resorting to induction of general anaesthesia and ventilation. Additionally, ventilatory support may also be required to treat respiratory depression, a common unwanted effect of treatment. There is strong pre-clinical evidence that pH (acid–base balance) is an important determinant of seizure commencement and cessation, with seizures tending to start under alkaline conditions and terminate under acidic conditions. These mechanisms may be particularly important in febrile status epilepticus: prolonged fever-related seizures which predominantly affect very young children. This trial will assess whether imposition of mild respiratory acidosis by manipulation of inhaled medical gas improves response rates to first-line medical treatment.MethodsA double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pH manipulation as an adjunct to standard medical treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children. The control arm receives standard medical management whilst inhaling 100% oxygen; the active arm receives standard medical management whilst inhaling a commercially available mixture of 95% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide known as ‘carbogen’.Due to the urgent need to treat the seizure, deferred consent is used.The primary outcome is success of first-line treatment in seizure cessation. Planned subgroup analyses will be undertaken for febrile and non-febrile seizures. Secondary outcomes include rates of induction of general anaesthesia, admission to intensive care, adverse events, and 30-day mortality.DiscussionIf safe and effective 95% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide may be an important adjunct in the management of convulsive status epilepticus with potential for pre-hospital use by paramedics, families, and school staff.Trial registrationEudraCT: 2021-005367-49. CTA: 17136/0300/001. ISRCTN: 52731862. Registered on July 2022.

Electroconvulsive Therapy in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been suggested as a treatment option for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). The objective of this scoping review was to conduct an extensive literature review on the role of ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. We searched Ovid MEDLINE and Scopus for journal articles from database inception until February 2024. Articles were then selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified five retrospective case series with 28 adult patients receiving ECT for RSE or SRSE. ECT was administered within 3-70days (mean 20days) after the development of SE, and the mean number of ECT courses ranged from 1 to 12 sessions for each patient. ECT was administered in fixed or titrated doses. A total of 20 out of 28 patients (71%) showed clinical improvement, with two (7%) having complete cessation of seizures. It is essential to note that given the lack of control, there could be overreporting of clinical improvement in these studies. 11 patients (39%) were reported as deceased due to causes that were not directly related to ECT treatment. Four patients (14%) reported adverse effects of ECT, including memory, concentration, and/or cognitive impairment. There are level-4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence and low-level Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Education evidence that suggest ECT as a treatment option for RSE and SRSE. In light of the limitations of the existing evidence, clinicians should carefully consider individual patients' clinical contexts when deciding on the appropriateness of ECT as a treatment option. Further research, including prospective studies with controlled designs, is needed to elucidate the efficacy, safety, and optimal regime of ECT in the management of RSE and SRSE.

Kematian Akibat Prolonged Hipoksia pada Status Epileptikus

Status epilepticus (SE) is a condition that results from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure cessation or from the initiation of mechanisms, leading to prolonged seizures. This is a condition that can have long-term effects (especially if the duration is &gt;30 minutes) such as death, injury, and changes in neuronal tissue depending on the type and duration of the seizure. The human brain consumes a very disproportionate amount of energy given its relatively small size, thus requiring a system capable of balancing cellular oxygen metabolism and brain blood flow control in order to maintain brain oxygen levels. Seizures have been shown to cause changes in oxygen levels beyond the normoxic range, which increases the likelihood that seizure-induced changes in brain pO2 may affect brain function during and after seizures. Decreased oxygenation is common during epileptic seizures. This has been seen on digital pulse oximetry (which measures oxygenation of either the fingers or toes) in the 25-33% saturation range when they have seizures. Such hypoxemia is more common in seizures that are generalized (ie begin as or become generalized tonic-clonic seizures) and/or prolonged.